<h2>ADDRESSES</h2>
<p>Not free from some ignominious attendance upon the opinion of the
world is he who too consciously withdraws his affairs from its judgements.
He is indebted to “the public.” He is at least indebted
to it for the fact that there is, yonder, without, a public. Lacking
this excluded multitude his fastidiousness would have no subject, and
his singularity no contrast. He would, in his grosser moods, have
nothing to refuse, and nothing, in his finer, to ignore.</p>
<p>He, at any rate, is one, and the rest are numerous. They minister
to him popular errors. But if they are nothing else in regard
to himself, they are many. If he must have distinction, it is
there on easy terms—he is one.</p>
<p>Well for him if he does not contract the heavier debt shouldered
by the man who owes to the unknown, un-named, and uncounted his pleasure
in their conjectured or implicit envy; who conceives the jealousy they
may have covertly to endure, enjoys it, and thus silently begins and
ends within his own morosity the story of his base advantage.</p>
<p>Vanity has indignity as its underside. And how shall even the
pleasure in beauty be altogether without it? For since beauty,
like other human things, is comparative, how shall the praise, or the
admiration, thereof be free from (at least) some reference to the unbeautiful?
Or from some allusion to the less beautiful? Yet this, if inevitable,
is little; it may be negligible. The triumph of beauty is all
but innocent. It is where no beauty is in question that lurks
the unconfessed appeal to envy. That appeal is not an appeal to
admiration—it lacks what is the genial part of egoism. For
who, except perhaps a recent writer of articles on society in America,
really admires a man for living in the approved part of Boston?</p>
<p>The vanity of addresses is as frequent with us as on the western
side of the Atlantic. It is a vanity without that single apology
for vanity—gaiety of heart. The first things that are, in
London, sacrificed to it are the beautiful day and the facing of the
sky. There are some amongst us whose wives have constrained them
to dwell underground for love of an address. Modern and foolish
is that contempt for daylight. To the simple, day is beautiful;
and “beautiful as day” a happy proverb.</p>
<p>Over all colour, flesh, aspect, surface, manifestation of vitality,
dwells one certain dominance. And if One, vigilant for the dues
of His vicegerent, should ask us whose is the image and superscription?
We reply, The Sun’s.</p>
<p>The London air shortens and clips those beams, and yet leaves daylight
the finest thing we know. Beauty of artificial lights is in our
streets at night, but their chief beauty is when, just before night,
they adorn the day. The late daylight honours them when it so
easily and sweetly subdues and overcomes them, giving to the electric
lamp, to the taper, to the hearth fire, and to the spark, a loveliness
not their own.</p>
<p>With the unpublished desire to be envied, whereto here and there
amongst us is sacrificed the sky, abides the desire for an object of
unconfessed contempt. Both are contrary to that more authentic,
that essential solitariness wherein a few men have the grace to live,
and wherein all men are compelled to die. Both are unpublished
even now, even in our days, when it costs men so little to manifest
the effrontery of their opinions.</p>
<p>The difference between our worldliness and the New-worldliness is
chiefly that here we are apt to remove, by a little space, the distinction
brought about by riches, to put it back, to interpose, between it and
our actual life, a generation or two, an education or two. Obviously,
it was riches that made the class differences, if not now, then a little
time ago. Therefore the New England citizen should not be reproved
by us for anything except his too great candour. A social guide-book
to some city of the Republic is in my hands. I note how the very
names of streets take a sound of veneration or of cheerful derision
from the writer’s pen. It is evident that the names are
almost enough. They have an expression. He is like a <i>naïf</i>
teller of humorous anecdotes, who cannot keep his own smiles in order
till he have done.</p>
<p>This social writer has scorn, as an author should, and he wreaks
it upon parishes. He turns me a phrase with the northern end of
a town and makes an epigram of the southern. He caps a sarcasm
with an address.</p>
<p>In truth, we too might write social guide-books to the same effect,
had we the same simplicity. It is to be thought that we too hold
an address, be it a good one, so closely that if Fortune should see
fit to snatch it from us, she must needs do so with violence.
Such unseemly violence, in this as in other transactions, is ours in
the clinging and not hers in the taking. For equal is the force
of Fortune, and steady is her grasp, whether she despoil the great of
their noble things or strip the mean of things ignoble, whether she
take from the clutching or the yielding hand.</p>
<p>Strange are the little traps laid by the Londoner so as to capture
an address by the hem if he may. You would think a good address
to be of all blessings the most stationary, and one to be either gained
or missed, and no two ways about it. But not so. You shall
see it waylaid at the angles of squares, with no slight exercise of
skill, delayed, entreated, detained, entangled, intricately caught,
persuaded to round a corner, prolonged beyond all probability, pursued.</p>
<p>One address there will in the future be for us, and few will visit
there. It will bear the number of a narrow house. May it
avow its poverty and be poor; for the obscure inhabitant, in frigid
humility, shall have no thought nor no eye askance upon the multitude.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />