<h3>DIALOGUE XXIX.</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus</span>—<span class="smcap">Caius
Julius Cæsar</span>.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—Alas, Cæsar! how unhappily did you end
a life made illustrious by the greatest exploits in war and most various
civil talents!</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—Can Scipio wonder at the ingratitude of
Rome to her generals? Did not he reproach her with it in the epitaph
he ordered to be inscribed upon his tomb at Liternum, that mean village
in Campania, to which she had driven the conqueror of Hannibal and of
Carthage? I also, after subduing her most dangerous enemies, the
Helvetians, the Gauls, and the Germans, after raising her name to the
highest pitch of glory, should have been deprived of my province, reduced
to live as a private man under the power of my enemies and the enviers
of my greatness; nay, brought to a trial and condemned by the judgment
of a <!-- page 170--><SPAN name="page170"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>faction,
if I had not led my victorious troops to Rome, and by their assistance,
after all my offers of peace had been iniquitously rejected, made myself
master of a State which knew so ill how to recompense superior merit.
Resentment of this, together with the secret machinations of envy, produced
not long afterwards a conspiracy of senators, and even of some whom
I had most obliged and loved, against my life, which they basely took
away by assassination.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—You say you led your victorious troops to Rome.
How were they your troops? I thought the Roman armies had belonged
to the Republic, not to their generals.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—They did so in your time. But before
I came to command them, Marius and Sylla had taught them that they belonged
to their generals. And I taught the senate that a veteran army,
affectionately attached to its leader, could give him all the treasures
and honours of the State without asking their leave.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—Just gods! did I then deliver my country from
the invading Carthaginian, did I exalt it by my victories above all
other nations, that it might become a richer prey to its own rebel soldiers
and their ambitious commanders?</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—How could it be otherwise? Was it
possible that the conquerors of Europe, Asia, and Africa could tamely
submit to descend from their triumphal chariots and become subject to
the authority of prætors and consuls elected by a populace corrupted
by bribes, or enslaved to a confederacy of factious nobles, who, without
regard to merit, considered all the offices and dignities of the State
as hereditary possessions belonging to their families?</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—If I thought it no dishonour, after triumphing
over Hannibal, to lay down my fasces and obey, as all my ancestors had
done before me, the magistrates of the republic, such a conduct would
not have dishonoured either Marius, or Sylla, or Cæsar.
But you all dishonoured yourselves when, instead of virtuous Romans,
superior to your <!-- page 171--><SPAN name="page171"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>fellow-citizens
in merit and glory, but equal to them in a due subjection to the laws,
you became the enemies, the invaders, and the tyrants of your country.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—Was I the enemy of my country in giving
it a ruler fit to support all the majesty and weight of its empire?
Did I invade it when I marched to deliver the people from the usurped
dominion and insolence of a few senators? Was I a tyrant because
I would not crouch under Pompey, and let him be thought my superior
when I felt he was not my equal?</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—Pompey had given you a noble example of moderation
in twice dismissing the armies, at the head of which he had performed
such illustrious actions, and returning a private citizen into the bosom
of his country.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—His moderation was a cheat. He believed
that the authority his victories had gained him would make him effectually
master of the commonwealth without the help of those armies. But
finding it difficult to subdue the united opposition of Crassus and
me, he leagued himself with us, and in consequence of that league we
three governed the empire. But, after the death of Crassus, my
glorious achievements in subduing the Gauls raised such a jealousy in
him that he could no longer endure me as a partner in his power, nor
could I submit to degrade myself into his subject.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—Am I then to understand that the civil war you
engaged in was really a mere contest whether you or Pompey should remain
sole lord of Rome?</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—Not so, for I offered, in my letters to
the senate, to lay down my arms if Pompey at the same time would lay
down his, and leave the republic in freedom. Nor did I resolve
to draw the sword till not only the senate, overpowered by the fear
of Pompey and his troops, had rejected these offers, but two tribunes
of the people, for legally and justly interposing their authority in
my behalf, had been forced to fly from Rome disguised in the habit of
slaves, <!-- page 172--><SPAN name="page172"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>and
take refuge in my camp for the safety of their persons. My camp
was therefore the asylum of persecuted liberty, and my army fought to
avenge the violation of the rights and majesty of the people as much
as to defend the dignity of their general unjustly oppressed.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—You would therefore have me think that you contended
for the equality and liberty of the Romans against the tyranny of Pompey
and his lawless adherents. In such a war I, myself, if I had lived
in your times, would have willingly been your lieutenant. Tell
me then, on the issue of this honourable enterprise, when you had subdued
all your foes and had no opposition remaining to obstruct your intentions,
did you establish that liberty for which you fought? Did you restore
the republic to what it was in my time?</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—I took the necessary measures to secure
to myself the fruits of my victories, and gave a head to the empire,
which could neither subsist without one nor find another so well suited
to the greatness of the body.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—There the true character of Cæsar was
seen unmasked. You had managed so skilfully in the measures which
preceded the civil war, your offers were so specious, and there appeared
so much violence in the conduct of your enemies that, if you had fallen
in that war, posterity might have doubted whether you were not a victim
to the interests of your country. But your success, and the despotism
you afterwards exorcised, took off those disguises and showed clearly
that the aim of all your actions was tyranny.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—Let us not deceive ourselves with sounds
and names. That great minds should aspire to sovereign power is
a fixed law of Nature. It is an injury to mankind if the highest
abilities are not placed in the highest stations. Had you, Scipio,
been kept down by the republican jealousy of Cato, the censor Hannibal
would have never been recalled out of Italy nor defeated in Africa.
And if I had <!-- page 173--><SPAN name="page173"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>not
been treacherously murdered by the daggers of Brutus and Cassius, my
sword would have avenged the defeat of Crassus and added the empire
of Parthia to that of Rome. Nor was my government tyrannical.
It was mild, humane, and bounteous. The world would have been
happy under it and wished its continuance, but my death broke the pillars
of the public tranquillity and brought upon the whole empire a direful
scene of calamity and confusion.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—You say that great minds will naturally aspire
to sovereign power. But, if they are good as well as great, they
will regulate their ambition by the laws of their country. The
laws of Rome permitted me to aspire to the conduct of the war against
Carthage; but they did not permit you to turn her arms against herself,
and subject her to your will. The breach of one law of liberty
is a greater evil to a nation than the loss of a province; and, in my
opinion, the conquest of the whole world would not be enough to compensate
for the total loss of their freedom.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—You talk finely, Africanus; but ask yourself,
whether the height and dignity of your mind—that noble pride which
accompanies the magnanimity of a hero—could always stoop to a
nice conformity with the laws of your country? Is there a law
of liberty more essential, more sacred, than that which obliges every
member of a free community to submit himself to a trial, upon a legal
charge brought against him for a public misdemeanour? In what
manner did you answer a regular accusation from a tribune of the people,
who charged you with embezzling the money of the State? You told
your judges that on that day you had vanquished Hannibal and Carthage,
and bade them follow you to the temples to give thanks to the gods.
Nor could you ever be brought to stand a legal trial, or justify those
accounts, which you had torn in the senate when they were questioned
there by two magistrates in the name of the Roman people. Was
this acting like the subject of a free State? Had your victory
procured you an exemption <!-- page 174--><SPAN name="page174"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>from
justice? Had it given into your hands the money of the republic
without account? If it had, you were king of Rome. Pharsalia,
Thapsus, and Munda could do no more for me.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—I did not question the right of bringing me
to a trial, but I disdained to plead in vindication of a character so
unspotted as mine. My whole life had been an answer to that infamous
charge.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—It may be so; and, for my part, I admire
the magnanimity of your behaviour. But I should condemn it as
repugnant and destructive to liberty, if I did not pay more respect
to the dignity of a great general, than to the forms of a democracy
or the rights of a tribune.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—You are endeavouring to confound my cause with
yours; but they are exceedingly different. You apprehended a sentence
of condemnation against you for some part of your conduct, and, to prevent
it, made an impious war on your country, and reduced her to servitude.
I trusted the justification of my affronted innocence to the opinion
of my judges, scorning to plead for myself against a charge unsupported
by any other proof than bare suspicions and surmises. But I made
no resistance; I kindled no civil war; I left Rome undisturbed in the
enjoyment of her liberty. Had the malice of my accusers been ever
so violent, had it threatened my destruction, I should have chosen much
rather to turn my sword against my own bosom than against that of my
country.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—You beg the question in supposing that
I really hurt my country by giving her a master. When Cato advised
the senate to make Pompey sole consul, he did it upon this principle,
that any kind of government is preferable to anarchy. The truth
of this, I presume, no man of sense will contest; and the anarchy, which
that zealous defender of liberty so much apprehended, would have continued
in Rome, if that power, which the urgent necessity of the State conferred
upon me, had not removed it.</p>
<p><!-- page 175--><SPAN name="page175"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span><i>Scipio</i>.—Pompey
and you had brought that anarchy on the State in order to serve your
own ends. It was owing to the corruption, the factions, and the
violence which you had encouraged from an opinion that the senate would
be forced to submit to an absolute power in your hands, as a remedy
against those intolerable evils. But Cato judged well in thinking
it eligible to make Pompey sole consul rather than you dictator, because
experience had shown that Pompey respected the forms of the Roman constitution;
and though he sought, by bad means as well as good, to obtain the highest
magistracies and the most honourable commands, yet he laid them down
again, and contented himself with remaining superior in credit to any
other citizen.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—If all the difference between my ambition
and Pompey’s was only, as you represent it, in a greater or less
respect for the forms of the constitution, I think it was hardly becoming
such a patriot as Cato to take part in our quarrel, much less to kill
himself rather than yield to my power.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—It is easier to revive the spirit of liberty
in a government where the forms of it remain unchanged, than where they
have been totally disregarded and abolished. But I readily own
that the balance of the Roman constitution had been destroyed by the
excessive and illegal authority which the people were induced to confer
upon Pompey, before any extraordinary honours or commands had been demanded
by you. And that is, I think, your best excuse.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—Yes, surely. The favourers of the
Manilian law had an ill grace in desiring to limit the commissions I
obtained from the people, according to the rigour of certain absolute
republican laws, no more regarded in my time than the Sybilline oracles
or the pious institutions of Numa.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—It was the misfortune of your time that they
were not regarded. A virtuous man would not take from <!-- page 176--><SPAN name="page176"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>a
deluded people such favours as they ought not to bestow. I have
a right to say this because I chid the Roman people, when, overheated
by gratitude for the services I had done them, they desired to make
me perpetual consul and dictator. Hear this, and blush.
What I refused to accept, you snatched by force.</p>
<p><i>Cæsar</i>.—Tiberius Gracchus reproached you with the
inconsistency of your conduct, when, after refusing these offers, you
so little respected the tribunitian authority. But thus it must
happen. We are naturally fond of the idea of liberty till we come
to suffer by it, or find it an impediment to some predominant passion;
and then we wish to control it, as you did most despotically, by refusing
to submit to the justice of the State.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—I have answered before to that charge.
Tiberius Gracchus himself, though my personal enemy, thought it became
him to stop the proceedings against me, not for my sake, but for the
honour of my country, whose dignity suffered with mine. Nevertheless
I acknowledge my conduct in that business was not absolutely blameless.
The generous pride of virtue was too strong in my mind. It made
me forget I was creating a dangerous precedent in declining to plead
to a legal accusation brought against me by a magistrate invested with
the majesty of the whole Roman people. It made me unjustly accuse
my country of ingratitude when she had shown herself grateful, even
beyond the true bounds of policy and justice, by not inflicting upon
me any penalty for so irregular a proceeding. But, at the same
time, what a proof did I give of moderation and respect for her liberty,
when my utmost resentment could impel me to nothing more violent than
a voluntary retreat and quiet banishment of myself from the city of
Rome! Scipio Africanus offended, and living a private man in a
country-house at Liternum, was an example of more use to secure the
equality of the Roman commonwealth than all the power of its tribunes.</p>
<p><!-- page 177--><SPAN name="page177"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span><i>Cæsar</i>.—I
had rather have been thrown down the Tarpeian Rock than have retired,
as you did, to the obscurity of a village, after acting the first part
on the greatest theatre of the world.</p>
<p><i>Scipio</i>.—A usurper exalted on the highest throne of the
universe is not so glorious as I was in that obscure retirement.
I hear, indeed, that you, Cæsar, have been deified by the flattery
of some of your successors. But the impartial judgment of history
has consecrated my name, and ranks me in the first class of heroes and
patriots; whereas, the highest praise her records, even under the dominion
usurped by your family, have given to you, is, that your courage and
talents were equal to the object your ambition aspired to, the empire
of the world; and that you exercised a sovereignty unjustly acquired
with a magnanimous clemency. But it would have been better for
your country, and better for mankind, if you had never existed.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />