<h2>CHAPTER XXXV—ENGLAND UNDER CHARLES THE SECOND, CALLED THE MERRY MONARCH</h2>
<p>There never were such profligate times in England as under
Charles the Second. Whenever you see his portrait, with his
swarthy, ill-looking face and great nose, you may fancy him in
his Court at Whitehall, surrounded by some of the very worst
vagabonds in the kingdom (though they were lords and ladies),
drinking, gambling, indulging in vicious conversation, and
committing every kind of profligate excess. It has been a
fashion to call Charles the Second ‘The Merry
Monarch.’ Let me try to give you a general idea of
some of the merry things that were done, in the merry days when
this merry gentleman sat upon his merry throne, in merry
England.</p>
<p>The first merry proceeding was—of course—to
declare that he was one of the greatest, the wisest, and the
noblest kings that ever shone, like the blessed sun itself, on
this benighted earth. The next merry and pleasant piece of
business was, for the Parliament, in the humblest manner, to give
him one million two hundred thousand pounds a year, and to settle
upon him for life that old disputed tonnage and poundage which
had been so bravely fought for. Then, General Monk being
made <span class="smcap">Earl of Albemarle</span>, and a few
other Royalists similarly rewarded, the law went to work to see
what was to be done to those persons (they were called Regicides)
who had been concerned in making a martyr of the late King.
Ten of these were merrily executed; that is to say, six of the
judges, one of the council, Colonel Hacker and another officer
who had commanded the Guards, and <span class="smcap">Hugh
Peters</span>, a preacher who had preached against the martyr
with all his heart. These executions were so extremely
merry, that every horrible circumstance which Cromwell had
abandoned was revived with appalling cruelty. The hearts of
the sufferers were torn out of their living bodies; their bowels
were burned before their faces; the executioner cut jokes to the
next victim, as he rubbed his filthy hands together, that were
reeking with the blood of the last; and the heads of the dead
were drawn on sledges with the living to the place of
suffering. Still, even so merry a monarch could not force
one of these dying men to say that he was sorry for what he had
done. Nay, the most memorable thing said among them was,
that if the thing were to do again they would do it.</p>
<p>Sir Harry Vane, who had furnished the evidence against
Strafford, and was one of the most staunch of the Republicans,
was also tried, found guilty, and ordered for execution.
When he came upon the scaffold on Tower Hill, after conducting
his own defence with great power, his notes of what he had meant
to say to the people were torn away from him, and the drums and
trumpets were ordered to sound lustily and drown his voice; for,
the people had been so much impressed by what the Regicides had
calmly said with their last breath, that it was the custom now,
to have the drums and trumpets always under the scaffold, ready
to strike up. Vane said no more than this: ‘It is a
bad cause which cannot bear the words of a dying man:’ and
bravely died.</p>
<p>These merry scenes were succeeded by another, perhaps even
merrier. On the anniversary of the late King’s death,
the bodies of Oliver Cromwell, Ireton, and Bradshaw, were torn
out of their graves in Westminster Abbey, dragged to Tyburn,
hanged there on a gallows all day long, and then beheaded.
Imagine the head of Oliver Cromwell set upon a pole to be stared
at by a brutal crowd, not one of whom would have dared to look
the living Oliver in the face for half a moment! Think,
after you have read this reign, what England was under Oliver
Cromwell who was torn out of his grave, and what it was under
this merry monarch who sold it, like a merry Judas, over and over
again.</p>
<p>Of course, the remains of Oliver’s wife and daughter
were not to be spared either, though they had been most excellent
women. The base clergy of that time gave up their bodies,
which had been buried in the Abbey, and—to the eternal
disgrace of England—they were thrown into a pit, together
with the mouldering bones of Pym and of the brave and bold old
Admiral Blake.</p>
<p>The clergy acted this disgraceful part because they hoped to
get the nonconformists, or dissenters, thoroughly put down in
this reign, and to have but one prayer-book and one service for
all kinds of people, no matter what their private opinions
were. This was pretty well, I think, for a Protestant
Church, which had displaced the Romish Church because people had
a right to their own opinions in religious matters.
However, they carried it with a high hand, and a prayer-book was
agreed upon, in which the extremest opinions of Archbishop Laud
were not forgotten. An Act was passed, too, preventing any
dissenter from holding any office under any corporation.
So, the regular clergy in their triumph were soon as merry as the
King. The army being by this time disbanded, and the King
crowned, everything was to go on easily for evermore.</p>
<p>I must say a word here about the King’s family. He
had not been long upon the throne when his brother the Duke of
Gloucester, and his sister the <span class="smcap">Princess of
Orange</span>, died within a few months of each other, of
small-pox. His remaining sister, the <span class="smcap">Princess Henrietta</span>, married the <span class="smcap">Duke of Orleans</span>, the brother of <span class="smcap">Louis the Fourteenth</span>, King of France.
His brother <span class="smcap">James</span>, <span class="smcap">Duke of York</span>, was made High Admiral, and
by-and-by became a Catholic. He was a gloomy, sullen,
bilious sort of man, with a remarkable partiality for the ugliest
women in the country. He married, under very discreditable
circumstances, <span class="smcap">Anne Hyde</span>, the daughter
of <span class="smcap">Lord Clarendon</span>, then the
King’s principal Minister—not at all a delicate
minister either, but doing much of the dirty work of a very dirty
palace. It became important now that the King himself
should be married; and divers foreign Monarchs, not very
particular about the character of their son-in-law, proposed
their daughters to him. The <span class="smcap">King of
Portugal</span> offered his daughter, <span class="smcap">Catherine of Braganza</span>, and fifty thousand
pounds: in addition to which, the French King, who was favourable
to that match, offered a loan of another fifty thousand.
The King of Spain, on the other hand, offered any one out of a
dozen of Princesses, and other hopes of gain. But the ready
money carried the day, and Catherine came over in state to her
merry marriage.</p>
<p>The whole Court was a great flaunting crowd of debauched men
and shameless women; and Catherine’s merry husband insulted
and outraged her in every possible way, until she consented to
receive those worthless creatures as her very good friends, and
to degrade herself by their companionship. A <span class="smcap">Mrs. Palmer</span>, whom the King made <span class="smcap">Lady Castlemaine</span>, and afterwards <span class="smcap">Duchess of Cleveland</span>, was one of the most
powerful of the bad women about the Court, and had great
influence with the King nearly all through his reign.
Another merry lady named <span class="smcap">Moll Davies</span>,
a dancer at the theatre, was afterwards her rival. So was
<span class="smcap">Nell Gwyn</span>, first an orange girl and
then an actress, who really had good in her, and of whom one of
the worst things I know is, that actually she does seem to have
been fond of the King. The first <span class="smcap">Duke
of St. Albans</span> was this orange girl’s child. In
like manner the son of a merry waiting-lady, whom the King
created <span class="smcap">Duchess Of Portsmouth</span>, became
the <span class="smcap">Duke of Richmond</span>. Upon the
whole it is not so bad a thing to be a commoner.</p>
<p>The Merry Monarch was so exceedingly merry among these merry
ladies, and some equally merry (and equally infamous) lords and
gentlemen, that he soon got through his hundred thousand pounds,
and then, by way of raising a little pocket-money, made a merry
bargain. He sold Dunkirk to the French King for five
millions of livres. When I think of the dignity to which
Oliver Cromwell raised England in the eyes of foreign powers, and
when I think of the manner in which he gained for England this
very Dunkirk, I am much inclined to consider that if the Merry
Monarch had been made to follow his father for this action, he
would have received his just deserts.</p>
<p>Though he was like his father in none of that father’s
greater qualities, he was like him in being worthy of no
trust. When he sent that letter to the Parliament, from
Breda, he did expressly promise that all sincere religious
opinions should be respected. Yet he was no sooner firm in
his power than he consented to one of the worst Acts of
Parliament ever passed. Under this law, every minister who
should not give his solemn assent to the Prayer-Book by a certain
day, was declared to be a minister no longer, and to be deprived
of his church. The consequence of this was that some two
thousand honest men were taken from their congregations, and
reduced to dire poverty and distress. It was followed by
another outrageous law, called the Conventicle Act, by which any
person above the age of sixteen who was present at any religious
service not according to the Prayer-Book, was to be imprisoned
three months for the first offence, six for the second, and to be
transported for the third. This Act alone filled the
prisons, which were then most dreadful dungeons, to
overflowing.</p>
<p>The Covenanters in Scotland had already fared no better.
A base Parliament, usually known as the Drunken Parliament, in
consequence of its principal members being seldom sober, had been
got together to make laws against the Covenanters, and to force
all men to be of one mind in religious matters. The <span class="smcap">Marquis of Argyle</span>, relying on the
King’s honour, had given himself up to him; but, he was
wealthy, and his enemies wanted his wealth. He was tried
for treason, on the evidence of some private letters in which he
had expressed opinions—as well he might—more
favourable to the government of the late Lord Protector than of
the present merry and religious King. He was executed, as
were two men of mark among the Covenanters; and <span class="smcap">Sharp</span>, a traitor who had once been the
friend of the Presbyterians and betrayed them, was made
Archbishop of St. Andrew’s, to teach the Scotch how to like
bishops.</p>
<p>Things being in this merry state at home, the Merry Monarch
undertook a war with the Dutch; principally because they
interfered with an African company, established with the two
objects of buying gold-dust and slaves, of which the Duke of York
was a leading member. After some preliminary hostilities,
the said Duke sailed to the coast of Holland with a fleet of
ninety-eight vessels of war, and four fire-ships. This
engaged with the Dutch fleet, of no fewer than one hundred and
thirteen ships. In the great battle between the two forces,
the Dutch lost eighteen ships, four admirals, and seven thousand
men. But, the English on shore were in no mood of
exultation when they heard the news.</p>
<p>For, this was the year and the time of the Great Plague in
London. During the winter of one thousand six hundred and
sixty-four it had been whispered about, that some few people had
died here and there of the disease called the Plague, in some of
the unwholesome suburbs around London. News was not
published at that time as it is now, and some people believed
these rumours, and some disbelieved them, and they were soon
forgotten. But, in the month of May, one thousand six
hundred and sixty-five, it began to be said all over the town
that the disease had burst out with great violence in St.
Giles’s, and that the people were dying in great
numbers. This soon turned out to be awfully true. The
roads out of London were choked up by people endeavouring to
escape from the infected city, and large sums were paid for any
kind of conveyance. The disease soon spread so fast, that
it was necessary to shut up the houses in which sick people were,
and to cut them off from communication with the living.
Every one of these houses was marked on the outside of the door
with a red cross, and the words, Lord, have mercy upon us!
The streets were all deserted, grass grew in the public ways, and
there was a dreadful silence in the air. When night came
on, dismal rumblings used to be heard, and these were the wheels
of the death-carts, attended by men with veiled faces and holding
cloths to their mouths, who rang doleful bells and cried in a
loud and solemn voice, ‘Bring out your dead!’
The corpses put into these carts were buried by torchlight in
great pits; no service being performed over them; all men being
afraid to stay for a moment on the brink of the ghastly
graves. In the general fear, children ran away from their
parents, and parents from their children. Some who were
taken ill, died alone, and without any help. Some were
stabbed or strangled by hired nurses who robbed them of all their
money, and stole the very beds on which they lay. Some went
mad, dropped from the windows, ran through the streets, and in
their pain and frenzy flung themselves into the river.</p>
<p>These were not all the horrors of the time. The wicked
and dissolute, in wild desperation, sat in the taverns singing
roaring songs, and were stricken as they drank, and went out and
died. The fearful and superstitious persuaded themselves
that they saw supernatural sights—burning swords in the
sky, gigantic arms and darts. Others pretended that at
nights vast crowds of ghosts walked round and round the dismal
pits. One madman, naked, and carrying a brazier full of
burning coals upon his head, stalked through the streets, crying
out that he was a Prophet, commissioned to denounce the vengeance
of the Lord on wicked London. Another always went to and
fro, exclaiming, ‘Yet forty days, and London shall be
destroyed!’ A third awoke the echoes in the dismal
streets, by night and by day, and made the blood of the sick run
cold, by calling out incessantly, in a deep hoarse voice,
‘O, the great and dreadful God!’</p>
<p>Through the months of July and August and September, the Great
Plague raged more and more. Great fires were lighted in the
streets, in the hope of stopping the infection; but there was a
plague of rain too, and it beat the fires out. At last, the
winds which usually arise at that time of the year which is
called the equinox, when day and night are of equal length all
over the world, began to blow, and to purify the wretched
town. The deaths began to decrease, the red crosses slowly
to disappear, the fugitives to return, the shops to open, pale
frightened faces to be seen in the streets. The Plague had
been in every part of England, but in close and unwholesome
London it had killed one hundred thousand people.</p>
<p>All this time, the Merry Monarch was as merry as ever, and as
worthless as ever. All this time, the debauched lords and
gentlemen and the shameless ladies danced and gamed and drank,
and loved and hated one another, according to their merry
ways.</p>
<p>So little humanity did the government learn from the late
affliction, that one of the first things the Parliament did when
it met at Oxford (being as yet afraid to come to London), was to
make a law, called the Five Mile Act, expressly directed against
those poor ministers who, in the time of the Plague, had manfully
come back to comfort the unhappy people. This infamous law,
by forbidding them to teach in any school, or to come within five
miles of any city, town, or village, doomed them to starvation
and death.</p>
<p>The fleet had been at sea, and healthy. The King of
France was now in alliance with the Dutch, though his navy was
chiefly employed in looking on while the English and Dutch
fought. The Dutch gained one victory; and the English
gained another and a greater; and Prince Rupert, one of the
English admirals, was out in the Channel one windy night, looking
for the French Admiral, with the intention of giving him
something more to do than he had had yet, when the gale increased
to a storm, and blew him into Saint Helen’s. That
night was the third of September, one thousand six hundred and
sixty-six, and that wind fanned the Great Fire of London.</p>
<p>It broke out at a baker’s shop near London Bridge, on
the spot on which the Monument now stands as a remembrance of
those raging flames. It spread and spread, and burned and
burned, for three days. The nights were lighter than the
days; in the daytime there was an immense cloud of smoke, and in
the night-time there was a great tower of fire mounting up into
the sky, which lighted the whole country landscape for ten miles
round. Showers of hot ashes rose into the air and fell on
distant places; flying sparks carried the conflagration to great
distances, and kindled it in twenty new spots at a time; church
steeples fell down with tremendous crashes; houses crumbled into
cinders by the hundred and the thousand. The summer had
been intensely hot and dry, the streets were very narrow, and the
houses mostly built of wood and plaster. Nothing could stop
the tremendous fire, but the want of more houses to burn; nor did
it stop until the whole way from the Tower to Temple Bar was a
desert, composed of the ashes of thirteen thousand houses and
eighty-nine churches.</p>
<p>This was a terrible visitation at the time, and occasioned
great loss and suffering to the two hundred thousand burnt-out
people, who were obliged to lie in the fields under the open
night sky, or in hastily-made huts of mud and straw, while the
lanes and roads were rendered impassable by carts which had
broken down as they tried to save their goods. But the Fire
was a great blessing to the City afterwards, for it arose from
its ruins very much improved—built more regularly, more
widely, more cleanly and carefully, and therefore much more
healthily. It might be far more healthy than it is, but
there are some people in it still—even now, at this time,
nearly two hundred years later—so selfish, so pig-headed,
and so ignorant, that I doubt if even another Great Fire would
warm them up to do their duty.</p>
<p>The Catholics were accused of having wilfully set London in
flames; one poor Frenchman, who had been mad for years, even
accused himself of having with his own hand fired the first
house. There is no reasonable doubt, however, that the fire
was accidental. An inscription on the Monument long
attributed it to the Catholics; but it is removed now, and was
always a malicious and stupid untruth.</p>
<h3>SECOND PART</h3>
<p>That the Merry Monarch might be very merry indeed, in the
merry times when his people were suffering under pestilence and
fire, he drank and gambled and flung away among his favourites
the money which the Parliament had voted for the war. The
consequence of this was that the stout-hearted English sailors
were merrily starving of want, and dying in the streets; while
the Dutch, under their admirals <span class="smcap">De
Witt</span> and <span class="smcap">De Ruyter</span>, came into
the River Thames, and up the River Medway as far as Upnor, burned
the guard-ships, silenced the weak batteries, and did what they
would to the English coast for six whole weeks. Most of the
English ships that could have prevented them had neither powder
nor shot on board; in this merry reign, public officers made
themselves as merry as the King did with the public money; and
when it was entrusted to them to spend in national defences or
preparations, they put it into their own pockets with the
merriest grace in the world.</p>
<p>Lord Clarendon had, by this time, run as long a course as is
usually allotted to the unscrupulous ministers of bad
kings. He was impeached by his political opponents, but
unsuccessfully. The King then commanded him to withdraw
from England and retire to France, which he did, after defending
himself in writing. He was no great loss at home, and died
abroad some seven years afterwards.</p>
<p>There then came into power a ministry called the Cabal
Ministry, because it was composed of <span class="smcap">Lord
Clifford</span>, the <span class="smcap">Earl of
Arlington</span>, the <span class="smcap">Duke of
Buckingham</span> (a great rascal, and the King’s most
powerful favourite), <span class="smcap">Lord Ashley</span>, and
the <span class="smcap">Duke of Lauderdale</span>, <span class="smcap">c. a. b. a. l.</span> As the French were
making conquests in Flanders, the first Cabal proceeding was to
make a treaty with the Dutch, for uniting with Spain to oppose
the French. It was no sooner made than the Merry Monarch,
who always wanted to get money without being accountable to a
Parliament for his expenditure, apologised to the King of France
for having had anything to do with it, and concluded a secret
treaty with him, making himself his infamous pensioner to the
amount of two millions of livres down, and three millions more a
year; and engaging to desert that very Spain, to make war against
those very Dutch, and to declare himself a Catholic when a
convenient time should arrive. This religious king had
lately been crying to his Catholic brother on the subject of his
strong desire to be a Catholic; and now he merrily concluded this
treasonable conspiracy against the country he governed, by
undertaking to become one as soon as he safely could. For
all of which, though he had had ten merry heads instead of one,
he richly deserved to lose them by the headsman’s axe.</p>
<p>As his one merry head might have been far from safe, if these
things had been known, they were kept very quiet, and war was
declared by France and England against the Dutch. But, a
very uncommon man, afterwards most important to English history
and to the religion and liberty of this land, arose among them,
and for many long years defeated the whole projects of
France. This was <span class="smcap">William of
Nassau</span>, <span class="smcap">Prince of Orange</span>, son
of the last Prince of Orange of the same name, who married the
daughter of Charles the First of England. He was a young
man at this time, only just of age; but he was brave, cool,
intrepid, and wise. His father had been so detested that,
upon his death, the Dutch had abolished the authority to which
this son would have otherwise succeeded (Stadtholder it was
called), and placed the chief power in the hands of <span class="smcap">John de Witt</span>, who educated this young
prince. Now, the Prince became very popular, and John de
Witt’s brother <span class="smcap">Cornelius</span> was
sentenced to banishment on a false accusation of conspiring to
kill him. John went to the prison where he was, to take him
away to exile, in his coach; and a great mob who collected on the
occasion, then and there cruelly murdered both the
brothers. This left the government in the hands of the
Prince, who was really the choice of the nation; and from this
time he exercised it with the greatest vigour, against the whole
power of France, under its famous generals <span class="smcap">Condé</span> and <span class="smcap">Turenne</span>, and in support of the Protestant
religion. It was full seven years before this war ended in
a treaty of peace made at Nimeguen, and its details would occupy
a very considerable space. It is enough to say that William
of Orange established a famous character with the whole world;
and that the Merry Monarch, adding to and improving on his former
baseness, bound himself to do everything the King of France
liked, and nothing the King of France did not like, for a pension
of one hundred thousand pounds a year, which was afterwards
doubled. Besides this, the King of France, by means of his
corrupt ambassador—who wrote accounts of his proceedings in
England, which are not always to be believed, I
think—bought our English members of Parliament, as he
wanted them. So, in point of fact, during a considerable
portion of this merry reign, the King of France was the real King
of this country.</p>
<p>But there was a better time to come, and it was to come
(though his royal uncle little thought so) through that very
William, Prince of Orange. He came over to England, saw
Mary, the elder daughter of the Duke of York, and married
her. We shall see by-and-by what came of that marriage, and
why it is never to be forgotten.</p>
<p>This daughter was a Protestant, but her mother died a
Catholic. She and her sister <span class="smcap">Anne</span>, also a Protestant, were the only
survivors of eight children. Anne afterwards married <span class="smcap">George</span>, <span class="smcap">Prince of
Denmark</span>, brother to the King of that country.</p>
<p>Lest you should do the Merry Monarch the injustice of
supposing that he was even good humoured (except when he had
everything his own way), or that he was high spirited and
honourable, I will mention here what was done to a member of the
House of Commons, <span class="smcap">Sir John
Coventry</span>. He made a remark in a debate about taxing
the theatres, which gave the King offence. The King agreed
with his illegitimate son, who had been born abroad, and whom he
had made <span class="smcap">Duke of Monmouth</span>, to take the
following merry vengeance. To waylay him at night, fifteen
armed men to one, and to slit his nose with a penknife.
Like master, like man. The King’s favourite, the Duke
of Buckingham, was strongly suspected of setting on an assassin
to murder the <span class="smcap">Duke of Ormond</span> as he was
returning home from a dinner; and that Duke’s spirited son,
<span class="smcap">Lord Ossory</span>, was so persuaded of his
guilt, that he said to him at Court, even as he stood beside the
King, ‘My lord, I know very well that you are at the bottom
of this late attempt upon my father. But I give you
warning, if he ever come to a violent end, his blood shall be
upon you, and wherever I meet you I will pistol you! I will
do so, though I find you standing behind the King’s chair;
and I tell you this in his Majesty’s presence, that you may
be quite sure of my doing what I threaten.’ Those
were merry times indeed.</p>
<p>There was a fellow named <span class="smcap">Blood</span>, who
was seized for making, with two companions, an audacious attempt
to steal the crown, the globe, and sceptre, from the place where
the jewels were kept in the Tower. This robber, who was a
swaggering ruffian, being taken, declared that he was the man who
had endeavoured to kill the Duke of Ormond, and that he had meant
to kill the King too, but was overawed by the majesty of his
appearance, when he might otherwise have done it, as he was
bathing at Battersea. The King being but an ill-looking
fellow, I don’t believe a word of this. Whether he
was flattered, or whether he knew that Buckingham had really set
Blood on to murder the Duke, is uncertain. But it is quite
certain that he pardoned this thief, gave him an estate of five
hundred a year in Ireland (which had had the honour of giving him
birth), and presented him at Court to the debauched lords and the
shameless ladies, who made a great deal of him—as I have no
doubt they would have made of the Devil himself, if the King had
introduced him.</p>
<p>Infamously pensioned as he was, the King still wanted money,
and consequently was obliged to call Parliaments. In these,
the great object of the Protestants was to thwart the Catholic
Duke of York, who married a second time; his new wife being a
young lady only fifteen years old, the Catholic sister of the
<span class="smcap">Duke of Modena</span>. In this they
were seconded by the Protestant Dissenters, though to their own
disadvantage: since, to exclude Catholics from power, they were
even willing to exclude themselves. The King’s object
was to pretend to be a Protestant, while he was really a
Catholic; to swear to the bishops that he was devoutly attached
to the English Church, while he knew he had bargained it away to
the King of France; and by cheating and deceiving them, and all
who were attached to royalty, to become despotic and be powerful
enough to confess what a rascal he was. Meantime, the King
of France, knowing his merry pensioner well, intrigued with the
King’s opponents in Parliament, as well as with the King
and his friends.</p>
<p>The fears that the country had of the Catholic religion being
restored, if the Duke of York should come to the throne, and the
low cunning of the King in pretending to share their alarms, led
to some very terrible results. A certain <span class="smcap">Dr. Tonge</span>, a dull clergyman in the City,
fell into the hands of a certain <span class="smcap">Titus
Oates</span>, a most infamous character, who pretended to have
acquired among the Jesuits abroad a knowledge of a great plot for
the murder of the King, and the re-establishment if the Catholic
religion. Titus Oates, being produced by this unlucky Dr.
Tonge and solemnly examined before the council, contradicted
himself in a thousand ways, told the most ridiculous and
improbable stories, and implicated <span class="smcap">Coleman</span>, the Secretary of the Duchess of
York. Now, although what he charged against Coleman was not
true, and although you and I know very well that the real
dangerous Catholic plot was that one with the King of France of
which the Merry Monarch was himself the head, there happened to
be found among Coleman’s papers, some letters, in which he
did praise the days of Bloody Queen Mary, and abuse the
Protestant religion. This was great good fortune for Titus,
as it seemed to confirm him; but better still was in store.
<span class="smcap">Sir Edmundbury Godfrey</span>, the magistrate
who had first examined him, being unexpectedly found dead near
Primrose Hill, was confidently believed to have been killed by
the Catholics. I think there is no doubt that he had been
melancholy mad, and that he killed himself; but he had a great
Protestant funeral, and Titus was called the Saver of the Nation,
and received a pension of twelve hundred pounds a year.</p>
<p>As soon as Oates’s wickedness had met with this success,
up started another villain, named <span class="smcap">William
Bedloe</span>, who, attracted by a reward of five hundred pounds
offered for the apprehension of the murderers of Godfrey, came
forward and charged two Jesuits and some other persons with
having committed it at the Queen’s desire. Oates,
going into partnership with this new informer, had the audacity
to accuse the poor Queen herself of high treason. Then
appeared a third informer, as bad as either of the two, and
accused a Catholic banker named <span class="smcap">Stayley</span> of having said that the King was the
greatest rogue in the world (which would not have been far from
the truth), and that he would kill him with his own hand.
This banker, being at once tried and executed, Coleman and two
others were tried and executed. Then, a miserable wretch
named <span class="smcap">Prance</span>, a Catholic silversmith,
being accused by Bedloe, was tortured into confessing that he had
taken part in Godfrey’s murder, and into accusing three
other men of having committed it. Then, five Jesuits were
accused by Oates, Bedloe, and Prance together, and were all found
guilty, and executed on the same kind of contradictory and absurd
evidence. The Queen’s physician and three monks were
next put on their trial; but Oates and Bedloe had for the time
gone far enough and these four were acquitted. The public
mind, however, was so full of a Catholic plot, and so strong
against the Duke of York, that James consented to obey a written
order from his brother, and to go with his family to Brussels,
provided that his rights should never be sacrificed in his
absence to the Duke of Monmouth. The House of Commons, not
satisfied with this as the King hoped, passed a bill to exclude
the Duke from ever succeeding to the throne. In return, the
King dissolved the Parliament. He had deserted his old
favourite, the Duke of Buckingham, who was now in the
opposition.</p>
<p>To give any sufficient idea of the miseries of Scotland in
this merry reign, would occupy a hundred pages. Because the
people would not have bishops, and were resolved to stand by
their solemn League and Covenant, such cruelties were inflicted
upon them as make the blood run cold. Ferocious dragoons
galloped through the country to punish the peasants for deserting
the churches; sons were hanged up at their fathers’ doors
for refusing to disclose where their fathers were concealed;
wives were tortured to death for not betraying their husbands;
people were taken out of their fields and gardens, and shot on
the public roads without trial; lighted matches were tied to the
fingers of prisoners, and a most horrible torment called the Boot
was invented, and constantly applied, which ground and mashed the
victims’ legs with iron wedges. Witnesses were
tortured as well as prisoners. All the prisons were full;
all the gibbets were heavy with bodies; murder and plunder
devastated the whole country. In spite of all, the
Covenanters were by no means to be dragged into the churches, and
persisted in worshipping God as they thought right. A body
of ferocious Highlanders, turned upon them from the mountains of
their own country, had no greater effect than the English
dragoons under <span class="smcap">Grahame of Claverhouse</span>,
the most cruel and rapacious of all their enemies, whose name
will ever be cursed through the length and breadth of
Scotland. Archbishop Sharp had ever aided and abetted all
these outrages. But he fell at last; for, when the injuries
of the Scottish people were at their height, he was seen, in his
coach-and-six coming across a moor, by a body of men, headed by
one <span class="smcap">John Balfour</span>, who were waiting for
another of their oppressors. Upon this they cried out that
Heaven had delivered him into their hands, and killed him with
many wounds. If ever a man deserved such a death, I think
Archbishop Sharp did.</p>
<p>It made a great noise directly, and the Merry
Monarch—strongly suspected of having goaded the Scottish
people on, that he might have an excuse for a greater army than
the Parliament were willing to give him—sent down his son,
the Duke of Monmouth, as commander-in-chief, with instructions to
attack the Scottish rebels, or Whigs as they were called,
whenever he came up with them. Marching with ten thousand
men from Edinburgh, he found them, in number four or five
thousand, drawn up at Bothwell Bridge, by the Clyde. They
were soon dispersed; and Monmouth showed a more humane character
towards them, than he had shown towards that Member of Parliament
whose nose he had caused to be slit with a penknife. But
the Duke of Lauderdale was their bitter foe, and sent Claverhouse
to finish them.</p>
<p>As the Duke of York became more and more unpopular, the Duke
of Monmouth became more and more popular. It would have
been decent in the latter not to have voted in favour of the
renewed bill for the exclusion of James from the throne; but he
did so, much to the King’s amusement, who used to sit in
the House of Lords by the fire, hearing the debates, which he
said were as good as a play. The House of Commons passed
the bill by a large majority, and it was carried up to the House
of Lords by <span class="smcap">Lord Russell</span>, one of the
best of the leaders on the Protestant side. It was rejected
there, chiefly because the bishops helped the King to get rid of
it; and the fear of Catholic plots revived again. There had
been another got up, by a fellow out of Newgate, named <span class="smcap">Dangerfield</span>, which is more famous than it
deserves to be, under the name of the <span class="smcap">Meal-Tub Plot</span>. This jail-bird having
been got out of Newgate by a <span class="smcap">Mrs.
Cellier</span>, a Catholic nurse, had turned Catholic himself,
and pretended that he knew of a plot among the Presbyterians
against the King’s life. This was very pleasant to
the Duke of York, who hated the Presbyterians, who returned the
compliment. He gave Dangerfield twenty guineas, and sent
him to the King his brother. But Dangerfield, breaking down
altogether in his charge, and being sent back to Newgate, almost
astonished the Duke out of his five senses by suddenly swearing
that the Catholic nurse had put that false design into his head,
and that what he really knew about, was, a Catholic plot against
the King; the evidence of which would be found in some papers,
concealed in a meal-tub in Mrs. Cellier’s house.
There they were, of course—for he had put them there
himself—and so the tub gave the name to the plot.
But, the nurse was acquitted on her trial, and it came to
nothing.</p>
<p>Lord Ashley, of the Cabal, was now Lord Shaftesbury, and was
strong against the succession of the Duke of York. The
House of Commons, aggravated to the utmost extent, as we may well
suppose, by suspicions of the King’s conspiracy with the
King of France, made a desperate point of the exclusion, still,
and were bitter against the Catholics generally. So
unjustly bitter were they, I grieve to say, that they impeached
the venerable Lord Stafford, a Catholic nobleman seventy years
old, of a design to kill the King. The witnesses were that
atrocious Oates and two other birds of the same feather. He
was found guilty, on evidence quite as foolish as it was false,
and was beheaded on Tower Hill. The people were opposed to
him when he first appeared upon the scaffold; but, when he had
addressed them and shown them how innocent he was and how
wickedly he was sent there, their better nature was aroused, and
they said, ‘We believe you, my Lord. God bless you,
my Lord!’</p>
<p>The House of Commons refused to let the King have any money
until he should consent to the Exclusion Bill; but, as he could
get it and did get it from his master the King of France, he
could afford to hold them very cheap. He called a
Parliament at Oxford, to which he went down with a great show of
being armed and protected as if he were in danger of his life,
and to which the opposition members also went armed and
protected, alleging that they were in fear of the Papists, who
were numerous among the King’s guards. However, they
went on with the Exclusion Bill, and were so earnest upon it that
they would have carried it again, if the King had not popped his
crown and state robes into a sedan-chair, bundled himself into it
along with them, hurried down to the chamber where the House of
Lords met, and dissolved the Parliament. After which he
scampered home, and the members of Parliament scampered home too,
as fast as their legs could carry them.</p>
<p>The Duke of York, then residing in Scotland, had, under the
law which excluded Catholics from public trust, no right whatever
to public employment. Nevertheless, he was openly employed
as the King’s representative in Scotland, and there
gratified his sullen and cruel nature to his heart’s
content by directing the dreadful cruelties against the
Covenanters. There were two ministers named <span class="smcap">Cargill</span> and <span class="smcap">Cameron</span> who had escaped from the battle of
Bothwell Bridge, and who returned to Scotland, and raised the
miserable but still brave and unsubdued Covenanters afresh, under
the name of Cameronians. As Cameron publicly posted a
declaration that the King was a forsworn tyrant, no mercy was
shown to his unhappy followers after he was slain in
battle. The Duke of York, who was particularly fond of the
Boot and derived great pleasure from having it applied, offered
their lives to some of these people, if they would cry on the
scaffold ‘God save the King!’ But their
relations, friends, and countrymen, had been so barbarously
tortured and murdered in this merry reign, that they preferred to
die, and did die. The Duke then obtained his merry
brother’s permission to hold a Parliament in Scotland,
which first, with most shameless deceit, confirmed the laws for
securing the Protestant religion against Popery, and then
declared that nothing must or should prevent the succession of
the Popish Duke. After this double-faced beginning, it
established an oath which no human being could understand, but
which everybody was to take, as a proof that his religion was the
lawful religion. The Earl of Argyle, taking it with the
explanation that he did not consider it to prevent him from
favouring any alteration either in the Church or State which was
not inconsistent with the Protestant religion or with his
loyalty, was tried for high treason before a Scottish jury of
which the <span class="smcap">Marquis of Montrose</span> was
foreman, and was found guilty. He escaped the scaffold, for
that time, by getting away, in the disguise of a page, in the
train of his daughter, <span class="smcap">Lady Sophia
Lindsay</span>. It was absolutely proposed, by certain
members of the Scottish Council, that this lady should be whipped
through the streets of Edinburgh. But this was too much
even for the Duke, who had the manliness then (he had very little
at most times) to remark that Englishmen were not accustomed to
treat ladies in that manner. In those merry times nothing
could equal the brutal servility of the Scottish fawners, but the
conduct of similar degraded beings in England.</p>
<p>After the settlement of these little affairs, the Duke
returned to England, and soon resumed his place at the Council,
and his office of High Admiral—all this by his
brother’s favour, and in open defiance of the law. It
would have been no loss to the country, if he had been drowned
when his ship, in going to Scotland to fetch his family, struck
on a sand-bank, and was lost with two hundred souls on
board. But he escaped in a boat with some friends; and the
sailors were so brave and unselfish, that, when they saw him
rowing away, they gave three cheers, while they themselves were
going down for ever.</p>
<p>The Merry Monarch, having got rid of his Parliament, went to
work to make himself despotic, with all speed. Having had
the villainy to order the execution of <span class="smcap">Oliver
Plunket</span>, <span class="smcap">Bishop of Armagh</span>,
falsely accused of a plot to establish Popery in that country by
means of a French army—the very thing this royal traitor
was himself trying to do at home—and having tried to ruin
Lord Shaftesbury, and failed—he turned his hand to
controlling the corporations all over the country; because, if he
could only do that, he could get what juries he chose, to bring
in perjured verdicts, and could get what members he chose
returned to Parliament. These merry times produced, and
made Chief Justice of the Court of King’s Bench, a drunken
ruffian of the name of <span class="smcap">Jeffreys</span>; a
red-faced, swollen, bloated, horrible creature, with a bullying,
roaring voice, and a more savage nature perhaps than was ever
lodged in any human breast. This monster was the Merry
Monarch’s especial favourite, and he testified his
admiration of him by giving him a ring from his own finger, which
the people used to call Judge Jeffreys’s Bloodstone.
Him the King employed to go about and bully the corporations,
beginning with London; or, as Jeffreys himself elegantly called
it, ‘to give them a lick with the rough side of his
tongue.’ And he did it so thoroughly, that they soon
became the basest and most sycophantic bodies in the
kingdom—except the University of Oxford, which, in that
respect, was quite pre-eminent and unapproachable.</p>
<p>Lord Shaftesbury (who died soon after the King’s failure
against him), <span class="smcap">Lord William Russell</span>,
the Duke of Monmouth, <span class="smcap">Lord Howard</span>,
<span class="smcap">Lord Jersey</span>, <span class="smcap">Algernon Sidney</span>, <span class="smcap">John
Hampden</span> (grandson of the great Hampden), and some others,
used to hold a council together after the dissolution of the
Parliament, arranging what it might be necessary to do, if the
King carried his Popish plot to the utmost height. Lord
Shaftesbury having been much the most violent of this party,
brought two violent men into their secrets—<span class="smcap">Rumsey</span>, who had been a soldier in the
Republican army; and <span class="smcap">West</span>, a
lawyer. These two knew an old officer of <span class="smcap">Cromwell’s</span>, called <span class="smcap">Rumbold</span>, who had married a maltster’s
widow, and so had come into possession of a solitary dwelling
called the Rye House, near Hoddesdon, in Hertfordshire.
Rumbold said to them what a capital place this house of his would
be from which to shoot at the King, who often passed there going
to and fro from Newmarket. They liked the idea, and
entertained it. But, one of their body gave information;
and they, together with <span class="smcap">Shepherd</span> a
wine merchant, Lord Russell, Algernon Sidney, <span class="smcap">Lord Essex</span>, <span class="smcap">Lord
Howard</span>, and Hampden, were all arrested.</p>
<p>Lord Russell might have easily escaped, but scorned to do so,
being innocent of any wrong; Lord Essex might have easily
escaped, but scorned to do so, lest his flight should prejudice
Lord Russell. But it weighed upon his mind that he had
brought into their council, Lord Howard—who now turned a
miserable traitor—against a great dislike Lord Russell had
always had of him. He could not bear the reflection, and
destroyed himself before Lord Russell was brought to trial at the
Old Bailey.</p>
<p>He knew very well that he had nothing to hope, having always
been manful in the Protestant cause against the two false
brothers, the one on the throne, and the other standing next to
it. He had a wife, one of the noblest and best of women,
who acted as his secretary on his trial, who comforted him in his
prison, who supped with him on the night before he died, and
whose love and virtue and devotion have made her name
imperishable. Of course, he was found guilty, and was
sentenced to be beheaded in Lincoln’s Inn-fields, not many
yards from his own house. When he had parted from his
children on the evening before his death, his wife still stayed
with him until ten o’clock at night; and when their final
separation in this world was over, and he had kissed her many
times, he still sat for a long while in his prison, talking of
her goodness. Hearing the rain fall fast at that time, he
calmly said, ‘Such a rain to-morrow will spoil a great
show, which is a dull thing on a rainy day.’ At
midnight he went to bed, and slept till four; even when his
servant called him, he fell asleep again while his clothes were
being made ready. He rode to the scaffold in his own
carriage, attended by two famous clergymen, <span class="smcap">Tillotson</span> and <span class="smcap">Burnet</span>, and sang a psalm to himself very
softly, as he went along. He was as quiet and as steady as
if he had been going out for an ordinary ride. After saying
that he was surprised to see so great a crowd, he laid down his
head upon the block, as if upon the pillow of his bed, and had it
struck off at the second blow. His noble wife was busy for
him even then; for that true-hearted lady printed and widely
circulated his last words, of which he had given her a
copy. They made the blood of all the honest men in England
boil.</p>
<p>The University of Oxford distinguished itself on the very same
day by pretending to believe that the accusation against Lord
Russell was true, and by calling the King, in a written paper,
the Breath of their Nostrils and the Anointed of the Lord.
This paper the Parliament afterwards caused to be burned by the
common hangman; which I am sorry for, as I wish it had been
framed and glazed and hung up in some public place, as a monument
of baseness for the scorn of mankind.</p>
<p>Next, came the trial of Algernon Sidney, at which Jeffreys
presided, like a great crimson toad, sweltering and swelling with
rage. ‘I pray God, Mr. Sidney,’ said this Chief
Justice of a merry reign, after passing sentence, ‘to work
in you a temper fit to go to the other world, for I see you are
not fit for this.’ ‘My lord,’ said the
prisoner, composedly holding out his arm, ‘feel my pulse,
and see if I be disordered. I thank Heaven I never was in
better temper than I am now.’ Algernon Sidney was
executed on Tower Hill, on the seventh of December, one thousand
six hundred and eighty-three. He died a hero, and died, in
his own words, ‘For that good old cause in which he had
been engaged from his youth, and for which God had so often and
so wonderfully declared himself.’</p>
<p>The Duke of Monmouth had been making his uncle, the Duke of
York, very jealous, by going about the country in a royal sort of
way, playing at the people’s games, becoming godfather to
their children, and even touching for the King’s evil, or
stroking the faces of the sick to cure them—though, for the
matter of that, I should say he did them about as much good as
any crowned king could have done. His father had got him to
write a letter, confessing his having had a part in the
conspiracy, for which Lord Russell had been beheaded; but he was
ever a weak man, and as soon as he had written it, he was ashamed
of it and got it back again. For this, he was banished to
the Netherlands; but he soon returned and had an interview with
his father, unknown to his uncle. It would seem that he was
coming into the Merry Monarch’s favour again, and that the
Duke of York was sliding out of it, when Death appeared to the
merry galleries at Whitehall, and astonished the debauched lords
and gentlemen, and the shameless ladies, very considerably.</p>
<p>On Monday, the second of February, one thousand six hundred
and eighty-five, the merry pensioner and servant of the King of
France fell down in a fit of apoplexy. By the Wednesday his
case was hopeless, and on the Thursday he was told so. As
he made a difficulty about taking the sacrament from the
Protestant Bishop of Bath, the Duke of York got all who were
present away from the bed, and asked his brother, in a whisper,
if he should send for a Catholic priest? The King
replied, ‘For God’s sake, brother, do!’
The Duke smuggled in, up the back stairs, disguised in a wig and
gown, a priest named <span class="smcap">Huddleston</span>, who
had saved the King’s life after the battle of Worcester:
telling him that this worthy man in the wig had once saved his
body, and was now come to save his soul.</p>
<p>The Merry Monarch lived through that night, and died before
noon on the next day, which was Friday, the sixth. Two of
the last things he said were of a human sort, and your
remembrance will give him the full benefit of them. When
the Queen sent to say she was too unwell to attend him and to ask
his pardon, he said, ‘Alas! poor woman, <i>she</i> beg
<i>my</i> pardon! I beg hers with all my heart. Take
back that answer to her.’ And he also said, in
reference to Nell Gwyn, ‘Do not let poor Nelly
starve.’</p>
<p>He died in the fifty-fifth year of his age, and the
twenty-fifth of his reign.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />