<h2>CHAPTER XI<br/> SCANDINAVIAN INFLUENCE IN ENGLAND</h2>
<p>Of the districts occupied by Scandinavian settlers
in England the ones which show their presence most
strongly are Cumberland, Westmorland, North Lancashire
and Yorkshire in the old kingdom of Northumbria
and the district of the Five Boroughs in the
midlands. East Anglia was not so deeply affected
by the Danish occupation.</p>
<p>Before dealing with one of the chief sources of
our knowledge of the presence of Norse and Danish
settlers in various parts of England, viz. the evidence
derived from place-nomenclature, a few words must
be said as to the chief Scandinavian elements which
can be recognised in English place-names.</p>
<p>Of elements other than personal names the
commonest are as follows, several of them being
used as independent words to this day in English
dialects which have been affected by Scandinavian
influence:—</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">BECK.</span> O.N. <i>bekkr</i>, brook, small stream of
water.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[124]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">BIGGIN(G).</span> O.N. <i>bygging</i>, building.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">BY.</span> O.N. <i>bør</i>, Dan. Swed. <i>by</i>, town or village.
This word indicates a Danish rather than a Norse
settlement.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">CAR(R)</span>, -ker. O.N. <i>kjarr</i>, <i>kjörr</i>, brushwood,
especially on swampy ground.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">DALE.</span> O.N. <i>dalr</i>, valley. Etymologically this
word might be of native English origin but its
distribution points to Norse influence.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">FELL.</span> O.N. <i>fjall</i>, mountain.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">FORCE.</span> O.N. <i>fors</i>, waterfall.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">FORTH.</span> O.N. <i>fjǫrðr</i>, fjord. English -ford and
Scandinavian -forth often interchange in the old
documents.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">GARTH.</span> O.N. <i>garðr</i>, enclosure, the Scandinavian
equivalent of English 'yard.'</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">GILL.</span> O.N. <i>gil</i>, deep narrow glen with a stream
at the bottom.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">HOLM.</span> O.N. <i>holmr</i>, small island especially in a
bay, creek, or river. In England its meaning was
further developed and it often means 'low-lying level
ground on the borders of a river or stream.' Now
often concealed in the suffix -ham.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">KELD.</span> O.N. <i>kelda</i>, well, spring.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">LUND</span>, -lound. O.N. <i>lundr</i>, grove. Now often
corrupted to -land in English place-names.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">MIRE.</span> O.N. <i>myrr</i>, moor, bog, swamp.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">RAISE.</span> O.N. <i>hreysi</i>, cairn.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[125]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">SCALE.</span> O.N. <i>skali</i>, house. This word is Norse
rather than Danish.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">SCAR</span>, -skear, -skerry. O.N. <i>sker</i>, isolated rock in
the sea.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">SCOUT.</span> O.N. <i>skúti</i>, cave formed by jutting rocks.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">SCOUGH</span>, -scow. O.N. <i>skógr</i>, wood.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">SLACK.</span> O.N. <i>slakki</i>, slope on a mountain edge.
Often used in English place-names of a hollow or
boggy place<SPAN name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</SPAN>.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">TARN.</span> O.N. <i>tjörn</i>, small lake.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">THORP(E).</span> O.N. <i>þorp</i>, hamlet, village. This
word is also found in O.E. and in some place-names
is undoubtedly of native origin, but its general
distribution points fairly conclusively to Norse
influence.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">THWAITE.</span> O.N. <i>þveit</i>, parcel of land, paddock.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">TOFT.</span> O.N. <i>topt</i>, piece of ground, messuage,
homestead.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">WITH.</span> O.N. <i>viðr</i>, a wood.</p>
<p>-<span class="smcap">WATH.</span> O.N. <i>vað</i>, a ford.</p>
<p>Place-names with the prefix <i>Norman</i>- mark the
settlement not of Normans but of Norsemen (or
Northmen as the English called them), as in Normanton
and Normanby, while the settlement of
Danes is marked by the prefix <i>Dena</i>- or <i>Den</i>- as in
Denaby and Denby. This latter prefix however has
other sources as well.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[126]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>Scandinavian personal names are very common in
place-names but their presence can as a rule only be
detected with any degree of certainty by reference
to the forms found in early documents. Among the
more easily recognised are <i>Grímr</i>, as in Grimsargh
(Lancs.) and Grimsby (Lincs.), <i>Gunnarr</i>, as in Gunnerside
(Yorks.), <i>Ketill</i>, as in Kettlewell (Yorks.),
<i>Klakkr</i>, as in Claxton (Norf.), <i>Ormr</i>, as in Ormskirk
(Lancs.). Others, to be found by reference to earlier
forms, are <i>Fráni</i>, as in Franesfeld (=Farnsfield,
Notts.), <i>Gamall</i>, as in Gamelestune (=Gamston,
Notts.), <i>Gunnúlfr</i>, as in Gunnulveston (=Gonalston,
Notts.), <i>Knútr</i>, as in Cnutestone (=Knuston,
Northants.), <i>Leifr</i>, as in Levesbi (=Laceby, Lincs.),
<i>Sumarliði</i>, as in Sumarlidebi (=Somerby, Lincs.),
<i>Skúli</i>, as in Sculetuna (=Scoulton, Norf.), <i>Tóli</i>, as
in Toleslund (=Toseland, Hunts.), <i>Víkingr</i>, as in
Wichingestone (=Wigston, Leic.), <i>Úlfr</i>, as in Ulvesbi
(=Ulceby, Lincs.).</p>
<p>Examining the distribution of Scandinavian place-names
determined by the above tests and others
which can be applied with great accuracy, if we
study not the modern but the old forms of the place-names,
we find that the place-nomenclature of
Cumberland and Westmorland is almost entirely
either Scandinavian or Celtic. Indeed it would
seem that the Anglian settlement had hardly affected
these districts at all, and it was reserved for the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[127]</SPAN></span>
Scandinavian settlers to Teutonise them. The same
is true of Furness and Lancashire, north of the
Ribble, whose old names Stercaland and Agmundernesse
are of Norse origin, but south of that river
there is a great diminution of Norse place-names
except along the coast and a little way inland, where
we have several -<i>bys</i> and -<i>dales</i>. In Cheshire the
evidence of Scandinavian settlement is confined
almost entirely to the Wirral, but there the large
number of -<i>bys</i> and place-names like Thingwall
(<i>v. supra</i>, p. <SPAN href="#Page_115">115</SPAN>, note 1) point to a strong Viking
colony, and the distribution of place-names in South
Lancashire and Cheshire bears witness to active intercourse
between the settlers in Ireland and England.</p>
<p>On the other side of the Pennine chain, though
Northumberland was several times ravaged by the
Norsemen and was probably well populated at least
in the fertile river-valleys, there is practically no
evidence of their presence to be found in place-names.
There are several Biggins, Carrs, and Holms,
a few Tofts and Dales, but these are common dialect
words and usually found in uncompounded forms.
They are practically never found in names of towns
or villages, and may well have been introduced from
districts further south. In the extreme west and
south-west of the county there are 'fells' and 'dales'
but these are on the borders of Cumberland, Westmorland
and Durham. The small streams are<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[128]</SPAN></span>
'burns' and not 'becks,' the Wansbeck being a
corruption of an earlier <i>Wanespike</i>.</p>
<p>When we cross into co. Durham the tributaries of
the Wear vary between 'burn' and 'beck,' but by
the time we reach the Tees these have all become
becks. Beechburn Beck, a tributary of the Wear,
shows how a Scandinavian term could be attached to
an English name, when its own meaning was neglected
or forgotten. Other Scandinavian names are common,
but as in Northumberland they belong to the dialect
generally and are seldom found in names of towns
or villages. Viking settlers must have been few in
numbers and widely scattered throughout these two
counties. One great exception must be named
among the towns, viz. Durham itself. The city was
named <i>Dún-holmr</i>, 'the hill-island,' by the Vikings,
and its present name is only the Norman corruption
of that form.</p>
<p>South of the Tees we find ourselves in a district
whose place-names are to a very large extent
Scandinavian, and Norse settlements are thickly and
evenly distributed from the North Sea to the Pennine
chain.</p>
<p>Passing from Northumbria to the Danelagh,
Lincolnshire is perhaps more purely Scandinavian in
its place-names than any other English county. In
Derbyshire Viking influence is not so strong but
the county was probably very thinly inhabited at least<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[129]</SPAN></span>
in the north and west and did not offer attractive
settling ground. Derby itself was rechristened by
the Northmen, its earlier name being 'Norðweorðig.'
The rich fields and pastures of Leicestershire attracted
a great many settlers and Nottinghamshire is also
strongly Scandinavian. Rutland and Northamptonshire
are strongly Danish except that there is some
shading off towards the S.W. corner of the latter
county. In the country bordering the Danelagh on
the south and west, Staffordshire has a few Scandinavian
place-names on its Derbyshire and Leicestershire
borders, while Warwickshire has several on its
Leicestershire and Northamptonshire borders.</p>
<p>In East Anglia Danish settlements must have
been numerous in the north and east especially
towards the coast, but their presence is less strongly
marked in the S.W. portion of the county. In
Suffolk they are confined still more definitely to the
coast-districts and the Danes do not seem to have
settled in the south of the county at all. Three
Kirbys near the Essex coast mark settlements in that
county. Of the other border-counties Huntingdonshire,
Cambridgeshire and Bedfordshire show only
the slightest traces of Scandinavian influence in their
place-nomenclature, though we know from other
evidence that there must have been many Danish
settlers in these counties.</p>
<p>Closely allied to the evidence of place-names is<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[130]</SPAN></span>
that of dialect. A very large number of words
definitely of Scandinavian origin are found in the
dialects of N.E. and N.W. England, in the N. Midlands
and East Anglia, but they do not furnish so sensitive
a test as do place-names for the extent of the
Scandinavian settlements and they need not be discussed
here.</p>
<p>More interesting as evidence of the deep influence
of the Viking settlers on our language is the large
number of Scandinavian loan-words which have
become part of our standard speech, many of them
being words essential to our every-day talk. To
Scandinavian influence we owe the pronouns <i>they</i>,
<i>them</i> and <i>their</i>, the adjectives <i>same</i> and <i>both</i>, the <i>fro</i>
in <i>to</i> and <i>fro</i> and possibly the auxiliary <i>are</i> and
the preposition <i>till</i>. These last are found in the
Northumbrian dialect of Old English but their
widespread use is probably due to Scandinavian
influence. In addition to these we may note the
following:</p>
<p>Verbs: <i>bait</i>, <i>bask</i>, <i>batten</i>, <i>call</i>, <i>cast</i>, <i>dawn</i>, <i>droop</i>,
<i>drown</i>, <i>gain</i>, <i>gabble</i>, <i>ransack</i>, <i>scare</i>, <i>scour</i>, <i>scrape</i>,
<i>skim</i>, <i>skip</i>, <i>squeal</i>, <i>stint</i>, <i>take</i>,</p>
<p>Nouns: <i>anger</i>, <i>billow</i>, <i>boon</i>, <i>dusk</i>, <i>fellow</i>, <i>gait</i>,
<i>grime</i>, <i>haven</i>, <i>husband</i>, <i>husk</i>, <i>husting</i>, <i>scull</i>, <i>scurf</i>,
<i>skill</i>, <i>skin</i>, <i>skirt</i>, <i>sky</i>, <i>window</i>,</p>
<p>Adjectives: <i>awkward</i>, <i>ill</i>, <i>odd</i>, <i>rotten</i>, <i>scant</i>, <i>sly</i>,
<i>ugly</i>, <i>weak</i>,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[131]</SPAN></span>
and a good many words in which Scandinavian forms
have replaced the cognate English ones, e.g. <i>aloft</i>,
<i>athwart</i>, <i>awe</i>, <i>birth</i>, <i>egg</i>, <i>get</i>, <i>gift</i>, <i>give</i>, <i>guest</i>, <i>raid</i>,
<i>sister</i>, <i>swain</i>, <i>Thursday</i>.</p>
<p>These words are for the most part of the very
stuff and substance of our language, giving vivid
expression to clear-cut ideas, and though numerically
they are outnumbered by the loan-words from
French, they are in themselves more essential to our
speech than the rich vocabulary derived from that
language.</p>
<p>For the extent and character of the Viking
settlements in England we have however a far more
delicate and accurate index than that to be found in
the evidence of place-names and dialects. When we
study the pages of Domesday, the great record of
English social organisation in the 11th century, we
find that in the counties which came under Viking
influence there are many details of land-division,
tenure, assessment and social organisation generally
wherein those counties differ from the rest of England,
and some of these differences can still be traced.</p>
<p>The 'ridings' of Yorkshire and the Lindsey division
of Lincolnshire were originally 'thrithings' (O.N.
<i>þriþjungr</i>, a third part), the initial <i>th</i> being later
absorbed by the final consonant of the preceding
'East,' 'West,' 'North' and 'South' (in Lincs.).</p>
<p>The chief tests of Scandinavian influence, drawn<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[132]</SPAN></span>
from Domesday and allied sources, are however as
follows:</p>
<p>(1) The use of the Danish 'wapentake' as the
chief division of the county in contrast to the English
'hundred.' This is found in Lincolnshire, Derbyshire
(with one exception on its southern border), Nottinghamshire,
Leicestershire, Rutland, and one district
of Northamptonshire, now included in Rutland. We
have wapentakes in Yorkshire, except in certain
districts along the sea-coast, while in Lancashire
the term was applied to the court of the hundred or
shire long after the Conquest. There is some evidence
also for the belief that the use of the hundred (or
wapentake) as an administrative unit is in itself due
to Scandinavian influence. The proportion of names
of hundreds (or wapentakes) which are definitely
of Danish origin is very high and, unless we assume
wholesale renaming, this points to their having been
first named at a period subsequent to the Danish
conquest.</p>
<p>(2) The assessment by carucates in multiples
and submultiples of 12 is characteristic of the Danelagh,
as opposed to that by hides, arranged on a
decimal system in the strictly English districts. This
is found in Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire,
Leicestershire and Rutland, with the exception of
the above mentioned district. There are traces of a
duodecimal assessment in the two N.E. hundreds of<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[133]</SPAN></span>
Northamptonshire, while in Lancashire a hidal assessment
has been superimposed upon an original carucal
one. Carucal assessment is found also in Yorkshire,
Norfolk and Suffolk.</p>
<p>(3) In Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire
and Yorkshire we have traces of the use of the Danish
'long' hundred (= 120), e.g. the fine for breaking the
king's peace is £8, i.e. 120 ores<SPAN name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</SPAN> of 16 pence.</p>
<p>Using the various tests we find that the Scandinavian
kingdom of Northumbria was considerably
smaller than the earlier realm of that name, Northumberland
and Durham being but sparsely settled,
while South Lancashire and Cheshire were occupied
chiefly along the coast. The kingdom would seem to
fall into two isolated halves, Cumberland and Westmorland
and North Lancashire in the north-west
and Yorkshire in the south-east. The district of the
Five Boroughs covered Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire,
Lincolnshire (Lincoln and Stamford), Leicestershire,
and probably the whole of Rutland (Stamford). The
case of Northamptonshire is difficult. The carucal
assessment fails except in the extreme N.E. of the
county, but Danish place-nomenclature is strongly
evident, though it shades off somewhat towards the
S.W. It resembles Danish East Anglia rather than
the district of the Five Boroughs and it is possible
that the boundary of Guthrum's East Anglian kingdom,
which is only carried as far as Stony Stratford in
the peace of Alfred and Guthrum, really ran along
Watling Street for a few miles, giving two-thirds of
that county to the East Anglian realm.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[134]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>Northumbria was governed by a succession of
kings. The Five Boroughs formed a loose confederation,
and there can be no question that the districts
which 'obeyed' (<i>v. supra</i>, p. <SPAN href="#Page_31">31</SPAN>) the boroughs of Derby,
Leicester, Nottingham, Lincoln (and Stamford) and
Northampton form the modern counties named from
these towns. It is also to Danish influence direct or
indirect that we owe the similar organisation of the
counties of Huntingdonshire, Cambridgeshire, Bedfordshire
and Hertfordshire in the old East Anglian
kingdom. Each of these counties had a <i>jarl</i> or earl,
whose headquarters were at the 'borough.' He summoned
the <i>here</i>, whether for political or military
purposes, and when these counties passed once more
under English rule he fulfilled the functions of the
older <i>ealdorman</i>.</p>
<p>In East Anglia, apart from place-names (<i>v. supra</i>,
p. <SPAN href="#Page_129">129</SPAN>) and carucal assessment in Norfolk and Suffolk,
we are left with the boundaries of Guthrum's kingdom
and with various miscellaneous evidence for estimating
the extent of Scandinavian influence. There is a
curious 'hundredus Dacorum' (cf. <i>supra</i>, p. 10) in<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[135]</SPAN></span>
Hertfordshire, while the <i>Historia Eliensis</i> and other
documents tend to show the presence of a strong
Danish element in the population and social organisation
of the districts around Cambridge. The kingship
of East Anglia came to an end early in the 10th
century, and it is probable that its organisation was
then changed to one resembling that of the Five
Boroughs, viz. a number of districts grouped around
central 'boroughs,' which afterwards became counties,
except in the older divisions of Norfolk and Suffolk.</p>
<p>A careful study of Domesday and other authorities
reveals many other features of interest in our social
system which were due to Viking influence. Certain
types of manorial structure are specially common
in the Danelagh. Manor and vill are by no means
identical, indeed several manors are included under
one vill. Very frequent is the type which consists
in a central manor with sokeland appurtenant. In
the Danelagh there was a large number of small
freeholders and the free peasant class was much
more numerous than in Anglo-Saxon England. These
districts stand in clear contrast to the strongly
manorialised southern counties and they were not
feudalised to any appreciable extent before the
Norman conquest. When that system was imposed
we often find single knight's fees having to be taken
over by entire communities of sokemen. The 'holds'
of Northumbria, who rank next after the earls,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[136]</SPAN></span>
and the 'drengs' of Cumberland, Westmorland,
Lancashire, Northumberland and Durham, are also
of Scandinavian origin. The 'dreng' was 'a free
servant of the king endowed with lands' and the
name still survives in the Yorkshire place-name
Dringhouses.</p>
<p>The legal instinct was strong in the Scandinavian
mind and English law bears deep marks of its influence.
The very word 'law' itself is of Scandinavian origin
and has replaced the English 'doom.' The chief
judicial authority in Lincoln, Stamford, Cambridge,
Chester and York was in the hands of twelve
<i>lagmen</i> or <i>judices</i>. These 'lawmen' (<i>v. supra</i>, p. <SPAN href="#Page_103">103</SPAN>)
though they had judicial authority were not chosen
by the king or by popular election. Their position
was hereditary. Of special interest are the '12 senior
thanes' of Aethelred's laws for the Five Boroughs
enacted at Wantage in 997. They have to come
forward in the court of every wapentake and to
swear that they will not accuse wrongly any innocent
man or conceal any guilty one. The exact force of
this enactment has been a matter of dispute—whether
the thanes simply bore witness to the personal status
of the accused, thus enabling the court to determine
the ordeal through which he should be put, or whether
we have an anticipation of the system of presentment
by jury. Whatever may be the exact truth there
can be little doubt, says Dr Vinogradoff, that<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[137]</SPAN></span>
such a custom prepared the way for the indictment
jury of the 12th century. The same author attributes
to Danish influence a new conception of
crime. It is no longer merely a breach of the peace
or the result of a feud, to be settled by monetary
compensation, it is a breach of that conception of
honour which binds together military societies. The
criminal is now branded as <i>nithing</i>, a man unworthy
of comradeship with his fellow-warriors.</p>
<p>Unfortunately it is only within the last few years
that the question of Danish influence on our social,
political and legal systems has been treated at all
seriously and much work still remains to be done, but
we can already see that the Danes affected English
life far more deeply than a superficial glance might
suggest. Doubtless the Danish invasions struck a
heavy blow at learning and literature, a blow from
the effects of which not even the heroic activities of
an Alfred could save them, but there can be no
question that in the development of town life, in the
promotion of trade, in the improvement of organisation
and administration, in the modification of legal
procedure the invaders conferred great benefits on
the country as a whole.</p>
<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></SPAN> In Scotland it is used of a hollow pass in a ridge.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></SPAN> The <i>ore</i> as a unit of weight for silver is of Scandinavian origin.
In some districts it was of the value of 16 pence, in others of 20 pence,
and eight <i>ores</i> went to the <i>mark</i>.</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr class="chap" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[138]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />