<h2><SPAN name="Page_169"></SPAN>CHAPTER XI.</h2>
<h2>SUSAN B. ANTHONY—<i>Continued</i>.</h2>
<br/>
<p>It was in 1852 that anti-slavery, through the eloquent
lips of such men as George Thompson, Phillips,
and Garrison, first proclaimed to Miss Anthony its pressing
financial necessities. To their inspired words she
gave answer, four years afterward, by becoming a regularly
employed agent in the Anti-slavery Society. For
her espoused cause she has always made boldest demands.
In the abolition meetings she used to tell each
class why it should support the movement financially;
invariably calling upon Democrats to give liberally, as
the success of the cause would enable them to cease
bowing the knee to the slave power.</p>
<p>There is scarce a town, however small, from New
York to San Francisco, that has not heard her ringing
voice. Who can number the speeches she has made
on lyceum platforms, in churches, schoolhouses, halls,
barns, and in the open air, with a lumber wagon or a
cart for her rostrum? Who can describe the varied
audiences and social circles she has cheered and interested?
Now we see her on the far-off prairies, entertaining,
with sterling common sense, large gatherings
of men, women, and children, seated on rough boards
in some unfinished building; again, holding public debates
in some town with half-fledged editors and
<SPAN name="Page_170"></SPAN>clergymen; next, sailing up the Columbia River
and,
in hot haste to meet some appointment, jolting over the
rough mountains of Oregon and Washington; and
then, before legislative assemblies, constitutional conventions,
and congressional committees, discussing
with senators and judges the letter and spirit of constitutional
law.</p>
<p>Miss Anthony's style of speaking is rapid and
vehement. In debate she is ready and keen, and she is
always equal to an emergency. Many times in traveling
with her through the West, especially on our first
trip to Kansas and California, we were suddenly called
upon to speak to the women assembled at the stations.
Filled with consternation, I usually appealed to her to
go first; and, without a moment's hesitation, she could
always fill five minutes with some appropriate words
and inspire me with thoughts and courage to follow.
The climax of these occasions was reached in an institution
for the deaf and dumb in Michigan. I had just
said to my friend, "There is one comfort in visiting
this place; we shall not be asked to speak," when the
superintendent, approaching us, said, "Ladies, the
pupils are assembled in the chapel, ready to hear you.
I promised to invite you to speak to them as soon as I
heard you were in town." The possibility of addressing
such an audience was as novel to Miss Anthony as
to me; yet she promptly walked down the aisle to the
platform, as if to perform an ordinary duty, while I,
half distracted with anxiety, wondering by what process
I was to be placed in communication with the deaf
and dumb, reluctantly followed. But the manner was
simple enough, when illustrated. The superintendent,
standing by our side, repeated, in the sign language,
<SPAN name="Page_171"></SPAN>what was said as fast as uttered; and by
laughter, tears,
and applause, the pupils showed that they fully appreciated
the pathos, humor, and argument.</p>
<p>One night, crossing the Mississippi at McGregor,
Iowa, we were icebound in the middle of the river. The
boat was crowded with people, hungry, tired, and cross
with the delay. Some gentlemen, with whom we had
been talking on the cars, started the cry, "Speech on
woman suffrage!" Accordingly, in the middle of the
Mississippi River, at midnight, we presented our claims
to political representation, and debated the question of
universal suffrage until we landed. Our voyagers were
quite thankful that we had shortened the many hours,
and we equally so at having made several converts and
held a convention on the very bosom of the great
"Mother of Waters." Only once in all these wanderings
was Miss Anthony taken by surprise, and that was
on being asked to speak to the inmates of an insane
asylum. "Bless me!" said she, "it is as much as I
can do to talk to the sane! What could I say to an
audience of lunatics?" Her companion, Virginia L.
Minor of St. Louis, replied: "This is a golden moment
for you, the first opportunity you have ever had,
according to the constitutions, to talk to your 'peers,'
for is not the right of suffrage denied to 'idiots, criminals,
lunatics, and women'?"</p>
<p>Much curiosity has been expressed as to the love-life
of Miss Anthony; but, if she has enjoyed or suffered
any of the usual triumphs or disappointments of her
sex, she has not yet vouchsafed this information to her
biographers. While few women have had more sincere
and lasting friendships, or a more extensive correspondence
with a large circle of noble men, yet I
<SPAN name="Page_172"></SPAN>doubt if one of them can boast of having
received from
her any exceptional attention. She has often playfully
said, when questioned on this point, that she could not
consent that the man she loved, described in the Constitution
as a white male, native born, American citizen,
possessed of the right of self-government, eligible
to the office of President of the great Republic, should
unite his destinies in marriage with a political slave
and pariah. "No, no; when I am crowned with all the
rights, privileges, and immunities of a citizen, I may
give some consideration to this social institution; but
until then I must concentrate all my energies on the enfranchisement
of my own sex." Miss Anthony's love-life,
like her religion, has manifested itself in steadfast,
earnest labors for men in general. She has been a
watchful and affectionate daughter, sister, friend, and
those who have felt the pulsations of her great heart
know how warmly it beats for all.</p>
<p>As the custom has long been observed, among married
women, of celebrating the anniversaries of their
wedding-day, quite properly the initiative has been
taken, in late years, of doing honor to the great events
in the lives of single women. Being united in closest
bonds to her profession, Dr. Harriet K. Hunt of Boston
celebrated her twenty-fifth year of faithful services
as a physician by giving to her friends and patrons a
large reception, which she called her silver wedding.
From a feeling of the sacredness of her life work, the
admirers of Susan B. Anthony have been moved to
mark, by reception and convention, her rapid-flowing
years and the passing decades of the suffrage movement.
To the most brilliant occasion of this kind, the
invitation cards were as follows:<SPAN name="Page_173"></SPAN></p>
<div class="blkquot">
<p>The ladies of the Woman's Bureau invite you to a reception on
Tuesday evening, February 15th, to celebrate the fiftieth birthday of
Susan B. Anthony, when her friends will have an opportunity to show
their appreciation of her long services in behalf of woman's
emancipation.</p>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">No. 49 East 23d St., New York,<br/>
<div style="margin-left: 40px;">February 10, 1870.</div>
</div>
<p style="margin-left: 160px; font-weight: bold;">Elizabeth B. Phelps,<br/>
Anna B. Darling,<br/>
Charlotte Beebe Wilbour.</p>
</div>
<p>In response to the invitation, the parlors of the bureau
were crowded with friends to congratulate Miss Anthony
on the happy event, many bringing valuable
gifts as an expression of their gratitude. Among
other presents were a handsome gold watch and
checks to the amount of a thousand dollars. The
guests were entertained with music, recitations,
the reading of many piquant letters of regret from
distinguished people, and witty rhymes written for
the occasion by the Cary sisters. Miss Anthony
received her guests with her usual straightforward
simplicity, and in a few earnest words expressed
her thanks for the presents and praises showered upon
her. The comments of the leading journals, next day,
were highly complimentary, and as genial as amusing.
All dwelt on the fact that, at last, a woman had arisen
brave enough to assert her right to grow old and openly
declare that half a century had rolled over her head.</p>
<p>Of carefully prepared written speeches Miss Anthony
has made few; but these, by the high praise they
called forth, prove that she can—in spite of her own
declaration to the contrary—put her sterling thoughts
on paper concisely and effectively. After her exhaustive
plea, in 1880, for a Sixteenth Amendment before
<SPAN name="Page_174"></SPAN>the Judiciary Committee of the Senate, Senator
Edmunds
accosted her, as she was leaving the Capitol, and
said he neglected to tell her, in the committee room,
that she had made an argument, no matter what his
personal feelings were as to the conclusions reached,
which was unanswerable—an argument, unlike the
usual platform oratory given at hearings, suited to a
committee of men trained to the law.</p>
<p>It was in 1876 that Miss Anthony gave her much
criticised lecture on "Social Purity" in Boston. As
to the result she felt very anxious; for the intelligence
of New England composed her audience, and it did not
still her heart-beats to see, sitting just in front of the
platform, her revered friend, William Lloyd Garrison.
But surely every fear vanished when she felt the grand
old abolitionist's hand warmly pressing hers, and heard
him say that to listen to no one else would he have had
courage to leave his sick room, and that he felt fully repaid
by her grand speech, which neither in matter nor
manner would he have changed in the smallest particular.
But into Miss Anthony's private correspondence
one must look for examples of her most effective writing.
Verb or substantive is often wanting, but you
can always catch the thought, and will ever find it clear
and suggestive. It is a strikingly strange dialect, but
one that touches, at times, the deepest chords of pathos
and humor, and, when stirred by some great event, is
highly eloquent.</p>
<p>From being the most ridiculed and mercilessly persecuted
woman, Miss Anthony has become the most
honored and respected in the nation. Witness the
praises of press and people, and the enthusiastic ovations
she received on her departure for Europe in
<SPAN name="Page_175"></SPAN>1883. Never were warmer expressions of regret
for
an absence, nor more sincere prayers for a speedy return,
accorded to any American on leaving his native
shores. This slow awaking to the character of her
services shows the abiding sense of justice in the human
soul. Having spent the winter of 1882-83 in Washington,
trying to press to a vote the bill for a Sixteenth
Amendment before Congress, and the autumn in a
vigorous campaign through Nebraska, where a constitutional
amendment to enfranchise women had been
submitted to the people, she felt the imperative need of
an entire change in the current of her thoughts. Accordingly,
after one of the most successful conventions
ever held at the national capital, and a most flattering
ovation in the spacious parlors of the Riggs House, and
a large reception in Philadelphia, she sailed for Europe.</p>
<p>Fortunate in being perfectly well during the entire
voyage, our traveler received perpetual enjoyment in
watching the ever varying sea and sky. To the captain's
merry challenge to find anything so grand as the
ocean, she replied, "Yes, these mighty forces in nature
do indeed fill me with awe; but this vessel, with deep-buried
fires, powerful machinery, spacious decks, and
tapering masts, walking the waves like a thing of life,
and all the work of man, impresses one still more deeply.
Lo! in man's divine creative power is fulfilled the
prophecy, 'Ye shall be as Gods!'"</p>
<p>In all her journeyings through Germany, Italy, and
France, Miss Anthony was never the mere sight-seer,
but always the humanitarian and reformer in traveler's
guise. Few of the great masterpieces of art gave
her real enjoyment. The keen appreciation of the
beauties of sculpture, painting, and architecture, which
<SPAN name="Page_176"></SPAN>one would have expected to find in so deep a
religious
nature, was wanting, warped, no doubt, by her early
Quaker training. That her travels gave her more pain
than pleasure was, perhaps, not so much that she had
no appreciation of aesthetic beauty, but that she quickly
grasped the infinitude of human misery; not because
her soul did not feel the heights to which art had
risen, but that it vibrated in every fiber to the depths
to which mankind had fallen. Wandering through
a gorgeous palace one day, she exclaimed, "What
do you find to admire here? If it were a school
of five hundred children being educated into the
right of self-government I could admire it, too;
but standing for one man's pleasure, I say no!" In the
quarters of one of the devotees, at the old monastery
of the Certosa, at Florence, there lies, on a small table,
an open book, in which visitors register. On the occasion
of Miss Anthony's visit the pen and ink proved
so unpromising that her entire party declined this opportunity
to make themselves famous, but she made the
rebellious pen inscribe, "Perfect equality for women,
civil, political, religious. Susan B. Anthony, U.S.A."
Friends, who visited the monastery next day, reported
that lines had been drawn through this heretical
sentiment.</p>
<p>During her visit at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Sargent,
in Berlin, Miss Anthony quite innocently posted
her letters in the official envelopes of our Suffrage
Association, which bore the usual mottoes, "No
just government can be formed without the consent
of the governed," etc. In a few days an official
brought back a large package, saying, "Such sentiments
are not allowed to pass through the post office."
<SPAN name="Page_177"></SPAN>Probably nothing saved her from arrest as a
socialist,
under the tyrannical police regulations, but the fact that
she was the guest of the Minister Plenipotentiary of the
United States.</p>
<p>My son Theodore wrote of Miss Anthony's visit in
Paris: "I had never before seen her in the role of tourist.
She seemed interested only in historical monuments,
and in the men and questions of the hour. The
galleries of the Louvre had little attraction for her, but
she gazed with deep pleasure at Napoleon's tomb,
Notre Dame, and the ruins of the Tuileries. She was
always ready to listen to discussions on the political
problems before the French people, the prospects of the
Republic, the divorce agitation, and the education of
women. 'I had rather see Jules Ferry than all the
pictures of the Louvre, Luxembourg, and Salon,' she
remarked at table. A day or two later she saw Ferry
at Laboulaye's funeral. The three things which made
the deepest impression on Miss Anthony, during her
stay at Paris, were probably the interment of Laboulaye
(the friend of the United States and of the woman
movement); the touching anniversary demonstration of
the Communists, at the Cemetery of Père La Chaise,
on the very spot where the last defenders of the Commune
of 1871 were ruthlessly shot and buried in a common
grave; and a woman's rights meeting, held in a
little hall in the Rue de Rivoli, at which the brave, far-seeing
Mlle. Hubertine Auchet was the leading spirit."</p>
<p>While on the Continent Miss Anthony experienced
the unfortunate sensation of being deaf and dumb; to
speak and not to be understood, to hear and not to comprehend,
were to her bitter realities. We can imagine
to what desperation she was brought when her Quaker
<SPAN name="Page_178"></SPAN>prudishness could hail an emphatic oath in
English
from a French official with the exclamation, "Well, it
sounds good to hear someone even swear in old Anglo-Saxon!"
After two months of enforced silence, she
was buoyant in reaching the British Islands once more,
where she could enjoy public speaking and general conversation.
Here she was the recipient of many generous
social attentions, and, on May 25, a large public
meeting of representative people, presided over by
Jacob Bright, was called, in our honor, by the National
Association of Great Britain. She spoke on the educational
and political status of women in America, I
of their religious and social position.</p>
<p>Before closing my friend's biography I shall trace two
golden threads in this closely woven life of incident.
One of the greatest services rendered by Miss Anthony
to the suffrage cause was in casting a vote in the Presidential
election of 1872, in order to test the rights of
women under the Fourteenth Amendment. For this
offense the brave woman was arrested, on Thanksgiving
Day, the national holiday handed down to us by Pilgrim
Fathers escaped from England's persecutions. She
asked for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ being flatly
refused, in January, 1873, her counsel gave bonds. The
daring defendant finding, when too late, that this not
only kept her out of jail, but her case out of the Supreme
Court of the United States, regretfully determined
to fight on, and gain the uttermost by a decision
in the United States Circuit Court. Her trial was set
down for the Rochester term in May. Quickly she canvassed
the whole county, laying before every probable
juror the strength of her case. When the time for the
trial arrived, the District Attorney, fearing the result,
<SPAN name="Page_179"></SPAN>if the decision were left to a jury drawn from
Miss Anthony's
enlightened county, transferred the trial to the
Ontario County term, in June, 1873.</p>
<p>It was now necessary to instruct the citizens of another
county. In this task Miss Anthony received valuable
assistance from Matilda Joslyn Gage; and, to meet
all this new expense, financial aid was generously
given, unsolicited, by Thomas Wentworth Higginson,
Gerrit Smith, and other sympathizers. But in
vain was every effort; in vain the appeal of Miss
Anthony to her jurors; in vain the moral influence
of the leading representatives of the bar of Central
New York filling the courtroom, for Judge
Hunt, without precedent to sustain him, declaring it a
case of law and not of fact, refused to give the case to
the jury, reserving to himself final decision. Was it
not an historic scene which was enacted there in that
little courthouse in Canandaigua? All the inconsistencies
were embodied in that Judge, punctilious in manner,
scrupulous in attire, conscientious in trivialities, and
obtuse on great principles, fitly described by Charles
O'Conor—"A very ladylike Judge." Behold him sitting
there, balancing all the niceties of law and equity in
his Old World scales, and at last saying, "The prisoner
will stand up." Whereupon the accused arose. "The
sentence of the court is that you pay a fine of one hundred
dollars and the costs of the prosecution." Then
the unruly defendant answers: "May it please your
Honor, I shall never pay a dollar of your unjust penalty,"
and more to the same effect, all of which she has lived
up to. The "ladylike" Judge had gained some insight
into the determination of the prisoner; so, not wishing
to incarcerate her to all eternity, he added gently:
"<SPAN name="Page_180"></SPAN>Madam, the court will not order you committed
until the fine is paid."</p>
<p>It was on the 17th of June that the verdict was given.
On that very day, a little less than a century before,
the brave militia was driven back at Bunker Hill—back,
back, almost wiped out; yet truth was in their ranks,
and justice, too. But how ended that rebellion of weak
colonists? The cause of American womanhood, embodied
for the moment in the liberty of a single individual,
received a rebuff on June 17, 1873; but, just as
surely as our Revolutionary heroes were in the end victorious,
so will the inalienable rights of our heroines of
the nineteenth century receive final vindication.</p>
<p>In his speech of 1880, before the Phi Beta Kappa
Society at Harvard, Wendell Phillips said—what as a
rule is true—that "a reformer, to be conscientious,
must be free from bread-winning." I will open Miss
Anthony's accounts and show that this reformer,
being, perhaps, the exception which proves the
rule, has been consistently and conscientiously in
debt. Turning over her year-books the pages give a
fair record up to 1863. Here began the first herculean
labor. The Woman's Loyal League, sadly in need of
funds, was not an incorporated association, so its secretary
assumed the debts. Accounts here became
quite lamentable, the deficit reaching five thousand
dollars. It must be paid, and, in fact, will be paid.
Anxious, weary hours were spent in crowding the
Cooper Institute, from week to week, with paying audiences,
to listen to such men as Phillips, Curtis, and
Douglass, who contributed their services, and lifted the
secretary out of debt. At last, after many difficulties,
her cash-book of 1863 was honorably pigeon-holed. In
<SPAN name="Page_181"></SPAN>1867 we can read account of herculean labor the
second. Twenty thousand tracts are needed to convert
the voters of Kansas to woman suffrage. Traveling
expenses to Kansas, and the tracts, make the debtor
column overreach the creditor some two thousand dollars.
There is recognition on these pages of more than
one thousand dollars obtained by soliciting advertisements,
but no note is made of the weary, burning July
days spent in the streets of New York to procure this
money, nor of the ready application of the savings made
by petty economies from her salary from the Hovey
Committee.</p>
<p>It would have been fortunate for my brave friend, if
cash-books 1868, 1869, and 1870 had never come down
from their shelves; for they sing and sing, in notes of
debts, till all unite in one vast chorus of far more than
ten thousand dollars. These were the days of the
<i>Revolution</i>, the newspaper, not the war, though it
was warfare for the debt-ridden manager. Several
thousand dollars she paid with money earned by lecturing,
and with money given her for personal use. One
Thanksgiving was, in truth, a time for returning
thanks; for she received, canceled, from her cousin,
Anson Lapham, her note for four thousand dollars.
After the funeral of Paulina Wright Davis, the bereaved
widower pressed into Miss Anthony's hand canceled
notes for five hundred dollars, bearing on the back the
words, "In memory of my beloved wife." One other
note was canceled in recognition of her perfect forgetfulness
of self-interest and ready sacrifice to the needs
of others. When laboring, in 1874, to fill every engagement,
in order to meet her debts, her mother's
sudden illness called her home. Without one selfish
<SPAN name="Page_182"></SPAN>regret, the anxious daughter hastened to
Rochester.
When recovery was certain, and Miss Anthony was
about to return to her fatiguing labors, her mother
gave her, at parting, her note for a thousand dollars,
on which was written, in trembling lines, "In just consideration
of the tender sacrifice made to nurse me in
severe illness." At last all the <i>Revolution</i> debt was
paid, except that due to her generous sister, Mary
Anthony, who used often humorously to assure her she
was a fit subject for the bankrupt act.</p>
<p>There is something humorously pathetic in the death
of the <i>Revolution</i>—that firstborn of Miss Anthony.
Mrs. Laura Curtis Bullard generously assumed the
care of the troublesome child, and, in order to make the
adoption legal, gave the usual consideration—one dollar.
The very night of the transfer Miss Anthony went
to Rochester with the dollar in her pocket, and the little
change left after purchasing her ticket. She arrived
safely with her debts, but nothing more—her pocket
had been picked! Oh, thief, could you but know what
value of faithful work you purloined!</p>
<p>From the close of the year 1876 Miss Anthony's accounts
showed favorable signs as to the credit column.
Indeed, at the end of five years there was a solid balance
of several thousand dollars earned on lecturing tours.
But alas! the accounts grow dim again—in fact the
credit column fades away. "The History of Woman
Suffrage" ruthlessly swallowed up every vestige of Miss
Anthony's bank account. But, in 1886, by the will of
Mrs. Eddy, daughter of Francis Jackson of Boston,
Miss Anthony received twenty-four thousand dollars
for the Woman's Suffrage Movement, which lifted her
out of debt once more.</p>
<p><SPAN name="Page_183"></SPAN>In vain will you search these telltale books
for evidence
of personal extravagance; for, although Miss
Anthony thinks it true economy to buy the best, her
tastes are simple. Is there not something very touching
in the fact that she never bought a book or picture
for her own enjoyment? The meager personal balance-sheets
show four lapses from discipline,—lapses that she
even now regards as ruthless extravagance,—viz.: the
purchase of two inexpensive brooches, a much needed
watch, and a pair of cuffs to match a point-lace collar
presented by a friend. Those interested in Miss Anthony's
personal appearance long ago ceased to trust
her with the purchase-money for any ornament; for,
however firm her resolution to comply with their wish,
the check invariably found its way to the credit column
of those little cash-books as "money received for the
cause." Now, reader, you have been admitted to a
private view of Miss Anthony's financial records, and
you can appreciate her devotion to an idea. Do you not
agree with me that a "bread-winner" can be a conscientious
reformer?</p>
<p>In finishing this sketch of the most intimate friend
I have had for the past forty-five years,—with whom I
have spent weeks and months under the same roof,—I
can truly say that she is the most upright, courageous,
self-sacrificing, magnanimous human being I have ever
known. I have seen her beset on every side with the
most petty annoyances, ridiculed and misrepresented,
slandered and persecuted; I have known women refuse
to take her extended hand; women to whom she
presented copies of "The History of Woman Suffrage,"
return it unnoticed; others to keep it without one word
of acknowledgment; others to write most insulting
<SPAN name="Page_184"></SPAN>letters in answer to hers of affectionate
conciliation.
And yet, under all the cross-fires incident to a reform,
never has her hope flagged, her self-respect wavered,
or a feeling of resentment shadowed her mind. Oftentimes,
when I have been sorely discouraged, thinking
that the prolonged struggle was a waste of force which
in other directions might be rich in achievement, with
her sublime faith in humanity, she would breathe into
my soul renewed inspiration, saying, "Pity rather than
blame those who persecute us." So closely interwoven
have been our lives, our purposes, and experiences that,
separated, we have a feeling of incompleteness—united,
such strength of self-assertion that no ordinary obstacles,
difficulties, or dangers ever appear to us insurmountable.
Reviewing the life of Susan B. Anthony,
I ever liken her to the Doric column in Grecian architecture,
so simply, so grandly she stands, free from
every extraneous ornament, supporting her one vast
idea—the enfranchisement of woman.</p>
<p>As our estimate of ourselves and our friendship may
differ somewhat from that taken from an objective
point of view, I will give an extract from what our common
friend Theodore Tilton wrote of us in 1868:</p>
<div class="blkquot">
<p>"Miss Susan B. Anthony, a well-known, indefatigable,
and lifelong advocate of temperance, anti-slavery,
and woman's rights, has been, since 1851, Mrs. Stanton's
intimate associate in reformatory labors. These celebrated
women are of about equal age, but of the most
opposite characteristics, and illustrate the theory of
counterparts in affection by entertaining for each other
a friendship of extraordinary strength.</p>
<p>"Mrs. Stanton is a fine writer, but a poor executant;
Miss Anthony is a thorough manager, but a poor
<SPAN name="Page_185"></SPAN>writer. Both have large brains and great hearts;
neither has any selfish ambition for celebrity; but
each vies with the other in a noble enthusiasm for the
cause to which they are devoting their lives.</p>
<p>"Nevertheless, to describe them critically, I ought
to say that, opposites though they be, each does not so
much supplement the other's deficiencies as augment
the other's eccentricities. Thus they often stimulate
each other's aggressiveness, and, at the same time, diminish
each other's discretion.</p>
<p>"But, whatever may be the imprudent utterances of
the one or the impolitic methods of the other, the animating
motives of both are evermore as white as the
light. The good that they do is by design; the harm
by accident. These two women, sitting together in
their parlors, have, for the last thirty years, been diligent
forgers of all manner of projectiles, from fireworks
to thunderbolts, and have hurled them with unexpected
explosion into the midst of all manner of educational,
reformatory, religious, and political assemblies; sometimes
to the pleasant surprise and half welcome of the
members, more often to the bewilderment and prostration
of numerous victims; and, in a few signal instances,
to the gnashing of angry men's teeth. I know of no
two more pertinacious incendiaries in the whole country.
Nor will they, themselves deny the charge. In
fact this noise-making twain are the two sticks of a
drum, keeping up what Daniel Webster called 'The
rub-a-dub of agitation.'"</p>
</div>
<hr style="width: 65%;">
<SPAN name="CHAPTER_XII"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />