<SPAN name="toc170" id="toc170"></SPAN>
<SPAN name="pdf171" id="pdf171"></SPAN>
<h2><span>Chapter IX. Influence Of Credit On Prices.</span></h2>
<SPAN name="toc172" id="toc172"></SPAN>
<h3><span>§ 1. What acts on prices is Credit, in whatever shape given.</span></h3>
<p>
Having now formed a general idea of the modes in
which credit is made available as a substitute for money, we
have to consider in what manner the use of these substitutes
affects the value of money, or, what is equivalent, the prices
of commodities. It is hardly necessary to say that the permanent
value of money—the natural and average prices of
commodities—are not in question here. These are determined
by the cost of producing or of obtaining the precious
metals. An ounce of gold or silver will in the long run exchange
for as much of every other commodity as can be produced
or imported at the same cost with itself. And an
order, or note of hand, or bill payable at sight, for an ounce
of gold, while the credit of the giver is unimpaired, is worth
neither more nor less than the gold itself.</p>
<p>
It is not, however, with ultimate or average, but with
immediate and temporary prices that we are now concerned.
These, as we have seen, may deviate very widely from the
standard of cost of production. Among other causes of
fluctuation, one we have found to be the quantity of money
in circulation. Other things being the same, an increase of
the money in circulation raises prices; a diminution lowers
them. If more money is thrown into circulation than the
quantity which can circulate at a value conformable to its
cost of production, the value of money, so long as the excess
lasts, will remain below the standard of cost of production,
and general prices will be sustained above the natural rate.</p>
<p>
But we have now found that there are other things, such
as bank-notes, bills of exchange, and checks, which circulate
as money, and perform all the functions of it, and the question
arises, Do these various substitutes operate on prices in
the same manner as money itself? I apprehend that bank-notes,
bills, or checks, as such, do not act on prices at all.
What does act on prices is Credit, in whatever shape given,
and whether it gives rise to any transferable instruments
capable of passing into circulation or not.</p>
<SPAN name="toc173" id="toc173"></SPAN>
<h3><span>§ 2. Credit a purchasing Power, similar to Money.</span></h3>
<p>
Money acts upon prices in no other way than by
being tendered in exchange for commodities. The demand
which influences the prices of commodities consists of the
money offered for them. Money not in circulation has no
effect on prices.</p>
<p>
In the case, however, of payment by checks, the purchases
are, at any rate, made, though not with the money in
the buyer's possession, yet with money to which he has a
right. But he may make purchases with money which he
only expects to have, or even only pretends to expect. He
may obtain goods in return for his acceptances payable at a
future time, or on his note of hand, or on a simple book-credit—that
is, on a mere promise to pay. All these purchases
have exactly the same effect on price as if they were
made with ready money. The amount of purchasing power
which a person can exercise is composed of all the money
in his possession or due to him, and of all his credit. For
exercising the whole of this power he finds a sufficient motive
only under peculiar circumstances, but he always possesses
it; and the portion of it which he at any time does
exercise is the measure of the effect which he produces on
price.</p>
<p>
Suppose that, in the expectation that some commodity
will rise in price, he determines not only to invest in it all
his ready money, but to take up on credit, from the producers
or importers, as much of it as their opinion of his
resources will enable him to obtain. Every one must see
that by thus acting he produces a greater effect on price
than if he limited his purchases to the money he has actually
in hand. He creates a demand for the article to the full
amount of his money and credit taken together, and raises
the price proportionally to both. And this effect is produced,
though none of the written instruments called substitutes
for currency may be called into existence; though the
transaction may give rise to no bill of exchange, nor to the
issue of a single bank-note. The buyer, instead of taking a
mere book-credit, might have given a bill for the amount,
or might have paid for the goods with bank-notes borrowed
for that purpose from a banker, thus making the purchase
not on his own credit with the seller, but on the banker's
credit with the seller, and his own with the banker. Had he
done so, he would have produced as great an effect on price
as by a simple purchase to the same amount on a book-credit,
but no greater effect. The credit itself, not the form and
mode in which it is given, is the operating cause.</p>
<SPAN name="toc174" id="toc174"></SPAN>
<h3><span>§ 3. Great extensions and contractions of Credit. Phenomena of a commercial crisis analyzed.</span></h3>
<p>
The inclination of the mercantile public to increase
their demand for commodities by making use of all or much
of their credit as a purchasing power depends on their expectation
of profit. When there is a general impression
that the price of some commodity is likely to rise from an
extra demand, a short crop, obstructions to importation, or
any other cause, there is a disposition among dealers to increase
their stocks in order to profit by the expected rise.
This disposition tends in itself to produce the effect which
it looks forward to—a rise of price; and, if the rise is considerable
and progressive, other speculators are attracted,
who, so long as the price has not begun to fall, are willing
to believe that it will continue rising. These, by further
purchases, produce a further advance, and thus a rise of
price, for which there were originally some rational grounds,
is often heightened by merely speculative purchases, until it
greatly exceeds what the original grounds will justify. After
a time this begins to be perceived, the price ceases to rise,
and the holders, thinking it time to realize their gains, are
anxious to sell. Then the price begins to decline, the holders
rush into the market to avoid a still greater loss, and,
few being willing to buy in a falling market, the price falls
much more suddenly than it rose. Those who have bought
at a higher price than reasonable calculation justified, and
who have been overtaken by the revulsion before they had
realized, are losers in proportion to the greatness of the fall
and to the quantity of the commodity which they hold, or
have bound themselves to pay for.</p>
<p>
This is the ideal extreme case of what is called a commercial
crisis. There is said to be a commercial crisis when
a great number of merchants and traders at once either have,
or apprehend that they shall have, a difficulty in meeting
their engagements. The most usual cause of this general
embarrassment is the recoil of prices after they have been
raised by a spirit of speculation, intense in degree, and extending
to many commodities. When, after such a rise, the
reaction comes and prices begin to fall, though at first perhaps
only through the desire of the holders to realize, speculative
purchases cease; but, were this all, prices would only
fall to the level from which they rose, or to that which is
justified by the state of the consumption and of the supply.
They fall, however, much lower; for as, when prices were
rising, and everybody apparently making a fortune, it was
easy to obtain almost any amount of credit, so now, when
everybody seems to be losing, and many fail entirely, it is
with difficulty that firms of known solidity can obtain even
the credit to which they are accustomed, and which it is the
greatest inconvenience to them to be without, because all
dealers have engagements to fulfill, and, nobody feeling sure
that the portion of his means which he has intrusted to
others will be available in time, no one likes to part with
ready money, or to postpone his claim to it. To these rational
considerations there is superadded, in extreme cases,
a panic as unreasoning as the previous over-confidence;
money is borrowed for short periods at almost any rate of
interest, and sales of goods for immediate payment are made
at almost any sacrifice. Thus general prices, during a commercial
revulsion, fall as much below the usual level as
during the previous period of speculation they have risen
above it; the fall, as well as the rise, originating not in anything
affecting money, but in the state of credit.</p>
<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 0.90em"><span style="font-size: 90%">
Professor Jevons seriously advanced a theory that, inasmuch
as the harvests of the world were the causes of good or
bad trade, and that their deficiency would regularly be followed
by commercial distress, then a periodic cause of bad
harvests, if found, would explain the constant recurrence of
commercial crises. This cause he claimed to have found in
the sun-spots, which periodically deprive the crops of that
source of growth which is usually furnished by the sun when
no spots appear.</span><SPAN id="noteref_243" name="noteref_243" href="#note_243"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">243</span></span></SPAN><span style="font-size: 90%"> It has not received general acceptance.
</span></p>
<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 0.90em"><span style="font-size: 90%">
In the United States financial disasters have occurred in
1814, 1819, 1825, 1837-1839, 1857, and 1873. Those of 1837
and 1873 seem to have been the most serious in their effects;
but this field, so far as scientific study is concerned, has not
been fully worked, and much remains to be learned about these
crises in the United States. The crisis of 1873 was due to
excessive railway-building. It was testified</span><SPAN id="noteref_244" name="noteref_244" href="#note_244"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">244</span></span></SPAN><span style="font-size: 90%"> concerning the
New York banks in 1873 that </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">their capital needed for legitimate
purposes was practically lent out on certain iron rails,
railroad-ties, bridges, and rolling-stock, </span><em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-size: 90%; font-style: italic">called</span></em><span style="font-size: 90%"> railroads, many
of them laid down in places where these materials were practically
useless.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span></p>
<p class="tei tei-p" style="margin-bottom: 0.90em"><span style="font-size: 90%">
Under the effects due to swift communication by steam,
but especially to the electric telegraph, modern credit is a very
different thing from what it was fifty years ago. Now, a
shock on the Bourse at Vienna is felt the same day at Paris,
London, and New York. A commercial crisis in one great
money-center is felt at every other point in the world which
has business connections with it. Moreover, as Cherbuliez</span><SPAN id="noteref_245" name="noteref_245" href="#note_245"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">245</span></span></SPAN><span style="font-size: 90%">
says: </span><span class="tei tei-q"><span style="font-size: 90%">“</span><span style="font-size: 90%">A country is more subject to crises the more advanced
is its economical development. There are certain maladies
which attack only grown-up persons who have reached a certain
degree of vigor and maturity.</span><span style="font-size: 90%">”</span></span></p>
<SPAN name="toc175" id="toc175"></SPAN>
<h3><span>§ 4. Influence of the different forms of Credit on Prices.</span></h3>
<p>
It does not, indeed, follow that credit <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">will</span></em> be more
used because it <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">can</span></em> be. When the state of trade holds out
no particular temptation to make large purchases on credit,
dealers will use only a small portion of the credit-power,
and it will depend only on convenience whether the portion
which they use will be taken in one form or in another.
One single exertion of the credit-power in the form of (1)
book-credit, is only the foundation of a single purchase; but,
if (2) a bill is drawn, that same portion of credit may serve
for as many purchases as the number of times the bill
changes hands; while (3) every bank-note issued renders
the credit of the banker a purchasing power to that amount
in the hands of all the successive holders, without impairing
any power they may possess of effecting purchases on their
own credit. Credit, in short, has exactly the same purchasing
power with money; and as money tells upon prices
not simply in proportion to its amount, but to its amount
multiplied by the number of times it changes hands, so also
does credit; and credit transferable from hand to hand is in
that proportion more potent than credit which only performs
one purchase.</p>
<p>
There is a form of credit transactions (4) by checks on
bankers, and transfers in a banker's books, which is exactly
parallel in every respect to bank-notes, giving equal facilities
to an extension of credit, and capable of acting on prices quite
as powerfully. A bank, instead of lending its notes to a merchant
or dealer, might open an account with him, and credit
the account with the sum it had agreed to advance, on an
understanding that he should not draw out that sum in any
other mode than by drawing checks against it in favor of
those to whom he had occasion to make payments. These
checks might possibly even pass from hand to hand like
bank-notes; more commonly, however, the receiver would
pay them into the hands of his own banker, and when he
wanted the money would draw a fresh check against it; and
hence an objector may urge that as the original check would
very soon be presented for payment, when it must be paid
either in notes or in coin, notes or coin to an equal amount
must be provided as the ultimate means of liquidation. It
is not so, however. The person to whom the check is transferred
may perhaps deal with the same banker, and the
check may return to the very bank on which it was drawn.</p>
<p>
This is very often the case in country districts; if so, no
payment will be called for, but a simple transfer in the
banker's books will settle the transaction. If the check is
paid into a different bank, it will not be presented for payment,
but liquidated by set-off against other checks; and,
in a state of circumstances favorable to a general extension
of banking credits, a banker who has granted more credit,
and has therefore more checks drawn on him, will also have
more checks on other bankers paid to him, and will only
have to provide notes or cash for the payment of balances;
for which purpose the ordinary reserve of prudent bankers,
one third of their liabilities, will abundantly suffice.</p>
<SPAN name="toc176" id="toc176"></SPAN>
<h3><span>§ 5. On what the use of Credit depends.</span></h3>
<p>
The credit given to any one by those with whom he
deals does not depend on the quantity of bank-notes or coin
in circulation at the time, but on their opinion of his solvency.
If any consideration of a more general character
enters into their calculation, it is only in a time of pressure
on the loan market, when they are not certain of being themselves
able to obtain the credit on which they have been accustomed
to rely; and even then, what they look to is the
general state of the loan market, and not (preconceived theory
apart) the amount of bank-notes. So far, as to the willingness
to <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">give</span></em> credit. And the willingness of a dealer to
<em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">use</span></em> his credit depends on his expectations of gain, that is, on
his opinion of the probable future price of his commodity;
an opinion grounded either on the rise or fall already going
on, or on his prospective judgment respecting the supply
and the rate of consumption. When a dealer extends his
purchases beyond his immediate means of payment, engaging
to pay at a specified time, he does so in the expectation
either that the transaction will have terminated favorably
before that time arrives, or that he shall then be in possession
of sufficient funds from the proceeds of his other transactions.
The fulfillment of these expectations depends upon
prices, but not specially upon the amount of bank-notes.
It is obvious, however, that prices do not depend on money,
but on purchases. Money left with a banker, and not drawn
against, or drawn against for other purposes than buying
commodities, has no effect on prices, any more than credit
which is not used. Credit which <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">is</span></em> used to purchase commodities
affects prices in the same manner as money. Money
and credit are thus exactly on a par in their effect on prices.</p>
<span style="font-size: 90%">
It is often seen, in our large cities, that money is very plentiful,
but no one seems to wish its use (that is, no one with safe
securities). Inability to find investments and to find industries
in which the rate of profit is satisfactory—all of which
depends on the business character and activity of the people—will
prevent credit from being used, no matter how many
bank-notes, or greenbacks, or how much gold there is in the
country. It is impossible to make people invest, simply by increasing
the number of counters by which commodities are
exchanged against each other; that is, by increasing the money.
The reason why more credit is wanted is because men see that
increased production is possible of a kind that will find other
commodities ready to be offered (i.e., demand) in exchange for
that production. Normal credit, therefore, on a healthy basis,
increases and slackens with the activity or dullness of trade.
Speculation, or the wild extension of credit, on the other hand,
is apt to be begotten by a plethora of money, which has induced
low rates for loans, and moves with the uncertain waves
of popular impression. By normal credit we mean that the
wealth represented by the credit is really at the disposal of the
borrowers; in a crisis, the quantity of wealth supposed to be
represented by credit is very much greater than that at the
disposal of the lenders.</span><SPAN id="noteref_246" name="noteref_246" href="#note_246"><span class="tei tei-noteref"><span style="font-size: 60%; vertical-align: super">246</span></span></SPAN>
<SPAN name="toc177" id="toc177"></SPAN>
<h3><span>§ 6. What is essential to the idea of Money?</span></h3>
<p>
There has been a great amount of discussion and
argument on the question whether several of these forms of
credit, and in particular whether bank-notes, ought to be
considered as money. It seems to be an essential part of
the idea of money that it be legal tender. An inconvertible
paper which is legal tender is universally admitted to be
money; in the French language the phrase
<span lang="fr" class="tei tei-foreign" xml:lang="fr"><span style="font-style: italic">papier-monnaie</span></span>
actually <em class="tei tei-emph"><span style="font-style: italic">means</span></em> inconvertibility, convertible notes being merely
<span lang="fr" class="tei tei-foreign" xml:lang="fr"><span style="font-style: italic">billets à porteur</span></span>.
An instrument which would be deprived
of all value by the insolvency of a corporation can
not be money in any sense in which money is opposed to
credit. It either is not money, or it is money and credit too.</p>
<span style="font-size: 90%">
It would seem, from all study of the essentials of money
(</span><SPAN href="#Book_III_Chapter_IV" class="tei tei-ref"><span style="font-size: 90%">Book III, Chapter IV</span></SPAN><span style="font-size: 90%">),
that the necessary part of the idea of
money is that it should have value in itself. No one parts with
valuable commodities for a medium of exchange which does not
possess value; and we have seen that Legislatures can not control
the natural value of even the precious metals by giving
them legal-tender power. Much less could it be done for paper
money. Paper, therefore, may, as an instrument of credit, be
a substitute for money; but, in accordance with the above test,
it can not properly be considered as money in the full sense.
Of course, paper money, checks, etc., perform some of the functions
of money equally well with the precious metals. F. A.
Walker holds that anything is money which performs money-work;
but he excludes checks from his catalogue of things
which may serve as money. It is practically of little importance,
however, what we include under money, so long as its
functions are well understood; it is merely a question of nomenclature,
and need not disturb us.
</span>
<hr class="page" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />