<h2>CHAPTER XXVI—ENGLAND UNDER HENRY THE SEVENTH</h2>
<p>King Henry the Seventh did not turn out to be as fine a fellow
as the nobility and people hoped, in the first joy of their
deliverance from Richard the Third. He was very cold,
crafty, and calculating, and would do almost anything for
money. He possessed considerable ability, but his chief
merit appears to have been that he was not cruel when there was
nothing to be got by it.</p>
<p>The new King had promised the nobles who had espoused his
cause that he would marry the Princess Elizabeth. The first
thing he did, was, to direct her to be removed from the castle of
Sheriff Hutton in Yorkshire, where Richard had placed her, and
restored to the care of her mother in London. The young
Earl of Warwick, Edward Plantagenet, son and heir of the late
Duke of Clarence, had been kept a prisoner in the same old
Yorkshire Castle with her. This boy, who was now fifteen,
the new King placed in the Tower for safety. Then he came
to London in great state, and gratified the people with a fine
procession; on which kind of show he often very much relied for
keeping them in good humour. The sports and feasts which
took place were followed by a terrible fever, called the Sweating
Sickness; of which great numbers of people died. Lord
Mayors and Aldermen are thought to have suffered most from it;
whether, because they were in the habit of over-eating
themselves, or because they were very jealous of preserving filth
and nuisances in the City (as they have been since), I
don’t know.</p>
<p>The King’s coronation was postponed on account of the
general ill-health, and he afterwards deferred his marriage, as
if he were not very anxious that it should take place: and, even
after that, deferred the Queen’s coronation so long that he
gave offence to the York party. However, he set these
things right in the end, by hanging some men and seizing on the
rich possessions of others; by granting more popular pardons to
the followers of the late King than could, at first, be got from
him; and, by employing about his Court, some very scrupulous
persons who had been employed in the previous reign.</p>
<p>As this reign was principally remarkable for two very curious
impostures which have become famous in history, we will make
those two stories its principal feature.</p>
<p>There was a priest at Oxford of the name of Simons, who had
for a pupil a handsome boy named Lambert Simnel, the son of a
baker. Partly to gratify his own ambitious ends, and partly
to carry out the designs of a secret party formed against the
King, this priest declared that his pupil, the boy, was no other
than the young Earl of Warwick; who (as everybody might have
known) was safely locked up in the Tower of London. The
priest and the boy went over to Ireland; and, at Dublin, enlisted
in their cause all ranks of the people: who seem to have been
generous enough, but exceedingly irrational. The Earl of
Kildare, the governor of Ireland, declared that he believed the
boy to be what the priest represented; and the boy, who had been
well tutored by the priest, told them such things of his
childhood, and gave them so many descriptions of the Royal
Family, that they were perpetually shouting and hurrahing, and
drinking his health, and making all kinds of noisy and thirsty
demonstrations, to express their belief in him. Nor was
this feeling confined to Ireland alone, for the Earl of
Lincoln—whom the late usurper had named as his
successor—went over to the young Pretender; and, after
holding a secret correspondence with the Dowager Duchess of
Burgundy—the sister of Edward the Fourth, who detested the
present King and all his race—sailed to Dublin with two
thousand German soldiers of her providing. In this
promising state of the boy’s fortunes, he was crowned
there, with a crown taken off the head of a statue of the Virgin
Mary; and was then, according to the Irish custom of those days,
carried home on the shoulders of a big chieftain possessing a
great deal more strength than sense. Father Simons, you may
be sure, was mighty busy at the coronation.</p>
<p>Ten days afterwards, the Germans, and the Irish, and the
priest, and the boy, and the Earl of Lincoln, all landed in
Lancashire to invade England. The King, who had good
intelligence of their movements, set up his standard at
Nottingham, where vast numbers resorted to him every day; while
the Earl of Lincoln could gain but very few. With his small
force he tried to make for the town of Newark; but the
King’s army getting between him and that place, he had no
choice but to risk a battle at Stoke. It soon ended in the
complete destruction of the Pretender’s forces, one half of
whom were killed; among them, the Earl himself. The priest
and the baker’s boy were taken prisoners. The priest,
after confessing the trick, was shut up in prison, where he
afterwards died—suddenly perhaps. The boy was taken
into the King’s kitchen and made a turnspit. He was
afterwards raised to the station of one of the King’s
falconers; and so ended this strange imposition.</p>
<p>There seems reason to suspect that the Dowager
Queen—always a restless and busy woman—had had some
share in tutoring the baker’s son. The King was very
angry with her, whether or no. He seized upon her property,
and shut her up in a convent at Bermondsey.</p>
<p>One might suppose that the end of this story would have put
the Irish people on their guard; but they were quite ready to
receive a second impostor, as they had received the first, and
that same troublesome Duchess of Burgundy soon gave them the
opportunity. All of a sudden there appeared at Cork, in a
vessel arriving from Portugal, a young man of excellent
abilities, of very handsome appearance and most winning manners,
who declared himself to be Richard, Duke of York, the second son
of King Edward the Fourth. ‘O,’ said some, even
of those ready Irish believers, ‘but surely that young
Prince was murdered by his uncle in the
Tower!’—‘It <i>is</i> supposed so,’ said
the engaging young man; ‘and my brother <i>was</i> killed
in that gloomy prison; but I escaped—it don’t matter
how, at present—and have been wandering about the world for
seven long years.’ This explanation being quite
satisfactory to numbers of the Irish people, they began again to
shout and to hurrah, and to drink his health, and to make the
noisy and thirsty demonstrations all over again. And the
big chieftain in Dublin began to look out for another coronation,
and another young King to be carried home on his back.</p>
<p>Now, King Henry being then on bad terms with France, the
French King, Charles the Eighth, saw that, by pretending to
believe in the handsome young man, he could trouble his enemy
sorely. So, he invited him over to the French Court, and
appointed him a body-guard, and treated him in all respects as if
he really were the Duke of York. Peace, however, being soon
concluded between the two Kings, the pretended Duke was turned
adrift, and wandered for protection to the Duchess of
Burgundy. She, after feigning to inquire into the reality
of his claims, declared him to be the very picture of her dear
departed brother; gave him a body-guard at her Court, of thirty
halberdiers; and called him by the sounding name of the White
Rose of England.</p>
<p>The leading members of the White Rose party in England sent
over an agent, named Sir Robert Clifford, to ascertain whether
the White Rose’s claims were good: the King also sent over
his agents to inquire into the Rose’s history. The
White Roses declared the young man to be really the Duke of York;
the King declared him to be <span class="smcap">Perkin
Warbeck</span>, the son of a merchant of the city of Tournay, who
had acquired his knowledge of England, its language and manners,
from the English merchants who traded in Flanders; it was also
stated by the Royal agents that he had been in the service of
Lady Brompton, the wife of an exiled English nobleman, and that
the Duchess of Burgundy had caused him to be trained and taught,
expressly for this deception. The King then required the
Archduke Philip—who was the sovereign of Burgundy—to
banish this new Pretender, or to deliver him up; but, as the
Archduke replied that he could not control the Duchess in her own
land, the King, in revenge, took the market of English cloth away
from Antwerp, and prevented all commercial intercourse between
the two countries.</p>
<p>He also, by arts and bribes, prevailed on Sir Robert Clifford
to betray his employers; and he denouncing several famous English
noblemen as being secretly the friends of Perkin Warbeck, the
King had three of the foremost executed at once. Whether he
pardoned the remainder because they were poor, I do not know; but
it is only too probable that he refused to pardon one famous
nobleman against whom the same Clifford soon afterwards informed
separately, because he was rich. This was no other than Sir
William Stanley, who had saved the King’s life at the
battle of Bosworth Field. It is very doubtful whether his
treason amounted to much more than his having said, that if he
were sure the young man was the Duke of York, he would not take
arms against him. Whatever he had done he admitted, like an
honourable spirit; and he lost his head for it, and the covetous
King gained all his wealth.</p>
<p>Perkin Warbeck kept quiet for three years; but, as the
Flemings began to complain heavily of the loss of their trade by
the stoppage of the Antwerp market on his account, and as it was
not unlikely that they might even go so far as to take his life,
or give him up, he found it necessary to do something.
Accordingly he made a desperate sally, and landed, with only a
few hundred men, on the coast of Deal. But he was soon glad
to get back to the place from whence he came; for the country
people rose against his followers, killed a great many, and took
a hundred and fifty prisoners: who were all driven to London,
tied together with ropes, like a team of cattle. Every one
of them was hanged on some part or other of the sea-shore; in
order, that if any more men should come over with Perkin Warbeck,
they might see the bodies as a warning before they landed.</p>
<p>Then the wary King, by making a treaty of commerce with the
Flemings, drove Perkin Warbeck out of that country; and, by
completely gaining over the Irish to his side, deprived him of
that asylum too. He wandered away to Scotland, and told his
story at that Court. King James the Fourth of Scotland, who
was no friend to King Henry, and had no reason to be (for King
Henry had bribed his Scotch lords to betray him more than once;
but had never succeeded in his plots), gave him a great
reception, called him his cousin, and gave him in marriage the
Lady Catherine Gordon, a beautiful and charming creature related
to the royal house of Stuart.</p>
<p>Alarmed by this successful reappearance of the Pretender, the
King still undermined, and bought, and bribed, and kept his
doings and Perkin Warbeck’s story in the dark, when he
might, one would imagine, have rendered the matter clear to all
England. But, for all this bribing of the Scotch lords at
the Scotch King’s Court, he could not procure the Pretender
to be delivered up to him. James, though not very
particular in many respects, would not betray him; and the
ever-busy Duchess of Burgundy so provided him with arms, and good
soldiers, and with money besides, that he had soon a little army
of fifteen hundred men of various nations. With these, and
aided by the Scottish King in person, he crossed the border into
England, and made a proclamation to the people, in which he
called the King ‘Henry Tudor;’ offered large rewards
to any who should take or distress him; and announced himself as
King Richard the Fourth come to receive the homage of his
faithful subjects. His faithful subjects, however, cared
nothing for him, and hated his faithful troops: who, being of
different nations, quarrelled also among themselves. Worse
than this, if worse were possible, they began to plunder the
country; upon which the White Rose said, that he would rather
lose his rights, than gain them through the miseries of the
English people. The Scottish King made a jest of his
scruples; but they and their whole force went back again without
fighting a battle.</p>
<p>The worst consequence of this attempt was, that a rising took
place among the people of Cornwall, who considered themselves too
heavily taxed to meet the charges of the expected war.
Stimulated by Flammock, a lawyer, and Joseph, a blacksmith, and
joined by Lord Audley and some other country gentlemen, they
marched on all the way to Deptford Bridge, where they fought a
battle with the King’s army. They were
defeated—though the Cornish men fought with great
bravery—and the lord was beheaded, and the lawyer and the
blacksmith were hanged, drawn, and quartered. The rest were
pardoned. The King, who believed every man to be as
avaricious as himself, and thought that money could settle
anything, allowed them to make bargains for their liberty with
the soldiers who had taken them.</p>
<p>Perkin Warbeck, doomed to wander up and down, and never to
find rest anywhere—a sad fate: almost a sufficient
punishment for an imposture, which he seems in time to have half
believed himself—lost his Scottish refuge through a truce
being made between the two Kings; and found himself, once more,
without a country before him in which he could lay his
head. But James (always honourable and true to him, alike
when he melted down his plate, and even the great gold chain he
had been used to wear, to pay soldiers in his cause; and now,
when that cause was lost and hopeless) did not conclude the
treaty, until he had safely departed out of the Scottish
dominions. He, and his beautiful wife, who was faithful to
him under all reverses, and left her state and home to follow his
poor fortunes, were put aboard ship with everything necessary for
their comfort and protection, and sailed for Ireland.</p>
<p>But, the Irish people had had enough of counterfeit Earls of
Warwick and Dukes of York, for one while; and would give the
White Rose no aid. So, the White Rose—encircled by
thorns indeed—resolved to go with his beautiful wife to
Cornwall as a forlorn resource, and see what might be made of the
Cornish men, who had risen so valiantly a little while before,
and who had fought so bravely at Deptford Bridge.</p>
<p>To Whitsand Bay, in Cornwall, accordingly, came Perkin Warbeck
and his wife; and the lovely lady he shut up for safety in the
Castle of St. Michael’s Mount, and then marched into
Devonshire at the head of three thousand Cornishmen. These
were increased to six thousand by the time of his arrival in
Exeter; but, there the people made a stout resistance, and he
went on to Taunton, where he came in sight of the King’s
army. The stout Cornish men, although they were few in
number, and badly armed, were so bold, that they never thought of
retreating; but bravely looked forward to a battle on the
morrow. Unhappily for them, the man who was possessed of so
many engaging qualities, and who attracted so many people to his
side when he had nothing else with which to tempt them, was not
as brave as they. In the night, when the two armies lay
opposite to each other, he mounted a swift horse and fled.
When morning dawned, the poor confiding Cornish men, discovering
that they had no leader, surrendered to the King’s
power. Some of them were hanged, and the rest were pardoned
and went miserably home.</p>
<p>Before the King pursued Perkin Warbeck to the sanctuary of
Beaulieu in the New Forest, where it was soon known that he had
taken refuge, he sent a body of horsemen to St. Michael’s
Mount, to seize his wife. She was soon taken and brought as
a captive before the King. But she was so beautiful, and so
good, and so devoted to the man in whom she believed, that the
King regarded her with compassion, treated her with great
respect, and placed her at Court, near the Queen’s
person. And many years after Perkin Warbeck was no more,
and when his strange story had become like a nursery tale,
<i>she</i> was called the White Rose, by the people, in
remembrance of her beauty.</p>
<p>The sanctuary at Beaulieu was soon surrounded by the
King’s men; and the King, pursuing his usual dark, artful
ways, sent pretended friends to Perkin Warbeck to persuade him to
come out and surrender himself. This he soon did; the King
having taken a good look at the man of whom he had heard so
much—from behind a screen—directed him to be well
mounted, and to ride behind him at a little distance, guarded,
but not bound in any way. So they entered London with the
King’s favourite show—a procession; and some of the
people hooted as the Pretender rode slowly through the streets to
the Tower; but the greater part were quiet, and very curious to
see him. From the Tower, he was taken to the Palace at
Westminster, and there lodged like a gentleman, though closely
watched. He was examined every now and then as to his
imposture; but the King was so secret in all he did, that even
then he gave it a consequence, which it cannot be supposed to
have in itself deserved.</p>
<p>At last Perkin Warbeck ran away, and took refuge in another
sanctuary near Richmond in Surrey. From this he was again
persuaded to deliver himself up; and, being conveyed to London,
he stood in the stocks for a whole day, outside Westminster Hall,
and there read a paper purporting to be his full confession, and
relating his history as the King’s agents had originally
described it. He was then shut up in the Tower again, in
the company of the Earl of Warwick, who had now been there for
fourteen years: ever since his removal out of Yorkshire, except
when the King had had him at Court, and had shown him to the
people, to prove the imposture of the Baker’s boy. It
is but too probable, when we consider the crafty character of
Henry the Seventh, that these two were brought together for a
cruel purpose. A plot was soon discovered between them and
the keepers, to murder the Governor, get possession of the keys,
and proclaim Perkin Warbeck as King Richard the Fourth.
That there was some such plot, is likely; that they were tempted
into it, is at least as likely; that the unfortunate Earl of
Warwick—last male of the Plantagenet line—was too
unused to the world, and too ignorant and simple to know much
about it, whatever it was, is perfectly certain; and that it was
the King’s interest to get rid of him, is no less so.
He was beheaded on Tower Hill, and Perkin Warbeck was hanged at
Tyburn.</p>
<p>Such was the end of the pretended Duke of York, whose shadowy
history was made more shadowy—and ever will be—by the
mystery and craft of the King. If he had turned his great
natural advantages to a more honest account, he might have lived
a happy and respected life, even in those days. But he died
upon a gallows at Tyburn, leaving the Scottish lady, who had
loved him so well, kindly protected at the Queen’s
Court. After some time she forgot her old loves and
troubles, as many people do with Time’s merciful
assistance, and married a Welsh gentleman. Her second
husband, <span class="smcap">Sir Matthew Cradoc</span>, more
honest and more happy than her first, lies beside her in a tomb
in the old church of Swansea.</p>
<p>The ill-blood between France and England in this reign, arose
out of the continued plotting of the Duchess of Burgundy, and
disputes respecting the affairs of Brittany. The King
feigned to be very patriotic, indignant, and warlike; but he
always contrived so as never to make war in reality, and always
to make money. His taxation of the people, on pretence of
war with France, involved, at one time, a very dangerous
insurrection, headed by Sir John Egremont, and a common man
called John à Chambre. But it was subdued by the
royal forces, under the command of the Earl of Surrey. The
knighted John escaped to the Duchess of Burgundy, who was ever
ready to receive any one who gave the King trouble; and the plain
John was hanged at York, in the midst of a number of his men, but
on a much higher gibbet, as being a greater traitor. Hung
high or hung low, however, hanging is much the same to the person
hung.</p>
<p>Within a year after her marriage, the Queen had given birth to
a son, who was called Prince Arthur, in remembrance of the old
British prince of romance and story; and who, when all these
events had happened, being then in his fifteenth year, was
married to <span class="smcap">Catherine</span>, the daughter of
the Spanish monarch, with great rejoicings and bright prospects;
but in a very few months he sickened and died. As soon as
the King had recovered from his grief, he thought it a pity that
the fortune of the Spanish Princess, amounting to two hundred
thousand crowns, should go out of the family; and therefore
arranged that the young widow should marry his second son <span class="smcap">Henry</span>, then twelve years of age, when he too
should be fifteen. There were objections to this marriage
on the part of the clergy; but, as the infallible Pope was gained
over, and, as he <i>must</i> be right, that settled the business
for the time. The King’s eldest daughter was provided
for, and a long course of disturbance was considered to be set at
rest, by her being married to the Scottish King.</p>
<p>And now the Queen died. When the King had got over that
grief too, his mind once more reverted to his darling money for
consolation, and he thought of marrying the Dowager Queen of
Naples, who was immensely rich: but, as it turned out not to be
practicable to gain the money however practicable it might have
been to gain the lady, he gave up the idea. He was not so
fond of her but that he soon proposed to marry the Dowager
Duchess of Savoy; and, soon afterwards, the widow of the King of
Castile, who was raving mad. But he made a money-bargain
instead, and married neither.</p>
<p>The Duchess of Burgundy, among the other discontented people
to whom she had given refuge, had sheltered <span class="smcap">Edmund de la Pole</span> (younger brother of that
Earl of Lincoln who was killed at Stoke), now Earl of
Suffolk. The King had prevailed upon him to return to the
marriage of Prince Arthur; but, he soon afterwards went away
again; and then the King, suspecting a conspiracy, resorted to
his favourite plan of sending him some treacherous friends, and
buying of those scoundrels the secrets they disclosed or
invented. Some arrests and executions took place in
consequence. In the end, the King, on a promise of not
taking his life, obtained possession of the person of Edmund de
la Pole, and shut him up in the Tower.</p>
<p>This was his last enemy. If he had lived much longer he
would have made many more among the people, by the grinding
exaction to which he constantly exposed them, and by the
tyrannical acts of his two prime favourites in all money-raising
matters, <span class="smcap">Edmund Dudley</span> and <span class="smcap">Richard Empson</span>. But Death—the
enemy who is not to be bought off or deceived, and on whom no
money, and no treachery has any effect—presented himself at
this juncture, and ended the King’s reign. He died of
the gout, on the twenty-second of April, one thousand five
hundred and nine, and in the fifty-third year of his age, after
reigning twenty-four years; he was buried in the beautiful Chapel
of Westminster Abbey, which he had himself founded, and which
still bears his name.</p>
<p>It was in this reign that the great <span class="smcap">Christopher Columbus</span>, on behalf of Spain,
discovered what was then called The New World. Great
wonder, interest, and hope of wealth being awakened in England
thereby, the King and the merchants of London and Bristol fitted
out an English expedition for further discoveries in the New
World, and entrusted it to <span class="smcap">Sebastian
Cabot</span>, of Bristol, the son of a Venetian pilot
there. He was very successful in his voyage, and gained
high reputation, both for himself and England.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />