<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN>
<h1>Cape Cod</h1>
<h2 class="no-break">by Henry David Thoreau</h2>
<h5>Author of “A Week on the Concord,” “Walden,”<br/>
“Excursions,” “The Maine Woods,” etc.</h5>
<h3><small>ILLUSTRATED BY</small><br/> CLIFTON JOHNSON</h3>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG src="images/thoreau.jpg" width-obs="200" height-obs="204" alt="thoreau" title="" /></div>
<h4>NEW YORK<br/>
THOMAS Y. CROWELL & CO.<br/>
PUBLISHERS</h4>
<h6>Copyright, 1908<br/>
<big>By THOMAS Y. CROWELL & CO.</big><br/>
THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A.</h6>
<hr />
<h2>Contents</h2>
<table summary="" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto">
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#pref01">INTRODUCTION</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap01">I. The Shipwreck</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap02">II. Stage-coach Views</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap03">III. The Plains Of Nauset</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap04">IV. The Beach</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap05">V. The Wellfleet Oysterman</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap06">VI. The Beach Again</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap07">VII. Across the Cape</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap08">VIII. The Highland Light</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap09">IX. The Sea and the Desert</SPAN></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> <SPAN href="#chap10">X. Provincetown</SPAN></td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2><SPAN name="pref01"></SPAN>INTRODUCTION</h2>
<p>Of the group of notables who in the middle of the last century made the little
Massachusetts town of Concord their home, and who thus conferred on it a
literary fame both unique and enduring, Thoreau is the only one who was Concord
born. His neighbor, Emerson, had sought the place in mature life for rural
retirement, and after it became his chosen retreat, Hawthorne, Alcott, and the
others followed; but Thoreau, the most peculiar genius of them all, was native
to the soil.</p>
<p>In 1837, at the age of twenty, he graduated from Harvard, and for three years
taught school in his home town. Then he applied himself to the business in
which his father was engaged,—the manufacture of lead pencils. He
believed he could make a better pencil than any at that time in use; but when
he succeeded and his friends congratulated him that he had now opened his way
to fortune he responded that he would never make another pencil. “Why
should I?” said he. “I would not do again what I have done
once.”</p>
<p>So he turned his attention to miscellaneous studies and to nature. When he
wanted money he earned it by some piece of manual labor agreeable to him, as
building a boat or a fence, planting, or surveying. He never married, very
rarely went to church, did not vote, refused to pay a tax to the State, ate no
flesh, drank no wine, used no tobacco; and for a long time he was simply an
oddity in the estimation of his fellow-townsmen. But when they at length came
to understand him better they recognized his genuineness and sincerity and his
originality, and they revered and admired him. He was entirely independent of
the conventional, and his courage to live as he saw fit and to defend and
uphold what he believed to be right never failed him. Indeed, so devoted was he
to principle and his own ideals that he seems never to have allowed himself one
indifferent or careless moment.</p>
<p>He was a man of the strongest local attachments, and seldom wandered beyond his
native township. A trip abroad did not tempt him in the least. It would mean in
his estimation just so much time lost for enjoying his own village, and he
says: “At best, Paris could only be a school in which to learn to live
here—a stepping-stone to Concord.”</p>
<p>He had a very pronounced antipathy to the average prosperous city man, and in
speaking of persons of this class remarks: “They do a little business
commonly each day in order to pay their board, and then they congregate in
sitting-rooms, and feebly fabulate and paddle in the social slush, and go
unashamed to their beds and take on a new layer of sloth.”</p>
<p>The men he loved were those of a more primitive sort, unartificial, with the
daring to cut loose from the trammels of fashion and inherited custom.
Especially he liked the companionship of men who were in close contact with
nature. A half-wild Irishman, or some rude farmer, or fisherman, or hunter,
gave him real delight; and for this reason, Cape Cod appealed to him strongly.
It was then a very isolated portion of the State, and its dwellers were just
the sort of independent, self-reliant folk to attract him. In his account of
his rambles there the human element has large place, and he lingers fondly over
the characteristics of his chance acquaintances and notes every salient remark.
They, in turn, no doubt found him interesting, too, though the purposes of the
wanderer were a good deal of a mystery to them, and they were inclined to think
he was a pedler.</p>
<p>His book was the result of several journeys, but the only trip of which he
tells us in detail was in October. That month, therefore, was the one I chose
for my own visit to the Cape when I went to secure the series of pictures that
illustrate this edition; for I wished to see the region as nearly as possible
in the same guise that Thoreau describes it. From Sandwich, where his record of
Cape experiences begins, and where the inner shore first takes a decided turn
eastward, I followed much the same route he had travelled in 1849, clear to
Provincetown, at the very tip of the hook.</p>
<p>Thoreau has a good deal to say of the sandy roads and toilsome walking. In that
respect there has been marked improvement, for latterly a large proportion of
the main highway has been macadamed. Yet one still encounters plenty of the old
yielding sand roads that make travel a weariness either on foot or in teams.
Another feature to which the nature lover again and again refers is the
windmills. The last of these ceased grinding a score of years ago, though
several continue to stand in fairly perfect condition. There have been changes
on the Cape, but the landscape in the main presents the same appearance it did
in Thoreau’s time. As to the people, if you see them in an unconventional
way, tramping as Thoreau did, their individuality retains much of the interest
that he discovered.</p>
<p>Our author’s report of his trip has a piquancy that is quite alluring.
This might be said of all his books, for no matter what he wrote about, his
comments were certain to be unusual; and it is as much or more for the
revelations of his own tastes, thoughts, and idiosyncrasies that we read him as
for the subject matter with which he deals. He had published only two books
when he died in 1862 at the age of forty-four, and his “Cape Cod”
did not appear until 1865. Nor did the public at first show any marked interest
in his books. During his life, therefore, the circle of his admirers was very
small, but his fame has steadily increased since, and the stimulus of his
lively descriptions and observations seems certain of enduring appreciation.</p>
<p class="right">
Clifton Johnson.</p>
<p>Hadley, Mass.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap01"></SPAN>I<br/> THE SHIPWRECK</h2>
<p>Wishing to get a better view than I had yet had of the ocean, which, we are
told, covers more than two-thirds of the globe, but of which a man who lives a
few miles inland may never see any trace, more than of another world, I made a
visit to Cape Cod in October, 1849, another the succeeding June, and another to
Truro in July, 1855; the first and last time with a single companion, the
second time alone. I have spent, in all, about three weeks on the Cape; walked
from Eastham to Province-town twice on the Atlantic side, and once on the Bay
side also, excepting four or five miles, and crossed the Cape half a dozen
times on my way; but having come so fresh to the sea, I have got but little
salted. My readers must expect only so much saltness as the land breeze
acquires from blowing over an arm of the sea, or is tasted on the windows and
the bark of trees twenty miles inland, after September gales. I have been
accustomed to make excursions to the ponds within ten miles of Concord, but
latterly I have extended my excursions to the seashore.</p>
<p>I did not see why I might not make a book on Cape Cod, as well as my neighbor
on “Human Culture.” It is but another name for the same thing, and
hardly a sandier phase of it. As for my title, I suppose that the word Cape is
from the French <i>cap</i>; which is from the Latin <i>caput</i>, a head; which
is, perhaps, from the verb <i>capere</i>, to take,—that being the part by
which we take hold of a thing:—Take Time by the forelock. It is also the
safest part to take a serpent by. And as for Cod, that was derived directly
from that “great store of codfish” which Captain Bartholomew
Gosnold caught there in 1602; which fish appears to have been so called from
the Saxon word <i>codde</i>, “a case in which seeds are lodged,”
either from the form of the fish, or the quantity of spawn it contains; whence
also, perhaps, <i>codling</i> (<i>pomum coctile?</i>) and coddle,—to cook
green like peas. (V. Dic.)</p>
<p>Cape Cod is the bared and bended arm of Massachusetts: the shoulder is at
Buzzard’s Bay; the elbow, or crazy-bone, at Cape Mallebarre; the wrist at
Truro; and the sandy fist at Provincetown,—behind which the State stands
on her guard, with her back to the Green Mountains, and her feet planted on the
floor of the ocean, like an athlete protecting her Bay,—boxing with
northeast storms, and, ever and anon, heaving up her Atlantic adversary from
the lap of earth,—ready to thrust forward her other fist, which keeps
guard the while upon her breast at Cape Ann.</p>
<p>On studying the map, I saw that there must be an uninterrupted beach on the
east or outside of the forearm of the Cape, more than thirty miles from the
general line of the coast, which would afford a good sea view, but that, on
account of an opening in the beach, forming the entrance to Nauset Harbor, in
Orleans, I must strike it in Eastham, if I approached it by land, and probably
I could walk thence straight to Race Point, about twenty-eight miles, and not
meet with any obstruction.</p>
<p>We left Concord, Massachusetts, on Tuesday, October 9th, 1849. On reaching
Boston, we found that the Provincetown steamer, which should have got in the
day before, had not yet arrived, on account of a violent storm; and, as we
noticed in the streets a handbill headed, “Death! one hundred and
forty-five lives lost at Cohasset,” we decided to go by way of Cohasset.
We found many Irish in the cars, going to identify bodies and to sympathize
with the survivors, and also to attend the funeral which was to take place in
the afternoon;—and when we arrived at Cohasset, it appeared that nearly
all the passengers were bound for the beach, which was about a mile distant,
and many other persons were flocking in from the neighboring country. There
were several hundreds of them streaming off over Cohasset common in that
direction, some on foot and some in wagons,—and among them were some
sportsmen in their hunting-jackets, with their guns, and game-bags, and dogs.
As we passed the graveyard we saw a large hole, like a cellar, freshly dug
there, and, just before reaching the shore, by a pleasantly winding and rocky
road, we met several hay-riggings and farm-wagons coming away toward the
meeting-house, each loaded with three large, rough deal boxes. We did not need
to ask what was in them. The owners of the wagons were made the undertakers.
Many horses in carriages were fastened to the fences near the shore, and, for a
mile or more, up and down, the beach was covered with people looking out for
bodies, and examining the fragments of the wreck. There was a small island
called Brook Island, with a hut on it, lying just off the shore. This is said
to be the rockiest shore in Massachusetts, from Nantasket to
Scituate,—hard sienitic rocks, which the waves have laid bare, but have
not been able to crumble. It has been the scene of many a shipwreck.</p>
<p>The brig <i>St. John</i>, from Galway, Ireland, laden with emigrants, was
wrecked on Sunday morning; it was now Tuesday morning, and the sea was still
breaking violently on the rocks. There were eighteen or twenty of the same
large boxes that I have mentioned, lying on a green hillside, a few rods from
the water, and surrounded by a crowd. The bodies which had been recovered,
twenty-seven or eight in all, had been collected there. Some were rapidly
nailing down the lids, others were carting the boxes away, and others were
lifting the lids, which were yet loose, and peeping under the cloths, for each
body, with such rags as still adhered to it, was covered loosely with a white
sheet. I witnessed no signs of grief, but there was a sober dispatch of
business which was affecting. One man was seeking to identify a particular
body, and one undertaker or carpenter was calling to another to know in what
box a certain child was put. I saw many marble feet and matted heads as the
cloths were raised, and one livid, swollen, and mangled body of a drowned
girl,—who probably had intended to go out to service in some American
family,—to which some rags still adhered, with a string, half concealed
by the flesh, about its swollen neck; the coiled-up wreck of a human hulk,
gashed by the rocks or fishes, so that the bone and muscle were exposed, but
quite bloodless,—merely red and white,—with wide-open and staring
eyes, yet lustreless, dead-lights; or like the cabin windows of a stranded
vessel, filled with sand. Sometimes there were two or more children, or a
parent and child, in the same box, and on the lid would perhaps be written with
red chalk, “Bridget such-a-one, and sister’s child.” The
surrounding sward was covered with bits of sails and clothing. I have since
heard, from one who lives by this beach, that a woman who had come over before,
but had left her infant behind for her sister to bring, came and looked into
these boxes and saw in one,—probably the same whose superscription I have
quoted,—her child in her sister’s arms, as if the sister had meant
to be found thus; and within three days after, the mother died from the effect
of that sight.</p>
<p>We turned from this and walked along the rocky shore. In the first cove were
strewn what seemed the fragments of a vessel, in small pieces mixed with sand
and sea-weed, and great quantities of feathers; but it looked so old and rusty,
that I at first took it to be some old wreck which had lain there many years. I
even thought of Captain Kidd, and that the feathers were those which sea-fowl
had cast there; and perhaps there might be some tradition about it in the
neighborhood. I asked a sailor if that was the <i>St. John</i>. He said it was.
I asked him where she struck. He pointed to a rock in front of us, a mile from
the shore, called the Grampus Rock, and added:</p>
<p>“You can see a part of her now sticking up; it looks like a small
boat.”</p>
<p>I saw it. It was thought to be held by the chain-cables and the anchors. I
asked if the bodies which I saw were all that were drowned.</p>
<p>“Not a quarter of them,” said he.</p>
<p>“Where are the rest?”</p>
<p>“Most of them right underneath that piece you see.”</p>
<p>It appeared to us that there was enough rubbish to make the wreck of a large
vessel in this cove alone, and that it would take many days to cart it off. It
was several feet deep, and here and there was a bonnet or a jacket on it. In
the very midst of the crowd about this wreck, there were men with carts busily
collecting the sea-weed which the storm had cast up, and conveying it beyond
the reach of the tide, though they were often obliged to separate fragments of
clothing from it, and they might at any moment have found a human body under
it. Drown who might, they did not forget that this weed was a valuable manure.
This shipwreck had not produced a visible vibration in the fabric of society.</p>
<p>About a mile south we could see, rising above the rocks, the masts of the
British brig which the <i>St. John</i> had endeavored to follow, which had
slipped her cables and, by good luck, run into the mouth of Cohasset Harbor. A
little further along the shore we saw a man’s clothes on a rock; further,
a woman’s scarf, a gown, a straw bonnet, the brig’s caboose, and
one of her masts high and dry, broken into several pieces. In another rocky
cove, several rods from the water, and behind rocks twenty feet high, lay a
part of one side of the vessel, still hanging together. It was, perhaps, forty
feet long, by fourteen wide. I was even more surprised at the power of the
waves, exhibited on this shattered fragment, than I had been at the sight of
the smaller fragments before. The largest timbers and iron braces were broken
superfluously, and I saw that no material could withstand the power of the
waves; that iron must go to pieces in such a case, and an iron vessel would be
cracked up like an egg-shell on the rocks. Some of these timbers, however, were
so rotten that I could almost thrust my umbrella through them. They told us
that some were saved on this piece, and also showed where the sea had heaved it
into this cove, which was now dry. When I saw where it had come in, and in what
condition, I wondered that any had been saved on it. A little further on a
crowd of men was collected around the mate of the <i>St. John</i>, who was
telling his story. He was a slim-looking youth, who spoke of the captain as the
master, and seemed a little excited. He was saying that when they jumped into
the boat, she filled, and, the vessel lurching, the weight of the water in the
boat caused the painter to break, and so they were separated. Whereat one man
came away, saying:—</p>
<p>“Well, I don’t see but he tells a straight story enough. You see,
the weight of the water in the boat broke the painter. A boat full of water is
very heavy,”—and so on, in a loud and impertinently earnest tone,
as if he had a bet depending on it, but had no humane interest in the matter.</p>
<p>Another, a large man, stood near by upon a rock, gazing into the sea, and
chewing large quids of tobacco, as if that habit were forever confirmed with
him.</p>
<p>“Come,” says another to his companion, “let’s be off.
We’ve seen the whole of it. It’s no use to stay to the
funeral.”</p>
<p>Further, we saw one standing upon a rock, who, we were told, was one that was
saved. He was a sober-looking man, dressed in a jacket and gray pantaloons,
with his hands in the pockets. I asked him a few questions, which he answered;
but he seemed unwilling to talk about it, and soon walked away. By his side
stood one of the life-boatmen, in an oil-cloth jacket, who told us how they
went to the relief of the British brig, thinking that the boat of the <i>St.
John</i>, which they passed on the way, held all her crew,—for the waves
prevented their seeing those who were on the vessel, though they might have
saved some had they known there were any there. A little further was the flag
of the <i>St. John</i> spread on a rock to dry, and held down by stones at the
corners. This frail, but essential and significant portion of the vessel, which
had so long been the sport of the winds, was sure to reach the shore. There
were one or two houses visible from these rocks, in which were some of the
survivors recovering from the shock which their bodies and minds had sustained.
One was not expected to live.</p>
<p>We kept on down the shore as far as a promontory called Whitehead, that we
might see more of the Cohasset Rocks. In a little cove, within half a mile,
there were an old man and his son collecting, with their team, the sea-weed
which that fatal storm had cast up, as serenely employed as if there had never
been a wreck in the world, though they were within sight of the Grampus Rock,
on which the <i>St. John</i> had struck. The old man had heard that there was a
wreck, and knew most of the particulars, but he said that he had not been up
there since it happened. It was the wrecked weed that concerned him most,
rock-weed, kelp, and sea-weed, as he named them, which he carted to his
barn-yard; and those bodies were to him but other weeds which the tide cast up,
but which were of no use to him. We afterwards came to the life-boat in its
harbor, waiting for another emergency,—and in the afternoon we saw the
funeral procession at a distance, at the head of which walked the captain with
the other survivors.</p>
<p>On the whole, it was not so impressive a scene as I might have expected. If I
had found one body cast upon the beach in some lonely place, it would have
affected me more. I sympathized rather with the winds and waves, as if to toss
and mangle these poor human bodies was the order of the day. If this was the
law of Nature, why waste any time in awe or pity? If the last day were come, we
should not think so much about the separation of friends or the blighted
prospects of individuals. I saw that corpses might be multiplied, as on the
field of battle, till they no longer affected us in any degree, as exceptions
to the common lot of humanity. Take all the graveyards together, they are
always the majority. It is the individual and private that demands our
sympathy. A man can attend but one funeral in the course of his life, can
behold but one corpse. Yet I saw that the inhabitants of the shore would be not
a little affected by this event. They would watch there many days and nights
for the sea to give up its dead, and their imaginations and sympathies would
supply the place of mourners far away, who as yet knew not of the wreck. Many
days after this, something white was seen floating on the water by one who was
sauntering on the beach. It was approached in a boat, and found to be the body
of a woman, which had risen in an upright position, whose white cap was blown
back with the wind. I saw that the beauty of the shore itself was wrecked for
many a lonely walker there, until he could perceive, at last, how its beauty
was enhanced by wrecks like this, and it acquired thus a rarer and sublimer
beauty still.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus02"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/whitehead.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="308" alt="Cohasset, The little cove at Whitehead promontory" title="" /> <p class="caption">Cohasset—The little cove at Whitehead promontory</p> </div>
<p>Why care for these dead bodies? They really have no friends but the worms or
fishes. Their owners were coming to the New World, as Columbus and the Pilgrims
did,—they were within a mile of its shores; but, before they could reach
it, they emigrated to a newer world than ever Columbus dreamed of, yet one of
whose existence we believe that there is far more universal and convincing
evidence—though it has not yet been discovered by science—than
Columbus had of this; not merely mariners’ tales and some paltry
drift-wood and sea-weed, but a continual drift and instinct to all our shores.
I saw their empty hulks that came to land; but they themselves, meanwhile, were
cast upon some shore yet further west, toward which we are all tending, and
which we shall reach at last, it may be through storm and darkness, as they
did. No doubt, we have reason to thank God that they have not been
“shipwrecked into life again.” The mariner who makes the safest
port in Heaven, perchance, seems to his friends on earth to be shipwrecked, for
they deem Boston Harbor the better place; though perhaps invisible to them, a
skillful pilot comes to meet him, and the fairest and balmiest gales blow off
that coast, his good ship makes the land in halcyon days, and he kisses the
shore in rapture there, while his old hulk tosses in the surf here. It is hard
to part with one’s body, but, no doubt, it is easy enough to do without
it when once it is gone. All their plans and hopes burst like a bubble! Infants
by the score dashed on the rocks by the enraged Atlantic Ocean! No, no! If the
<i>St. John</i> did not make her port here, she has been telegraphed there. The
strongest wind cannot stagger a Spirit; it is a Spirit’s breath. A just
man’s purpose cannot be split on any Grampus or material rock, but itself
will split rocks till it succeeds.</p>
<p>The verses addressed to Columbus, dying, may, with slight alterations, be
applied to the passengers of the <i>St. John:</i>—</p>
<p class="poem">
“Soon with them will all be over,<br/>
Soon the voyage will be begun<br/>
That shall bear them to discover,<br/>
Far away, a land unknown.<br/>
<br/>
“Land that each, alone, must visit,<br/>
But no tidings bring to men;<br/>
For no sailor, once departed,<br/>
Ever hath returned again.<br/>
<br/>
“No carved wood, no broken branches,<br/>
Ever drift from that far wild;<br/>
He who on that ocean launches<br/>
Meets no corse of angel child.<br/>
<br/>“Undismayed, my noble sailors,<br/>
Spread, then spread your canvas out;<br/>
Spirits! on a sea of ether<br/>
Soon shall ye serenely float!<br/>
<br/>
“Where the deep no plummet soundeth,<br/>
Fear no hidden breakers there,<br/>
And the fanning wing of angels<br/>
Shall your bark right onward bear.<br/>
<br/>
“Quit, now, full of heart and comfort,<br/>
These rude shores, they are of earth;<br/>
Where the rosy clouds are parting,<br/>
There the blessed isles loom forth.”</p>
<p>One summer day, since this, I came this way, on foot, along the shore from
Boston. It was so warm that some horses had climbed to the very top of the
ramparts of the old fort at Hull, where there was hardly room to turn round,
for the sake of the breeze. The <i>Datura stramonium</i>, or thorn-apple, was
in full bloom along the beach; and, at sight of this cosmopolite,—this
Captain Cook among plants,—carried in ballast all over the world, I felt
as if I were on the highway of nations. Say, rather, this Viking, king of the
Bays, for it is not an innocent plant; it suggests not merely commerce, but its
attend-ant vices, as if its fibres were the stuff of which pirates spin their
yarns. I heard the voices of men shouting aboard a vessel, half a mile from the
shore, which sounded as if they were in a barn in the country, they being
between the sails. It was a purely rural sound. As I looked over the water, I
saw the isles rapidly wasting away, the sea nibbling voraciously at the
continent, the springing arch of a hill suddenly interrupted, as at Point
Alderton,—what botanists might call premorse,—showing, by its curve
against the sky, how much space it must have occupied, where now was water
only, On the other hand, these wrecks of isles were being fancifully arranged
into new shores, as at Hog Island, inside of Hull, where everything seemed to
be gently lapsing, into futurity. This isle had got the very form of a
ripple,—and I thought that the inhabitants should bear a ripple for
device on their shields, a wave passing over them, with the <i>datura</i>,
which is said to produce mental alienation of long duration without affecting
the bodily health,<SPAN href="#linknote-1" name="linknoteref-1"><sup>[1]</sup></SPAN>
springing from its edge. The most interesting thing which I heard of, in this
township of Hull, was an unfailing spring, whose locality was pointed out to
me, on the side of a distant hill, as I was panting along the shore, though I
did not visit it. Perhaps, if I should go through Rome, it would be some spring
on the Capitoline Hill I should remember the longest. It is true, I was
somewhat interested in the well at the old French fort, which was said to be
ninety feet deep, with a cannon at the bottom of it. On Nantasket beach I
counted a dozen chaises from the public-house. From time to time the riders
turned their horses toward the sea, standing in the water for the
coolness,—and I saw the value of beaches to cities for the sea breeze and
the bath.</p>
<p>At Jerusalem village the inhabitants were collecting in haste, before a
thunder-shower now approaching, the Irish moss which they had spread to dry.
The shower passed on one side, and gave me a few drops only, which did not cool
the air. I merely felt a puff upon my cheek, though, within sight, a vessel was
capsized in the bay, and several others dragged their anchors, and were near
going ashore. The sea-bathing at Cohasset Rocks was perfect. The water was
purer and more transparent than any I had ever seen. There was not a particle
of mud or slime about it. The bottom being sandy, I could see the sea-perch
swimming about. The smooth and fantastically worn rocks, and the perfectly
clean and tress-like rock-weeds falling over you, and attached so firmly to the
rocks that you could pull yourself up by them, greatly enhanced the luxury of
the bath. The stripe of barnacles just above the weeds reminded me of some
vegetable growth,—the buds, and petals, and seed-vessels of flowers. They
lay along the seams of the rock like buttons on a waistcoat. It was one of the
hottest days in the year, yet I found the water so icy cold that I could swim
but a stroke or two, and thought that, in case of shipwreck, there would be
more danger of being chilled to death than simply drowned. One immersion was
enough to make you forget the dog-days utterly. Though you were sweltering
before, it will take you half an hour now to remember that it was ever warm.
There were the tawny rocks, like lions couchant, defying the ocean, whose waves
incessantly dashed against and scoured them with vast quantities of gravel. The
water held in their little hollows, on the receding of the tide, was so
crystalline that I could not believe it salt, but wished to drink it; and
higher up were basins of fresh water left by the rain,—all which, being
also of different depths and temperature, were convenient for different kinds
of baths. Also, the larger hollows in the smoothed rocks formed the most
convenient of seats and dressing-rooms. In these respects it was the most
perfect seashore that I had seen.</p>
<p>I saw in Cohasset, separated from the sea only by a narrow beach, a handsome
but shallow lake of some four hundred acres, which, I was told, the sea had
tossed over the beach in a great storm in the spring, and, after the alewives
had passed into it, it had stopped up its outlet, and now the alewives were
dying: by thousands, and the inhabitants were apprehending a pestilence as the
water evaporated. It had live rocky islets in it.</p>
<p>This Rock shore is called Pleasant Cove, on some maps; on the map of Cohasset,
that name appears to be confined to the particular cove where I saw the wreck
of the St. J aim. The ocean did not look, now, as if any were ever shipwrecked
in it; it was not grand and sub-lime, but beautiful as a lake. Not a vestige of
a wreck was visible, nor could I believe that the bones of many a shipwrecked
man were buried in that pure sand. But to go on with our first excursion.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-1" id="linknote-1"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-1">[1]</SPAN>
The Jamestown weed (or thorn-apple). “This, being an early plant, was
gathered very young for a boiled salad, by some of the soldiers sent thither
[<i>i.e.</i> to Virginia] to quell the rebellion of Bacon; and some of them ate
plentifully of it, the effect of which was a very pleasant comedy, for they
turned natural fools upon it for several days: one would blow up a feather in
the air; another would dart straws at it with much fury; and another, stark
naked, was sitting up in a corner like a monkey, grinning and making mows at
them; a fourth would fondly kiss and paw his companions, and sneer in their
faces, with a countenance more antic than any in a Dutch droll. In this frantic
condition they were confined, lest they should, in their folly, destroy
themselves,—though it was observed that all their actions were full of
innocence and good nature. Indeed, they were not very cleanly. A thousand such
simple tricks they played, and after eleven days returned to themselves again,
not remembering anything that had passed.”—Beverly’s
<i>History of Virginia</i>, p. 120.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap02"></SPAN>II<br/> STAGE COACH VIEWS</h2>
<p>After spending the night in Bridgewater, and picking up a few arrow-heads there
in the morning, we took the cars for Sandwich, where we arrived before noon.
This was the terminus of the “Cape Cod Railroad,” though it is but
the beginning of the Cape. As it rained hard, with driving mists, and there was
no sign of its holding up, we here took that almost obsolete conveyance, the
stage, for “as far as it went that day,” as we told the driver. We
had for-gotten how far a stage could go in a day, but we were told that the
Cape roads were very “heavy,” though they added that, being of
sand, the rain would improve them. This coach was an exceedingly narrow one,
but as there was a slight spherical excess over two on a seat, the driver
waited till nine passengers had got in, without taking the measure of any of
them, and then shut the door after two or three ineffectual slams, as if the
fault were all in the hinges or the latch,—while we timed our
inspirations and expirations so as to assist him.</p>
<p>We were now fairly on the Cape, which extends from Sandwich eastward
thirty-five miles, and thence north and northwest thirty more, in all
sixty-five, and has an average breadth of about five miles. In the interior it
rises to the height of two hundred, and sometimes perhaps three hundred feet
above the level of the sea. According to Hitchcock, the geologist of the State,
it is composed almost entirely of sand, even to the depth of three hundred feet
in some places, though there is probably a concealed core of rock a little
beneath the surface, and it is of diluvian origin, excepting a small portion at
the extremity and elsewhere along the shores, which is alluvial. For the first
half of the Cape large blocks of stone are found, here and there, mixed with
the sand, but for the last thirty miles boulders, or even gravel, are rarely
met with. Hitchcock conjectures that the ocean has, in course of time, eaten
out Boston, Harbor and other bays in the mainland, and that the minute
fragments have been deposited by the currents at a distance from the shore, and
formed this sand-bank. Above the sand, if the surface is subjected to
agricultural tests, there is found to be a thin layer of soil gradually
diminishing from Barnstable to Truro, where it ceases; but there are many holes
and rents in this weather-beaten garment not likely to be stitched in time,
which reveal the naked flesh of the Cape, and its extremity is completely bare.</p>
<p>I at once got out my book, the eighth volume of the Collections of the
Massachusetts Historical Society, printed in 1802, which contains some short
notices of the Cape towns, and began to read up to where I was, for in the cars
I could not read as fast as I travelled. To those who came from the side of
Plymouth, it said: “After riding through a body of woods, twelve miles in
extent, interspersed with but few houses, the settlement of Sandwich appears,
with a more agreeable effect, to the eye of the traveller.” Another
writer speaks of this as a <i>beautiful</i> village. But I think that our
villages will bear to be contrasted only with one another, not with Nature. I
have no great respect for the writer’s taste, who talks easily about
beautiful villages, embellished, perchance, with a “fulling-mill,”
“a handsome academy,” or meeting-house, and “a number of
shops for the different mechanic arts”; where the green and white houses
of the gentry, drawn up in rows, front on a street of which it would be
difficult to tell whether it is most like a desert or a long stable-yard. Such
spots can be beautiful only to the weary traveller, or the returning
native,—or, perchance, the repentant misanthrope; not to him who, with
unprejudiced senses, has just come out of the woods, and approaches one of
them, by a bare road, through a succession of straggling homesteads where he
cannot tell which is the alms-house. However, as for Sandwich, I cannot speak
particularly. Ours was but half a Sandwich at most, and that must have fallen
on the buttered side some time. I only saw that it was a closely built town for
a small one, with glass-works to improve its sand, and narrow streets in which
we turned round and round till we could not tell which way we were going, and
the rain came in, first on this side, and then on that, and I saw that they in
the houses were more comfortable than we in the coach. My book also said of
this town, “The inhabitants, in general, are substantial
livers.”—that is. I suppose, they do not live like philosophers:
but, as the stage did not stop long enough for us to dine, we had no
opportunity to test the truth of this statement. It may have referred, however,
to the quantity “of oil they would yield.” It further said,
“The inhabitants of Sandwich generally manifest a fond and steady
adherence to the manners, employments, and modes of living which characterized
their fathers”; which made me think that they were, after all, very much
like all the rest of the world;—and it added that this was “a
resemblance, which, at this day, will constitute no impeachment of either their
virtue or taste”: which remark proves to me that the writer was one with
the rest of them. No people ever lived by cursing their fathers, however great
a curse their fathers might have been to them. But it must be confessed that
ours was old authority, and probably they have changed all that now.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus03"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/windmill.jpg" width-obs="307" height-obs="450" alt="An old windmill" title="" /> <p class="caption">An old windmill</p> </div>
<p>Our route was along the Bay side, through Barnstable, Yarmouth, Dennis, and
Brewster, to Orleans, with a range of low hills on our right, running down the
Cape. The weather was not favorable for wayside views, but we made the most of
such glimpses of land and water as we could get through the rain. The country
was, for the most part, bare, or with only a little scrubby wood left on the
hills. We noticed in Yarmouth—and, if I do not mistake, in
Dennis—large tracts where pitch-pines were planted four or five years
before. They were in rows, as they appeared when we were abreast of them, and,
excepting that there were extensive vacant spaces, seemed to be doing
remarkably well. This, we were told, was the only use to which such tracts
could be profitably put. Every higher eminence had a pole set up on it, with an
old storm-coat or sail tied to it, for a signal, that those on the south side
of the Cape, for instance, might know when the Boston packets had arrived on
the north. It appeared as if this use must absorb the greater part of the old
clothes of the Cape, leaving but few rags for the pedlers. The wind-mills on
the hills,—large weather-stained octagonal structures,—and the
salt-works scattered all along the shore, with their long rows of vats resting
on piles driven into the marsh, their low, turtle-like roofs, and their
slighter wind-mills, were novel and interesting objects to an inlander. The
sand by the road-side was partially covered with bunches of a moss-like plant,
<i>Hudsonia tomentosa</i>, which a woman in the stage told us was called
“poverty-grass,” because it grew where nothing else would.</p>
<p>I was struck by the pleasant equality which reigned among the stage company,
and their broad and invulnerable good-humor. They were what is called free and
easy, and met one another to advantage, as men who had at length learned how to
live. They appeared to know each other when they were strangers, they were so
simple and downright. They were well met, in an unusual sense, that is, they
met as well as they could meet, and did not seem to be troubled with any
impediment. They were not afraid nor ashamed of one another, but were contented
to make just such a company as the ingredients allowed. It was evident that the
same foolish respect was not here claimed for mere wealth and station that is
in many parts of New England; yet some of them were the “first
people,” as they are called, of the various towns through which we
passed. Retired sea-captains, in easy circumstances, who talked of farming as
sea-captains are wont; an erect, respectable, and trustworthy-looking man, in
his wrapper, some of the salt of the earth, who had formerly been the salt of
the sea; or a more courtly gentleman, who, per-chance, had been a
representative to the General Court in his day; or a broad, red-faced Cape Cod
man, who had seen too many storms to be easily irritated; or a
fisherman’s wife, who had been waiting a week for a coaster to leave
Boston, and had at length come by the cars.</p>
<p>A strict regard for truth obliges us to say that the few women whom we saw that
day looked exceedingly pinched up. They had prominent chins and noses, having
lost all their teeth, and a sharp <i>W</i> would represent their profile. They
were not so well preserved as their husbands; or perchance they were well
preserved as dried specimens. (Their husbands, however, were pickled.) But we
respect them not the less for all that; our own dental system is far from
perfect.</p>
<p>Still we kept on in the rain, or, if we stopped, it was commonly at a
post-office, and we thought that writing letters, and sorting them against our
arrival, must be the principal employment of the inhabitants of the Cape this
rainy day. The post-office appeared a singularly domestic institution here.
Ever and anon the stage stopped before some low shop or dwelling, and a
wheelwright or shoemaker appeared in his shirt sleeves and leather apron, with
spectacles newly donned, holding up Uncle Sam’s bag, as if it were a
slice of home-made cake, for the travellers, while he retailed some piece of
gossip to the driver, really as indifferent to the presence of the former as if
they were so much baggage. In one instance we understood that a woman was the
postmistress, and they said that she made the best one on the road; but we
suspected that the letters must be subjected to a very close scrutiny there.
While we were stopping for this purpose at Dennis, we ventured to put our heads
out of the windows, to see where we were going, and saw rising before us,
through the mist, singular barren hills, all stricken with poverty-grass,
looming up as if they were in the horizon, though they were close to us, and we
seemed to have got to the end of the land on that side, notwithstanding that
the horses were still headed that way. Indeed, that part of Dennis which we saw
was an exceedingly barren and desolate country, of a character which I can find
no name for; such a surface, perhaps, as the bottom of the sea made dry land
day before yesterday. It was covered with poverty-grass, and there was hardly a
tree in sight, but here and there a little weather-stained, one-storied house,
with a red roof,—for often the roof was painted, though the rest of the
house was not,—standing bleak and cheerless, yet with a broad foundation
to the land, where the comfort must have been all inside. Yet we read in the
Gazetteer—for we carried that too with us—that, in 1837, one
hundred and fifty masters of vessels, belonging to this town, sailed from the
various ports of the Union. There must be many more houses in the south part of
the town, else we cannot imagine where they all lodge when they are at home, if
ever they are there; but the truth is, their houses are floating ones, and
their home is on the ocean. There were almost no trees at all in this part of
Dennis, nor could I learn that they talked of setting out any. It is true,
there was a meeting-house, set round with Lombardy poplars, in a hollow square,
the rows fully as straight as the studs of a building, and the corners as
square; but, if I do not mistake, every one of them was dead. I could not help
thinking that they needed a revival here. Our book said that, in 1795, there
was erected in Dennis “an elegant meeting-house, with a steeple.”
Perhaps this was the one; though whether it had a steeple, or had died down so
far from sympathy with the poplars, I do not remember. Another meeting-house in
this town was described as a “neat building”; but of the
meeting-house in Chatham, a neigh-boring town, for there was then but one,
nothing is said, except that it “is in good repair,”—both
which remarks, I trust, may be understood as applying to the churches spiritual
as well as material. However, “elegant meeting-houses,” from that
Trinity one on Broadway, to this at Nobscusset, in my estimation, belong to the
same category with “beautiful villages.” I was never in season to
see one. Handsome is that handsome does. What they did for shade here, in warm
weather, we did not know, though we read that “fogs are more frequent in
Chatham than in any other part of the country; and they serve in summer,
instead of trees, to shelter the houses against the heat of the sun. To those
who delight in extensive vision,”—is it to be inferred that the
inhabitants of Chatham do not?—“they are unpleasant, but they are
not found to be unhealthful.” Probably, also, the unobstructed sea-breeze
answers the purpose of a fan. The historian of Chatham says further, that
“in many families there is no difference between the breakfast and
supper; cheese, cakes, and pies being as common at the one as at the
other.” But that leaves us still uncertain whether they were really
common at either.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus04"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/sandwichstreet.jpg" width-obs="305" height-obs="450" alt="A street in Sandwich" title="" /> <p class="caption">A street in Sandwich</p> </div>
<p>The road, which was quite hilly, here ran near the Bay-shore, having the Bay on
one side, and “the rough hill of Scargo,” said to be the highest
land on the Cape, on the other. Of the wide prospect of the Bay afforded by the
summit of this hill, our guide says: “The view has not much of the
beautiful in it, but it communicates a strong emotion of the sublime.”
That is the kind of communication which we love to have made to us. We passed
through the village of Suet, in Dennis, on Suet and Quivet Necks, of which it
is said, “when compared with Nobscusset,”—we had a misty
recollection of having passed through, or near to, the latter,—“it
may be denominated a pleasant village; but, in comparison with the village of
Sandwich, there is little or no beauty in it.” However, we liked Dennis
well, better than any town we had seen on the Cape, it was so novel, and, in
that stormy day, so sublimely dreary.</p>
<p>Captain John Sears, of Suet, was the first per-son in this country who obtained
pure marine salt by solar evaporation alone; though it had long been made in a
similar way on the coast of France, and elsewhere. This was in the year 1776,
at which time, on account of the war, salt was scarce and dear. The Historical
Collections contain an interesting account of his experiments, which we read
when we first saw the roofs of the salt-works. Barnstable county is the most
favorable locality for these works on our northern coast,—there is so
little fresh water here emptying into ocean. Quite recently there were about
two millions of dollars invested in this business here. But now the Cape is
unable to compete with the importers of salt and the manufacturers of it at the
West, and, accordingly, her salt-works are fast going to decay. From making
salt, they turn to fishing more than ever. The Gazetteer will uniformly tell
you, under the head of each town, how many go a-fishing, and the value of the
fish and oil taken, how much salt is made and used, how many are engaged in the
coasting trade, how many in manufacturing palm-leaf hats, leather, boots,
shoes, and tinware, and then it has done, and leaves you to imagine the more
truly domestic manufactures which are nearly the same all the world over.</p>
<p>Late in the afternoon, we rode through Brewster, so named after Elder Brewster,
for fear he would be forgotten else. Who has not heard of Elder Brewster? Who
knows who he was? This appeared to be the modern-built town of the Cape, the
favorite residence of retired sea-captains. It is said that “there are
more masters and mates of vessels which sail on foreign voyages belonging to
this place than to any other town in the country.” There were many of the
modern American houses here, such as they turn out at Cambridgeport, standing
on the sand; you could almost swear that they had been floated down Charles
River, and drifted across the Bay. I call them American, because they are paid
for by Americans, and “put up” by American carpenters; but they are
little removed from lumber; only Eastern stuff disguised with white paint, the
least interesting kind of drift-wood to me. Perhaps we have reason to be proud
of our naval architecture, and need not go to the Greeks, or the Goths, or the
Italians, for the models of our vessels. Sea-captains do not employ a
Cambridgeport carpenter to build their floating houses, and for their houses on
shore, if they must copy any, it would be more agreeable to the imagination to
see one of their vessels turned bottom upward, in the Numidian fashion. We read
that, “at certain seasons, the reflection of the sun upon the windows of
the houses in Well-fleet and Truro (across the inner side of the elbow of the
Cape) is discernible with the naked eye, at a distance of eighteen miles and
upward, on the county road.” This we were pleased to imagine, as we had
not seen the sun for twenty-four hours.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus05"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/higgins.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="322" alt="The old Higgins tavern at Orleans" title="" /> <p class="caption">The old Higgins tavern at Orleans</p> </div>
<p>The same author (the Rev. John Simpkins) said of the inhabitants, a good while
ago: “No persons appear to have a greater relish for the social circle
and domestic pleasures. They are not in the habit of frequenting taverns,
unless on public occasions. I know not of a proper idler or tavern-haunter in
the place.” This is more than can be said of my townsmen.</p>
<p>At length we stopped for the night at Higgins’s tavern, in Orleans,
feeling very much as if we were on a sand-bar in the ocean, and not knowing
whether we should see land or water ahead when the mist cleared away. We here
overtook two Italian boys, who had waded thus far down the Cape through the
sand, with their organs on their backs, and were going on to Provincetown. What
a hard lot, we thought, if the Provincetown people should shut their doors
against them! Whose yard would they go to next? Yet we concluded that they had
chosen wisely to come here, where other music than that of the surf must be
rare. Thus the great civilizer sends out its emissaries, sooner or later, to
every sandy cape and light-house of the New World which the census-taker
visits, and summons the savage there to surrender.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap03"></SPAN>III<br/> THE PLAINS OF NAUSET</h2>
<p>The next morning, Thursday, October 11th, it rained, as hard as ever; but we
were determined to proceed on foot, nevertheless. We first made some inquiries
with regard to the practicability of walking up the shore on the Atlantic side
to Provincetown, whether we should meet with any creeks or marshes to trouble
us. Higgins said that there was no obstruction, and that it was not much
farther than by the road, but he thought that we should find it very
“heavy” walking in the sand; it was bad enough in the road, a horse
would sink in up to the fetlocks there. But there was one man at the tavern who
had walked it, and he said that we could go very well, though it was sometimes
inconvenient and even dangerous walking under the bank, when there was a great
tide, with an easterly wind, which caused the sand to cave. For the first four
or five miles we followed the road, which here turns to the north on the elbow,
—the narrowest part of the Cape,—that we might clear an inlet from
the ocean, a part of Nauset Harbor, in Orleans, on our right. We found the
travelling good enough for walkers on the sides of the roads, though it was
“heavy” for horses in the middle. We walked with our umbrellas
behind us, since it blowed hard as well as rained, with driving mists, as the
day before, and the wind helped us over the sand at a rapid rate. Everything
indicated that we had reached a strange shore. The road was a mere lane,
winding over bare swells of bleak and barren-looking land. The houses were few
and far between, besides being small and rusty, though they appeared to be kept
in good repair, and their dooryards, which were the unfenced Cape, were tidy;
or, rather, they looked as if the ground around them was blown clean by the
wind. Perhaps the scarcity of wood here, and the consequent absence of the
wood-pile and other wooden traps, had something to do with this appearance.
They seemed, like mariners ashore, to have sat right down to enjoy the firmness
of the land, without studying their postures or habiliments. To them it was
merely <i>terra firma</i> and <i>cognita</i>, not yet <i>fertilis</i> and
<i>jucunda</i>. Every landscape which is dreary enough has a certain beauty to
my eyes, and in this instance its permanent qualities were enhanced by the
weather. Everything told of the sea, even when we did not see its waste or hear
its roar. For birds there were gulls, and for carts in the fields, boats turned
bottom upward against the houses, and sometimes the rib of a whale was woven
into the fence by the road-side. The trees were, if possible, rarer than the
houses, excepting apple-trees, of which there were a few small orchards in the
hollows. These were either narrow and high, with flat tops, having lost their
side branches, like huge plum-bushes growing in exposed situations, or else
dwarfed and branching immediately at the ground, like quince-bushes. They
suggested that, under like circumstances, all trees would at last acquire like
habits of growth. I afterward saw on the Cape many full-grown apple-trees not
higher than a man’s head; one whole orchard, indeed, where all the fruit
could have been gathered by a man standing on the ground; but you could hardly
creep beneath the trees. Some, which the owners told me were twenty years old,
were only three and a half feet high, spreading at six inches from the ground
five feet each way, and being withal surrounded with boxes of tar to catch the
cankerworms, they looked like plants in flower-pots, and as if they might be
taken into the house in the winter. In another place, I saw some not much
larger than currant-bushes; yet the owner told me that they had borne a barrel
and a half of apples that fall. If they had been placed close together, I could
have cleared them all at a jump. I measured some near the Highland Light in
Truro, which had been taken from the shrubby woods thereabouts when young, and
grafted. One, which had been set ten years, was on an average eighteen inches
high, and spread nine feet with a flat top. It had borne one bushel of apples
two years before. Another, probably twenty years old from the seed, was five
feet high, and spread eighteen feet, branching, as usual, at the ground, so
that you could not creep under it. This bore a barrel of apples two years
before. The owner of these trees invariably used the personal pronoun in
speaking of them; as, “I got <i>him</i> out of the woods, but <i>he</i>
doesn’t bear.” The largest that I saw in that neighborhood was nine
feet high to the topmost leaf, and spread thirty-three feet, branching at the
ground five ways.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus06"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/nausetlane.jpg" width-obs="277" height-obs="450" alt="A Nauset lane" title="" /> <p class="caption">A Nauset lane</p> </div>
<p>In one yard I observed a single, very healthy-looking tree, while all the rest
were dead or dying. The occupant said that his father had manured all but that
one with blackfish.</p>
<p>This habit of growth should, no doubt, be encouraged; and they should not be
trimmed up, as some travelling practitioners have advised. In 1802 there was
not a single fruit-tree in Chatham, the next town to Orleans, on the south; and
the old account of Orleans says: “Fruit-trees cannot be made to grow
within a mile of the ocean. Even those which are placed at a greater distance
are injured by the east winds; and, after violent storms in the spring, a
saltish taste is perceptible on their bark.” We noticed that they were
often covered with a yellow lichen-like rust, the <i>Parmelia parietina</i>.</p>
<p>The most foreign and picturesque structures on the Cape, to an inlander, not
excepting the salt-works, are the wind-mills,—gray-looking octagonal
towers, with long timbers slanting to the ground in the rear, and there resting
on a cart-wheel, by which their fans are turned round to face the wind. These
appeared also to serve in some measure for props against its force. A great
circular rut was worn around the building by the wheel. The neighbors who
assemble to turn the mill to the wind are likely to know which way it blows,
without a weathercock. They looked loose and slightly locomotive, like huge
wounded birds, trailing a wing or a leg, and re-minded one of pictures of the
Netherlands. Being on elevated ground, and high in themselves, they serve as
landmarks,—for there are no tall trees, or other objects commonly, which
can be seen at a distance in the horizon; though the outline of the land itself
is so firm and distinct that an insignificant cone, or even precipice of sand,
is visible at a great distance from over the sea. Sailors making the land
commonly steer either by the wind-mills or the meeting-houses. In the country,
we are obliged to steer by the meeting-houses alone. Yet the meeting-house is a
kind of wind-mill, which runs one day in seven, turned either by the winds of
doctrine or public opinion, or more rarely by the winds of Heaven, where
another sort of grist is ground, of which, if it be not all bran or musty, if
it be not <i>plaster</i>, we trust to make bread of life.</p>
<p>There were, here and there, heaps of shells in the fields, where clams had been
opened for bait; for Orleans is famous for its shell-fish, especially clams,
or, as our author says, “to speak more properly, worms.” The shores
are more fertile than the dry land. The inhabitants measure their crops, not
only by bushels of corn, but by barrels of clams. A thousand barrels of
clam-bait are counted as equal in value to six or eight thousand bushels of
Indian corn, and once they were procured without more labor or expense, and the
supply was thought to be inexhaustible. “For,” runs the history,
“after a portion of the shore has been dug over, and almost all the clams
taken up, at the end of two years, it is said, they are as plenty there as
ever. It is even affirmed by many persons, that it is as necessary to stir the
clam ground frequently as it is to hoe a field of potatoes; because, if this
labor is omitted, the clams will be crowded too closely together, and will be
prevented from increasing in size.” But we were told that the small clam,
<i>Mya arenaria</i>, was not so plenty here as formerly. Probably the clam
ground has been stirred too frequently, after all. Nevertheless, one man, who
complained that they fed pigs with them and so made them scarce, told me that
he dug and opened one hundred and twenty-six dollars’ worth in one
winter, in Truro.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus07"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/nausetbay.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="304" alt="Nauset Bay" title="" /> <p class="caption">Nauset Bay</p> </div>
<p>We crossed a brook, not more than fourteen rods long, between Orleans and
Eastham, called Jeremiah’s Gutter. The Atlantic is said sometimes to meet
the Bay here, and isolate the northern part of the Cape. The streams of the
Cape are necessarily formed on a minute scale, since there is no room for them
to run, without tumbling immediately into the sea; and beside, we found it
difficult to run ourselves in that sand, when there was no want of room. Hence,
the least channel where water runs, or may run, is important, and is dignified
with a name. We read that there is no running water in Chatham, which is the
next town. The barren aspect of the land would hardly be believed if described.
It was such soil, or rather land, as, to judge from appearances, no farmer in
the interior would think of cultivating, or even fencing. Generally, the
ploughed fields of the Cape look white and yellow, like a mixture of salt and
Indian meal. This is called soil. All an inlander’s notions of soil and
fertility will be confounded by a visit to these parts, and he will not be
able, for some time afterward, to distinguish soil from sand. The historian of
Chatham says of a part of that town, which has been gained from the sea:
“There is a doubtful appearance of a soil beginning to be formed. It is
styled <i>doubtful</i>, because it would not be observed by every eye, and
perhaps not acknowledged by many.” We thought that this would not be a
bad description of the greater part of the Cape. There is a “beach”
on the west side of Eastham, which we crossed the next summer, half a mile
wide, and stretching across the township, containing seventeen hundred acres,
on which there is not now a particle of vegetable mould, though it formerly
produced wheat. All sands are here called “beaches,” whether they
are waves of water or of air that dash against them, since they commonly have
their origin on the shore. “The sand in some places,” says the
historian of Eastham, “lodging against the beach-grass, has been raised
into hills fifty feet high, where twenty-five years ago no hills existed. In
others it has filled up small valleys, and swamps. Where a strong-rooted bush
stood, the appearance is singular: a mass of earth and sand adheres to it,
resembling a small tower. In several places, rocks, which were formerly covered
with soil, are disclosed, and being lashed by the sand, driven against them by
the wind, look as if they were recently dug from a quarry.”</p>
<p>We were surprised to hear of the great crops of corn which are still raised in
Eastham, notwithstanding the real and apparent barrenness. Our landlord in
Orleans had told us that he raised three or four hundred bushels of corn
annually, and also of the great number of pigs which he fattened. In
Champlain’s “Voyages,” there is a plate representing the
Indian cornfields hereabouts, with their wigwams in the midst, as they appeared
in 1605, and it was here that the Pilgrims, to quote their own words,
“bought eight or ten hogsheads of corn and beans” of the Nauset
Indians, in 1622, to keep themselves from starving.<SPAN href="#linknote-2"
name="linknoteref-2"><sup>[1]</sup></SPAN></p>
<p>“In 1667 the town [of Eastham] voted that every housekeeper should kill
twelve blackbirds or three crows, which did great damage to the corn; and this
vote was repeated for many years.” In 1695 an additional order was
passed, namely, that “every unmarried man in the township shall kill six
blackbirds, or three crows, while he remains single; as a penalty for not doing
it, shall not be married until he obey this order.” The blackbirds,
however, still molest the corn. I saw them at it the next summer, and there
were many scarecrows, if not scare-blackbirds, in the fields, which I often
mistook for men.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus08"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/scarecrow.jpg" width-obs="284" height-obs="450" alt="A scarecrow" title="" /> <p class="caption">A scarecrow</p> </div>
<p>From which I concluded that either many men were not married, or many
blackbirds were. Yet they put but three or four kernels in a hill, and let
fewer plants remain than we do. In the account of Eastham, in the
“Historical Collections,” printed in 1802, it is said, that
“more corn is produced than the inhabitants consume, and about a thousand
bushels are annually sent to market. The soil being free from stones, a plough
passes through it speedily; and after the corn has come up, a small Cape horse,
somewhat larger than a goat, will, with the assistance of two boys, easily hoe
three or four acres in a day; several farmers are accustomed to produce five
hundred bushels of grain annually, and not long since one raised eight hundred
bushels on sixty acres.” Similar accounts are given to-day; indeed, the
recent accounts are in some instances suspectable repetitions of the old, and I
have no doubt that their statements are as often founded on the exception as
the rule, and that by far the greater number of acres are as barren as they
appear to be. It is sufficiently remarkable that any crops can be raised here,
and it may be owing, as others have suggested, to the amount of moisture in the
atmosphere, the warmth of the sand, and the rareness of frosts. A miller, who
was sharpening his stones, told me that, forty years ago, he had been to a
husking here, where five hundred bushels were husked in one evening, and the
corn was piled six feet high or more, in the midst, but now, fifteen or
eighteen bushels to an acre were an average yield. I never saw fields of such
puny and unpromising looking corn as in this town. Probably the inhabitants are
contented with small crops from a great surface easily cultivated. It is not
always the most fertile land that is the most profitable, and this sand may
repay cultivation, as well as the fertile bottoms of the West. It is said,
moreover, that the vegetables raised in the sand, without manure, are
remarkably sweet, the pumpkins especially, though when their seed is planted in
the interior they soon degenerate. I can testify that the vegetables here, when
they succeed at all, look remarkably green and healthy, though perhaps it is
partly by contrast with the sand. Yet the inhabitants of the Cape towns,
generally, do not raise their own meal or pork. Their gardens are commonly
little patches, that have been redeemed from the edges of the marshes and
swamps.</p>
<p>All the morning we had heard the sea roar on the eastern shore, which was
several miles distant; for it still felt the effects of the storm in which the
<i>St. John</i> was wrecked,—though a school-boy, whom we overtook,
hardly knew what we meant, his ears were so used to it. He would have more
plainly heard the same sound in a shell. It was a very inspiriting sound to
walk by, filling the whole air, that of the sea dashing against the land, heard
several miles inland. Instead of having a dog to growl before your door, to
have an Atlantic Ocean to growl for a whole Cape! On the whole, we were glad of
the storm, which would show us the ocean in its angriest mood. Charles Darwin
was assured that the roar of the surf on the coast of Chiloe, after a heavy
gale, could be heard at night a distance of “21 sea miles across a hilly
and wooded country.” We conversed with the boy we have mentioned, who
might have been eight years old, making him walk the while under the lee of our
umbrella; for we thought it as important to know what was life on the Cape to a
boy as to a man. We learned from him where the best grapes were to be found in
that neighborhood. He was carrying his dinner in a pail; and, without any
impertinent questions being put by us, it did at length appear of what it
consisted. The homeliest facts are always the most acceptable to an inquiring
mind. At length, before we got to Eastham meeting-house, we left the road and
struck across the country for the eastern shore at Nauset Lights,—three
lights close together, two or three miles distant from us. They were so many
that they might be distinguished from others; but this seemed a shiftless and
costly way of accomplishing that object. We found ourselves at once on an
apparently boundless plain, without a tree or a fence, or, with one or two
exceptions, a house in sight. Instead of fences, the earth was sometimes thrown
up into a slight ridge. My companion compared it to the rolling prairies of
Illinois. In the storm of wind and rain which raged when we traversed it, it no
doubt appeared more vast and desolate than it really is. As there were no
hills, but only here and there a dry hollow in the midst of the waste, and the
distant horizon was concealed by mist, we did not know whether it was high or
low. A solitary traveller whom we saw perambulating in the distance loomed like
a giant. He appeared to walk slouchingly, as if held up from above by straps
under his shoulders, as much as supported by the plain below. Men and boys
would have appeared alike at a little distance, there being no object by which
to measure them. Indeed, to an inlander, the Cape landscape is a constant
mirage. This kind of country extended a mile or two each way. These were the
“Plains of Nauset,” once covered with wood, where in winter the
winds howl and the snow blows right merrily in the face of the traveller. I was
glad to have got out of the towns, where I am wont to feel unspeakably mean and
disgraced,—to have left behind me for a season the bar-rooms of
Massachusetts, where the full-grown are not weaned from savage and filthy
habits,—still sucking a cigar. My spirits rose in proportion to the
outward dreariness. The towns need to be ventilated. The gods would be pleased
to see some pure flames from their altars. They are not to be appeased with
cigar-smoke.</p>
<p>As we thus skirted the back-side of the towns, for we did not enter any
village, till we got to Provincetown, we read their histories under our
umbrellas, rarely meeting anybody. The old accounts are the richest in
topography, which was what we wanted most; and, indeed, in most things else,
for I find that the readable parts of the modern accounts of these towns
consist, in a great measure, of quotations, acknowledged and unacknowledged,
from the older ones, without any additional information of equal
interest;—town histories, which at length run into a history of the
Church of that place, that being the only story they have to tell, and conclude
by quoting the Latin epitaphs of the old pastors, having been written in the
good old days of Latin and of Greek. They will go back to the ordination of
every minister and tell you faithfully who made the introductory prayer, and
who delivered the sermon; who made the ordaining prayer, and who gave the
charge; who extended the right hand of fellowship, and who pronounced the
benediction; also how many ecclesiastical councils convened from time to time
to inquire into the orthodoxy of some minister, and the names of all who
composed them. As it will take us an hour to get over this plain, and there is
no variety in the prospect, peculiar as it is, I will read a little in the
history of Eastham the while.</p>
<p>When the committee from Plymouth had purchased the territory of Eastham of the
Indians, “it was demanded, who laid claim to Billingsgate?” which
was understood to be all that part of the Cape north of what they had
purchased. “The answer was, there was not any who owned it.
‘Then,’ said the committee, ‘that land is ours.’ The
Indians answered, that it was.” This was a remarkable assertion and
admission. The Pilgrims appear to have regarded themselves as Not Any’s
representatives. Perhaps this was the first instance of that quiet way of
“speaking for” a place not yet occupied, or at least not improved
as much as it may be, which their descendants have practised, and are still
practising so extensively. Not Any seems to have been the sole proprietor of
all America before the Yankees. But history says that, when the Pilgrims had
held the lands of Billingsgate many years, at length “appeared an Indian,
who styled himself Lieutenant Anthony,” who laid claim to them, and of
him they bought them. Who knows but a Lieutenant Anthony may be knocking at the
door of the White House some day? At any rate, I know that if you hold a thing
unjustly, there will surely be the devil to pay at last.</p>
<p>Thomas Prince, who was several times the governor of the Plymouth colony, was
the leader of the settlement of Eastham. There was recently standing, on what
was once his farm, in this town, a pear-tree which is said to have been brought
from England, and planted there by him, about two hundred years ago. It was
blown down a few months before we were there. A late account says that it was
recently in a vigorous state; the fruit small, but excellent; and it yielded on
an average fifteen bushels. Some appropriate lines have been addressed to it,
by a Mr. Heman Doane, from which I will quote, partly because they are the only
specimen of Cape Cod verse which I remember to have seen, and partly because
they are not bad.</p>
<p class="poem">
“Two hundred years have, on the wings of Time,<br/>
Passed with their joys and woes, since thou, Old Tree!<br/>
Put forth thy first leaves in this foreign clime.<br/>
Transplanted from the soil beyond the sea.”</p>
<p class="asterism">
* * * * *</p>
<p>[These stars represent the more clerical lines, and also those which have
deceased.]</p>
<p class="poem">
“That exiled band long since have passed away,<br/>
And still, Old Tree I thou standest in the place<br/>
Where Prince’s hand did plant thee in his day,—<br/>
An undesigned memorial of his race<br/>
And time; of those out honored fathers,<br/>
when They came from Plymouth o’er and settled here;<br/>
Doane, Higgins, Snow, and other worthy men.<br/>
Whose names their sons remember to revere.</p>
<p class="asterism">
* * * * *</p>
<p class="poem">
“Old Time has thinned thy boughs. Old Pilgrim Tree!<br/>
And bowed thee with the weight of many years;<br/>
Yet ’mid the frosts of age, thy bloom we see,<br/>
And yearly still thy mellow fruit appears.”</p>
<p>There are some other lines which I might quote, if they were not tied to
unworthy companions by the rhyme. When one ox will lie down, the yoke bears
hard on him that stands up.</p>
<p>One of the first settlers of Eastham was Deacon John Doane, who died in 1707,
aged one hundred and ten. Tradition says that he was rocked in a cradle several
of his last years. That, certainly, was not an Achillean life. His mother must
have let him slip when she dipped him into the liquor which was to make him
invulnerable, and he went in, heels and all. Some of the stone-bounds to his
farm which he set up are standing to-day, with his initials cut in them.</p>
<p>The ecclesiastical history of this town interested us somewhat. It appears that
“they very early built a small meeting-house, twenty feet square, with a
thatched roof through which they might fire their muskets,”—of
course, at the Devil. “In 1662, the town agreed that a part of every
whale cast on shore be appropriated for the support of the ministry.” No
doubt there seemed to be some propriety in thus leaving the support of the
ministers to Providence, whose servants they are, and who alone rules the
storms; for, when few whales were cast up, they might suspect that their
worship was not acceptable. The ministers must have sat upon the cliffs in
every storm, and watched the shore with anxiety. And, for my part, if I were a
minister I would rather trust to the bowels of the billows, on the back-side of
Cape Cod, to cast up a whale for me, than to the generosity of many a country
parish that I know. You cannot say of a country minister’s salary,
commonly, that it is “very like a whale.” Nevertheless, the
minister who depended on whales cast up must have had a trying time of it. I
would rather have gone to the Falkland Isles with a harpoon, and done with it.
Think of a w hale having the breath of life beaten out of him by a storm, and
dragging in over the bars and guzzles, for the support of the ministry! What a
consolation it must have been to him! I have heard of a minister, who had been
a fisherman, being settled in Bridgewater for as long a time as he could tell a
cod from a haddock. Generous as it seems, this condition would empty most
country pulpits forthwith, for it is long since the fishers of men were
fishermen. Also, a duty was put on mackerel here to support a free-school; in
other words, the mackerel-school was taxed in order that the children’s
school might be free. “In 1665 the Court passed a law to inflict corporal
punishment on all persons, who resided in the towns of this government, who
denied the Scriptures.” Think of a man being whipped on a spring morning
till he was constrained to confess that the Scriptures were true! “It was
also voted by the town that all persons who should stand out of the
meeting-house during the time of divine service should be set in the
stocks.” It behooved such a town to see that sitting in the meeting-house
was nothing akin to sitting in the stocks, lest the penalty of obedience to the
law might be greater than that of disobedience. This was the Eastham famous of
late years for its camp-meetings, held in a grove near by, to which thousands
flock from all parts of the Bay. We conjectured that the reason for the perhaps
unusual, if not unhealthful, development of the religious sentiment here was
the fact that a large portion of the population are women whose husbands and
sons are either abroad on the sea, or else drowned, and there is nobody but
they and the ministers left behind. The old account says that “hysteric
fits are very common in Orleans, Eastham, and the towns below, particularly on
Sunday, in the times of divine service. When one woman is affected, five or six
others generally sympathize with her; and the congregation is thrown into the
utmost confusion. Several old men suppose, unphilosophically and uncharitably,
perhaps, that the will is partly concerned, and that ridicule and threats would
have a tendency to prevent the evil.” How this is now we did not learn.
We saw one singularly masculine woman, however, in a house on this very plain,
who did not look as if she was ever troubled with hysterics, or sympathized
with those that were; or, perchance, life itself was to her a hysteric
fit,—a Nauset woman, of a hardness and coarseness such as no man ever
possesses or suggests. It was enough to see the vertebrae and sinews of her
neck, and her set jaws of iron, which would have bitten a board-nail in two in
their ordinary action,—braced against the world, talking like a
man-of-war’s-man in petticoats, or as if shouting to you through a
breaker; who looked as if it made her head ache to live; hard enough for any
enormity. I looked upon her as one who had committed infanticide; who never had
a brother, unless it were some wee thins: that died in infancy,—for what
need of him?—and whose father must have died before she was born. This
woman told us that the camp-meetings were not held the previous summer for fear
of introducing the cholera, and that they would have been held earlier this
summer, but the rye was so backward that straw would not have been re adv for
them; for they He in straw. There are sometimes one hundred and fifty ministers
(!) and five thousand hearers assembled. The ground, which is called Millennium
Grove, is owned by a company in Boston, and is the most suitable, or rather
unsuitable, for this purpose of any that I saw on the Cape. It is fenced, and
the frames of the tents are at all times to be seen interspersed among the
oaks. They have an oven and a pump, and keep all their kitchen utensils and
tent coverings and furniture in a permanent building on the spot. They select a
time for their meetings when the moon is full. A man is appointed to clear out
the pump a week beforehand, while the ministers are clearing their throats;
but, probably, the latter do not always deliver as pure a stream as the former.
I saw the heaps of clam-shells left under the tables, where they had feasted in
previous summers, and supposed, of course, that that was the work of the
unconverted, or the backsliders and scoffers. It looked as if a camp-meeting
must be a singular combination of a prayer-meeting and a picnic.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus09"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/millennium.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="347" alt="Millennium Grove camp-meeting grounds" title="" /> <p class="caption">Millennium Grove camp-meeting grounds</p> </div>
<p>The first minister settled here was the Rev. Samuel Treat, in 1672, a gentleman
who is said to be “entitled to a distinguished rank among the evangelists
of New England.” He converted many Indians, as well as white men, in his
day, and translated the Confession of Faith into the Nauset language. These
were the Indians concerning whom their first teacher, Richard Bourne, wrote to
Gookin, in 1674, that he had been to see one who was sick, “and there
came from him very savory and heavenly expressions,” but, with regard to
the mass of them, he says, “the truth is, that many of them are very
loose in their course, to my heartbreaking sorrow.” Mr. Treat is
described as a Calvinist of the strictest kind, not one of those who, by giving
up or explaining away, become like a porcupine disarmed of its quills, but a
consistent Calvinist, who can dart his quills to a distance and courageously
defend himself. There exists a volume of his sermons in manuscript,
“which,” says a commentator, “appear to have been designed
for publication.” I quote the following sentences at second hand, from a
Discourse on Luke xvi. 23, addressed to sinners:—</p>
<p>“Thou must erelong go to the bottomless pit. Hell hath enlarged herself,
and is ready to receive thee. There is room enough for thy entertainment....</p>
<p>“Consider, thou art going to a place prepared by God on purpose to exalt
his justice in,—a place made for no other employment but torments. Hell
is God’s house of correction; and, remember, God doth all things like
himself. When God would show his justice, and what is the weight of his wrath,
he makes a hell where it shall, indeed, appear to purpose.... Woe to thy soul
when thou shalt be set up as a butt for the arrows of the Almighty....</p>
<p>“Consider, God himself shall be the principal agent in thy
misery,—his breath is the bellows which blows up the flame of hell
forever;—and if he punish thee, if he meet thee in his fury, he will not
meet thee as a man; he will give thee an omnipotent blow.”</p>
<p>“Some think sinning ends with this life; but it is a mistake. The
creature is held under an everlasting law; the damned increase in sin in hell.
Possibly, the mention of this may please thee. But, remember, there shall be no
pleasant sins there; no eating, drinking, singing, dancing, wanton dalliance,
and drinking stolen waters, but damned sins, bitter, hellish sins; sins
exasperated by torments, cursing God, spite, rage, and blasphemy.—The
guilt of all thy sins shall be laid upon thy soul, and be made so many heaps of
fuel....</p>
<p>“Sinner, I beseech thee, realize the truth of these things. Do not go
about to dream that this is derogatory to God’s mercy, and nothing but a
vain fable to scare children out of their wits withal. God can be merciful,
though he make thee miserable. He shall have monuments enough of that precious
attribute, shining like stars in the place of glory, and singing eternal
hallelujahs to the praise of Him that redeemed them, though, to exalt the power
of his justice, he damn sinners heaps upon heaps.”</p>
<p>“But,” continues the same writer, “with the advantage of
proclaiming the doctrine of terror, which is naturally productive of a sublime
and impressive style of eloquence (‘Triumphat ventoso gloriæ curru
orator, qui pectus angit, irritat, et implet terroribus.’ Vid. Burnet, De
Stat. Mort., p. 309), he could not attain the character of a popular preacher.
His voice was so loud that it could be heard at a great distance from the
meeting-house, even amidst the shrieks of hysterical women, and the winds that
howled over the plains of Nauset; but there was no more music in it than in the
discordant sounds with which it was mingled.”</p>
<p>“The effect of such preaching,” it is said, “was that his
hearers were several times, in the course of his ministry, awakened and
alarmed; and on one occasion a comparatively innocent young man was frightened
nearly out of his wits, and Mr. Treat had to exert himself to make hell seem
somewhat cooler to him”; yet we are assured that “Treat’s
manners were cheerful, his conversation pleasant, and sometimes facetious, but
always decent. He was fond of a stroke of humor, and a practical joke, and
manifested his relish for them by long and loud fits of laughter.”</p>
<p>This was the man of whom a well-known anecdote is told, which doubtless many of
my readers have heard, but which, nevertheless, I will venture to quote:—</p>
<p>“After his marriage with the daughter of Mr. Willard (pastor of the South
Church in Boston), he was sometimes invited by that gentleman to preach in his
pulpit. Mr. Willard possessed a graceful delivery, a masculine and harmonious
voice; and, though he did not gain much reputation by his ‘Body of
Divinity,’ which is frequently sneered at, particularly by those who have
read it, yet in his sermons are strength of thought and energy of language. The
natural consequence was that he was generally admired. Mr. Treat having
preached one of his best discourses to the congregation of his father-in-law,
in his usual unhappy manner, excited universal disgust; and several nice judges
waited on Mr. Willard, and begged that Mr. Treat, who was a worthy, pious man,
it was true, but a wretched preacher, might never be invited into his pulpit
again. To this request Mr. Willard made no reply; but he desired his son-in-law
to lend him the discourse; which being left with him, he delivered it without
alteration to his people a few weeks after. They ran to Mr. Willard and
requested a copy for the press. ‘See the difference,’ they cried,
‘between yourself and your son-in-law; you have preached a sermon on the
same text as Mr. Treat’s, but whilst his was contemptible, yours is
excellent.’ As is observed in a note, ‘Mr. Willard, after producing
the sermon in the handwriting of Mr. Treat, might have addressed these sage
critics in the words of Phaedrus,</p>
<p class="poem">
“‘En hic declarat, quales sitis judices.’”<SPAN href="#linknote-3" name="linknoteref-3"><sup>[2]</sup></SPAN></p>
<p>Mr. Treat died of a stroke of the palsy, just after the memorable storm known
as the Great Snow, which left the ground around his house entirely bare, but
heaped up the snow in the road to an uncommon height. Through this an arched
way was dug, by which the Indians bore his bod to the grave.</p>
<p>The reader will imagine us, all the while, steadily traversing that extensive
plain in a direction a little north of east toward Nauset Beach, and reading
under our umbrellas as we sailed, while it blowed hard with mingled mist and
rain, as if we were approaching a fit anniversary of Mr. Treat’s funeral.
We fancied that it was such a moor as that on which somebody perished in the
snow, as is related in the “Lights and Shadows of Scottish Life.”</p>
<p>The next minister settled here was the “Rev. Samuel Osborn, who was born
in Ireland, and educated at the University of Dublin.” He is said to have
been “A man of wisdom and virtue,” and taught his people the use of
peat, and the art of drying and preparing it, which as they had scarcely any
other fuel, was a great blessing to them. He also introduced improvements in
agriculture. But, notwithstanding his many services, as he embraced the
religion of Arminius, some of his flock became dissatisfied. At length, an
ecclesiastical council, consisting of ten ministers, with their churches, sat
upon him, and they, naturally enough, spoiled his usefulness. The council
convened at the desire of two divine philosophers,—Joseph Doane and
Nathaniel Freeman.</p>
<p>In their report they say, “It appears to the council that the Rev. Mr.
Osborn hath, in his preaching to this people, said, that what Christ did and
suffered doth nothing abate or diminish our obligation to obey the law of God,
and that Christ’s suffering and obedience were for himself; both parts of
which, we think, contain dangerous error.”</p>
<p>“Also: ‘It hath been said, and doth appear to this council, that
the Rev. Mr. Osborn, both in public and in private, asserted that there are no
promises in the Bible but what are conditional, which we think, also, to be an
error, and do say that there are promises which are absolute and without any
condition,—such as the promise of a new heart, and that he will write his
law in our hearts.’”</p>
<p>“Also, they say, ‘it hath been alleged, and doth appear to us, that
Mr. Osborn hath declared, that <i>obedience</i> is a considerable <i>cause</i>
of a person’s justification, which, we think, contains very dangerous
error.’”</p>
<p>And many the like distinctions they made, such as some of my readers, probably,
are more familiar with than I am. So, far in the East, among the Yezidis, or
Worshippers of the Devil, so-called, the Chaldaeans, and others, according to
the testimony of travellers, you may still hear these remarkable disputations
on doctrinal points going on. Osborn was, accordingly, dismissed, and he
removed to Boston, where he kept school for many years. But he was fully
justified, methinks, by his works in the peat-meadow; one proof of which is,
that he lived to be between ninety and one hundred years old.</p>
<p>The next minister was the Rev. Benjamin Webb, of whom, though a neighboring
clergy-man pronounced him “the best man and the best minister whom he
ever knew,” yet the historian says that,</p>
<p>“As he spent his days in the uniform discharge of his duty (it reminds
one of a country muster) and there were no shades to give relief to his
character, not much can be said of him. (Pity the Devil did not plant a few
shade-trees along his avenues.) His heart was as pure as the new-fallen snow,
which completely covers every dark spot in a field; his mind was as serene as
the sky in a mild evening in June, when the moon shines without a cloud. Name
any virtue, and that virtue he practised; name any vice, and that vice he
shunned. But if peculiar qualities marked his character, they were his
humility, his gentleness, and his love of God. The people had long been taught
by a son of thunder (Mr. Treat): in him they were instructed by a son of
consolation, who sweetly allured them to virtue by soft persuasion, and by
exhibiting the mercy of the Supreme Being; for his thoughts were so much in
heaven that they seldom descended to the dismal regions below; and though of
the same religious sentiments as Mr. Treat, yet his attention was turned to
those glad tidings of great joy which a Saviour came to publish.”</p>
<p>We were interested to hear that such a man had trodden the plains of Nauset.</p>
<p>Turning over further in our book, our eyes fell on the name of the Rev.
Jonathan Bascom, of Orleans; “Senex emunctæ naris, doctus, et auctor
elegantium verborum, facetus, et dulcis festique sermonis.” And, again,
on that of the Rev. Nathan Stone, of Dennis: “Vir humilis, mitis,
blandus, advenarum hospes; (there was need of him there;) suis commodis in
terrâ non studens, reconditis thesauris in cÅ“lo.” An easy virtue that,
there, for methinks no inhabitant of Dennis could be very studious about his
earthly commodity, but must regard the bulk of his treasures as in heaven. But
probably the most just and pertinent character of all is that which appears to
be given to the Rev. Ephraim Briggs, of Chatham, in the language of the later
Romans, “<i>Seip, sepoese, sepoemese, wechekum</i>,”—which
not being interpreted, we know not what it means, though we have no doubt it
occurs somewhere in the Scriptures, probably in the Apostle Eliot’s
Epistle to the Nipmucks.</p>
<p>Let no one think that I do not love the old ministers. They were, probably, the
best men of their generation, and they deserve that their biographies should
fill the pages of the town histories. If I could but hear the “glad
tidings” of which they tell, and which, perchance, they heard, I might
write in a worthier strain than this.</p>
<p>There was no better way to make the reader realize how wide and peculiar that
plain was, and how long it took to traverse it, than by inserting these
extracts in the midst of my narrative.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-2" id="linknote-2"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-2">[1]</SPAN>
They touched after this at a place called Mattachiest, where they got more
corn; but their shallop being cast away in a storm, the Governor was obliged to
return to Plymouth on foot, fifty miles through the woods. According to
Mourt’s Relation, “he came safely home, though weary and
<i>surbated</i>,” that is, foot-sore. (Ital. <i>sobattere</i>, Lat.
<i>sub</i> or <i>solea battere</i>, to bruise the soles of the feet; v. Dic.
Not “from <i>acerbatus</i>, embittered or aggrieved,” as one
commentator on this passage supposes.) This word is of very rare occurrence,
being applied only to governors and persons of like description, who are in
that predicament; though such generally have considerable mileage allowed them,
and might save their soles if they cared.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-3" id="linknote-3"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-3">[2]</SPAN>
Lib. v. Fab. 5.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap04"></SPAN>IV<br/> THE BEACH</h2>
<p>At length we reached the seemingly retreating boundary of the plain, and
entered what had appeared at a distance an upland marsh, but proved to be dry
sand covered with Beach-grass, the Bearberry, Bayberry, Shrub-oaks, and
Beach-plum, slightly ascending as we approached the shore; then, crossing over
a belt of sand on which nothing grew, though the roar of the sea sounded
scarcely louder than before, and we were prepared to go half a mile farther, we
suddenly stood on the edge of a bluff overlooking the Atlantic. Far below us
was the beach, from half a dozen to a dozen rods in width, with a long line of
breakers rushing to the strand. The sea was exceedingly dark and stormy, the
sky completely overcast, the clouds still dropping rain, and the wind seemed to
blow not so much as the exciting cause, as from sympathy with the already
agitated ocean. The waves broke on the bars at some distance from the shore,
and curving green or yellow as if over so many unseen dams, ten or twelve feet
high, like a thousand waterfalls, rolled in foam to the sand. There was nothing
but that savage ocean between us and Europe.</p>
<p>Having got down the bank, and as close to the water as we could, where the sand
was the hardest, leaving the Nauset Lights behind us, we began to walk
leisurely up the beach, in a northwest direction, towards Provincetown, which
was about twenty-five miles distant, still sailing under our umbrellas with a
strong aft wind, admiring in silence, as we walked, the great force of the
ocean stream,—</p>
<p class="center">
ποταμοῖο μέγα
σθένος
Ὠκεανοῖο.</p>
<p>The white breakers were rushing to the shore; the foam ran up the sand, and
then ran back as far as we could see (and we imagined how much farther along
the Atlantic coast, before and behind us), as regularly, to compare great
things with small, as the master of a choir beats time with his white wand; and
ever and anon a higher wave caused us hastily to deviate from our path, and we
looked back on our tracks filled with water and foam. The breakers looked like
droves of a thousand wild horses of Neptune, rushing to the shore, with their
white manes streaming far behind; and when at length the sun shone for a
moment, their manes were rainbow-tinted. Also, the long kelp-weed was tossed up
from time to time, like the tails of sea-cows sporting in the brine.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus10"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/citizen.jpg" width-obs="313" height-obs="450" alt="A Cape Cod citizen" title="" /> <p class="caption">A Cape Cod citizen</p> </div>
<p>There was not a sail in sight, and we saw none that day,—for they had all
sought harbors in the late storm, and had not been able to get out again; and
the only human beings whom we saw on the beach for several days were one or two
wreckers looking for drift-wood, and fragments of wrecked vessels. After an
easterly storm in the spring, this beach is sometimes strewn with eastern wood
from one end to the other, which, as it belongs to him who saves it, and the
Cape is nearly destitute of wood, is a Godsend to the inhabitants. We soon met
one of these wreckers,—a regular Cape Cod man, with whom we parleyed,
with a bleached and weather-beaten face, within whose wrinkles I distinguished
no particular feature. It was like an old sail endowed with life,—a
hanging cliff of weather-beaten flesh,—like one of the clay boulders
which occurred in that sand-bank. He had on a hat which had seen salt water,
and a coat of many pieces and colors, though it was mainly the color of the
beach, as if it had been sanded. His variegated back—for his coat had
many patches, even between the shoulders—was a rich study to us, when we
had passed him and looked round. It might have been dishonorable for him to
have so many scars behind, it is true, if he had not had many more and more
serious ones in front. He looked as if he sometimes saw a doughnut, but never
descended to comfort; too grave to laugh, too tough to cry; as indifferent as a
clam,—like a sea-clam with hat on and legs, that was out walking the
strand. He may have been one of the Pilgrims,—Peregrine White, at
least,—who has kept on the back-side of the Cape, and let the centuries
go by. He was looking for wrecks, old logs, water-logged and covered with
barnacles, or bits of boards and joists, even chips, which he drew out of the
reach of the tide, and stacked up to dry. When the log was too large to carry
far, he cut it up where the last wave had left it, or rolling it a few feet
appropriated it by sticking two sticks into the ground crosswise above it. Some
rotten trunk, which in Maine cumbers the ground, and is, perchance, thrown into
the water on purpose, is here thus carefully picked up, split and dried, and
husbanded. Before winter the wrecker painfully carries these things up the bank
on his shoulders by a long diagonal slanting path made with a hoe in the sand,
if there is no hollow at hand. You may see his hooked pike-staff always lying
on the bank ready for use. He is the true monarch of the beach, whose
“right there is none to dispute,” and he is as much identified with
it as a beach-bird.</p>
<p>Crantz, in his account of Greenland, quotes Dalagen’s relation of the
ways and usages of the Greenlanders, and says, “Whoever finds driftwood,
or the spoils of a shipwreck on the strand, enjoys it as his own, though, he
does not live there. But he must haul it ashore and lay a stone upon it, as a
token that some one has taken possession of it, and this stone is the deed of
security, for no other Greenlander will offer to meddle with it
afterwards.” Such is the instinctive law of nations. We have also this
account of drift-wood in Crantz: “As he (the Founder of Nature) has
denied this frigid rocky region the growth of trees, he has bid the streams of
the Ocean to convey to its shores a great deal of wood, which accordingly comes
floating thither, part without ice, but the most part along with it, and lodges
itself between the islands. Were it not for this, we Europeans should have no
wood to burn there, and the poor Greenlanders (who, it is true, do not use
wood, but train, for burning) would, however, have no wood to roof their
houses, to erect their tents, as also to build their boats, and to shaft their
arrows (yet there grew some small but crooked alders, &c.), by which they
must procure their maintenance, clothing and train for warmth, light, and
cooking. Among this wood are great trees torn up by the roots, which by driving
up and down for many years and rubbing on the ice, are quite bare of branches
and bark, and corroded with great wood-worms. A small part of this drift-wood
are willows, alder and birch trees, which come out of the bays in the south of
(<i>i.e.</i> Greenland); also large trunks of aspen-trees, which must come from
a greater distance; but the greatest part is pine and fir. We find also a good
deal of a sort of wood finely veined, with few branches; this I fancy is
larch-wood, which likes to decorate the sides of lofty, stony mountains. There
is also a solid, reddish wood, of a more agreeable fragrance than the common
fir, with visible cross-veins; which I take to be the same species as the
beautiful silver-firs, or <i>zirbel</i>, that have the smell of cedar, and grow
on the high Grison hills, and the Switzers wainscot their rooms with
them.” The wrecker directed us to a slight depression, called
Snow’s Hollow, by which we ascended the bank,—for elsewhere, if not
difficult, it was inconvenient to climb it on ac-count of the sliding sand,
which filled our shoes.</p>
<p>This sand-bank—the backbone of the Cape—rose directly from the
beach to the height of a hundred feet or more above the ocean. It was with
singular emotions that we first stood upon it and discovered what a place we
had chosen to walk on. On our right, beneath us, was the beach of smooth and
gently sloping sand, a dozen rods in width; next, the endless series of white
breakers; further still, the light green water over the bar, which runs the
whole length of the forearm of the Cape, and beyond this stretched the
unwearied and illimitable ocean. On our left, extending back from the very edge
of the bank, was a perfect desert of shining sand, from thirty to eighty rods
in width, skirted in the distance by small sand-hills fifteen or twenty feet
high; between which, however, in some places, the sand penetrated as much
farther. Next commenced the region of vegetation—a succession of small
hills and valleys covered with shrubbery, now glowing with the brightest
imaginable autumnal tints; and beyond this were seen, here and there, the
waters of the bay. Here, in Wellfleet, this pure sand plateau, known to sailors
as the Table Lands of Eastham, on account of its appearance, as seen from the
ocean, and because it once made a part of that town,—full fifty rods in
width, and in many places much more, and sometimes full one hundred and fifty
feet above the ocean,—stretched away northward from the southern boundary
of the town, without a particle of vegetation,—as level almost as a
table,—for two and a half or three miles, or as far as the eye could
reach; slightly rising towards the ocean, then stooping to the beach, by as
steep a slope as sand could lie on, and as regular as a military engineer could
desire. It was like the escarped rampart of a stupendous fortress, whose glacis
was the beach, and whose champaign the ocean.—From its surface we
overlooked the greater part of the Cape. In short, we were traversing a desert,
with the view of an autumnal landscape of extraordinary brilliancy, a sort of
Promised Land, on the one hand, and the ocean on the other. Yet, though the
prospect was so extensive, and the country for the most part destitute of
trees, a house was rarely visible,—we never saw one from the
beach,—and the solitude was that of the ocean and the desert combined. A
thousand men could not have seriously interrupted it, but would have been lost
in the vastness of the scenery as their footsteps in the sand.</p>
<p>The whole coast is so free from rocks, that we saw but one or two for more than
twenty miles. The sand was soft like the beach, and trying to the eyes when the
sun shone. A few piles of drift-wood, which some wreckers had painfully brought
up the bank and stacked up there to dry, being the only objects in the desert,
looked indefinitely large and distant, even like wigwams, though, when we stood
near them, they proved to be insignificant little “jags” of wood.</p>
<p>For sixteen miles, commencing at the Nauset Lights, the bank held its height,
though farther north it was not so level as here, but interrupted by slight
hollows, and the patches of Beach-grass and Bayberry frequently crept into the
sand to its edge. There are some pages entitled “A description of the
Eastern Coast of the County of Barnstable,” printed in 1802, pointing out
the spots on which the Trustees of the Humane Society have erected huts called
Charity or Humane Houses, “and other places where shipwrecked seamen may
look for shelter.” Two thousand copies of this were dispersed, that every
vessel which frequented this coast might be provided with one. I have read this
Shipwrecked Seaman’s Manual with a melancholy kind of interest,—for
the sound of the surf, or, you might say, the moaning of the sea, is heard all
through it, as if its author were the sole survivor of a shipwreck himself. Of
this part of the coast he says: “This highland approaches the ocean with
steep and lofty banks, which it is extremely difficult to climb, especially in
a storm. In violent tempests, during very high tides, the sea breaks against
the foot of them, rendering it then unsafe to walk on the strand which lies
between them and the ocean. Should the seaman succeed in his attempt to ascend
them, he must forbear to penetrate into the country, as houses are generally so
remote that they would escape his research during the night; he must pass on to
the valleys by which the banks are intersected. These valleys, which the
inhabitants call Hollows, run at right angles with the shore, and in the middle
or lowest part of them a road leads from the dwelling-houses to the sea.”
By the <i>word</i> road must not always be understood a visible cart-track.</p>
<p>There were these two roads for us,—an upper and a lower one,—the
bank and the beach; both stretching twenty-eight miles northwest, from Nauset
Harbor to Race Point, without a single opening into the beach, and with hardly
a serious interruption of the desert. If you were to ford the narrow and
shallow inlet at Nauset Harbor, where there is not more than eight feet of
water on the bar at full sea, you might walk ten or twelve miles farther, which
would make a beach forty miles long,—and the bank and beach, on the east
side of Nantucket, are but a continuation of these. I was comparatively
satisfied. There I had got the Cape under me, as much as if I were riding it
bare-backed. It was not as on the map, or seen from the stagecoach; but there I
found it all out of doors, huge and real, Cape Cod! as it cannot be represented
on a map, color it as you will; the thing itself, than which there is nothing
more like it, no truer picture or account; which you cannot go farther and see.
I cannot remember what I thought before that it was. They commonly celebrate
those beaches only which have a hotel on them, not those which have a Humane
house alone. But I wished to see that seashore where man’s works are
wrecks; to put up at the true Atlantic House, where the ocean is land-lord as
well as sea-lord, and comes ashore without a wharf for the landing; where the
crumbling land is the only invalid, or at best is but dry land, and that is all
you can say of it.</p>
<p>We walked on quite at our leisure, now on the beach, now on the
bank,—sitting from time to time on some damp log, maple or yellow birch,
which had long followed the seas, but had now at last settled on land; or under
the lee of a sandhill, on the bank, that we might gaze steadily on the ocean.
The bank was so steep that, where there was no danger of its caving, we sat on
its edge, as on a bench. It was difficult for us landsmen to look out over the
ocean without imagining land in the horizon; yet the clouds appeared to hang
low over it, and rest on the water as they never do on the land, perhaps on
account of the great distance to which we saw. The sand was not without
advantage, for, though it was “heavy” walking in it, it was soft to
the feet; and, notwithstanding that it had been raining nearly two days, when
it held up for half an hour, the sides of the sand-hills, which were porous and
sliding, afforded a dry seat. All the aspects of this desert are beautiful,
whether you behold it in fair weather or foul, or when the sun is just breaking
out after a storm, and shining on its moist surface in the distance, it is so
white, and pure, and level, and each slight inequality and track is so
distinctly revealed; and when your eyes slide off this, they fall on the ocean.
In summer the mackerel gulls—which here have their nests among the
neighboring sand-hills—pursue the traveller anxiously, now and then
diving close to his head with a squeak, and he may see them, like swallows,
chase some crow which has been feeding on the beach, almost across the Cape.</p>
<p>Though for some time I have not spoken of the roaring of the breakers, and the
ceaseless flux and reflux of the waves, yet they did not for a moment cease to
dash and roar, with such a tumult that if you had been there, you could
scarcely have heard my voice the while; and they are dashing and roaring this
very moment, though it may be with less din and violence, for there the sea
never rests. We were wholly absorbed by this spectacle and tumult, and like
Chryses, though in a different mood from him, we walked silent along the shore
of the resounding sea,</p>
<p class="center">
Βῆ δ’ ἀκέων
παρὰ θῖνα
πολυφλοίσβοιο
θαλάσσης.<SPAN href="#linknote-4"
name="linknoteref-4"><sup>[1]</sup></SPAN></p>
<p>I put in a little Greek now and then, partly because it sounds so much like the
ocean,—though I doubt if Homer’s <i>Mediterranean</i> Sea ever
sounded so loud as this.</p>
<p>The attention of those who frequent the camp-meetings at Eastham is said to be
divided between the preaching of the Methodists and the preaching of the
billows on the back-side of the Cape, for they all stream over here in the
course of their stay. I trust that in this case the loudest voice carries it.
With what effect may we suppose the ocean to say, “My hearers!” to
the multitude on the bank! On that side some John N. Maffit; on this, the
Reverend Poluphloisboios Thalassa.</p>
<p>There was but little weed cast up here, and that kelp chiefly, there being
scarcely a rock for rockweed to adhere to. Who has not had a vision from some
vessel’s deck, when he had still his land-legs on, of this great brown
apron, drifting half upright, and quite submerged through the green water,
clasping a stone or a deep-sea mussel in its unearthly fingers? I have seen it
carrying a stone half as large as my head. We sometimes watched a mass of this
cable-like weed, as it was tossed up on the crest of a breaker, waiting with
interest to see it come in, as if there were some treasure buoyed up by it; but
we were always surprised and disappointed at the insignificance of the mass
which had attracted us. As we looked out over the water, the smallest objects
floating on it appeared indefinitely large, we were so impressed by the
vastness of the ocean, and each one bore so large a proportion to the whole
ocean, which we saw. We were so often disappointed in the size of such things
as came ashore, the ridiculous bits of wood or weed, with which the ocean
labored, that we began to doubt whether the Atlantic itself would bear a still
closer inspection, and wold not turn out to be a but small pond, if it should
come ashore to us. This kelp, oar-weed, tangle, devils-apron, sole-leather, or
ribbon-weed,—as various species are called,—appeared to us a
singularly marine and fabulous product, a lit invention for Neptune to adorn
his car with, or a freak of Proteus. All that is told of the sea has a fabulous
sound to an inhabitant of the land, and all its products have a certain
fabulous quality, as if they belonged to another planet, from sea-weed to a
sailor’s yarn, or a fish-story. In this element the animal and vegetable
kingdoms meet and are strangely mingled. One species of kelp, according to Bory
St. Vincent, has a stem fifteen hundred feet long, and hence is the longest
vegetable known, and a brig’s crew spent two days to no purpose
collecting the trunks of another kind cast ashore on the Falkland Islands,
mistaking it for drift-wood. (See Harvey on <i>Algæ</i>) This species looked
almost edible; at least, I thought that if I were starving I would try it. One
sailor told me that the cows ate it. It cut like cheese: for I took the
earliest opportunity to sit down and deliberately whittle up a fathom or two of
it, that I might become more intimately acquainted with it, see how it cut, and
if it were hollow all the way through. The blade looked like a broad belt,
whose edges had been quilled, or as if stretched by hammering, and it was also
twisted spirally. The extremity was generally worn and ragged from the lashing
of the waves. A piece of the stem which I carried home shrunk to one quarter of
its size a week afterward, and was completely covered with crystals of salt
like frost. The reader will excuse my greenness,—though it is not
sea-greenness, like his, perchance,—for I live by a river-shore, where
this weed does not wash up. When we consider in what meadows it grew. and how
it was raked, and in what kind of hay weather got in or out, we may well be
curious about it. One who is weatherwise has given the following account of the
matter.</p>
<p class="poem">
“When descends on the Atlantic<br/>
The gigantic<br/>
Storm-wind of the equinox,<br/>
Landward in his wrath he scourges<br/>
The toiling surges,<br/>
Laden with sea-weed from the rocks.<br/>
<br/>
“From Bermuda’s reefs, from edges<br/>
Of sunken ledges,<br/>
On some far-off bright Azore;<br/>
From Bahama and the dashing,<br/>
Silver-flashing<br/>
Surges of San Salvador;<br/>
<br/>
“From the trembling surf that buries<br/>
The Orkneyan Skerries.<br/>
Answering the hoarse Hebrides;<br/>
And from wrecks and ships and drifting<br/>
Spars, uplifting<br/>
On the desolate rainy seas;<br/>
<br/>
“Ever drifting, drifting, drifting<br/>
On the shifting<br/>
Currents of the restless main.”</p>
<p>But he was not thinking of this shore, when he added:—</p>
<p class="poem">
“Till, in sheltered coves and reaches<br/>
Of sandy beaches,<br/>
All have found repose again.”</p>
<p><i>These</i> weeds were the symbols of those grotesque and fabulous thoughts
which have not yet got into the sheltered coves of literature.</p>
<p class="poem">
“Ever drifting, drifting, drifting<br/>
On the shifting<br/>
Currents of the restless heart,”<br/>
<i>And not yet</i> “in books recorded<br/>
They, like hoarded<br/>
Household words, no more depart.”</p>
<p>The beach was also strewn with beautiful sea-jellies, which the wreckers called
Sun-squall, one of the lowest forms of animal life, some white, some
wine-colored, and a foot in diameter. I at first thought that they were a
tender part of some marine monster, which the storm or some other foe had
mangled. What right has the sea to bear in its bosom such tender things as
sea-jellies and mosses, when it has such a boisterous shore that the stoutest
fabrics are wrecked against it? Strange that it should undertake to dandle such
delicate children in its arm. I did not at first recognize these for the same
which I had formerly seen in myriads in Boston Harbor, rising, with a waving
motion, to the surface, as if to meet the sun, and discoloring the waters far
and wide, so that I seemed to be sailing through a mere sunfish soup. They say
that when you endeavor to take one up, it will spill out the other side of your
hand like quicksilver. Before the land rose out of the ocean, and became
<i>dry</i> land, chaos reigned; and between high and low water mark, where she
is partially disrobed and rising, a sort of chaos reigns still, which only
anomalous creatures can inhabit. Mackerel-gulls were all the while flying over
our heads and amid the breakers, sometimes two white ones pursuing a black one;
quite at home in the storm, though they are as delicate organizations as
sea-jellies and mosses; and we saw that they were adapted to their
circumstances rather by their spirits than their bodies. Theirs must be an
essentially wilder, that is, less human, nature than that of larks and robins.
Their note was like the sound of some vibrating metal, and harmonized well with
the scenery and the roar of the surf, as if one had rudely touched the strings
of the lyre, which ever lies on the shore; a ragged shred of ocean music tossed
aloft on the spray. But if I were required to name a sound the remembrance of
which most perfectly revives the impression which the beach has made, it would
be the dreary peep of the piping plover (<i>Charadrius melodus</i>) which
haunts there. Their voices, too, are heard as a fugacious part in the dirge
which is ever played along the shore for those mariners who have been lost in
the deep since first it was created. But through all this dreariness we seemed
to have a pure and unqualified strain of eternal melody, for always the same
strain which is a dirge to one household is a morning song of rejoicing to
another.</p>
<p>A remarkable method of catching gulls, derived from the Indians, was practised
in Wellfleet in 1794. “The Gull House,” it is said, “is built
with crotchets, fixed in the ground on the beach,” poles being stretched
across for the top, and the sides made close with stakes and seaweed.
“The poles on the top are covered with lean whale. The man being placed
within, is not discovered by the fowls, and while they are contending for and
eating the flesh, he draws them in, one by one, between the poles, until he has
collected forty or fifty.” Hence, perchance, a man is said to be
<i>gulled</i>, when he is <i>taken in</i>. We read that one “sort of
gulls is called by the Dutch <i>mallemucke, i.e.</i> the foolish fly, because
they fall upon a whale as eagerly as a fly, and, indeed, all gulls are
foolishly bold and easy to be shot. The Norwegians call this bird
<i>havhest</i>, sea-horse (and the English translator says, it is probably what
we call boobies). If they have eaten too much, they throw it up, and eat it
again till they are tired. It is this habit in the gulls of parting with their
property [disgorging the contents of their stomachs to the skuas], which has
given rise to the terms gull, guller, and gulling, among men.” We also
read that they used to kill small birds which roosted on the beach at night, by
making a fire with hog’s lard in a frying-pan. The Indians probably used
pine torches; the birds flocked to the light, and were knocked down with a
stick. We noticed holes dug near the edge of the bank, where gunners conceal
themselves to shoot the large gulls which coast up and down a-fishing, for
these are considered good to eat.</p>
<p>We found some large clams of the species <i>Mactra solidissima</i>, which the
storm had torn up from the bottom, and cast ashore. I selected one of the
largest, about six inches in length, and carried it along, thinking to try an
experiment on it. We soon after met a wrecker, with a grapple and a rope, who
said that he was looking for tow cloth, which had made part of the cargo of the
ship <i>Franklin</i>, which was wrecked here in the spring, at which time nine
or ten lives were lost. The reader may remember this wreck, from the
circumstance that a letter was found in the captain’s valise, which
washed ashore, directing him to wreck the vessel before he got to America, and
from the trial which took place in consequence. The wrecker said that tow cloth
was still cast up in such storms as this. He also told us that the clam which I
had was the sea-clam, or hen, and was good to eat. We took our nooning under a
sand-hill, covered with beach-grass, in a dreary little hollow, on the top of
the bank, while it alternately rained and shined. There, having reduced some
damp drift-wood, which I had picked up on the shore, to shavings with my knife,
I kindled a fire with a match and some paper and cooked my clam on the embers
for my dinner; for breakfast was commonly the only meal which I took in a house
on this excursion. When the clam was done, one valve held the meat and the
other the liquor. Though it was very tough, I found it sweet and savory, and
ate <i>the whole</i> with a relish. Indeed, with the addition of a cracker or
two, it would have been a bountiful dinner. I noticed that the shells were such
as I had seen in the sugar-kit at home. Tied to a stick, they formerly made the
Indian’s hoe hereabouts.</p>
<p>At length, by mid-afternoon, after we had had two or three rainbows over the
sea, the showers ceased, and the heavens gradually cleared up, though the wind
still blowed as hard and the breakers ran as high as before. Keeping on, we
soon after came to a Charity-house, which we looked into to see how the
shipwrecked mariner might fare. Far away in some desolate hollow by the
sea-side, just within the bank, stands a lonely building on piles driven into
the sand, with a slight nail put through the staple, which a freezing man can
bend, with some straw, perchance, on the floor on which he may lie, or which he
may burn in the fireplace to keep him alive. Perhaps this hut has never been
required to shelter a ship-wrecked man, and the benevolent person who promised
to inspect it annually, to see that the straw and matches are here, and that
the boards will keep off the wind, has grown remiss and thinks that storms and
shipwrecks are over; and this very night a perishing crew may pry open its door
with their numbed fingers and leave half their number dead here by morning.
When I thought what must be the condition of the families which alone would
ever occupy or had occupied them, what must have been the tragedy of the winter
evenings spent by human beings around their hearths, these houses, though they
were meant for human dwellings, did not look cheerful to me. They appeared but
a stage to the grave. The gulls flew around and screamed over them; the roar of
the ocean in storms, and the lapse of its waves in calms, alone resounds
through them, all dark and empty within, year in, year out, except, perchance,
on one memorable night. Houses of entertainment for shipwrecked men! What kind
of sailors’ homes were they?</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus11"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/wreckage.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="333" alt="Wreckage under the sand-bluff" title="" /> <p class="caption">Wreckage under the sand-bluff</p> </div>
<p>“Each hut,” says the author of the “Description of the
Eastern Coast of the County of Barnstable,” “stands on piles, is
eight feet long, eight feet wide, and seven feet high; a sliding door is on the
south, a sliding shutter on the west, and a pole, rising fifteen feet above the
top of the building, on the east. Within it is supplied either with straw or
hay, and is further accommodated with a bench.” They have varied little
from this model now. There are similar huts at the Isle of Sable and Anticosti,
on the north, and how far south along the coast I know not. It is pathetic to
read the minute and faithful directions which he gives to seamen who may be
wrecked on this coast, to guide them to the nearest Charity-house, or other
shelter, for, as is said of Eastham, though there are a few houses within a
mile of the shore, yet “in a snow-storm, which rages here with excessive
fury, it would be almost impossible to discover them either by night or by
day.” You hear their imaginary guide thus marshalling, cheering,
directing the dripping, shivering, freezing troop along; “at the entrance
of this valley the sand has gathered, so that at present a little climbing is
necessary. Passing over several fences and taking heed not to enter the wood on
the right hand, at the distance of three-quarters of a mile a house is to be
found. This house stands on the south side of the road, and not far from it on
the south is Pamet River, which runs from east to west through body of salt
marsh.” To him cast ashore in Eastham, he says, “The meeting-house
is without a steeple, but it may be distinguished from the dwelling-houses near
it by its situation, which is between two small groves of locusts, one on the
south and one on the north,—that on the south being three times as long
as the other. About a mile and a quarter from the hut, west by north, appear
the top and arms of a windmill.” And so on for many pages.</p>
<p>We did not learn whether these houses had been the means of saving any lives,
though this writer says, of one erected at the head of Stout’s Creek in
Truro, that “it was built in an improper manner, having a chimney in it;
and was placed on a spot where no beach-grass grew. The strong winds blew the
sand from its foundation and the weight of the chimney brought it to the
ground; so that in January of the present year [1802] it was entirely
demolished. This event took place about six weeks before the <i>Brutus</i> was
cast away. If it had remained, it is probable that the whole of the unfortunate
crew of that ship would have been saved, as they gained the shore a few rods
only from the spot where the hut had stood.”</p>
<p>This “Charity-house,” as the wrecker called it, this
“Humane-house,” as some call it, that is, the one to which we first
came, had neither window nor sliding shutter, nor clapboards, nor paint. As we
have said, there was a rusty nail put through the staple. However, as we wished
to get an idea of a Humane house, and we hoped that we should never have a
better opportunity, we put our eyes, by turns, to a knot-hole in the door, and
after long looking, without seeing, into the dark,—not knowing how many
shipwrecked men’s bones we might see at last, looking with the eye of
faith, knowing that, though to him that knocketh it may not always be opened,
yet to him that looketh long enough through a knot-hole the inside shall be
visible,—for we had had some practice at looking inward,—by
steadily keeping our other ball covered from the light meanwhile, putting the
outward world behind us, ocean and land, and the beach,—till the pupil
became enlarged and collected the rays of light that were wandering in that
dark (for the pupil shall be enlarged by looking; there never was so dark a
night but a faithful and patient eye, however small, might at last prevail over
it),—after all this, I say, things began to take shape to our
vision,—if we may use this expression where there was nothing but
emptiness,—and we obtained the long-wished-for insight. Though we thought
at first that it was a hopeless case, after several minutes’ steady
exercise of the divine faculty, our prospects began decidedly to brighten, and
we were ready to exclaim with the blind bard of “Paradise Lost and
Regained,”—</p>
<p class="poem">
“Hail, holy Light! offspring of Heaven first born,<br/>
Or of the Eternal co-eternal beam.<br/>
May I express thee unblamed?”</p>
<p>A little longer, and a chimney rushed red on our sight. In short, when our
vision had grown familiar with the darkness, we discovered that there were some
stones and some loose wads of wool on the floor, and an empty fireplace at the
further end; but it <i>was not</i> supplied with matches, or straw, or hay,
that we could see, nor “accommodated with a bench.” Indeed, it was
the wreck of all cosmical beauty there within.</p>
<p>Turning our backs on the outward world, we thus looked through the knot-hole
into the Humane house, into the very bowels of mercy; and for bread we found a
stone. It was literally a great cry (of sea-mews outside), and a little wool.
However, we were glad to sit outside, under the lee of the Humane house, to
escape the piercing wind; and there we thought how cold is charity! how
inhumane humanity! This, then, is what charity hides! Virtues antique and far
away with ever a rusty nail over the latch; and very difficult to keep in
repair, withal, it is so uncertain whether any will ever gain the beach near
you. So we shivered round about, not being able to get into it, ever and anon
looking through the knot-hole into that night without a star, until we
concluded that it was not a <i>humane</i> house at all, but a sea-side box, now
shut up. belonging to some of the family of Night or Chaos, where they spent
their summers by the sea, for the sake of the sea breeze, and that it was not
proper for us to be prying into their concerns.</p>
<p>My companion had declared before this that I had not a particle of sentiment,
in rather absolute terms, to my astonishment; but I suspect he meant that my
legs did not ache just then, though I am not wholly a stranger to that
sentiment. But I did not intend this for a sentimental journey.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus12"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/herringriver.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="355" alt="Herring River at Wellfleet" title="" /> <p class="caption">Herring River at Wellfleet</p> </div>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-4" id="linknote-4"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-4">[1]</SPAN>
We have no word in English to express the sound of many waves, dashing at
once, whether gently or violently,
πολυφλοίσβοιος
to the ear, and, in the ocean’s gentle moods, an
ἀνάριθμον
γέλασμα to the eye.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap05"></SPAN>V<br/> THE WELLFLEET OYSTERMAN</h2>
<p>Having walked about eight miles since we struck the beach, and passed the
boundary between Wellfleet and Truro, a stone post in the sand,—for even
this sand comes under the jurisdiction of one town or another,—we turned
inland over barren hills and valleys, whither the sea, for some reason, did not
follow us, and, tracing up a Hollow, discovered two or three sober-looking
houses within half a mile, uncommonly near the eastern coast. Their garrets
were apparently so full of chambers, that their roofs could hardly lie down
straight, and we did not doubt that there was room for us there. Houses near
the sea are generally low and broad. These were a story and a half high; but if
you merely counted the windows in their gable-ends, you would think that there
were many stories more, or, at any rate, that the half-story was the only one
thought worthy of being illustrated. The great number of windows in the ends of
the houses, and their irregularity in size and position, here and elsewhere on
the Cape, struck us agreeably,—as if each of the various occupants who
had their <i>cunabula</i> behind had punched a hole where his necessities
required it, and, according to his size and stature, without regard to outside
effect. There were windows for the grown folks, and windows for the
children,—three or four apiece; as a certain man had a large hole cut in
his barn-door for the cat, and another smaller one for the kitten. Sometimes
they were so low under the eaves that I thought they must have perforated the
plate beam for another apartment, and I noticed some which were triangular, to
fit that part more exactly. The ends of the houses had thus as many muzzles as
a revolver, and, if the inhabitants have the same habit of staring out the
windows that some of our neighbors have, a traveller must stand a small chance
with them.</p>
<p>Generally, the old-fashioned and unpainted houses on the Cape looked more
comfortable, as well as picturesque, than the modern and more pretending ones,
which were less in harmony with the scenery, and less firmly planted.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus13"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/gables.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="336" alt="A characteristic gable with many windows" title="" /> <p class="caption">A characteristic gable with many windows</p> </div>
<p>These houses were on the shores of a chain of ponds, seven in number, the
source of a small stream called Herring River, which empties into the Bay.
There are many Herring Rivers on the Cape; they will, perhaps, be more numerous
than herrings soon. We knocked at the door of the first house, but its
inhabitants were all gone away. In the meanwhile, we saw the occupants of the
next one looking out the window at us, and before we reached it an old woman
came out and fastened the door of her bulkhead, and went in again.
Nevertheless, we did not hesitate to knock at her door, when a grizzly-looking
man appeared, whom we took to be sixty or seventy years old. He asked us, at
first, suspiciously, where we were from, and what our business was; to which we
returned plain answers.</p>
<p>“How far is Concord from Boston?” he inquired.</p>
<p>“Twenty miles by railroad.”</p>
<p>“Twenty miles by railroad,” he repeated.</p>
<p>“Didn’t you ever hear of Concord of Revolutionary fame?”</p>
<p>“Didn’t I ever hear of Concord? Why, I heard the guns fire at the
battle of Bunker Hill. [They hear the sound of heavy cannon across the Bay.] I
am almost ninety; I am eighty-eight year old. I was fourteen year old at the
time of Concord Fight,—and where were you then?”</p>
<p>We were obliged to confess that we were not in the fight.</p>
<p>“Well, walk in, we’ll leave it to the women,” said he.</p>
<p>So we walked in, surprised, and sat down, an old woman taking our hats and
bundles, and the old man continued, drawing up to the large, old-fashioned
fireplace,—</p>
<p>“I am a poor good-for-nothing crittur, as Isaiah says; I am all broken
down this year. I am under petticoat government here.”</p>
<p>The family consisted of the old man, his wife, and his daughter, who appeared
nearly as old as her mother, a fool, her son (a brutish-looking, middle-aged
man, with a prominent lower face, who was standing by the hearth when we
entered, but immediately went out), and a little boy of ten.</p>
<p>While my companion talked with the women, I talked with the old man. They said
that he was old and foolish, but he was evidently too knowing for them.</p>
<p>“These women,” said he to me, “are both of them poor
good-for-nothing critturs. This one is my wife. I married her sixty-four years
ago. She is eighty-four years old, and as deaf as an adder, and the other is
not much better.”</p>
<p>He thought well of the Bible, or at least he <i>spoke</i> well, and did not
<i>think</i> ill, of it, for that would not have been prudent for a man of his
age. He said that he had read it attentively for many years, and he had much of
it at his tongue’s end. He seemed deeply impressed with a sense of his
own nothingness, and would repeatedly exclaim,—</p>
<p>“I am a nothing. What I gather from my Bible is just this: that man is a
poor good-for-nothing crittur, and everything is just as God sees fit and
disposes.”</p>
<p>“May I ask your name?” I said.</p>
<p>“Yes,” he answered, “I am not ashamed to tell my name. My
name is——. My great-grandfather came over from England and settled
here.”</p>
<p>He was an old Wellfleet oysterman, who had acquired a competency in that
business, and had sons still engaged in it.</p>
<p>Nearly all the oyster shops and stands in Massachusetts, I am told, are
supplied and kept by natives of Wellfleet, and a part of this town is still
called Billingsgate from the oysters having been formerly planted there; but
the native oysters are said to have died in 1770. Various causes are assigned
for this, such as a ground frost, the carcasses of blackfish kept to rot in the
harbor, and the like, but the most common account of the matter is,—and I
find that a similar superstition with regard to the disappearance of fishes
exists almost everywhere,—that when Wellfleet began to quarrel with the
neighboring towns about the right to gather them, yellow specks appeared in
them, and Providence caused them to disappear. A few years ago sixty thousand
bushels were annually brought from the South and planted in the harbor of
Wellfleet till they attained “the proper relish of Billingsgate”;
but now they are imported commonly full-grown, and laid down near their
markets, at Boston and elsewhere, where the water, being a mixture of salt and
fresh, suits them better. The business was said to be still good and improving.</p>
<p>The old man said that the oysters were liable to freeze in the winter, if
planted too high; but if it were not “so cold as to strain their
eyes” they were not injured. The inhabitants of New Brunswick have
noticed that “ice will not form over an oyster-bed, unless the cold is
very intense indeed, and when the bays are frozen over the oyster-beds are
easily discovered by the water above them remaining unfrozen, or as the French
residents say, <i>degèle</i>.” Our host said that they kept them
in cellars all winter.</p>
<p>“Without anything to eat or drink?” I asked.</p>
<p>“Without anything to eat or drink,” he answered.</p>
<p>“Can the oysters move?”</p>
<p>“Just as much as my shoe.”</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus14"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/oysterman.jpg" width-obs="292" height-obs="450" alt="A Welfleet oysterman" title="" /> <p class="caption">A Welfleet oysterman</p> </div>
<p>But when I caught him saying that they “bedded themselves down in the
sand, flat side up, round side down,” I told him that my shoe could not
do that, without the aid of my foot in it; at which he said that they merely
settled down as they grew; if put down in a square they would be found so; but
the clam could move quite fast. I have since been told by oystermen of Long
Island, where the oyster is still indigenous and abundant, that they are found
in large masses attached to the parent in their midst, and are so taken up with
their tongs; in which case, they say, the age of the young proves that there
could have been no motion for five or six years at least. And Buckland in his
Curiosities of Natural History (page 50) says: “An oyster who has once
taken up his position and fixed himself when quite young can never make a
change. Oysters, nevertheless, that have not fixed themselves, but remain loose
at the bottom of the sea, have the power of locomotion; they open their shells
to their fullest extent, and then suddenly contracting them, the expulsion of
the water forwards gives a motion backwards. A fisherman at Guernsey told me
that he had frequently seen oysters moving in this way.”</p>
<p>Some still entertain the question “whether the oyster was indigenous in
Massachusetts Bay,” and whether Wellfleet harbor was a “natural
habitat” of this fish; but, to say nothing of the testimony of old
oystermen, which, I think, is quite conclusive, though the native oyster may
now be extinct there, I saw that their shells, opened by the Indians, were
strewn all over the Cape. Indeed, the Cape was at first thickly settled by
Indians on account of the abundance of these and other fish. We saw many traces
of their occupancy after this, in Truro, near Great Hollow, and at High-Head,
near East Harbor River,—oysters, clams, cockles, and other shells,
mingled with ashes and the bones of deer and other quadrupeds. I picked up half
a dozen arrow-heads, and in an hour or two could have filled my pockets with
them. The Indians lived about the edges of the swamps, then probably in some
instances ponds, for shelter and water. Moreover, Champlain in the edition of
his “Voyages” printed in 1613, says that in the year 1606 he and
Poitrincourt explored a harbor (Barnstable Harbor?) in the southerly part of
what is now called Massachusetts Bay, in latitude 42°, about five leagues
south, one point west of <i>Cap Blanc</i> (Cape Cod), and there they found many
good oysters, and they named it “<i>le Port aux Huistres</i>”
(Oyster Harbor). In one edition of his map (1632), the <i>“R. aux
Escailles</i>” is drawn emptying into the same part of the bay, and on
the map “<i>Novi Belgii</i>,” in Ogilby’s
“America” (1670), the words “<i>Port aux Huistres</i>”
are placed against the same place. Also William Wood, who left New England in
1633, speaks, in his “New England’s Prospect,” published in
1634, of “a great oyster-bank” in Charles River, and of another in
the Mistick, each of which obstructed the navigation of its river. “The
oysters,” says he, “be great ones in form of a shoehorn; some be a
foot long; these breed on certain banks that are bare every spring tide. This
fish without the shell is so big, that it must admit of a division before you
can well get it into your mouth.” Oysters are still found there. (Also,
see Thomas Morton’s “New English Canaan,” page 90.)</p>
<p>Our host told us that the sea-clam, or hen, was not easily obtained; it was
raked up, but never on the Atlantic side, only cast ashore there in small
quantities in storms. The fisherman sometimes wades in water several feet deep,
and thrusts a pointed stick into the sand before him. When this enters between
the valves of a clam, he closes them on it, and is drawn out. It has been known
to catch and hold coot and teal which were preying on it. I chanced to be on
the bank of the Acushnet at New Bedford one day since this, watching some
ducks, when a man informed me that, having let out his young ducks to seek
their food amid the samphire (<i>Salicornia</i>) and other weeds along the
river-side at low tide that morning, at length he noticed that one remained
stationary, amid the weeds, something preventing it from following the others,
and going to it he found its foot tightly shut in a quahog’s shell. He
took up both together, carried them to his home, and his wife opening the shell
with a knife released the duck and cooked the quahog. The old man said that the
great clams were good to eat, but that they always took out a certain part
which was poisonous, before they cooked them. “People said it would kill
a cat.” I did not tell him that I had eaten a large one entire that
afternoon, but began to think that I was tougher than a cat. He stated that
pedlers came round there, and sometimes tried to sell the women folks a
skimmer, but he told them that their women had got a better skimmer than
<i>they</i> could make, in the shell of their clams; it was shaped just right
for this purpose.—They call them “skim-alls” in some places.
He also said that the sun-squall was poisonous to handle, and when the sailors
came across it, they did not meddle with it, but heaved it out of their way. I
told him that I had handled it that afternoon, and had felt no ill effects as
yet. But he said it made the hands itch, especially if they had previously been
scratched, or if I put it into my bosom I should find out what it was.</p>
<p>He informed us that no ice ever formed on the back side of the Cape, or not
more than once in a century, and but little snow lay there, it being either
absorbed or blown or washed away. Sometimes in winter, when the tide was down,
the beach was frozen, and afforded a hard road up the back side for some thirty
miles, as smooth as a floor. One winter when he was a boy, he and his father
“took right out into the back side before daylight, and walked to
Provincetown and back to dinner.”</p>
<p>When I asked what they did with all that barren-looking land, where I saw so
few cultivated fields,—“Nothing,” he said.</p>
<p>“Then why fence your fields?”</p>
<p>“To keep the sand from blowing and covering up the whole.”</p>
<p>“The yellow sand,” said he, “has some life in it, but the
white little or none.”</p>
<p>When, in answer to his questions, I told him that I was a surveyor, he said
that they who surveyed his farm were accustomed, where the ground was uneven,
to loop up each chain as high as their elbows; that was the allowance they
made, and he wished to know if I could tell him why they did not come out
according to his deed, or twice alike. He seemed to have more respect for
surveyors of the old school, which I did not wonder at. “King George the
Third,” said he, “laid out a road four rods wide and straight the
whole length of the Cape,” but where it was now he could not tell.</p>
<p>This story of the surveyors reminded me of a Long-Islander, who once, when I
had made ready to jump from the bow of his boat to the shore, and he thought
that I underrated the distance and would fall short,—though I found
afterward that he judged of the elasticity of my joints by his own,—told
me that when he came to a brook which he wanted to get over, he held up one
leg, and then, if his foot appeared to cover any part of the opposite bank, he
knew that he could jump it. “Why,” I told him, “to say
nothing of the Mississippi, and other small watery streams, I could blot out a
star with my foot, but I would not engage to jump that distance,” and
asked how he knew when he had got his leg at the right elevation. But he
regarded his legs as no less accurate than a pair of screw dividers or an
ordinary quadrant, and appeared to have a painful recollection of every degree
and minute in the arc which they described; and he would have had me believe
that there was a kind of hitch in his hip-joint which answered the purpose. I
suggested that he should connect his two ankles by a string of the proper
length, which should be the chord of an arc, measuring his jumping ability on
horizontal surfaces,—assuming one leg to be a perpendicular to the plane
of the horizon, which, however, may have been too bold an assumption in this
case. Nevertheless, this was a kind of geometry in the legs which it interested
me to hear of.</p>
<p>Our host took pleasure in telling us the names of the ponds, most of which we
could see from his windows, and making us repeat them after him, to see if we
had got them right. They were Gull Pond, the largest and a very handsome one,
clear and deep, and more than a mile in circumference, Newcomb’s,
Swett’s, Slough, Horse-Leech, Round, and Herring Ponds, all connected at
high water, if I do not mistake. The coast-surveyors had come to him for their
names, and he told them of one which they had not detected. He said that they
were not so high as formerly. There was an earthquake about four years before
he was born, which cracked the pans of the ponds, which were of iron, and
caused them to settle. I did not remember to have read of this. Innumerable
gulls used to resort to them; but the large gulls were now very scarce, for, as
he said, the English robbed their nests far in the north, where they breed. He
remembered well when gulls were taken in the gull-house, and when small birds
were killed by means of a frying-pan and fire at night. His father once lost a
valuable horse from this cause. A party from Wellfleet having lighted their
fire for this purpose, one dark night, on Billingsgate Island, twenty horses
which were pastured there, and this colt among them, being frightened by it,
and endeavoring in the dark to cross the passage which separated them from the
neighboring beach, and which was then fordable at low tide, were all swept out
to sea and drowned. I ob-served that many horses were still turned out to
pasture all summer on the islands and beaches in Wellfleet, Eastham, and
Orleans, as a kind of common. He also described the killing of what he called
“wild hens” here, after they had gone to roost in the woods, when
he was a boy. Perhaps they were “Prairie hens” (pinnated grouse).</p>
<p>He liked the Beach-pea (<i>Lathyrus maritimus</i>), cooked green, as well as
the cultivated. He had seen it growing very abundantly in Newfoundland, where
also the inhabitants ate them, but he had never been able to obtain any ripe
for seed. We read, under the head of Chatham, that “in 1555, during a
time of great scarcity, the people about Orford, in Sussex (England) were
preserved from perishing by eating the seeds of this plant, which grew there in
great abundance on the sea-coast. Cows, horses, sheep, and goats eat it.”
But the writer who quoted this could not learn that they had ever been used in
Barnstable County.</p>
<p>He had been a voyager, then? O, he had been about the world in his day. He once
considered himself a pilot for all our coast; but now they had changed the
names so he might be bothered.</p>
<p>He gave us to taste what he called the Summer Sweeting, a pleasant apple which
he raised, and frequently grafted from, but had never seen growing elsewhere,
except once,—three trees on Newfoundland, or at the Bay of Chaleur, I
forget which, as he was sailing by. He was sure that he could tell the tree at
a distance.</p>
<p>At length the fool, whom my companion called the wizard, came in, muttering
between his teeth, “Damn book-pedlers,—all the time talking about
books. Better do something. Damn ’em. I’ll shoot ’em. Got a
doctor down here. Damn him, I’ll get a gun and shoot him”; never
once holding up his head. Whereat the old man stood up and said in a loud
voice, as if he was accustomed to command, and this was not the first time he
had been obliged to exert his authority there: “John, go sit down, mind
your business,—we’ve heard you talk before,—precious little
you’ll do,—your bark is worse than your bite.” But, without
minding, John muttered the same gibberish over again, and then sat down at the
table which the old folks had left. He ate all there was on it, and then turned
to the apples, which his aged mother was paring, that she might give her guests
some apple-sauce for breakfast, but she drew them away and sent him off.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus15"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/welfleet.jpg" width-obs="313" height-obs="450" alt="Welfleet" title="" /> <p class="caption">Welfleet</p> </div>
<p>When I approached this house the next summer, over the desolate hills between
it and the shore, which are worthy to have been the birthplace of Ossian, I saw
the wizard in the midst of a cornfield on the hillside, but, as usual, he
loomed so strangely, that I mistook him for a scarecrow.</p>
<p>This was the merriest old man that we had ever seen, and one of the best
preserved. His style of conversation was coarse and plain enough to have suited
Rabelais. He would have made a good Panurge. Or rather he was a sober Silenus,
and we were the boys Chromis and Mnasilus, who listened to his story.</p>
<p class="poem">
“Not by Hæmonian hills the Thracian bard.<br/>
Nor awful Phœbus was on Pindus heard<br/>
With deeper silence or with more regard.”</p>
<p>There was a strange mingling of past and present in his conversation, for he
had lived under King George, and might have remembered when Napoleon and the
moderns generally were born. He said that one day, when the troubles between
the Colonies and the mother country first broke out, as he, a boy of fifteen,
was pitching hay out of a cart, one Doane, an old Tory, who was talking with
his father, a good Whig, said to him, “Why, Uncle Bill, you might as well
undertake to pitch that pond into the ocean with a pitchfork, as for the
Colonies to undertake to gain their independence.” He remembered well
General Washington, and how he rode his horse along the streets of Boston, and
he stood up to show us how he looked.</p>
<p>“He was a r—a—ther large and portly-looking man, a manly and
resolute-looking officer, with a pretty good leg as he sat on his
horse.”—“There, I’ll tell you, this was the way with
Washington.” Then he jumped up again, and bowed gracefully to right and
left, making show as if he were waving his hat. Said he, <i>“That</i> was
Washington.”</p>
<p>He told us many anecdotes of the Revolution, and was much pleased when we told
him that we had read the same in history, and that his account agreed with the
written.</p>
<p>“O,” he said, “I know, I know! I was a young fellow of
sixteen, with my ears wide open; and a fellow of that age, you know, is pretty
wide awake, and likes to know everything that’s going on. O, I
know!”</p>
<p>He told us the story of the wreck of the <i>Franklin</i>, which took place
there the previous spring: how a boy came to his house early in the morning to
know whose boat that was by the shore, for there was a vessel in distress, and
he, being an old man, first ate his breakfast, and then walked over to the top
of the hill by the shore, and sat down there, having found a comfortable seat,
to see the ship wrecked. She was on the bar, only a quarter of a mile from him,
and still nearer to the men on the beach, who had got a boat ready, but could
render no assistance on account of the breakers, for there was a pretty high
sea running. There were the passengers all crowded together in the forward part
of the ship, and some were getting out of the cabin windows and were drawn on
deck by the others.</p>
<p>“I saw the captain get out his boat,” said he; “he had one
little one; and then they jumped into it one after another, down as straight as
an arrow. I counted them. There were nine. One was a woman, and she jumped as
straight as any of them. Then they shoved off. The sea took them back, one wave
went over them, and when they came up there were six still clinging to the
boat; I counted them. The next wave turned the boat bottom upward, and emptied
them all out. None of them ever came ashore alive. There were the rest of them
all crowded together on the forecastle, the other parts of the ship being under
water. They had seen all that happened to the boat. At length a heavy sea
separated the forecastle from the rest of the wreck, and set it inside of the
worst breaker, and the boat was able to reach them, and it saved all that were
left, but one woman.”</p>
<p>He also told us of the steamer <i>Cambria’s</i> getting aground on his
shore a few months before we were there, and of her English passengers who
roamed over his grounds, and who, he said, thought the prospect from the high
hill by the shore “the most delightsome they had ever seen,” and
also of the pranks which the ladies played with his scoop-net in the ponds. He
spoke of these travellers with their purses full of guineas, just as our
provincial fathers used to speak of British bloods in the time of King George
the Third.</p>
<p><i>Quid loquar?</i> Why repeat what he told us?</p>
<p class="poem">
“Aut Scyllam Nisi, quam fama secuta est,<br/>
Candida succinctam latrantibus inguina monstris,<br/>
Dulichias vexâsse rates, et gurgite in alto<br/>
Ah timidos nautas canibus lacerâsse marinis?”</p>
<p>In the course of the evening I began to feel the potency of the clam which I
had eaten, and I was obliged to confess to our host that I was no tougher than
the cat he told of; but he answered, that he was a plain-spoken man, and he
could tell me that it was all imagination. At any rate, it proved an emetic in
my case, and I was made quite sick by it for a short time, while he laughed at
my expense. I was pleased to read afterward, in Mourt’s Relation of the
landing of the Pilgrims in Provincetown Harbor, these words: “We found
great muscles (the old editor says that they were undoubtedly sea-clams) and
very fat and full of sea-pearl; but we could not eat them, for they made us all
sick that did eat, as well sailors as passengers, ... but they were soon well
again.” It brought me nearer to the Pilgrims to be thus reminded by a
similar experience that I was so like them. Moreover, it was a valuable
confirmation of their story, and I am prepared now to believe every word of
Mourt’s Relation. I was also pleased to find that man and the clam lay
still at the same angle to one another. But I did not notice sea-pearl. Like
Cleopatra, I must have swallowed it. I have since dug these clams on a flat in
the Bay and observed them. They could squirt full ten feet before the wind, as
appeared by the marks of the drops on the sand.</p>
<p>“Now I’m going to ask you a question,” said the old man,
“and I don’t know as you can tell me; but you are a learned man,
and I never had any learning, only what I got by natur.”—It was in
vain that we reminded him that he could quote Josephus to our
confusion.—“I’ve thought, if I ever met a learned man I
should like to ask him this question. Can you tell me how <i>Axy</i> is spelt,
and what it means? <i>Axy</i>,” says he; “there’s a girl over
here is named <i>Axy</i>. Now what is it? What does it mean? Is it Scripture?
I’ve read my Bible twenty-five years over and over, and I never came
across it.”</p>
<p>“Did you read it twenty-five years for this object.’” I
asked.</p>
<p>“Well, <i>how</i> is it spelt? Wife, how is it spelt?” She said:
“It is in the Bible; I’ve seen it.”</p>
<p>“Well, how do you spell it?”</p>
<p>“I don’t know. A c h, ach, s e h, seh,—Achseh.”</p>
<p>“Does that spell Axy? Well, do <i>you</i> know what it means?”
asked he, turning to me.</p>
<p>“No,” I replied, “I never heard the sound before.”</p>
<p>“There was a schoolmaster down here once, and they asked him what it
meant, and he said it had no more meaning than a bean-pole.”</p>
<p>I told him that I held the same opinion with the schoolmaster. I had been a
schoolmaster myself, and had had strange names to deal with. I also heard of
such names as Zoleth, Beriah, Amaziah, Bethuel, and Shearjashub, hereabouts.</p>
<p>At length the little boy, who had a seat quite in the chimney-corner, took off
his stockings and shoes, warmed his feet, and having had his sore leg freshly
salved, went off to bed; then the fool made bare his knotty-looking feet and
legs, and followed him; and finally the old man exposed his calves also to our
gaze. We had never had the good fortune to see an old man’s legs before,
and were surprised to find them fair and plump as an infant’s, and we
thought that he took a pride in exhibiting them. He then proceeded to make
preparations for retiring, discoursing meanwhile with Panurgic plainness of
speech on the ills to which old humanity is subject. We were a rare haul for
him. He could commonly get none but ministers to talk to, though sometimes ten
of them at once, and he was glad to meet some of the laity at leisure. The
evening was not long enough for him. As I had been sick, the old lady asked if
I would not go to bed,—it was getting late for old people; but the old
man, who had not yet done his stories, said, “You ain’t particular,
are you?”</p>
<p>“O, no,” said I, “I am in no hurry. I believe I have
weathered the Clam cape.”</p>
<p>“They are good,” said he; “I wish I had some of them
now.”</p>
<p>“They never hurt me,” said the old lady.</p>
<p>“But then you took out the part that killed a cat,” said I.</p>
<p>At last we cut him short in the midst of his stories, which he promised to
resume in the morning. Yet, after all, one of the old ladies who came into our
room in the night to fasten the fire-board, which rattled, as she went out took
the precaution to fasten us in. Old women are by nature more suspicious than
old men. However, the winds howled around the house, and made the fire-boards
as well as the casements rattle well that night. It was probably a windy night
for any locality, but we could not distinguish the roar which was proper to the
ocean from that which was due to the wind alone.</p>
<p>The sounds which the ocean makes must be very significant and interesting to
those who live near it. When I was leaving the shore at this place the next
summer, and had got a quarter of a mile distant, ascending a hill, I was
startled by a sudden, loud sound from the sea, as if a large steamer were
letting off steam by the shore, so that I caught my breath and felt my blood
run cold for an instant, and I turned about, expecting to see one of the
Atlantic steamers thus far out of her course, but there was nothing unusual to
be seen. There was a low bank at the entrance of the Hollow, between me and the
ocean, and suspecting that I might have risen into another stratum of air in
ascending the hill,—which had wafted to me only the ordinary roar of the
sea,—I immediately descended again, to see if I lost <i>hearing</i> of
it; but, without regard to my ascending or descending, it died away in a minute
or two, and yet there was scarcely any wind all the while. The old man said
that this was what they called the “rut,” a peculiar roar of the
sea before the wind changes, which, however, he could not account for. He
thought that he could tell all about the weather from the sounds which the sea
made.</p>
<p>Old Josselyn, who came to New England in 1638, has it among his weather-signs,
that “the resounding of the sea from the shore, and murmuring of the
winds in the woods, without apparent wind, sheweth wind to follow.”</p>
<p>Being on another part of the coast one night since this, I heard the roar of
the surf a mile distant, and the inhabitants said it was a sign that the wind
would work round east, and we should have rainy weather. The ocean was heaped
up somewhere at the eastward, and this roar was occasioned by its effort to
preserve its equilibrium, the wave reaching the shore before the wind. Also the
captain of a packet between this country and England told me that he sometimes
met with a wave on the Atlantic coming against the wind, perhaps in a calm sea,
which indicated that at a distance the wind was blowing from an opposite
quarter, but the undulation had travelled faster than it. Sailors tell of
“tide-rips” and “ground-swells,” which they suppose to
have been occasioned by hurricanes and earthquakes, and to have travelled many
hundred, and sometimes even two or three thousand miles.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus16"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/hunting.jpg" width-obs="297" height-obs="450" alt="Hunting for a Leak" title="" /> <p class="caption">Hunting for a Leak</p> </div>
<p>Before sunrise the next morning they let us out again, and I ran over to the
beach to see the sun come out of the ocean. The old woman of eighty-four
winters was already out in the cold morning wind, bareheaded, tripping about
like a young girl, and driving up the cow to milk. She got the breakfast with
despatch, and without noise or bustle; and meanwhile the old man resumed his
stories, standing before us, who were sitting, with his back to the chimney,
and ejecting his tobacco juice right and left into the fire behind him, without
regard to the various dishes which were there preparing. At breakfast we had
eels, buttermilk cake, cold bread, green beans, doughnuts, and tea. The old man
talked a steady stream; and when his wife told him he had better eat his
breakfast, he said: “Don’t hurry me; I have lived too long to be
hurried.” I ate of the apple-sauce and the doughnuts, which I thought had
sustained the least detriment from the old man’s shots, but my companion
refused the apple-sauce, and ate of the hot cake and green beans, which had
appeared to him to occupy the safest part of the hearth. But on comparing notes
afterward, I told him that the buttermilk cake was particularly exposed, and I
saw how it suffered repeatedly, and therefore I avoided it; but he declared
that, however that might be, he witnessed that the apple-sauce was seriously
injured, and had therefore declined that. After breakfast we looked at his
clock, which was out of order, and oiled it with some “hen’s
grease,” for want of sweet oil, for he scarcely could believe that we
were not tinkers or pedlers; meanwhile he told a story about visions, which had
reference to a crack in the clock-case made by frost one night. He was curious
to know to what religious sect we belonged. He said that he had been to hear
thirteen kinds of preaching in one month, when he was young, but he did not
join any of them,—he stuck to his Bible. There was nothing like any of
them in his Bible. While I was shaving in the next room, I heard him ask my
companion to what sect he belonged, to which he answered:—</p>
<p>“O, I belong to the Universal Brotherhood.”</p>
<p>“What’s that?” he asked, “Sons o’
Temperance?”</p>
<p>Finally, filling our pockets with doughnuts, which he was pleased to find that
we called by the same name that he did, and paying for our entertainment, we
took our departure; but he followed us out of doors, and made us tell him the
names of the vegetables which he had raised from seeds that came out of the
<i>Franklin</i>. They were cabbage, broccoli, and parsley. As I had asked him
the names of so many things, he tried me in turn with all the plants which grew
in his garden, both wild and cultivated. It was about half an acre, which he
cultivated wholly himself. Besides the common garden vegetables, there were
Yellow-Dock, Lemon Balm, Hyssop, Gill-go-over-the-ground. Mouse-ear,
Chick-weed, Roman Wormwood, Elecampane, and other plants. As we stood there, I
saw a fish-hawk stoop to pick a fish out of his pond.</p>
<p>“There,” said I, “he has got a fish.”</p>
<p>“Well,” said the old man, who was looking all the while, but could
see nothing, “he didn’t dive, he just wet his claws.”</p>
<p>And, sure enough, he did not this time, though it is said that they often do,
but he merely stooped low enough to pick him out with his talons; but as he
bore his shining prey over the bushes, it fell to the ground, and we did not
see that he recovered it. That is not their practice.</p>
<p>Thus, having had another crack with the old man, he standing bareheaded under
the eaves, he directed us “athwart the fields,” and we took to the
beach again for another day, it being now late in the morning.</p>
<p>It was but a day or two after this that the safe of the Provincetown Bank was
broken open and robbed by two men from the interior, and we learned that our
hospitable entertainers did at least transiently harbor the suspicion that we
were the men.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap06"></SPAN>VI<br/> THE BEACH AGAIN</h2>
<p>Our way to the high sand-bank, which I have described as extending all along
the coast, led, as usual, through patches of Bayberry bushes which straggled
into the sand. This, next to the Shrub-oak, was perhaps the most common shrub
thereabouts. I was much attracted by its odoriferous leaves and small gray
berries which are clustered about the short twigs, just below the last
year’s growth. I know of but two bushes in Concord, and they, being
staminate plants, do not bear fruit. The berries gave it a venerable
appearance, and they smelled quite spicy, like small confectionery. Robert
Beverley, in his “History of Virginia,” published in 1705, states
that “at the mouth of their rivers, and all along upon the sea and bay,
and near many of their creeks and swamps, grows the myrtle, bearing a berry, of
which they make a hard brittle wax, of a curious green color, which by refining
becomes almost transparent. Of this they make candles, which are never greasy
to the touch nor melt with lying in the hottest weather; neither does the snuff
of these ever offend the smell, like that of a tallow candle; but, instead of
being disagreeable, if an accident puts a candle out, it yields a pleasant
fragrancy to all that are in the room; insomuch that nice people often put them
out on purpose to have the incense of the expiring snuff. The melting of these
berries is said to have been first found out by a surgeon in New England, who
performed wonderful things with a salve made of them.” From the abundance
of berries still hanging on the bushes, we judged that the inhabitants did not
generally collect them for tallow, though we had seen a piece in the house we
had just left. I have since made some tallow myself. Holding a basket beneath
the bare twigs in April, I rubbed them together between my hands and thus
gathered about a quart in twenty minutes, to which were added enough to make
three pints, and I might have gathered them much faster with a suitable rake
and a large shallow basket. They have little prominences like those of an
orange all creased in tallow, which also fills the interstices down to the
stone. The oily part rose to the top, making it look like a savory black broth,
which smelled much like balm or other herb tea. You let it cool, then skim off
the tallow from the surface, melt this again and strain it. I got about a
quarter of a pound weight from my three pints, and more yet remained within the
berries. A small portion cooled in the form of small flattish hemispheres, like
crystallizations, the size of a kernel of corn (nuggets I called them as I
picked them out from amid the berries), Loudon says, that “cultivated
trees are said to yield more wax than those that are found wild.” (See
Duplessy, <i>Végetaux Résineux</i>, Vol. II. p. 60.) If you get any pitch on
your hands in the pine-woods you have only to rub some of these berries between
your hands to start it off. But the ocean was the grand fact there, which made
us forget both bay berries and men.</p>
<p>To-day the air was beautifully clear, and the sea no longer dark and stormy,
though the waves still broke with foam along the beach, but sparkling and full
of life. Already that morning I had seen the day break over the sea as if it
came out of its bosom:—</p>
<p class="poem">
“The saffron-robed Dawn rose in haste from the streams<br/>
Of Ocean, that she might bring light to immortals and to mortals.”</p>
<p>The sun rose visibly at such a distance over the sea that the cloud-bank in the
horizon, which at first concealed him, was not perceptible until he had risen
high behind it, and plainly broke and dispersed it, like an arrow. But as yet I
looked at him as rising over land, and could not, without an effort, realize
that he was rising over the sea. Already I saw some vessels on the horizon,
which had rounded the Cape in the night, and were now well on their watery way
to other lands.</p>
<p>We struck the beach again in the south part of Truro. In the early part of the
day, while it was flood tide and the beach was narrow and soft, we walked on
the bank, which was very high here, but not so level as the day before, being
more interrupted by slight hollows. The author of the Description of the
Eastern Coast says of this part, that “the bank is very high and steep.
From the edge of it west, there is a strip of sand a hundred yards in breadth.
Then succeeds low brushwood, a quarter of a mile wide, and almost impassable.
After which comes a thick, perplexing forest, in which not a house is to be
discovered. Seamen, therefore, though the distance between these two hollows
(Newcomb’s and Brush Hollows) is great, must not attempt to enter the
wood, as in a snowstorm they must undoubtedly perish.” This is still a
true description of the country, except that there is not much high wood left.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus17"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/trurostart.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="324" alt="Truro—Starting on a voyage" title="" /> <p class="caption">Truro—Starting on a voyage</p> </div>
<p>There were many vessels, like gulls, skimming over the surface of the sea, now
half concealed in its troughs, their dolphin-strikers ploughing the water, now
tossed on the top of the billows. One, a bark standing down parallel with the
coast, suddenly furled her sails, came to anchor, and swung round in the wind,
near us, only half a mile from the shore. At first we thought that her captain
wished to communicate with us, and perhaps we did not regard the signal of
distress, which a mariner would have understood, and he cursed us for
cold-hearted wreckers who turned our backs on him. For hours we could still see
her anchored there behind us, and we wondered how she could afford to loiter so
long in her course. Or was she a smuggler who had chosen that wild beach to
land her cargo on? Or did they wish to catch fish, or paint their vessel?
Erelong other barks, and brigs, and schooners, which had in the mean while
doubled the Cape, sailed by her in the smacking breeze, and our consciences
were relieved. Some of these vessels lagged behind, while others steadily went
ahead. We narrowly watched their rig, and the cut of their jibs, and how they
walked the water, for there was all the difference between them that there is
between living creatures. But we wondered that they should be remembering
Boston and New York and Liverpool, steering for them, out there; as if the
sailor might forget his peddling business on such a grand highway. They had
perchance brought oranges from the Western Isles; and were they carrying back
the peel? We might as well transport our old traps across the ocean of
eternity. Is <i>that</i> but another “trading-flood,” with its
blessed isles? Is Heaven such a harbor as the Liverpool docks?</p>
<p>Still held on without a break, the inland barrens and shrubbery, the desert and
the high sand bank with its even slope, the broad white beach, the breakers,
the green water on the bar, and the Atlantic Ocean; and we traversed with
delight new reaches of the shore; we took another lesson in sea-horses’
manes and sea-cows’ tails, in sea-jellies and sea-clams, with our
new-gained experience. The sea ran hardly less than the day before. It seemed
with every wave to be subsiding, because such was our expectation, and yet when
hours had elapsed we could see no difference. But there it was, balancing
itself, the restless ocean by our side, lurching in its gait. Each wave left
the sand all braided or woven, as it were, with a coarse woof and warp, and a
distinct raised edge to its rapid work. We made no haste, since we wished to
see the ocean at our leisure; and indeed that soft sand was no place in which
to be in a hurry, for one mile there was as good as two elsewhere. Besides, we
were obliged frequently to empty our shoes of the sand which one took in in
climbing or descending the bank.</p>
<p>As we were walking close to the water’s edge this morning we turned
round, by chance, and saw a large black object which the waves had just cast up
on the beach behind us, yet too far off for us to distinguish what it was; and
when we were about to return to it, two men came running from the bank, where
no human beings had appeared before, as if they had come out of the sand, in
order to save it before another wave took it. As we approached, it took
successively the form of a huge fish, a drowned man, a sail or a net, and
finally of a mass of tow-cloth, part of the cargo of the <i>Franklin</i>, which
the men loaded into a cart.</p>
<p>Objects on the beach, whether men or inanimate things, look not only
exceedingly grotesque, but much larger and more wonderful than they actually
are. Lately, when approaching the seashore several degrees south of this, I saw
before me, seemingly half a mile distant, what appeared like bold and rugged
cliffs on the beach, fifteen feet high, and whitened by the sun and waves; but
after a few steps it proved to be low heaps of rags,—part of the cargo of
a wrecked vessel,—scarcely more than a foot in height. Once also it was
my business to go in search of the relics of a human body, mangled by sharks,
which had just been cast up, a week after a wreck, having got the direction
from a light-house: I should find it a mile or two distant over the sand, a
dozen rods from the water, covered with a cloth, by a stick stuck up. I
expected that I must look very narrowly to find so small an object, but the
sandy beach, half a mile wide, and stretching farther than the eye could reach,
was so perfectly smooth and bare, and the mirage toward the sea so magnifying,
that when I was half a mile distant the insignificant sliver which marked the
spot looked like a bleached spar, and the relics were as conspicuous as if they
lay in state on that sandy plain, or a generation had labored to pile up their
cairn there. Close at hand they were simply some bones with a little flesh
adhering to them, in fact, only a slight inequality in the sweep of the shore.
There was nothing at all remarkable about them, and they were singularly
inoffensive both to the senses and the imagination. But as I stood there they
grew more and more imposing. They were alone with the beach and the sea, whose
hollow roar seemed addressed to them, and I was impressed as if there was an
understanding between them and the ocean which necessarily left me out, with my
snivelling sympathies. That dead body had taken possession of the shore, and
reigned over it as no living one, could, in the name of a certain majesty which
belonged to it.</p>
<p>We afterward saw many small pieces of tow-cloth washed up, and I learn that it
continued to be found in good condition, even as late as November in that year,
half a dozen bolts at a time.</p>
<p>We eagerly filled our pockets with the smooth round pebbles which in some
places, even here, were thinly sprinkled over the sand, together with flat
circular shells (<i>Scutellæ?</i>); but, as we had read, when they were dry
they had lost their beauty, and at each sitting we emptied our pockets again of
the least remarkable, until our collection was well culled. Every material was
rolled into the pebble form by. the waves; not only stones of various kinds,
but the hard coal which some vessel had dropped, bits of glass, and in one
instance a mass of peat three feet long, where there was nothing like it to be
seen for many miles. All the great rivers of the globe are annually, if not
constantly, discharging great quantities of lumber, which drifts to distant
shores. I have also seen very perfect pebbles of brick, and bars of Castile
soap from a wreck rolled into perfect cylinders, and still spirally streaked
with red, like a barber’s pole. When a cargo of rags is washed ashore,
every old pocket and bag-like recess will be filled to bursting with sand by
being rolled on the beach; and on one occasion, the pockets in the clothing of
the wrecked being thus puffed up, even after they had been ripped open by
wreckers, deluded me into the hope of identifying them by the contents. A pair
of gloves looked exactly as if filled by a hand. The water in such clothing is
soon wrung out and evaporated, but the sand, which works itself into every
seam, is not so easily got rid of. Sponges, which are picked up on the shore,
as is well known, retain some of the sand of the beach to the latest day, in
spite of every effort to extract it.</p>
<p>I found one stone on the top of the bank, of a dark gray color, shaped exactly
like a giant clam (<i>Mactra solidissima</i>), and of the same size; and, what
was more remarkable, one-half of the outside had shelled off and lay near it,
of the same form and depth with one of the valves of this clam, while the other
half was loose, leaving a solid core of a darker color within it. I afterward
saw a stone resembling a razor clam, but it was a solid one. It appeared as if
the stone, in the process of formation, had filled the mould which a clam-shell
furnished; or the same law that shaped the clam had made a clam of stone. Dead
clams, with shells full of sand, are called sand clams. There were many of the
large clamshells filled with sand; and sometimes one valve was separately
filled exactly even, as if it had been heaped and then scraped. Even, among the
many small stones on the top of the bank, I found one arrow-head.</p>
<p>Beside the giant clam and barnacles, we found on the shore a small clam
(<i>Mesodesma arctata</i>), which I dug with my hands in numbers on the bars,
and which is sometimes eaten by the inhabitants, in the absence of the <i>Mya
arenaria</i>, on this side. Most of their empty shells had been perforated by
some foe.—Also, the</p>
<p><i>Astarte castanea</i>.</p>
<p>The Edible Mussel (<i>Mytilus edulis</i>) on the few rocks, and washed up in
curious bunches of forty or fifty, held together by its rope-like
<i>byssus</i>.</p>
<p>The Scollop Shell (<i>Pecten concentricus</i>), used for card-racks and
pin-cushions.</p>
<p>Cockles, or Cuckoos (<i>Natica heros</i>), and their remarkable <i>nidus</i>,
called “sand-circle,” looking like the top of a stone jug without
the stopple, and broken on one side, or like a flaring dickey made of
sand-paper. Also,</p>
<p><i>Cancellaria Couthouyi</i> (?), and</p>
<p>Periwinkles (?) (<i>Fusus decemcostatus</i>).</p>
<p>We afterward saw some other kinds on the Bay-side. Gould states that this Cape
“has Hitler proved a barrier to the migrations of many species of
Mollusca.”—“Of the one hundred and ninety-seven species
[which he described in 1840 as belonging to Massachusetts], eighty-three do not
pass to the South shore, and fifty are not found on the North shore of the
Cape.”</p>
<p>Among Crustacea, there were the shells of Crabs and Lobsters, often bleached
quite white high up the beach; Sea or Beach Fleas (<i>Amphipoda</i>); and the
cases of the Horse-shoe Crab, or Saucepan Fish (<i>Limulus Polyphemus</i>), of
which we saw many alive on the Bay side, where they feed pigs on them. Their
tails were used as arrow-heads by the Indians.</p>
<p>Of Radiata, there were the Sea Chestnut or Egg (<i>Echinus granulatus</i>),
commonly divested of its spines; flat circular shells (<i>Scutella parma?</i>)
covered with chocolate-colored spines, but becoming smooth and white, with five
petal-like figures; a few Star-fishes or Five-fingers (<i>Asterias rubens</i>);
and Sun-fishes or Sea-jellies (<i>Aureliæ</i>).</p>
<p>There was also at least one species of Sponge.</p>
<p>The plants which I noticed here and there on the pure sandy shelf, between the
ordinary high-water mark and the foot of the bank, were Sea Rocket (<i>Cakile
Americana</i>), Saltwort (<i>Salsola kali</i>), Sea Sandwort (<i>Honkenya
peploides</i>), Sea Burdock (<i>Xanthium echinatum</i>), Sea-side Spurge
(<i>Euphorbia poylgonifolia</i>); also, Beach Grass (<i>Arundo, Psamma</i>, or
<i>Calamagrostis arenaria</i>), Sea-side Golden-rod (<i>Solidago
sempervirens</i>), and the Beach Pea (<i>Lathyrus maritimus</i>).</p>
<p>Sometimes we helped a wrecker turn over a larger log than usual, or we amused
ourselves with rolling stones down the bank, but we rarely could make one reach
the water, the beach was so soft and wide; or we bathed in some shallow within
a bar, where the sea covered us with sand at every flux, though it was quite
cold and windy. The ocean there is commonly but a tantalizing prospect in hot
weather, for with all that water before you, there is, as we were afterward
told, no bathing on the Atlantic side, on account of the undertow and the rumor
of sharks. At the lighthouse both in Eastham and Truro, the only houses quite
on the shore, they declared, the next year, that they would not bathe there
“for any sum,” for they sometimes saw the sharks tossed up and
quiver for a moment on the sand. Others laughed at these stories, but perhaps
they could afford to because they never bathed anywhere. One old wrecker told
us that he killed a regular man-eating shark fourteen feet long, and hauled him
out with his oxen, where we had bathed; and another, that his father caught a
smaller one of the same kind that was stranded there, by standing him up on his
snout so that the waves could not take him. They will tell you tough stories of
sharks all over the Cape, which I do not presume to doubt utterly,—how
they will sometimes upset a boat, or tear it in pieces, to get at the man in
it. I can easily believe in the undertow, but I have no doubt that one shark in
a dozen years is enough to keep up the reputation of a beach a hundred miles
long. I should add, however, that in July we walked on the bank here a quarter
of a mile parallel with a fish about six feet in length, possibly a shark,
which was prowling slowly along within two rods of the shore. It was of a pale
brown color, singularly film-like and indistinct in the water, as if all nature
abetted this child of ocean, and showed many darker transverse bars or rings
whenever it came to the surface. It is well known that different fishes even of
the same species are colored by the water they inhabit. We saw it go into a
little cove or bathing-tub, where we had just been bathing, where the water was
only four or five feet deep at that time, and after exploring it go slowly out
again; but we continued to bathe there, only observing first from the bank if
the cove was preoccupied. We thought that the water was fuller of life, more
aerated perhaps than that of the Bay, like soda-water, for we were as
particular as young salmon, and the expectation of encountering a shark did not
subtract anything from its life-giving qualities.</p>
<p>Sometimes we sat on the wet beach and watched the beach birds, sand-pipers, and
others, trotting along close to each wave, and waiting for the sea to cast up
their breakfast. The former (<i>Charadrius melodus</i>) ran with great rapidity
and then stood stock still remarkably erect and hardly to be distinguished from
the beach. The wet sand was covered with small skipping Sea Fleas, which
apparently make a part of their food. These last are the little scavengers of
the beach, and are so numerous that they will devour large fishes, which have
been cast up, in a very short time. One little bird not larger than a
sparrow,—it may have been a Phalarope.—would alight on the
turbulent surface where the breakers were five or six feet high, and float
buoyantly there like a duck, cunningly taking to its wings and lifting itself a
few feet through the air over the foaming crest of each breaker, but sometimes
outriding safely a considerable billow which hid it some seconds, when its
instinct told it that it would not break. It was a little creature thus to
sport with the ocean, but it was as perfect a success in its way as the
breakers in theirs. There was also an almost uninterrupted line of coots rising
and falling with the waves, a few rods from the shore, the whole length of the
Cape. They made as constant a part of the ocean’s border as the pads or
pickerel-weed do of that of a pond. We read the following as to the Storm
Petrel (<i>Thalassidroma Wilsonii</i>), which is seen in the Bay as well as on
the outside. “The feathers on the breast of the Storm Petrel are, like
those of all swimming birds, water-proof; but substances not susceptible of
being wetted with water are, for that very reason, the best fitted for
collecting oil from its surface. That function is performed by the feathers on
the breast of the Storm Petrels as they touch on the surface; and though that
may not be the only way in which they procure their food, it is certainly that
in which they obtain great part of it. They dash along till they have loaded
their feathers and then they pause upon the wave and remove the oil with their
bills.”</p>
<p>Thus we kept on along the gently curving shore, seeing two or three miles ahead
at once,—along this ocean side-walk, where there was none to turn out
for, with the middle of the road the highway of nations on our right, and the
sand cliffs of the Cape on our left. We saw this forenoon a part of the wreck
of a vessel, probably the <i>Franklin</i>, a large piece fifteen feet square,
and still freshly painted. With a grapple and a line we could have saved it,
for the waves repeatedly washed it within cast, but they as often took it back.
It would have been a lucky haul for some poor wrecker, for I have been told
that one man who paid three or four dollars for a part of the wreck of that
vessel, sold fifty or sixty dollars’ worth of iron out of it. Another,
the same who picked up the Captain’s valise with the memorable letter in
it, showed me, growing in his garden, many pear and plum trees which washed
ashore from her, all nicely tied up and labelled, and he said that he might
have got five hundred dollars’ worth; for a Mr. Bell was importing the
nucleus of a nursery to be established near Boston. His turnip-seed came from
the same source. Also valuable spars from the same vessel and from the
<i>Cactus</i> lay in his yard. In short the inhabitants visit the beach to see
what they have caught as regularly as a fisherman his weir or a lumberer his
boom; the Cape is their boom. I heard of one who had recently picked up twenty
barrels of apples in good condition, probably a part of a deck load thrown over
in a storm.</p>
<p>Though there are wreck-masters appointed to look after valuable property which
must be advertised, yet undoubtedly a great deal of value is secretly carried
off. But are we not all wreckers contriving that some treasure may be washed up
on our beach, that we may secure it, and do we not infer the habits of these
Nauset and Barnegat wreckers from the common modes of getting a living?</p>
<p>The sea, vast and wild as it is, bears thus the waste and wrecks of human art
to its remotest shore. There is no telling what it may not vomit up. It lets
nothing lie; not even the giant clams which cling to its bottom. It is still
heaving up the tow-cloth of the <i>Franklin</i>, and perhaps a piece of some
old pirate’s ship, wrecked more than a hundred years ago, comes ashore
to-day. Some years since, when a vessel was wrecked here which had nutmegs in
her cargo, they were strewn all along the beach, and for a considerable time
were not spoiled by the salt water. Soon afterward, a fisherman caught a cod
which was full of them. Why, then, might not the Spice-Islanders shake their
nutmeg trees into the ocean, and let all nations who stand in need of them pick
them up? However, after a year, I found that the nutmegs from the
<i>Franklin</i> had become soft.</p>
<p>You might make a curious list of articles which fishes have
swallowed,—sailors’ open clasp-knives, and bright tin snuff-boxes,
not knowing what was in them,—and jugs, and jewels, and Jonah. The other
day I came across the following scrap in a newspaper.</p>
<p class="letter">
“A Religious Fish.—A short time ago, mine host Stewart, of the
Denton Hotel, purchased a rock-fish, weighing about sixty pounds. On opening it
he found in it a certificate of membership of the M. E. Church, which we read
as follows:—</p>
<p>Member<br/>
Methodist E. Church.<br/>
Founded A. D. 1784.<br/>
Quarterly Ticket.<br/>
18<br/>
Minister.<br/></p>
<p class="letter">
‘For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a
far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory.’—2 Cor. iv. 17.</p>
<p class="poem">
‘O what are all my sufferings here,<br/>
If, Lord, thou count me meet<br/>
With that enraptured host t’ appear,<br/>
And worship at thy feet!’</p>
<p>“The paper was of course in a crumpled and wet condition, but on exposing
it to the sun, and ironing the kinks out of it, it became quite
legible.—<i>Denton</i> (<i>Md.</i>) <i>Journal</i>.”</p>
<p class="p2">
From time to time we saved a wreck ourselves, a box or barrel, and set it on
its end, and appropriated it with crossed sticks; and it will lie there
perhaps, respected by brother wreckers, until some more violent storm shall
take it, really lost to man until wrecked again. We also saved, at the cost of
wet feet only, a valuable cord and buoy, part of a seine, with which the sea
was playing, for it seemed ungracious to refuse the least gift which so great a
personage offered you. We brought this home and still use it for a garden line.
I picked up a bottle half buried in the wet sand, covered with barnacles, but
stoppled tight, and half full of red ale, which still smacked of
juniper,—all that remained I fancied from the wreck of a rowdy
world,—that great salt sea on the one hand, and this little sea of ale on
the other, preserving their separate characters. What if it could tell us its
adventures over countless ocean waves! Man would not be man through such
ordeals as it had passed. But as I poured it slowly out on to the sand, it
seemed to me that man himself was like a half-emptied bottle of pale ale, which
Time had drunk so far, yet stoppled tight for a while, and drifting about in
the ocean of circumstances; but destined erelong to mingle with the surrounding
waves, or be spilled amid the sands of a distant shore.</p>
<p>In the summer I saw two men fishing for Bass hereabouts. Their bait was a
bullfrog, or several small frogs in a bunch, for want of squid. They followed a
retiring wave and whirling their lines round and round their heads with
increasing rapidity, threw them as far as they could into the sea; then
retreating, sat down, flat on the sand, and waited for a bite. It was literally
(or <i>littorally</i>) walking down to the shore, and throwing your line into
the Atlantic. I should not have known what might take hold of the other end,
whether Proteus or another. At any rate, if you could not pull him in, why, you
might let him go without being pulled in yourself. And <i>they</i> knew by
experience that it would be a Striped Bass, or perhaps a Cod, for these fishes
play along near the shore.</p>
<p>From time to time we sat under the lee of a sand-hill on the bank, thinly
covered with coarse Beach-grass, and steadily gazed on the sea, or watched the
vessels going south, all Blessings of the Bay of course. We could see a little
more than half a circle of ocean, besides the glimpses of the Bay which we got
behind us; the sea there was not wild and dreary in all respects, for there
were frequently a hundred sail in sight at once on the Atlantic. You can
commonly count about eighty in a favorable summer day and pilots sometimes land
and ascend the bank to look out for these which require their services. These
had been waiting for fair weather, and had come out of Boston Harbor together.
The same is the case when they have been assembled in the Vineyard Sound, so
that you may see but few one day, and a large fleet the next. Schooners with
many jibs and stay-sails crowded all the sea road; square-rigged vessels with
their great height and breadth of canvas were ever and anon appearing out of
the far horizon, or disappearing and sinking into it; here and there a
pilot-boat was towing its little boat astern toward some distant foreigner who
had just fired a gun, the echo of which along the shore sounded like the caving
of the bank. We could see the pilot looking through his glass toward the
distant ship which was putting back to speak with him. He sails many a mile to
meet her; and now she puts her sails aback, and communicates with him
alongside,—sends some important message to the owners, and then bids
farewell to these shores for good and all; or, perchance a propeller passed and
made fast to some disabled craft, or one that had been becalmed, whose cargo of
fruit might spoil. Though silently, and for the most part incommunicatively,
going about their business, they were, no doubt, a source of cheerfulness and a
kind of society to one another.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus18"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/unloading.jpg" width-obs="314" height-obs="450" alt="Unloading the day’s catch" title="" /> <p class="caption">Unloading the day’s catch</p> </div>
<p>To-day it was the Purple Sea, an epithet which I should not before have
accepted. There were distinct patches of the color of a purple grape with the
bloom rubbed off. But first and last the sea is of all colors. Well writes
Gilpin concerning “the brilliant hues which are continually playing on
the surface of a quiet ocean,” and this was not too turbulent at a
distance from the shore. “Beautiful,” says he, “no doubt in a
high degree are those glimmering tints which often invest the tops of
mountains; but they are mere coruscations compared with these marine colors,
which are continually varying and shifting into each other in all the vivid
splendor of the rainbow, through the space often of several leagues.”
Commonly, in calm weather, for half a mile from the shore, where the bottom
tinges it, the sea is green, or greenish, as are some ponds; then blue for many
miles, often with purple tinges, bounded in the distance by a light almost
silvery stripe; beyond which there is generally a dark-blue rim, like a
mountain-ridge in the horizon, as if, like that, it owed its color to the
intervening atmosphere. On another day it will be marked with long streaks,
alternately smooth and rippled, light-colored and dark, even like our inland
meadows in a freshet, and showing which way the wind sets.</p>
<p>Thus we sat on the foaming shore, looking on the wine-colored ocean,—</p>
<p class="letter">
Φίν’ ἔφ’ ἁλὸς
πολιῆς, ὁρόων
ἐπὶ οἴνοπα
πόντον.</p>
<p>Here and there was a darker spot on its surface, the shadow of a cloud, though
the sky was so clear that no cloud would have been noticed otherwise, and no
shadow would have been seen on the land, where a much smaller surface is
visible at once. So, distant clouds and showers may be seen on all sides by a
sailor in the course of a day, which do not necessarily portend rain where he
is. In July we saw similar dark-blue patches where schools of Menhaden rippled
the surface, scarcely to be distinguished from the shadows of clouds. Sometimes
the sea was spotted with them far and wide, such is its inexhaustible
fertility. Close at hand you see their back fin, which is very long and sharp,
projecting two or three inches above water. From time to time also we saw the
white bellies of the Bass playing along the shore.</p>
<p>It was a poetic recreation to watch those distant sails steering for
half-fabulous ports, whose very names are a mysterious music to our ears:
Fayal, and Babelmandel, ay, and Chagres, and Panama,—bound to the famous
Bay of San Francisco, and the golden streams of Sacramento and San Joaquin, to
Feather River and the American Fork, where Sutter’s Fort presides, and
inland stands the City de los Angeles. It is remarkable that men do not sail
the sea with more expectation. Nothing remarkable was ever accomplished in a
prosaic mood. The heroes and discoverers have found true more than was
previously believed, only when they were expecting and dreaming of something
more than their contemporaries dreamed of, or even themselves discovered, that
is, when they were in a frame of mind fitted to behold the truth. Referred to
the world’s standard, they are always insane. Even savages have
indirectly surmised as much. Humboldt, speaking of Columbus approaching the New
World, says: “The grateful coolness of the evening air, the ethereal
purity of the starry firmament, the balmy fragrance of flowers, wafted to him
by the land breeze, all led him to suppose (as we are told by Herrara, in the
Decades) that he was approaching the garden of Eden, the sacred abode of our
first parents. The Orinoco seemed to him one of the four rivers which,
according to the venerable tradition of the ancient world, flowed from
Paradise, to water and divide the surface of the earth, newly adorned with
plants.” So even the expeditions for the discovery of El Dorado, and of
the Fountain of Youth, led to real, if not compensatory discoveries.</p>
<p>We discerned vessels so far off, when once we began to look, that only the tops
of their masts in the horizon were visible, and it took a strong intention of
the eye, and its most favorable side, to see them at all, and sometimes we
doubted if we were not counting our eyelashes. Charles Darwin states that he
saw, from the base of the Andes, “the masts of the vessels at anchor in
the bay of Valparaiso, although not less than twenty-six geographical miles
distant,” and that Anson had been surprised at the distance at which his
vessels were discovered from the coast, without knowing the reason, namely, the
great height of the land and the transparency of the air. Steamers may be
detected much farther than sailing vessels, for, as one says, when their hulls
and masts of wood and iron are down, their smoky masts and streamers still
betray them; and the same writer, speaking of the comparative advantages of
bituminous and anthracite coal for war-steamers, states that, “from the
ascent of the columns of smoke above the horizon, the motions of the steamers
in Calais Harbor [on the coast of France] are at all times observable at
Ramsgate [on the English coast], from the first lighting of the fires to the
putting out at sea; and that in America the steamers burning the fat bituminous
coal can be tracked at sea at least seventy miles before the hulls become
visible, by the dense columns of black smoke pouring out of their chimneys, and
trailing along the horizon.”</p>
<p>Though there were numerous vessels at this great distance in the horizon on
every side, yet the vast spaces between them, like the spaces between the
stars, far as they were distant from us, so were they from one
another,—nay, some were twice as far from each other as from
us,—impressed us with a sense of the immensity of the ocean, the
“unfruitful ocean,” as it has been called, and we could see what
proportion man and his works bear to the globe. As we looked off, and saw the
water growing darker and darker and deeper and deeper the farther we looked,
till it was awful to consider, and it appeared to have no relation to the
friendly land, either as shore or bottom,—of what use is a bottom if it
is out of sight, if it is two or three miles from the surface, and you are to
be drowned so long before you get to it, though it were made of the same stuff
with your native soil?—over that ocean, where, as the Veda says,
“there is nothing to give support, nothing to rest upon, nothing to cling
to,” I felt that I was a land animal. The man in a balloon even may
commonly alight on the earth in a few moments, but the sailor’s only hope
is that he may reach the distant shore. I could then appreciate the heroism of
the old navigator. Sir Humphrey Gilbert, of whom it is related that, being
overtaken by a storm when on his return from America, in the year 1583, far
northeastward from where we were, sitting abaft with a book in his hand, just
before he was swallowed up in the deep, he cried out to his comrades in the
<i>Hind</i>, as they came within hearing, “We are as near to Heaven by
sea as by land.” I saw that it would not be easy to realize.</p>
<p>On Cape Cod, the next most eastern land you hear of is St. George’s Bank
(the fishermen tell of “Georges,” “Cashus,” and other
sunken lands which they frequent). Every Cape man has a theory about
George’s Bank having been an island once, and in their accounts they
gradually reduce the shallowness from six, five, four, two fathoms, to
somebody’s confident assertion that he has seen a mackerel-gull sitting;
on a piece of dry land there. It reminded me, when I thought of the shipwrecks
which had taken place there, of the Isle of Demons, laid down off this coast in
old charts of the New World. There must be something monstrous, methinks, in a
vision of the sea bottom from over some bank a thousand miles from the shore,
more awful than its imagined bottomlessness; a drowned continent, all livid and
frothing at the nostrils, like the body of a drowned man, which is better sunk
deep than near the surface.</p>
<p>I have been surprised to discover from a steamer the shallowness of
Massachusetts Bay itself. Off Billingsgate Point I could have touched the
bottom with a pole, and I plainly saw it variously shaded with sea-weed, at
five or six miles from the shore. This is “The Shoal-ground of the
Cape,” it is true, but elsewhere the bay is not much deeper than a
country pond. We are told that the deepest water in the English Channel between
Shakespeare’s Cliff and Cape Grinéz, in France, is one hundred and eighty
feet; and Guyot says that “the Baltic Sea has a depth of only one hundred
and twenty feet between the coasts of Germany and those of Sweden,” and
“the Adriatic between Venice and Trieste has a depth of only one hundred
and thirty feet.” A pond in my native town, only half a mile long, is
more than one hundred feet deep.</p>
<p>The ocean is but a larger lake. At midsummer you may sometimes see a strip of
glassy smoothness on it, a few rods in width and many miles long, as if the
surface there were covered with a thin pellicle of oil, just as on a country
pond; a sort of stand-still, you would say, at the meeting or parting of two
currents of air (if it does not rather mark the unrippled steadiness of a
current of water beneath), for sailors tell of the ocean and land breeze
meeting between the fore and aft sails of a vessel, while the latter are full,
the former being suddenly taken aback. Daniel Webster, in one of his letters
describing blue-fishing off Martha’s Vineyard, referring to those smooth
places, which fishermen and sailors call “slicks,” says: “We
met with them yesterday, and our boatman made for them, whenever discovered. He
said they were caused by the blue-fish chopping up their prey. That is to say,
those voracious fellows get into a school of menhaden, which are too large to
swallow whole, and they bite them into pieces to suit their tastes. And the oil
from this butchery, rising to the surface, makes the
‘slick.’”</p>
<p>Yet this same placid Ocean, as civil now as a city’s harbor, a place for
ships and commerce, will erelong be lashed into sudden fury, and all its caves
and cliffs will resound with tumult. It will ruthlessly heave these vessels to
and fro, break them in pieces in its sandy or stony jaws, and deliver their
crews to sea-monsters. It will play with them like sea-weed, distend them like
dead frogs, and carry them about, now high, now low, to show to the fishes,
giving them a nibble. This gentle Ocean will toss and tear the rag of a
man’s body like the father of mad bulls, and his relatives may be seen
seeking the remnants for weeks along the strand. From some quiet inland hamlet
they have rushed weeping to the unheard-of shore, and now stand uncertain where
a sailor has recently been buried amid the sandhills.</p>
<p>It is generally supposed that they who have long been conversant with the Ocean
can foretell by certain indications, such as its roar and the notes of
sea-fowl, when it will change from calm to storm; but probably no such ancient
mariner as we dream of exists; they know no more, at least, than the older
sailors do about this voyage of life on which we are all embarked.
Nevertheless, we love to hear the sayings of old sailors, and their accounts of
natural phenomena, which totally ignore, and are ignored by, science; and
possibly they have not always looked over the gunwale so long in vain. Kalm
repeats a story which was told him in Philadelphia by a Mr. Cock, who was one
day sailing to the West Indies in a small yacht, with an old man on board who
was well acquainted with those seas. “The old man sounding the depth,
called to the mate to tell Mr. Cock to launch the boats immediately, and to put
a sufficient number of men into them, in order to tow the yacht during the
calm, that they might reach the island before them as soon as possible, as
within twenty-four hours there would be a strong hurricane. Mr. Cock asked him
what reasons he had to think so; the old man replied that, on sounding, he saw
the lead in the water at a distance of many fathoms more than he had seen it
before; that therefore the water was become clear all of a sudden, which he
looked upon as a certain sign of an impending hurricane in the sea.” The
sequel of the story is that, by good fortune and by dint of rowing they managed
to gain a safe harbor before the hurricane had reached its height; but it
finally raged with so much violence that not only many ships were lost and
houses unroofed, but even their own vessel in harbor was washed so far on shore
that several weeks elapsed before it could be got off.</p>
<p>The Greeks would not have called the ocean
ἀτρύγετος, or unfruitful,
though it does not produce wheat, if they had viewed it by the light of modern
science; for naturalists now assert that “the sea, and not the land, is
the principal seat of life,”—though not of vegetable life. Darwin
affirms that “our most thickly inhabited forests appear almost as deserts
when we come to compare them with the corresponding regions of the
ocean.” Agassiz and Gould tell us that “the sea teems with animals
of all classes, far beyond the extreme point of flowering plants”; but
they add that “experiments of dredging in very deep water have also
taught us that the abyss of the ocean is nearly a
desert”;—“so that modern investigations,” to quote the
words of Desor, “merely go to confirm the great idea which was vaguely
anticipated by the ancient poets and philosophers, that the Ocean is the origin
of all things.” Yet marine animals and plants hold a lower rank in the
scale of being than land animals and plants. “There is no instance
known,” says Desor, “of an animal becoming aquatic in its perfect
state, after having lived in its lower stage on dry land.” but as in the
case of the tadpole, “the progress invariably points towards the dry
land.” In short, the dry land itself came through and out of the water in
its way to the heavens, for, “in going back through the geological ages,
we come to an epoch when, according to all appearances, the dry land did not
exist, and when the surface of our globe was entirely covered with
water.” We looked on the sea, then, once more, not as
ἀτρύγετος, or unfruitful, but as
it has been more truly called, the “laboratory of continents.”</p>
<p>Though we have indulged in some placid reflections of late, the reader must not
forget that the dash and roar of the waves were incessant. Indeed, it would be
well if he were to read with a large conch-shell at his ear. But
notwithstanding that it was very cold and windy to-day, it was such a cold as
we thought would not cause one to take cold who was exposed to it, owing to the
saltness of the air and the dryness of the soil. Yet the author of the old
Description of Wellfleet says: “The atmosphere is very much impregnated
with saline particles, which, perhaps, with the great use of fish, and the
neglect of cider and spruce-beer, may be a reason why the people are more
subject to sore mouths and throats than in other places.”</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap07"></SPAN>VII<br/> ACROSS THE CAPE</h2>
<p>When we have returned from the seaside, we sometimes ask ourselves why we did
not spend more time in gazing at the sea; but very soon the traveller does not
look as the sea more than at the heavens. As for the interior, if the elevated
sand-bar in the midst of the ocean can be said to have any interior, it was an
exceedingly desolate landscape, with rarely a cultivated or cultivable field in
sight. We saw no villages, and seldom a house, for these are generally on the
Bay side. It was a succession of shrubby hills and valleys, now wearing an
autumnal tint. You would frequently think, from the character of the surface,
the dwarfish trees, and the bearberries around, that you were on the top of a
mountain. The only wood in Eastham was on the edge of Wellfleet. The
pitch-pines were not commonly more than fifteen or eighteen feet high. The
larger ones covered with lichens,—often hung with the long gray
<i>Usnea</i>. There is scarcely a white-pine on the forearm of the Cape. Yet in
the northwest part of Eastham, near the Camp Ground, we saw, the next summer,
some quite rural, and even sylvan retreats, for the Cape, where small rustling
groves of oaks and locusts and whispering pines, on perfectly level ground,
made a little paradise. The locusts, both transplanted and growing naturally
about the houses there, appeared to flourish better than any other tree. There
were thin belts of wood in Wellfleet and Truro, a mile or more from the
Atlantic, but, for the most part, we could see the horizon through them, or, if
extensive, the trees were not large. Both oaks and pines had often the same
flat look with the apple-trees. Commonly, the oak woods twenty-five years old
were a mere scraggy shrubbery nine or ten feet high, and we could frequently
reach to their topmost leaf. Much that is called “woods” was about
half as high as this,—only patches of shrub-oak, bayberry, beach-plum,
and wild roses, overrun with woodbine. When the roses were in bloom, these
patches in the midst of the sand displayed such a profusion of blossoms,
mingled with the aroma of the bayberry, that no Italian or other artificial
rose-garden could equal them. They were perfectly Elysian, and realized my idea
of an oasis in the desert. Huckleberry-bushes were very abundant, and the next
summer they bore a remarkable quantity of that kind of gall called
Huckleberry-apple, forming quite handsome though monstrous blossoms. But it
must be added, that this shrubbery swarmed with wood-ticks, sometimes very
troublesome parasites, and which it takes very horny fingers to crack.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus19"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/trurofoot.jpg" width-obs="304" height-obs="450" alt="A Truro footpath" title="" /> <p class="caption">A Truro footpath</p> </div>
<p>The inhabitants of these towns have a great regard for a tree, though their
standard for one is necessarily neither large nor high; and when they tell you
of the large trees that once grew here, you must think of them, not as
absolutely large, but large compared with the present generation. Their
“brave old oaks,” of which they speak with so much respect, and
which they will point out to you as relics of the primitive forest, one hundred
or one hundred and fifty, ay, for aught they know, two hundred years old, have
a ridiculously dwarfish appearance, which excites a smile in the beholder. The
largest and most venerable which they will show you in such a case are,
perhaps, not more than twenty or twenty-five feet high. I was especially amused
by the Liliputian old oaks in the south part of Truro. To the inexperienced
eye, which appreciated their proportions only, they might appear vast as the
tree which saved his royal majesty, but measured, they were dwarfed at once
almost into lichens which a deer might eat up in a morning. Yet they will tell
you that large schooners were once built of timber which grew in Wellfleet. The
old houses also are built of the timber of the Cape; but instead of the forests
in the midst of which they originally stood, barren heaths, with poverty-grass
for heather, now stretch away on every side. The modern houses are built of
what is called “dimension timber,” <i>imported</i> from Maine, all
ready to be set up, so that commonly they do not touch it again with an axe.
Almost all the wood used for fuel is imported by vessels or currents, and of
course all the coal. I was told that probably a quarter of the fuel and a
considerable part of the lumber used in North Truro was drift-wood. Many get
<i>all</i> their fuel from the beach.</p>
<p>Of birds not found in the interior of the State,—at least in my
neighborhood,—I heard, in the summer, the Black-throated Bunting
(<i>Fringilla Americana</i>) amid the shrubbery, and in the open land the
Upland Plover (<i>Totanus Bartramius</i>), whose quivering notes were ever and
anon prolonged into a clear, somewhat plaintive, yet hawk-like scream, which
sounded at a very indefinite distance. The bird may have been in the next
field, though it sounded a mile off.</p>
<p>To-day we were walking through Truro, a town of about eighteen hundred
inhabitants. We had already come to Pamet River, which empties into the Bay.
This was the limit of the Pilgrims’ journey up the Cape from
Provincetown, when seeking a place for settlement. It rises in a hollow within
a few rods of the Atlantic, and one who lives near its source told us that in
high tides the sea leaked through, yet the wind and waves preserve intact the
barrier between them, and thus the whole river is steadily driven westward
butt-end foremost,—fountain-head, channel, and light-house at the mouth,
all together.</p>
<p>Early in the afternoon we reached the Highland Light, whose white tower we had
seen rising out of the bank in front of us for the last mile or two. It is
fourteen miles from the Nauset Lights, on what is called the Clay Pounds, an
immense bed of clay abutting on the Atlantic, and, as the keeper told us,
stretching quite across the Cape, which is here only about two miles wide. We
perceived at once a difference in the soil, for there was an interruption of
the desert, and a slight appearance of a sod under our feet, such as we had not
seen for the last two days.</p>
<p>After arranging to lodge at the light-house, we rambled across the Cape to the
Bay, over a singularly bleak and barren-looking country, consisting of rounded
hills and hollows, called by geologists diluvial elevations and
depressions,—a kind of scenery which has been compared to a chopped sea,
though this suggests too sudden a transition. There is a delineation of this
very landscape in Hitchcock’s Report on the Geology of Massachusetts, a
work which, by its size at least, reminds one of a diluvial elevation itself.
Looking southward from the light-house, the Cape appeared like an elevated
plateau, sloping very regularly, though slightly, downward from the edge of the
bank on the Atlantic side, about one hundred and fifty feet above the ocean, to
that on the Bay side. On traversing this we found it to be interrupted by broad
valleys or gullies, which become the hollows in the bank when the sea has worn
up to them. They are commonly at right angles with the shore, and often extend
quite across the Cape. Some of the valleys, however, are circular, a hundred
feet deep without any outlet, as if the Cape had sunk in those places, or its
sands had run out. The few scattered houses which we passed, being placed at
the bottom of the hollows for shelter and fertility, were, for the most part,
concealed entirely, as much as if they had been swallowed up in the earth. Even
a village with its meeting-house, which we had left little more than a
stone’s throw behind, had sunk into the earth, spire and all, and we saw
only the surface of the upland and the sea on either hand. When approaching it,
we had mistaken the belfry for a summer-house on the plain. We began to think
that we might tumble into a village before we were aware of it, as into an
ant-lion’s hole, and be drawn into the sand irrecoverably. The most
conspicuous objects on the land were a distant windmill, or a meeting-house
standing alone, for only they could afford to occupy an exposed place. A great
part of the township, however, is a barren, heath-like plain, and perhaps one
third of it lies in common, though the property of individuals. The author of
the old “Description of Truro,” speaking of the soil, says:
“The snow, which would be of essential service to it provided it lay
level and covered the ground, is blown into drifts and into the sea.”
This peculiar open country, with here and there a patch of shrubbery, extends
as much as seven miles, or from Pamet River on the south to High Head on the
north, and from Ocean to Bay. To walk over it makes on a stranger such an
impression as being at sea, and he finds it impossible to estimate distances in
any weather. A windmill or a herd of cows may seem to be far away in the
horizon, yet, after going a few rods, he will be close upon them. He is also
deluded by other kinds of mirage. When, in the summer, I saw a family
a-blueberrying a mile off, walking about amid the dwarfish bushes which did not
come up higher than their ankles, they seemed to me to be a race of giants,
twenty feet high at least.</p>
<p>The highest and sandiest portion next the Atlantic was thinly covered with
Beach-grass and Indigo-weed. Next to this the surface of the upland generally
consisted of white sand and gravel, like coarse salt, through which a scanty
vegetation found its way up. It will give an ornithologist some idea of its
barrenness if I mention that the next June, the month of grass. I found a
night-hawk’s eggs there, and that almost any square rod thereabouts,
taken at random, would be an eligible site for such a deposit. The
kildeer-plover, which loves a similar locality, also drops its eggs there, and
fills the air above with its din. This upland also produced <i>Cladonia</i>
lichens, poverty-grass, savory-leaved aster (<i>Diplopappus linariifolius</i>),
mouse-ear, bear-berry, &c. On a few hillsides the savory-leaved aster and
mouse-ear alone made quite a dense sward, said to be very pretty when the aster
is in bloom. In some parts the two species of poverty-grass (<i>Hudsonia
tomentosa</i> and <i>ericoides</i>), which deserve a better name, reign for
miles in littli hemispherical tufts or islets, like moss, scattered over the
waste. They linger in bloom there till the middle of July. Occasionally near
the beach these rounded beds, as also those of the sea-sandwort (<i>Honkenya
peploides</i>), were filled with sand within an inch of their tops, and were
hard, like large ant-hills, while the surrounding sand was soft. In summer, if
the poverty-grass grows at the head of a Hollow looking toward the sea, in a
bleak position where the wind rushes up, the northern or exposed half of the
tuft is sometimes all black and dead like an oven-broom, while the opposite
half is yellow with blossoms, the whole hillside thus presenting a remarkable
contrast when seen from the poverty-stricken and the flourishing side. This
plant, which in many places would be esteemed an ornament, is here despised by
many on account of its being associated with barrenness. It might well be
adopted for the Barnstable coat-of-arms, in a field <i>sableux</i>. I should be
proud of it. Here and there were tracts of Beach-grass mingled with the
Sea-side Goldenrod and Beach-pea, which reminded us still more forcibly of the
ocean.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus20"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/truromeet.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="325" alt="Truro meeting-house on the hill" title="" /> <p class="caption">Truro meeting-house on the hill</p> </div>
<p>We read that there was not a brook in Truro. Yet there were deer here once,
which must often have panted in vain; but I am pretty sure that I afterward saw
a small fresh-water brook emptying into the south side of Pamet River, though I
was so heedless as not to taste it. At any rate, a little boy near by told me
that he drank at it. There was not a tree as far as we could see, and that was
many miles each way, the general level of the upland being about the same
everywhere. Even from the Atlantic side we overlooked the Bay, and saw to
Manomet Point in Plymouth, and better from that side because it was the
highest. The almost universal bareness and smoothness of the landscape were as
agreeable as novel, making it so much the more like the deck of a vessel. We
saw vessels sailing south into the Bay, on the one hand, and north along the
Atlantic shore, on the other, all with an aft wind.</p>
<p>The single road which runs lengthwise the Cape, now winding over the plain, now
through the shrubbery which scrapes the wheels of the stage, was a mere
cart-track in the sand, commonly without any fences to confine it, and
continually changing from this side to that, to harder ground, or sometimes to
avoid the tide. But the inhabitants travel the waste here and there
pilgrim-wise and staff in hand, by narrow footpaths, through which the sand
flows out and reveals the nakedness of the land. We shuddered at the thought of
living there and taking our afternoon walks over those barren swells, where we
could overlook every step of our walk before taking it, and would have to pray
for a fog or a snow-storm to conceal our destiny. The walker there must soon
eat his heart.</p>
<p>In the north part of the town there is no house from shore to shore for several
miles, and it is as wild and solitary as the Western Prairies—used to be.
Indeed, one who has seen every house in Truro will be surprised to hear of the
number of the inhabitants, but perhaps five hundred of the men and boys of this
small town were then abroad on their fishing grounds. Only a few men stay at
home to till the sand or watch for blackfish. The farmers are fishermen-farmers
and understand better ploughing the sea than the land. They do not disturb
their sands much, though there is a plenty of sea-weed in the creeks, to say
nothing of blackfish occasionally rotting the shore. Between the Pond and East
Harbor Village there was an interesting plantation of pitch-pines, twenty or
thirty acres in extent, like those which we had already seen from the stage.
One who lived near said that the land was purchased by two men for a shilling
or twenty-five cents an acre. Some is not considered worth writing a deed for.
This soil or sand, which was partially covered with poverty and beach grass,
sorrel, &c., was furrowed at intervals of about four feet and the seed
dropped by a machine. The pines had come up admirably and grown the first year
three or four inches, and the second six inches and more. Where the seed had
been lately planted the white sand was freshly exposed in an endless furrow
winding round and round the sides of the deep hollows, in a vertical spiral
manner, which produced a very singular effect, as if you were looking into the
reverse side of a vast banded shield. This experiment, so important to the
Cape, appeared very successful, and perhaps the time will come when the greater
part of this kind of land in Barnstable County will be thus covered with an
artificial pine forest, as has been done in some parts of France. In that
country 12,500 acres of downs had been thus covered in 1811 near Bayonne. They
are called <i>pignadas</i>, and according to Loudon “constitute the
principal riches of the inhabitants, where there was a drifting desert
before.” It seemed a nobler kind of grain to raise than corn even.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus21"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/herd.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="298" alt="A herd of cows" title="" /> <p class="caption">A herd of cows</p> </div>
<p>A few years ago Truro was remarkable among the Cape towns for the number of
sheep raised in it; but I was told that at this time only two men kept sheep in
the town, and in 1855, a Truro boy ten years old told me that he had never seen
one. They were formerly pastured on the unfenced lands or general fields, but
now the owners were more particular to assert their rights, and it cost too
much for fencing. The rails are cedar from Maine, and two rails will answer for
ordinary purposes, but four are required for sheep. This was the reason
assigned by one who had formerly kept them for not keeping them any longer.
Fencing stuff is so expensive that I saw fences made with only one rail, and
very often the rail when split was carefully tied with a string. In one of the
villages I saw the next summer a cow tethered by a rope six rods long, the rope
long in proportion as the feed was short and thin. Sixty rods, ay, all the
cables of the Cape, would have been no more than fair. Tethered in the desert
for fear that she would get into Arabia Felix! I helped a man weigh a bundle of
hay which he was selling to his neighbor, holding one end of a pole from which
it swung by a steel-yard hook, and this was just half his whole crop. In short,
the country looked so barren that I several times refrained from asking the
inhabitants for a string or a piece of wrapping-paper, for fear I should rob
them, for they plainly were obliged to import these things as well as rails,
and where there were no newsboys, I did not see what they would do for waste
paper.</p>
<p>The objects around us, the make-shifts of fishermen ashore, often made us look
down to see if we were standing on terra firma. In the wells everywhere a block
and tackle were used to raise the bucket, instead of a windlass, and by almost
every house was laid up a spar or a plank or two full of auger-holes, saved
from a wreck. The windmills were partly built of these, and they were worked
into the public bridges. The light-house keeper, who was having his barn
shingled, told me casually that he had made three thousand good shingles for
that purpose out of a mast. You would sometimes see an old oar used for a rail.
Frequently also some fair-weather finery ripped off a vessel by a storm near
the coast was nailed up against an outhouse. I saw fastened to a shed near the
lighthouse a long new sign with the words “A<small>NGLO</small>
S<small>AXON</small>” on it in large gilt letters, as if it were a
useless part which the ship could afford to lose, or which the sailors had
discharged at the same time with the pilot. But it interested somewhat as if it
had been a part of the Argo, clipped off in passing through the Symplegades.</p>
<p>To the fisherman, the Cape itself is a sort of store-ship laden with
supplies,—a safer and larger craft which carries the women and children,
the old men and the sick; and indeed sea-phrases are as common on it as on
board a vessel. Thus is it ever with a sea-going people. The old Northmen used
to speak of the “keel-ridge” of the country, that is, the ridge of
the Doffrafield Mountains, as if the land were a boat turned bottom up. I was
frequently reminded of the Northmen here. The inhabitants of the Cape are often
at once farmers and sea-rovers; they are more than vikings or kings of the
bays, for their sway extends over the open sea also. A farmer in Wellfleet, at
whose house I afterward spent a night, who had raised fifty bushels of potatoes
the previous year, which is a large crop for the Cape, and had extensive
salt-works, pointed to his schooner, which lay in sight, in which he and his
man and boy occasionally ran down the coast a-trading as far as the Capes of
Virginia. This was his market-cart, and his hired man knew how to steer her.
Thus he drove two teams a-field,</p>
<p class="poem">
“ere the high <i>seas</i> appeared<br/>
Under the opening eyelids of the morn.”</p>
<p>Though probably he would not hear much of the “gray fly” on his way
to Virginia.</p>
<p>A great proportion of the inhabitants of the Cape are always thus abroad about
their teaming on some ocean highway or other, and the history of one of their
ordinary trips would cast the Argonautic expedition into the shade. I have just
heard of a Cape Cod captain who was expected home in the beginning of the
winter from the West Indies, but was long since given up for lost, till his
relations at length have heard with joy, that, after getting within forty miles
of Cape Cod light, he was driven back by nine successive gales to Key West,
between Florida and Cuba, and was once again shaping his course for home. Thus
he spent his winter. In ancient times the adventures of these two or three men
and boys would have been made the basis of a myth, but now such tales are
crowded into a line of shorthand signs, like an algebraic formula in the
shipping news. “Wherever over the world,” said Palfrey in his
oration at Barnstable, “you see the stars and stripes floating, you may
have good hope that beneath them some one will be found who can tell you the
soundings of Barnstable, or Wellfleet, or Chatham Harbor.”</p>
<p>I passed by the home of somebody’s (or everybody’s) Uncle Bill, one
day over on the Plymouth shore. It was a schooner half keeled-up on the mud: we
aroused the master out of a sound sleep at noonday, by thumping on the bottom
of his vessel till he presented himself at the hatchway, for we wanted to
borrow his clam-digger. Meaning to make him a call, I looked out the next
morning, and lo! he had run over to “the Pines” the evening before,
fearing an easterly storm. He outrode the <i>great</i> gale in the spring of
1851, dashing about alone in Plymouth Bay. He goes after rockweed, lighters
vessels, and saves wrecks. I still saw him lying in the mud over at “the
Pines” in the horizon, which place he could not leave if he would till
flood tide. But he would not then probably. This waiting for the tide is a
singular feature in life by the sea-shore. A frequent answer is, “Well!
you can’t start for two hours yet.” It is something new to a
landsman, and at first he is not disposed to wait. History says that “two
inhabitants of Truro were the first who adventured to the Falkland Isles in
pursuit of whales. This voyage was undertaken in the year 1774, by the advice
of Admiral Montague of the British navy, and was crowned with success.”</p>
<p>At the Pond Village we saw a pond three eighths of a mile long densely filled
with cat-tail flags, seven feet high,—enough for all the coopers in New
England.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus22"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/pondvillage.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="326" alt="Pond Village" title="" /> <p class="caption">Pond Village</p> </div>
<p>The western shore was nearly as sandy as the eastern, but the water was much
smoother, and the bottom was partially covered with the slender grass-like
seaweed (<i>Zostera</i>), which we had not seen on the Atlantic side; there
were also a few rude sheds for trying fish on the beach there, which made it
appear less wild. In the few marshes on this side we afterward saw Samphire,
Rosemary, and other plants new to us inlanders.</p>
<p>In the summer and fall sometimes, hundreds of blackfish (the Social Whale,
<i>Globicephalus Melas</i> of De Kay; called also Black Whale-fish, Howling
Whale, Bottlehead, etc.), fifteen feet or more in length, are driven ashore in
a single school here. I witnessed such a scene in July, 1855. A carpenter who
was working at the lighthouse arriving early in the morning remarked that he
did not know but he had lost fifty dollars by coming to his work; for as he
came along the Bay side he heard them driving a school of blackfish ashore, and
he had debated with himself whether he should not go and join them and take his
share, but had concluded to come to his work. After breakfast I came over to
this place, about two miles distant, and near the beach met some of the
fishermen returning from their chase. Looking up and down the shore, I could
see about a mile south some large black masses on the sand, which I knew must
be blackfish, and a man or two about them. As I walked along towards them I
soon came to a huge carcass whose head was gone and whose blubber had been
stripped off some weeks before; the tide was just beginning to move it, and the
stench compelled me to go a long way round. When I came to Great Hollow I found
a fisherman and some boys on the watch, and counted about thirty blackfish,
just killed, with many lance wounds, and the water was more or less bloody
around. They were partly on shore and partly in the water, held by a rope round
their tails till the tide should leave them. A boat had been somewhat stove by
the tail of one. They were a smooth shining black, like India-rubber, and had
remarkably simple and lumpish forms for animated creatures, with a blunt round
snout or head, whale-like, and simple stiff-looking flippers. The largest were
about fifteen feet long, but one or two were only five feet long, and still
without teeth. The fisherman slashed one with his jackknife, to show me how
thick the blubber was,—about three inches; and as I passed my finger
through the cut it was covered thick with oil. The blubber looked like pork,
and this man said that when they were trying it the boys would sometimes come
round with a piece of bread in one hand, and take a piece of blubber in the
other to eat with it, preferring it to pork scraps. He also cut into the flesh
beneath, which was firm and red like beef, and he said that for his part he
preferred it when fresh to beef. It is stated that in 1812 blackfish were used
as food by the poor of Bretagne. They were waiting for the tide to leave these
fishes high and dry, that they might strip off the blubber and carry it to
their try-works in their boats, where they try it on the beach. They get
commonly a barrel of oil, worth fifteen or twenty dollars, to a fish. There
were many lances and harpoons in the boats,—much slenderer instruments
than I had expected. An old man came along the beach with a horse and wagon
distributing the dinners of the fishermen, which their wives had put up in
little pails and jugs, and which he had collected in the Pond Village, and for
this service, I suppose, he received a share of the oil. If one could not tell
his own pail, he took the first he came to.</p>
<p>As I stood there they raised the cry of “another school,” and we
could see their black backs and their blowing about a mile northward, as they
went leaping over the sea like horses. Some boats were already in pursuit
there, driving them toward the beach. Other fishermen and boys running up began
to jump into the boats and push them off from where I stood, and I might have
gone too had I chosen. Soon there were twenty-five or thirty boats in pursuit,
some large ones under sail, and others rowing with might and main, keeping
outside of the school, those nearest to the fishes striking on the sides of
their boats and blowing horns to drive them on to the beach. It was an exciting
race. If they succeed in driving them ashore each boat takes one share, and
then each man, but if they are compelled to strike them off shore each
boat’s company take what they strike. I walked rapidly along the shore
toward the north, while the fishermen were rowing still more swiftly to join
their companions, and a little boy who walked by my side was congratulating
himself that his father’s boat was beating another one. An old blind
fisherman whom we met, inquired, “Where are they? I can’t see. Have
they got them?” In the mean while the fishes had turned and were escaping
northward toward Provincetown, only occasionally the back of one being seen. So
the nearest crews were compelled to strike them, and we saw several boats soon
made fast, each to its fish, which, four or five rods ahead, was drawing it
like a race-horse straight toward the beach, leaping half out of water, blowing
blood and water from its hole, and leaving a streak of foam behind. But they
went ashore too far north for us, though we could see the fishermen leap out
and lance them on the sand. It was just like pictures of whaling which I have
seen, and a fisherman told me that it was nearly as dangerous. In his first
trial he had been much excited, and in his haste had used a lance with its
scabbard on, but nevertheless had thrust it quite through his fish.</p>
<p>I learned that a few days before this one hundred and eighty blackfish had been
driven ashore in one school at Eastham, a little farther south, and that the
keeper of Billingsgate Point light went out one morning about the same time and
cut his initials on the backs of a large school which had run ashore in the
night, and sold his right to them to Provincetown for one thousand dollars, and
probably Provincetown made as much more. Another fisherman told me that
nineteen years ago three hundred and eighty were driven ashore in one school at
Great Hollow. In the Naturalists’ Library, it is said that, in the winter
of 1809-10, one thousand one hundred and ten “approached the shore of
Hralfiord, Iceland, and were captured.” De Kay says it is not known why
they are stranded. But one fisherman declared to me that they ran ashore in
pursuit of squid, and that they generally came on the coast about the last of
July.</p>
<p>About a week afterward, when I came to this shore, it was strewn, as far as I
could see with a glass, with the carcasses of blackfish stripped of their
blubber and their heads cut off; the latter lying higher up. Walking on the
beach was out of the question on account of the stench. Between Provincetown
and Truro they lay in the very path of the stage. Yet no steps were taken to
abate the nuisance, and men were catching lobsters as usual just off the shore.
I was told that they did sometimes tow them out and sink them; yet I wondered
where they got the stones to sink them with. Of course they might be made into
guano, and Cape Cod is not so fertile that her inhabitants can afford to do
without this manure,—to say nothing of the diseases they may produce.</p>
<p>After my return home, wishing to learn what was known about the Blackfish, I
had recourse to the reports of the zoological surveys of the State, and I found
that Storer had rightfully omitted it in his Report on the Fishes, since it is
not a fish; so I turned to Emmons’s Report of the Mammalia, but was
surprised to find that the seals and whales were omitted by him, because he had
had no opportunity to observe them. Considering how this State has risen and
thriven by its fisheries.—that the legislature which authorized the
Zoological Survey sat under the emblem of a codfish,—that Nantucket and
New Bedford are within our limits,—that an early riser may find a
thousand or fifteen hundred dollars’ worth of blackfish on the shore in a
morning,—that the Pilgrims saw the Indians cutting up a blackfish on the
shore at Eastham, and called a part of that shore “Grampus Bay,”
from the number of blackfish they found there, before they got to
Plymouth,—and that from that time to this these fishes have continued to
enrich one or two counties almost annually, and that their decaying carcasses
were now poisoning the air of one county for more than thirty miles,—I
thought it remarkable that neither the popular nor scientific name was to be
found in a report on our mammalia,—a catalogue of the productions of our
land and water.</p>
<p>We had here, as well as all across the Cape, a fair view of Provincetown, five
or six miles distant over the water toward the west, under its shrubby
sand-hills, with its harbor now full of vessels whose masts mingled with the
spires of its churches, and gave it the appearance of a quite large seaport
town.</p>
<p>The inhabitants of all the lower Cape towns enjoy thus the prospect of two
seas. Standing on the western or larboard shore, and looking across to where
the distant mainland looms, they can say, This is Massachusetts Bay; and then,
after an hour’s sauntering walk, they may stand on the starboard side,
beyond which no land is seen to loom, and say, This is the Atlantic Ocean.</p>
<p>On our way back to the lighthouse, by whose white-washed tower we steered as
securely as the mariner by its light at night, we passed through a graveyard,
which apparently was saved from being blown away by its slates, for they had
enabled a thick bed of huckleberry-bushes to root themselves amid the graves.
We thought it would be worth the while to read the epitaphs where so many were
lost at sea; however, as not only their lives, but commonly their bodies also,
were lost or not identified, there were fewer epitaphs of this sort than we
expected, though there were not a few. Their graveyard is the ocean. Near the
eastern side we started up a fox in a hollow, the only kind of wild quadruped,
if I except a skunk in a salt-marsh, that we saw in all our walk (unless
painted and box tortoises may be called quadrupeds). He was a large, plump,
shaggy fellow, like a yellow dog, with, as usual, a white tip to his tail, and
looked as if he fared well on the Cape. He cantered away into the shrub-oaks
and bayberry-bushes which chanced to grow there, but were hardly high enough to
conceal him. I saw another the next summer leaping over the top of a beach-plum
a little farther north, a small arc of his course (which I trust is not yet
run), from which I endeavored in vain to calculate his whole orbit: there were
too many unknown attractions to be allowed for. I also saw the exuviae of a
third fast sinking into the sand, and added the skull to my collection. Hence I
concluded that they must be plenty thereabouts; but a traveller may meet with
more than an inhabitant, since he is more likely to take an unfrequented route
across the country. They told me that in some years they died off in great
numbers by a kind of madness, under the effect of which they were seen whirling
round and round as if in pursuit of their tails. In Crantz’s account of
Greenland, he says: “They (the foxes) live upon birds and their eggs,
and, when they can’t get them, upon crowberries, mussels, crabs, and what
the sea casts out.”</p>
<p>Just before reaching the light-house, we saw the sun set in the Bay,—for
standing on that narrow Cape was, as I have said, like being on the deck of a
vessel, or rather at the masthead of a man-of-war, thirty miles at sea, though
we knew that at the same moment the sun was setting behind our native hills,
which were just below the horizon in that direction. This sight drove
everything else quite out of our heads, and Homer and the Ocean came in again
with a rush,—</p>
<p class="letter">
Ἐν δ’ ἔπεσ’
Ὠκεανῷ
λαμπρὸν φάος
ἠελίοιο,</p>
<p>the shining torch of the sun fell into the ocean.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap08"></SPAN>VIII<br/> THE HIGHLAND LIGHT</h2>
<p>This light-house, known to mariners as the Cape Cod or Highland Light, is one
of our “primary sea-coast lights,” and is usually the first seen by
those approaching the entrance of Massachusetts Bay from Europe. It is
forty-three miles from Cape Ann Light, and forty-one from Boston Light. It
stands about twenty rods from the edge of the bank, which is here formed of
clay. I borrowed the plane and square, level and dividers, of a carpenter who
was shingling a barn near by, and using one of those shingles made of a mast,
contrived a rude sort of quadrant, with pins for sights and pivots, and got the
angle of elevation of the Bank opposite the light-house, and with a couple of
cod-lines the length of its slope, and so measured its height on the shingle.
It rises one hundred and ten feet above its immediate base, or about one
hundred and twenty-three feet above mean low water. Graham, who has carefully
surveyed the extremity of the Cape, makes it one hundred and thirty feet. The
mixed sand and clay lay at an angle of forty degrees with the horizon, where I
measured it, but the clay is generally much steeper. No cow nor hen ever gets
down it. Half a mile farther south the bank is fifteen or twenty-five feet
higher, and that appeared to be the highest land in North Truro. Even this vast
clay bank is fast wearing away. Small streams of water trickling down it at
intervals of two or three rods, have left the intermediate clay in the form of
steep Gothic roofs fifty feet high or more, the ridges as sharp and
rugged-looking as rocks; and in one place the bank is curiously eaten out in
the form of a large semicircular crater.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus23"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/dragging.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="300" alt="Dragging a dory up on the beach" title="" /> <p class="caption">Dragging a dory up on the beach</p> </div>
<p>According to the light-house keeper, the Cape is wasting here on both sides,
though most on the eastern. In some places it had lost many rods within the
last year, and, erelong, the light-house must be moved. We calculated, <i>from
his data</i>, how soon the Cape would be quite worn away at this point,
“for,” said he, “I can remember sixty years back.” We
were even more surprised at this last announcement,—that is, at the slow
waste of life and energy in our informant, for we had taken him to be not more
than forty,—than at the rapid wasting of the Cape, and we thought that he
stood a fair chance to outlive the former.</p>
<p>Between this October and June of the next year I found that the bank had lost
about forty feet in one place, opposite the light-house, and it was cracked
more than forty feet farther from the edge at the last date, the shore being
strewn with the recent rubbish. But I judged that generally it was not wearing
away here at the rate of more than six feet annually. Any conclusions drawn
from the observations of a few years or one generation only are likely to prove
false, and the Cape may balk expectation by its durability. In some places even
a wrecker’s foot-path down the bank lasts several years. One old
inhabitant told us that when the light-house was built, in 1798, it was
calculated that it would stand forty-five years, allowing the bank to waste one
length of fence each year, “but,” said he, “there it
is” (or rather another near the same site, about twenty rods from the
edge of the bank).</p>
<p>The sea is not gaining on the Cape everywhere, for one man told me of a vessel
wrecked long ago on the north of Provincetown whose “bones” (this
was his word) are still visible many rods within the present line of the beach,
half buried in sand. Perchance they lie alongside the timbers of a whale. The
general statement of the inhabitants is that the Cape is wasting on both sides,
but extending itself on particular points on the south and west, as at Chatham
and Monomoy Beaches, and at Billingsgate, Long, and Race Points. James Freeman
stated in his day that above three miles had been added to Monomoy Beach during
the previous fifty years, and it is said to be still extending as fast as ever.
A writer in the Massachusetts Magazine, in the last century, tells us that
“when the English first settled upon the Cape, there was an island off
Chatham, at three leagues’ distance, called Webbs’ Island,
containing twenty acres, covered with red-cedar or savin. The inhabitants of
Nantucket used to carry wood from it”; but he adds that in his day a
large rock alone marked the spot, and the water was six fathoms deep there. The
entrance to Nauset Harbor, which was once in Eastham, has now travelled south
into Orleans. The islands in Wellfleet Harbor once formed a continuous beach,
though now small vessels pass between them. And so of many other parts of this
coast.</p>
<p>Perhaps what the Ocean takes from one part of the Cape it gives to
another,—robs Peter to pay Paul. On the eastern side the sea appears to
be everywhere encroaching on the land. Not only the land is undermined, and its
ruins carried off by currents, but the sand is blown from the beach directly up
the steep bank where it is one hundred and fifty feet high, and covers the
original surface there many feet deep. If you sit on the edge you will have
ocular demonstration of this by soon getting your eyes full. Thus the bank
preserves its height as fast as it is worn away. This sand is steadily
travelling westward at a rapid rate, “more than a hundred yards,”
says one writer, within the memory of inhabitants now living; so that in some
places peat-meadows are buried deep under the sand, and the peat is cut through
it; and in one place a large peat-meadow has made its appearance on the shore
in the bank covered many feet deep, and peat has been cut there. This accounts
for that great pebble of peat which we saw in the surf. The old oysterman had
told us that many years ago he lost a “crittur” by her being mired
in a swamp near the Atlantic side east of his house, and twenty years ago he
lost the swamp itself entirely, but has since seen signs of it appearing on the
beach. He also said that he had seen cedar stumps “as big as
cart-wheels”(!) on the bottom of the Bay, three miles off Billingsate
Point, when leaning over the side of his boat in pleasant weather, and that
that was dry land not long ago. Another told us that a log canoe known to have
been buried many years before on the Bay side at East Harbor in Truro, where
the Cape is extremely narrow, appeared at length on the Atlantic side, the Cape
having rolled over it, and an old woman said,—“Now, you see, it is
true what I told you, that the Cape is moving.”</p>
<p>The bars along the coast shift with every storm, and in many places there is
occasionally none at all. We ourselves observed the effect of a single storm
with a high tide in the night, in July, 1855. It moved the sand on the beach
opposite the light-house to the depth of six feet, and three rods in width as
far as we could see north and south, and carried it bodily off no one knows
exactly where, laying bare in one place a large rock five feet high which was
invisible before, and narrowing the beach to that extent. There is usually, as
I have said, no bathing on the back-side of the Cape, on account of the
undertow, but when we were there last, the sea had, three months before, cast
up a bar near this lighthouse, two miles long and ten rods wide, over which the
tide did not flow, leaving a narrow cove, then a quarter of a mile long,
between it and the shore, which afforded excellent bathing. This cove had from
time to time been closed up as the bar travelled northward, in one instance
imprisoning four or five hundred whiting and cod, which died there, and the
water as often turned fresh, and finally gave place to sand. This bar, the
inhabitants assured us, might be wholly removed, and the water six feet deep
there in two or three days.</p>
<p>The light-house keeper said that when the wind blowed strong on to the shore,
the waves ate fast into the bank, but when it blowed off they took no sand
away; for in the former case the wind heaped up the surface of the water next
to the beach, and to preserve its equilibrium a strong undertow immediately set
back again into the sea which carried with it the sand and whatever else was in
the way, and left the beach hard to walk on; but in the latter case the
undertow set on and carried the sand with it, so that it was particularly
difficult for shipwrecked men to get to land when the wind blowed on to the
shore, but easier when it blowed off. This undertow, meeting the next surface
wave on the bar which itself has made, forms part of the dam over which the
latter breaks, as over an upright wall. The sea thus plays with the land
holding a sand-bar in its mouth awhile before it swallows it, as a cat plays
with a mouse; but the fatal gripe is sure to come at last. The sea sends its
rapacious east wind to rob the land, but before the former has got far with its
prey, the land sends its honest west wind to recover some of its own. But,
according to Lieutenant Davis, the forms, extent, and distribution of sand-bars
and banks are principally determined, not by winds and waves but by tides.</p>
<p>Our host said that you would be surprised if you were on the beach when the
wind blew a hurricane directly on to it, to see that none of the drift-wood
came ashore, but all was carried directly northward and parallel with the shore
as fast as a man can walk, by the inshore current, which sets strongly in that
direction at flood tide. The strongest swimmers also are carried along with it,
and never gain an inch toward the beach. Even a large rock has been moved half
a mile northward along-the beach. He assured us that the sea was never still on
the back-side of the Cape, but ran commonly as high as your head, so that a
great part of the time you could not launch a boat there, and even in the
calmest weather the waves run six or eight feet up the beach, though then you
could get off on a plank. Champlain and Pourtrincourt could not land here in
1606, on account of the swell (<i>la houlle</i>), yet the savages came off to
them in a canoe. In the Sieur de la Borde’s “Relation des
Caraibes,” my edition of which was published at Amsterdam in 1711, at
page 530 he says:—</p>
<p>“Couroumon a Caraibe, also a star [<i>i.e.</i> a god], makes the great
<i>lames à la mer</i>, and overturns canoes. <i>Lames à la mer</i> are the long
<i>vagues</i> which are not broken (<i>entrecoupées</i>), and such as one sees
come to land all in one piece, from one end of a beach to another, so that,
however little wind there may be, a shallop or a canoe could hardly land
(<i>aborder terre</i>) without turning over, or being filled with water.”</p>
<p>But on the Bay side the water even at its edge is often as smooth and still as
in a pond. Commonly there are no boats used along this beach. There was a boat
belonging to the Highland Light which the next keeper after he had been there a
year had not launched, though he said that there was good fishing just off the
shore. Generally the Life Boats cannot be used when needed. When the waves run
very high it is impossible to get a boat off, however skilfully you steer it,
for it will often be completely covered by the curving edge of the approaching
breaker as by an arch, and so filled with water, or it will be lifted up by its
bows, turned directly over backwards, and all the contents spilled out. A spar
thirty feet long is served in the same way.</p>
<p>I heard of a party who went off fishing back of Wellfleet some years ago, in
two boats, in calm weather, who, when they had laden their boats with fish, and
approached the land again, found such a swell breaking on it, though there was
no wind, that they were afraid to enter it. At first they thought to pull for
Provincetown, but night was coming on, and that was many miles distant. Their
case seemed a desperate one. As often as they approached the shore and saw the
terrible breakers that intervened, they were deterred. In short, they were
thoroughly frightened. Finally, having thrown their fish overboard, those in
one boat chose a favorable opportunity, and succeeded, by skill and good luck,
in reaching the land, but they were unwilling to take the responsibility of
telling the others when to come in, and as the other helmsman was
inexperienced, their boat was swamped at once, yet all managed to save
themselves.</p>
<p>Much smaller waves soon make a boat “nail-sick,” as the phrase is.
The keeper said that after a long and strong blow there would be three large
waves, each successively larger than the last, and then no large ones for some
time, and that, when they wished to land in a boat, they came in on the last
and largest wave. Sir Thomas Browne (as quoted in Brand’s Popular
Antiquities, p. 372), on the subject of the tenth wave being “greater or
more dangerous than any other,” after quoting Ovid,—</p>
<p class="poem">
“Qui venit hic fluctus, fluctus supereminet omnes<br/>
Posterior nono est, undecimo que prior,”—</p>
<p>says, “Which, notwithstanding, is evidently false; nor can it be made out
either by observation either upon the shore or the ocean, as we have with
diligence explored in both. And surely in vain we expect regularity in the
waves of the sea, or in the particular motions thereof, as we may in its
general reciprocations, whose causes are constant, and effects therefore
correspondent; whereas its fluctuations are but motions subservient, which
winds, storms, shores, shelves, and every interjacency, irregulates.”</p>
<p>We read that the Clay Pounds, were so called “because vessels have had
the misfortune to be pounded against it in gales of wind,” which we
regard as a doubtful derivation. There are small ponds here, upheld by the
clay, which were formerly called the Clay Pits. Perhaps this, or Clay Ponds, is
the origin of the name. Water is found in the clay quite near the surface; but
we heard of one man who had sunk a well in the sand close by, “till he
could see stars at noonday,” without finding any. Over this bare Highland
the wind has full sweep. Even in July it blows the wings over the heads of the
young turkeys, which do not know enough to head against it; and in gales the
doors and windows are blown in, and you must hold on to the lighthouse to
prevent being blown into the Atlantic. They who merely keep out on the beach in
a storm in the winter are sometimes rewarded by the Humane Society. If you
would feel the full force of a tempest, take up your residence on the top of
Mount Washington, or at the Highland Light, in Truro.</p>
<p>It was said in 1794 that more vessels were cast away on the east shore of Truro
than anywhere in Barnstable County. Notwithstanding that this light-house has
since been erected, after almost every storm we read of one or more vessels
wrecked here, and sometimes more than a dozen wrecks are visible from this
point at one time. The inhabitants hear the crash of vessels going to pieces as
they sit round their hearths, and they commonly date from some memorable
shipwreck. If the history of this beach could be written from beginning to end,
it would be a thrilling page in the history of commerce.</p>
<p>Truro was settled in the year 1700 as <i>Dangerfield</i>. This was a very
appropriate name, for I afterward read on a monument in the graveyard, near
Pamet River, the following inscription:—</p>
<p class="center">
Sacred<br/>
to the memory of<br/>
57 citizens of Truro,<br/>
who were lost in seven<br/>
vessels, which<br/>
foundered at sea in<br/>
the memorable gale<br/>
of Oct. 3d, 1841.</p>
<p>Their names and ages by families were recorded on different sides of the stone.
They are said to have been lost on George’s Bank, and I was told that
only one vessel drifted ashore on the backside of the Cape, with the boys
locked into the cabin and drowned. It is said that the homes of all were
“within a circuit of two miles.” Twenty-eight inhabitants of Dennis
were lost in the same gale; and I read that “in one day, immediately
after this storm, nearly or quite one hundred bodies were taken up and buried
on Cape Cod.” The Truro Insurance Company failed for want of skippers to
take charge of its vessels. But the surviving inhabitants went a-fishing again
the next year as usual. I found that it would not do to speak of shipwrecks
there, for almost every family has lost some of its members at sea. “Who
lives in that house?” I inquired. “Three widows,” was the
reply. The stranger and the inhabitant view the shore with very different eyes.
The former may have come to see and admire the ocean in a storm; but the latter
looks on it as the scene where his nearest relatives were wrecked. When I
remarked to an old wrecker partially blind, who was sitting on the edge of the
bank smoking a pipe, which he had just lit with a match of dried beach-grass,
that I supposed he liked to hear the sound of the surf, he answered: “No,
I do not like to hear the sound of the surf.” He had lost at least one
son in “the memorable gale,” and could tell many a tale of the
shipwrecks which he had witnessed there.</p>
<p>In the year 1717, a noted pirate named Bellamy was led on to the bar off
Wellfleet by the captain of a <i>snow</i> which he had taken, to whom he had
offered his vessel again if he would pilot him into Provincetown Harbor.
Tradition says that the latter threw over a burning tar-barrel in the night,
which drifted ashore, and the pirates followed it. A storm coming on, their
whole fleet was wrecked, and more than a hundred dead bodies lay along the
shore. Six who escaped shipwreck were executed. “At times to this
day” (1793), says the historian of Wellfleet, “there are King
William and Queen Mary’s coppers picked up, and pieces of silver called
cob-money. The violence of the seas moves the sands on the outer bar, so that
at times the iron caboose of the ship [that is, Bellamy’s] at low ebbs
has been seen.” Another tells us that, “For many years after this
shipwreck, a man of a very singular and frightful aspect used every spring and
autumn to be seen travelling on the Cape, who was supposed to have been one of
Bellamy’s crew. The presumption is that he went to some place where money
had been secreted by the pirates, to get such a supply as his exigencies
required. When he died, many pieces of gold were found in a girdle which he
constantly wore.”</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus24"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/wrecker.jpg" width-obs="281" height-obs="450" alt="An old wrecker at home" title="" /> <p class="caption">An old wrecker at home</p> </div>
<p>As I was walking on the beach here in my last visit, looking for shells and
pebbles, just after that storm, which I have mentioned as moving the sand to a
great depth, not knowing but I might find some cob-money, I did actually pick
up a French crown piece, worth about a dollar and six cents, near high-water
mark, on the still moist sand, just under the abrupt, caving base of the bank.
It was of a dark slate color, and looked like a flat pebble, but still bore a
very distinct and handsome head of Louis XV., and the usual legend on the
reverse. <i>Sit Nomen Domini Benedictum</i> (Blessed be the Name of the Lord),
a pleasing sentiment to read in the sands of the sea-shore, whatever it might
be stamped on, and I also made out the date, 1741. Of course, I thought at
first that it was that same old button which I have found so many times, but my
knife soon showed the silver. Afterward, rambling on the bars at low tide, I
cheated my companion by holding up round shells (<i>Scutellæ</i>) between my
fingers, whereupon he quickly stripped and came off to me.</p>
<p>In the Revolution, a British ship of war called the Somerset was wrecked near
the Clay Pounds, and all on board, some hundreds in number, were taken
prisoners. My informant said that he had never seen any mention of this in the
histories, but that at any rate he knew of a silver watch, which one of those
prisoners by accident left there, which was still going to tell the story. But
this event is noticed by some writers.</p>
<p>The next summer I saw a sloop from Chatham dragging for anchors and chains just
oft’ this shore. She had her boats out at the work while she shuffled
about on various tacks, and, when anything was found, drew up to hoist it on
board. It is a singular employment, at which men are regularly hired and paid
for their industry, to hunt to-day in pleasant weather for anchors which have
been lost,—the sunken faith and hope of mariners, to which they trusted
in vain; now, perchance, it is the rusty one of some old pirate’s ship or
Norman fisherman, whose cable parted here two hundred years ago; and now the
best bower anchor of a Canton or a California ship, which has gone about her
business. If the roadsteads of the spiritual ocean could be thus dragged, what
rusty flukes of hope deceived and parted chain-cables of faith might again be
windlassed aboard! enough to sink the finder’s craft, or stock new navies
to the end of time. The bottom of the sea is strewn with anchors, some deeper
and some shallower, and alternately covered and uncovered by the sand,
perchance with a small length of iron cable still attached,—to which
where is the other end? So many unconcluded tales to be continued another time.
So, if we had diving-bells adapted to the spiritual deeps, we should see
anchors with their cables attached, as thick as eels in vinegar, all wriggling
vainly toward their holding-ground. But that is not treasure for us which
another man has lost; rather it is for us to seek what no other man has found
or can find,—not be Chatham men, dragging for anchors.</p>
<p>The annals of this voracious beach! who could write them, unless it were a
shipwrecked sailor? How many who have seen it have seen it only in the midst of
danger and distress, the last strip of earth which their mortal eyes beheld.
Think of the amount of suffering which a single strand has witnessed. The
ancients would have represented it as a sea-monster with open jaws, more
terrible than Scylla and Charybdis. An inhabitant of Truro told me that about a
fortnight after the <i>St. John</i> was wrecked at Cohasset he found two bodies
on the shore at the Clay Pounds. They were those of a man, and a corpulent
woman. The man had thick boots on, though his head was off, but “it was
alongside.” It took the finder some weeks to get over the sight. Perhaps
they were man and wife, and whom God had joined the ocean currents had not put
asunder. Yet by what slight accidents at first may they have been associated in
their drifting. Some of the bodies of those passengers were picked up far out
at sea, boxed up and sunk; some brought ashore and buried. There are more
consequences to a shipwreck than the underwriters notice. The Gulf Stream may
return some to their native shores, or drop them in some out-of-the-way cave of
Ocean, where time and the elements will write new riddles with their
bones.—But to return to land again.</p>
<p>In this bank, above the clay, I counted in the summer, two hundred holes of the
Bank Swallow within a space six rods long, and there were at least one thousand
old birds within three times that distance, twittering over the surf. I had
never associated them in my thoughts with the beach before. One little boy who
had been a-birds-nesting had got eighty swallows’ eggs for his share!
Tell it not to the Humane Society. There were many young birds on the clay
beneath, which had tumbled out and died. Also there were many Crow-blackbirds
hopping about in the dry fields, and the Upland Plover were breeding close by
the light-house. The keeper had once cut off one’s wing while mowing, as
she sat on her eggs there. This is also a favorite resort for gunners in the
fall to shoot the Golden Plover. As around the shores of a pond are seen
devil’s-needles, butterflies, etc., so here, to my surprise, I saw at the
same season great devil’s-needles of a size proportionably larger, or
nearly as big as my finger, incessantly coasting up and down the edge of the
bank, and butterflies also were hovering over it, and I never saw so many
dorr-bugs and beetles of various kinds as strewed the beach. They had
apparently flown over the bank in the night, and could not get up again, and
some had perhaps fallen into the sea and were washed ashore. They may have been
in part attracted by the light-house lamps.</p>
<p>The Clay Pounds are a more fertile tract than usual. We saw some fine patches
of roots and corn here. As generally on the Cape, the plants had little stalk
or leaf, but ran remarkably to seed. The corn was hardly more than half as high
as in the interior, yet the ears were large and full, and one farmer told us
that he could raise forty bushels on an acre without manure, and sixty with it.
The heads of the rye also were remarkably large. The Shadbush
(<i>Amelanchier</i>), Beach Plums, and Blueberries (<i>Vaccinium
Pennsylvanicum</i>), like the apple-trees and oaks, were very dwarfish,
spreading over the sand, but at the same time very fruitful. The blueberry was
but an inch or two high, and its fruit often rested on the ground, so that you
did not suspect the presence of the bushes, even on those bare hills, until you
were treading on them. I thought that this fertility must be owing mainly to
the abundance of moisture in the atmosphere, for I observed that what little
grass there was was remarkably laden with dew in the morning, and in summer
dense imprisoning fogs frequently last till midday, turning one’s beard
into a wet napkin about his throat, and the oldest inhabitant may lose his way
within a stone’s throw of his house or be obliged to follow the beach for
a guide. The brick house attached to the light-house was exceedingly damp at
that season, and, writing-paper lost all its stiffness in it. It was impossible
to dry your towel after bathing, or to press flowers without their mildewing.
The air was so moist that we rarely wished to drink, though we could at all
times taste the salt on our lips. Salt was rarely used at table, and our host
told us that his cattle invariably refused it when it was offered them, they
got so much with their grass and at every breath, but he said that a sick horse
or one just from the country would sometimes take a hearty draught of salt
water, and seemed to like it and be the better for it.</p>
<p>It was surprising to see how much water was contained in the terminal bud of
the sea-side golden-rod, standing in the sand early in July, and also how
turnips, beets, carrots, etc., flourished even in pure sand. A man travelling
by the shore near there not long before us noticed something green growing in
the pure sand of the beach, just at high-water mark, and on approaching found
it to be a bed of beets flourishing vigorously, probably from seed washed out
of the <i>Franklin</i>. Also beets and turnips came up in the sea-weed used for
manure in many parts of the Cape. This suggests how various plants may have
been dispersed over the world to distant islands and continents. Vessels, with
seeds in their cargoes, destined for particular ports, where perhaps they were
not needed, have been cast away on desolate islands, and though their crews
perished, some of their seeds have been preserved. Out of many kinds a few
would find a soil and climate adapted to them, become naturalized, and perhaps
drive out the native plants at last, and so fit the land for the habitation of
man. It is an ill wind that blows nobody any good, and for the time lamentable
shipwrecks may thus contribute a new vegetable to a continent’s stock,
and prove on the whole a lasting blessing to its inhabitants. Or winds and
currents might effect the same without the intervention of man. What indeed are
the various succulent plants which grow on the beach but such beds of beets and
turnips, sprung originally from seeds which perhaps were cast on the waters for
this end, though we do not know the <i>Franklin</i> which they came out of? In
ancient times some Mr. Bell (?) was sailing this way in his ark with seeds of
rocket, salt-wort, sandwort, beachgrass, samphire, bayberry, poverty-grass,
etc., all nicely labelled with directions, intending to establish a nursery
somewhere; and did not a nursery get established, though he thought that he had
failed?</p>
<p>About the light-house I observed in the summer the pretty <i>Polygala
polygama</i>, spreading ray-wise flat on the ground, white pasture thistles
(<i>Cirsium pumilum</i>), and amid the shrubbery the <i>Smilax glauca</i>,
which is commonly said not to grow so far north; near the edge of the banks
about half a mile southward, the broom crow-berry (<i>Empetrum Conradii</i>),
for which Plymouth is the only locality in Massachusetts usually named, forms
pretty green mounds four or five feet in diameter by one foot high,—soft,
springy beds for the wayfarer. I saw it afterward in Provincetown, but
prettiest of all the scarlet pimpernel, or poor-man’s weather-glass
(<i>Anagallis-arvensis</i>), greets you in fair weather on almost every square
yard of sand. From Yarmouth, I have received the <i>Chrysopsis falcata</i>
(golden aster), and <i>Vaccinium stamineum</i> (Deerberry or Squaw
Huckleberry), with fruit not edible, sometimes as large as a cranberry (Sept.
7).</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus25"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/highland.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="327" alt="The Highland Light" title="" /> <p class="caption">The Highland Light</p> </div>
<p>The Highland Light-house,<SPAN href="#linknote-5"
name="linknoteref-5"><sup>[1]</sup></SPAN> where we were staying, is a
substantial-looking building of brick, painted white, and surmounted by an iron
cap. Attached to it is the dwelling of the keeper, one story high, also of
brick, and built by government. As we were going to spend the night in a
light-house, we wished to make the most of so novel an experience, and
therefore told our host that we would like to accompany him when he went to
light up. At rather early candle-light he lighted a small Japan lamp, allowing
it to smoke rather more than we like on ordinary occasions, and told us to
follow him. He led the way first through his bedroom, which was placed nearest
to the light-house, and then through a long, narrow, covered passage-way,
between whitewashed walls like a prison entry, into the lower part of the
light-house, where many great butts of oil were arranged around; thence we
ascended by a winding and open iron stairway, with a steadily increasing scent
of oil and lamp-smoke, to a trap-door in an iron floor, and through this into
the lantern. It was a neat building, with everything in apple-pie order, and no
danger of anything rusting there for want of oil. The light consisted of
fifteen argand lamps, placed within smooth concave reflectors twenty-one inches
in diameter, and arranged in two horizontal circles one above the other, facing
every way excepting directly down the Cape. These were surrounded, at a
distance of two or three feet, by large plate-glass windows, which defied the
storms, with iron sashes, on which rested the iron cap. All the iron work,
except the floor, was painted white. And thus the light-house was completed. We
walked slowly round in that narrow space as the keeper lighted each lamp in
succession, conversing with him at the same moment that many a sailor on the
deep witnessed the lighting of the Highland Light. His duty was to fill and
trim and light his lamps, and keep bright the reflectors. He filled them every
morning, and trimmed them commonly once in the course of the night. He
complained of the quality of the oil which was furnished. This house consumes
about eight hundred gallons in a year, which cost not far from one dollar a
gallon; but perhaps a few lives would be saved if better oil were provided.
Another light-house keeper said that the same proportion of winter-strained oil
was sent to the southernmost light-house in the Union as to the most northern.
Formerly, when this light-house had windows with small and thin panes, a severe
storm would sometimes break the glass, and then they were obliged to put up a
wooden shutter in haste to save their lights and reflectors,—and
sometimes in tempests, when the mariner stood most in need of their guidance,
they had thus nearly converted the light-house into a dark lantern, which
emitted only a few feeble rays, and those commonly on the land or lee side. He
spoke of the anxiety and sense of responsibility which he felt in cold and
stormy nights in the winter; when he knew that many a poor fellow was depending
on him, and his lamps burned dimly, the oil being chilled. Sometimes he was
obliged to warm the oil in a kettle in his house at midnight, and fill his
lamps over again,—for he could not have a fire in the light-house, it
produced such a sweat on the windows. His successor told me that he could not
keep too hot a fire in such a case. All this because the oil was poor. The
government lighting the mariners on its wintry coast with summer-strained oil,
to save expense! That were surely a summer-strained mercy.</p>
<p>This keeper’s successor, who kindly entertained me the next year stated
that one extremely cold night, when this and all the neighboring lights were
burning summer oil, but he had been provident enough to reserve a little winter
oil against emergencies, he was waked up with anxiety, and found that his oil
was congealed, and his lights almost extinguished; and when, after many
hours’ exertion, he had succeeded in replenishing his reservoirs with
winter oil at the wick end, and with difficulty had made them burn, he looked
out and found that the other lights in the neighborhood, which were usually
visible to him, had gone out, and he heard afterward that the Pamet River and
Billingsgate Lights also had been extinguished.</p>
<p>Our host said that the frost, too, on the windows caused him much trouble, and
in sultry summer nights the moths covered them and dimmed his lights; sometimes
even small birds flew against the thick plate glass, and were found on the
ground beneath in the morning with their necks broken. In the spring of 1855 he
found nineteen small yellow-birds, perhaps goldfinches or myrtle-birds, thus
lying dead around the light-house; and sometimes in the fall he had seen where
a golden plover had struck the glass in the night, and left the down and the
fatty part of its breast on it.</p>
<p>Thus he struggled, by every method, to keep his light shining before men.
Surely the light-house keeper has a responsible, if an easy, office. When his
lamp goes out, he goes out; or, at most, only one such accident is pardoned.</p>
<p>I thought it a pity that some poor student did not live there, to profit by all
that light, since he would not rob the mariner. “Well,” he said,
“I do sometimes come up here and read the newspaper when they are noisy
down below.” Think of fifteen argand lamps to read the newspaper by!
Government oil!—light, enough, perchance, to read the Constitution by! I
thought that he should read nothing less than his Bible by that light. I had a
classmate who fitted for college by the lamps of a light-house, which was more
light, we think, than the University afforded.</p>
<p>When we had come down and walked a dozen rods from the light-house, we found
that we could not get the full strength of its light on the narrow strip of
land between it and the shore, being too low for the focus, and we saw only so
many feeble and rayless stars; but at forty rods inland we could see to read,
though we were still indebted to only one lamp. Each reflector sent forth a
separate “fan” of light,—one shone on the windmill, and one
in the hollow, while the intervening spaces were in shadow. This light is said
to be visible twenty nautical miles and more from an observer fifteen feet
above the level of the sea. We could see the revolving light at Race Point, the
end of the Cape, about nine miles distant, and also the light on Long Point, at
the entrance of Provincetown Harbor, and one of the distant Plymouth Harbor
Lights, across the Bay, nearly in a range with the last, like a star in the
horizon. The keeper thought that the other Plymouth Light was concealed by
being exactly in a range with the Long Point Light. He told us that the mariner
was sometimes led astray by a mackerel fisher’s lantern, who was afraid
of being run down in the night, or even by a cottager’s light, mistaking
them for some well-known light on the coast, and, when he discovered his
mistake, was wont to curse the prudent fisher or the wakeful cottager without
reason.</p>
<p>Though it was once declared that Providence placed this mass of clay here on
purpose to erect a light-house on, the keeper said that the light-house should
have been erected half a mile farther south, where the coast begins to bend,
and where the light could be seen at the same time with the Nauset Lights, and
distinguished from them. They now talk of building one there. It happens that
the present one is the more useless now, so near the extremity of the Cape,
because other light-houses have since been erected there.</p>
<p>Among the many regulations of the Light-house Board, hanging against the wall
here, many of them excellent, perhaps, if there were a regiment stationed here
to attend to them, there is one requiring the keeper to keep an account of the
number of vessels which pass his light during the day. But there are a hundred
vessels in sight at once, steering in all directions, many on the very verge of
the horizon, and he must have more eyes than Argus, and be a good deal
farther-sighted, to tell which are passing his light. It is an employment in
some respects best suited to the habits of the gulls which coast up and down
here, and circle over the sea.</p>
<p>I was told by the next keeper, that on the 8th of June following, a
particularly clear and beautiful morning, he rose about half an hour before
sunrise, and having a little time to spare, for his custom was to extinguish
his lights at sunrise, walked down toward the shore to see what he might find.
When he got to the edge of the bank he looked up, and, to his astonishment, saw
the sun rising, and already part way above the horizon. Thinking that his clock
was wrong, he made haste back, and though it was still too early by the clock,
extinguished his lamps, and when he had got through and come down, he looked
out the window, and, to his still greater astonishment, saw the sun just where
it was before, two-thirds above the horizon. He showed me where its rays fell
on the wall across the room. He proceeded to make a fire, and when he had done,
there was the sun still at the same height. Whereupon, not trusting to his own
eyes any longer, he called up his wife to look at it, and she saw it also.
There were vessels in sight on the ocean, and their crews, too, he said, must
have seen it, for its rays fell on them. It remained at that height for about
fifteen minutes by the clock, and then rose as usual, and nothing else
extraordinary happened during that day. Though accustomed to the coast, he had
never witnessed nor heard of such a phenomenon before. I suggested that there
might have been a cloud in the horizon invisible to him, which rose with the
sun, and his clock was only as accurate as the average; or perhaps, as he
denied the possibility of this, it was such a looming of the sun as is said to
occur at Lake Superior and elsewhere. Sir John Franklin, for instance, says in
his Narrative, that when he was on the shore of the Polar Sea, the horizontal
refraction varied so much one morning that “the upper limb of the sun
twice appeared at the horizon before it finally rose.”</p>
<p>He certainly must be a son of Aurora to whom the sun looms, when there are so
many millions to whom it <i>glooms</i> rather, or who never see it till an hour
<i>after</i> it has risen. But it behooves us old stagers to keep our lamps
trimmed and burning to the last, and not trust to the sun’s looming.</p>
<p>This keeper remarked that the centre of the flame should be exactly opposite
the centre of the reflectors, and that accordingly, if he was not careful to
turn down his wicks in the morning, the sun falling on the reflectors on the
south side of the building would set fire to them, like a burning-glass, in the
coldest day, and he would look up at noon and see them all lighted! When your
light is ready to give light, it is readiest to receive it, and the sun will
light it. His successor said that he had never known them to blaze in such a
case, but merely to smoke.</p>
<p>I saw that this was a place of wonders. In a sea turn or shallow fog while I
was there the next summer, it being clear overhead, the edge of the bank twenty
rods distant, appeared like a mountain pasture in the horizon. I was completely
deceived by it, and I could then understand why mariners sometimes ran ashore
in such cases, especially in the night, supposing it to be far away, though
they could see the land. Once since this, being in a large oyster boat two or
three hundred miles from here, in a dark night, when there was a thin veil of
mist on land and water, we came so near to running on to the land before our
skipper was aware of it, that the first warning was my hearing the sound of the
surf under my elbow. I could almost have jumped ashore, and we were obliged to
go about very suddenly to prevent striking. The distant light for which we were
steering, supposing it a light-house five or six miles off, came through the
cracks of a fisherman’s bunk not more than six rods distant.</p>
<p>The keeper entertained us handsomely in his solitary little ocean house. He was
a man of singular patience and intelligence, who, when our queries struck him,
rung as clear as a bell in response. The light-house lamps a few feet distant
shone full into my chamber, and made it as bright as day, so I knew exactly how
the Highland Light bore all that night, and I was in no danger of being
wrecked. Unlike the last, this was as still as a summer night. I thought, as I
lay there, half awake and half asleep, looking upward through the window at the
lights above my head, how many sleepless eyes from far out on the Ocean
stream—mariners of all nations spinning their yarns through the various
watches of the night—were directed toward my couch.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-5" id="linknote-5"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-5">[1]</SPAN>
The light-house has since been rebuilt, and shows a <i>Fresnel</i> light.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap09"></SPAN>IX<br/> THE SEA AND THE DESERT</h2>
<p>The light-house lamps were still burning, though now with a silvery lustre,
when I rose to see the sun come out of the Ocean; for he still rose eastward of
us; but I was convinced that he must have come out of a dry bed beyond that
stream, though he seemed to come out of the water.</p>
<p class="poem">
“The sun once more touched the fields,<br/>
Mounting to heaven from the fair flowing<br/>
Deep-running Ocean.”</p>
<p>Now we saw countless sails of mackerel fishers abroad on the deep, one fleet in
the north just pouring round the Cape, another standing down toward Chatham,
and our host’s son went off to join some lagging member of the first
which had not yet left the Bay.</p>
<p>Before we left the light-house we were obliged to anoint our shoes faithfully
with tallow, for walking on the beach, in the salt water and the sand, had
turned them red and crisp. To counterbalance this, I have remarked that the
seashore, even where muddy, as it is not here, is singularly clean; for
notwithstanding the spattering of the water and mud and squirting of the clams
while walking to and from the boat, your best black pants retain no stain nor
dirt, such as they would acquire from walking in the country.</p>
<p>We have heard that a few days after this, when the Provincetown Bank was
robbed, speedy emissaries from Provincetown made particular inquiries
concerning us at this light-house. Indeed, they traced us all the way down the
Cape, and concluded that we came by this unusual route down the back-side and
on foot, in order that we might discover a way to get off with our booty when
we had committed the robbery. The Cape is so long and narrow, and so bare
withal, that it is wellnigh impossible for a stranger to visit it without the
knowledge of its inhabitants generally, unless he is wrecked on to it in the
night. So, when this robbery occurred, all their suspicions seem to have at
once centred on us two travellers who had just passed down it. If we had not
chanced to leave the Cape so soon, we should probably have been arrested. The
real robbers were two young men from Worcester County who travelled with a
centre-bit, and are said to have done their work very neatly. But the only bank
that we pried into was the great Cape Cod sand-bank, and we robbed it only of
an old French crown piece, some shells and pebbles, and the materials of this
story.</p>
<p>Again we took to the beach for another day (October 13), walking along the
shore of the resounding sea, determined to get it into us. We wished to
associate with the Ocean until it lost the pond-like look which it wears to a
country-man. We still thought that we could see the other side. Its surface was
still more sparkling than the day before, and we beheld “the countless
smilings of the ocean waves”; though some of them were pretty broad
grins, for still the wind blew and the billows broke in foam along the beach.
The nearest beach to us on the other side, whither we looked, due east, was on
the coast of Galicia, in Spain, whose capital is Santiago, though by old
poets’ reckoning it should have been Atlantis or the Hesperides; but
heaven is found to be farther west now. At first we were abreast of that part
of Portugal <i>entre Douro e Mino</i>, and then Galicia and the port of
Pontevedra opened to us as we walked along; but we did not enter, the breakers
ran so high. The bold headland of Cape Finisterre, a little north of east,
jutted toward us next, with its vain brag, for we flung back,—“Here
is Cape Cod,—Cape Land’s-Beginning.” A little indentation
toward the north,—for the land loomed to our imaginations by a common
mirage,—we knew was the Bay of Biscay, and we sang:—</p>
<p class="poem">
“There we lay, till next day.<br/>
In the Bay of Biscay O!”</p>
<p>A little south of east was Palos, where Columbus weighed anchor, and farther
yet the pillars which Hercules set up; concerning which when we inquired at the
top of our voices what was written on them,—for we had the morning sun in
our faces, and could not see distinctly,—the inhabitants shouted <i>Ne
plus ultra</i> (no more beyond), but the wind bore to us the truth only,
<i>plus ultra</i> (more beyond), and over the Bay westward was echoed
<i>ultra</i> (beyond). We spoke to them through the surf about the Far West,
the true Hesperia, ἕω πέρας or end of the
day, the This Side Sundown, where the sun was extinguished in the
<i>Pacific</i>, and we advised them to pull up stakes and plant those pillars
of theirs on the shore of California, whither all our folks were
gone,—the only <i>ne</i> plus ultra now. Whereat they looked crestfallen
on their cliffs, for we had taken the wind out of all their sails.</p>
<p>We could not perceive that any of their leavings washed up here, though we
picked up a child’s toy, a small dismantled boat, which may have been
lost at Pontevedra.</p>
<p>The Cape became narrower and narrower as we approached its wrist between Truro
and Provincetown, and the shore inclined more decidedly to the west. At the
head of East Harbor Creek, the Atlantic is separated but by half a dozen rods
of sand from the tide-waters of the Bay. From the Clay Pounds the bank flatted
off for the last ten miles to the extremity at Race Point, though the highest
parts, which are called “islands” from their appearance at a
distance on the sea, were still seventy or eighty feet above the Atlantic, and
afforded a good view of the latter, as well as a constant view of the Bay,
there being no trees nor a hill sufficient to interrupt it. Also the sands
began to invade the land more and more, until finally they had entire
possession from sea to sea, at the narrowest part. For three or four miles
between Truro and Provincetown there were no inhabitants from shore to shore,
and there were but three or four houses for twice that distance.</p>
<p>As we plodded along, either by the edge of the ocean, where the sand was
rapidly drinking up the last wave that wet it, or over the sand-hills of the
bank, the mackerel fleet continued to pour round the Cape north of us, ten or
fifteen miles distant, in countless numbers, schooner after schooner, till they
made a city on the water. They were so thick that many appeared to be afoul of
one another; now all standing on this tack, now on that. We saw how well the
New-Englanders had followed up Captain John Smith’s suggestions with
regard to the fisheries, made in 1616,—to what a pitch they had carried
“this contemptible trade of fish,” as he significantly styles it,
and were now equal to the Hollanders whose example he holds up for the English
to emulate; notwithstanding that “in this faculty,” as he says,
“the former are so naturalized, and of their vents so certainly
acquainted, as there is no likelihood they will ever be paralleled, having two
or three thousand busses, flat-bottoms, sword-pinks, todes, and such like, that
breeds them sailors, mariners, soldiers, and merchants, never to be wrought out
of that trade and fit for any other.” We thought that it would take all
these names and more to describe the numerous craft which we saw. Even then,
some years before our “renowned sires” with their “peerless
dames” stepped on Plymouth Rock, he wrote, “Newfoundland doth
yearly freight neir eight hundred sail of ships with a silly, lean, skinny,
poor-john, and cor fish,” though all their supplies must be annually
transported from Europe. Why not plant a colony here then, and raise those
supplies on the spot? “Of all the four parts of the world,” says
he, “that I have yet seen, not inhabited, could I have but means to
transport a colony, I would rather live here than anywhere. And if it did not
maintain itself, were we but once indifferently well fitted, let us
starve.” Then “fishing before your doors,” you “may
every night sleep quietly ashore, with good cheer and what fires you will, or,
when you please, with your wives and family.” Already he anticipates
“the new towns in New England in memory of their old,”—and
who knows what may be discovered in the “heart and entrails” of the
land, “seeing even the very edges,” etc., etc.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus26"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/towing.jpg" width-obs="276" height-obs="450" alt="Towing along shore" title="" /> <p class="caption">Towing along shore</p> </div>
<p>All this has been accomplished, and more, and where is Holland now? Verily the
Dutch have taken it. There was no long interval between the suggestion of Smith
and the eulogy of Burke.</p>
<p>Still one after another the mackerel schooners hove in sight round the head of
the Cape, “whitening all the sea road,” and we watched each one for
a moment with an undivided interest. It seemed a pretty sport. Here in the
country it is only a few idle boys or loafers that go a-fishing on a rainy day;
but there it appeared as if every able-bodied man and helpful boy in the Bay
had gone out on a pleasure excursion in their yachts, and all would at last
land and have a chowder on the Cape. The gazetteer tells you gravely how many
of the men and boys of these towns are engaged in the whale, cod, and mackerel
fishery, how many go to the banks of Newfoundland, or the coast of Labrador,
the Straits of Belle Isle or the Bay of Chaleurs (Shalore the sailors call it);
as if I were to reckon up the number of boys in Concord who are engaged during
the summer in the perch, pickerel, bream, hornpout, and shiner fishery, of
which no one keeps the statistics,—though I think that it is pursued with
as much profit to the moral and intellectual man (or boy), and certainly with
less danger to the physical one.</p>
<p>One of my playmates, who was apprenticed to a printer, and was somewhat of a
wag, asked his master one afternoon if he might go a-fishing, and his master
consented. He was gone three months. When he came back, he said that he had
been to the Grand Banks, and went to setting type again as if only an afternoon
had intervened.</p>
<p>I confess I was surprised to find that so many men spent their whole day, ay,
their whole lives almost, a-fishing. It is remarkable what a serious business
men make of getting their dinners, and how universally shiftlessness and a
grovelling taste take refuge in a merely ant-like industry. Better go without
your dinner, I thought, than be thus everlastingly fishing for it like a
cormorant. Of course, <i>viewed from the shore</i>, our pursuits in the country
appear not a whit less frivolous.</p>
<p>I once sailed three miles on a mackerel cruise myself. It was a Sunday evening
after a very warm day in which there had been frequent thunder-showers, and I
had walked along the shore from Cohasset to Duxbury. I wished to get over from
the last place to Clark’s Island, but no boat could stir, they said, at
that stage of the tide, they being left high on the mud. At length I learned
that the tavern-keeper, Winsor, was going out mackerelling with seven men that
evening, and would take me. When there had been due delay, we one after another
straggled down to the shore in a leisurely manner, as if waiting for the tide
still, and in India-rubber boots, or carrying our shoes in our hands, waded to
the boats, each of the crew bearing an armful of wood, and one a bucket of new
potatoes besides. Then they resolved that each should bring one more armful of
wood, and that would be enough. They had already got a barrel of water, and had
some more in the schooner. We shoved the boats a dozen rods over the mud and
water till they floated, then rowing half a mile to the vessel climbed aboard,
and there we were in a mackerel schooner, a fine stout vessel of forty-three
tons, whose name I forget. The baits were not dry on the hooks. There was the
mill in which they ground the mackerel, and the trough to hold it, and the
long-handled dipper to cast it overboard with; and already in the harbor we saw
the surface rippled with schools of small mackerel, the real <i>Scomber
vernalis</i>. The crew proceeded leisurely to weigh anchor and raise their two
sails, there being a fair but very slight wind;—and the sun now setting
clear and shining on the vessel after the thundershowers, I thought that I
could not have commenced the voyage under more favorable auspices. They had
four dories and commonly fished in them, else they fished on the starboard side
aft where their fines hung ready, two to a man. The boom swung round once or
twice, and Winsor cast overboard the foul juice of mackerel mixed with
rain-water which remained in his trough, and then we gathered about the
helmsman and told stories. I remember that the compass was affected by iron in
its neighborhood and varied a few degrees. There was one among us just returned
from California, who was now going as passenger for his health and amusement.
They expected to be gone about a week, to begin fishing the next morning, and
to carry their fish fresh to Boston. They landed me at Clark’s Island,
where the Pilgrims landed, for my companions wished to get some milk for the
voyage. But I had seen the whole of it. The rest was only going to sea and
catching the mackerel. Moreover, it was as well that I did not remain with
them, considering the small quantity of supplies they had taken.</p>
<p>Now I saw the mackerel fleet <i>on its fishing-ground</i>, though I was not at
first aware of it. So my experience was complete.</p>
<p>It was even more cold and windy to-day than before, and we were frequently glad
to take shelter behind a sand-hill. None of the elements were resting. On the
beach there is a ceaseless activity, always something going on, in storm and in
calm, winter and summer, night and day. Even the sedentary man here enjoys a
breadth of view which is almost equivalent to motion. In clear weather the
laziest may look across the Bay as far as Plymouth at a glance, or over the
Atlantic as far as human vision reaches, merely raising his eyelids; or if he
is too lazy to look after all, he can hardly help hearing the ceaseless dash
and roar of the breakers. The restless ocean may at any moment cast up a whale
or a wrecked vessel at your feet. All the reporters in the world, the most
rapid stenographers, could not report the news it brings. No creature could
move slowly where there was so much life around. The few wreckers were either
going or coming, and the ships and the sand-pipers, and the screaming gulls
overhead; nothing stood still but the shore. The little beach-birds trotted
past close to the water’s edge, or paused but an instant to swallow their
food, keeping time with the elements. I wondered how they ever got used to the
sea, that they ventured so near the waves. Such tiny inhabitants the land
brought forth! except one fox. And what could a fox do, looking on the Atlantic
from that high bank? What is the sea to a fox? Sometimes we met a wrecker with
his cart and dog,—and his dog’s faint bark at us wayfarers, heard
through the roaring of the surf, sounded ridiculously faint. To see a little
trembling dainty-footed cur stand on the margin of the ocean, and ineffectually
bark at a beach-bird, amid the roar of the Atlantic! Come with design to bark
at a whale, perchance! That sound will do for farmyards. All the dogs looked
out of place there, naked and as if shuddering at the vastness; and I thought
that they would not have been there had it not been for the countenance of
their masters. Still less could you think of a cat bending her steps that way,
and shaking her wet foot over the Atlantic; yet even this happens sometimes,
they tell me. In summer I saw the tender young of the Piping Plover, like
chickens just hatched, mere pinches of down on two legs, running in troops,
with a faint peep, along the edge of the waves. I used to see packs of
half-wild dogs haunting the lonely beach on the south shore of Staten Island,
in New York Bay, for the sake of the carrion there cast up; and I remember that
once, when for a long time I had heard a furious barking in the tall grass of
the marsh, a pack of half a dozen large dogs burst forth on to the beach,
pursuing a little one which ran straight to me for protection, and I afforded
it with some stones, though at some risk to myself; but the next day the little
one was the first to bark at me. under these circumstances I could not but
remember the words of the poet:—</p>
<p class="poem">
“Blow, blow, thou winter wind,<br/>
Thou art not so unkind<br/>
As <i>his</i> ingratitude;<br/>
Thy tooth is not so keen,<br/>
Because thou art not seen,<br/>
Although thy breath be rude.<br/>
<br/>
“Freeze, freeze, thou bitter sky,<br/>
Thou dost not bite so nigh<br/>
As benefits forgot;<br/>
Though thou the waters warp,<br/>
Thy sting is not so sharp<br/>
As friend remembered not.”</p>
<p>Sometimes, when I was approaching the carcass of a horse or ox which lay on the
beach there, where there was no living creature in sight, a dog would
unexpectedly emerge from it and slink away with a mouthful of offal.</p>
<p>The sea-shore is a sort of neutral ground, a most advantageous point from which
to contemplate this world. It is even a trivial place. The waves forever
rolling to the land are too far-travelled and untamable to be familiar.
Creeping along the endless beach amid the sun-squall and the foam, it occurs to
us that we, too, are the product of sea-slime.</p>
<p>It is a wild, rank place, and there is no flattery in it. Strewn with crabs,
horse-shoes, and razor-clams, and whatever the sea casts up,—a vast
<i>morgue</i>, where famished dogs may range in packs, and crows come daily to
glean the pittance which the tide leaves them. The carcasses of men and beasts
together lie stately up upon its shelf, rotting and bleaching in the sun and
waves, and each tide turns them in their beds, and tucks fresh sand under them.
There is naked Nature, inhumanly sincere, wasting no thought on man, nibbling
at the cliffy shore where gulls wheel amid the spray.</p>
<p>We saw this forenoon what, at a distance, looked like a bleached log with a
branch still left on it. It proved to be one of the principal bones of a whale,
whose carcass, having been stripped of blubber at sea and cut adrift, had been
washed up some months before. It chanced that this was the most conclusive
evidence which we met with to prove, what the Copenhagen antiquaries assert,
that these shores were the <i>Furdustrandas</i> which Thorhall, the companion
of Thorfinn during his expedition to Vinland in 1007. sailed past in disgust.
It appears that after they had left the Cape and explored the country about
Straum-Fiordr (Buzzards’ Bay!), Thorhall, who was disappointed at not
getting any wine to drink there, determined to sail north again in search of
Vinland. Though the antiquaries have given us the original Icelandic. I prefer
to quote their translation, since theirs is the only Latin which I know to have
been aimed at Cape Cod.</p>
<p class="poem">
“Cum parati erant, sublato<br/>
velo, cecinit Thorhallus:<br/>
Eò redeamus, ubi conterranei<br/>
sunt nostri! faciamus aliter,<br/>
expansi arenosi peritum,<br/>
lata navis explorare curricula:<br/>
dum procellam incitantes gladii<br/>
moræ impatientes, qui terram<br/>
collaudant, Furdustrandas<br/>
inhabitant et coquunt balænas.”</p>
<p>In other words: “When they were ready and their sail hoisted, Thorhall
sang: Let us return thither where our fellow-countrymen are. Let us make a
bird<SPAN href="#linknote-6" name="linknoteref-6"><sup>[1]</sup></SPAN> skilful to
fly through the heaven of sand,<SPAN href="#linknote-7"
name="linknoteref-7"><sup>[2]</sup></SPAN> to explore the broad track of ships;
while warriors who impel to the tempest of swords,<SPAN href="#linknote-8"
name="linknoteref-8"><sup>[3]</sup></SPAN> who praise the land, inhabit
Wonder-Strands, <i>and cook whales</i>.’” And so he sailed north
past Cape Cod, as the antiquaries say, “and was shipwrecked on to
Ireland.”</p>
<p>Though once there were more whales cast up here, I think that it was never more
wild than now. We do not associate the idea of antiquity with the ocean, nor
wonder how it looked a thousand years ago, as we do of the land, for it was
equally wild and unfathomable always. The Indians have left no traces on its
surface, but it is the same to the civilized man and the savage. The aspect of
the shore only has changed. The ocean is a wilderness reaching round the globe,
wilder than a Bengal jungle, and fuller of monsters, washing the very wharves
of our cities and the gardens of our sea-side residences. Serpents, bears,
hyenas, tigers, rapidly vanish as civilization advances, but the most populous
and civilized city cannot scare a shark far from its wharves. It is no further
advanced than Singapore, with its tigers, in this respect. The Boston papers
had never told me that there were seals in the harbor. I had always associated
these with the Esquimaux and other outlandish people. Yet from the parlor
windows all along the coast you may see families of them sporting on the flats.
They were as strange to me as the merman would be. Ladies who never walk in the
woods, sail over the sea. To go to sea! Why, it is to have the experience of
Noah,—to realize the deluge. Every vessel is an ark.</p>
<p>We saw no fences as we walked the beach, no birchen <i>riders</i>, highest of
rails, projecting into the sea to keep the cows from wading round, nothing to
remind us that man was proprietor of the shore. Yet a Truro man did tell us
that owners of land on the east side of that town were regarded as owning the
beach, in order that they might have the control of it so far as to defend
themselves against the encroachments of the sand and the beach-grass,—for
even this friend is sometimes regarded as a foe; but he said that this was not
the case on the Bay side. Also I have seen in sheltered parts of the Bay
temporary fences running to low-water mark, the posts being set in sills or
sleepers placed transversely.</p>
<p>After we had been walking many hours, the mackerel fleet still hovered in the
northern horizon nearly in the same direction, but farther off, hull down.
Though their sails were set they never sailed away, nor yet came to anchor, but
stood on various tacks as close together as vessels in a haven, and we in our
ignorance thought that they were contending patiently with adverse winds,
beating eastward; but we learned afterward that they were even then on their
fishing-ground, and that they caught mackerel without taking in their mainsails
or coming to anchor, “a smart breeze” (thence called a mackerel
breeze) “being,” as one says, “considered most
favorable” for this purpose. We counted about two hundred sail of
mackerel fishers within one small arc of the horizon, and a nearly equal number
had disappeared southward. Thus they hovered about the extremity of the Cape,
like moths round a candle; the lights at Race Point and Long Point being bright
candles for them at night,—and at this distance they looked fair and
white, as if they had not yet flown into the light, but nearer at hand
afterward, we saw how some had formerly singed their wings and bodies.</p>
<p>A village seems thus, where its able-bodied men are all ploughing the ocean
together, as a common field. In North Truro the women and girls may sit at
their doors, and see where their husbands and brothers are harvesting their
mackerel fifteen or twenty miles off, on the sea, with hundreds of white
harvest wagons, just as in the country the farmers’ wives sometimes see
their husbands working in a distant hillside field. But the sound of no
dinner-horn can reach the fisher’s ear.</p>
<p>Having passed the narrowest part of the waist of the Cape, though still in
Truro, for this township is about twelve miles long on the shore, we crossed
over to the Bay side, not half a mile distant, in order to spend the noon on
the nearest shrubby sand-hill in Provincetown, called Mount Ararat, which rises
one hundred feet above the ocean. On our way thither we had occasion to admire
the various beautiful forms and colors of the sand, and we noticed an
interesting mirage, which I have since found that Hitchcock also observed on
the sands of the Cape. We were crossing a shallow valley in the Desert, where
the smooth and spotless sand sloped upward by a small angle to the horizon on
every side, and at the lowest part was a long chain of clear but shallow pools.
As we were approaching these for a drink in a diagonal direction across the
valley, they appeared inclined at a slight but decided angle to the horizon,
though they were plainly and broadly connected with one another, and there was
not the least ripple to suggest a current; so that by the time we had reached a
convenient part of one we seemed to have ascended several feet. They appeared
to lie by magic on the side of the vale, like a mirror left in a slanting
position. It was a very pretty mirage for a Provincetown desert, but not
amounting to what, in Sanscrit, is called “the thirst of the
gazelle,” as there was real water here for a base, and we were able to
quench our thirst after all.</p>
<p>Professor Rafn, of Copenhagen, thinks that the mirage which I noticed, but
which an old inhabitant of Provincetown, to whom I mentioned it, had never seen
nor heard of, had something to do with the name “Furdustrandas,”
i.e. Wonder-Strands, given, as I have said, in the old Icelandic account of
Thorfinn’s expedition to Vinland in the year 1007, to a part of the coast
on which he landed. But these sands are more remarkable for their length than
for their mirage, which is common to all deserts, and the reason for the name
which the Northmen them-selves give,—“because it took a long time
to sail by them,”—is sufficient and more applicable to these
shores. However, if you should sail all the way from Greenland to
Buzzards’ Bay along the coast, you would get sight of a good many sandy
beaches. But whether Thorfinn saw the mirage here or not, Thor-eau, one of the
same family, did; and perchance it was because Lief the Lucky had, in a
previous voyage, taken Thor-er and his people off the rock in the middle of the
sea, that Thor-eau was born to see it.</p>
<p>This was not the only mirage which I saw on the Cape. That half of the beach
next the bank is commonly level, or nearly so, while the other slopes downward
to the water. As I was walking upon the edge of the bank in Wellfleet at
sundown, it seemed to me that the inside half of the beach sloped upward toward
the water to meet the other, forming a ridge ten or twelve feet high the whole
length of the shore, but higher always opposite to where I stood; and I was not
convinced of the contrary till I descended the bank, though the shaded outlines
left by the waves of a previous tide but half-way down the apparent declivity
might have taught me better. A stranger may easily detect what is strange to
the oldest inhabitant, for the strange is his province. The old oysterman,
speaking of gull-shooting, had said that you must aim under, when firing down
the bank.</p>
<p>A neighbor tells me that one August, looking through a glass from Naushon to
some vessels which were sailing along near Martha’s Vineyard, the water
about them appeared perfectly smooth, so that they were reflected in it, and
yet their full sails proved that it must be rippled, and they who were with him
thought that it was mirage, <i>i.e.</i> a reflection from a haze.</p>
<p>From the above-mentioned sand-hill we over-looked Provincetown and its harbor,
now emptied of vessels, and also a wide expanse of ocean. As we did not wish to
enter Provincetown before night, though it was cold and windy, we returned
across the Deserts to the Atlantic side, and walked along the beach again
nearly to Race Point, being still greedy of the sea influence. All the while it
was not so calm as the reader may suppose, but it was blow, blow,
blow,—roar, roar, roar,—tramp, tramp, tramp,—without
interruption. The shore now trended nearly east and west.</p>
<p>Before sunset, having already seen the mackerel fleet returning into the Bay,
we left the sea-shore on the north of Provincetown, and made our way across the
Desert to the eastern extremity of the town. From the first high sand-hill,
covered with beach-grass and bushes to its top, on the edge of the desert, we
overlooked the shrubby hill and swamp country which surrounds Provincetown on
the north, and protects it, in some measure, from the invading sand.
Notwithstanding the universal barrenness, and the contiguity of the desert, I
never saw an autumnal landscape so beautifully painted as this was. It was like
the richest rug imaginable spread over an uneven surface; no damask nor velvet,
nor Tyrian dye or stuffs, nor the work of any loom, could ever match it. There
was the incredibly bright red of the Huckleberry, and the reddish brown of the
Bayberry, mingled with the bright and living green of small Pitch-Pines, and
also the duller green of the Bayberry, Boxberry, and Plum, the yellowish green
of the Shrub-oaks, and the various golden and yellow and fawn-colored tints of
the Birch and Maple and Aspen,—each making its own figure, and, in the
midst, the few yellow sand-slides on the sides of the hills looked like the
white floor seen through rents in the rug. Coming from the country as I did,
and many autumnal woods as I had seen, this was perhaps the most novel and
remarkable sight that I saw on the Cape. Probably the brightness of the tints
was enhanced by contrast with the sand which surrounded this tract. This was a
part of the furniture of Cape Cod. We had for days walked up the long and bleak
piazza which runs along her Atlantic side, then over the sanded floor of her
halls, and now we were being introduced into her boudoir. The hundred white
sails crowding round Long Point into Provincetown Harbor, seen over the painted
hills in front, looked like toy ships upon a mantel-piece.</p>
<p>The peculiarity of this autumnal landscape consisted in the lowness and
thickness of the shrubbery, no less than in the brightness of the tints. It was
like a thick stuff of worsted or a fleece, and looked as if a giant could take
it up by the hem, or rather the tasselled fringe which trailed out on the sand,
and shake it, though it needed not to be shaken. But no doubt the dust would
fly in that case, for not a little has accumulated underneath it. Was it not
such an autumnal landscape as this which suggested our high-colored rugs and
carpets? Hereafter when I look on a richer rug than usual, and study its
figures, I shall think, there are the huckleberry hills, and there the denser
swamps of boxberry and blueberry: there the shrub-oak patches and the
bayberries, there the maples and the birches and the pines. What other dyes are
to be compared to these? They were warmer colors than I had associated with the
New England coast.</p>
<p>After threading a swamp full of boxberry, and climbing several hills covered
with shrub-oaks, without a path, where shipwrecked men would be in danger of
perishing in the night, we came down upon the eastern extremity of the four
planks which run the whole length of Provincetown street. This, which is the
last town on the Cape, lies mainly in one street along the curving beach
fronting the southeast. The sand-hills, covered with shrubbery and interposed
with swamps and ponds, rose immediately behind it in the form of a crescent,
which is from half a mile to a mile or more wide in the middle, and beyond
these is the desert, which is the greater part of its territory, stretching to
the sea on the east and west and north. The town is compactly built in the
narrow space, from ten to fifty rods deep, between the harbor and the
sand-hills, and contained at that time about twenty-six hundred inhabitants.
The houses, in which a more modern and pretending style has at length prevailed
over the fisherman’s hut, stand on the inner or plank side of the street,
and the fish and store houses, with the picturesque-looking windmills of the
Salt-works, on the water side. The narrow portion of the beach between, forming
the street, about eighteen feet wide, the only one where one carriage could
pass another, if there was more than one carriage in the town, looked much
“heavier” than any portion of the beach or the desert which we had
walked on, it being above the reach of the highest tide, and the sand being
kept loose by the occasional passage of a traveller. We learned that the four
planks on which we were walking had been bought by the town’s share of
the Surplus Revenue, the disposition of which was a bone of contention between
the inhabitants, till they wisely resolved thus to put it under foot. Yet some,
it was said, were so provoked because they did not receive their particular
share in money, that they persisted in walking in the sand a long time after
the sidewalk was built. This is the only instance which I happen to know in
which the surplus revenue proved a blessing to any town. A surplus revenue of
dollars from the treasury to stem the greater evil of a surplus revenue of sand
from the ocean. They expected to make a hard road by the time these planks were
worn out. Indeed, they have already done so since we were there, and have
almost forgotten their sandy baptism.</p>
<p>As we passed along we observed the inhabitants engaged in curing either fish or
the coarse salt hay which they had brought home and spread on the beach before
their doors, looking as yellow as if they had raked it out of the sea. The
front-yard plots appeared like what indeed they were, portions of the beach
fenced in, with Beach-grass growing in them, as if they were sometimes covered
by the tide. You might still pick up shells and pebbles there. There were a few
trees among the houses, especially silver abeles, willows, and balm-of-Gileads;
and one man showed me a young oak which he had transplanted from behind the
town, thinking it an apple-tree. But every man to his trade. Though he had
little woodcraft, he was not the less weatherwise, and gave us one piece of
information; viz., he had observed that when a thunder-cloud came up with a
flood-tide it did not rain. This was the most completely maritime town that we
were ever in. It was merely a good harbor, surrounded by land dry, if not
firm,—an inhabited beach, whereon fishermen cured and stored their fish,
without any back country. When ashore the inhabitants still walk on planks. A
few small patches have been reclaimed from the swamps, containing commonly half
a dozen square rods only each. We saw one which was fenced with four lengths of
rail; also a fence made wholly of hogshead-staves stuck in the ground. These,
and such as these, were all the cultivated and cultivable land in Provincetown.
We were told that there were thirty or forty acres in all, but we did not
discover a quarter part so much, and that was well dusted with sand, and looked
as if the desert was claiming it. They are now turning some of their swamps
into Cranberry Meadows on quite an extensive scale.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus27"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/cranberry.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="331" alt="A cranberry meadow" title="" /> <p class="caption">A cranberry meadow</p> </div>
<p>Yet far from being out of the way. Provincetown is directly in the way of the
navigator, and he is lucky who does not run afoul of it in the dark. It is
situated on one of the highways of commerce, and men from all parts of the
globe touch there in the course of a year.</p>
<p>The mackerel fleet had nearly all got in before us, it being Saturday night,
excepting that division which had stood down towards Chatham in the morning;
and from a hill where we went to see the sun set in the Bay we counted two
hundred goodly looking schooners at anchor in the harbor at various distances
from the shore, and more were yet coming round the Cape. As each came to
anchor, it took in sail and swung round in the wind, and lowered its boat. They
belonged chiefly to Wellfleet, Truro, and Cape Ann. This was that city of
canvas which we had seen hull down in the horizon. Near at hand, and under bare
poles, they were unexpectedly black-looking vessels,
μέλαιναι νῆες.
A fisherman told us that there were fifteen hundred vessels in the
mackerel fleet, and that he had counted three hundred and fifty in Provincetown
Harbor at one time. Being obliged to anchor at a considerable distance from the
shore on account of the shallowness of the water, they made the impression of a
larger fleet than the vessels at the wharves of a large city. As they had been
manœuvring out there all day seemingly for our entertainment, while we were
walking north-westward along the Atlantic, so now we found them flocking into
Provincetown Harbor at night, just as we arrived, as if to meet us, and exhibit
themselves close at hand. Standing by Race Point and Long Point with various
speed, they reminded me of fowls coming home to roost.</p>
<p>These were genuine New England vessels. It is stated in the Journal of Moses
Prince, a brother of the annalist, under date of 1721, at which time he visited
Gloucester, that the first vessel of the class called schooner was built at
Gloucester about eight years before, by Andrew Robinson; and late in the same
century one Cotton Tufts gives us the tradition with some particulars, which he
learned on a visit to the same place. According to the latter, Robinson having
constructed a vessel which he masted and rigged in a peculiar manner, on her
going off the stocks a bystander cried out, “<i>O, how she
scoons!</i>” whereat Robinson replied, “<i>A schooner let her
be!</i>” “From which time,” says Tufts, “vessels thus
masted and rigged have gone by the name of schooners; before which, vessels of
this description were not known in Europe.” (See Mass. Hist. Coll., Vol.
IX., 1st Series, and Vol. I., 4th Series.) Yet I can hardly believe this, for a
schooner has always seemed to me—the typical vessel.</p>
<p>According to C. E. Potter of Manchester, New Hampshire, the very word
<i>schooner</i> is of New England origin, being from the Indian <i>schoon</i>
or <i>scoot</i>, meaning to rush, as Schoodic, from <i>scoot</i> and
<i>anke</i>, a place where water rushes. N. B. Somebody of Gloucester was to
read a paper on this matter before a genealogical society, in Boston, March 3,
1859, according to the <i>Boston Journal</i>, q. v.</p>
<p>Nearly all who come out must walk on the four planks which I have mentioned, so
that you are pretty sure to meet all the inhabitants of Provincetown who come
out in the course of a day, provided you keep out yourself. This evening the
planks were crowded with mackerel fishers, to whom we gave and from whom we
took the wall, as we returned to our hotel. This hotel was kept by a tailor,
his shop on the one side of the door, his hotel on the other, and his day
seemed to be divided between carving meat and carving broadcloth.</p>
<p>The next morning, though it was still more cold and blustering than the day
before, we took to the Deserts again, for we spent our days wholly out of
doors, in the sun when there was any, and in the wind which never failed. After
threading the shrubby hill country at the southwest end of the town, west of
the Shank-Painter Swamp, whose expressive name—for we understood it at
first as a landsman naturally would—gave it importance in our eyes, we
crossed the sands to the shore south of Race Point and three miles distant, and
thence roamed round eastward through the desert to where we had left the sea
the evening before. We travelled five or six miles after we got out there, on a
curving line, and might have gone nine or ten, over vast platters of pure sand,
from the midst of which we could not see a particle of vegetation, excepting
the distant thin fields of Beach-grass, which crowned and made the ridges
toward which the sand sloped upward on each side;—all the while in the
face of a cutting wind as cold as January; indeed, we experienced no weather so
cold as this for nearly two months afterward. This desert extends from the
extremity of the Cape, through Provincetown into Truro, and many a time as we
were traversing it we were reminded of “Riley’s Narrative” of
his captivity in the sands of Arabia, notwithstanding the cold. Our eyes
magnified the patches of Beach-grass into cornfields in the horizon, and we
probably exaggerated the height of the ridges on account of the mirage. I was
pleased to learn afterward, from Kalm’s Travels in North America, that
the inhabitants of the Lower St. Lawrence call this grass (<i>Calamagrostis
arenaria</i>), and also Sea-lyme grass (<i>Elymus arenarius</i>), <i>seigle de
me</i>; and he adds, “I have been assured that these plants grow in great
plenty in Newfoundland, and on other North American shores; the places covered
with them looking, at a distance, like cornfields; which might explain the
passage in our northern accounts [he wrote in 1749] of the excellent wine land
[<i>Vinland det goda</i>, Translator], which mentions that they had found whole
fields of wheat growing wild.”</p>
<p>The Beach-grass is “two to four feet high, of a seagreen color,”
and it is said to be widely diffused over the world. In the Hebrides it is used
for mats, pack-saddles, bags, hats, etc.; paper has been made of it at
Dorchester in this State, and cattle eat it when tender. It has heads somewhat
like rye, from six inches to a foot in length, and it is propagated both by
roots and seeds. To express its love for sand, some botanists have called it
<i>Psamma arenaria</i>, which is the Greek for sand, qualified by the Latin for
sandy,—or sandy sand. As it is blown about by the wind, while it is held
fast by its roots, it describes myriad circles in the sand as accurately as if
they were made by compasses.</p>
<p>It was the dreariest scenery imaginable. The only animals which we saw on the
sand at that time were spiders, which are to be found almost everywhere whether
on snow or ice-water or sand,—and a venomous-looking, long, narrow worm,
one of the myriapods, or thousand-legs. We were surprised to see spider-holes
in that flowing sand with an edge as firm as that of a stoned well.</p>
<p>In June this sand was scored with the tracks of turtles both large and small,
which had been out in the night, leading to and from the swamps. I was told by
a <i>terræ filius</i> who has a “farm” on the edge of the desert,
and is familiar with the fame of Provincetown, that one man had caught
twenty-five snapping-turtles there the previous spring. His own method of
catching them was to put a toad on a mackerel-hook and cast it into a pond,
tying the line to a stump or stake on shore. Invariably the turtle when hooked
crawled up the line to the stump, and was found waiting there by his captor,
however long afterward. He also said that minks, muskrats, foxes, coons, and
wild mice were found there, but no squirrels. We heard of sea-turtle as large
as a barrel being found on the beach and on East Harbor marsh, but whether they
were native there, or had been lost out of some vessel, did not appear. Perhaps
they were the Salt-water Terrapin, or else the Smooth Terrapin, found thus far
north. Many toads were met with where there was nothing but sand and
beach-grass. In Truro I had been surprised at the number of large light-colored
toads everywhere hopping over the dry and sandy fields, their color
corresponding to that of the sand. Snakes also are common on these pure sand
beaches, and I have never been so much troubled by mosquitoes as in such
localities. At the same season strawberries grew there abundantly in the little
hollows on the edge of the desert standing amid the beach-grass in the sand,
and the fruit of the shadbush or Amelanchier, which the inhabitants call
Josh-pears (some think from juicy?), is very abundant on the hills. I fell in
with an obliging man who conducted me to the best locality for strawberries. He
said that he would not have shown me the place if he had not seen that I was a
stranger, and could not anticipate him another year; I therefore feel bound in
honor not to reveal it. When we came to a pond, he being the native did the
honors and carried me over on his shoulders, like Sindbad. One good turn
deserves another, and if he ever comes our way I will do as much for him.</p>
<p>In one place we saw numerous dead tops of trees projecting through the
otherwise uninterrupted desert, where, as we afterward learned, thirty or forty
years before a flourishing forest had stood, and now, as the trees were laid
bare from year to year, the inhabitants cut off their tops for fuel.</p>
<p>We saw nobody that day outside of the town; it was too wintry for such as had
seen the Backside before, or for the greater number who never desire to see it,
to venture out; and we saw hardly a track to show that any had ever crossed
this desert. Yet I was told that some are always out on the Back-side night and
day in severe weather, looking for wrecks, in order that they may get the job
of discharging the cargo, or the like,—and thus shipwrecked men are
succored. But, generally speaking, the inhabitants rarely visit these sands.
One who had lived in Provincetown thirty years told me that he had not been
through to the north side within that time. Sometimes the natives themselves
come near perishing by losing their way in snow-storms behind the town.</p>
<p>The wind was not a Sirocco or Simoon, such as we associate with the desert, but
a New England northeaster,—and we sought shelter in vain under the
sand-hills, for it blew all about them, rounding them into cones, and was sure
to find us out on whichever side we sat. From time to time we lay down and
drank at little pools in the sand, filled with pure fresh water, all that was
left, probably, of a pond or swamp. The air was filled with dust like snow, and
cutting sand which made the face tingle, and we saw what it must be to face it
when the weather was drier, and, if possible, windier still,—to face a
migrating sand-bar in the air, which has picked up its duds and is
off,—to be whipped with a cat, not o’ nine-tails, but of a myriad
of tails, and each one a sting to it. A Mr. Whitman, a former minister of
Wellfleet, used to write to his inland friends that the blowing sand scratched
the windows so that he was obliged to have one new pane set every week, that he
might see out.</p>
<p>On the edge of the shrubby woods the sand had the appearance of an inundation
which was overwhelming them, terminating in an abrupt bank many feet higher
than the surface on which they stood, and having partially buried the out-side
trees. The moving sand-hills of England, called Dunes or Downs, to which these
have been likened, are either formed of sand cast up by the sea, or of sand
taken from the land itself in the first place by the wind, and driven still
farther inward. It is here a tide of sand impelled by waves and wind, slowly
flowing from the sea toward the town. The northeast winds are said to be the
strongest, but the northwest to move most sand, because they are the driest. On
the shore of the Bay of Biscay many villages were formerly destroyed in this
way. Some of the ridges of beach-grass which we saw were planted by government
many years ago, to preserve the harbor of Provincetown and the extremity of the
Cape. I talked with some who had been employed in the planting. In the
“Description of the Eastern Coast,” which I have already referred
to, it is said: “Beach-grass during the spring and summer grows about two
feet and a half. If surrounded by naked beach, the storms of autumn and winter
heap up the sand on all sides, and cause it to rise nearly to the top of the
plant. In the ensuing spring the grass mounts anew; is again covered with sand
in the winter; and thus a hill or ridge continues to ascend as long as there is
a sufficient base to support it, or till the circumscribing sand, being also
covered with beach-grass, will no longer yield to the force of the
winds.” Sand-hills formed in this way are sometimes one hundred feet high
and of every variety of form, like snow-drifts, or Arab tents, and are
continually shifting. The grass roots itself very firmly. When I endeavored to
pull it up, it usually broke off ten inches or a foot below the surface, at
what had been the surface the year before, as appeared by the numerous
offshoots there, it being a straight, hard, round shoot, showing by its length
how much the sand had accumulated the last year; and sometimes the dead stubs
of a previous season were pulled up with it from still deeper in the sand, with
their own more decayed shoot attached,—so that the age of a sand-hill,
and its rate of increase for several years, is pretty accurately recorded in
this way.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus28"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/sanddunes.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="332" alt="The sand dunes drifting in upon the trees" title="" /> <p class="caption">The sand dunes drifting in upon the trees</p> </div>
<p>Old Gerard, the English herbalist, says, p. 1250: “I find mention in
Stowe’s Chronicle, in Anno 1555, of a certain pulse or pease, as they
term it, wherewith the poor people at that time, there being a great dearth,
were miraculously helped: he thus mentions it. In the month of August (saith
he), in Suffolke, at a place by the sea side all of hard stone and pibble,
called in those parts a shelf, lying between the towns of Orford and
Aldborough, where neither grew grass nor any earth was ever seen; it chanced in
this barren place suddenly to spring up without any tillage or sowing, great
abundance of peason, whereof the poor gathered (as men judged) above one
hundred quarters, yet remained some ripe and some blossoming, as many as ever
there were before: to the which place rode the Bishop of Norwich and the Lord
Willoughby, with others in great number, who found nothing but hard, rocky
stone the space of three yards under the roots of these peason, which roots
were great and long, and very sweet.” He tells us also that Gesner
learned from Dr. Cajus that there were enough there to supply thousands of men.
He goes on to say that “they without doubt grew there many years before,
but were not observed till hunger made them take notice of them, and quickened
their invention, which commonly in our people is very dull, especially in
finding out food of this nature. My worshipful friend Dr. Argent hath told me
that many years ago he was in this place, and caused his man to pull among the
beach with his hands, and follow the roots so long until he got some equal in
length unto his height, yet could come to no ends of them.” Gerard never
saw them, and is not certain what kind they were.</p>
<p>In Dwight’s Travels in New England it is stated that the inhabitants of
Truro were formerly regularly warned under the authority of law in the month of
April yearly, to plant beachgrass, as elsewhere they are warned to repair the
highways. They dug up the grass in bunches, which were afterward divided into
several smaller ones, and set about three feet apart, in rows, so arranged as
to break joints and obstruct the passage of the wind. It spread itself rapidly,
the weight of the seeds when ripe bending the heads of the grass, and so
dropping directly by its side and vegetating there. In this way, for instance,
they built up again that part of the Cape between Truro and Provincetown where
the sea broke over in the last century. They have now a public road near there,
made by laying sods, which were full of roots, bottom upward and close together
on the sand, double in the middle of the track, then spreading brush evenly
over the sand on each side for half a dozen feet, planting beachgrass on the
banks in regular rows, as above described, and sticking a fence of brush
against the hollows.</p>
<p>The attention of the general government was first attracted to the danger which
threatened Cape Cod Harbor from the inroads of the sand, about thirty years
ago, and commissioners were at that time appointed by Massachusetts, to examine
the premises. They reported in June, 1825, that, owing to “the trees and
brush having been cut down, and the beach-grass destroyed on the seaward side
of the Cape, opposite the Harbor,” the original surface of the ground had
been broken up and removed by the wind toward the Harbor,—during the
previous fourteen years,—over an extent of “one half a mile in
breadth, and about four and a half miles in length.”—“The
space where a few years since were some of the highest lands on the Cape,
covered with trees and bushes,” presenting “an extensive waste of
undulating sand “;—and that, during the previous twelve months, the
sand “had approached the Harbor an average distance of fifty rods, for an
extent of four and a half miles!” and unless some measures were adopted
to check its progress, it would in a few years destroy both the harbor and the
town. They therefore recommended that beach-grass be set out on a curving line
over a space ten rods wide and four and a half miles long, and that cattle,
horses, and sheep be prohibited from going abroad, and the inhabitants from
cutting the brush.</p>
<p>I was told that about thirty thousand dollars in all had been appropriated to
this object, though it was complained that a great part of this was spent
foolishly, as the public money is wont to be. Some say that while the
government is planting beach-grass behind the town for the protection of the
harbor, the inhabitants are rolling the sand into the harbor in wheelbarrows,
in order to make house-lots. The Patent-Office has recently imported the seed
of this grass from Holland, and distributed it over the country, but probably
we have as much as the Hollanders.</p>
<p>Thus Cape Cod is anchored to the heavens, as it were, by a myriad little cables
of beach-grass, and, if they should fail, would become a total wreck, and
erelong go to the bottom. Formerly, the cows were permitted to go at large, and
they ate many strands of the cable by which the Cape is moored, and well-nigh
set it adrift, as the bull did the boat which was moored with a grass rope; but
now they are not permitted to wander.</p>
<p>A portion of Truro which has considerable taxable property on it has lately
been added to Provincetown, and I was told by a Truro man that his townsmen
talked of petitioning the legislature to set off the next mile of their
territory also to Provincetown, in order that she might have her share of the
lean as well as the fat, and take care of the road through it; for its whole
value is literally to hold the Cape together, and even this it has not always
done. But Provincetown strenuously declines the gift.</p>
<p>The wind blowed so hard from the northeast that, cold as it was, we resolved to
see the breakers on the Atlantic side, whose din we had heard all the morning;
so we kept on eastward through the Desert, till we struck the shore again
northeast of Provincetown, and exposed ourselves to the full force of the
piercing blast. There are extensive shoals there over which the sea broke with
great force. For half a mile from the shore it was one mass of white breakers,
which, with the wind, made such a din that we could hardly hear ourselves
speak. Of this part of the coast it is said: “A northeast storm, the most
violent and fatal to seamen, as it is frequently accompanied with snow, blows
directly on the land: a strong current sets along the shore; add to which that
ships, during the operation of such a storm, endeavor to work northward, that
they may get into the bay. Should they be unable to weather Race Point, the
wind drives them on the shore, and a shipwreck is inevitable. Accordingly, the
strand is everywhere covered with the fragments of vessels.” But since
the Highland Light was erected, this part of the coast is less dangerous, and
it is said that more shipwrecks occur south of that light, where they were
scarcely known before.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus29"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/breakers.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="327" alt="The white breakers on the Atlantic side" title="" /> <p class="caption">The white breakers on the Atlantic side</p> </div>
<p>This was the stormiest sea that we witnessed,—more <i>tumultuous</i>, my
companion affirmed, than the rapids of Niagara, and, of course, on a far
greater scale. It was the ocean in a gale, a clear, cold day, with only one
sail in sight, which labored much, as if it were anxiously seeking a harbor. It
was high tide when we reached the shore, and in one place, for a considerable
distance, each wave dashed up so high that it was difficult to pass between it
and the bank. Further south, where the bank was higher, it would have been
dangerous to attempt it. A native of the Cape has told me that, many years ago,
three boys, his playmates, having gone to this beach in Wellfleet to visit a
wreck, when the sea receded ran down to the wreck, and when it came in ran
before it to the bank, but the sea following fast at their heels, caused the
bank to cave and bury them alive.</p>
<p>It was the roaring sea, θάλασσα
ἠχήεσσα,—</p>
<p class="poem">
ἀμφὶ δὲ τ’
ἄκραι<br/>
Ἠϊόνες
βοόωσιν,
ἐρευγομένης
ἁλὸς ἔξω.</p>
<p class="poem">
And the summits of the bank<br/>
Around resound, the sea being vomited forth.</p>
<p>As we stood looking on this scene we were gradually convinced that fishing here
and in a pond were not, in all respects, the same, and that he who waits for
fair weather and a calm sea may never see the glancing skin of a mackerel, and
get no nearer to a cod than the wooden emblem in the State House.</p>
<p>Having lingered on the shore till we were well-nigh chilled to death by the
wind, and were ready to take shelter in a Charity-house, we turned our
weather-beaten faces toward Provincetown and the Bay again, having now more
than doubled the Cape.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-6" id="linknote-6"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-6">[1]</SPAN>
<i>I. e.</i> a vessel.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-7" id="linknote-7"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-7">[2]</SPAN>
The sea, which is arched over its sandy bottom like a heaven.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-8" id="linknote-8"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-8">[3]</SPAN>
Battle.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap10"></SPAN>X<br/> PROVINCETOWN</h2>
<p>Early the next morning I walked into a fish-house near our hotel, where three
or four men were engaged in trundling out the pickled fish on barrows, and
spreading them to dry. They told me that a vessel had lately come in from the
Banks with forty-four thousand codfish. Timothy Dwight says that, just before
he arrived at Provincetown, “a schooner come in from the Great Bank with
fifty-six thousand fish, almost one thousand five hundred quintals, taken in a
single voyage; the main deck being, on her return, eight inches under water in
calm weather.” The cod in this fish-house, just out of the pickle, lay
packed several feet deep, and three or four men stood on them in cowhide boots,
pitching them on to the barrows with an instrument which had a single iron
point. One young man, who chewed tobacco, spat on the fish repeatedly. Well,
sir, thought I, when that older man sees you he will speak to you. But
presently I saw the older man do the same thing. It reminded me of the figs of
Smyrna. “How long does it take to cure these fish? I asked.</p>
<p>“Two good drying days, sir,” was the answer.</p>
<p>I walked across the street again into the hotel to breakfast, and mine host
inquired if I would take “hashed fish or beans.” I took beans,
though they never were a favorite dish of mine. I found next summer that this
was still the only alternative proposed here, and the landlord was still
ringing the changes on these two words. In the former dish there was a
remarkable proportion of fish. As you travel inland the potato predominates. It
chanced that I did not taste fresh fish of any kind on the Cape, and I was
assured that they were not so much used there as in the country. That is where
they are cured, and where, sometimes, travellers are cured of eating them. No
fresh meat was slaughtered in Provincetown, but the little that was used at the
public houses was brought from Boston by the steamer.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus30"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/ptownharbor.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="317" alt="In Provincetown harbor" title="" /> <p class="caption">In Provincetown harbor</p> </div>
<p>A great many of the houses here were surrounded by fish-flakes close up to the
sills on all sides, with only a narrow passage two or three feet wide, to the
front door; so that instead of looking out into a flower or grass plot, you
looked on to so many square rods of cod turned wrong side outwards. These
parterres were said to be least like a flower-garden in a good drying day in
mid-summer. There were flakes of every age and pattern, and some so rusty and
overgrown with lichens that they looked as if they might have served the
founders of the fishery here. Some had broken down under the weight of
successive harvests. The principal employment of the inhabitants at this time
seemed to be to trundle out their fish and spread them in the morning, and
bring them in at night. I saw how many a loafer who chanced to be out early
enough got a job at wheeling out the fish of his neighbor who was anxious to
improve the whole of a fair day. Now, then, I knew where salt fish were caught.
They were everywhere lying on their backs, their collar-bones standing out like
the lapels of a man-o’-war-man’s jacket, and inviting all things to
come and rest in their bosoms; and all things, with a few exceptions, accepted
the invitation. I think, by the way, that if you should wrap a large salt fish
round a small boy, he would have a coat of such a fashion as I have seen many a
one wear to muster. Salt fish were stacked up on the wharves, looking like
corded wood, maple and yellow birch with the bark left on. I mistook them for
this at first, and such in one sense they were,—fuel to maintain our
vital fires,—an eastern wood which grew on the Grand Banks. Some were
stacked in the form of huge flower-pots, being laid in small circles with the
tails outwards, each circle successively larger than the preceding until the
pile was three or four feet high, when the circles rapidly diminished, so as to
form a conical roof. On the shores of New Brunswick this is covered with
birch-bark, and stones are placed upon it, and being thus rendered impervious
to the rain, it is left to season before being packed for exportation.</p>
<p>It is rumored that in the fall the cows here are sometimes fed on
cod’s-heads! The godlike part of the cod, which, like the human head, is
curiously and wonderfully made, forsooth has but little less brain in
it,—coming to such an end I to be craunched by cows I I felt my own skull
crack from sympathy. What if the heads of men were to be cut off to feed the
cows of a superior order of beings who inhabit the islands in the ether? Away
goes your fine brain, the house of thought and instinct, to swell the cud of a
ruminant animal!—However, an inhabitant assured me that they did not make
a practice of feeding cows on cod’s-heads; the cows merely would eat them
sometimes; but I might live there all my days and never see it done. A cow
wanting salt would also sometimes lick out all the soft part of a cod on the
flakes. This he would have me believe was the foundation of this fish-story.</p>
<p>It has been a constant traveller’s tale and perhaps slander, now for
thousands of years, the Latins and Greeks have repeated it, that this or that
nation feeds its cattle, or horses, or sheep, on fish, as may be seen in Ælian
and Pliny, but in the Journal of Nearchus, who was Alexander’s admiral,
and made a voyage from the Indus to the Euphrates three hundred and twenty-six
years before Christ, it is said that the inhabitants of a portion of the
intermediate coast, whom he called Ichthyophagi or Fish-eaters, not only ate
fishes raw and also dried and pounded in a whale’s vertebra for a mortar
and made into a paste, but gave them to their cattle, there being no grass on
the coast; and several modern travellers—Braybosa, Niebuhr, and
others—make the same report. Therefore in balancing the evidence I am
still in doubt about the Provincetown cows. As for other domestic animals,
Captain King in his continuation of Captain Cook’s Journal in 1779, says
of the dogs of Kamtschatka, “Their food in the winter consists entirely
of the heads, entrail, and backbones of salmon, which are put aside and dried
for that purpose; and with this diet they are fed but sparingly.”
(Cook’s Journal, Vol. VII., p. 315.)</p>
<p>As we are treating of fishy matters, let me insert what Pliny says, that
“the commanders of the fleets of Alexander the Great have related that
the Gedrosi, who dwell on the banks of the river Arabis, are in the habit of
making the doors of their houses with the jaw-bones of fishes, and raftering
the roofs with their bones.” Strabo tells the same of the Ichthyophagi.
“Hardouin remarks that the Basques of his day were in the habit of
fencing their gardens with the ribs of the whale, which sometimes exceeded
twenty feet in length; and Cuvier says that at the present time the jaw-bone of
the whale is used in Norway for the purpose of making beams or posts for
buildings.” (Bohn’s ed., trans, of Pliny, Vol. II., p. 361.)
Herodotus says the inhabitants on Lake Prasias in Thrace (living on piles)
“give fish for fodder to their horses and beasts of burden.”</p>
<p>Provincetown was apparently what is called a flourishing town. Some of the
inhabitants asked me if I did not think that they appeared to be well off
generally. I said that I did, and asked how many there were in the almshouse.
“O, only one or two, infirm or idiotic,” answered they. The outward
aspect of the houses and shops frequently suggested a poverty which their
interior comfort and even richness disproved. You might meet a lady daintily
dressed in the Sabbath morning, wading in among the sandhills, from church,
where there appeared no house fit to receive her, yet no doubt the interior of
the house answered to the exterior of the lady. As for the interior of the
inhabitants I am still in the dark about it. I had a little intercourse with
some whom I met in the street, and was often agreeably disappointed by
discovering the intelligence of rough, and what would be considered unpromising
specimens. Nay, I ventured to call on one citizen the next summer, by special
invitation. I found him sitting in his front doorway, that Sabbath evening,
prepared for me to come in unto him; but unfortunately for his reputation for
keeping open house, there was stretched across his gateway a circular cobweb of
the largest kind and quite entire. This looked so ominous that I actually
turned aside and went in the back way.</p>
<p>This Monday morning was beautifully mild and calm, both on land and water,
promising us a smooth passage across the Bay, and the fishermen feared that it
would not be so good a drying day as the cold and windy one which preceded it.
There could hardly have been a greater contrast. This was the first of the
Indian summer days, though at a late hour in the morning we found the wells in
the sand behind the town still covered with ice, which had formed in the night.
What with wind and sun my most prominent feature fairly cast its slough. But I
assure you it will take more than two good drying days to cure me of rambling.
After making an excursion among the hills in the neighborhood of the
Shank-Painter Swamp, and getting a little work done in its line, we took our
seat upon the highest sand-hill overlooking the town, in mid-air, on a long
plank stretched across between two hillocks of sand, where some boys were
endeavoring in vain to fly their kite; and there we remained the rest of that
forenoon looking out over the placid harbor, and watching for the first
appearance of the steamer from Wellfleet, that we might be in readiness to go
on board when we heard the whistle off Long Point.</p>
<p>We got what we could out of the boys in the meanwhile. Provincetown boys are of
course all sailors and have sailors’ eyes. When we were at the Highland
Light the last summer, seven or eight miles from Provincetown Harbor, and
wished to know one Sunday morning if the <i>Olata</i>, a well-known yacht, had
got in from Boston, so that we could return in her, a Provincetown boy about
ten years old, who chanced to be at the table, remarked that she had. I asked
him how he knew. “I just saw her come in,” said he. When I
expressed surprise that he could distinguish her from other vessels so far, he
said that there were not so many of those two-topsail schooners about but that
he could tell her. Palfrey said, in his oration at Barnstable, the duck does
not take to the water with a surer instinct than the Barnstable boy. [He might
have said the Cape Cod boy as well.] He leaps from his leading-strings into the
shrouds, it is but a bound from the mother’s lap to the masthead. He
boxes the compass in his infant soliloquies. He can hand, reef, and steer by
the time he flies a kite.</p>
<p>This was the very day one would have chosen to sit upon a hill overlooking sea
and land, and muse there. The mackerel fleet was rapidly taking its departure,
one schooner after another, and standing round the Cape, like fowls leaving
their roosts in the morning to disperse themselves in distant fields. The
turtle-like sheds of the salt-works were crowded into every nook in the hills,
immediately behind the town, and their now idle windmills lined the shore. It
was worth the while to see by what coarse and simple chemistry this almost
necessary of life is obtained, with the sun for journeyman, and a single
apprentice to do the chores for a large establishment. It is a sort of tropical
labor, pursued too in the sunniest season; more interesting than gold or
diamond-washing, which, I fancy, it somewhat resembles at a distance. In the
production of the necessaries of life Nature is ready enough to assist man. So
at the potash works which I have seen at Hull, where they burn the stems of the
kelp and boil the ashes. Verily, chemistry is not a splitting of hairs when you
have got half a dozen raw Irishmen in the laboratory. It is said, that owing to
the reflection of the sun from the sand-hills, and there being absolutely no
fresh water emptying into the harbor, the same number of superficial feet
yields more salt here than in any other part of the county. A little rain is
considered necessary to clear the air, and make salt fast and good, for as
paint does not dry, so water does not evaporate in dog-day weather. But they
were now, as elsewhere on the Cape, breaking up their salt-works and selling
them for lumber.</p>
<p>From that elevation we could overlook the operations of the inhabitants almost
as completely as if the roofs had been taken off. They were busily covering the
wicker-worked flakes about their houses with salted fish, and we now saw that
the back yards were improved for this purpose as much as the front; where one
man’s fish ended another’s began. In almost every yard we detected
some little building from which these treasures were being trundled forth and
systematically spread, and we saw that there was an art as well as a knack even
in spreading fish, and that a division of labor was profitably practised. One
man was withdrawing his fishes a few inches beyond the nose of his
neighbor’s cow which had stretched her neck over a paling to get at them.
It seemed a quite domestic employment, like drying clothes, and indeed in some
parts of the county the women take part in it.</p>
<p>I noticed in several places on the Cape a sort of clothes-<i>flakes</i>. They
spread brush on the ground, and fence it round, and then lay their clothes on
it, to keep them from the sand. This is a Cape Cod clothes-yard.</p>
<p>The sand is the great enemy here. The tops of some of the hills were enclosed
and a board put up, forbidding all persons entering the enclosure, lest their
feet should disturb the sand, and set it a-blowing or a-sliding. The
inhabitants are obliged to get leave from the authorities to cut wood behind
the town for fish-flakes, bean-poles, pea-brush, and the like, though, as we
were told, they may transplant trees from one part of the township to another
without leave. The sand drifts like snow, and sometimes the lower story of a
house is concealed by it, though it is kept off by a wall. The houses were
formerly built on piles, in order that the driving sand might pass under them.
We saw a few old ones here still standing on their piles, but they were boarded
up now, being protected by their younger neighbors. There was a school-house,
just under the hill on which we sat, filled with sand up to the tops of the
desks, and of course the master and scholars had fled. Perhaps they had
imprudently left the windows open one day, or neglected to mend a broken pane.
Yet in one place was advertised “Fine sand for sale here,”—I
could hardly believe my eyes,—probably some of the street sifted,—a
good instance of the fact that a man confers a value on the most worthless
thing by mixing himself with it, according to which rule we must have conferred
a value on the whole back-side of Cape Cod;—but I thought that if they
could have advertised “Fat Soil,” or perhaps “Fine sand got
rid of,” ay, and “Shoes emptied here,” it would have been
more alluring. As we looked down on the town, I thought that I saw one man, who
probably lived beyond the extremity of the planking, steering and tacking for
it in a sort of snow-shoes, but I may have been mistaken. In some pictures of
Provincetown the persons of the inhabitants are not drawn below the ankles, so
much being supposed to be buried in the sand. Nevertheless, natives of
Provincetown assured me that they could walk in the middle of the road without
trouble even in slippers, for they had learned how to put their feet down and
lift them up without taking in any sand. One man said that he should be
surprised if he found half a dozen grains of sand in his pumps at night, and
stated, moreover, that the young ladies had a dexterous way of emptying their
shoes at each step, which it would take a stranger a long time to learn. The
tires of the stage-wheels were about five inches wide; and the wagon-tires
generally on the Cape are an inch or two wider, as the sand is an inch or two
deeper than elsewhere. I saw a baby’s wagon with tires six inches wide to
keep it near the surface. The more tired the wheels, the less tired the horses.
Yet all the time that we were in Provincetown, which was two days and nights,
we saw only one horse and cart, and they were conveying a coffin. They did not
try such experiments there on common occasions. The next summer I saw only the
two-wheeled horse-cart which conveyed me thirty rods into the harbor on my way
to the steamer. Yet we read that there were two horses and two yoke of oxen
here in 1791, and we were told that there were several more when we were there,
beside the stage team. In Barber’s Historical Collections, it is said,
“So rarely are wheel-carriages seen in the place that they are a matter
of some curiosity to the younger part of the community. A lad who understood
navigating the ocean much better than land travel, on seeing a man driving a
wagon in the street, expressed his surprise at his being able to drive so
straight without the assistance of a rudder.” There was no rattle of
carts, and there would have been no rattle if there had been any carts. Some
saddle-horses that passed the hotel in the evening merely made the sand fly
with a rustling sound like a writer sanding his paper copiously, but there was
no sound of their tread. No doubt there are more horses and carts there at
present, A sleigh is never seen, or at least is a great novelty on the Cape,
the snow being either absorbed by the sand or blown into drifts.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the inhabitants of the Cape generally do not complain of their
“soil,” but will tell you that it is good enough for them to dry
their fish on.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding all this sand, we counted three meeting-houses, and four
school-houses nearly as large, on this street, though some had a tight board
fence about them to preserve the plot within level and hard. Similar fences,
even within a foot of many of the houses, gave the town a less cheerful and
hospitable appearance than it would otherwise have had. They told us that, on
the whole, the sand had made no progress for the last ten years, the cows being
no longer permitted to go at large, and every means being taken to stop the
sandy tide.</p>
<p>In 1727 Provincetown was “invested with peculiar privileges,” for
its encouragement. Once or twice it was nearly abandoned; but now lots on the
street fetch a high price, though titles to them were first obtained by
possession and improvement, and they are still transferred by quitclaim deeds
merely, the township being the property of the State. But though lots were so
valuable on the street, you might in many places throw a stone over them to
where a man could still obtain land, or sand, by squatting on or improving it.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus31"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/ptownvillage.jpg" width-obs="500" height-obs="306" alt="Provincetown—A bit of the village from the wharf" title="" /> <p class="caption">Provincetown—A bit of the village from the wharf</p> </div>
<p>Stones are very rare on the Cape. I saw a very few small stones used for
pavements and for bank walls, in one or two places in my walk, but they are so
scarce that, as I was informed, vessels have been forbidden to take them from
the beach for ballast, and therefore their crews used to land at night and
steal them. I did not hear of a rod of regular stone wall below Orleans. Yet I
saw one man underpinning a new house in Eastham with some “rocks,”
as he called them, which he said a neighbor had collected with great pains in
the course of years, and finally made over to him. This I thought was a gift
worthy of being recorded,—equal to a transfer of California
“rocks,” almost. Another man who was assisting him, and who seemed
to be a close observer of nature, hinted to me the locality of a rock in that
neighborhood which was “forty-two paces in circumference and fifteen feet
high,” for he saw that I was a stranger, and, probably, would not carry
it off. Yet I suspect that the locality of the few large rocks on the forearm
of the Cape is well known to the inhabitants generally. I even met with one man
who had got a smattering of mineralogy, but where he picked it up I could not
guess. I thought that he would meet with some interesting geological nuts for
him to crack, if he should ever visit the mainland, Cohasset, or Marblehead for
instance.</p>
<p>The well stones at the Highland Light were brought from Hingham, but the wells
and cellars of the Cape are generally built of brick, which also are imported.
The cellars, as well as the wells, are made in a circular form, to prevent the
sand from pressing in the wall. The former are only from nine to twelve feet in
diameter, and are said to be very cheap, since a single tier of brick will
suffice for a cellar of even larger dimensions. Of course, if you live in the
sand, you will not require a large cellar to hold your roots. In Provincetown,
when formerly they suffered the sand to drive under their houses, obliterating
all rudiments of a cellar, they did not raise a vegetable to put into one. One
farmer in Wellfleet, who raised fifty bushels of potatoes, showed me his cellar
under a corner of his house, not more than nine feet in diameter, looking like
a cistern: but he had another of the same size under his barn.</p>
<p>You need dig only a few feet almost anywhere near the shore of the Cape to find
fresh water. But that which we tasted was invariably poor. though the
inhabitants called it good, as if they were comparing it with salt water. In
the account of Truro, it is said. “Wells dug near the shore are dry at
low water, or rather at what is called young flood, but are replenished with
the flowing of the tide,”—- the salt water, which is lowest in the
sand, apparently forcing the fresh up. When you express your surprise at the
greenness of a Provincetown garden on the beach, in a dry season, they will
sometimes tell you that the tide forces the moisture up to them. It is an
interesting fact that low sand-bars in the midst of the ocean, perhaps even
those which are laid bare only at low tide, are reservoirs of fresh water at
which the thirsty mariner can supply himself. They appear, like huge sponges,
to hold the rain and dew which fall on them, and which, by capillary
attraction, are prevented from mingling with the surrounding brine.</p>
<p>The Harbor of Provincetown—which, as well as the greater part of the Bay,
and a wide expanse of ocean, we overlooked from our perch—is deservedly
famous. It opens to the south, is free from rocks, and is never frozen over. It
is said that the only ice seen in it drifts in sometimes from Barnstable or
Plymouth. Dwight remarks that “The storms which prevail on the American
coast generally come from the east; and there is no other harbor on a windward
shore within two hundred miles.” J. D. Graham, who has made a very minute
and thorough survey of this harbor and the adjacent waters, states that
“its capacity, depth of water, excellent anchorage, and the complete
shelter it affords from all winds, combine to render it one of the most
valuable ship harbors on our coast.” It is <i>the</i> harbor of the Cape
and of the fishermen of Massachusetts generally. It was known to navigators
several years at least before the settlement of Plymouth. In Captain John
Smith’s map of New England, dated 1614. it bears the name of Milford
Haven, and Massachusetts Bay that of Stuard’s Bay. His Highness, Prince
Charles, changed the name of Cape Cod to Cape James; but even princes have not
always power to change a name for the worse, and as Cotton Mather said, Cape
Cod is “a name which I suppose it will never lose till shoals of codfish
be seen swimming on its highest hills.”</p>
<p>Many an early voyager was unexpectedly caught by this hook, and found himself
embayed. On successive maps, Cape Cod appears sprinkled over with French,
Dutch, and English names, as it made part of New France, New Holland, and New
England. On one map Provincetown Harbor is called “Fuic (bownet?)
Bay,” Barnstable Bay “Staten Bay,” and the sea north of it
“Mare del Noort,” or the North Sea. On another, the extremity of
the Cape is called “Staten Hoeck,” or the States Hook. On another,
by Young, this has Noord Zee, Staten hoeck or Hit hoeck, but the copy at
Cambridge has no date; the whole Cape is called “Niew Hollant,”
(after Hudson); and on another still, the shore between Race Point and Wood End
appears to be called “Bevechier.” In Champlain’s admirable
Map of New France, including the oldest recognizable map of what is now the New
England coast with which I am acquainted, Cape Cod is called C. Blan (i.e. Cape
White), from the color of its sands, and Massachusetts Bay is Baye Blanche. It
was visited by De Monts and Champlain in 1605, and the next year was further
explored by Poitrincourt and Champlain. The latter has given a particular
account of these explorations in his “Voyages,” together with
separate charts and soundings of two of its harbors,—<i>Malle Barre</i>,
the Bad Bar (Nauset Harbor?), a name now applied to what the French called
<i>Cap Baturier</i>; and <i>Port Fortune</i>, apparently Chatham Harbor. Both
these names are copied on the map of “Novi Belgii,” in
Ogilvy’s America. He also describes minutely the manners and customs of
the savages, and represents by a plate the savages surprising the French and
killing five or six of them. The French afterward killed some of the natives,
and wished, by way of revenge, to carry off some and make them grind in their
hand-mill at Port Royal.</p>
<p>It is remarkable that there is not in English any adequate or correct account
of the French exploration of what is now the coast of New England, between 1604
and 1608, though it is conceded that they then made the first permanent
European settlement on the continent of North America north of St. Augustine.
If the lions had been the painters it would have been otherwise. This omission
is probably to be accounted for partly by the fact that the <i>early
edition</i> of Champlain’s “Voyages” had not been consulted
for this purpose. This contains by far the most particular, and, I think, the
most interesting chapter of what we may call the Ante-Pilgrim history of New
England, extending to one hundred and sixty pages quarto; but appears to be
unknown equally to the historian and the orator on Plymouth Rock. Bancroft does
not mention Champlain at all among the authorities for De Monts’s
expedition, nor does he say that he ever visited the coast of New England.
Though he bore the title of pilot to De Monts, he was, in <i>another sense</i>,
the leading spirit, as well as the historian of the expedition. Holmes,
Hildreth, and Barry, and apparently all our historians who mention Champlain,
refer to the edition of 1632, in which all the separate charts of our harbors,
etc., and about one-half the narrative, are omitted; for the author explored so
many lands afterward that he could afford to forget a part of what he had done.
Hildreth, speaking of De Monts’s expedition, says that “he looked
into the Penobscot [in 1605], which Pring had discovered two years
before,” saying nothing about Champlain’s extensive exploration of
it for De Monts in 1604 (Holmes says 1608, and refers to Purchas); also that he
followed in the track of Pring along the coast “to Cape Cod, which he
called Malabarre.” (Haliburton had made the same statement before him in
1829. He called it Cap Blanc, and Malle Barre (the Bad Bar) was the name given
to a harbor on the east side of the Cape). Pring says nothing about a river
there. Belknap says that Weymouth discovered it in 1605. Sir F. Gorges, says,
in his narration (Maine Hist. Coll., Vol. II., p. 19), 1658, that Pring in 1606
“made a perfect discovery of all the rivers and harbors.” This is
the most I can find. Bancroft makes Champlain to have dis-covered more western
rivers in Maine, not naming the Penobscot; he, however, must have been the
discoverer of distances on this river (see Belknap, p. 147). Pring was absent
from England only about six months, and sailed by this part of Cape Cod
(Malabarre) be-cause it yielded no sassafras, while the French, who probably
had not heard of Pring, were patiently for years exploring the coast in search
of a place of settlement, sounding and surveying its harbors.</p>
<p>John Smith’s map, published in 1616, from observations in 1614-15, is by
many regarded as the oldest map of New England. It is the first that was made
after this country was called New England, for he so called it; but in
Champlain’s “Voyages,” edition 1613 (and Lescarbot, in 1612,
quotes a still earlier account of his voyage), there is a map of it made when
it was known to Christendom as New France, called <i>Carte Géographique de la
Nouvelle Franse faictte par le Sieur de Champlain Saint Tongois Cappitaine
ordinaire pour le roi en la Marine,—faict l’en 1612</i>, from his
observations between 1604 and 1607; a map extending from Labrador to Cape Cod
and westward <i>to the Great Lakes</i>, and crowded with information,
geographical, ethnographical, zoölogical, and botanical. He even gives the
variation of the compass as observed by himself at that date on many parts of
the coast. This, taken together with the many <i>separate charts</i> of harbors
and their soundings on a large scale, which this volume contains,—among
the rest. <i>Qui ni be quy</i> (Kennebec), <i>Chouacoit R.</i> (Saco R.), <i>Le
Beau port, Port St. Louis</i> (near Cape Ann), and others on our
coast,—but <i>which are not in the edition of 1632</i>, makes this a
completer map of the New England and adjacent northern coast than was made for
half a century afterward, almost, we might be allowed to say, till another
Frenchman, Des Barres, made another for us, which only our late Coast Survey
has superseded. Most of the maps of this coast made for a long time after
betray their indebtedness to Champlain. He was a skilful navigator, a man of
science, and geographer to the King of France. He crossed the Atlantic about
twenty times, and made nothing of it; often in a small vessel in which few
would dare to go to sea today; and on one occasion making the voyage from
Tadoussac to St. Malo in eighteen days. He was in this neighborhood, that is,
between Annapolis, Nova Scotia, and Cape Cod, observing the land and its
inhabitants, and making a map of the coast, from May, 1604, to September, 1607,
<i>or about three and a half years</i>, and he has described minutely his
method of surveying harbors. By his own account, a part of his map was engraved
in 1604 (?). When Pont-Gravé and others returned to France in 1606, he remained
at Port Royal with Poitrincourt, “in order,” says he, “by the
aid of God, to finish the chart of the coasts which I had begun”; and
again in his volume, printed before John Smith visited this part of America, he
says: “It seems to me that I have done my duty as far as I could, if I
have not forgotten to put in my said chart whatever I saw, and give a
particular knowledge to the public of what had never been described nor
discovered so particularly as I have done it, although some other may have
heretofore written of it; but it was a very small affair in comparison with
what we have discovered within the last ten years.”</p>
<p>It is not generally remembered, if known, by the descendants of the Pilgrims,
that when their forefathers were spending their first memorable winter in the
New World, they had for neighbors a colony of French no further off than Port
Royal (Annapolis, Nova Scotia), three hundred miles distant (Prince seems to
make it about five hundred miles); where, in spite of many vicissitudes, they
had been for fifteen years. They built a grist-mill there as early as 1606;
also made bricks and turpentine on a stream, Williamson says, in 1606. De
Monts, who was a Protestant, brought his minister with him, who came to blows
with the Catholic priest on the subject of religion. Though these founders of
Acadie endured no less than the Pilgrims, and about the same proportion of
them—thirty-five out of seventy-nine (Williamson’s Maine says
thirty-six out of seventy)—died the first winter at St. Croix, 1604-5,
sixteen years earlier, no orator, to my knowledge, has ever celebrated their
enterprise (Williamson’s History of Maine does considerably), while the
trials which their successors and descendants endured at the hands of the
English have furnished a theme for both the historian and poet. (See
Bancroft’s History and Longfellow’s Evangeline.) The remains at
their fort at St. Croix were discovered at the end of the last century, and
helped decide where the true St. Croix, our boundary, was.</p>
<p>The very gravestones of those Frenchmen are probably older than the oldest
English monument in New England north of the Elizabeth Islands, or perhaps
anywhere in New England, for if there are any traces of Gosnold’s
storehouse left, his strong works are gone. Bancroft says, advisedly, in 1834,
“It requires a believing eye to discern the ruins of the fort”; and
that there were no ruins of a fort in 1837. Dr. Charles T. Jackson tells me
that, in the course of a geological survey in 1827, he discovered a gravestone,
a slab of trap rock, on Goat Island, opposite Annapolis (Port Royal), in Nova
Scotia, bearing a Masonic coat-of-arms and the date 1606, which is fourteen
years earlier than the landing of the Pilgrims. This was left in the possession
of Judge Haliburton, of Nova Scotia.</p>
<p>There were Jesuit priests in what has since been called New England, converting
the savages at Mount Desert, then St. Savior, in 1613,—having come over
to Port Royal in 1611, though they were almost immediately interrupted by the
English, years before the Pilgrims came hither to enjoy their own religion.
This according to Champlain. Charlevoix says the same; and after coming from
France in 1611, went west from Port Royal along the coast as far as the
Kennebec in 1612, and was often carried from Port Royal to Mount Desert.</p>
<p>Indeed, the Englishman’s history of <i>New</i> England commences only
when it ceases to be <i>New</i> France. Though Cabot was the first to discover
the continent of North America, Champlain, in the edition of his
“Voyages” printed in 1632, after the English had for a season got
possession of Quebec and Port Royal, complains with no little justice:
“The common consent of all Europe is to represent New France as extending
at least to the thirty-fifth and thirty-sixth degrees of latitude, as appears
by the maps of the world printed in Spain, Italy, Holland, Flanders, Germany,
and England, until they possessed themselves of the coasts of New France, where
are Acadie, the Etchemins (Maine and New Brunswick), the Almouchicois
(Massachusetts?), and the Great River St. Lawrence, where they have imposed,
according to their fancy, such names as New England, Scotland, and others; but
it is not easy to efface the memory of a thing which is known to all
Christendom.”</p>
<p>That Cabot merely landed on the uninhabitable shore of Labrador, gave the
English no just title to New England, or to the United States, generally, any
more than to Patagonia. His careful biographer (Biddle) is not certain in what
voyage he ran down the coast of the United States as is reported, and no one
tells us what he saw. Miller, in the New York Hist. Coll., Vol. I., p. 28, says
he does not appear to have landed anywhere. Contrast with this
Verrazzani’s tarrying fifteen days at one place on the New England coast,
and making frequent excursions into the interior thence. It chances that the
latter’s letter to Francis I., in 1524, contains “the earliest
original account extant of the Atlantic coast of the United States”; and
even from that time the northern part of it began to be called <i>La Terra
Francese</i>, or French Land. A part of it was called New Holland before it was
called New England. The English were very back-ward to explore and settle the
continent which they had stumbled upon. The French preceded them both in their
attempts to colonize the continent of North America (Carolina and Florida,
1562-4), and in their first permanent settlement (Port Royal, 1605); and the
right of possession, naturally enough, was the one which England mainly
respected and recognized in the case of Spain, of Portugal, and also of France,
from the time of Henry VII.</p>
<p>The explorations of the French gave to the world the first valuable maps of
these coasts. Denys of Honfleur made a map of the Gulf of St. Lawrence in 1506.
No sooner had Cartier explored the St. Lawrence, in 1535, than there began to
be published by his countrymen remarkably accurate charts of that river as far
up as Montreal. It is almost all of the continent north of Florida that you
recognize on charts for more than a generation afterward,—though
Verrazzani’s rude plot (made under French auspices) was regarded by
Hackluyt, more than fifty years after his voyage (in 1524), as the most
accurate representation of our coast. The French trail is distinct. They went
measuring and sounding, and when they got home had something to show for their
voyages and explorations. There was no danger of their charts being lost, as
Cabot’s have been.</p>
<p>The most distinguished navigators of that day were Italians, or of Italian
descent, and Portuguese. The French and Spaniards, though less advanced in the
science of navigation than the former, possessed more imagination and spirit of
adventure than the English, and were better fitted to be the explorers of a new
continent even as late as 1751.</p>
<p>This spirit it was which so early carried the French to the Great Lakes and the
Mississippi on the north, and the Spaniard to the same river on the south. It
was long before our frontiers reached their settlements in the west, and a
<i>voyageur</i> or <i>coureur de bois</i> is still our conductor there. Prairie
is a French word, as Sierra is a Spanish one. Augustine in Florida, and Santa
Fé in New Mexico [1582], both built by the Spaniards, are considered the oldest
towns in the United States. Within the memory of the oldest man, the
Anglo-Americans were confined between the Appalachian Mountains and the sea,
“a space not two hundred miles broad,” while the Mississippi was by
treaty the eastern boundary of New France. (See the pamphlet on settling the
Ohio, London, 1763, bound up with the travels of Sir John Bartram.) So far as
inland discovery was concerned, the adventurous spirit of the English was that
of sailors who land but for a day, and their enterprise the enterprise of
traders. Cabot spoke like an Englishman, as he was, if he said, as one reports,
in reference to the discovery of the American Continent, when he found it
running toward the north, that it was a great disappointment to him, being in
his way to India; but we would rather add to than detract from the fame of so
great a discoverer.</p>
<p>Samuel Penhallow, in his history (Boston, 1726), p. 51, speaking of “Port
Royal and Nova Scotia,” says of the last that its “first seizure
was by Sir Sebastian Cobbet for the crown of Great Britain, in the reign of
King Henry VII.; but lay dormant till the year 1621,” when Sir William
Alexander got a patent of it, and possessed it some years; and afterward Sir
David Kirk was proprietor of it, but erelong, “to the surprise of all
thinking men, it was given up unto the French.”</p>
<p>Even as late as 1633 we find Winthrop, the first Governor of the Massachusetts
Colony, who was not the most likely to be misinformed, who, moreover, has the
<i>fame</i>, at least, of having discovered Wachusett Mountain (discerned it
forty miles inland), talking about the “Great Lake” and the
“hideous swamps about it,” near which the Connecticut and the
“Potomack” took their rise; and among the memorable events of the
year 1642 he chronicles Darby Field, an Irishman’s expedition to the
“White hill,” from whose top he saw eastward what he “judged
to be the Gulf of Canada,” and westward what he “judged to be the
great lake which Canada River comes out of,” and where he found much
“Muscovy glass,” and “could rive out pieces of forty feet
long and seven or eight broad.” While the very inhabitants of New England
were thus fabling about the country a hundred miles inland, which was a
<i>terra incognita</i> to them,—or rather many years before the earliest
date referred to,—Champlain, the <i>first Governor of Canada</i>, not to
mention the inland discoveries of Cartier,<SPAN href="#linknote-9"
name="linknoteref-9" id="linknoteref-9"><sup>[1]</sup></SPAN> Roberval, and
others, of the preceding century, and his own earlier voyage, had already gone
to war against the Iroquois in their forest forts, and penetrated to the Great
Lakes and wintered there, before a Pilgrim had heard of New England.</p>
<p>In Champlain’s “Voyages,” printed in 1613, there is a plate
representing a fight in which he aided the Canada Indians against the Iroquois,
near the south end of Lake Champlain, in July, 1609, eleven years before the
settlement of Plymouth. Bancroft says he joined the Algonquins in an expedition
against the Iroquois, or Five Nations, in the northwest of New York. This is
that “Great Lake,” which the English, hearing some rumor of from
the French, long after, locate in an “Imaginary Province called Laconia,
and spent several years about 1630 in the vain attempt to discover.” (Sir
Ferdinand Gorges, in Maine Hist. Coll., Vol. II., p. 68.) Thomas Morton has a
chapter on this “Great Lake.” In the edition of Champlain’s
map dated 1632, the Falls of Niagara appear; and in a great lake northwest of
<i>Mer Douce</i> (Lake Huron) there is an island represented, over which is
written, “<i>Isle ou il y a une mine de
cuivre</i>,”—“Island where there is a mine of copper.”
This will do for an offset to our Governor’s “Muscovy Glass.”
Of all these adventures and discoveries we have a minute and faithful account,
giving facts and dates as well as charts and soundings, all scientific and
Frenchman-like, with scarcely one fable or traveller’s story.</p>
<p>Probably Cape Cod was visited by Europeans long before the seventeenth century.
It may be that Cabot himself beheld it. Verrazzani, in 1524, according to his
own account, spent fifteen days on our coast, in latitude 41° 40 minutes (some
suppose in the harbor of Newport), and often went five or six leagues into the
interior there, and he says that he sailed thence at once one hundred and fifty
leagues northeasterly, <i>always in sight of the coast</i>. There is a chart in
Hackluyt’s “Divers Voyages,” made according to
Verrazzani’s plot, which last is praised for its accuracy by Hackluyt,
but I cannot distinguish Cape Cod on it, unless it is the “C.
Arenas,” which is in the right latitude, though ten degrees west of
“Claudia,” which is thought to be Block Island.</p>
<p>The “Biographic Universelle” informs us that “An ancient
manuscript chart drawn in 1529 by Diego Ribeiro, a Spanish cosmographer, has
preserved the memory of the voyage of Gomez [a Portuguese sent out by Charles
the Fifth]. One reads in it under (<i>au dessous</i>) the place occupied by the
States of New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island, <i>Terre d’Etienne
Gomez, qu’il découvrit en</i> 1525 (Land of Etienne Gomez, which he
discovered in 1525).” This chart, with a memoir, was published at Weimar
in the last century.</p>
<p>Jean Alphonse, Roberval’s pilot in Canada in 1642, one of the most
skilful navigators of his time, and who has given remarkably minute and
accurate direction for sailing up the St. Lawrence, showing that he knows what
he is talking about, says in his “<i>Routier</i>” (it is in
Hackluyt), “I have been at a bay as far as the forty-second degree,
between Norimbegue [the Penobscot?] and Florida, but I have not explored the
bottom of it, and I do not know whether it passes from one land to the
other,” <i>i.e.</i> to Asia. (“ J’ai été à une Baye
jusques par les 42<sup>e</sup> degres entre la Norimbegue et la Floride; mais je n’en
ai pas cherché le fond, et ne sçais pas si elle passe d’une terre
à l’autre.”) This may refer to Massachusetts Bay, if not
possibly to the western inclination of the coast a little farther south. When
he says, “I have no doubt that the Norimbegue enters into the river of
Canada,” he is perhaps so interpreting some account which the Indians had
given respecting the route from the St. Lawrence to the Atlantic by the St.
John, or Penobscot, or possibly even the Hudson River.</p>
<p>We hear rumors of this country of “Norumbega” and its great city
from many quarters. In a discourse by a great French sea-captain in
Ramusio’s third volume (1556-65), this is said to be the name given to
the land by its inhabitants, and Verrazzani is called the discoverer of it;
another in 1607 makes the natives call it, or the river, Aguncia. It is
represented as an island on an accompanying chart. It is frequently spoken of
by old writers as a country of indefinite extent, between Canada and Florida,
and it appears as a large island with Cape Breton at its eastern extremity, on
the map made according to Verrazzani’s plot in Hackluyt’s
“Divers Voyages.” These maps and rumors may have been the origin of
the notion, common among the early settlers, that New England was an island.
The country and city of Norumbega appear about where Maine now is on a map in
Ortelius (“Theatrum Orbis Terrarum,” Antwerp, 1570), and the
“R. Grande” is drawn where the Penobscot or St. John might be.</p>
<p>In 1604, Champlain being sent by the Sieur de Monts to explore the coast of
Norumbegue, sailed up the Penobscot twenty-two or twenty-three leagues from
“Isle Haute,” or till he was stopped by the falls. He says:
“I think that this river is that which many pilots and historians call
Norumbegue, and which the greater part have described as great and spacious,
with numerous islands; and its entrance in the forty-third or forty-third and
one half or, according to others, the forty-fourth degree of latitude, more or
less.” He is convinced that “the greater part” of those who
speak of a great city there have never seen it, but repeat a mere rumor, but he
thinks that some have seen the mouth of the river since it answers to their
description.</p>
<p>Under date of 1607 Champlain writes: “Three or four leagues north of the
Cap de Poitrincourt [near the head of the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia] we found
a cross, which was very old, covered with moss and almost all decayed, which
was an evident sign that there had formerly been Christians there.”</p>
<p>Also the following passage from Lescarbot will show how much the neighboring
coasts were frequented by Europeans in the sixteenth century. Speaking of his
return from Port Royal to France in 1607, he says: “At last, within four
leagues of Campseau [the Gut of Canso], we arrived at a harbor [in Nova
Scotia], where a worthy old gentleman from St. John de Lus, named Captain
Savale, was fishing, who received us with the utmost courtesy. And as this
harbor, which is small, but very good, has no name, I have given it on my
geographical chart the name of Savalet. [It is on Champlain’s map also.]
This worthy man told us that this voyage was the forty-second which he had made
to those parts, and yet the Newfoundlanders [<i>Terre neuviers</i>] make only
one a year. He was wonderfully content with his fishery, and informed us that
he made daily fifty crowns’ worth of cod, and that his voyage would be
worth ten thousand francs. He had sixteen men in his employ; and his vessel was
of eighty tons, which could carry a hundred thousand dry cod.” (Histoire
de la Nouvelle France, 1612.) They dried their fish on the rocks on shore.</p>
<p>The “Isola della Réna” (Sable Island?) appears on the chart of
“Nuova Francia” and Norumbega, accompanying the
“Discourse” above referred to in Ramusio’s third volume,
edition 1556-65. Champlain speaks of there being at the Isle of Sable, in 1604,
“grass pastured by oxen (<i>bÅ“ufs</i>) and cows which the Portuguese
carried there more than sixty years ago,” <i>i.e.</i> sixty years before
1613; in a later edition he says, which came out of a Spanish vessel which was
lost in endeavoring to settle on the Isle of Sable; and he states that De la
Roche’s men, who were left on this island seven years from 1598, lived on
the flesh of these cattle which they found “<i>en quantie)</i>,”
and built houses out of the wrecks of vessels which came to the island
(“perhaps Gilbert’s”), there being no wood or stone.
Lescarbot says that they lived “on fish and the milk of cows left there
about eighty years before by Baron de Leri and Saint Just.” Charlevoix
says they ate up the cattle and then lived on fish. Haliburton speaks of cattle
left there as a rumor. De Leri and Saint Just had suggested plans of
colonization on the Isle of Sable as early as 1515 (1508?) according to
Bancroft, referring to Charlevoix. These are but a few of the instances which I
might quote.</p>
<p>Cape Cod is commonly said to have been discovered in 1602. We will consider at
length under what circumstances, and with what observation and expectations,
the first Englishmen whom history clearly discerns approached the coast of New
England. According to the accounts of Archer and Brereton (both of whom
accompanied Gosnold), on the 26th of March, 1602, old style. Captain
Bartholomew Gosnold set sail from Falmouth, England, for the North part of
Virginia, in a small bark called the <i>Concord</i>, they being in all, says
one account, “thirty-two persons, whereof eight mariners and sailors,
twelve purposing upon the discovery to return with the ship for England, the
rest remain there for population.” This is regarded as “the first
attempt of the English to make a settlement within the limits of New
England.” Pursuing a new and a shorter course than the usual one by the
Canaries, “the 14th of April following” they had sight of Saint
Mary’s, an island of the Azores. As their sailors were few and
“none of the best” (I use their own phrases), and they were
“going upon an unknown coast,” they were not “overbold to
stand in with the shore but in open weather”; so they made their first
discovery of land with the lead. The 23d of April the ocean appeared yellow,
but on taking up some of the water in a bucket, “it altered not either in
color or taste from the sea azure.” The 7th of May they saw divers birds
whose names they knew, and many others in their “English tongue of no
name.” The 8th of May “the water changed to a yellowish green,
where at seventy fathoms” they “had ground.” The 9th, they
had upon their lead “many glittering stones,”—“which
might promise some mineral matter in the bottom.” The 10th, they were
over a bank which they thought to be near the western end of St. John’s
Island, and saw schools of fish. The 12th, they say, “continually passed
fleeting by us sea-oare, which seemed to have their movable course towards the
northeast.” On the 13th, they observed “great beds of weeds, much
wood, and divers things else floating by,” and “had smelling of the
shore much as from the southern Cape and Andalusia in Spain.” On Friday,
the 14th, early in the morning they descried land on the north, in the latitude
of forty-three degrees, apparently some part of the coast of Maine. Williamson
(History of Maine) says it certainly could not have been south of the central
Isle of Shoals. Belknap inclines to think it the south side of Cape Ann.
Standing fair along by the shore, about twelve o’clock the same day, they
came to anchor and were visited by eight savages, who came off to them
“in a Biscay shallop, with sail and oars,”—“an iron
grapple, and a kettle of copper.” These they at first mistook for
“Christians distressed.” One of them was “apparelled with a
waistcoat and breeches of black serge, made after our sea-fashion, hoes and
shoes on his feet; all the rest (saving one that had a pair of breeches of blue
cloth) were naked.” They appeared to have had dealings with “some
Basques of St. John de Luz, and to understand much more than we,” say the
English, “for want of language, could comprehend.” But they soon
“set sail westward, leaving them and their coast.” (This was a
remarkable discovery for discoverers.)</p>
<p>“The 15th day,” writes Gabriel Archer, “we had again sight of
the land, which made ahead, being as we thought an island, by reason of a large
sound that appeared westward between it and the main, for coming to the west
end thereof, we did perceive a large opening, we called it Shoal Hope. Near
this cape we came to anchor in fifteen fathoms, where we took great store of
cod-fish, for which we altered the name and called it Cape Cod. Here we saw
skulls of her-ring, mackerel, and other small fish, in great abundance. This is
a low sandy shoal, but without danger; also we came to anchor again in sixteen
fathoms, fair by the land in the latitude of forty-two degrees. This Cape is
well near a mile broad, and lieth northeast by east. The captain went here
ashore, and found the ground to be full of peas, strawberries, whortleberries,
etc., as then unripe, the sand also by the shore somewhat deep; the firewood
there by us taken in was of cypress, birch, witch-hazel, and beach. A young
Indian came here to the captain, armed with his bow and arrows, and had certain
plates of copper hanging at his ears; he showed a willingness to help us in our
occasions.”</p>
<p>“The 16th we trended the coast southerly, which was all champaign and
full of grass, but the islands somewhat woody.”</p>
<p>Or, according to the account of John Brereton, “riding here,” that
is, where they first communicated with the natives, “in no very good
harbor, and withal doubting the weather, about three of the clock the same day
in the afternoon we weighed, and standing southerly off into sea the rest of
that day and the night following, with a fresh gale of wind, in the morning we
found ourselves embayed with a mighty headland; but coming to an anchor about
nine of the clock the same day, within a league of the shore, we hoisted out
the one half of our shallop, and Captain Bartholomew Gosnold, myself and three
others, went ashore, being a white sandy and very bold shore; and marching all
that afternoon with our muskets on our necks, on the highest hills which we saw
(the weather very hot), at length we perceived this headland to be parcel of
the main, and sundry islands lying almost round about it; so returning towards
evening to our shallop (for by that time the other part was brought ashore and
set together), we espied an Indian, a young man of proper stature, and of a
pleasing countenance, and after some familiarity with him, we left him at the
sea side, and returned to our ship, where in five or six hours’ absence
we had pestered our ship so with codfish, that we threw numbers of them
overboard again; and surely I am persuaded that in the months of March, April,
and May, there is upon this coast better fishing, and in as great plenty, as in
Newfoundland; for the skulls of mackerel, herrings, cod, and other fish, that
we daily saw as we went and came from the shore, were wonderful,” etc.</p>
<p>“From this place we sailed round about this headland, almost all the
points of the compass, the shore very bold; but as no coast is free from
dangers, so I am persuaded this is as free as any. The land somewhat low, full
of goodly woods, but in some places plain.”</p>
<p>It is not quite clear on which side of the Cape they landed. If it was inside,
as would appear from Brereton’s words, “From this place we sailed
round about this headland almost all the points of the compass,” it must
have been on the western shore either of Truro or Wellfleet. To one sailing
south into Barnstable Bay along the Cape, the only “white, sandy, and
very bold shore” that appears is in these towns, though the bank is not
so high there as on the eastern side. At a distance of four or five miles the
sandy cliffs there look like a long fort of yellow sandstone, they are so level
and regular, especially in Wellfleet,—the fort of the land defending
itself against the encroachments of the Ocean. They are streaked here and there
with a reddish sand as if painted. Farther south the shore is more flat, and
less <i>obviously</i> and abruptly sandy, and a little tinge of green here and
there in the marshes appears to the sailor like a rare and precious emerald.
But in the Journal of Pring’s Voyage the next year (and Salterne, who was
with Pring, had accompanied Gosnold) it is said, “Departing hence
[<i>i.e.</i> from Savage Rocks] we bore unto that great gulf which Captain
Gosnold overshot the year before.”<SPAN href="#linknote-10"
name="linknoteref-10" id="linknoteref-10"><sup>[2]</sup></SPAN></p>
<p>So they sailed round the Cape, calling the southeasterly extremity “Point
Cave,” till they came to an island which they named Martha’s
Vineyard (now called No Man’s Land), and another on which they dwelt
awhile, which they named Elizabeth’s Island, in honor of the Queen, one
of the group since so called, now known by its Indian name Cuttyhunk. There
they built a small storehouse, the first house built by the English in New
England, whose cellar could recently still be seen, made partly of stones taken
from the beach. Bancroft says (edition of 1837), the ruins of the fort can no
longer be discerned. They who were to have remained becoming discontented, all
together set sail for England with a load of sassafras and other commodities,
on the 18th of June following.</p>
<p>The next year came Martin Pring, looking for sassafras, and thereafter they
began to come thick and fast, until long after sassafras had lost its
reputation.</p>
<p>These are the oldest acounts which we have of Cape Cod, unless, perchance. Cape
Cod is, as some suppose, the same with that “Kial-ar-nes” or
Keel-Cape, on which, according to old Icelandic manuscripts, Thorwald, son of
Eric the Red, after sailing many days southwest from Greenland, broke his keel
in the year 1004; and where, according to another, in some respects less
trustworthy manuscript, Thor-finn Karlsefue (“that is, one who promises
or is destined to be an able or great man”; he is said to have had a son
born in New. England, from whom Thorwaldsen the sculptor was descended),
sailing past, in the year 1007, with his wife Gudrida, Snorre Thorbrandson,
Biarne Grinolfson, and Thorhall Garnlason, distinguished Norsemen, in three
ships containing “one hundred and sixty men and all sorts of live
stock” (probably the first Norway rats among the rest), having the land
“on the right side” of them, “roved ashore,” and found
“<i>ör-æfi</i> (trackless deserts),” and “<i>Strand-ir
láng-ar ok sand-ar</i> (long narrow beaches and sand-hills),” and
“called the shores <i>Furdustrand-ir</i> (Wonder-Strands), because the
sailing by them seemed long.”</p>
<p>According to the Icelandic manuscripts, <i>Thorwald</i> was the first,
then,—unless possibly one Biarne Heriulfson (<i>i.e.</i> son of Heriulf)
who had been seized with a great desire to travel, sailing from Iceland to
Greenland in the year 986 to join his father who had migrated thither, for he
had resolved, says the manuscript, “to spend the following winter, like
all the preceding ones, with his father,”—being driven far to the
southwest by a storm, when it cleared up saw the low land of Cape Cod looming
faintly in the distance; but this not answering to the description of
Greenland, he put his vessel about, and, sailing northward along the coast, at
length reached Greenland and his father. At any rate, he may put forth a strong
claim to be regarded as the discoverer of the American continent.</p>
<p>These Northmen were a hardy race, whose younger sons inherited the ocean, and
traversed it without chart or compass, and they are said to have been
“the first who learned the art of sailing on a wind.” Moreover,
they had a habit of casting their door-posts overboard and settling wherever
they went ashore. But as Biarne, and Thorwald, and Thorfinn have not mentioned
the latitude and longitude distinctly enough, though we have great respect for
them as skilful and adventurous navigators, we must for the present remain in
doubt as to what capes they did see. We think that they were considerably
further north.</p>
<p>If time and space permitted, I could present the claims of other several worthy
persons. Lescarbot, in 1609, asserts that the French sailors had been
accustomed to frequent the Newfoundland Banks from time immemorial, “for
the codfish with which they feed almost all Europe and supply all sea-going
vessels,” and accordingly “the language of the nearest lands is
half Basque”; and he quotes Postel, a learned but extravagant French
author, born in 1510, only six years after the Basques, Bretons, and Normans
are said to have discovered the Grand Bank and adjacent islands, as saying, in
his <i>Charte Géographique</i>, which we have not seen: “Terra haec ob
lucrosissimam piscationis utilitatem summa litterarum memoria a Gallis adiri
solita, et ante mille sexcentos annos frequentari solita est; sed eo quod sit
urbibus inculta et vasta, spreta est.” “This land, on account of
its very lucrative fishery, was accustomed to be visited by the Gauls from the
very dawn of history, and more than sixteen hundred years ago was accustomed to
be frequented; but because it was unadorned with cities, and waste, it was
despised.”</p>
<p>It is the old story. Bob Smith discovered the mine, but I discovered it to the
world. And now Bob Smith is putting in his claim.</p>
<p>But let us not laugh at Postel and his visions. He was perhaps better posted up
than we; and if he does seem to draw the long bow, it may be because he had a
long way to shoot,—quite across the Atlantic, If America was found and
lost again once, as most of us believe, then why not twice? especially as there
were likely to be so few records of an earlier discovery. Consider what stuff
history is made of,—that for the most part it is merely a story agreed on
by posterity. Who will tell us even how many Russians were engaged in the
battle of the Chernaya, the other day? Yet no doubt, Mr. Scriblerus, the
historian, will fix on a definite number for the schoolboys to commit to their
excellent memories. What, then, of the number of Persians at Salamis? The
historian whom I read knew as much about the position of the parties and their
tactics in the last-mentioned affair, as they who describe a recent battle in
an article for the press now-a-days, before the particulars have arrived. I
believe that, if I were to live the life of mankind over again myself (which I
would not be hired to do), with the Universal History in my hands, I should not
be able to tell what was what.</p>
<p>Earlier than the date Postel refers to, at any rate. Cape Cod lay in utter
darkness to the civilized world, though even then the sun rose from eastward
out of the sea every day, and, rolling over the Cape, went down westward into
the Bay. It was even then Cape and Bay,—ay, the Cape of <i>Codfish</i>,
and the Bay of the <i>Massachusetts</i>, perchance.</p>
<p>Quite recently, on the 11th of November, 1620, old style, as is well known, the
Pilgrims in the <i>Mayflower</i> came to anchor in Cape Cod harbor. They had
loosed from Plymouth, England, the 6th of September, and, in the words of
“Mourts’ Relation,” “after many difficulties in
boisterous storms, at length, by God’s providence, upon the 9th of
November, we espied land, which we deemed to be Cape Cod, and so afterward it
proved. Upon the 11th of November we came to anchor in the bay, which is a good
harbor and pleasant bay, circled round except in the entrance, which is about
four miles over from land to land, compassed about to the very sea with oaks,
pines, juniper, sassafras, and other sweet wood. It is a harbor wherein a
thousand sail of ships may safely ride. There we relieved ourselves with wood
and water, and refreshed our people, while our shallop was fitted to coast the
bay, to search for an habitation.” There we put up at Fuller’s
Hotel, passing by the Pilgrim House as too high for us (we learned afterward
that we need not have been so particular), and we refreshed ourselves with
hashed fish and beans, beside taking in a supply of liquids (which were not
intoxicating), while our legs were refitted to coast the back-side. Further say
the Pilgrims: “We could not come near the shore by three quarters of an
English mile, because of shallow water; which was a great prejudice to us; for
our people going on shore were forced to wade a bow-shot or two in going aland,
which caused many to get colds and coughs; for it was many times freezing cold
weather.” They afterwards say: “It brought much weakness amongst
us”; and no doubt it led to the death of some at Plymouth.</p>
<p>The harbor of Provincetown is very shallow near the shore, especially about the
head, where the Pilgrims landed. When I left this place the next summer, the
steamer could not get up to the wharf, but we were carried out to a large boat
in a cart as much as thirty rods in shallow water, while a troop of little boys
kept us company, wading around, and thence we pulled to the steamer by a rope.
The harbor being thus shallow and sandy about the shore, coasters are
accustomed to run in here to paint their vessels, which are left high and dry
when the tide goes down.</p>
<p>It chanced that the Sunday morning that we were there, I had joined a party of
men who were smoking and lolling over a pile of boards on one of the wharves
(<i>nihil humanum a me, etc</i>.), when our landlord, who was a sort of
tithing-man, went off to stop some sailors who were engaged in painting their
vessel. Our party was recruited from time to time by other citizens, who came
rubbing their eyes as if they had just got out of bed; and one old man remarked
to me that it was the custom there to lie abed very late on Sunday, it being a
day of rest. I remarked that, as I thought, they might as well let the men
paint, for all us. It was not noisy work, and would not disturb our devotions.
But a young man in the company, taking his pipe out of his mouth, said that it
was a plain contradiction of the law of God, which he quoted, and if they did
not have some such regulation, vessels would run in there to tar, and rig, and
paint, and they would have no Sabbath at all. This was a good argument enough,
if he had not put it in the name of religion. The next summer, as I sat on a
hill there one sultry Sunday afternoon the meeting-house windows being open, my
meditations were interrupted by the noise of a preacher who shouted like a
boatswain, profaning the quiet atmosphere, and who, I fancied, must have taken
off his coat. Few things could have been more disgusting or disheartening. I
wished the tithing-man would stop him.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus32"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/dayofrest.jpg" width-obs="279" height-obs="450" alt="The day of rest" title="" /> <p class="caption">The day of rest</p> </div>
<p>The Pilgrims say: “There was the greatest store of fowl that ever we
saw.”</p>
<p>We saw no fowl there, except gulls of various kinds; but the greatest store of
them that ever we saw was on a flat but slightly covered with water on the east
side of the harbor, and we observed a man who had landed there from a boat
creeping along the shore in order to get a shot at them, but they all rose and
flew away in a great scattering flock, too soon for him, having apparently got
their dinners, though he did not get his.</p>
<p>It is remarkable that the Pilgrims (or their reporter) describe this part of
the Cape, not only as well wooded, but as having a deep and excellent soil, and
hardly mention the word <i>sand</i>. Now what strikes the voyager is the
barrenness and desolation of the land. <i>They</i> found “the ground or
earth sand-hills, much like the downs in Holland, but much better the crust of
the earth, a spit’s depth, excellent black earth.” <i>We</i> found
that the earth had lost its crust,—if, in-deed, it ever had
any,—and that there was no soil to speak of. We did not see enough black
earth in Provincetown to fill a flower-pot, unless in the swamps. They found it
“all wooded with oaks, pines, sassafras, juniper, birch, holly, vines,
some ash, walnut; the wood for the most part open and without underwood, fit
either to go or ride in.” We saw scarcely anything high enough to be
called a tree, except a little low wood at the east end of the town, and the
few ornamental trees in its yards,—only a few small specimens of some of
the above kinds on the sand-hills in the rear; but it was all thick shrubbery,
without any large wood above it, very unfit either to go or ride in. The
greater part of the land was a perfect desert of yellow sand, rippled like
waves by the wind, in which only a little Beach-grass grew here and there. They
say that, just after passing the head of East Harbor Creek, the boughs and
bushes “tore” their “very armor in pieces” (the same
thing happened to such armor as we wore, when out of curiosity we took to the
bushes); or they came to deep valleys, “full of brush, wood-gaile, and
long grass,” and “found springs of fresh water.”</p>
<p>For the most part we saw neither bough nor bush, not so much as a shrub to tear
our clothes against if we would, and a sheep would lose none of its fleece,
even if it found herbage enough to make fleece grow there. We saw rather beach
and poverty-grass, and merely sorrel enough to color the surface. I suppose,
then, by Woodgaile they mean the Bay berry.</p>
<p>All accounts agree in affirming that this part of the Cape was
<i>comparatively</i> well wooded a century ago. But notwithstanding the great
changes which have taken place in these respects, I cannot but think that we
must make some allowance for the greenness of the Pilgrims in these matters,
which caused them to see green. We do not believe that the trees were large or
the soil was deep here. Their account may be true particularly, but it is
generally false. They saw literally, as well as figuratively, but one side of
the Cape. They naturally exaggerated the fairness and attractiveness of the
land, for they were glad to get to any land at all after that anxious voyage.
Everything appeared to them of the color of the rose, and had the scent of
juniper and sassafras. Very different is the general and off-hand account given
by Captain John Smith, who was on this coast six years earlier, and speaks like
an old traveller, voyager, and soldier, who had seen too much of the world to
exaggerate, or even to dwell long, on a part of it. In his “Description
of New England,” printed in 1616, after speaking of Accomack, since
called Plymouth, he says: “Cape Cod is the next presents itself, which is
only a headland of high hills of sand, overgrown with shrubby pines,
<i>hurts</i> [i.e. whorts, or whortleberries], and such trash, but an excellent
harbor for all weathers. This Cape is made by the main sea on the one side, and
a great bay on the other, in form of a sickle.” Champlain had already
written, “Which we named <i>Cap Blanc</i> (Cape White), because they were
sands and downs (<i>sables et dunes</i>) which appeared thus.”</p>
<p>When the Pilgrims get to Plymouth their reporter says again, “The land
for the crust of the earth is a spit’s depth,”—that would
seem to be their recipe for an earth’s crust,—“excellent
black mould and fat in some places.” However, according to Bradford
himself, whom some consider the author of part of “Mourt’s
Relation,” they who came over in the <i>Fortune</i> the next year were
somewhat daunted when “they came into the harbor of Cape Cod, and there
saw nothing but a naked and barren place.” They soon found out their
mistake with respect to the goodness of Plymouth soil. Yet when at length, some
years later, when they were fully satisfied of the poorness of the place which
they had chosen, “the greater part,” says Bradford,
“consented to a removal to a place called Nausett,” they agreed to
remove all together to Nauset, now Eastham, which was jumping out of the
frying-pan into the fire; and some of the most respectable of the inhabitants
of Plymouth did actually remove thither accordingly.</p>
<p>It must be confessed that the Pilgrims possessed but few of the qualities of
the modern pioneer. They were not the ancestors of the American backwoodsmen.
They did not go at once into the woods with their axes. They were a family and
church, and were more anxious to keep together, though it were on the sand,
than to explore and colonize a New World. When the above-mentioned company
removed to Eastham, the church at Plymouth was left, to use Bradford’s
expression, “like an ancient mother grown old, and forsaken of her
children.” Though they landed on Clark’s Island in Plymouth harbor,
the 9th of December (O. S.), and the 16th all hands came to Plymouth, and the
18th they rambled about the mainland, and the 19th decided to settle there, it
was the 8th of January before Francis Billington went with one of the
master’s mates to look at the magnificent pond or lake now called
“Billington Sea,” about two miles distant, which he had discovered
from the top of a tree, and mistook for a great sea. And the 7th of March
“Master Carver with five others went to the great ponds which seem to be
excellent fishing,” both which points are within the compass of an
ordinary afternoon’s ramble,—however wild the country. It is true
they were busy at first about their building, and were hindered in that by much
foul weather; but a party of emigrants to California or Oregon, with no less
work on their hands,—and more hostile Indians,—would do as much
exploring the first afternoon, and the Sieur de Champlain would have sought an
interview with the savages, and examined the country as far as the Connecticut,
and made a map of it, before Billington had climbed his tree. Or contrast them
only with the French searching for copper about the Bay of Fundy in 1603,
tracing up small streams with Indian guides. Nevertheless, the Pilgrims were
pioneers and the ancestors of pioneers, in a far grander enterprise.</p>
<p>By this time we saw the little steamer <i>Naushon</i> entering the harbor, and
heard the sound of her whistle, and came down from the hills to meet her at the
wharf. So we took leave of Cape Cod and its inhabitants. We liked the manners
of the last, what little we saw of them, very much. They were particularly
downright and good-humored. The old people appeared remarkably well preserved,
as if by the saltness of the atmosphere, and after having once mistaken, we
could never be certain whether we were talking to a coeval of our grandparents,
or to one of our own age. They are said to be more purely the descendants of
the Pilgrims than the inhabitants of any other part of the State. We were told
that “sometimes, when the court comes together at Barnstable, they have
not a single criminal to try, and the jail is shut up.” It was “to
let” when we were there. Until quite recently there was no regular lawyer
below Orleans. Who then will complain of a few regular man-eating sharks along
the back-side?</p>
<p>One of the ministers of Truro, when I asked what the fishermen did in the
winter, answered that they did nothing but go a-visiting, sit about and tell
stories,—though they worked hard in summer. Yet it is not a long vacation
they get. I am sorry that I have not been there in the winter to hear their
yarns. Almost every Cape man is Captain of some craft or other,—every man
at least who is at the head of his own affairs, though it is not every one that
is, for some heads have the force of <i>Alpha privative</i>, negativing all the
efforts which Nature would fain make through them. The greater number of men
are merely corporals. It is worth the while to talk with one whom his neighbors
address as Captain, though his craft may have long been sunk, and he may be
holding by his teeth to the shattered mast of a pipe alone, and only gets
half-seas-over in a figurative sense, now. He is pretty sure to vindicate his
right to the title at last,—can tell one or two good stories at least.</p>
<p>For the most part we saw only the back-side of the towns, but our story is true
as far as it goes. We might have made more of the Bay side, but we were
inclined to open our eyes widest at the Atlantic. We did not care to see those
features of the Cape in which it is inferior or merely equal to the mainland,
but only those in which it is peculiar or superior. We cannot say how its towns
look in front to one who goes to meet them; we went to see the ocean behind
them. They were merely the raft on which we stood, and we took notice of the
barnacles which adhered to it, and some carvings upon it.</p>
<p>Before we left the wharf we made the acquaintance of a passenger whom we had
seen at the hotel. When we asked him which way he came to Provincetown, he
answered that he was cast ashore at Wood End, Saturday night, in the same storm
in which the <i>St. John</i> was wrecked. He had been at work as a carpenter in
Maine, and took passage for Boston in a schooner laden with lumber. When the
storm came up, they endeavored to get into Provincetown harbor. “It was
dark and misty,” said he, “and as we were steering for Long Point
Light we suddenly saw the land near us,—for our compass was out of
order,—varied several degrees [a mariner always casts the blame on his
compass],—but there being a mist on shore, we thought it was farther off
than it was, and so held on, and we immediately struck on the bar. Says the
Captain, ‘We are all lost.’ Says I to the Captain, ‘Now
don’t let her strike again this way; head her right on.’ The
Captain thought a moment, and then headed her on. The sea washed completely
over us, and wellnigh took the breath out of my body. I held on to the running
rigging, but I have learned to hold on to the standing rigging the next
time.” “Well, were there any drowned?” I asked. “No; we
all got safe to a house at Wood End, at midnight, wet to our skins, and half
frozen to death.” He had apparently spent the time since playing checkers
at the hotel, and was congratulating himself on having beaten a tall
fellow-boarder at that game. “The vessel is to be sold at auction
to-day,” he added. (We had heard the sound of the crier’s bell
which advertised it.) “The Captain is rather down about it, but I tell
him to cheer up and he will soon get another vessel.”</p>
<p>At that moment the Captain called to him from the wharf. He looked like a man
just from the country, with a cap made of a woodchuck’s skin, and now
that I had heard a part of his history, he appeared singularly
destitute,—a Captain without any vessel, only a great-coat! and that
perhaps a borrowed one! Not even a dog followed him; only his title stuck to
him. I also saw one of the crew. They all had caps of the same pattern, and
wore a subdued look, in addition to their naturally aquiline features, as if a
breaker—a “comber”—had washed over them. As we passed
Wood End, we noticed the pile of lumber on the shore which had made the cargo
of their vessel.</p>
<p>About Long Point in the summer you commonly see them catching lobsters for the
New York market, from small boats just off the shore, or rather, the lobsters
catch themselves, for they cling to the netting on which the bait is placed of
their own accord, and thus are drawn up. They sell them fresh for two cents
apiece. Man needs to know but little more than a lobster in order to catch him
in his traps. The mackerel fleet had been getting to sea, one after another,
ever since midnight, and as we were leaving the Cape we passed near to many of
them under sail, and got a nearer view than we had had;—half a dozen
red-shirted men and boys, leaning over the rail to look at us, the skipper
shouting back the number of barrels he had caught, in answer to our inquiry.
All sailors pause to watch a steamer, and shout in welcome or derision. In one
a large Newfoundland dog put his paws on the rail and stood up as high as any
of them, and looked as wise. But the skipper, who did not wish to be seen no
better employed than a dog, rapped him on the nose and sent him below. Such is
human justice! I thought I could hear him making an effective appeal down there
from human to divine justice. He must have had much the cleanest breast of the
two.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="illus33"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/ptownfishing.jpg" width-obs="305" height-obs="450" alt="A Provincetown fishing-vessel" title="" /> <p class="caption">A Provincetown fishing-vessel</p> </div>
<p>Still, many a mile behind us across the Bay, we saw the white sails of the
mackerel fishers hovering round Cape Cod, and when they were all hull-down, and
the low extremity of the Cape was also down, their white sails still appeared
on both sides of it, around where it had sunk, like a city on the ocean,
proclaiming the rare qualities of Cape Cod Harbor. But before the extremity of
the Cape had completely sunk, it appeared like a filmy sliver of land lying
flat on the ocean, and later still a mere reflection of a sand-bar on the haze
above. Its name suggests a homely truth, but it would be more poetic if it
described the impression which it makes on the beholder. Some capes have
peculiarly suggestive names. There is Cape Wrath, the northwest point of
Scotland, for instance; what a good name for a cape lying far away dark over
the water under a lowering sky!</p>
<p>Mild as it was on shore this morning, the wind was cold and piercing on the
water. Though it be the hottest day in July on land, and the voyage is to last
but four hours, take your thickest clothes with you, for you are about to float
over melted icebergs. When I left Boston in the steamboat on the 25th of June
the next year, it was a quite warm day on shore. The passengers were dressed in
their thinnest clothes, and at first sat under their umbrellas, but when we
were fairly out on the Bay, such as had only their coats were suffering with
the cold, and sought the shelter of the pilot’s house and the warmth of
the chimney. But when we approached the harbor of Provincetown, I was surprised
to perceive what an influence that low and narrow strip of sand, only a mile or
two in width, had over the temperature of the air for many miles around. We
penetrated into a sultry atmosphere where our thin coats were once more in
fashion, and found the inhabitants sweltering.</p>
<p>Leaving far on one side Manomet Point in Plymouth and the Scituate shore, after
being out of sight of land for an hour or two, for it was rather hazy, we
neared the Cohasset Rocks again at Minot’s Ledge, and saw the great
Tupelo-tree on the edge of Scituate, which lifts its dome, like an
umbelliferous plant, high over the surrounding forest, and is conspicuous for
many miles over land and water. Here was the new iron light-house, then
unfinished, in the shape of an egg-shell painted red, and placed high on iron
pillars, like the ovum of a sea monster floating on the waves,—destined
to be phosphorescent. As we passed it at half-tide we saw the spray tossed up
nearly to the shell. A man was to live in that egg-shell day and night, a mile
from the shore. When I passed it the next summer it was finished and two men
lived in it, and a light-house keeper said that they told him that in a recent
gale it had rocked so as to shake the plates off the table. Think of making
your bed thus in the crest of a breaker! To have the waves, like a pack of
hungry wolves, eying you always, night and day, and from time to time making a
spring at you, almost sure to have you at last. And not one of all those
voyagers can come to your relief,—but when your light goes out, it will
be a sign that the light of your life has gone out also. What a place to
compose a work on breakers! This light-house was the cynosure of all eyes.
Every passenger watched it for half an hour at least; yet a colored cook
belonging to the boat, whom I had seen come out of his quarters several times
to empty his dishes over the side with a flourish, chancing to come out just as
we were abreast of this light, and not more than forty rods from it, and were
all gazing at it, as he drew back his arm, caught sight of it, and with
surprise exclaimed, “What’s that?” He had been employed on
this boat for a year, and passed this light every weekday, but as he had never
chanced to empty his dishes just at that point, had never seen it before. To
look at lights was the pilot’s business; he minded the kitchen fire. It
suggested how little some who voyaged round the world could manage to see. You
would almost as easily believe that there are men who never yet chanced to come
out at the right time to see the sun. What avails it though a light be placed
on the top of a hill, if you spend all your life directly under the hill? It
might as well be under a bushel. This light-house, as is well known, was swept
away in a storm in April, 1851, and the two men in it, and the next morning not
a vestige of it was to be seen from the shore.</p>
<p>A Hull man told me that he helped set up a white-oak pole on Minot’s
Ledge some years before. It was fifteen inches in diameter, forty-one feet
high, sunk four feet in the rock, and was secured by four guys,—but it
stood only one year. Stone piled up cob-fashion near the same place stood eight
years.</p>
<p>When I crossed the Bay in the <i>Melrose</i> in July, we hugged the Scituate
shore as long as possible, in order to take advantage of the wind. Far out on
the Bay (off this shore) we scared up a brood of young ducks, probably black
ones, bred hereabouts, which the packet had frequently disturbed in her trips.
A townsman, who was making the voyage for the first time, walked slowly round
into the rear of the helmsman, when we were in the middle of the Bay, and
looking out over the sea, before he sat down there, remarked with as much
originality as was possible for one who used a borrowed expression, “This
is a great country.” He had been a timber merchant, and I afterwards saw
him taking the diameter of the mainmast with his stick, and estimating its
height. I returned from the same excursion in the <i>Olata</i>, a very handsome
and swift-sailing yacht, which left Provincetown at the same time with two
other packets, the <i>Melrose</i> and <i>Frolic</i>. At first there was
scarcely a breath of air stirring, and we loitered about Long Point for an hour
in company,—with our heads over the rail watching the great sand-circles
and the fishes at the bottom in calm water fifteen feet deep. But after
clearing the Cape we rigged a flying-jib, and, as the Captain had prophesied,
soon showed our consorts our heels. There was a steamer six or eight miles
northward, near the Cape, towing a large ship toward Boston. Its smoke
stretched perfectly horizontal several miles over the sea, and by a sudden
change in its direction, warned us of a change in the wind before we felt it.
The steamer appeared very far from the ship, and some young men who had
frequently used the Captain’s glass, but did not suspect that the vessels
were connected, expressed surprise that they kept about the same distance apart
for so many hours. At which the Captain dryly remarked, that probably they
would never get any nearer together. As long as the wind held we kept pace with
the steamer, but at length it died away almost entirely, and the flying-jib did
all the work. When we passed the light-boat at Minot’s Ledge, the
<i>Melrose</i> and <i>Frolic</i> were just visible ten miles astern.</p>
<p>Consider the islands bearing the names of all the saints, bristling with forts
like chestnuts-burs, or <i>echinidæ</i>, yet the police will not let a couple
of Irishmen have a private sparring-match on one of them, as it is a government
monopoly; all the great seaports are in a boxing attitude, and you must sail
prudently between two tiers of stony knuckles before you come to feel the
warmth of their breasts.</p>
<p>The Bermudas are said to have been discovered by a Spanish ship of that name
which was wrecked on them, “which till then,” says Sir John Smith,
“for six thousand years had been nameless.” The English did not
stumble upon them in their first voyages to Virginia; and the first Englishman
who was ever there was wrecked on them in 1593. Smith says, “No place
known hath better walls nor a broader ditch.” Yet at the very first
planting of them with some sixty persons, in 1612, the first Governor, the same
year, “built and laid the foundation of eight or nine forts.” To be
ready, one would say, to entertain the first ship’s company that should
be next shipwrecked on to them. It would have been more sensible to have built
as many “Charity-houses.” These are the vexed Bermoothees.</p>
<p>Our great sails caught all the air there was, and our low and narrow hull
caused the least possible friction. Coming up the harbor against the stream we
swept by everything. Some young men returning from a fishing excursion came to
the side of their smack, while we were thus steadily drawing by them, and,
bowing, observed, with the best possible grace, “We give it up.”
Yet sometimes we were nearly at a standstill. The sailors watched (two) objects
on the shore to ascertain whether we advanced or receded. In the harbor it was
like the evening of a holiday. The Eastern steamboat passed us with music and a
cheer, as if they were going to a ball, when they might be going
to—Davy’s locker.</p>
<p>I heard a boy telling the story of Nix’s mate to some girls as we passed
that spot. That was the name of a sailor hung there, he said.—“If I
am guilty, this island will remain; but if I am innocent it will be washed
away,” and now it is all washed away!</p>
<p>Next (?) came the fort on George’s Island. These are bungling
contrivances: not our <i>fortes</i> but our <i>foibles</i>. Wolfe sailed by the
strongest fort in North America in the dark, and took it.</p>
<p>I admired the skill with which the vessel was at last brought to her place in
the dock, near the end of Long Wharf. It was candle-light, and my eyes could
not distinguish the wharves jutting out towards us, but it appeared like an
even line of shore densely crowded with shipping. You could not have guessed
within a quarter of a mile of Long Wharf. Nevertheless, we were to be blown to
a crevice amid them,—steering right into the maze. Down goes the
mainsail, and only the jib draws us along. Now we are within four rods of the
shipping, having already dodged several outsiders; but it is still only a maze
of spars, and rigging, and hulls,—not a crack can be seen. Down goes the
jib, but still we advance. The Captain stands aft with one hand on the tiller,
and the other holding his night-glass,—his son stands on the bowsprit
straining his eyes,—the passengers feel their hearts halfway to their
mouths, expecting a crash. “Do you see any room there?” asks the
Captain, quietly. He must make up his mind in five seconds, else he will carry
away that vessel’s bowsprit, or lose his own. “Yes, sir, here is a
place for us”; and in three minutes more we are fast to the wharf in a
little gap between two bigger vessels.</p>
<p>And now we were in Boston. Whoever has been down to the end of Long Wharf, and
walked through Quincy Market, has seen Boston.</p>
<p>Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Charleston, New Orleans, and the rest, are the
names of wharves projecting into the sea (surrounded by the shops and dwellings
of the merchants), good places to take in and to discharge a cargo (to land the
products of other climes and load the exports of our own). I see a great many
barrels and fig-drums,—piles of wood for umbrella-sticks,—blocks of
granite and ice,—great heaps of goods, and the means of packing and
conveying them,—much wrapping-paper and twine,—many crates and
hogsheads and trucks,—and that is Boston. The more barrels, the more
Boston. The museums and scientific societies and libraries are accidental. They
gather around the sands to save carting. The wharf-rats and customhouse
officers, and broken-down poets, seeking a fortune amid the barrels. Their
better or worse lyceums, and preachings, and doctorings, these, too, are
accidental, and the malls of commons are always small potatoes. When I go to
Boston, I naturally go straight through the city (taking the Market in my way),
down to the end of Long Wharf, and look off, for I have no cousins in the back
alleys,—and there I see a great many countrymen in their shirt-sleeves
from Maine, and Pennsylvania, and all along shore and in shore, and some
foreigners beside, loading and unloading and steering their teams about, as at
a country fair.</p>
<p>When we reached Boston that October, I had a gill of Provincetown sand in my
shoes, and at Concord there was still enough left to sand my pages for many a
day; and I seemed to hear the sea roar, as if I lived in a shell, for a week
afterward.</p>
<p>The places which I have described may seem strange and remote to my
townsmen,—indeed, from Boston to Provincetown is twice as far as from
England to France; yet step into the cars, and in six hours you may stand on
those four planks, and see the Cape which Gosnold is said to have discovered,
and which I have so poorly described. If you had started when I first advised
you, you might have seen our tracks in the sand, still fresh, and reaching all
the way from the Nauset Lights to Race Point, some thirty miles,—for at
every step we made an impression on the Cape, though we were not aware of it,
and though our account may have made no impression on your minds. But what is
our account? In it there is no roar, no beach-birds, no tow-cloth.</p>
<p>We often love to think now of the life of men on beaches,—at least in
midsummer, when the weather is serene; their sunny lives on the sand, amid the
beach-grass and the bayberries, their companion a cow, their wealth a jag of
driftwood or a few beach-plums, and their music the surf and the peep of the
beach-bird.</p>
<p>We went to see the Ocean, and that is probably the best place of all our coast
to go to. If you go by water, you may experience what it is to leave and to
approach these shores; you may see the Stormy Petrel by the way,
θαλασσοδρόμα,
running over the sea, and if the weather is but a little thick,
may lose sight of the land in mid-passage. I do not know where there is another
beach in the Atlantic States, attached to the mainland, so long, and at the
same time so straight, and completely uninterrupted by creeks or coves or
fresh-water rivers or marshes; for though there may be clear places on the map,
they would probably be found by the foot traveller to be intersected by creeks
and marshes; certainly there is none where there is a double way, such as I
have described, a beach and a bank, which at the same time shows you the land
and the sea, and part of the time two seas. The Great South Beach of Long
Island, which I have since visited, is longer still without an inlet, but it is
literally a mere sand-bar, exposed, several miles from the Island, and not the
edge of a continent wasting before the assaults of the Ocean. Though wild and
desolate, as it wants the bold bank, it possesses but half the grandeur of Cape
Cod in my eyes, nor is the imagination contented with its southern aspect. The
only other beaches of great length on our Atlantic coast, which I have heard
sailors speak of, are those of Barnegat on the Jersey shore, and Currituck
between Virginia and North Carolina; but these, like the last, are low and
narrow sandbars, lying off the coast, and separated from the mainland by
lagoons. Besides, as you go farther south, the tides are feebler, and cease to
add variety and grandeur to the shore. On the Pacific side of our country also
no doubt there is good walking to be found; a recent writer and dweller there
tells us that “the coast from Cape Disappointment (or the Columbia River)
to Cape Flattery (at the Strait of Juan de Fuca) is nearly north and south, and
can be travelled almost its entire length on a beautiful sand-beach,”
with the exception of two bays, four or five rivers, and a few points jutting
into the sea. The common shell-fish found there seem to be often of
corresponding types, if not identical species, with those of Cape Cod. The
beach which I have described, however, is not hard enough for carriages, but
must be explored on foot. When one carriage has passed along, a following one
sinks deeper still in its rut. It has at present no name any more than fame.
That portion south of Nauset Harbor is commonly called Chatham Beach. The part
in Eastham is called Nauset Beach, and off Wellfleet and Truro the Back-side,
or sometimes, perhaps, Cape Cod Beach. I think that part which extends without
interruption from Nauset Harbor to Race Point should be called Cape Cod Beach,
and do so speak of it.</p>
<p>One of the most attractive points for visitors is in the northeast part of
Wellfleet, where accommodations (I mean for men and women of tolerable health
and habits) could probably be had within half a mile of the sea-shore. It best
combines the country and the seaside. Though the Ocean is out of sight, its
faintest murmur is audible, and you have only to climb a hill to find yourself
on its brink. It is but a step from the glassy surface of the Herring Ponds to
the big Atlantic Pond where the waves never cease to break. Or perhaps the
Highland Light in Truro may compete with this locality, for there, there is a
more uninterrupted view of the Ocean and the Bay, and in the summer there is
always some air stirring on the edge of the bank there, so that the inhabitants
know not what hot weather is. As for the view, the keeper of the light, with
one or more of his family, walks out to the edge of the bank after every meal
to look off, just as if they had not lived there all their days. In short, it
will wear well. And what picture will you substitute for that, upon your walls?
But ladies cannot get down the bank there at present without the aid of a block
and tackle.</p>
<p>Most persons visit the sea-side in warm weather, when fogs are frequent, and
the atmosphere is wont to be thick, and the charm of the sea is to some extent
lost. But I suspect that the fall is the best season, for then the atmosphere
is more transparent, and it is a greater pleasure to look out over the sea. The
clear and bracing air, and the storms of autumn and winter even, are necessary
in order that we may get the impression which the sea is calculated to make. In
October, when the weather is not intolerably cold, and the landscape wears its
autumnal tints, such as, methinks, only a Cape Cod landscape ever wears,
especially if you have a storm during your stay,—that I am convinced is
the best time to visit this shore. In autumn, even in August, the thoughtful
days begin, and we can walk anywhere with profit. Beside, an outward cold and
dreariness, which make it necessary to seek shelter at night, lend a spirit of
adventure to a walk.</p>
<p>The time must come when this coast will be a place of resort for those
New-Englanders who really wish to visit the sea-side. At present it is wholly
unknown to the fashionable world, and probably it will never be agreeable to
them. If it is merely a ten-pin alley, or a circular railway, or an ocean of
mint-julep, that the visitor is in search of,—if he thinks more of the
wine than the brine, as I suspect some do at Newport,—I trust that for a
long time he will be disappointed here. But this shore will never be more
attractive than it is now. Such beaches as are fashionable are here made and
unmade in a day, I may almost say, by the sea shifting its sands. Lynn and
Nantasket! this bare and bended arm it is that makes the bay in which they lie
so snugly. What are springs and waterfalls? Here is the spring of springs, the
waterfall of waterfalls. A storm in the fall or winter is the time to visit it;
a light-house or a fisherman’s hut the true hotel. A man may stand there
and put all America behind him.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-9" id="linknote-9"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-9">[1]</SPAN>
It is remarkable that the first, if not the only, part of New England which
Cartier saw was Vermont (he also saw the mountains of New York), from Montreal
Mountain, in 1535, sixty-seven years before Gosnold saw Cape Cod. <i>If seeing
is discovering</i>,—and that is <i>all</i> that it is proved that Cabot
knew of the coast of the United States,—then Cartier (to omit Verrazani
and Gomez) was the discoverer of New England rather than Gosnold, who is
commonly so styled.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="linknote-10" id="linknote-10"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#linknoteref-10">[2]</SPAN>
“Savage Rock,” which some have supposed to be, from the name,
the <i>Salvages</i>, a ledge about two miles off Rockland, Cape Ann, was
probably the <i>Nubble</i>, a large, high rock near the shore, on the east side
of York Harbor, Maine. The first land made by Gosnold is presumed by
experienced navigators to be Cape Elizabeth, on the same coast. (See
Babson’s History of Gloucester, Massachusetts.)</p>
<p>The University Press, Cambridge, U. S. A.</p>
<SPAN name="endofbook"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />