<h3><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XIII" id="CHAPTER_XIII"></SPAN>CHAPTER XIII<br/><br/> EXPERIENCE, INVESTIGATION, AND PROGRESS</h3>
<div class="blockquot"><p class="hang">The Red Sea Line—Government Inquiry—Electrical Standards and
Units—Further Cables—Improvements in Manufacture, Testing, and
Working—Completion of Pioneer Stage.</p>
</div>
<p><i>The Red Sea Line.</i>—Mr. Lionel Gisborne had obtained powers from the
Turkish Government to carry a telegraph-line across Egypt and lay a
cable down the Red Sea. The importance of this line to Great Britain led
the Government to give definite assistance.</p>
<p>The first portion of the proposed cable—from Suez to Aden, with
intermediate landings—was laid in 1859. The different sections broke
down one by one. They were all laid very taut, the slack in some cases
being less than one per cent, though the bottom was in certain parts
very uneven. The second portion of the line, from Aden to Kurrachee,
with intermediate stations, was laid during 1860, the slack working out
at 0.1 per cent only. Faults developed very quickly in all the sections
of both portions of the line. Apart from the small allowance for slack,
the type of cable<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_170" id="page_170"></SPAN>{170}</span> adopted was of far too fragile a nature for some of
its rough, reef-like resting-spots; indeed, the undertaking was spoken
of as “like running a donkey for the Leger”! The promoters of this
enterprise, having neither specially qualified men nor the necessary
materials for carrying out repairs, were obliged to abandon it before
any commercial work had been effected. This was a most unfortunate line
in every way, for a complete message was never got through the entire
length, but only through each section separately. Nevertheless, until
quite recently, it cost Great Britain £36,000 per annum.</p>
<p><i>Inquiry on the Construction of Submarine Telegraphs.</i>—Aroused more
especially by the above failure, the Government, in 1859, before
undertaking further responsibility, resolved to thoroughly investigate
the construction of cables. It was also felt that the ultimate failure
of the Atlantic line was possibly due, in part, to weak joints and
general defects in the manufacture of the insulating envelope. This
committee—under the direction of the Board of Trade, with Captain,
afterward Sir Douglas, Galton, R.E., in the chair—devoted twenty-two
sittings (covering a considerable period of time) to questioning
engineers, electricians, professors, physicists, manufacturers, and
seamen, who had taken part in the various branches of cable-work and
whose knowledge or experience might throw light on the subject.
Investigations were instituted concerning the structure of all cables
previously made, and the quality of the different materials used, as to
special points arising during manufacture and laying, on the routes
taken, electrical testing, and<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_171" id="page_171"></SPAN>{171}</span> on sending and receiving instruments,
speed of signaling, etc. Actual experiments were also made in connection
with this inquiry, to ascertain (1) the electrical and mechanical
qualities of copper, pure and alloyed; also of gutta-percha and other
insulating substances; (2) the chemical change in their condition when
submerged; (3) the effects of temperature and pressure on the insulating
substances employed; (4) the elongation and breaking strain of copper
wires; of iron, steel, and tarred hemp separately and combined; (5) the
phenomena connected with electrically charging and discharging
conductors; (6) methods of testing conductors and of locating faults;
besides the whole science and practise of cable-making and laying.</p>
<p>The report of the committee was not published till some time afterward.
It expressed a conviction that submarine telegraphy might be made sure
and remunerative in the future, based on the evidence adduced regarding
the proper manufacture and working of submarine telegraphs.</p>
<p><i>Formulation of Electrical Standards and Units.</i>—This inquiry was
shortly followed by an important paper before the British Association
for the advancement of science by Sir Charles Bright and Mr. Latimer
Clark (then in partnership), which put the practise of electrical
testing on a systematic basis, thereby considerably forwarding all
electrical work connected with submarine telegraphy. A committee was
formed shortly afterward, which gave the suggestions then brought
forward the seal of universal officialdom.</p>
<p><i>Further Cables.</i>—About this time a number of other cable enterprises
were set afoot, some in<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_172" id="page_172"></SPAN>{172}</span> shallow water and others in comparatively great
depths. Though few of them were able to benefit by the information
obtained in the inquiry, they were, in the main, more or less
successful. These projects included cables between Malta and Alexandria,
besides others in the Mediterranean and elsewhere. Sir Charles Bright,
Mr. (afterward Sir C. W.) Siemens, Mr. Lionel Gisborne, and Mr. H. C.
Forde were mainly associated with them as engineers and electricians.
The line which met, however, with the most complete and lasting success
was the first cable to India, laid (by Sir Charles Bright) in several
sections along the Persian Gulf in 1863-’64. In this undertaking Messrs.
Bright & Clark (engineers to the Government) introduced a complete
system of electrical and mechanical testing. Every joint was, for the
first time, efficiently tested, and the insulated core submitted to a
hydraulic pressure representative of that which it would experience when
laid.<SPAN name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_55_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</SPAN> A formula was also arrived at by an elaborate series of
experiments for the effect of temperature on the insulation, which
showed how enormously the resistance of gutta-percha increased by
consolidation when submitted to the low temperatures of the bottom of
the ocean. Chatterton’s compound had been already introduced for
adhering the gutta-percha envelope to the wires, as well as for
cementing together the different insulating coats; but Bright & Clark’s
preservative composition for the iron armor was first used in this
enterprise. This mixture not<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_173" id="page_173"></SPAN>{173}</span> only evades the oxidation that iron wires,
even when galvanized, are subject to, but resists the attacks of the
teredo and other objectionable animal life. Moreover, besides the type
of cable being eminently suitable, the manufacture was carried out with
extreme care and with all the advantage of experience and improved
methods.<SPAN name="FNanchor_56_56" id="FNanchor_56_56"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_56_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</SPAN></p>
<p><i>Completion of Pioneer Stage.</i>—With the successful termination of the
above enterprise, forming the first telegraphic connection between the
United Kingdom, Europe, and India, the science of constructing and
laying submarine telegraphs was pretty definitely worked out, and no
very striking departure has since been introduced. The pioneer stage
may, indeed, at this juncture, be said to have reached completion.</p>
<p>For this reason the rest of our narrative on the Atlantic cable will be
told more briefly—though at greater length than the contents of this
chapter, recounting only the stepping-stones to what was to follow.<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_174" id="page_174"></SPAN>{174}</span><SPAN name="page_175" id="page_175"></SPAN></p>
<h2><SPAN name="PART_IV" id="PART_IV"></SPAN>PART IV<br/><br/> COMMERCIAL SUCCESS</h2>
<p><span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_176" id="page_176"></SPAN>{176}</span><SPAN name="page_177" id="page_177"></SPAN></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />