<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN>
<h1>THE TRUMPET-MAJOR<br/> JOHN LOVEDAY</h1>
<p style="text-align: center"><span class="smcap">a soldier in
the war with buonaparte</span><br/>
<span class="smcap">and</span><br/>
ROBERT HIS BROTHER<br/>
<span class="smcap">first mate in the merchant service</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center">A TALE</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><span class="smcap">by</span><br/>
THOMAS HARDY</p>
<h2>PREFACE</h2>
<p>The present tale is founded more largely on
testimony—oral and written—than any other in this
series. The external incidents which direct its course are
mostly an unexaggerated reproduction of the recollections of old
persons well known to the author in childhood, but now long dead,
who were eye-witnesses of those scenes. If wholly
transcribed their recollections would have filled a volume thrice
the length of ‘The Trumpet-Major.’</p>
<p>Down to the middle of this century, and later, there were not
wanting, in the neighbourhood of the places more or less clearly
indicated herein, casual relics of the circumstances amid which
the action moves—our preparations for defence against the
threatened invasion of England by Buonaparte. An outhouse
door riddled with bullet-holes, which had been extemporized by a
solitary man as a target for firelock practice when the landing
was hourly expected, a heap of bricks and clods on a beacon-hill,
which had formed the chimney and walls of the hut occupied by the
beacon-keeper, worm-eaten shafts and iron heads of pikes for the
use of those who had no better weapons, ridges on the down thrown
up during the encampment, fragments of volunteer uniform, and
other such lingering remains, brought to my imagination in early
childhood the state of affairs at the date of the war more
vividly than volumes of history could have done.</p>
<p>Those who have attempted to construct a coherent narrative of
past times from the fragmentary information furnished by
survivors, are aware of the difficulty of ascertaining the true
sequence of events indiscriminately recalled. For this
purpose the newspapers of the date were indispensable. Of
other documents consulted I may mention, for the satisfaction of
those who love a true story, that the ‘Address to all Ranks
and Descriptions of Englishmen’ was transcribed from an
original copy in a local museum; that the hieroglyphic portrait
of Napoleon existed as a print down to the present day in an old
woman’s cottage near ‘Overcombe;’ that the
particulars of the King’s doings at his favourite
watering-place were augmented by details from records of the
time. The drilling scene of the local militia received some
additions from an account given in so grave a work as
Gifford’s ‘History of the Wars of the French
Revolution’ (London, 1817). But on reference to the
History I find I was mistaken in supposing the account to be
advanced as authentic, or to refer to rural England.
However, it does in a large degree accord with the local
traditions of such scenes that I have heard recounted, times
without number, and the system of drill was tested by reference
to the Army Regulations of 1801, and other military
handbooks. Almost the whole narrative of the supposed
landing of the French in the Bay is from oral relation as
aforesaid. Other proofs of the veracity of this chronicle
have escaped my recollection.</p>
<p style="text-align: right">T. H.</p>
<p><i>October</i> 1895.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />