<SPAN name="ch11"><!--Marker--></SPAN>
<h2> CHAPTER XI </h2>
<h3> STARLINGS AND SHEEP-BELLS </h3>
<blockquote>
Starlings' singing—Native and borrowed
sounds—Imitations of sheep-bells—The shepherd on
sheep-bells—The bells for pleasure, not use—A dog
in charge of the flock—Shepherd calling his
sheep—Richard Warner of Bath—Ploughmen singing to
their oxen in Cornwall—A shepherd's loud singing
</blockquote>
<p>The subject of starlings associating with sheep has served to
remind me of something I have often thought when listening to
their music. It happens that I am writing this chapter in a
small village on Salisbury Plain, the time being
mid-September 1909, and that just outside my door there is a
group of old elder-bushes laden just now with clusters of
ripe berries on which the starlings come to feed, filling the
room all day with that never-ending medley of sounds which is
their song. They sing in this way not only when they
sing—that is to say, when they make a serious business
of it, standing motionless and a-shiver on the tiles, wings
drooping and open beak pointing upwards, but also when they
are feasting on fruit—singing and talking and
swallowing elderberries between whiles to wet their whistles.
If the weather is not too cold you will hear this music
daily, wet or dry, all the year round. We may say that of all
singing birds they are most vocal, yet have no set song. I
doubt if they have more than half a dozen to a dozen sounds
or notes which are the same in every individual and their
very own. One of them is a clear, soft, musical whistle,
slightly inflected; another a kissing sound, usually repeated
two or three times or oftener, a somewhat percussive smack;
still another, a sharp, prolonged hissing or sibilant but at
the same time metallic note, compared by some one to the
sound produced by milking a cow into a tin pail—a very
good description. There are other lesser notes: a musical,
thrush-like chirp, repeated slowly, and sometimes rapidly
till it runs to a bubbling sound; also there is a horny
sound, which is perhaps produced by striking upon the edges
of the lower mandible with those of the upper. But it is
quite unlike the loud, hard noise made by the stork; the poor
stork being a dumb bird has made a sort of policeman's rattle
of his huge beak. These sounds do not follow each other; they
come from time to time, the intervals being filled up with
others in such endless variety, each bird producing its own
notes, that one can but suppose that they are imitations. We
know, in fact, that the starling is our greatest mimic, and
that he often succeeds in recognizable reproductions of
single notes, of phrases, and occasionally of entire songs,
as, for instance, that of the blackbird. But in listening to
him we are conscious of his imitations; even when at his best
he amuses rather than delights—he is not like the
mocking-bird. His common starling pipe cannot produce sounds
of pure and beautiful quality, like the blackbird's
"oboe-voice," to quote Davidson's apt phrase: he emits this
song in a strangely subdued tone, producing the effect of a
blackbird heard singing at a considerable distance. And so
with innumerable other notes, calls, and songs—they are
often to their originals what a man's voice heard on a
telephone is to his natural voice. He succeeds best, as a
rule, in imitations of the coarser, metallic sounds, and as
his medley abounds in a variety of little, measured,
tinkling, and clinking notes, as of tappings on a metal
plate, it has struck me at times that these are probably
borrowed from the sheep-bells of which the bird hears so much
in his feeding-grounds. It is, however, not necessary to
suppose that every starling gets these sounds directly from
the bells; the birds undoubtedly mimic one another, as is the
case with mocking-birds, and the young might easily acquire
this part of their song language from the old birds without
visiting the flocks in the pastures.</p>
<p>The sheep-bell, in its half-muffled strokes, as of a small
hammer tapping on an iron or copper plate, is, one would
imagine, a sound well within the starling's range, easily
imitated, therefore specially attractive to him.</p>
<p>But—to pass to another subject—what does the
shepherd himself think or feel about it; and why does he have
bells on his sheep?</p>
<p>He thinks a great deal of his bells. He pipes not like the
shepherd of fable or of the pastoral poets, nor plays upon
any musical instrument, and seldom sings, or even
whistles—that sorry substitute for song; he loves music
nevertheless, and gets it in his sheep-bells; and he likes it
in quantity. "How many bells have you got on your
sheep—it sounds as if you had a great many?" I asked of
a shepherd the other day, feeding his flock near Old Sarum,
and he replied, "Just forty, and I wish there were eighty."
Twenty-five or thirty is a more usual number, but only
because of their cost, for the shepherd has very little money
for bells or anything else. Another told me that he had "only
thirty," but he intended getting more. The sound cheers him;
it is not exactly monotonous, owing to the bells being of
various sizes and also greatly varying in thickness, so that
they produce different tones, from the sharp tinkle-tinkle of
the smallest to the sonorous klonk-klonk of the big, copper
bell. Then, too, they are differently agitated, some quietly
when the sheep are grazing with heads down, others rapidly as
the animal walks or trots on; and there are little bursts or
peals when a sheep shakes its head, all together producing a
kind of rude harmony—a music which, like that of
bagpipes or of chiming church-bells, heard from a distance,
is akin to natural music and accords with rural scenes.</p>
<p>As to use, there is little or none. A shepherd will sometimes
say, when questioned on the subject, that the bells tell him
just where the flock is or in which direction they are
travelling; but he knows better. The one who is not afraid to
confess the simple truth of the matter to a stranger will
tell you that he does not need the bells to tell him where
the sheep are or in which direction they are grazing. His
eyes are good enough for that. The bells are for his solace
or pleasure alone. It may be that the sheep like the tinkling
too—it is his belief that they do like it. A shepherd
said to me a few days ago: "It is lonesome with the flock on
the downs; more so in cold, wet weather, when you perhaps
don't see a person all day—on some days not even at a
distance, much less to speak to. The bells keep us from
feeling it too much. We know what we have them for, and the
more we have the better we like it. They are company to us."</p>
<p>Even in fair weather he seldom has anyone to speak to. A
visit from an idle man who will sit down and have a pipe and
talk with him is a day to be long remembered and even to date
events from. "'Twas the month—May, June, or
October—when the stranger came out to the down and
talked to I."</p>
<p>One day, in September, when sauntering over Mere Down, one of
the most extensive and loneliest-looking sheep-walks in South
Wilts—a vast, elevated plain or table-land, a portion
of which is known as White Sheet Hill—I passed three
flocks of sheep, all with many bells, and noticed that each
flock produced a distinctly different sound or effect, owing
doubtless to a different number of big and little bells in
each; and it struck me that any shepherd on a dark night, or
if taken blindfolded over the downs, would be able to
identify his own flock by the sound. At the last of the three
flocks a curious thing occurred. There was no shepherd with
it or anywhere in sight, but a dog was in charge; I found him
lying apparently asleep in a hollow, by the side of a stick
and an old sack. I called to him, but instead of jumping up
and coming to me, as he would have done if his master had
been there, he only raised his head, looked at me, then put
his nose down on his paws again. I am on duty—in sole
charge—and you must not speak to me, was what he said.
After walking a little distance on, I spied the shepherd with
a second dog at his heels, coming over the down straight to
the flock, and I stayed to watch. When still over a hundred
yards from the hollow the dog flew ahead, and the other
jumping up ran to meet him, and they stood together, wagging
their tails as if conversing. When the shepherd had got up to
them he stood and began uttering a curious call, a somewhat
musical cry in two notes, and instantly the sheep, now at a
considerable distance, stopped feeding and turned, then all
together began running towards him, and when within thirty
yards stood still, massed together, and all gazing at him. He
then uttered a different call, and turning walked away, the
dogs keeping with him and the sheep closely following. It was
late in the day, and he was going to fold them down at the
foot of the slope in some fields half a mile away.</p>
<p>As the scene I had witnessed appeared unusual I related it to
the very next shepherd I talked with.</p>
<p>"Oh, there was nothing in that," he said. "Of course the dog
was behind the flock."</p>
<p>I said, "No, the peculiar thing was that both dogs were with
their master, and the flock followed."</p>
<p>"Well, my sheep would do the same," he returned. "That is,
they'll do it if they know there's something good for
them—something they like in the fold. They are very
knowing." And other shepherds to whom I related the incident
said pretty much the same, but they apparently did not quite
like to hear that any shepherd could control his sheep with
his voice alone; their way of receiving the story confirmed
me in the belief that I had witnessed something unusual.</p>
<p>Before concluding this short chapter I will leave the subject
of the Wiltshire shepherd and his sheep to quote a remarkable
passage about men singing to their cattle in Cornwall, from a
work on that county by Richard Warner of Bath, once a
well-known and prolific writer of topographical and other
books. They are little known now, I fancy, but he was great
in his day, which lasted from about the middle of the
eighteenth to about the middle of the nineteenth
century—at all events, he died in 1857, aged
ninety-four. But he was not great at first, and finding when
nearing middle age that he was not prospering, he took to the
Church and had several livings, some of them running
concurrently, as was the fashion in those dark days. His
topographical work included Walks in Wales, in Somerset, in
Devon, Walks in many places, usually taken in a stage-coach
or on horseback, containing nothing worth remembering except
perhaps the one passage I have mentioned, which is as
follows:—</p>
<p>"We had scarcely entered Cornwall before our attention was
agreeably arrested by a practice connected with the
agriculture of the people, which to us was entirely novel.
The farmers judiciously employ the fine oxen of the country
in ploughing, and other processes of husbandry, to which the
strength of this useful animal can be employed"—the
Rev. Richard Warner is tedious, but let us be patient and see
what follows—"to which the strength of this useful
animal can be employed; and while the hinds are thus driving
their patient slaves along the furrows, they continually
cheer them with conversation, denoting approbation and
pleasure. This encouragement is conveyed to them in a sort of
chaunt, of very agreeable modulation, which, floating through
the air from different distances, produces a striking effect
both on the ear and imagination. The notes are few and
simple, and when delivered by a clear, melodious voice, have
something expressive of that tenderness and affection which
man naturally entertains for the companions of his labours,
in a <i>pastoral state</i> of society, when, feeling more
forcibly his dependence upon domesticated animals for
support, he gladly reciprocates with them kindness and
protection for comfort and subsistence. This wild melody was
to me, I confess, peculiarly affecting. It seemed to draw
more closely the link of friendship between man and the
humbler tribes of <i>fellow mortals</i>. It solaced my heart
with the appearance of humanity, in a world of violence and
in times of universal hostile rage; and it gladdened my fancy
with the contemplation of those days of heavenly harmony,
promised in the predictions of eternal truth, when man, freed
at length from prejudice and passion, shall seek his
happiness in cultivating the mild, the benevolent, and the
merciful sensibilities of his nature; and when the animal
world, catching the virtues of its lord and master, shall
soften into gentleness and love; when the wolf"....</p>
<p>And so on, clause after clause, with others to be added,
until the whole sentence becomes as long as a fishing-rod.
But apart from the fiddlededee, is the thing he states
believable? It is a charming picture, and one would like to
know more about that "chaunt," that "wild melody." The
passage aroused my curiosity when in Cornwall, as it had
appeared to me that in no part of England are the domestic
animals so little considered by their masters. The R.S.P.C.A.
is practically unknown there, and when watching the doings of
shepherds or drovers with their sheep the question has
occurred to me, What would my Wiltshire shepherd friends say
of such a scene if they had witnessed it? There is nothing in
print which I can find to confirm Warner's observations, and
if you inquire of very old men who have been all their lives
on the soil they will tell you that there has never been such
a custom in their time, nor have they ever heard of it as
existing formerly. Warner's Tour through Cornwall is dated
1808.</p>
<p>I take it that he described a scene he actually witnessed,
and that he jumped to the conclusion that it was a common
custom for the ploughman to sing to his oxen. It is not
unusual to find a man anywhere singing to his oxen, or
horses, or sheep, if he has a voice and is fond of exercising
it. I remember that in a former book—"Nature in
Downland"—I described the sweet singing of a cow-boy
when tending his cows on a heath near Trotton, in West
Sussex; and here in Wiltshire it amused me to listen, at a
vast distance, to the robust singing of a shepherd while
following his flock on the great lonely downs above
Chitterne. He was a sort of Tamagno of the downs, with a
tremendous voice audible a mile away.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />