<h2>CHAPTER XXXIII<br/> <small>CHURCH AND PARISH</small></h2>
<p class="drop-cap">THEORETICALLY, the church is a pure democracy,
a mighty family. There, if anywhere,
the rich and the poor meet together on terms
of absolute equality.</p>
<p>In that least poetical of pious jingles,—</p>
<p class="center">
“Blest be the tie that binds,”—<br/></p>
<p class="unindent">we declare that</p>
<div class="poetry-container">
<div class="poetry">
<div class="verse">“The fellowship of kindred minds</div>
<div class="verse"><span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Is like to that above.”</span></div>
</div></div>
<p>These and other Pietistic platitudes, whether
tame or tuneful, are technical, and so nearly meaningless
as not to provoke debate. Every reasonable
man and woman knows and does not affect to conceal
his or her consciousness of the truth that social
distinctions are not effaced by the enrolment of rich
and poor, educated and illiterate, refined and boorish,
in impartial order upon the “church books.”<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_330" id="Page_330">[330]</SPAN></span>
True religion <i>does</i> refine feeling and engender benevolence
and charitable judgment of our fellows.
In doing this, it creates a common ground of sympathy,
as of belief. It elevates the moral and spiritual
nature. Of itself, it does not enrich the intellect,
or polish manners. One may have a clean heart
and dirty flesh-and-blood hands; may be a sincere
and earnest Christian, yet double his negatives,
shove his food into his mouth with his knife, prefer
the corner of a table-cloth to a napkin, and be an
alien in the matter of finger-bowls.</p>
<p>It is possible that two women may work together
harmoniously in church and parish associations, each
esteeming the other’s excellent qualities of heart and
enjoying the fellowship of her “kindred mind,” and
yet that both should be intensely uncomfortable if
forced into reciprocal social relations that have nothing
to do with church or charity.</p>
<div class="sidenote">THE REASONABLE VIEW</div>
<p>These are plain facts no reasonable person will
dispute. In view of them the fact, equally patent,
that the Newlyrich clan sometimes resort to church
connection as a lever to raise them to a higher social
plane, is one of the anomalies of human intercourse
that may well stir the satirist to bitter ridicule and
move compassionate beholders to wonder.</p>
<p>“When they begin to feel their oats they go off
to you!” laughed the keen-witted, sweet-natured
pastor of a down-town church to a brother clergyman<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_331" id="Page_331">[331]</SPAN></span>
whose flock worshiped in a finer building and
a fashionable neighborhood. “The sheep with the
golden fleece always finds a breach in our church-wall.”</p>
<p>It takes him, his ewe and his lambs, a long time
to learn that pew proximity does not bring about
social sympathy. It is not a week since I saw a girl,
a thoroughbred from crown to toe, flush in surprise
and draw herself up in unconscious hauteur, when
a flashily-dressed young person greeted her across
the vestibule of a concert-room with “Hello, Nellie!
didn’t we have a bully time last night?”</p>
<p>They had attended a Sunday-school anniversary,
and, as their classes were side by side, had exchanged
remarks in the intervals of recitations, songs and
addresses. The parvenu’s clothes were more costly
than “Nellie’s;” her father was richer; <i>they were
members of the same church!</i> To her vulgar mind
these circumstances gave her the right to take a
liberty with a slight acquaintance such as no well-bred
person would have dreamed of assuming.</p>
<hr class="tb" />
<div class="sidenote">YOUR PEW NEIGHBOR</div>
<p>First, then, I place among the maxims of church
and parish etiquette: Do not imagine that your next-pew
neighbor must be your friend. If she be a
newcomer and a stranger in the congregation, bow
to her in meeting in lobby or in aisle cordially,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_332" id="Page_332">[332]</SPAN></span>
recognizing her as a fellow worshiper in a temple
where all are welcome and equal. If you can be
of service to her in finding the place of hymn or
psalm, should she be at a loss, perform the neighborly
service tactfully and graciously,—always because
you are in the House of the All-Father, and are
His children,—not that you seek to court a mortal’s
favor for any ulterior purpose.</p>
<p>In meeting her on the street, let your salutation
be ready and pleasant, but not familiar. Don’t
“Hello, Nellie!” her, then or ever, while bearing
in mind that non-recognition of one you know to
be a regular attendant at the same church with yourself,
yet a comparative stranger there, is unkind and
un-Christian.</p>
<hr class="tb" />
<div class="sidenote">THE STRANGER IN CHURCH</div>
<p>The case is different if you are the stranger.
Friendly advances should come from the other side.
If they are not made, there is nothing for you to
do but to content yourself with the recollection that
you go to church to worship God, not to make acquaintances.
Never depend on your church-connection
for society. If you find congenial associates
there, rejoice in the happy circumstance and make
the most of it. If you do not, do not rail at the
congregation as “stiff and stuck up,” at the church
as a hollow sham, and the pastor as an unfaithful<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_333" id="Page_333">[333]</SPAN></span>
shepherd. The expectation on the part of some people
that he should neglect the weightier matters of
the law and the gospel, and prostitute his holy office
by becoming a social pudding-stick for incorporating
into “a jolly crowd” the divers elements of those
to whom he is called to minister, disgraces humanity
and civilization—not to say Christianity.</p>
<hr class="tb" />
<div class="sidenote">PEW HOSPITALITY</div>
<p>Pew hospitality has fallen into disuse to a great
extent of late years, principally on account of the
usher-service. The tendency of this partial desuetude
is to make pew owners utterly careless of their
obligation to entertain strangers. Regard for the
best interests of your particular church-organization
should suggest to you as a duty that you notify
the usher in your aisle of your willingness to receive
strangers into your pews whenever the one or two
vacant seats there may be needed. If your family
fills them all every Sunday, you can not exercise the
grace of hospitality.</p>
<p>When one or two, or three, are to be absent from
either service, however, take the trouble to apprise
the oft-sorely-perplexed official of the fact, and give
him leave to bring to your door any one he has to
seat. When the stranger appears, let him see at
once that you esteem his coming a pleasure. Give
him a good seat, a book and a welcome generally.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_334" id="Page_334">[334]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>By this behavior you commend to his favor your
church, human nature and the cause dearest to your
heart.</p>
<p>If you are the visiting worshiper, and it is evident
that the other occupants of the pew are the
owners thereof, make courteous and grateful acknowledgment
at the close of the service, of the hospitality
you have received. I hope the return you
get will not be the cold supercilious stare one true
gentlewoman had from the holder of a pew in the
middle aisle of a fashionable church in New York.
The guest put into Mrs. Haut Ton’s pew thanked
the latter simply and gracefully for the opportunity
given her of hearing an admirable sermon.</p>
<p>“Who are you that dare address <i>me!</i>” said the
silent stare. “It is bad enough to have <i>my</i> pew invaded
by an unvouched-for stranger without being
subjected to the impertinence of speech!”</p>
<p>The last place upon God’s earth where incivility
and the arrogance of self-conceit are admissible is
His house. “Be pitiful,” writes the apostle who
learned his code of manners from One who has been
not irreverently called “the truest gentleman who
ever lived.” “Be pitiful; be courteous!”</p>
<hr class="tb" />
<div class="sidenote">THE PASTOR’S FAMILY</div>
<div class="sidenote">THE PASTOR’S CALL</div>
<p>The relations of parishioner and the pastor’s
family are often strained hard by the popular misconception
of the social obligations existing—or<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_335" id="Page_335">[335]</SPAN></span>
that should exist—between them. In no “call” that
I ever heard of is the clergyman enjoined to cater
to the whims and vanities of exacting members by
visits that are not demanded by spiritual or temporal
needs, and which minister to nothing but the
aforesaid jealous vanity. Send for a clergyman
when his priestly offices are required. For the rest
of his precious time let him come as he likes, and
go whither he considers his duty calls him. He
was a man before he took orders, and the man has
social rights. Let him “neighbor,” as old-fashioned
folk used to say, with his kind.</p>
<p>The aforesaid “call” makes no mention of his
family. If you like to call on them when they come
to the parish, and if you find them congenial—your
congeners, in fact—keep up the association as you
would with your doctor’s, or your lawyer’s family.
That you belong to Doctor Barnabas’ parish, that
you are the wife or daughter of an officer in his
church, gives you absolutely no claim on his wife or
daughters beyond what you, individually, possess.
To demand that Mrs. Barnabas, refined in every
instinct, highly educated and with tastes for what
is best and highest in social companionship, should
be bullied and patronized by Mrs. Million, a purse-proud
vulgarian, unlearned and stupid, is sheer barbarity.
Yet we see it—and worse—in many American
churches.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_336" id="Page_336">[336]</SPAN></span></p>
<div class="sidenote">A FALSE ASSUMPTION</div>
<p>Do you, sensible and amenable reader, lead the
way to better things; loosen at least one buckle of
the harness that bows many a fine spirit to breaking,
and makes the church a smoke in the nostrils
of unprejudiced outsiders. Separate ecclesiastical
from social relations. Owe your right to call a
fellow parishioner “friend,” and to visit at manse
or parsonage, or rectory, to what you <i>are</i>—not to
the adventitious circumstance of being a member in
good standing in a fashionable, or an unfashionable,
church. Exact no consideration from those
who belong with you to the household of faith on
the ground of that spiritual “fellowship.” The position
is false; the claim ignoble.</p>
<hr class="tb" />
<p>No matter what church one is in, one should
always try to conform as far as possible to its order
of worship. Not to do this shows a want of proper
reverence.</p>
<hr class="chap" /></div>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_337" id="Page_337">[337]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />