<p><SPAN name="i_iv_10" id="i_iv_10"></SPAN>10. <i>The “Wood,” or “Mountain” Buffalo.</i>—Having myself never seen a
specimen of the so called “mountain buffalo” or “wood buffalo,” which
some writers accord the rank of a distinct variety, I can only quote the
descriptions of others. While most Rocky Mountain hunters consider the
bison of the mountains quite distinct from that of the plains, it must
be remarked that no two authorities quite agree in regard to the
distinguishing characters of the variety they recognize. Colonel Dodge
states that “His body is lighter, whilst his legs are shorter, but much
thicker and stronger, than the plains animal, thus enabling him to
perform feats of climbing and tumbling almost incredible in such a huge
and unwieldy beast.”<SPAN name="fnanchor_32_32" id="fnanchor_32_32"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</SPAN></p>
<p>The belief in the existence of a distinct mountain variety is quite
common amongst hunters and frontiersmen all along the eastern slope the
Rocky Mountains as far north as the Peace River. In this connection the
following from Professor Henry Youle Hind<SPAN name="fnanchor_33_33" id="fnanchor_33_33"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</SPAN> is of general interest:</p>
<p>“The existence of two kinds of buffalo is firmly believed by many
hunters at Red River; they are stated to be the prairie buffalo and the
buffalo of the woods. Many old hunters with whom I have conversed on
this subject aver that the so-called wood buffalo is a distinct species,
and although they are not able to offer scientific proofs, yet the
difference in size, color, hair, and horns, are enumerated as the
evidence upon which they base their statement. Men from their youth
familiar with these animals in the great plains, and the varieties which
are frequently met with in large herds, still cling to this opinion. The
buffalo of the plains are not always of the dark and rich bright brown
which forms their characteristic color. They are sometimes seen from
white to almost black, and a gray buffalo is not at all uncommon.
Buffalo <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_408"></SPAN></span>emasculated by wolves are often found on the prairies, where
they grow to an immense size; the skin of the buffalo ox is recognized
by the shortness of the wool and by its large dimensions. The skin of
the so-called wood buffalo is much larger than that of the common
animal, the hair is very short, mane or hair about the neck short and
soft, and altogether destitute of curl, which is the common feature in
the hair or wool of the prairie animal. Two skins of the so-called wood
buffalo, which I saw at Selkirk Settlement, bore a very close
resemblance to the skin of the Lithuanian bison, judging from the
specimens of that species which I have since had an opportunity of
seeing in the British Museum.</p>
<p>“The wood buffalo is stated to be very scarce, and only found north of
the Saskatchewan and on the flanks of the Rocky Mountains. It never
ventures into the open plains. The prairie buffalo, on the contrary,
generally avoids the woods in summer and keeps to the open country; but
in winter they are frequently found in the woods of the Little Souris,
Saskatchewan, the Touchwood Hills, and the aspen groves on the
Qu’Appelle. There is no doubt that formerly the prairie buffalo ranged
through open woods almost as much as he now does through the prairies.”</p>
<p>Mr. Harrison S. Young, an officer of the Hudson’s Bay Fur Company,
stationed at Fort Edmonton, writes me as follows in a letter dated
October 22, 1887: “In our district of Athabasca, along the Salt River,
there are still a few wood buffalo killed every year; but they are fast
diminishing in numbers, and are also becoming very shy.”</p>
<p>In Prof. John Macoun’s “Manitoba and the Great Northwest,” page 342,
there occurs the following reference to the wood buffalo: “In the winter
of 1870 the last buffalo were killed north of Peace River; but in 1875
about one thousand head were still in existence between the Athabasca
and Peace Rivers, north of Little Slave Lake. These are called wood
buffalo by the hunters, but diner only in size from those of the plain.”</p>
<p>In the absence of facts based on personal observations, I may be
permitted to advance an opinion in regard to the wood buffalo. There is
some reason for the belief that certain changes of form may have taken
place in the buffaloes that have taken up a permanent residence in
rugged and precipitous mountain regions. Indeed, it is hardly possible
to understand how such a radical change in the habitat of an animal
could fail, through successive generations, to effect certain changes in
the animal itself. It seems to me that the changes which would take
place in a band of plains buffaloes transferred to a permanent mountain
habitat can be forecast with a marked degree of certainty. The changes
that take place under such conditions in cattle, swine, and goats are
well known, and similar causes would certainly produce similar results
in the buffalo.</p>
<p>The scantier feed of the mountains, and the great waste of vital energy
called for in procuring it, would hardly produce a larger buffalo <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_409"></SPAN></span>than
the plains-fed animal, who acquires an abundance of daily food of the
best quality with but little effort.</p>
<p>We should expect to see the mountain buffalo smaller in body than the
plains animal, with better leg development, and particularly with
stronger hind quarters. The pelvis of the plains buffalo is surprisingly
small and weak for so large an animal. Beyond question, constant
mountain climbing is bound to develop a maximum of useful muscle and
bone and a minimum of useless fat. If the loss of mane sustained by the
African lions who live in bushy localities may be taken as an index, we
should expect the bison of the mountains, especially the “wood buffalo,”
to lose a great deal of his shaggy frontlet and mane on the bushes and
trees which surrounded him. Therefore, we would naturally expect to find
the hair on those parts shorter and in far less perfect condition than
on the bison of the treeless prairies. By reason of the more shaded
condition of his home, and the decided mitigation of the sun’s
fierceness, we should also expect to see his entire pelage of a darker
tone. That he would acquire a degree of agility and strength unknown in
his relative of the plain is reasonably certain. In the course of many
centuries the change in his form might become well defined, constant,
and conspicuous; but at present there is apparently not the slightest
ground for considering that the “mountain buffalo” or “wood buffalo” is
entitled to rank even as a variety of <i>Bison americanus</i>.</p>
<p>Colonel Dodge has recorded some very interesting information in regard
to the “mountain, or wood buffalo,” which deserves to be quoted
entire.<SPAN name="fnanchor_34_34" id="fnanchor_34_34"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</SPAN></p>
<p>“In various portions of the Rocky Mountains, especially in the region of
the parks, is found an animal which old mountaineers call the ‘bison.’
This animal bears about the same relation to a plains buffalo as a
sturdy mountain pony does to an American horse. His body is lighter,
whilst his legs are shorter, but much thicker and stronger, than the
plains animal, thus enabling him to perform feats of climbing and
tumbling almost incredible in such a huge and apparently unwieldy beast.</p>
<p>“These animals are by no means plentiful, and are moreover excessively
shy, inhabiting the deepest, darkest defiles, or the craggy, almost
precipitous, sides of mountains inaccessible to any but the most
practiced mountaineers.</p>
<p>“From the tops of the mountains which rim the parks the rains of ages
have cut deep gorges, which plunge with brusque abruptness, but
nevertheless with great regularity, hundreds or even thousands of feet
to the valley below. Down the bottom of each such gorge a clear, cold
stream of purest water, fertilizing a narrow belt of a few feet of
alluvial, and giving birth and growth, to a dense jungle of spruce,
quaking asp, and other mountain trees. One side of the gorge is
generally a <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_410"></SPAN></span>thick forest of pine, while the other side is a meadow-like
park, covered with splendid grass. Such gorges are the favorite haunt of
the mountain buffalo. Early in the morning he enjoys a bountiful
breakfast of the rich nutritious grasses, quenches his thirst with the
finest water, and, retiring just within the line of jungle, where,
himself unseen, he can scan the open, he crouches himself in the long
grass and reposes in comfort and security until appetite calls him to
his dinner late in the evening. Unlike their plains relative, there is
no stupid staring at an intruder. At the first symptom of danger they
disappear like magic in the thicket, and never stop until far removed
from even the apprehension of pursuit. I have many times come upon their
fresh tracks, upon the beds from which they had first sprung in alarm,
but I have never even seen one.</p>
<p>“I have wasted much time and a great deal of wind in vain endeavors to
add one of these animals to my bag. My figure is no longer adapted to
mountain climbing, and the possession of a bison’s head of my own
killing is one of my blighted hopes.</p>
<p>“Several of my friends have been more fortunate, but I know of no
sportsman who has bagged more than one.<SPAN name="fnanchor_35_35" id="fnanchor_35_35"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</SPAN></p>
<p>“Old mountaineers and trappers have given me wonderful accounts of the
number of these animals in all the mountain region ‘many years ago;’ and
I have been informed by them, that their present rarity is due to the
great snow-storm of 1844-’45, of which I have already spoken as
destroying the plains buffalo in the Laramie country.</p>
<p>“One of my friends, a most ardent and pertinacious sportsman, determined
on the possession of a bison’s head, and, hiring a guide, plunged into
the mountain wilds which separate the Middle from South Park. After
several days fresh tracks were discovered. Turning their horses loose on
a little gorge park, such as described, they started on foot on the
trail; for all that day they toiled and scrambled with the utmost
caution—now up, now down, through deep and narrow gorges and pine
thickets, over bare and rocky crags, sleeping where night overtook them.
Betimes next morning they pushed on the trail, and about 11 o’clock,
when both were exhausted and well-nigh disheartened, their route was
intercepted by a precipice. Looking over, they descried, on a projecting
ledge several hundred feet below, a herd of about 20 bisons lying down.
The ledge was about 300 feet at widest, by probably 1,000 feet long. Its
inner boundary was the wall of rock on the top of which they stood; its
outer appeared to be a sheer precipice of at least 200 feet. This ledge
was connected with the slope of the mountain by a narrow neck. The wind
being right, the hunters succeeded in reaching this neck unobserved. My
friend selected a magnificent head, that of a <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_411"></SPAN></span>fine bull, young but full
grown, and both fired. At the report the bisons all ran to the far end
of the ledge and plunged over.</p>
<p>“Terribly disappointed, the hunters ran to the spot, and found that they
had gone down a declivity, not actually a precipice, but so steep that
the hunters could not follow them.</p>
<p>“At the foot lay a bison. A long, a fatiguing detour brought them to the
spot, and in the animal lying dead before him my friend recognized his
bull—his first and last mountain buffalo. Hone but a true sportsman can
appreciate his feelings.</p>
<p>“The remainder of the herd was never seen after the great plunge, down
which it is doubtful if even a dog could have followed unharmed.”</p>
<p>In the issue of Forest and Stream of June 14, 1888, Dr. R. W. Shufeldt,
in an article entitled “The American Buffalo,” relates a very
interesting experience with buffaloes which were pronounced to be of the
“mountain” variety, and his observations on the animals are well worth
reproducing here. The animals (eight in number) were encountered on the
northern slope of the Big Horn Mountains, in the autumn of 1877. “We
came upon them during a fearful blizzard of heavy hail, during which our
animals could scarcely retain their feet. In fact, the packer’s mule
absolutely lay down on the ground rather than risk being blown down the
mountain side, and my own horse, totally unable to face such a violent
blow and the pelting hail (the stones being as large as big marbles),
positively stood stock-still, facing an old buffalo bull that was not
more than 25 feet in front of me. * * * Strange to say, this fearful
gust did not last more than ten minutes, when it stopped as suddenly as
it had commenced, and I deliberately killed my old buffalo at one shot,
just where he stood, and, separating two other bulls from the rest,
charged them down a rugged ravine. They passed over this and into
another one, but with less precipitous sides and no trees in the way,
and when I was on top of the intervening ridge I noticed that the
largest bull had halted in the bottom. Checking my horse, an excellent
buffalo hunter, I fired down at him without dismounting. The ball merely
barked his shoulder, and to my infinite surprise he turned and charged
me up the hill. * * * Stepping to one side of my horse, with the
charging and infuriated bull not 10 feet to my front, I fired upon him,
and the heavy ball took him square in the chest, bringing him to his
knees, with a gush of scarlet blood from his mouth and nostrils. * * *</p>
<p>“Upon examining the specimen, I found it to be an old bull, apparently
smaller and very much blacker than the ones I had seen killed on the
plains only a day or so before. Then I examined the first one I had
shot, as well as others which were killed by the packer from the same
bunch, and I came to the conclusion that they were typical
representatives of the variety known as the ‘mountain buffalo,’ a form
much more active in movement, of slighter limbs, blacker, and far more
dangerous to attack. My opinion in the premises remains unaltered
to-day. In <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_412"></SPAN></span>all this I may be mistaken, but it was also the opinion held
by the old buffalo hunter who accompanied me, and who at once remarked
when he saw them that they were ‘mountain buffalo,’ and not the plains
variety. * * *</p>
<p>“These specimens were not actually measured by me in either case, and
their being considered smaller only rested upon my judging them by my
eye. But they were of a softer pelage, black, lighter in limb, and when
discovered were in the timber, on the side of the Big Horn Mountains.”</p>
<p>The band of bison in the Yellowstone Park must, of necessity, be of the
so-called “wood” or “mountain” variety, and if by any chance one of its
members ever dies of old age, it is to be hoped its skin may be
carefully preserved and sent to the National Museum to throw some
further light on this question.</p>
<p><SPAN name="i_iv_11" id="i_iv_11"></SPAN>11. <i>The shedding of the winter pelage.</i>—In personal appearance the
buffalo is subject to striking, and even painful, variations, and the
estimate an observer forms of him is very apt to depend upon the time of
the year at which the observation is made. Toward the end of the winter
the whole coat has become faded and bleached by the action of the sun,
wind, snow, and rain, until the freshness of its late autumn colors has
totally disappeared. The bison takes on a seedy, weathered, and rusty
look. But this is not a circumstance to what happens to him a little
later. Promptly with the coming of the spring, if not even in the last
week of February, the buffalo begins the shedding of his winter coat. It
is a long and difficult task, and with commendable energy he sets about
it at the earliest possible moment. It lasts him more than half the
year, and is attended with many positive discomforts.</p>
<p>The process of shedding is accomplished in two ways: by the new hair
growing into and forcing off the old, and by the old hair falling off in
great patches, leaving the skin bare. On the heavily-haired
portions—the head, neck, fore quarters, and hump—the old hair stops
growing, dies, and the new hair immediately starts through the skin and
forces it off. The new hair grows so rapidly, and at the same time so
densely, that it forces itself into the old, becomes hopelessly
entangled with it, and in time actually lifts the old hair clear of the
skin. On the head the new hair is dark brown or black, but on the neck,
fore quarters, and hump it has at first, and indeed until it is 2 inches
in length, a peculiar gray or drab color, mixed with brown, totally
different from its final and natural color. The new hair starts first on
the head, but the actual shedding of the old hair is to be seen first
along the lower parts of the neck and between the fore legs. The
heavily-haired parts are never bare, but, on the contrary, the amount of
hair upon them is about the same all the year round. The old and the new
hair cling together with provoking tenacity long after the old coat
should fall, and on several of the bulls we killed in October there were
patches of it <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_413"></SPAN></span>still sticking tightly to the shoulders, from which it
had to be forcibly plucked away. Under all such patches the new hair was
of a different color from that around them.</p>
<p>The other process of shedding takes place on the body and hind quarters,
from which the old hair loosens and drops off in great woolly flakes a
foot square, more or less. The shedding takes place very unevenly, the
old hair remaining much longer in some places than in others. During
April, May, and June the body and hind quarters present a most ludicrous
and even pitiful spectacle. The island-like patches of persistent old
hair alternating with patches of bare brown skin are adorned (?) by
great ragged streamers of loose hair, which flutter in the wind like
signals of distress. Whoever sees a bison at this period is filled with
a desire to assist nature by plucking off the flying streamers of old
hair; but the bison never permits anything of the kind, however good
one’s intentions may be. All efforts to dislodge the old hair are
resisted to the last extremity, and the buffalo generally acts as if the
intention were to deprive him of his skin itself. By the end of June, if
not before, the body and hind quarters are free from the old hair, and
as bare as the hide of a hippopotamus. The naked skin has a shiny brown
appearance, and of course the external anatomy of the animal is very
distinctly revealed. But for the long hair on the fore quarters, neck,
and head the bison would lose all his dignity of appearance with his
hair. As it is, the handsome black head, which is black with new hair as
early as the first of May, redeems the animal from utter homeliness.</p>
<p>After the shedding of the body hair, the naked skin of the buffalo is
burned by the sun and bitten by flies until he is compelled to seek a
pool of water, or even a bed of soft mud, in which to roll and make
himself comfortable. He wallows, not so much because he is so fond of
either water or mud, but in self-defense; and when he emerges from his
wallow, plastered with mud from head to tail, his degradation is
complete. He is then simply not fit to be seen, even by his best
friends.</p>
<p>By the first of October, a complete and wonderful transformation has
taken place. The buffalo stands forth clothed in a complete new suit of
hair, fine, clean, sleek, and bright in color, not a speck of dirt nor a
lock awry anywhere. To be sure, it is as yet a trifle short on the body,
where it is not over an inch in length, and hardly that; but it is
growing rapidly and getting ready for winter.</p>
<p>From the 20th of November to the 20th of December the pelage is at its
very finest. By the former date it has attained its full growth, its
colors are at their brightest, and nothing has been lost either by the
elements or by accidental causes. To him who sees an adult bull at this
period, or near it, the grandeur of the animal is irresistibly felt.
After seeing buffaloes of all ages in the spring and summer months the
contrast afforded by those seen in October, November, and December was
most striking and impressive. In the later period, as different
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_414"></SPAN></span>individuals were wounded and brought to bay at close quarters, their
hair was so clean and well-kept, that more than once I was led to
exclaim: “He looks as if he had just been combed.”</p>
<p>It must be remarked, however, that the long hair of the head and fore
quarters is disposed in locks or tufts, and to comb it in reality would
utterly destroy its natural and characteristic appearance.</p>
<p>Inasmuch as the pelage of the domesticated bison, the only
representatives of the species which will be found alive ten years
hence, will in all likelihood develop differently from that of the wild
animal, it may some time in the future be of interest to know the
length, by careful measurement, of the hair found on carefully-selected
typical wild specimens. To this end the following measurements are
given. It must be borne in mind that these specimens were not chosen
because their pelage was particularly luxuriant, but rather because they
are fine average specimens.</p>
<p>The hair of the adult bull is by no means as long as I have seen on a
bison, although perhaps not many have greatly surpassed it. It is with
the lower animals as with man—the length of the hairy covering is an
individual character only. I have in my possession a tuft of hair, from
the frontlet of a rather small bull bison, which measures 22½ inches
in length. The beard on the specimen from which this came was
correspondingly long, and the entire pelage was of wonderful length and
density.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h4>LENGTH OF THE HAIR OF BISON AMERICANUS.</h4>
<h5>[Measurements, in inches, of the pelage of the specimens composing the
group in the National Museum.]</h5>
<div class="center">
<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0" summary="length of hair">
<tr><td align="center"> </td><td align="center">Old bull,<br/>killed<br/>Dec. 6.</td><td align="center">Old cow,<br/>killed<br/>Nov. 18.</td><td align="center">Spike bull,<br/>killed<br/>Oct. 14.</td><td align="center">Young cow,<br/>killed<br/>Oct. 14.</td><td align="center">Yearling calf,<br/>killed<br/>Oct. 31.</td><td align="center">Young calf,<br/>four<br/>months old.</td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of hair on the shoulder (over scapula)</td><td align="center"><tt> 3¾</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 4¾</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 3½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 3¼</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 3 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 1½</tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of hair on top of hump</td><td align="center"><tt> 6½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 7 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 5¼</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 5½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 4½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 2 </tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of hair on the middle of the side</td><td align="center"><tt> 2 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 1½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 2½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 1½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 2¼</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 1¼</tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of hair on the hind quarter</td><td align="center"><tt> 1¾</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 1¼</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> ¾</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> ¾</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 2 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 1 </tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of hair on the forehead</td><td align="center"><tt>16 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 8½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 6½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 5 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 3½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> ½</tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of the chin beard</td><td align="center"><tt>11½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 9½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 6¾</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 5 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 5 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 0 </tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of the breast tuft</td><td align="center"><tt> 8 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 8½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 8 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 6 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 5 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 3 </tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of tuft on fore leg</td><td align="center"><tt>10½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 8 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 8 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 4½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 3 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 1½</tt></td></tr>
<tr><td align="left">Length of the tail tuft</td><td align="center"><tt>19 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt>15 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt>15 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt>13 </tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 7½</tt></td><td align="center"><tt> 4½</tt></td></tr>
</table></div>
<p><br/></p>
<p><i>Albinism.</i>—Cases of albinism in the buffalo were of extremely rare
occurrence. I have met many old buffalo hunters, who had killed
thousands and seen scores of thousands of buffaloes, yet never had seen
a white one. From all accounts it appears that not over ten or eleven
white buffaloes, or white buffalo skins, were ever seen by white men.
Pied individuals were occasionally obtained, but even they were rare.
Albino buffaloes were always so highly prized that not a single one, so
far as I can learn, ever had the good fortune to attain adult size,
their appearance being so striking, in contrast with the other members
of the herd, as to draw upon them an unusual number of enemies, and
cause their speedy destruction.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page_415"></SPAN></span></p>
<p>At the New Orleans Exposition, in 1884-’85, the Territory of Dakota
exhibited, amongst other Western quadrupeds, the mounted skin of a
two-year-old buffalo which might fairly be called an albino. Although
not really white, it was of a uniform dirty cream-color, and showed not
a trace of the bison’s normal color on any part of its body.</p>
<p>Lieut. Col. S. C. Kellogg, U. S. Army, has on deposit in the National
Museum a tanned skin which is said to have come from a buffalo. It is
from an animal about one year old, and the hair upon it, which is short,
very curly or wavy, and rather coarse, is pure white. In length and
texture the hair does not in any one respect resemble the hair of a
yearling buffalo save in one particular,—along the median line of the
neck and hump there is a rather long, thin mane of hair, which has the
peculiar woolly appearance of genuine buffalo hair on those parts. On
the shoulder portions of the skin the hair is as short as on the hind
quarters. I am inclined to believe this rather remarkable specimen came
from a wild half-breed calf, the result of a cross between a white
domestic cow and a buffalo bull. At one time it was by no means uncommon
for small bunches of domestic cattle to enter herds of buffalo and
remain there permanently.</p>
<p>I have been informed that the late General Marcy possessed a white
buffalo skin. If it is still in existence, and is really <i>white</i>, it is
to be hoped that so great a rarity may find a permanent abiding place in
some museum where the remains of <i>Bison americanus</i> are properly
appreciated.</p>
<hr class="wide" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />