<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0009" id="link2H_4_0009"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> SPURGEON AND HELL. </h2>
<p>Charles Lamb was one of the best men that ever lived. He had his failings,
but he never harmed anyone but himself. He was capable of astonishing
generosity, and those acquainted with the inner tragedy of his life know
that it was a long act of self-denial. He was also extremely modest but
not utterly devoid of indignation; and if he could not denounce bitterly,
he could speed a shaft of satire into the breast of wickedness or cruelty.
On one occasion, in the days of his youth, he was justly annoyed by his
friend Coleridge, whose character was very inferior to his own, though he
always assumed a tone of moral superiority. Lamb was so galled by
Coleridge's air of virtue and piety, at a moment when the humorist was
suffering terribly in consequence of his sister's calamity, that he sent
the transcendental poet a list of stinging questions. One of them asked
whether one of the seraphim could fall, and another whether a man might
not be damned without knowing it.</p>
<p>This last question suggests itself in the case of Mr. Spurgeon. Mrs.
Spurgeon, Dr. Pierson, and other of the great preacher's friends, are all
assuring us that he is in glory. Writing seven days after his death, Mrs.
Spurgeon said "he has now been a week in heaven." It is natural that she
should think so, and we do not wish to rob her of any consolation, nor do
we suppose that this article will ever come under her notice. But is it
not just possible that Spurgeon has gone to hell? And why should not the
question be raised? We mean no personal offence; we speak in the interest
of justice and truth. Spurgeon was very glib in preaching about hell, and
we do not know that he had a monopoly of that special line of business. He
never blenched at the idea of millions of human beings writhing in
everlasting torment; and why should it be blasphemy, or even incivility,
to wonder if he himself has gone to perdition?</p>
<p>Predestination, as the Church of England article says, is wonderfully
comforting to the elect; that is, to those who imagine themselves to be
so. But what if they are mistaken? What if a man, yea a fancied saint, may
be damned without knowing it? God Almighty has not published lists of the
Sect. Many a Calvinistic Pharisee is perhaps a self-elected saint after
all, and at the finish of his journey may find that he has been walking in
the wrong direction.</p>
<p>One of Spurgeon's rooted notions was that unbelievers were <i>sure</i> of
hell. They bore the mark of predestinate damnation broad upon their
fore-heads. Now at the bottom this means that a man may be damned for
believing wrongly. But how can anyone be sure that Spurgeon was absolutely
right? The Baptists are only one division of Christians. There are scores
of other divisions. All cannot be right, and all may be wrong. Even if one
is entirely right, how do we know it is the Baptists? According to the law
of probabilities, Spurgeon was very likely in the wrong; and if wrong
belief, however sincere, entails damnation, it is quite possible that at
11.5 p.m. on Sunday, January 31, Spurgeon entered Hell instead of Heaven.
*</p>
<p>* The next article will explain this matter.<br/></p>
<p>Far be it from us to wish a fellow creature in Hell, but there is always a
certain pleasure in seeing the engineer hoist with his own petard. All
tragedy has a touch of comedy. Fancy Spurgeon in Hades groaning "I sent
other people here by the million, and here I am myself."</p>
<p>How would this be worse than the groan of any other lost soul? Few men are
devils or angels. Most are neither black nor white, but grey. Between the
best and vilest how much difference is there in the eye of infinite
wisdom? And if God, the all-knowing and all-powerful, created men as they
are, strong and weak, wise and foolish, good, bad, and indifferent; there
is no more injustice in Spurgeon's burning in Hell than in the damnation
of the worst wretch that ever cursed the world.</p>
<p>Spurgeon used to preach hell with a certain gusto. Here is a hot and
strong passage from his sermon on the Resurrection of the Dead:</p>
<p>"When thou diest', thy soul will be tormented alone; that will be a hell
for it; but at the day of judgment thy body will join thy soul, and then
thou wilt have twin-hells, thy soul sweating drops of blood, and thy body
suffused with agony. In fire exactly like that which we have on earth thy
body will lie, asbestos-like, for ever unconsumed, all thy veins roads for
the feet of pain to travel on, every nerve a string on which the Devil
shall for ever play his diabolical tune of Hell's Unutterable Lament."</p>
<p>After preaching this awful doctrine a man should be ill for a fortnight.
Would it not afflict a kind-hearted man unspeakably to think that millions
of his fellow beings, or hundreds, or even one, would suffer such a
terrible fate? Would it not impair his sleep, and fill his dreams with
terror? But it did not have this effect on Spurgeon. After preaching hell
in that way, and rolling damnation over his tongue as a dainty morsel, he
went home, dined with a good appetite, drank his wine, and smoked his
cigar.</p>
<p>There was not the slightest doubt in Spurgeon's mind as to the endless
doom of the damned. Here is an extract from another sermon—</p>
<p>"Thou wilt look up there on the throne of God and it shall be written,
'For ever!' When the damned jingle the burning irons of their torment they
shall say, 'For ever!' When they howl, echo cries, 'For ever!'</p>
<p>'For ever' is written on their racks,<br/>
'For ever' on their chains;<br/>
'For ever' burneth in the fire,<br/>
'For ever' ever reigns."<br/></p>
<p>How bodies are to burn without consuming, how a fire could last for ever,
or how a good God could roast his own children in it, are questions that
Spurgeon did not stop to answer. He took the damnable doctrine of
damnation as he found it. He knew it was relished by myriads of callous,
foolish people; and it gave such a pungent flavor to a long sermon! His
listeners were not terrified. Oh dear no! Smith, the Newington
greengrocer, was not alarmed; he twirled his thumbs, and said to himself,
"Spurgeon's in fine form this morning!"</p>
<p>Archdeacon Farrar protests against the notion of a fiery, everlasting hell
as the result of fear, superstition, ignorance, hate, and slavish
letter-worship. He declares that he would resign all hope of immortality
to save a single human soul from the hell of Mr. Spurgeon. But is not the
hell of Mr. Spurgeon the hell of the New Testament? Does not Jesus speak
of everlasting fire? Why seek to limit the duration of hell by some
hocus-pocus of interpretation? It is idle to pretend that "everlasting"
means something less than everlasting. If it means that in relation to
hell it must also mean it in relation to heaven. Dr. Farrar cannot have
two different meanings for the same word in the same verse; and should he
ever go to hell (he will pardon us the supposition), how much consolation
would he derive from knowing that his doom was not "everlasting" but only
"eternal"? There was more honesty and straightforwardness in Mr. Spurgeon.
He preached what the Bible taught him. He set forth a hateful creed in its
true colors. His presentation of Christianity will continue to satisfy
those who belong to the past, but it will drive many others out of the
fold of faith into the broad pastures of Freethought.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />