<SPAN name="II"></SPAN>
<h2>II</h2>
<h2><b>JANE AUSTEN: NATURAL HISTORIAN</b></h2>
<p>Jane Austen has often been praised as a natural historian. She is a
naturalist among tame animals. She does not study man (as Dostoevsky
does) in his wild state before he has been domesticated. Her men and
women are essentially men and women of the fireside.</p>
<p>Nor is Jane Austen entirely a realist in her treatment even of
these.
She idealizes them to the point of making most of them good-looking,
and
she hates poverty to such a degree that she seldom can endure to write
about anybody who is poor. She is not happy in the company of a
character who has not at least a thousand pounds. "People get so
horridly poor and economical in this part of the world," she writes on
one occasion, "that I have no patience with them. Kent is the only
place
for happiness; everybody is rich there." Her novels do not introduce us
to the most exalted levels of the aristocracy. They provide us,
however,
with a natural history of county people and of people who are just
below
the level of county people and live in the eager hope of being taken
notice of by them. There is more caste snobbishness, I think, in Jane
Austen's novels than in any other fiction of equal genius. She, far
more
than Thackeray, is the novelist of snobs.</p>
<p>How far Jane Austen herself shared the social prejudices of her
characters it is not easy to say. Unquestionably, she satirized them.
At
the same time, she imputes the sense of superior rank not only to her
butts, but to her heroes and heroines, as no other novelist has ever
done. Emma Woodhouse lamented the deficiency of this sense in Frank
Churchill. "His indifference to a confusion of rank," she thought,
"bordered too much on inelegance of mind." Mr. Darcy, again, even when
he melts so far as to become an avowed lover, neither forgets his
social
position, nor omits to talk about it. "His sense of her inferiority, of
its being a degradation ... was dwelt on with a warmth which seemed due
to the consequence he was wounding, but was very unlikely to recommend
his suit." On discovering, to his amazement, that Elizabeth is offended
rather than overwhelmed by his condescension, he defends himself
warmly.
"Disguise of every sort," he declares, "is my abhorrence. Nor am I
ashamed of the feelings I related. They were natural and just. Could
you
expect me to rejoice in the inferiority of your connections? To
congratulate myself on the hope of relations whose condition in life is
so decidedly beneath my own?"</p>
<p>It is perfectly true that Darcy and Emma Woodhouse are the butts of
Miss
Austen as well as being among her heroes and heroines. She mocks
them—Darcy especially—no less than she admires. She loves to let her
wit play about the egoism of social caste. She is quite merciless in
deriding, it when it becomes overbearing, as in Lady Catherine de
Bourgh, or when it produces flunkeyish reactions, as in Mr. Collins.
But
I fancy she liked a modest measure of it. Most people do. Jane Austen,
in writing so much about the sense of family and position, chose as her
theme one of the most widespread passions of civilized human nature.</p>
<p>She was herself a clergyman's daughter. She was the seventh of a
family
of eight, born in the parsonage at Steventon, in Hampshire. Her life
seems to have been far from exciting. Her father, like the clergy in
her
novels, was a man of leisure—of so much leisure, as Mr. Cornish reminds
us, that he was able to read out Cowper to his family in the mornings.
Jane was brought up to be a young lady of leisure. She learned French
and Italian and sewing: she was "especially great in satin-stitch." She
excelled at the game of spillikins.</p>
<p>She must have begun to write at an early age. In later life, she
urges
an ambitious niece, aged twelve, to give up writing till she is
sixteen,
adding that "she had herself often wished she had read more and written
less in the corresponding years of her life." She was only twenty when
she began to write <i>First Impressions</i>, the perfect book which
was not
published till seventeen years later with the title altered to <i>Pride
and Prejudice</i>. She wrote secretly for many years. Her family knew
of
it, but the world did not—not even the servants or the visitors to the
house. She used to hide the little sheets of paper on which she was
writing when any one approached. She had not, apparently, a room to
herself, and must have written under constant threat of interruption.
She objected to having a creaking door mended on one occasion, because
she knew by it when any one was coming.</p>
<p>She got little encouragement to write. <i>Pride and Prejudice</i>
was offered
to a publisher in 1797: he would not even read it. <i>Northanger Abbey</i>
was written in the next two years. It was not accepted by a publisher,
however, till 1803; and he, having paid ten pounds for it, refused to
publish it. One of Miss Austen's brothers bought back the manuscript at
the price at which it had been sold twelve or thirteen years later; but
even then it was not published till 1818, when the author was dead.</p>
<p>The first of her books to appear was <i>Sense and Sensibility</i>.
She had
begun to write it immediately after finishing <i>Pride and Prejudice</i>.
It
was published in 1811, a good many years later, when Miss Austen was
thirty-six years old. The title-page merely said that it was written
"By
a Lady." The author never put her name to any of her books. For an
anonymous first novel, it must be admitted, <i>Sense and Sensibility</i>
was
not unsuccessful. It brought Miss Austen £150—"a prodigious
recompense," she thought, "for that which had cost her nothing." The
fact, however, that she had not earned more than £700 from her
novels by
the time of her death shows that she never became a really popular
author in her lifetime.</p>
<p>She was rewarded as poorly in credit as in cash, though the Prince
Regent became an enthusiastic admirer of her books, and kept a set of
them in each of his residences. It was the Prince Regent's librarian,
the Rev. J.S. Clarke, who, on becoming chaplain to Prince Leopold of
Saxe-Coburg, made the suggestion to her that "an historical romance,
illustrative of the history of the august House of Coburg, would just
now be very interesting." Mr. Collins, had he been able to wean himself
from Fordyce's <i>Sermons</i> so far as to allow himself to take an
interest
in fiction, could hardly have made a proposal more exquisitely
grotesque. One is glad the proposal was made, however, not only for its
own sake, but because it drew an admirable reply from Miss Austen on
the
nature of her genius. "I could not sit seriously down," she declared,
"to write a serious romance under any other motive than to save my
life;
and, if it were indispensable for me to keep it up, and never relax
into
laughing at myself or at other people, I am sure I should be hung
before
I had finished the first chapter."</p>
<p>Jane Austen knew herself for what she was, an inveterate laugher.
She
belonged essentially to the eighteenth century—the century of the wits.
She enjoyed the spectacle of men and women making fools of themselves,
and she did not hide her enjoyment under a pretence of unobservant
good-nature. She observed with malice. It is tolerably certain that
Miss
Mitford was wrong in accepting the description of her in private life
as
"perpendicular, precise, taciturn, a poker of whom every one is
afraid."
Miss Austen, one is sure, was a lady of good-humour, as well as a
novelist of good-humour; but the good-humour had a flavour. It was the
good-humour of the satirist, not of the sentimentalizer. One can
imagine
Jane Austen herself speaking as Elizabeth Bennet once spoke to her
monotonously soft-worded sister. "That is the most unforgiving speech,"
she said, "that I ever heard you utter. Good girl!"</p>
<p>Miss Austen has even been accused of irreverence, and we
occasionally
find her in her letters as irreverent in the presence of death as Mr.
Shaw. "Only think," she writes in one letter—a remark she works into a
chapter of <i>Emma</i>, by the way—"of Mrs. Holder being dead! Poor
woman,
she has done the only thing in the world she could possibly do to make
one cease to abuse her." And on another occasion she writes: "Mrs.
Hall,
of Sherborne, was brought to bed yesterday of a dead child, some weeks
before she expected, owing to a fright. I suppose she happened unawares
to look at her husband." It is possible that Miss Austen's sense of the
comic ran away with her at times as Emma Woodhouse's did. I do not know
of any similar instance of cruelty in conversation on the part of a
likeable person so unpardonable as Emma Woodhouse's witticism at the
expense of Miss Bates at the Box Hill picnic. Miss Austen makes Emma
ashamed of her witticism, however, after Mr. Knightley has lectured her
for it. She sets a limit to the rights of wit, again, in <i>Pride and
Prejudice</i>, when Elizabeth defends her sharp tongue against Darcy.
"The
wisest and best of men," ... he protests, "may be rendered ridiculous
by
a person whose first object in life is a joke." "I hope I never
ridicule
what is wise or good," says Elizabeth in the course of her answer.
"Follies and nonsense, whims and inconsistencies, <i>do</i> divert me,
I own,
and I laugh at them whenever I can." The six novels that Jane Austen
has
left us might be described as the record of the diversions of a
clergyman's daughter.</p>
<p>The diversions of Jane Austen were, beyond those of most novelists,
the
diversions of a spectator. (That is what Scott and Macaulay meant by
comparing her to Shakespeare.) Or, rather, they were the diversions of
a
listener. She observed with her ears rather than with her eyes. With
her, conversation was three-fourths of life. Her stories are stories of
people who reveal themselves almost exclusively in talk. She wastes no
time in telling us what people and places looked like. She will dismiss
a man or a house or a view or a dinner with an adjective such as
"handsome." There is more description of persons and places in Mr.
Shaw's stage-directions than in all Miss Austen's novels. She cuts the
'osses and comes to the cackle as no other English novelist of the same
eminence has ever done. If we know anything of the setting or character
or even the appearance of her men and women, it is due far more to what
they say than to anything that is said about them. And yet how perfect
is her gallery of portraits! One can guess the very angle of Mr.
Collins's toes.</p>
<p>One seems, too, to be able to follow her characters through the
trivial
round of the day's idleness as closely as if one were pursuing them
under the guidance of a modern realist. They are the most unoccupied
people, I think, who ever lived in literature. They are people in whose
lives a slight fall of snow is an event. Louisa Musgrave's jump on the
Cobb at Lyme Regis produces more commotion in the Jane Austen world
than
murder and arson do in an ordinary novel. Her people do not even seem,
for the most part, to be interested in anything but their opinions of
each other. They have few passions beyond match-making. They are
unconcerned about any of the great events of their time. Almost the
only
reference in the novels to the Napoleonic Wars is a mention of the
prize-money of naval officers. "Many a noble fortune," says Mr.
Shepherd
in <i>Persuasion</i>, "has been made during the war." Miss Austen's
principal
use of the Navy outside <i>Mansfield Park</i> is as a means of
portraying the
exquisite vanity of Sir Walter Elliott—his inimitable manner of
emphasizing the importance of both rank and good looks in the make-up
of a gentleman. "The profession has its utility," he says of the Navy,
"but I should be sorry to see any friend of mine belonging to it." He
goes on to explain his reasons:</p>
<div class="blkquot">
<p>It is in two points offensive to me; I have two strong grounds of
objection to it. First as being the means of bringing persons of
obscure birth into undue distinction, and raising men to honours which
their fathers and grandfathers never dreamt of; and, secondly, as it
cuts up a man's youth and vigour most terribly; a sailor grows older
sooner than any other man.</p>
</div>
<p>Sir Walter complains that he had once had to give place at dinner to
Lord St. Ives, the son of a curate, and "a certain Admiral Baldwin, the
most deplorable-looking personage you can imagine: his face the colour
of mahogany, rough and rugged to the last degree, all lines and
wrinkles, nine grey hairs of a side, and nothing but a dab of powder at
top":</p>
<div class="blkquot">
<p>"In the name of heaven, who is that old fellow?" said I to a friend
of mine who was standing near (Sir Basil Morley). "Old fellow!" cried
Sir Basil, "it is Admiral Baldwin. What do you take his age to be?"
"Sixty," said I, "or perhaps sixty-two." "Forty," replied Sir Basil,
"forty, and no more." Picture to yourselves my amazement; I shall not
easily forget Admiral Baldwin. I never saw quite so wretched an example
of what a sea-faring life can do; but to a degree, I know, it is the
same with them all; they are all knocked about, and exposed to every
climate and every weather, till they are not fit to be seen. It is a
pity they are not knocked on the head at once, before they reach
Admiral Baldwin's age.</p>
</div>
<p>That, I think, is an excellent example of Miss Austen's genius for
making her characters talk. Luckily, conversation was still formal in
her day, and it was as possible for her as for Congreve to make
middling
men and women talk first-rate prose. She did more than this, however.
She was the first English novelist before Meredith to portray charming
women with free personalities. Elizabeth Bennet and Emma Woodhouse have
an independence (rare in English fiction) of the accident of being
fallen in love with. Elizabeth is a delightful prose counterpart of
Beatrice.</p>
<p>Miss Austen has another point of resemblance to Meredith besides
that
which I have mentioned. She loves to portray men puffed up with
self-approval. She, too, is a satirist of the male egoist. Her books
are
the most finished social satires in English fiction. They are so
perfect
in the delicacy of their raillery as to be charming. One is conscious
in
them, indeed, of the presence of a sparkling spirit. Miss Austen comes
as near being a star as it is possible to come in eighteenth-century
conversational prose. She used to say that, if ever she should marry,
she would fancy being Mrs. Crabbe. She had much of Crabbe's realism,
indeed; but what a dance she led realism with the mocking light of her
wit!</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />