<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I.</SPAN><br/><br/> BIRTH AND FAMILY.</h2>
<p>There died in a city of Maine, on the
river Penobscot, late in the year 1881, the
last member of a family which had been
planted in New England a little more than
a hundred years before, by a young tradesman
from the English island of Jersey, and
had here produced one of the most characteristic
American and New English men of
genius whom the world has yet seen. This
lady, Miss Maria Thoreau, was the last
child of John Thoreau, the son of Philip
Thoreau and his wife, Marie le Galais, who,
a hundred years ago, lived in the parish of
St. Helier, in Jersey. This John Thoreau
was born in that parish, and baptized there
in the Anglican church, in April, 1754; he
emigrated to New England about 1773,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</SPAN></span>
and in 1781 married in Boston Miss Jane
Burns, the daughter of a Scotchman of
some estate in the neighborhood of Stirling
Castle, who had emigrated earlier to Massachusetts,
and had here married Sarah
Orrok, the daughter of David Orrok, a Massachusetts
Quaker. Jane (Burns) Thoreau,
the granddaughter of David Orrok, and the
grandmother of Henry David Thoreau, died
in Boston, in 1796, at the age of forty-two.
Her husband, John Thoreau, Sr., removed
from Boston to Concord, in 1800, lived in a
house on the village square, and died there
in 1801. His mother, Marie le Galais, outlived
him a few weeks, dying at St. Helier,
in 1801. Maria Thoreau, granddaughter
and namesake of Marie le Galais, died in
December, 1881, in Bangor, Maine.</p>
<p>From the recollections of this "aunt
Maria," who outlived all her American relatives
by the name of Thoreau, Henry
Thoreau derived what information he possessed
concerning his Jersey ancestors. In
his journal for April 21, 1855, he makes
this entry:—</p>
<div class="blockquot">
<p>"Aunt Maria has put into my hands to-day
for safe-keeping three letters from Peter Thoreau<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</SPAN></span>
(her uncle), directed to 'Miss Elizabeth Thoreau,
Concord, near Boston,' and dated at Jersey, respectively,
July 1, 1801, April 22, 1804, and
April 11, 1806; also a '<em>Vue de la ville de St.
Helier</em>,' accompanying the first letter. The first
is in answer to one from my aunt Elizabeth, announcing
the death of her father (my grandfather).
He states that his mother (Marie (le Galais)
Thoreau) died June 26, 1801, the day before
he received aunt Elizabeth's letter, though not
till after he had heard from another source of
the death of his brother, which was not communicated
to his mother. 'She was in the seventy-ninth
year of her age,' he says, 'and retained her
memory to the last. She lived with my two sisters,
who took the greatest care of her.' He
says that he had written to my grandfather about
his oldest brother (who died about a year before),
but had got no answer,—had written that
he left his children, two sons and a daughter, in
a good way: 'The eldest son and daughter are
both married and have children; the youngest is
about eighteen. I am still a widower. Of four
children I have but two left,—Betsey and Peter;
James and Nancy are both at rest.' He
adds that he sends 'a view of our native town.'</p>
<p>"The second of these letters is sent by the
hand of Captain John Harvey, of Boston, then at
Guernsey. On the 4th of February, 1804, he<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</SPAN></span>
had sent aunt Elizabeth a copy of the last letter
he had written (which was in answer to her second),
since he feared she had not received it.
He says that they are still at war with the French;
that they received the day before a letter from
her 'uncle and aunt Le Cappelain of London;'
complains of not receiving letters, and says, 'Your
aunts, Betsey and Peter join with me,' etc. According
to the third letter (April 11, 1806), he
had received by Capt. Touzel an answer to that
he sent by Capt. Harvey, and will forward this
by the former, who is going <em>via</em> Newfoundland
to Boston. 'He expects to go there every year;
several vessels from Jersey go there every year.'
His nephew had told him, some time before, that
he met a gentleman from Boston, who told him
he saw the sign 'Thoreau and Hayse' there, and
he therefore thinks the children must have kept
up the name of the firm. 'Your cousin John is a
lieutenant in the British service; he has already
been in a campaign on the Continent; he is very
fond of it.' Aunt Maria thinks the correspondence
ceased at Peter's death, because he was the
one who wrote English."</p>
</div>
<p>These memoranda indicate that the grandfather
of Henry Thoreau was the younger
son of a family of some substance in Jersey,
which had a branch in London and a<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</SPAN></span>
grandson in the army that fought under
Wellington against Napoleon; that the
American Thoreau engaged in trade in
Boston, with a partner, and carried on business
successfully for years; and that there
was the same pleasant family feeling in the
English and French Thoreaus that we shall
see in their American descendants. Miss
Maria Thoreau, in answer to a letter of
mine, some years ago, sent me the following
particulars of her ancestry, some of
which repeat what is above stated by her
nephew:—</p>
<div class="blockquot">
<p class="datesig">
"<span class="smcap">Bangor</span>, <em>March 18, 1878</em>.</p>
<p>"<span class="smcap">Mr. Sanborn.</span></p>
<p>"<em>Dear Sir</em>,—In answer to your letter, I
regret that I cannot find more to communicate.
I have no earlier record of my grandparents,
Philippe Thoreau and Marie Le Gallais, than
a certificate of their baptism in St. Helier, Jersey,
written on parchment in the year 1773.
I do not know what their vocation was. My
Father was born in St. Helier in April, 1754,
and was married to Jane Burns in Boston, in
1781. She died in that city in the year 1796,
aged forty-two years. My sister Elizabeth continued
my Father's correspondence with his
brother, Uncle Peter Thoreau, at St. Helier, for<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</SPAN></span>
a number of years after Father's decease, and in
one of his letters he speaks of the death of grandmother,
Marie Le Gallais, as taken place so near
the time intelligence reach'd them of Father's
death, in 1801, it was not communicated to her.
Father removed to Concord in 1800, and died
there, of consumption. I do not know at what
time he emigrated to this country, but have been
told he was shipwreck'd on the passage, and suffered
much. I think he must have left a large
family circle, as Uncle Peter in his letters refers
to aunts and cousins, two of which, aunts Le Cappelain
and Pinkney, resided in London, and a
cousin, John Thoreau, was an officer in the British
army.</p>
<p>"Soon after Father's arrival in Boston, probably,
he open'd a store on Long Wharf, as documents
addressed to 'John Thoreau, merchant,'
appear to signify, and one subsequently purchased
'on King Street, afterward called State
Street.' And now I will remark in passing that
Henry's father was bred to the mercantile line,
and continued in it till failure in business; when
he resorted to pencil-making, and succeeded so
well as to obtain the first medal at the Salem
Mechanics' Fair. I think Henry could hardly
compete with his father in pencil-making, any
more than he, with his peculiar genius and habits,
would have been willing to spend much time<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</SPAN></span>
in such 'craft.' His father left no will, but a
competency, at least, to his family, and what
was done relative to the business after his death
was accomplished by his daughter Sophia. I
mention this to rectify Mr. Page's mistake relating
to Henry.</p>
<p>"And now, as I have written all I can glean
of Father's family, I will turn to the maternal
side, of which it appears, in religious belief, they
were of the Quaker persuasion. But I was sorry
to see, by good old great-great-grandfather Tillet's
will, that slavery was tolerated in those days
in the good State of Massachusetts, and handed
down from generation to generation. My great-grandmother
(Tillet) married David Orrok; her
daughter, Sarah Orrok, married Mr. Burns, a
Scotch gentleman. At what time he came to
this country, or married, I cannot ascertain,
but have often been told, to gain the consent
to it of grandmother's Quaker parents, he was
obliged to doff his rich apparel of gems and ruffles,
and conform to the more simple garb of his
Quaker bride. On a visit to his home in Scotland
he died, in what year is not mentioned.
Before my father's decease, a letter was received
from the executor of grandfather's estate, dated
Stirling, informing him there was property left
to Jane Burns, his daughter in America, 'well
worth coming after.' But Father was too much<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</SPAN></span>
out of health to attend to the getting it; and the
letter, subsequently put into a lawyer's hands
by Brother, then the only heir, was lost.</p>
<p>"It has been said I inherit more of the traits
of my foreign ancestry than any of my family,—which
pleases me. Probably the vivacity of the
French and the superstition of the Scotch may
somewhat characterize me,—which it is to be
hop'd the experience of an octogenarian may
suitably modify. But this is nothing, here nor
there. And now that I have written all that is
necessary, and perhaps more, I will close, with
kind wishes for health and happiness. Yours
respectfully,</p>
<p class="author">
"<span class="smcap">Maria Thoreau</span>."<br/></p>
</div>
<p>It would be hard to compress more family
history into a short letter, and yet leave
it so sprightly in style as this. Of the four
children of Maria Thoreau's brother John
and Cynthia Dunbar,—John, Helen, Henry,
and Sophia,—the two eldest, John and
Helen, were said to be "clear Thoreau,"
and the others, Henry and Sophia, "clear
Dunbar;" though in fact the Thoreau
traits were marked in Henry also. Let us
see, then, who and what were the family of
Henry Thoreau's mother, Cynthia Dunbar,
who was born in Keene, N. H., in 1787.
She was the daughter of Rev. Asa Dunbar,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</SPAN></span>
who was born at Bridgewater, Mass., in
1745; graduated at Harvard College in
1767 (a classmate of Sir Thomas Bernard
and Increase Sumner); preached for a
while at Bedford, near Concord, in 1769,
when he was "a young candidate, newly
begun to preach;" settled in Salem in 1772;
resigned his pastorate in 1779; and removed
to Keene just at the close of the
Revolution, where he became a lawyer, and
died, a little upwards of forty-two, in 1787.
He married before 1775, Miss Mary Jones,
the daughter of Col. Elisha Jones, of Weston,
a man of wealth and influence in his
town, who died in 1776. Mrs. Mary
(Jones) Dunbar long outlived the husband
of her youth; in middle life she married
a Concord farmer, Jonas Minott, whom she
also outlived; and it was in his house that
her famous grandson was born in July,
1817. Mrs. Minott was left a widow for
the second time in 1813, when she was
sixty-five years old, and in 1815 she sent a
petition to the Grand Lodge of Masons in
Massachusetts, which was drawn up and
indorsed by her pastor, Dr. Ripley, of Concord,
and which contains a short sketch<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</SPAN></span>
of Henry Thoreau's maternal grandfather,
from whom he is said to have inherited
many qualities. Mrs. Minott's petition sets
forth "that her first husband, Asa Dunbar,
Esq., late of Keene, N. H., was a native
of Massachusetts; that he was for a number
of years settled in the gospel ministry at
Salem; that afterwards he was a counselor-at-law;
that he was Master of a Lodge of
Free and Accepted Masons at Keene, where
he died; that in the cause of Masonry he
was interested and active; that through
some defection or misfortune of that Lodge
<em>she</em> has suffered loss, both on account of
what was due to him and to her, at whose
house they held their meetings; that in the
settlement of the estate of her late husband,
Jonas Minott, Esq., late of Concord, she
has been peculiarly unfortunate, and become
very much straitened in the means of
living comfortably; that being thus reduced,
and feeling the weight of cares, of
years, and of widowhood to be very heavy,
after having seen better days, she is induced,
by the advice of friends, as well as
her own exigencies, to apply for aid to
the benevolence and charity of the Masonic<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</SPAN></span>
fraternity." At the house of this decayed
gentlewoman, about two years after the
date of this petition, Henry Thoreau was
born. She lived to see him running about,
a sprightly boy, and he remembered her
with affection. One of his earliest recollections
of Concord was of driving in a
chaise with his grandmother along the
shore of Walden Pond, perhaps on the way
to visit her relatives in Weston, and thinking,
as he said afterward, that he should
like to live there.</p>
<p>Ellery Channing, whose life of his friend
Henry is a mine of curious information on
a thousand topics, relevant and irrelevant,
and who often traversed the "old Virginia
road" with Thoreau before the house in
which he was born was removed from its
green knoll to a spot further east, where
it now stands, thus pictures the brown
farm-house and its surroundings: "It was
a perfect piece of our old New England
style of building, with its gray, unpainted
boards, its grassy, unfenced door-yard. The
house is somewhat isolate and remote from
thoroughfares; on the Virginia road, an
old-fashioned, winding, at length deserted<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</SPAN></span>
pathway, the more smiling for its forked
orchards, tumbling walls, and mossy banks.
About it are pleasant sunny meadows, deep
with their beds of peat, so cheering with its
homely, hearth-like fragrance; and in front
runs a constant stream through the centre
of that great tract sometimes called 'Bedford
levels,'—the brook a source of the
Shawsheen River." (This is a branch of
the Merrimac, as Concord River is, but
flows into the main stream through Andover,
and not through Billerica and Lowell,
as the Concord does.) The road on which
it stands, a mile and a half east of the
Fitchburg railroad station, and perhaps a
mile from Thoreau's grave in the village
cemetery, is a by-path from Concord to
Lexington, through the little town of Bedford.
The farm-house, with its fields and
orchard, was a part of Mrs. Minott's "widow's
thirds," on which she was living at
the date of her grandson's birth (July 12,
1817), and which her son-in-law, John
Thoreau, was "carrying on" for her that
year.</p>
<p>Mrs. Minott, a few years before Dr. Ripley's
petition in her behalf, came near having<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</SPAN></span>
a more distinguished son-in-law, Daniel
Webster, who, like the young Dunbars, was
New Hampshire born, and a year or two
older than Mrs. Minott's daughter, Louisa
Dunbar. He had passed through Dartmouth
College a little in love with two or
three of the young ladies of Hanover, and
had returned to his native town of Salisbury,
N. H., when he met in Boscawen,
near by, Miss Louisa, who, like Miss Grace
Fletcher, whom he married a few years
afterward, was teaching school in one of the
New Hampshire towns. Miss Dunbar made
an impression on Webster's heart, always
susceptible, and, had the fates been propitious,
he might have called Henry Thoreau
nephew in after years; but the silken tie
was broken before it was fairly knit. I suspect
that she was the person referred to by
one of Webster's biographers, who says,
speaking of an incident that occurred in
January, 1805: "Mr. Webster, at that time,
had no thought of marrying; he had not
even met the lady who afterward became
his wife. He had been somewhat interested
in another lady, who is occasionally referred
to in his letters, written after he left college,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</SPAN></span>
but who was not either of those whom
he had known at Hanover. But this affair
never proceeded very far, and he had entirely
dismissed it from his mind before he
went to Boston in 1804." In January, 1806,
about the time of his father's death, Webster
wrote to a college friend, "I am not
married, and seriously am inclined to think
I never shall be," though he was then a
humble suitor to Grace Fletcher.</p>
<p>Louisa Dunbar was a lively, dark-haired,
large-eyed, pleasing young lady, who had
perhaps been educated in part at Boscawen,
where Webster studied for college, and afterwards
was a school-teacher there. She
received from him those attentions which
young men give to young ladies without
any very active thoughts of marriage; but
he at one time paid special attentions to
her, which might have led to matrimony,
perhaps, if Webster had not soon after fallen
under the sway of a more fascinating
school-teacher, Miss Grace Fletcher, of Hopkinton,
N. H., whom he first saw at the
door of her little school-house in Salisbury,
not far from his own birthplace. A Concord
matron, a neighbor and friend of the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</SPAN></span>
Dunbars and Thoreaus, heard the romantic
story from Webster's own lips forty years
afterward, as she was driving with him
through the valley of the Assabet: how he
was traveling along a New Hampshire road
in 1805, stopped at a school-house to ask
a question or leave a message, and was
met at the door by that vision of beauty
and sweetness, Grace Fletcher herself, to
whom he yielded his heart at once. From
a letter of Webster's to this Concord friend
(Mrs. Louisa Cheney) I quote this description
of his native region, which has never
been printed:—</p>
<div class="blockquot">
<p class="datesig">
"<span class="smcap">Franklin, N. H.</span>, <em>September 29, '45</em>.</p>
<p>"<span class="smcap">Dear Mrs. Cheney</span>,—You are hardly expecting
to hear from me in this remote region of
the earth. Where I am was originally a part of
Salisbury, the place of my birth; and, having
continued to own my father's farm, I sometimes
make a visit to this region. The house is on the
west bank of Merrimac River, fifteen miles
above Concord (N. H.), in a pleasant valley,
made rather large by a turn in the stream, and
surrounded by high and wooded hills. I came
here five or six days ago, alone, to try the effect
of the mountain air upon my health.</p>
<p>"This is a very picturesque country. The hills<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</SPAN></span>
are high, numerous, and irregular,—some with
wooded summits, and some with rocky heads as
white as snow. I went into a pasture of mine
last week, lying high up on one of the hills, and
had there a clear view of the White Mountains
in the northeast, and of Ascutney, in Vermont,
back of Windsor, in the west; while within these
extreme points was a visible scene of mountains
and dales, lakes and streams, farms and forests.
I really think this region is the true Switzerland
of the United States.</p>
<p>"I am attracted to this particular spot by very
strong feelings. It is the scene of my early
years; and it is thought, and I believe truly,
that these scenes come back upon us with renewed
interest and more strength of feeling as
we find years running over us. White stones,
visible from the window, and close by, mark the
grave of my father, my mother, one brother, and
three sisters. Here are the same fields, the same
hills, the same beautiful river, as in the days of
my childhood. The human beings which knew
them now know them no more. Few are left
with whom I shared either toil or amusement in
the days of youth. But this is melancholy and
personal, and enough of it. One mind cannot
enter fully into the feelings of another in regard
to the past, whether those feelings be joyous or
melancholy, or, which is more commonly the case,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</SPAN></span>
partly both. I am, dear Mrs. Cheney, yours
truly,</p>
<p class="author">
"<span class="smcap">Daniel Webster</span>."<br/></p>
</div>
<p>No doubt the old statesman was thinking,
as he wrote, not only of his father,
Captain Ebenezer Webster ("with a complexion,"
said Stark, under whom he fought
at Bennington, "that burnt gunpowder
could not change"), of his mother and his
brethren, but also of Grace Fletcher,—and
echoing in his heart the verse of Wordsworth:—</p>
<div class="poetry-container"><div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
<span class="i0">"Among thy mountains did I feel<br/></span>
<span class="i2">The joy of my desire;<br/></span>
<span class="i0">And she I cherished turned her wheel<br/></span>
<span class="i2">Beside a cottage fire.<br/></span>
<span class="i0">Thy mornings showed, thy nights concealed,<br/></span>
<span class="i2">The bowers where Lucy played;<br/></span>
<span class="i0">And thine, too, is the last green field<br/></span>
<span class="i2">That Lucy's eyes surveyed."<br/></span></div>
</div></div>
<p>It was no such deep sentiment as this which
Louisa Dunbar had inspired in young Webster's
breast; but he walked and talked
with her, took her to drive in his chaise up
and down the New Hampshire hills, and
no doubt went with her to church and to
prayer-meeting. She once surprised me by
confiding to me (as we were talking about
Webster in the room where Henry Thoreau<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</SPAN></span>
afterwards died, and where there hung
then an engraving by Rowse of Webster's
magnificent head) "that she regarded Mr.
Webster, under Providence, as the means
of her conversion." Upon my asking how,
she said that, in one of their drives,—perhaps
in the spring of 1804,—he had spoken
to her so seriously and scripturally on the
subject of religion that her conscience was
awakened, and she soon after joined the
church, of which she continued through life
a devout member. Her friendship for Mr.
Webster also continued, and in his visits to
Concord, which were frequent from 1843 to
1849, he generally called on her, or she was
invited to meet him at the house of Mr.
Cheney, where, among social and political
topics, Webster talked with her of the old
days at Boscawen and Salisbury.</p>
<p>Cynthia Dunbar, the mother of Henry
Thoreau, was born in Keene, N. H., in
1787, the year that her father died. Her
husband, John Thoreau, who was a few
months younger than herself, was born in
Boston. When Henry Thoreau first visited
Keene, in 1850, he made this remark:
"Keene Street strikes the traveler<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</SPAN></span>
favorably; it is so wide, level, straight,
and long. I have heard one of my relatives
who was born and bred there [Louisa
Dunbar, no doubt] say that you could see
a chicken run across it a mile off." His
mother hardly lived there long enough to
notice the chickens a mile off, but she occasionally
visited her native town after her
marriage in 1812, and a kinswoman (Mrs.
Laura Dunbar Ralston, of Washington, D. C.),
now living, says, "I recollect Mrs.
Thoreau as a handsome, high-spirited woman,
half a head taller than her husband,
accomplished, after the manner of those
days, with a voice of remarkable power and
sweetness in singing." She was fond of
dress, and had a weakness, not uncommon
in her day, for ribbons, which her austere
friend, Miss Mary Emerson (aunt of R. W.
Emerson), once endeavored to rebuke in a
manner of her own. In 1857, when Mrs.
Thoreau was seventy years old, and Miss
Emerson eighty-four, the younger lady
called on the elder in Concord, wearing
bonnet-ribbons of a good length and of a
bright color,—perhaps yellow. During the
call, in which Henry Thoreau was the subject<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</SPAN></span>
of conversation, Miss Emerson kept
her eyes shut. As Mrs. Thoreau and her
daughter Sophia rose to go, the little old
lady said, "Perhaps you noticed, Mrs.
Thoreau, that I closed my eyes during your
call. I did so because I did not wish to
look on the ribbons you are wearing, so unsuitable
for a child of God and a person of
your years."</p>
<p>In uttering this reproof, Miss Emerson
may have had in mind the clerical father
of Mrs. Thoreau, Rev. Asa Dunbar, whom
she was old enough to remember. He was
settled in Salem as the colleague of Rev.
Thomas Barnard, after a long contest which
led to the separation of the First Church
there, and the formation of the Salem
North Church in 1772. The parishioners
of Mr. Dunbar declared their new minister
"admirably qualified for a gospel preacher,"
and he seems to have proved himself a
learned and competent minister. But his
health was infirm, and this fact, as one
authority says, "soon threw him into the
profession of the law, which he honorably
pursued for a few years at Keene."
Whether he went at once to Keene on leaving<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</SPAN></span>
Salem in 1779 does not appear, but he
was practicing law there in 1783, and was
also a leading Freemason. His diary for a
few years of his early life—a faint foreshadowing
of his grandson's copious journals—is
still in existence, and indicates
a gay and genial disposition, such as Mrs.
Thoreau had. His only son, Charles Dunbar,
who was born in February, 1780, and
died in March, 1856, inherited this gaiety
of heart, but also that lack of reverence
and discipline which is proverbial in New
England for "ministers' sons and deacons'
daughters." His nephew said of him, "He
was born the winter of the great snow, and
he died in the winter of another great snow,—a
life bounded by great snows." At the
time of Henry Thoreau's birth, Mrs. Thoreau's
sisters, Louisa and Sarah, and their
brother Charles were living in Concord, or
not far off, and there Louisa Dunbar died
a few years before Mrs. Thoreau. Her
brother Charles, who was two years older
than Daniel Webster, was a person widely
known in New Hampshire and Massachusetts,
and much celebrated by Thoreau in
his journals. At the time of his death, I<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</SPAN></span>
find the following curious entries, in Thoreau's
journal for April 3, 1856:—</p>
<div class="blockquot">
<p>"People are talking about my uncle Charles.
George Minott [a sort of cousin of the Thoreaus]
tells how he heard Tilly Brown once asking
him to show him a peculiar inside lock in wrestling.
'Now, don't hurt me,—don't throw
me hard.' He struck his antagonist inside his
knees with his feet, and so deprived him of his
legs. Edmund Hosmer remembers his tricks in
the bar-room, shuffling cards, etc.; he could do
anything with cards, yet he did not gamble. He
would toss up his hat, twirling it over and over,
and catch it on his head invariably. He once
wanted to live at Hosmer's, but the latter was
afraid of him. 'Can't we study up something?'
he asked. Hosmer asked him into the house,
and brought out apples and cider, and uncle
Charles talked. 'You!' said he, 'I burst the
bully of Haverhill.' He wanted to wrestle,—would
not be put off. 'Well, we won't wrestle
in the house.' So they went out to the yard, and
a crowd got round. 'Come, spread some straw
here,' said uncle Charles,—'I don't want to
hurt him.' He threw him at once. They tried
again; he told them to spread more straw, and
he 'burst' him. Uncle Charles used to say that
he hadn't a single tooth in his head. The fact<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</SPAN></span>
was they were all double, and I have heard that
he lost about all of them by the time he was
twenty-one. Ever since I knew him he could
swallow his nose. He had a strong head, and
never got drunk; would drink gin sometimes,
but not to excess. Did not use tobacco, except
snuff out of another's box, sometimes; was very
neat in his person; was not profane, though vulgar."</p>
</div>
<p>This was the uncle who, as Thoreau said
in "Walden," "goes to sleep shaving himself,
and is obliged to sprout potatoes in a
cellar Sundays in order to keep awake and
keep the Sabbath." He was a humorous,
ne'er-do-weel character, who, with a little
property, no family, and no special regard
for his reputation, used to move about
from place to place, a privileged jester, athlete,
and unprofessional juggler. One of
his tricks was to swallow all the knives and
forks and some of the plates at the tavern
table, and then offer to restore them if the
landlord would forgive him the bill. I remember
this worthy in his old age, an
amusing guest at his brother-in-law's table,
where his nephew plied him with questions.
We shall find him mentioned again, in<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</SPAN></span> connection
with Daniel Webster's friendship
for the Dunbar family.</p>
<p>Thoreau's mother had this same incessant
and rather malicious liveliness that in
Charles Dunbar took the grotesque form
above hinted at. She was a kindly, shrewd
woman, with traditions of gentility and sentiments
of generosity, but with sharp and
sudden flashes of gossip and malice, which
never quite amounted to ill-nature, but
greatly provoked the prim and commonplace
respectability that she so often came in
contact with. Along with this humorous
quality there went also an affectionate earnestness
in her relation with those who depended
on her, that could not fail to be
respected by all who knew the hard conditions
that New England life, even in a favored
village like Concord, then imposed
on the mother of a family, where the outward
circumstances were not in keeping
with the inward aspiration.</p>
<div class="poetry-container"><div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
<span class="i0">"Who sings the praise of woman in our clime?<br/></span>
<span class="i0">I do not boast her beauty or her grace:<br/></span>
<span class="i0">Some humble duties render her sublime,<br/></span>
<span class="i0">She, the sweet nurse of this New England race,<br/></span>
<span class="i0">The flower upon the country's sterile face;<br/></span>
<span class="i0">The mother of New England's sons, the pride<br/></span>
<span class="i0">Of every house where those good sons abide."<br/></span></div>
</div></div>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>Her husband was a grave and silent, but
inwardly cheerful and social person, who
found no difficulty in giving his wife the
lead in all affairs. The small estate he
inherited from his father, the first John
Thoreau, was lost in trade, or by some
youthful indiscretions, of which he had his
quiet share; and he then, about 1823, turned
his attention to pencil-making, which had
by that time become a lucrative business in
Concord. He had married in 1812, and he
died in 1859. He was a small, deaf, and
unobtrusive man, plainly clad, and "minding
his own business;" very much in contrast
with his wife, who was one of the
most unceasing talkers ever seen in Concord.
Her gift in speech was proverbial,
and wherever she was the conversation fell
largely to her share. She fully verified
the Oriental legend, which accounts for the
greater loquacity of women by the fact
that nine baskets of talk were let down from
heaven to Adam and Eve in their garden,
and that Eve glided forward first and secured
six of them. Old Dr. Ripley, a few
years before his death, wrote a letter to his
son, towards the end of which he said, with<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</SPAN></span>
courteous reticence, "I meant to have filled
a page with sentiments. But <em>a kind neighbor</em>,
Mrs. Thoreau, has been here more than
an hour. This letter must go in the mail
to-day." Her conversation generally put a
stop to other occupations; and when at her
table Henry Thoreau's grave talk with others
was interrupted by this flow of speech
at the other end of the board, he would
pause, and wait with entire and courteous
silence, until the interruption ceased, and
then take up the thread of his own discourse
where he had dropped it; bowing to
his mother, but without a word of comment
on what she had said.</p>
<p>Dr. Ripley was the minister of Concord
for half a century, and in his copious manuscripts,
still preserved, are records concerning
his parishioners of every conceivable
kind. He carefully kept even the smallest
scrap that he ever wrote, and among his papers
I once found a fragment, on one side of
which was written a pious meditation, and
on the other a certificate to this effect: "Understanding
that Mr. John Thoreau, now of
Chelmsford, is going into business in that
place, and is about to apply for license to<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</SPAN></span>
retail ardent spirits, I hereby certify that I
have been long acquainted with him, that
he has sustained a good character, and now
view him as a man of integrity, accustomed
to store-keeping, and of correct morals."
There is no date, but the time was about
1818. Chelmsford is a town ten miles north
of Concord, to which John Thoreau had removed
for three years, in the infancy of
Henry. From Chelmsford he went to Boston
in 1821, but was successful in neither
place, and soon returned to Concord, where
he gave up trade and engaged in pencil-making,
as already mentioned.</p>
<p>From that time, about 1823, till his
death in 1859, John Thoreau led a plodding,
unambitious, and respectable life in
Concord village, educating his children, associating
with his neighbors on those terms
of equality for which Concord is famous,
and keeping clear, in a great degree, of the
quarrels, social and political, that agitated
the village. Mrs. Thoreau, on the other
hand, with her sister Louisa and her sisters-in-law,
Sarah, Maria, and Jane Thoreau,
took their share in the village bickerings.
In 1826, when Dr. Lyman Beecher, then of<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</SPAN></span>
Boston, Dr. John Todd, then of Groton, and
other Calvinistic divines succeeded in making
a schism in Dr. Ripley's parish, and drawing
off Trinitarians enough to found a separate
church, the Thoreaus generally seceded,
along with good old Deacon White, whose
loss Dr. Ripley bewailed. This contention
was sharply maintained for years, and was
followed by the antimasonic and antislavery
agitation. In the latter Mrs. Thoreau
and her family engaged zealously, and their
house remained for years headquarters for
the early abolitionists and a place of refuge
for fugitive slaves. The atmosphere of
earnest purpose, which pervaded the great
movement for the emancipation of the
slaves, gave to the Thoreau family an elevation
of character which was ever afterward
perceptible, and imparted an air of dignity
to the trivial details of life. By this time,
too,—I speak of the years from 1836 onward
till the outbreak of the civil war,—the
children of Mrs. Thoreau had reached
an age and an education which made them
noteworthy persons. Helen, the oldest
child, born in 1812, was an accomplished
teacher. John, the elder son, born in 1814<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</SPAN></span>
was one of those lovely and sunny natures
which infuse affection in all who come
within their range; and Henry, with his
peculiar strength and independence of soul,
was a marked personage among the few
who would give themselves the trouble to
understand him. Sophia, the youngest
child, born in 1819, had, along with her
mother's lively and dramatic turn, a touch
of art; and all of them, whatever their accidental
position for the time, were superior
persons. Living in a town where the ancient
forms survived in daily collision or in
friendly contact with the new ideas that
began to make headway in New England
about 1830, the Thoreaus had peculiar opportunities,
above their apparent fortunes,
but not beyond their easy reach of capacity,
for meeting on equal terms the advancing
spirit of the period.</p>
<p>The children of the house, as they grew
up, all became school-teachers, and each
displayed peculiar gifts in that profession.
But they were all something more than
teachers, and becoming enlisted early in the
antislavery cause, or in that broader service
of humanity which "plain living and high<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</SPAN></span>
thinking" imply, they gradually withdrew
from that occupation,—declining the opportunities
by which other young persons,
situated as they then were, rise to worldly
success, and devoting themselves, within limits
somewhat narrow, to the pursuit of lofty
ideals. The household of which they were
loving and thoughtful members (let one be
permitted to say who was for a time domesticated
there) had, like the best families
everywhere, a distinct and individual existence,
in which each person counted for
something, and was not a mere drop in the
broad water-level that American society
tends more and more to become. To meet
one of the Thoreaus was not the same as to
encounter any other person who might happen
to cross your path. Life to them was
something more than a parade of pretensions,
a conflict of ambitions, or an incessant
scramble for the common objects of
desire. They were fond of climbing to the
hill-top, and could look with a broader and
kindlier vision than most of us on the commotions
of the plain and the mists of the
valley. Without wealth, or power, or social
prominence, they still held a rank of their<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</SPAN></span>
own, in scrupulous independence, and with
qualities that put condescension out of the
question. They could have applied to
themselves, individually, and without hauteur,
the motto of the French chevalier:—</p>
<div class="poetry-container"><div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
<span class="i0">"Je suis ni roi, ni prince aussi,<br/></span>
<span class="i0">Je suis le seigneur de Coucy."<br/></span></div>
<div class="stanza">
<span class="i0">"Nor king, nor duke? Your pardon, no;<br/></span>
<span class="i0">I am the master of Thoreau."<br/></span></div>
</div></div>
<p>They lived their life according to their
genius, without the fear of man or of "the
world's dread laugh," saying to Fortune
what Tennyson sings:—</p>
<div class="poetry-container"><div class="poem"><div class="stanza">
<span class="i0">"Turn, Fortune, turn thy wheel with smile or frown,—<br/></span>
<span class="i0">With that wild wheel we go not up nor down;<br/></span>
<span class="i0">Our hoard is little, but our hearts are great.<br/></span>
<span class="i0">Smile, and we smile, the lords of many lands;<br/></span>
<span class="i0">Frown, and we smile, the lords of our own hands,—<br/></span>
<span class="i0">For man is man, and master of his fate."<br/></span></div>
</div></div>
<hr class="chap" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />