Monitor and the Merrimac: Both sides of the story

<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN> <h1>THE MONITOR</h1> <h3>AND</h3> <h1>THE MERRIMAC</h1> <h4>BOTH SIDES OF THE STORY</h4> <h5> TOLD BY</h5> <h3>LIEUT. J.L. WORDEN, U.S.N.<br/> LIEUT. GREENE, U.S.N.</h3> <h5> OF THE MONITOR<br/> AND</h5> <h3> H. ASHTON RAMSAY, C.S.N.</h3> <h5>CHIEF ENGINEER OF THE MERRIMAC</h5> <h2><SPAN name="INTRODUCTION" id="INTRODUCTION"></SPAN>INTRODUCTION</h2> <p>This is the first-hand story of what was done and seen and felt on each side in the battle of the <i>Monitor</i> and the <i>Merrimac</i>. The actual experiences on both vessels are pictured, in one case by the commander of the <i>Monitor</i>, then a lieutenant, and the next in rank, Lieutenant Greene, and in the other by Chief-Engineer Ramsay of the <i>Merrimac</i>. Clearly such a record of personal experiences has a place by itself in the literature of the subject.</p> <p>It is quite unnecessary to dwell upon the various controversies which this battle has involved. As to the first use of armor, we know that France experimented with floating armored batteries in the Crimean War, and England had armored ships before 1862. As to the invention of the movable turret, which has been a bone of contention, the pages of Colonel Church's <i>Life of John Ericsson</i> and other books are open to the curious. The struggle of Ericsson to obtain official recognition, the raising of money, the hasty equipment of the <i>Monitor</i>, and the restraining orders under which she fought form a story supplementary to the battle, but of peculiar interest. The <i>Monitor</i> was ordered to act on the defensive. It was her mission first to protect the wooden ships. That explains certain misconceptions of her cautious attitude. And the fact that the powder charges for her Dahlgren guns were officially limited to fifteen pounds, although thirty and even fifty pounds were used with safety afterward, invites speculation upon the results if she had fought with a free hand.</p> <p>But the main result was reached. The Union fleet was saved. The career of the <i>Merrimac</i> was checked. No Union vessel was destroyed after the <i>Monitor</i> appeared. It seems proper to note these facts here, in view of the fact that Mr. Ramsay's fresh and striking story of the <i>Merrimac</i>, which is presented for the first time, enters upon the details of the battle more fully than the narrative of Lieutenant Worden and Lieutenant Greene. Fortunately the discussion has become academic in the half-century that has passed since Southern cheers over the first conquests of the <i>Merrimac</i> faltered before the acclaim which greeted the <i>Monitor's</i> achievement of her task. One may disagree with the phrasing of various historians on both sides, one may find it difficult to accept the inscription upon the shaft of the <i>Merrimac</i> outside the "Confederate White House" in Richmond, but no American can cease to wonder at the fortitude and daring of those other Americans who fought to the death in those hastily improvised crafts, bearing the brunt not only of battle, but of a strange and terrible experiment. It is not an argument that this book offers, but a saga of heroes, an illumination of qualities which have made our history in times of crisis.</p> <p>The year of this battle witnessed the destruction of both the vessels engaged. Mr. Ramsay describes the blowing-up of the <i>Merrimac</i>. An eye-witness of the sinking of the <i>Monitor</i> off Hatteras, Rear-Admiral E.W. Watson, who was an officer of the <i>Rhode Island</i>, which was towing the <i>Monitor</i> on that eventful night, has very kindly written a brief description of the tragedy for this book.</p> <hr style='width: 45%;' /> <p>The publishers desire to make acknowledgment to the representatives of the late Lucius E. Chittenden for the use of Part I of this book, which appears in Mr. Chittenden's most interesting volume, <i>Recollections of President Lincoln and his Administration</i>.</p> <hr style="width: 65%;" /> <div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />