<h4><SPAN name="X" id="X" />X</h4>
<h4>POOR RICHARD'S ALMANAC AND OTHER ACTIVITIES</h4>
<p><ANTIMG src="images/block-i.jpg" class="floatLeft" alt=
"block-I" />N 1732 I first publish'd my Almanack, under the name of
<i>Richard Saunders</i>; it was continu'd by me about twenty-five
years, commonly call'd <i>Poor Richard's Almanac</i>.<SPAN name=
"FNanchor_74" id="FNanchor_74" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_74" class=
"fnanchor">[74]</SPAN> I endeavour'd to make it both entertaining and
useful, and it accordingly came to be in such demand, that I reap'd
considerable profit from it, vending annually near ten thousand.
And observing that it was generally read, scarce any neighborhood
in the province being without it, I consider'd it as a proper
vehicle for conveying instruction among the common people, who
bought scarcely any other books; I therefore filled all the little
spaces that occurr'd between the remarkable days in the calendar
with proverbial sentences, chiefly such as inculcated industry and
frugality, as the means of procuring wealth, and thereby securing
virtue; it being more difficult for a man in want, to act always
honestly, as, to use here one of those proverbs, <i>it is hard for
an empty sack to stand upright</i>.</p>
<p>These proverbs, which contained the wisdom of many ages and
nations, I assembled and form'd into a connected discourse prefix'd
to the Almanack of 1757, as the harangue of a wise old man to the
people attending an auction. The bringing all these scatter'd
councils thus into a focus enabled them to make greater impression.
The piece, being universally approved, was copied in all the
newspapers of the Continent; reprinted in Britain on a broadside,
to be stuck up in houses; two translations were made of it in
French, and great numbers bought by the clergy and gentry, to
distribute gratis among their poor parishioners and tenants. In
Pennsylvania, as it discouraged useless expense in foreign
superfluities, some thought it had its share of influence in
producing that growing plenty of money which was observable for
several years after its publication.</p>
<div class="center_caption">Two pages from <i>Poor Richard's
Almanac</i> for 1736. Size of original. Reproduced from a copy at
the New York Public Library.<br/>
</div>
<table border="0" summary="Poor Richard's Almanac" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td class="cell_poor"><SPAN name="p171" id="p171" /> <SPAN href=
"images/209-june.jpg"><ANTIMG src="images/209-junethumb.jpg" alt=
"June page from Poor Richard's Almanac for 1736" title=
"June page from Poor Richard's Almanac for 1736" /></SPAN> </td>
<td class="cell_poor"><SPAN href="images/210-july.jpg"><ANTIMG src=
"images/210-julythumb.jpg" alt=
"July page from Poor Richard's Almanac for 1736" title=
"July page from Poor Richard's Almanac for 1736" /></SPAN> </td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>I considered my newspaper, also, as another means of
communicating instruction, and in that view frequently reprinted in
it extracts from the Spectator, and other moral writers; and
sometimes publish'd little pieces of my own, which had been first
composed for reading in our Junto. Of these are a Socratic
dialogue, tending to prove that, whatever might be his parts and
abilities, a vicious man could not properly be called a man of
sense; and a discourse on self-denial, showing that virtue was not
secure till its practice became a habitude, and was free from the
opposition of contrary inclinations. These may be found in the
papers about the beginning of 1735.<SPAN name="FNanchor_75" id=
"FNanchor_75" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_75" class=
"fnanchor">[75]</SPAN></p>
<p>In the conduct of my newspaper, I carefully excluded all
libeling and personal abuse, which is of late years become so
disgraceful to our country. Whenever I was solicited to insert
anything of that kind, and the writers pleaded, as they generally
did, the liberty of the press, and that a newspaper was like a
stage-coach, in which anyone who would pay had a right to a place,
my answer was, that I would print the piece separately if desired,
and the author might have as many copies as he pleased to
distribute himself, but that I would not take upon me to spread his
detraction; and that, having contracted with my subscribers to
furnish them with what might be either useful or entertaining, I
could not fill their papers with private altercation, in which they
had no concern, without doing them manifest injustice. Now, many of
our printers make no scruple of gratifying the malice of
individuals by false accusations of the fairest characters among
ourselves, augmenting animosity even to the producing of duels; and
are, moreover, so indiscreet as to print scurrilous reflections on
the government of neighboring states, and even on the conduct of
our best national allies, which may be attended with the most
pernicious consequences. These things I mention as a caution to
young printers, and that they may be encouraged not to pollute
their presses and disgrace their profession by such infamous
practices, but refuse steadily, as they may see by my example that
such a course of conduct will not, on the whole, be injurious to
their interests.</p>
<p>In 1733 I sent one of my journeymen to Charleston, South
Carolina, where a printer was wanting. I furnish'd him with a press
and letters, on an agreement of partnership, by which I was to
receive one-third of the profits of the business, paying one-third
of the expense. He was a man of learning, and honest but ignorant
in matters of account; and, tho' he sometimes made me remittances,
I could get no account from him, nor any satisfactory state of our
partnership while he lived. On his decease, the business was
continued by his widow, who, being born and bred in Holland, where,
as I have been inform'd, the knowledge of accounts makes a part of
female education, she not only sent me as clear a state as she
could find of the transactions past, but continued to account with
the greatest regularity and exactness every quarter afterwards, and
managed the business with such success, that she not only brought
up reputably a family of children, but, at the expiration of the
term, was able to purchase of me the printing-house, and establish
her son in it.</p>
<p>I mention this affair chiefly for the sake of recommending that
branch of education for our young females, as likely to be of more
use to them and their children, in case of widowhood, than either
music or dancing, by preserving them from losses by imposition of
crafty men, and enabling them to continue, perhaps, a profitable
mercantile house, with establish'd correspondence, till a son is
grown up fit to undertake and go on with it, to the lasting
advantage and enriching of the family.</p>
<p>About the year 1734 there arrived among us from Ireland a young
Presbyterian preacher, named Hemphill, who delivered with a good
voice, and apparently extempore, most excellent discourses, which
drew together considerable numbers of different persuasions, who
join'd in admiring them. Among the rest, I became one of his
constant hearers, his sermons pleasing me, as they had little of
the dogmatical kind, but inculcated strongly the practice of
virtue, or what in the religious stile are called good works.
Those, however, of our congregation, who considered themselves as
orthodox Presbyterians, disapprov'd his doctrine, and were join'd
by most of the old clergy, who arraign'd him of heterodoxy before
the synod, in order to have him silenc'd. I became his zealous
partisan, and contributed all I could to raise a party in his
favour, and we combated for him awhile with some hopes of success.
There was much scribbling pro and con upon the occasion; and
finding that, tho' an elegant preacher, he was but a poor writer, I
lent him my pen and wrote for him two or three pamphlets, and one
piece in the Gazette of April, 1735. Those pamphlets, as is
generally the case with controversial writings, tho' eagerly read
at the time, were soon out of vogue, and I question whether a
single copy of them now exists.<SPAN name="FNanchor_76" id=
"FNanchor_76" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_76" class=
"fnanchor">[76]</SPAN></p>
<p>During the contest an unlucky occurrence hurt his cause
exceedingly. One of our adversaries having heard him preach a
sermon that was much admired, thought he had somewhere read the
sermon before, or at least a part of it. On search, he found that
part quoted at length, in one of the British Reviews, from a
discourse of Dr. Foster's.<SPAN name="FNanchor_77" id=
"FNanchor_77" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</SPAN>
This detection gave many of our party disgust, who accordingly
abandoned his cause, and occasion'd our more speedy discomfiture in
the synod. I stuck by him, however, as I rather approv'd his giving
us good sermons composed by others, than bad ones of his own
manufacture, tho' the latter was the practice of our common
teachers. He afterward acknowledg'd to me that none of those he
preach'd were his own; adding, that his memory was such as enabled
him to retain and repeat any sermon after one reading only. On our
defeat, he left us in search elsewhere of better fortune, and I
quitted the congregation, never joining it after, tho' I continu'd
many years my subscription for the support of its ministers.</p>
<p>I had begun in 1733 to study languages; I soon made myself so
much a master of the French as to be able to read the books with
ease. I then undertook the Italian. An acquaintance, who was also
learning it, us'd often to tempt me to play chess with him. Finding
this took up too much of the time I had to spare for study, I at
length refus'd to play any more, unless on this condition, that the
victor in every game should have a right to impose a task, either
in parts of the grammar to be got by heart, or in translations,
etc., which tasks the vanquish'd was to perform upon honour, before
our next meeting. As we play'd pretty equally, we thus beat one
another into that language. I afterwards with a little painstaking,
acquir'd as much of the Spanish as to read their books also.</p>
<p>I have already mention'd that I had only one year's instruction
in a Latin school, and that when very young, after which I
neglected that language entirely. But, when I had attained an
acquaintance with the French, Italian, and Spanish, I was surpris'd
to find, on looking over a Latin Testament, that I understood so
much more of that language than I had imagined, which encouraged me
to apply myself again to the study of it, and I met with more
success, as those preceding languages had greatly smooth'd my
way.</p>
<p>From these circumstances, I have thought that there is some
inconsistency in our common mode of teaching languages. We are told
that it is proper to begin first with the Latin, and, having
acquir'd that, it will be more easy to attain those modern
languages which are deriv'd from it; and yet we do not begin with
the Greek, in order more easily to acquire the Latin. It is true
that, if you can clamber and get to the top of a staircase without
using the steps, you will more easily gain them in descending; but
certainly, if you begin with the lowest you will with more ease
ascend to the top; and I would therefore offer it to the
consideration of those who superintend the education of our youth,
whether, since many of those who begin with the Latin quit the same
after spending some years without having made any great
proficiency, and what they have learnt becomes almost useless, so
that their time has been lost, it would not have been better to
have begun with the French, proceeding to the Italian, etc.; for,
tho', after spending the same time, they should quit the study of
languages and never arrive at the Latin, they would, however, have
acquired another tongue or two, that, being in modern use, might be
serviceable to them in common life.<SPAN name="FNanchor_78" id=
"FNanchor_78" /><SPAN href="#Footnote_78" class=
"fnanchor">[78]</SPAN></p>
<p>After ten years' absence from Boston, and having become easy in
my circumstances, I made a journey thither to visit my relations,
which I could not sooner well afford. In returning, I call'd at
Newport to see my brother, then settled there with his
printing-house. Our former differences were forgotten, and our
meeting was very cordial and affectionate. He was fast declining in
his health, and requested of me that, in case of his death, which
he apprehended not far distant, I would take home his son, then but
ten years of age, and bring him up to the printing business. This I
accordingly perform'd, sending him a few years to school before I
took him into the office. His mother carried on the business till
he was grown up, when I assisted him with an assortment of new
types, those of his father being in a manner worn out. Thus it was
that I made my brother ample amends for the service I had depriv'd
him of by leaving him so early.</p>
<div class="figcenter"><ANTIMG width-obs="60%" src= "images/illus-021-red.jpg" alt= "Our former differences were forgotten, and our meeting was very cordial and affectionate" title=
"Our former differences were forgotten, and our meeting was very cordial and affectionate" /></div>
<p>In 1736 I lost one of my sons, a fine boy of four years old, by
the small-pox, taken in the common way. I long regretted bitterly,
and still regret that I had not given it to him by inoculation.
This I mention for the sake of parents who omit that operation, on
the supposition that they should never forgive themselves if a
child died under it; my example showing that the regret may be the
same either way, and that, therefore, the safer should be
chosen.</p>
<p>Our club, the Junto, was found so useful, and afforded such
satisfaction to the members, that several were desirous of
introducing their friends, which could not well be done without
exceeding what we had settled as a convenient number, viz., twelve.
We had from the beginning made it a rule to keep our institution a
secret, which was pretty well observ'd; the intention was to avoid
applications of improper persons for admittance, some of whom,
perhaps, we might find it difficult to refuse. I was one of those
who were against any addition to our number, but, instead of it,
made in writing a proposal, that every member separately should
endeavour to form a subordinate club, with the same rules
respecting queries, etc., and without informing them of the
connection with the Junto. The advantages proposed were, the
improvement of so many more young citizens by the use of our
institutions; our better acquaintance with the general sentiments
of the inhabitants on any occasion, as the Junto member might
propose what queries we should desire, and was to report to the
Junto what pass'd in his separate club; the promotion of our
particular interests in business by more extensive recommendation,
and the increase of our influence in public affairs, and our power
of doing good by spreading thro' the several clubs the sentiments
of the Junto.</p>
<p>The project was approv'd, and every member undertook to form his
club, but they did not all succeed. Five or six only were
compleated, which were called by different names, as the Vine, the
Union, the Band, etc. They were useful to themselves, and afforded
us a good deal of amusement, information, and instruction, besides
answering, in some considerable degree, our views of influencing
the public opinion on particular occasions, of which I shall give
some instances in course of time as they happened.</p>
<p>My first promotion was my being chosen, in 1736, clerk of the
General Assembly. The choice was made that year without opposition;
but the year following, when I was again propos'd (the choice, like
that of the members, being annual), a new member made a long speech
against me, in order to favour some other candidate. I was,
however, chosen, which was the more agreeable to me, as, besides
the pay for the immediate service as clerk, the place gave me a
better opportunity of keeping up an interest among the members,
which secur'd to me the business of printing the votes, laws, paper
money, and other occasional jobbs for the public, that, on the
whole, were very profitable.</p>
<p>I therefore did not like the opposition of this new member, who
was a gentleman of fortune and education, with talents that were
likely to give him, in time, great influence in the House, which,
indeed, afterwards happened. I did not, however, aim at gaining his
favour by paying any servile respect to him, but, after some time,
took this other method. Having heard that he had in his library a
certain very scarce and curious book, I wrote a note to him,
expressing my desire of perusing that book, and requesting he would
do me the favour of lending it to me for a few days. He sent it
immediately, and I return'd it in about a week with another note,
expressing strongly my sense of the favour. When we next met in the
House, he spoke to me (which he had never done before), and with
great civility; and he ever after manifested a readiness to serve
me on all occasions, so that we became great friends, and our
friendship continued to his death. This is another instance of the
truth of an old maxim I had learned, which says, <i>"He that has
once done you a kindness will be more ready to do you another, than
he whom you yourself have obliged."</i> And it shows how much more
profitable it is prudently to remove, than to resent, return, and
continue inimical proceedings.</p>
<p>In 1737, Colonel Spotswood, late governor of Virginia, and then
postmaster-general, being dissatisfied with the conduct of his
deputy at Philadelphia, respecting some negligence in rendering,
and inexactitude of his accounts, took from him the commission and
offered it to me. I accepted it readily, and found it of great
advantage; for, tho' the salary was small, it facilitated the
correspondence that improv'd my newspaper, increas'd the number
demanded, as well as the advertisements to be inserted, so that it
came to afford me a considerable income. My old competitor's
newspaper declin'd proportionately, and I was satisfy'd without
retaliating his refusal, while postmaster, to permit my papers
being carried by the riders. Thus he suffer'd greatly from his
neglect in due accounting; and I mention it as a lesson to those
young men who may be employ'd in managing affairs for others, that
they should always render accounts, and make remittances, with
great clearness and punctuality. The character of observing such a
conduct is the most powerful of all recommendations to new
employments and increase of business.</p>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_74" id="Footnote_74" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_74"><span class="label">[74]</span></SPAN> The almanac at
that time was a kind of periodical as well as a guide to natural
phenomena and the weather. Franklin took his title from <i>Poor
Robin</i>, a famous English almanac, and from Richard Saunders, a
well-known almanac publisher. For the maxims of Poor Richard, see
pages <SPAN href="#THE_WAY_TO_WEALTH">331</SPAN>-335.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_75" id="Footnote_75" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_75"><span class="label">[75]</span></SPAN> June 23 and July
7, 1730.—Smyth.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_76" id="Footnote_76" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_76"><span class="label">[76]</span></SPAN> See "A List of
Books written by, or relating to Benjamin Franklin," by Paul
Leicester Ford. 1889. p. 15.—Smyth.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_77" id="Footnote_77" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_77"><span class="label">[77]</span></SPAN> Dr. James Foster
(1697-1753):—</p>
<div class="poem2">
<div class="stanza">
<div class="i2">"Let modest Foster, if he will excel</div>
<div class="i2">Ten metropolitans in preaching well."</div>
</div></div>
<p class="three">—Pope (Epilogue to the Satires, I, 132).</p>
<p>"Those who had not heard Farinelli sing and Foster preach were
not qualified to appear in genteel company," Hawkins. "History of
Music."—Smyth.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_78" id="Footnote_78" /><SPAN href=
"#FNanchor_78"><span class="label">[78]</span></SPAN> "The authority
of Franklin, the most eminently practical man of his age, in favor
of reserving the study of the dead languages until the mind has
reached a certain maturity, is confirmed by the confession of one
of the most eminent scholars of any age.</p>
<p>"'Our seminaries of learning,' says Gibbon, 'do not exactly
correspond with the precept of a Spartan king, that the child
should be instructed in the arts which will be useful to the man;
since a finished scholar may emerge from the head of Westminster or
Eton, in total ignorance of the business and conversation of
English gentlemen in the latter end of the eighteenth century. But
these schools may assume the merit of teaching all that they
pretend to teach, the Latin and Greek
languages.'"—Bigelow.</p>
</div>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />