<h2><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P309"></SPAN></span><SPAN name="chapLI"></SPAN>LI<br/> THE EMPEROR CHARLES V</h2>
<p>The Holy Roman Empire came to a sort of climax in the reign of the Emperor
Charles V. He was one of the most extraordinary monarchs that Europe has ever
seen. For a time he had the air of being the greatest monarch since
Charlemagne.</p>
<p>His greatness was not of his own making. It was largely the
creation of his grandfather, the Emperor Maximilian I (1459-
1519). Some families have fought, others have intrigued
their way to world power; the Habsburgs married their way.
Maximilian began his career with Austria, Styria, part of
Alsace and other districts, the original Habsburg patrimony;
he married—the lady’s name scarcely matters to
us—the Netherlands and Burgundy. Most of Burgundy
slipped from him after his first wife’s death, but the
Netherlands he held. Then he tried unsuccessfully to marry
Brittany. He became Emperor in succession to his father,
Frederick III, in 1493, and married the duchy of Milan.
Finally he married his son to the weak-minded daughter of
Ferdinand and Isabella, the Ferdinand and Isabella of
Columbus, who not only reigned over a freshly united Spain
and over Sardinia and the kingdom of the two Sicilies, but
over all America west of Brazil. So it was that this Charles
V, his grandson, inherited most of the American continent and
between a third and a half of what the Turks had left of
Europe. He succeeded to the Netherlands in 1506. When his
grandfather Ferdinand died in 1516, he became practically
king of the Spanish dominions, his mother being imbecile; and
his grandfather Maximilian dying in 1519, he was in 1520
elected Emperor at the still comparatively tender age of
twenty.</p>
<p>He was a fair young man with a not very intelligent face, a
thick upper lip and a long clumsy chin. He found himself in
a world of young and vigorous personalities. It was an age
of brilliant young <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P310"></SPAN></span>monarchs. Francis I had succeeded
to the French throne in 1515 at the age of twenty-one, Henry
VIII had become King of England in 1509 at eighteen. It was
the age of Baber in India (1526-1530) and Suleiman the
Magnificent in Turkey (1520), both exceptionally capable
monarchs, and the Pope Leo X (1513) was also a very
distinguished Pope. The Pope and Francis I attempted to
prevent the election of Charles as Emperor because they
dreaded the concentration of so much power in the hands of
one man. Both Francis I and Henry VIII offered themselves to
the imperial electors. But there was now a long established
tradition of Habsburg Emperors (since 1273), and some
energetic bribery secured the election for Charles.</p>
<p>At first the young man was very much a magnificent puppet in
the hands of his ministers. Then slowly he began to assert
himself and take control. He began to realize something of
the threatening complexities of his exalted position. It was
a position as unsound as it was splendid.</p>
<p>From the very outset of his reign he was faced by the
situation created by Luther’s agitations in Germany.
The Emperor had one reason for siding with the reformers in
the opposition of the Pope to his election. But he had been
brought up in Spain, that most Catholic of countries, and he
decided against Luther. So he came into conflict with the
Protestant princes and particularly the Elector of Saxony.
He found himself in the presence of an opening rift that was
to split the outworn fabric of Christendom into two
contending camps. His attempts to close that rift were
strenuous and honest and ineffective. There was an extensive
peasant revolt in Germany which interwove with the general
political and religious disturbance. And these internal
troubles were complicated by attacks upon the Empire from
east and west alike. On the west of Charles was his spirited
rival, Francis I; to the east was the ever advancing Turk,
who was now in Hungary, in alliance with Francis and
clamouring for certain arrears of tribute from the Austrian
dominions. Charles had the money and army of Spain at his
disposal, but it was extremely difficult to get any effective
support in money from Germany. His social and political
troubles were complicated by financial distresses. He was
forced to ruinous borrowing.
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P311"></SPAN></span></p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="img-311"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/img-311.jpg" alt="THE CHARLES V PORTRAIT BY TITIAN" width-obs="600" height-obs="727" /> <p class="caption">
THE CHARLES V PORTRAIT BY TITIAN
<br/>
<small><i>(In the Gallery del Prado, Madrid)
<br/>
Photo: Anderson</i></small></p>
</div>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P312"></SPAN></span>On the whole,
Charles, in alliance with Henry VIII, was successful against
Francis I and the Turk. Their chief battlefield was North
Italy; the generalship was dull on both sides; their advances
and retreats depended mainly on the arrival of
reinforcements. The German army invaded France, failed to
take Marseilles, fell back into Italy, lost Milan, and was
besieged in Pavia. Francis I made a long and unsuccessful
siege of Pavia, was caught by fresh German forces, defeated,
wounded and taken prisoner. But thereupon the Pope and Henry
VIII, still haunted by the fear of his attaining excessive
power, turned against Charles. The German troops in Milan,
under the Constable of Bourbon, being unpaid, forced rather
than followed their commander into a raid upon Rome. They
stormed the city and pillaged it (1527). The Pope took
refuge in the Castle of St. Angelo while the looting and
slaughter went on. He bought off the German troops at last
by the payment of four hundred thousand ducats. Ten years of
such confused fighting impoverished all Europe. At last the
Emperor found himself triumphant in Italy. In 1530, he was
crowned by the Pope—he was the last German Emperor to
be so crowned—at Bologna.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Turks were making great headway in Hungary.
They had defeated and killed the king of Hungary in 1526,
they held Buda-Pesth, and in 1529 Suleiman the Magnificent
very nearly took Vienna. The Emperor was greatly concerned
by these advances, and did his utmost to drive back the
Turks, but he found the greatest difficulty in getting the
German princes to unite even with this formidable enemy upon
their very borders. Francis I remained implacable for a
time, and there was a new French war; but in 1538 Charles won
his rival over to a more friendly attitude after ravaging the
south of France. Francis and Charles then formed an alliance
against the Turk. But the Protestant princes, the German
princes who were resolved to break away from Rome, had formed
a league, the Schmalkaldic League, against the Emperor, and
in the place of a great campaign to recover Hungary for
Christendom Charles had to turn his mind to the gathering
internal struggle in Germany. Of that struggle he saw only
the opening war. It was a struggle, a sanguinary irrational
bickering of princes, for ascendancy, now <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P313"></SPAN></span>flaming into
war and destruction, now sinking back to intrigues and
diplomacies; it was a snake’s sack of princely policies
that was to go on writhing incurably right into the
nineteenth century and to waste and desolate Central Europe
again and again.</p>
<p>The Emperor never seems to have grasped the true forces at
work in these gathering troubles. He was for his time and
station an exceptionally worthy man, and he seems to have
taken the religious dissensions that were tearing Europe into
warring fragments as genuine theological differences. He
gathered diets and councils in futile attempts at
reconciliation. Formulæ and confessions were tried
over. The student of German history must struggle with the
details of the Religious Peace of Nuremberg, the settlement
at the Diet of Ratisbon, the Interim of Augsburg, and the
like. Here we do but mention them as details in the worried
life of this culminating Emperor. As a matter of fact,
hardly one of the multifarious princes and rulers in Europe
seems to have been acting in good faith. The widespread
religious trouble of the world, the desire of the common
people for truth and social righteousness, the spreading
knowledge of the time, all those things were merely counters
in the imaginations of princely diplomacy. Henry VIII of
England, who had begun his career with a book against heresy,
and who had been rewarded by the Pope with the title of
“Defender of the Faith,” being anxious to divorce
his first wife in favour of a young lady named Anne Boleyn,
and wishing also to loot the vast wealth of the church in
England, joined the company of Protestant princes in 1530.
Sweden, Denmark and Norway had already gone over to the
Protestant side.</p>
<p>The German religious war began in 1546, a few months after
the death of Martin Luther. We need not trouble about the
incidents of the campaign. The Protestant Saxon army was
badly beaten at Lochau. By something very like a breach of
faith Philip of Hesse, the Emperor’s chief remaining
antagonist, was caught and imprisoned, and the Turks were
bought off by the promise of an annual tribute. In 1547, to
the great relief of the Emperor, Francis I died. So by 1547
Charles got to a kind of settlement, and made his last
efforts to effect peace where there was no peace. In 1552
all Germany was at war again, only a precipitate flight from
Innsbruck <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P314"></SPAN></span>saved Charles from capture, and in
1552, with the treaty of Passau, came another unstable
equilibrium ....</p>
<p>Such is the brief outline of the politics of the Empire for
thirty-two years. It is interesting to note how entirely the
European mind was concentrated upon the struggle for European
ascendancy. Neither Turks, French, English nor Germans had
yet discovered any political interest in the great continent
of America, nor any significance in the new sea routes to
Asia. Great things were happening in America; Cortez with a
mere handful of men had conquered the great Neolithic empire
of Mexico for Spain, Pizarro had crossed the Isthmus of
Panama (1530) and subjugated another wonder-land, Peru. But
as yet these events meant no more to Europe than a useful and
stimulating influx of silver to the Spanish treasury.</p>
<p>It was after the treaty of Passau that Charles began to
display his distinctive originality of mind. He was now
entirely bored and disillusioned by his imperial greatness.
A sense of the intolerable futility of these European
rivalries came upon him. He had never been of a very sound
constitution, he was naturally indolent and he was suffering
greatly from gout. He abdicated. He made over all his
sovereign rights in Germany to his brother Ferdinand, and
Spain and the Netherlands he resigned to his son Philip.
Then in a sort of magnificent dudgeon he retired to a
monastery at Yuste, among the oak and chestnut forests in the
hills to the north of the Tagus valley. There he died in
1558.</p>
<p>Much has been written in a sentimental vein of this
retirement, this renunciation of the world by this tired
majestic Titan, world-weary, seeking in an austere solitude
his peace with God. But his retreat was neither solitary nor
austere; he had with him nearly a hundred and fifty
attendants: his establishment had all the splendour and
indulgences without the fatigues or a court, and Philip II
was a dutiful son to whom his father’s advice was a
command.</p>
<div class="fig"> <SPAN name="img-315"></SPAN> <ANTIMG src="images/img-315.jpg" alt="INTERIOR OF ST. PETER’S, ROME, SHOWING THE HIGH ALTAR" width-obs="550" height-obs="705" /> <p class="caption">
INTERIOR OF ST. PETER’S, ROME, SHOWING THE HIGH ALTAR
<br/>
<small><i>Photo: Alinari</i></small></p>
</div>
<p>And if Charles had lost his living interest in the
administration of European affairs, there were other motives
of a more immediate sort to stir him. Says Prescott:
“In the almost daily correspondence between Quixada, or
Gaztelu, and the Secretary of State at Valladolid, there is
scarcely a letter that does not turn more or less on the
Emperor’s eating or his illness. The one seems
naturally to follow, <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P315"></SPAN></span>like a running commentary, on the
other. It is rare that such topics have formed the burden of
communications with the department of state. It must have
been no easy matter for the secretary to preserve his gravity
in the perusal of despatches in which politics and gastronomy
were so strangely mixed together. The courier from
Valladolid to Lisbon was ordered to make a detour, so as to
take Jarandilla in his route, and bring supplies to the royal
table. On <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P316"></SPAN></span>Thursdays he was to bring fish to
serve for the jour maigre that was to follow. The trout in
the neighbourhood Charles thought too small, so others of a
larger size were to be sent from Valladolid. Fish of every
kind was to his taste, as, indeed, was anything that in its
nature or habits at all approached to fish. Eels, frogs,
oysters, occupied an important place in the royal bill of
fare. Potted fish, especially anchovies, found great favour
with him; and he regretted that he had not brought a better
supply of these from the Low Countries. On an eel-pasty he
particularly doted.” ... [<SPAN name="chapLIfn1text"></SPAN><SPAN href="#chapLIfn1">1</SPAN>]</p>
<p>In 1554 Charles had obtained a bull from Pope Julius III
granting him a dispensation from fasting, and allowing him to
break his fast early in the morning even when he was to take
the sacrament.</p>
<p>Eating and doctoring! it was a return to elemental things.
He had never acquired the habit of reading, but he would be
read aloud to at meals after the fashion of Charlemagne, and
would make what one narrator describes as a “sweet and
heavenly commentary.” He also amused himself with
mechanical toys, by listening to music or sermons, and by
attending to the imperial business that still came drifting
in to him. The death of the Empress, to whom he was greatly
attached, had turned his mind towards religion, which in his
case took a punctilious and ceremonial form; every Friday in
Lent he scourged himself with the rest of the monks with such
good will as to draw blood. These exercises and the gout
released a bigotry in Charles that had hitherto been
restrained by considerations of policy. The appearance of
Protestant teaching close at hand in Valladolid roused him to
fury. “Tell the grand inquisitor and his council from
me to be at their posts, and to lay the axe at the root of
the evil before it spreads further.” . .. He expressed
a doubt whether it would not be well, in so black an affair,
to dispense with the ordinary course of justice, and to show
no mercy; “lest the criminal, if pardoned, should have
the opportunity of repeating his crime.” He
recommended, as an example, his own mode or proceeding in the
Netherlands, “where all who remained obstinate in their
errors were burned alive, and those who were admitted to
penitence were beheaded.”</p>
<p>And almost symbolical of his place and role in history was
his <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="P317"></SPAN></span>preoccupation with funerals. He
seems to have had an intuition that something great was dead
in Europe and sorely needed burial, that there was a need to
write Finis, overdue. He not only attended every actual
funeral that was celebrated at Yuste, but he had services
conducted for the absent dead, he held a funeral service in
memory of his wife on the anniversary of her death, and
finally he celebrated his own obsequies.</p>
<p>“The chapel was hung with black, and the blaze of
hundreds of wax-lights was scarcely sufficient to dispel the
darkness. The brethren in their conventual dress, and all
the Emperor’s household clad in deep mourning, gathered
round a huge catafalque, shrouded also in black, which had
been raised in the centre of the chapel. The service for the
burial of the dead was then performed; and, amidst the dismal
wail of the monks, the prayers ascended for the departed
spirit, that it might be received into the mansions of the
blessed. The sorrowful attendants were melted to tears, as
the image of their master’s death was presented to
their minds—or they were touched, it may be, with
compassion by this pitiable display of weakness. Charles,
muffled in a dark mantle, and bearing a lighted candle in his
hand, mingled with his household, the spectator of his own
obsequies; and the doleful ceremony was concluded by his
placing the taper in the hands of the priest, in sign of his
surrendering up his soul to the Almighty.”</p>
<p>Within two months of this masquerade he was dead. And the
brief greatness of the Holy Roman Empire died with him. His
realm was already divided between his brother and his son.
The Holy Roman Empire struggled on indeed to the days of
Napoleon I but as an invalid and dying thing. To this day
its unburied tradition still poisons the political air.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="chapLIfn1"></SPAN>
[<SPAN href="#chapLIfn1text">1</SPAN>] Prescott’s Appendix to
Robertson’s <i>History of Charles V</i>.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />