<h2>CHAPTER XXXII—ENGLAND UNDER JAMES THE FIRST</h2>
<p>‘Our cousin of Scotland’ was ugly, awkward, and
shuffling both in mind and person. His tongue was much too
large for his mouth, his legs were much too weak for his body,
and his dull goggle-eyes stared and rolled like an
idiot’s. He was cunning, covetous, wasteful, idle,
drunken, greedy, dirty, cowardly, a great swearer, and the most
conceited man on earth. His figure—what is commonly
called rickety from his birth—presented a most ridiculous
appearance, dressed in thick padded clothes, as a safeguard
against being stabbed (of which he lived in continual fear), of a
grass-green colour from head to foot, with a hunting-horn
dangling at his side instead of a sword, and his hat and feather
sticking over one eye, or hanging on the back of his head, as he
happened to toss it on. He used to loll on the necks of his
favourite courtiers, and slobber their faces, and kiss and pinch
their cheeks; and the greatest favourite he ever had, used to
sign himself in his letters to his royal master, His
Majesty’s ‘dog and slave,’ and used to address
his majesty as ‘his Sowship.’ His majesty was
the worst rider ever seen, and thought himself the best. He
was one of the most impertinent talkers (in the broadest Scotch)
ever heard, and boasted of being unanswerable in all manner of
argument. He wrote some of the most wearisome treatises
ever read—among others, a book upon witchcraft, in which he
was a devout believer—and thought himself a prodigy of
authorship. He thought, and wrote, and said, that a king
had a right to make and unmake what laws he pleased, and ought to
be accountable to nobody on earth. This is the plain, true
character of the personage whom the greatest men about the court
praised and flattered to that degree, that I doubt if there be
anything much more shameful in the annals of human nature.</p>
<p>He came to the English throne with great ease. The
miseries of a disputed succession had been felt so long, and so
dreadfully, that he was proclaimed within a few hours of
Elizabeth’s death, and was accepted by the nation, even
without being asked to give any pledge that he would govern well,
or that he would redress crying grievances. He took a month
to come from Edinburgh to London; and, by way of exercising his
new power, hanged a pickpocket on the journey without any trial,
and knighted everybody he could lay hold of. He made two
hundred knights before he got to his palace in London, and seven
hundred before he had been in it three months. He also
shovelled sixty-two new peers into the House of Lords—and
there was a pretty large sprinkling of Scotchmen among them, you
may believe.</p>
<p>His Sowship’s prime Minister, <span class="smcap">Cecil</span> (for I cannot do better than call his
majesty what his favourite called him), was the enemy of Sir
Walter Raleigh, and also of Sir Walter’s political friend,
<span class="smcap">Lord Cobham</span>; and his Sowship’s
first trouble was a plot originated by these two, and entered
into by some others, with the old object of seizing the King and
keeping him in imprisonment until he should change his
ministers. There were Catholic priests in the plot, and
there were Puritan noblemen too; for, although the Catholics and
Puritans were strongly opposed to each other, they united at this
time against his Sowship, because they knew that he had a design
against both, after pretending to be friendly to each; this
design being to have only one high and convenient form of the
Protestant religion, which everybody should be bound to belong
to, whether they liked it or not. This plot was mixed up
with another, which may or may not have had some reference to
placing on the throne, at some time, the <span class="smcap">Lady
Arabella Stuart</span>; whose misfortune it was, to be the
daughter of the younger brother of his Sowship’s father,
but who was quite innocent of any part in the scheme. Sir
Walter Raleigh was accused on the confession of Lord
Cobham—a miserable creature, who said one thing at one
time, and another thing at another time, and could be relied upon
in nothing. The trial of Sir Walter Raleigh lasted from
eight in the morning until nearly midnight; he defended himself
with such eloquence, genius, and spirit against all accusations,
and against the insults of <span class="smcap">Coke</span>, the
Attorney-General—who, according to the custom of the time,
foully abused him—that those who went there detesting the
prisoner, came away admiring him, and declaring that anything so
wonderful and so captivating was never heard. He was found
guilty, nevertheless, and sentenced to death. Execution was
deferred, and he was taken to the Tower. The two Catholic
priests, less fortunate, were executed with the usual atrocity;
and Lord Cobham and two others were pardoned on the
scaffold. His Sowship thought it wonderfully knowing in him
to surprise the people by pardoning these three at the very
block; but, blundering, and bungling, as usual, he had very
nearly overreached himself. For, the messenger on horseback
who brought the pardon, came so late, that he was pushed to the
outside of the crowd, and was obliged to shout and roar out what
he came for. The miserable Cobham did not gain much by
being spared that day. He lived, both as a prisoner and a
beggar, utterly despised, and miserably poor, for thirteen years,
and then died in an old outhouse belonging to one of his former
servants.</p>
<p>This plot got rid of, and Sir Walter Raleigh safely shut up in
the Tower, his Sowship held a great dispute with the Puritans on
their presenting a petition to him, and had it all his own
way—not so very wonderful, as he would talk continually,
and would not hear anybody else—and filled the Bishops with
admiration. It was comfortably settled that there was to be
only one form of religion, and that all men were to think exactly
alike. But, although this was arranged two centuries and a
half ago, and although the arrangement was supported by much
fining and imprisonment, I do not find that it is quite
successful, even yet.</p>
<p>His Sowship, having that uncommonly high opinion of himself as
a king, had a very low opinion of Parliament as a power that
audaciously wanted to control him. When he called his first
Parliament after he had been king a year, he accordingly thought
he would take pretty high ground with them, and told them that he
commanded them ‘as an absolute king.’ The
Parliament thought those strong words, and saw the necessity of
upholding their authority. His Sowship had three children:
Prince Henry, Prince Charles, and the Princess Elizabeth.
It would have been well for one of these, and we shall too soon
see which, if he had learnt a little wisdom concerning
Parliaments from his father’s obstinacy.</p>
<p>Now, the people still labouring under their old dread of the
Catholic religion, this Parliament revived and strengthened the
severe laws against it. And this so angered <span class="smcap">Robert Catesby</span>, a restless Catholic
gentleman of an old family, that he formed one of the most
desperate and terrible designs ever conceived in the mind of man;
no less a scheme than the Gunpowder Plot.</p>
<p>His object was, when the King, lords, and commons, should be
assembled at the next opening of Parliament, to blow them up, one
and all, with a great mine of gunpowder. The first person
to whom he confided this horrible idea was <span class="smcap">Thomas Winter</span>, a Worcestershire gentleman
who had served in the army abroad, and had been secretly employed
in Catholic projects. While Winter was yet undecided, and
when he had gone over to the Netherlands, to learn from the
Spanish Ambassador there whether there was any hope of Catholics
being relieved through the intercession of the King of Spain with
his Sowship, he found at Ostend a tall, dark, daring man, whom he
had known when they were both soldiers abroad, and whose name was
<span class="smcap">Guido</span>—or <span class="smcap">Guy</span>—<span class="smcap">Fawkes</span>. Resolved to join the plot, he
proposed it to this man, knowing him to be the man for any
desperate deed, and they two came back to England together.
Here, they admitted two other conspirators; <span class="smcap">Thomas Percy</span>, related to the Earl of
Northumberland, and <span class="smcap">John Wright</span>, his
brother-in-law. All these met together in a solitary house
in the open fields which were then near Clement’s Inn, now
a closely blocked-up part of London; and when they had all taken
a great oath of secrecy, Catesby told the rest what his plan
was. They then went up-stairs into a garret, and received
the Sacrament from <span class="smcap">Father Gerard</span>, a
Jesuit, who is said not to have known actually of the Gunpowder
Plot, but who, I think, must have had his suspicions that there
was something desperate afoot.</p>
<p>Percy was a Gentleman Pensioner, and as he had occasional
duties to perform about the Court, then kept at Whitehall, there
would be nothing suspicious in his living at Westminster.
So, having looked well about him, and having found a house to
let, the back of which joined the Parliament House, he hired it
of a person named <span class="smcap">Ferris</span>, for the
purpose of undermining the wall. Having got possession of
this house, the conspirators hired another on the Lambeth side of
the Thames, which they used as a storehouse for wood, gunpowder,
and other combustible matters. These were to be removed at
night (and afterwards were removed), bit by bit, to the house at
Westminster; and, that there might be some trusty person to keep
watch over the Lambeth stores, they admitted another conspirator,
by name <span class="smcap">Robert Kay</span>, a very poor
Catholic gentleman.</p>
<p>All these arrangements had been made some months, and it was a
dark, wintry, December night, when the conspirators, who had been
in the meantime dispersed to avoid observation, met in the house
at Westminster, and began to dig. They had laid in a good
stock of eatables, to avoid going in and out, and they dug and
dug with great ardour. But, the wall being tremendously
thick, and the work very severe, they took into their plot <span class="smcap">Christopher Wright</span>, a younger brother of
John Wright, that they might have a new pair of hands to
help. And Christopher Wright fell to like a fresh man, and
they dug and dug by night and by day, and Fawkes stood sentinel
all the time. And if any man’s heart seemed to fail
him at all, Fawkes said, ‘Gentlemen, we have abundance of
powder and shot here, and there is no fear of our being taken
alive, even if discovered.’ The same Fawkes, who, in
the capacity of sentinel, was always prowling about, soon picked
up the intelligence that the King had prorogued the Parliament
again, from the seventh of February, the day first fixed upon,
until the third of October. When the conspirators knew
this, they agreed to separate until after the Christmas holidays,
and to take no notice of each other in the meanwhile, and never
to write letters to one another on any account. So, the
house in Westminster was shut up again, and I suppose the
neighbours thought that those strange-looking men who lived there
so gloomily, and went out so seldom, were gone away to have a
merry Christmas somewhere.</p>
<p>It was the beginning of February, sixteen hundred and five,
when Catesby met his fellow-conspirators again at this
Westminster house. He had now admitted three more; <span class="smcap">John Grant</span>, a Warwickshire gentleman of a
melancholy temper, who lived in a doleful house near
Stratford-upon-Avon, with a frowning wall all round it, and a
deep moat; <span class="smcap">Robert Winter</span>, eldest
brother of Thomas; and Catesby’s own servant, <span class="smcap">Thomas Bates</span>, who, Catesby thought, had had
some suspicion of what his master was about. These three
had all suffered more or less for their religion in
Elizabeth’s time. And now, they all began to dig
again, and they dug and dug by night and by day.</p>
<p>They found it dismal work alone there, underground, with such
a fearful secret on their minds, and so many murders before
them. They were filled with wild fancies. Sometimes,
they thought they heard a great bell tolling, deep down in the
earth under the Parliament House; sometimes, they thought they
heard low voices muttering about the Gunpowder Plot; once in the
morning, they really did hear a great rumbling noise over their
heads, as they dug and sweated in their mine. Every man
stopped and looked aghast at his neighbour, wondering what had
happened, when that bold prowler, Fawkes, who had been out to
look, came in and told them that it was only a dealer in coals
who had occupied a cellar under the Parliament House, removing
his stock in trade to some other place. Upon this, the
conspirators, who with all their digging and digging had not yet
dug through the tremendously thick wall, changed their plan;
hired that cellar, which was directly under the House of Lords;
put six-and-thirty barrels of gunpowder in it, and covered them
over with fagots and coals. Then they all dispersed again
till September, when the following new conspirators were
admitted; <span class="smcap">Sir Edward Baynham</span>, of
Gloucestershire; <span class="smcap">Sir Everard Digby</span>, of
Rutlandshire; <span class="smcap">Ambrose Rookwood</span>, of
Suffolk; <span class="smcap">Francis Tresham</span>, of
Northamptonshire. Most of these were rich, and were to
assist the plot, some with money and some with horses on which
the conspirators were to ride through the country and rouse the
Catholics after the Parliament should be blown into air.</p>
<p>Parliament being again prorogued from the third of October to
the fifth of November, and the conspirators being uneasy lest
their design should have been found out, Thomas Winter said he
would go up into the House of Lords on the day of the
prorogation, and see how matters looked. Nothing could be
better. The unconscious Commissioners were walking about
and talking to one another, just over the six-and-thirty barrels
of gunpowder. He came back and told the rest so, and they
went on with their preparations. They hired a ship, and
kept it ready in the Thames, in which Fawkes was to sail for
Flanders after firing with a slow match the train that was to
explode the powder. A number of Catholic gentlemen not in
the secret, were invited, on pretence of a hunting party, to meet
Sir Everard Digby at Dunchurch on the fatal day, that they might
be ready to act together. And now all was ready.</p>
<p>But, now, the great wickedness and danger which had been all
along at the bottom of this wicked plot, began to show
itself. As the fifth of November drew near, most of the
conspirators, remembering that they had friends and relations who
would be in the House of Lords that day, felt some natural
relenting, and a wish to warn them to keep away. They were
not much comforted by Catesby’s declaring that in such a
cause he would blow up his own son. <span class="smcap">Lord Mounteagle</span>, Tresham’s
brother-in-law, was certain to be in the house; and when Tresham
found that he could not prevail upon the rest to devise any means
of sparing their friends, he wrote a mysterious letter to this
lord and left it at his lodging in the dusk, urging him to keep
away from the opening of Parliament, ‘since God and man had
concurred to punish the wickedness of the times.’ It
contained the words ‘that the Parliament should receive a
terrible blow, and yet should not see who hurt them.’
And it added, ‘the danger is past, as soon as you have
burnt the letter.’</p>
<p>The ministers and courtiers made out that his Sowship, by a
direct miracle from Heaven, found out what this letter
meant. The truth is, that they were not long (as few men
would be) in finding out for themselves; and it was decided to
let the conspirators alone, until the very day before the opening
of Parliament. That the conspirators had their fears, is
certain; for, Tresham himself said before them all, that they
were every one dead men; and, although even he did not take
flight, there is reason to suppose that he had warned other
persons besides Lord Mounteagle. However, they were all
firm; and Fawkes, who was a man of iron, went down every day and
night to keep watch in the cellar as usual. He was there
about two in the afternoon of the fourth, when the Lord
Chamberlain and Lord Mounteagle threw open the door and looked
in. ‘Who are you, friend?’ said they.
‘Why,’ said Fawkes, ‘I am Mr. Percy’s
servant, and am looking after his store of fuel
here.’ ‘Your master has laid in a pretty good
store,’ they returned, and shut the door, and went
away. Fawkes, upon this, posted off to the other
conspirators to tell them all was quiet, and went back and shut
himself up in the dark, black cellar again, where he heard the
bell go twelve o’clock and usher in the fifth of
November. About two hours afterwards, he slowly opened the
door, and came out to look about him, in his old prowling
way. He was instantly seized and bound, by a party of
soldiers under <span class="smcap">Sir Thomas
Knevett</span>. He had a watch upon him, some touchwood,
some tinder, some slow matches; and there was a dark lantern with
a candle in it, lighted, behind the door. He had his boots
and spurs on—to ride to the ship, I suppose—and it
was well for the soldiers that they took him so suddenly.
If they had left him but a moment’s time to light a match,
he certainly would have tossed it in among the powder, and blown
up himself and them.</p>
<p>They took him to the King’s bed-chamber first of all,
and there the King (causing him to be held very tight, and
keeping a good way off), asked him how he could have the heart to
intend to destroy so many innocent people?
‘Because,’ said Guy Fawkes, ‘desperate diseases
need desperate remedies.’ To a little Scotch
favourite, with a face like a terrier, who asked him (with no
particular wisdom) why he had collected so much gunpowder, he
replied, because he had meant to blow Scotchmen back to Scotland,
and it would take a deal of powder to do that. Next day he
was carried to the Tower, but would make no confession.
Even after being horribly tortured, he confessed nothing that the
Government did not already know; though he must have been in a
fearful state—as his signature, still preserved, in
contrast with his natural hand-writing before he was put upon the
dreadful rack, most frightfully shows. Bates, a very
different man, soon said the Jesuits had had to do with the plot,
and probably, under the torture, would as readily have said
anything. Tresham, taken and put in the Tower too, made
confessions and unmade them, and died of an illness that was
heavy upon him. Rookwood, who had stationed relays of his
own horses all the way to Dunchurch, did not mount to escape
until the middle of the day, when the news of the plot was all
over London. On the road, he came up with the two Wrights,
Catesby, and Percy; and they all galloped together into
Northamptonshire. Thence to Dunchurch, where they found the
proposed party assembled. Finding, however, that there had
been a plot, and that it had been discovered, the party
disappeared in the course of the night, and left them alone with
Sir Everard Digby. Away they all rode again, through
Warwickshire and Worcestershire, to a house called Holbeach, on
the borders of Staffordshire. They tried to raise the
Catholics on their way, but were indignantly driven off by
them. All this time they were hotly pursued by the sheriff
of Worcester, and a fast increasing concourse of riders. At
last, resolving to defend themselves at Holbeach, they shut
themselves up in the house, and put some wet powder before the
fire to dry. But it blew up, and Catesby was singed and
blackened, and almost killed, and some of the others were sadly
hurt. Still, knowing that they must die, they resolved to
die there, and with only their swords in their hands appeared at
the windows to be shot at by the sheriff and his
assistants. Catesby said to Thomas Winter, after Thomas had
been hit in the right arm which dropped powerless by his side,
‘Stand by me, Tom, and we will die
together!’—which they did, being shot through the
body by two bullets from one gun. John Wright, and
Christopher Wright, and Percy, were also shot. Rookwood and
Digby were taken: the former with a broken arm and a wound in his
body too.</p>
<p>It was the fifteenth of January, before the trial of Guy
Fawkes, and such of the other conspirators as were left alive,
came on. They were all found guilty, all hanged, drawn, and
quartered: some, in St. Paul’s Churchyard, on the top of
Ludgate-hill; some, before the Parliament House. A Jesuit
priest, named <span class="smcap">Henry Garnet</span>, to whom
the dreadful design was said to have been communicated, was taken
and tried; and two of his servants, as well as a poor priest who
was taken with him, were tortured without mercy. He himself
was not tortured, but was surrounded in the Tower by tamperers
and traitors, and so was made unfairly to convict himself out of
his own mouth. He said, upon his trial, that he had done
all he could to prevent the deed, and that he could not make
public what had been told him in confession—though I am
afraid he knew of the plot in other ways. He was found
guilty and executed, after a manful defence, and the Catholic
Church made a saint of him; some rich and powerful persons, who
had had nothing to do with the project, were fined and imprisoned
for it by the Star Chamber; the Catholics, in general, who had
recoiled with horror from the idea of the infernal contrivance,
were unjustly put under more severe laws than before; and this
was the end of the Gunpowder Plot.</p>
<h3>SECOND PART</h3>
<p>His Sowship would pretty willingly, I think, have blown the
House of Commons into the air himself; for, his dread and
jealousy of it knew no bounds all through his reign. When
he was hard pressed for money he was obliged to order it to meet,
as he could get no money without it; and when it asked him first
to abolish some of the monopolies in necessaries of life which
were a great grievance to the people, and to redress other public
wrongs, he flew into a rage and got rid of it again. At one
time he wanted it to consent to the Union of England with
Scotland, and quarrelled about that. At another time it
wanted him to put down a most infamous Church abuse, called the
High Commission Court, and he quarrelled with it about
that. At another time it entreated him not to be quite so
fond of his archbishops and bishops who made speeches in his
praise too awful to be related, but to have some little
consideration for the poor Puritan clergy who were persecuted for
preaching in their own way, and not according to the archbishops
and bishops; and they quarrelled about that. In short, what
with hating the House of Commons, and pretending not to hate it;
and what with now sending some of its members who opposed him, to
Newgate or to the Tower, and now telling the rest that they must
not presume to make speeches about the public affairs which could
not possibly concern them; and what with cajoling, and bullying,
and fighting, and being frightened; the House of Commons was the
plague of his Sowship’s existence. It was pretty
firm, however, in maintaining its rights, and insisting that the
Parliament should make the laws, and not the King by his own
single proclamations (which he tried hard to do); and his Sowship
was so often distressed for money, in consequence, that he sold
every sort of title and public office as if they were
merchandise, and even invented a new dignity called a Baronetcy,
which anybody could buy for a thousand pounds.</p>
<p>These disputes with his Parliaments, and his hunting, and his
drinking, and his lying in bed—for he was a great
sluggard—occupied his Sowship pretty well. The rest
of his time he chiefly passed in hugging and slobbering his
favourites. The first of these was <span class="smcap">Sir
Philip Herbert</span>, who had no knowledge whatever, except of
dogs, and horses, and hunting, but whom he soon made <span class="smcap">Earl of Montgomery</span>. The next, and a
much more famous one, was <span class="smcap">Robert Carr</span>,
or <span class="smcap">Ker</span> (for it is not certain which
was his right name), who came from the Border country, and whom
he soon made <span class="smcap">Viscount Rochester</span>, and
afterwards, <span class="smcap">Earl of Somerset</span>.
The way in which his Sowship doted on this handsome young man, is
even more odious to think of, than the way in which the really
great men of England condescended to bow down before him.
The favourite’s great friend was a certain <span class="smcap">Sir Thomas Overbury</span>, who wrote his
love-letters for him, and assisted him in the duties of his many
high places, which his own ignorance prevented him from
discharging. But this same Sir Thomas having just manhood
enough to dissuade the favourite from a wicked marriage with the
beautiful Countess of Essex, who was to get a divorce from her
husband for the purpose, the said Countess, in her rage, got Sir
Thomas put into the Tower, and there poisoned him. Then the
favourite and this bad woman were publicly married by the
King’s pet bishop, with as much to-do and rejoicing, as if
he had been the best man, and she the best woman, upon the face
of the earth.</p>
<p>But, after a longer sunshine than might have been
expected—of seven years or so, that is to say—another
handsome young man started up and eclipsed the <span class="smcap">Earl of Somerset</span>. This was <span class="smcap">George Villiers</span>, the youngest son of a
Leicestershire gentleman: who came to Court with all the Paris
fashions on him, and could dance as well as the best mountebank
that ever was seen. He soon danced himself into the good
graces of his Sowship, and danced the other favourite out of
favour. Then, it was all at once discovered that the Earl
and Countess of Somerset had not deserved all those great
promotions and mighty rejoicings, and they were separately tried
for the murder of Sir Thomas Overbury, and for other
crimes. But, the King was so afraid of his late
favourite’s publicly telling some disgraceful things he
knew of him—which he darkly threatened to do—that he
was even examined with two men standing, one on either side of
him, each with a cloak in his hand, ready to throw it over his
head and stop his mouth if he should break out with what he had
it in his power to tell. So, a very lame affair was
purposely made of the trial, and his punishment was an allowance
of four thousand pounds a year in retirement, while the Countess
was pardoned, and allowed to pass into retirement too. They
hated one another by this time, and lived to revile and torment
each other some years.</p>
<p>While these events were in progress, and while his Sowship was
making such an exhibition of himself, from day to day and from
year to year, as is not often seen in any sty, three remarkable
deaths took place in England. The first was that of the
Minister, Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury, who was past sixty,
and had never been strong, being deformed from his birth.
He said at last that he had no wish to live; and no Minister need
have had, with his experience of the meanness and wickedness of
those disgraceful times. The second was that of the Lady
Arabella Stuart, who alarmed his Sowship mightily, by privately
marrying <span class="smcap">William Seymour</span>, son of <span class="smcap">Lord Beauchamp</span>, who was a descendant of King
Henry the Seventh, and who, his Sowship thought, might
consequently increase and strengthen any claim she might one day
set up to the throne. She was separated from her husband
(who was put in the Tower) and thrust into a boat to be confined
at Durham. She escaped in a man’s dress to get away
in a French ship from Gravesend to France, but unhappily missed
her husband, who had escaped too, and was soon taken. She
went raving mad in the miserable Tower, and died there after four
years. The last, and the most important of these three
deaths, was that of Prince Henry, the heir to the throne, in the
nineteenth year of his age. He was a promising young
prince, and greatly liked; a quiet, well-conducted youth, of whom
two very good things are known: first, that his father was
jealous of him; secondly, that he was the friend of Sir Walter
Raleigh, languishing through all those years in the Tower, and
often said that no man but his father would keep such a bird in
such a cage. On the occasion of the preparations for the
marriage of his sister the Princess Elizabeth with a foreign
prince (and an unhappy marriage it turned out), he came from
Richmond, where he had been very ill, to greet his new
brother-in-law, at the palace at Whitehall. There he played
a great game at tennis, in his shirt, though it was very cold
weather, and was seized with an alarming illness, and died within
a fortnight of a putrid fever. For this young prince Sir
Walter Raleigh wrote, in his prison in the Tower, the beginning
of a History of the World: a wonderful instance how little his
Sowship could do to confine a great man’s mind, however
long he might imprison his body.</p>
<p>And this mention of Sir Walter Raleigh, who had many faults,
but who never showed so many merits as in trouble and adversity,
may bring me at once to the end of his sad story. After an
imprisonment in the Tower of twelve long years, he proposed to
resume those old sea voyages of his, and to go to South America
in search of gold. His Sowship, divided between his wish to
be on good terms with the Spaniards through whose territory Sir
Walter must pass (he had long had an idea of marrying Prince
Henry to a Spanish Princess), and his avaricious eagerness to get
hold of the gold, did not know what to do. But, in the end,
he set Sir Walter free, taking securities for his return; and Sir
Walter fitted out an expedition at his own coast and, on the
twenty-eighth of March, one thousand six hundred and seventeen,
sailed away in command of one of its ships, which he ominously
called the Destiny. The expedition failed; the common men,
not finding the gold they had expected, mutinied; a quarrel broke
out between Sir Walter and the Spaniards, who hated him for old
successes of his against them; and he took and burnt a little
town called <span class="smcap">Saint Thomas</span>. For
this he was denounced to his Sowship by the Spanish Ambassador as
a pirate; and returning almost broken-hearted, with his hopes and
fortunes shattered, his company of friends dispersed, and his
brave son (who had been one of them) killed, he was
taken—through the treachery of <span class="smcap">Sir
Lewis Stukely</span>, his near relation, a scoundrel and a
Vice-Admiral—and was once again immured in his prison-home
of so many years.</p>
<p>His Sowship being mightily disappointed in not getting any
gold, Sir Walter Raleigh was tried as unfairly, and with as many
lies and evasions as the judges and law officers and every other
authority in Church and State habitually practised under such a
King. After a great deal of prevarication on all parts but
his own, it was declared that he must die under his former
sentence, now fifteen years old. So, on the twenty-eighth
of October, one thousand six hundred and eighteen, he was shut up
in the Gate House at Westminster to pass his late night on earth,
and there he took leave of his good and faithful lady who was
worthy to have lived in better days. At eight o’clock
next morning, after a cheerful breakfast, and a pipe, and a cup
of good wine, he was taken to Old Palace Yard in Westminster,
where the scaffold was set up, and where so many people of high
degree were assembled to see him die, that it was a matter of
some difficulty to get him through the crowd. He behaved
most nobly, but if anything lay heavy on his mind, it was that
Earl of Essex, whose head he had seen roll off; and he solemnly
said that he had had no hand in bringing him to the block, and
that he had shed tears for him when he died. As the morning
was very cold, the Sheriff said, would he come down to a fire for
a little space, and warm himself? But Sir Walter thanked
him, and said no, he would rather it were done at once, for he
was ill of fever and ague, and in another quarter of an hour his
shaking fit would come upon him if he were still alive, and his
enemies might then suppose that he trembled for fear. With
that, he kneeled and made a very beautiful and Christian
prayer. Before he laid his head upon the block he felt the
edge of the axe, and said, with a smile upon his face, that it
was a sharp medicine, but would cure the worst disease.
When he was bent down ready for death, he said to the
executioner, finding that he hesitated, ‘What dost thou
fear? Strike, man!’ So, the axe came down and
struck his head off, in the sixty-sixth year of his age.</p>
<p>The new favourite got on fast. He was made a viscount,
he was made Duke of Buckingham, he was made a marquis, he was
made Master of the Horse, he was made Lord High Admiral—and
the Chief Commander of the gallant English forces that had
dispersed the Spanish Armada, was displaced to make room for
him. He had the whole kingdom at his disposal, and his
mother sold all the profits and honours of the State, as if she
had kept a shop. He blazed all over with diamonds and other
precious stones, from his hatband and his earrings to his
shoes. Yet he was an ignorant presumptuous, swaggering
compound of knave and fool, with nothing but his beauty and his
dancing to recommend him. This is the gentleman who called
himself his Majesty’s dog and slave, and called his Majesty
Your Sowship. His Sowship called him <span class="smcap">Steenie</span>; it is supposed, because that was a
nickname for Stephen, and because St. Stephen was generally
represented in pictures as a handsome saint.</p>
<p>His Sowship was driven sometimes to his wits’-end by his
trimming between the general dislike of the Catholic religion at
home, and his desire to wheedle and flatter it abroad, as his
only means of getting a rich princess for his son’s wife: a
part of whose fortune he might cram into his greasy
pockets. Prince Charles—or as his Sowship called him,
Baby Charles—being now <span class="smcap">Prince of
Wales</span>, the old project of a marriage with the Spanish
King’s daughter had been revived for him; and as she could
not marry a Protestant without leave from the Pope, his Sowship
himself secretly and meanly wrote to his Infallibility, asking
for it. The negotiation for this Spanish marriage takes up
a larger space in great books, than you can imagine, but the
upshot of it all is, that when it had been held off by the
Spanish Court for a long time, Baby Charles and Steenie set off
in disguise as Mr. Thomas Smith and Mr. John Smith, to see the
Spanish Princess; that Baby Charles pretended to be desperately
in love with her, and jumped off walls to look at her, and made a
considerable fool of himself in a good many ways; that she was
called Princess of Wales and that the whole Spanish Court
believed Baby Charles to be all but dying for her sake, as he
expressly told them he was; that Baby Charles and Steenie came
back to England, and were received with as much rapture as if
they had been a blessing to it; that Baby Charles had actually
fallen in love with <span class="smcap">Henrietta Maria</span>,
the French King’s sister, whom he had seen in Paris; that
he thought it a wonderfully fine and princely thing to have
deceived the Spaniards, all through; and that he openly said,
with a chuckle, as soon as he was safe and sound at home again,
that the Spaniards were great fools to have believed him.</p>
<p>Like most dishonest men, the Prince and the favourite
complained that the people whom they had deluded were
dishonest. They made such misrepresentations of the
treachery of the Spaniards in this business of the Spanish match,
that the English nation became eager for a war with them.
Although the gravest Spaniards laughed at the idea of his Sowship
in a warlike attitude, the Parliament granted money for the
beginning of hostilities, and the treaties with Spain were
publicly declared to be at an end. The Spanish ambassador
in London—probably with the help of the fallen favourite,
the Earl of Somerset—being unable to obtain speech with his
Sowship, slipped a paper into his hand, declaring that he was a
prisoner in his own house, and was entirely governed by
Buckingham and his creatures. The first effect of this
letter was that his Sowship began to cry and whine, and took Baby
Charles away from Steenie, and went down to Windsor, gabbling all
sorts of nonsense. The end of it was that his Sowship
hugged his dog and slave, and said he was quite satisfied.</p>
<p>He had given the Prince and the favourite almost unlimited
power to settle anything with the Pope as to the Spanish
marriage; and he now, with a view to the French one, signed a
treaty that all Roman Catholics in England should exercise their
religion freely, and should never be required to take any oath
contrary thereto. In return for this, and for other
concessions much less to be defended, Henrietta Maria was to
become the Prince’s wife, and was to bring him a fortune of
eight hundred thousand crowns.</p>
<p>His Sowship’s eyes were getting red with eagerly looking
for the money, when the end of a gluttonous life came upon him;
and, after a fortnight’s illness, on Sunday the
twenty-seventh of March, one thousand six hundred and
twenty-five, he died. He had reigned twenty-two years, and
was fifty-nine years old. I know of nothing more abominable
in history than the adulation that was lavished on this King, and
the vice and corruption that such a barefaced habit of lying
produced in his court. It is much to be doubted whether one
man of honour, and not utterly self-disgraced, kept his place
near James the First. Lord Bacon, that able and wise
philosopher, as the First Judge in the Kingdom in this reign,
became a public spectacle of dishonesty and corruption; and in
his base flattery of his Sowship, and in his crawling servility
to his dog and slave, disgraced himself even more. But, a
creature like his Sowship set upon a throne is like the Plague,
and everybody receives infection from him.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />