<p>§ 28. This question may sometimes be decided by considering the capacity of the persons addressed. A greater grasp of
mind is required for the ready comprehension of thoughts expressed in the direct manner, where the sentences are anywise
intricate. To recollect a number of preliminaries stated in elucidation of a coming idea, and to apply them all to the
formation of it when suggested, demands a good memory and considerable power of concentration. To one possessing these,
the direct method will mostly seem the best; while to one deficient in them it will seem the worst. Just as it may cost
a strong man less effort to carry a hundred-weight from place to place at once, than by a stone at a time; so, to an
active mind it may be easier to bear along all the qualifications of an idea and at once rightly form it when named,
than to first imperfectly conceive such idea and then carry back to it, one by one, the details and limitations
afterwards mentioned. While conversely, as for a boy, the only possible mode of transferring a hundred-weight, is that
of taking it in portions; so, for a weak mind, the only possible mode of forming a compound conception may be that of
building it up by carrying separately its several parts.</p>
<p>§ 29. That the indirect method—the method of conveying the meaning by a series of approximations—is best fitted for
the uncultivated, may indeed be inferred from their habitual use of it. The form of expression adopted by the savage,
as in "Water, give me," is the simplest type of the approximate arrangement. In pleonasms, which are comparatively
prevalent among the uneducated, the same essential structure is seen; as, for instance, in—"The men, they were there."
Again, the old possessive case—"The king, his crown," conforms to the like order of thought. Moreover, the fact that
the indirect mode is called the natural one, implies that it is the one spontaneously employed by the common people:
that is—the one easiest for undisciplined minds.</p>
<p>§ 30. There are many cases, however, in which neither the direct nor the indirect structure is the best; but where an
intermediate structure is preferable to both. When the number of circumstances and qualifications to be included in the
sentence is great, the most judicious course is neither to enumerate them all before introducing the idea to which they
belong, nor to put this idea first and let it be remodeled to agree with the particulars afterwards mentioned; but to do
a little of each. Take a case. It is desirable to avoid so extremely indirect an arrangement as the following:—"We came
to our journey's end, at last, with no small difficulty after much fatigue, through deep roads, and bad weather." Yet to
transform this into an entirely direct sentence would not produce a satisfactory effect; as witness:—"At last, with no
small difficulty, after much fatigue, through deep roads, and bad weather, we came to our journey's end."</p>
<p>§ 31. Dr. Whately, from whom we quote the first of these two arrangements,' proposes this construction:—"At last, after
much fatigue, through deep roads and bad weather, we came, with no small difficulty, to our journey's end." Here it will
be observed that by introducing the words "we came" a little earlier in the sentence, the labour of carrying forward so
many particulars is diminished, and the subsequent qualification "with no small difficulty" entails an addition to the
thought that is very easily made. But a further improvement may be produced by introducing the words "we came" still
earlier; especially if at the same time the qualifications be rearranged in conformity with the principle already
explained, that the more abstract elements of the thought should come before the more concrete. Observe the better
effect obtained by making these two changes:—"At last, with no small difficulty, and after much fatigue, we came,
through deep roads and bad weather, to our journey's end." This reads with comparative smoothness; that is, with less
hindrance from suspensions and reconstructions of thought—with less mental effort.</p>
<p>§ 32. Before dismissing this branch of our subject, it should be further remarked, that even when addressing the most
vigorous intellects, the direct style is unfit for communicating ideas of a complex or abstract character. So long as
the mind has not much to do, it may be well able to grasp all the preparatory clauses of a sentence, and to use them
effectively; but if some subtlety in the argument absorb the attention—if every faculty be strained in endeavouring
to catch the speaker's or writer's drift, it may happen that the mind, unable to carry on both processes at once, will
break down, and allow the elements of the thought to lapse into confusion.</p>
<SPAN name="2H_4_0005"></SPAN>
<h2> iv. The Principle of Economy applied to Figures. </h2>
<p>§ 33. Turning now to consider figures of speech, we may equally discern the same general law of effect. Underlying
all the rules given for the choice and right use of them, we shall find the same fundamental requirement—economy of
attention. It is indeed chiefly because they so well subserve this requirement, that figures of speech are employed. To
bring the mind more easily to the desired conception, is in many cases solely, and in all cases mainly, their object.</p>
<p>§ 34. Let us begin with the figure called Synecdoche. The advantage sometimes gained by putting a part for the whole, is
due to the more convenient, or more accurate, presentation of the idea. If, instead of saying "a fleet of ten ships," we
say "a fleet of ten <i>sail</i>," the picture of a group of vessels at sea is more readily suggested; and is so because the
sails constitute the most conspicuous parts of vessels so circumstanced: whereas the word <i>ships</i> would very likely
remind us of vessels in dock. Again, to say, "<i>All hands</i> to the pumps," is better than to say, "All <i>men</i> to the
pumps," as it suggests the men in the special attitude intended, and so saves effort. Bringing "gray <i>hairs</i> with sorrow
to the grave," is another expression, the effect of which has the same cause.</p>
<p>§ 35. The occasional increase of force produced by Metonymy may be similarly accounted for. "The low morality of <i>the
bar,</i>" <i>is</i> a phrase both more brief and significant than the literal one it stands for. A belief in the ultimate
supremacy of intelligence over brute force, is conveyed in a more concrete, and therefore more realizable form, if we
substitute <i>the pen</i> and <i>the sword</i> for the two abstract terms. To say, "Beware of drinking!" is less effective than to
say, "Beware of <i>the bottle!</i>" and is so, clearly because it calls up a less specific image.</p>
<p>§ 36. The Simile is in many cases used chiefly with a view to ornament, but whenever it increases the <i>force</i> of a
passage, it does so by being an economy. Here in an instance: "The illusion that great men and great events came oftener
in early times than now, is partly due to historical perspective. As in a range of equidistant columns, the furthest off
look the closest; so, the conspicuous objects of the past seem more thickly clustered the more remote they are."</p>
<p>§ 37. To construct by a process of literal explanation, the thought thus conveyed would take many sentences, and the
first elements of the picture would become faint while the imagination was busy in adding the others. But by the help of
a comparison all effort is saved; the picture is instantly realized, and its full effect produced.</p>
<p>§ 38. Of the position of the Simile, it needs only to remark, that what has been said respecting the order of the
adjective and substantive, predicate and subject, principal and subordinate propositions, &c., is applicable here. As
whatever qualifies should precede whatever is qualified, force will generally be gained by placing the simile before the
object to which it is applied. That this arrangement is the best, may be seen in the following passage from the 'Lady of
the Lake';</p>
<p>"As wreath of snow, on mountain breast,<br/>
Slides from the rock that gave it rest,<br/>
Poor Ellen glided from her stay,<br/>
And at the monarch's feet she lay."<br/></p>
<p>Inverting these couplets will be found to diminish the effect considerably. There are cases, however, even where the
simile is a simple one, in which it may with advantage be placed last, as in these lines from Alexander Smith's 'Life
Drama':</p>
<p>"I see the future stretch<br/>
All dark and barren as a rainy sea."<br/></p>
<p>The reason for this seems to be, that so abstract an idea as that attaching to the word "future," does not present
itself to the mind in any definite form, and hence the subsequent arrival at the simile entails no reconstruction of the
thought.</p>
<p>§ 39. Such, however, are not the only cases in which this order is the most forcible. As the advantage of putting the
simile before the object depends on its being carried forward in the mind to assist in forming an image of the object,
it must happen that if, from length or complexity, it cannot be so carried forward, the advantage is not gained. The
annexed sonnet, by Coleridge, is defective from this cause:</p>
<p>"As when a child, on some long winter's night,<br/>
Affrighted, clinging to its grandam's knees,<br/>
With eager wond'ring and perturb'd delight<br/>
Listens strange tales of fearful dark decrees,<br/>
Mutter'd to wretch by necromantic spell;<br/>
Or of those hags who at the witching time<br/>
Of murky midnight, ride the air sublime,<br/>
And mingle foul embrace with fiends of hell;<br/>
Cold horror drinks its blood! Anon the tear<br/>
More gentle starts, to hear the beldame tell<br/>
Of pretty babes, that lov'd each other dear,<br/>
Murder'd by cruel uncle's mandate fell:<br/>
Ev'n such the shiv'ring joys thy tones impart,<br/>
Ev'n so, thou, Siddons, meltest my sad heart."<br/></p>
<p>§ 40. Here, from the lapse of time and accumulation of circumstances, the first part of the comparison is forgotten
before its application is reached, and requires re-reading. Had the main idea been first mentioned, less effort would
have been required to retain it, and to modify the conception of it into harmony with the comparison, than to remember
the comparison, and refer back to its successive features for help in forming the final image.</p>
<p>§ 41. The superiority of the Metaphor to the Simile is ascribed by Dr. Whately to the fact that "all men are more
gratified at catching the resemblance for themselves, than in having it pointed out to them." But after what has been
said, the great economy it achieves will seem the more probable cause. Lear's exclamation—</p>
<p>"Ingratitude! thou marble-hearted fiend,"<br/></p>
<p>would lose part of its effect were it changed into—</p>
<p>"Ingratitude! thou fiend with heart like marble;"<br/></p>
<p>and the loss would result partly from the position of the simile and partly from the extra number of words required.
When the comparison is an involved one, the greater force of the metaphor, consequent on its greater brevity, becomes
much more conspicuous. If, drawing an analogy between mental and physical phenomena, we say, "As, in passing through the
crystal, beams of white light are decomposed into the colours of the rainbow; so, in traversing the soul of the poet,
the colourless rays of truth are transformed into brightly tinted poetry"; it is clear that in receiving the double set
of words expressing the two halves of the comparison, and in carrying the one half to the other, considerable attention
is absorbed. Most of this is saved, however, by putting the comparison in a metaphorical form, thus: "The white light of
truth, in traversing the many sided transparent soul of the poet, is refracted into iris-hued poetry."</p>
<p>§ 42. How much is conveyed in a few words by the help of the Metaphor, and how vivid the effect consequently produced,
may be abundantly exemplified. From 'A Life Drama' may be quoted the phrase—</p>
<p>"I spear'd him with a jest,"<br/></p>
<p>as a fine instance among the many which that poem contains. A passage in the 'Prometheus Unbound,' of Shelley, displays
the power of the metaphor to great advantage:</p>
<p>"Methought among the lawns together<br/>
We wandered, underneath the young gray dawn,<br/>
And multitudes of dense white fleecy clouds<br/>
Were wandering, in thick flocks along the mountains<br/>
<i>Shepherded</i> by the slow unwilling wind."<br/></p>
<p>This last expression is remarkable for the distinctness with which it realizes the features of the scene: bringing the
mind, as it were, by a bound to the desired conception.</p>
<p>§ 43. But a limit is put to the advantageous use of the Metaphor, by the condition that it must be sufficiently simple
to be understood from a hint. Evidently, if there be any obscurity in the meaning or application of it, no economy of
attention will be gained; but rather the reverse. Hence, when the comparison is complex, it is usual to have recourse
to the Simile. There is, however, a species of figure, sometimes classed under Allegory, but which might, perhaps, be
better called Compound Metaphor, that enables us to retain the brevity of the metaphorical form even where the analogy
is intricate. This is done by indicating the application of the figure at the outset, and then leaving the mind to
continue the parallel.' Emerson has employed it with great effect in the first of his I Lectures on the Times':—"The
main interest which any aspects of the Times can have for us is the great spirit which gazes through them, the light
which they can shed on the wonderful questions, What are we, and Whither we tend? We do not wish to be deceived. Here
we drift, like white sail across the wild ocean, now bright on the wave, now darkling in the trough of the sea; but
from what port did we sail? Who knows? Or to what port are we bound? Who knows? There is no one to tell us but such poor
weather-tossed mariners as ourselves, whom we speak as we pass, or who have hoisted some signal, or floated to us some
letter in a bottle from far. But what know they more than we? They also found themselves on this wondrous sea. No; from
the older sailors nothing. Over all their speaking trumpets the gray sea and the loud winds answer, Not in us; not in
Time."</p>
<p>§ 44. The division of the Simile from the Metaphor is by no means a definite one. Between the one extreme in which the
two elements of the comparison are detailed at full length and the analogy pointed out, and the other extreme in which
the comparison is implied instead of stated, come intermediate forms, in which the comparison is partly stated and
partly implied. For instance:—"Astonished at the performances of the English plow, the Hindoos paint it, set it up,
and worship it; thus turning a tool into an idol: linguists do the same with language." There is an evident advantage
in leaving the reader or hearer to complete the figure. And generally these intermediate forms are good in proportion as
they do this; provided the mode of completing it be obvious.</p>
<p>§ 45. Passing over much that may be said of like purport upon Hyperbole, Personification, Apostrophe, &c., let us close
our remarks upon construction by a typical example. The general principle which has been enunciated is, that other
things equal, the force of all verbal forms and arrangements is great, in proportion as the time and mental effort they
demand from the recipient is small. The corollaries from this general principle have been severally illustrated; and it
has been shown that the relative goodness of any two modes of expressing an idea, may be determined by observing which
requires the shortest process of thought for its comprehension. But though conformity in particular points has been
exemplified, no cases of complete conformity have yet been quoted. It is indeed difficult to find them; for the English
idiom does not commonly permit the order which theory dictates. A few, however, occur in Ossian. Here is one:—"As
autumn's dark storms pour from two echoing hills, so towards each other approached the heroes. As two dark streams
from high rocks meet and mix, and roar on the plain: loud, rough, and dark in battle meet Lochlin and Inisfail...As the
troubled noise of the ocean when roll the waves on high; as the last peal of the thunder of heaven; such is noise of the
battle."</p>
<p>§ 46. Except in the position of the verb in the first two similes, the theoretically best arrangement is fully carried
out in each of these sentences. The simile comes before the qualified image, the adjectives before the substantives, the
predicate and copula before the subject, and their respective complements before them. That the passage is open to the
charge of being bombastic proves nothing; or rather, proves our case. For what is bombast but a force of expression too
great for the magnitude of the ideas embodied? All that may rightly be inferred is, that only in very rare cases, and
then only to produce a climax, should all the conditions of effective expression be fulfilled.</p>
<SPAN name="2H_4_0006"></SPAN>
<h2> v. Suggestion as a Means of Economy. </h2>
<p>§ 47. Passing on to a more complex application of the doctrine with which we set out, it must now be remarked, that not
only in the structure of sentences, and the use of figures of speech, may economy of the recipient's mental energy be
assigned as the cause of force; but that in the choice and arrangement of the minor images, out of which some large
thought is to be built up, we may trace the same condition to effect. To select from the sentiment, scene, or event
described those typical elements which carry many others along with them; and so, by saying a few things but suggesting</p>
<p>many, to abridge the description; is the secret of producing a vivid impression. An extract from Tennyson's 'Mariana'
will well illustrate this:</p>
<p>"All day within the dreamy house,<br/>
The door upon the hinges creaked,<br/>
The blue fly sung i' the pane; the mouse<br/>
Behind the mouldering wainscot shrieked,<br/>
Or from the crevice peered about."<br/></p>
<p>§ 48. The several circumstances here specified bring with them many appropriate associations. Our attention is rarely
drawn by the buzzing of a fly in the window, save when everything is still. While the inmates are moving about the
house, mice usually keep silence; and it is only when extreme quietness reigns that they peep from their retreats. Hence
each of the facts mentioned, presupposing numerous others, calls up these with more or less distinctness; and revives
the feeling of dull solitude with which they are connected in our experience. Were all these facts detailed instead of
suggested, the attention would be so frittered away that little impression of dreariness would be produced. Similarly in
other cases. Whatever the nature of the thought to be conveyed, this skilful selection of a few particulars which imply
the rest, is the key to success. In the choice of component ideas, as in the choice of expressions, the aim must be to
convey the greatest quantity of thoughts with the smallest quantity of words.</p>
<p>§ 49. The same principle may in some cases be advantageously carried yet further, by indirectly suggesting some entirely
distinct thought in addition to the one expressed. Thus, if we say, "The head of a good classic is as full of ancient
myths, as that of a servant-girl of ghost stories"; it is manifest that besides the fact asserted, there is an implied
opinion respecting the small value of classical knowledge: and as this implied opinion is recognized much sooner than
it can be put into words, there is gain in omitting it. In other cases, again, great effect is produced by an
overt omission; provided the nature of the idea left out is obvious. A good instance of this occurs in 'Heroes and
Heroworship.' After describing the way in which Burns was sacrificed to the idle curiosity of Lion-hunters—people who
came not out of sympathy, but merely to see him—people who sought a little amusement, and who got their amusement while
"the Hero's life went for it!" Carlyle suggests a parallel thus: "Richter says, in the Island of Sumatra there is a kind
of 'Light-chafers,' large Fire-flies, which people stick upon spits, and illuminate the ways with at night. Persons of
condition can thus travel with a pleasant radiance, which they much admire. Great honour to the Fire-flies! But—!—"</p>
<SPAN name="2H_4_0007"></SPAN>
<h2> vi. The Effect of Poetry explained. </h2>
<p>§ 50. Before inquiring whether the law of effect, thus far traced, explains the superiority of poetry to prose, it will
be needful to notice some supplementary causes of force in expression, that have not yet been mentioned. These are not,
properly speaking, additional causes; but rather secondary ones, originating from those already specified reflex results
of them. In the first place, then, we may remark that mental excitement spontaneously prompts the use of those forms of
speech which have been pointed out as the most effective. "Out with him!" "Away with him!" are the natural utterances of
angry citizens at a disturbed meeting. A voyager, describing a terrible storm he had witnessed, would rise to some such
climax as—"Crack went the ropes and down came the mast." Astonishment may be heard expressed in the phrase—"Never was
there such a sight!" All of which sentences are, it will be observed, constructed after the direct type. Again, every
one knows that excited persons are given to figures of speech. The vituperation of the vulgar abounds with them:
often, indeed, consists of little else. "Beast," "brute," "gallows rogue," "cut-throat villain," these, and other like
metaphors and metaphorical epithets, at once call to mind a street quarrel. Further, it may be noticed that extreme
brevity is another characteristic of passionate language. The sentences are generally incomplete; the particles are
omitted; and frequently important words are left to be gathered from the context. Great admiration does not vent itself
in a precise proposition, as—"It is beautiful"; but in the simple exclamation—"Beautiful!" He who, when reading
a lawyer's letter, should say, "Vile rascal!" would be thought angry; while, "He is a vile rascal!" would imply
comparative coolness. Thus we see that alike in the order of the words, in the frequent use of figures, and in extreme
conciseness, the natural utterances of excitement conform to the theoretical conditions of forcible expression.</p>
<p>§ 51. Hence, then, the higher forms of speech acquire a secondary strength from association. Having, in actual life,
habitually heard them in connection with vivid mental impressions, and having been accustomed to meet with them in the
most powerful writing, they come to have in themselves a species of force. The emotions that have from time to time been
produced by the strong thoughts wrapped up in these forms, are partially aroused by the forms themselves. They create
a certain degree of animation; they induce a preparatory sympathy, and when the striking ideas looked for are reached,
they are the more vividly realized.</p>
<p>§ 52. The continuous use of these modes of expression that are alike forcible in themselves and forcible from their
associations, produces the peculiarly impressive species of composition which we call poetry. Poetry, we shall find,
habitually adopts those symbols of thought, and those methods of using them, which instinct and analysis agree in
choosing as most effective, and becomes poetry by virtue of doing this. On turning back to the various specimens that
have been quoted, it will be seen that the direct or inverted form of sentence predominates in them; and that to a
degree quite inadmissible in prose. And not only in the frequency, but in what is termed the violence of the inversions,
will this distinction be remarked. In the abundant use of figures, again, we may recognize the same truth. Metaphors,
similes, hyperboles, and personifications, are the poet's colours, which he has liberty to employ almost without limit.
We characterize as "poetical" the prose which uses these appliances of language with any frequency, and condemn it as
"over florid" or "affected" long before they occur with the profusion allowed in verse. Further, let it be remarked
that in brevity—the other requisite of forcible expression which theory points out, and emotion spontaneously
fulfils—poetical phraseology similarly differs from ordinary phraseology. Imperfect periods are frequent; elisions are
perpetual; and many of the minor words, which would be deemed essential in prose, are dispensed with.</p>
<p>§ 53. Thus poetry, regarded as a vehicle of thought, is especially impressive partly because it obeys all the laws of
effective speech, and partly because in so doing it imitates the natural utterances of excitement. While the matter
embodied is idealized emotion, the vehicle is the idealized language of emotion. As the musical composer catches the
cadences in which our feelings of joy and sympathy, grief and despair, vent themselves, and out of these germs evolves
melodies suggesting higher phases of these feelings; I so, the poet develops from the typical expressions in which men
utter passion and sentiment, those choice forms of verbal combination in which concentrated passion and sentiment may be
fitly presented.</p>
<p>§ 54. There is one peculiarity of poetry conducing much to its effect—the peculiarity which is indeed usually thought
its characteristic one—still remaining to be considered: we mean its rhythmical structure. This, improbable though it
seems, will be found to come under the same generalization with the others. Like each of them, it is an idealization of
the natural language of strong emotion, which is known to be more or less metrical if the emotion be not too violent;
and like each of them it is an economy of the reader's or hearer's attention. In the peculiar tone and manner we adopt
in uttering versified language, may be discerned its relationship to the feelings; and the pleasure which its measured
movement gives us, is ascribable to the comparative ease with which words metrically arranged can be recognized.</p>
<p>§ 55. This last position will scarcely be at once admitted; but a little explanation will show its reasonableness. For
if, as we have seen, there is an expenditure of mental energy in the mere act of listening to verbal articulations, or
in that silent repetition of them which goes on in reading—if the perceptive faculties must be in active exercise to
identify every syllable—then, any mode of so combining words as to present a regular recurrence of certain traits which
the mind can anticipate, will diminish that strain upon the attention required by the total irregularity of prose. Just
as the body, in receiving a series of varying concussions, must keep the muscles ready to meet the most violent of them,
as not knowing when such may come; so, the mind in receiving unarranged articulations, must keep its perceptives active
enough to recognize the least easily caught sounds. And as, if the concussions recur in a definite order, the body
may husband its forces by adjusting the resistance needful for each concussion; so, if the syllables be rhythmically
arranged, the mind may economize its energies by anticipating the attention required for each syllable.</p>
<p>§ 56. Far-fetched though this idea will perhaps be thought, a little introspection will countenance it. That we do take
advantage of metrical language to adjust our perceptive faculties to the force of the expected articulations, is clear
from the fact that we are balked by halting versification. Much as at the bottom of a flight of stairs, a step more or
less than we counted upon gives us a shock; so, too, does a misplaced accent or a supernumerary syllable. In the one
case, we <i>know</i> that there is an erroneous preadjustment; and we can scarcely doubt that there is one in the other. But
if we habitually preadjust our perceptions to the measured movement of verse, the physical analogy above given renders
it probable that by so doing we economize attention; and hence that metrical language is more effective than prose,
because it enables us to do this.</p>
<p>§ 57. Were there space, it might be worthwhile to inquire whether the pleasure we take in rhyme, and also that which we
take in euphony, axe not partly ascribable to the same general cause.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />