<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0038" id="link2H_4_0038"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> LIVING BY FAITH. </h2>
<p>What is Faith? Faith, said Paul, "is the substance of things hoped for,
the evidence of things not seen." This is a faith that sensible men avoid.
The man of reason may have faith, but it will be a faith according to
knowledge, and not a faith that dispenses with knowledge. He believes that
the sun will rise to-morrow, that the ground will remain firm under his
feet, that the seasons will succeed each other in due course, and that if
he tills the ground he will reap the harvest. But his belief in these
things is based upon experience; his imagination extends the past into the
future, and his expectations are determined by his knowledge. The future
cannot indeed be demonstrated; it can only be predicted, and prediction
can never amount to an absolute certitude; yet it may amount to a height
of probability which is practically the same thing. Religious faith,
however, is something very different. It is not belief based on evidence,
but the evidence and the belief in one. The result is that persons who are
full of faith always regard a demand for evidence as at once a heresy and
an insult. Their faith seems to them, in the language of Paul, the very <i>substance</i>
of their hopes; and they often talk of the existence of God and the
divinity of Christ as being no less certain than their own existence.</p>
<p>Properly speaking, faith is trust. This involves a wide latitude beyond
our knowledge. If we trust a friend, we have faith in him, and we act upon
that sentiment. But we are sometimes deceived, and this shows that our
faith was in excess of our knowledge. Sometimes, indeed, it is quite
independent of knowledge. We trust people because we like them, or because
they like us. This infirmity is well known to sharpers and adventurers,
who invariably cultivate a pleasing manner, and generally practise the
arts of flattery. The same principle holds good in religion. It was
sagaciously remarked by Hume that we ought to suspect every agreeable
belief. The mass of mankind, however, are not so fastidious or
discriminating. On the contrary, they frequently believe a thing because
it <i>is</i> pleasant, and for no other reason. How often have we heard
Christian advocates prove the immortality of the soul to the complete
satisfaction of their auditors by simply harping on man's desire to live
for ever! Nay, there have been many great "philosophers" who have
demonstrated the same doctrine by exactly the same means.</p>
<p>Religious faith, to borrow a definition from <i>Chambers's Dictionary</i>,
is usually "belief in the statement of another." There are a few mystics
who profess to hold personal intercourse with God, but the majority, of
mankind take their religion on trust. They believe it because they were
taught it, and those who taught them believed it for the very same reason.
When you trace back the revelation to its beginning, you always find that
it is derived from men who lived a long time ago, or who perhaps never
lived at all. Mohammed vouches for the Koran. Yes, but who will vouch for
Mohammed?</p>
<p>Thomas Paine well said that what is revelation to the man who receives it,
is only hearsay to the man who gets it at secondhand. If anyone comes to
you with a message from God, first button your pockets, and then ask him
for his credentials. You will find that he has none. He can only tell you
what someone else told him. If you meet the original messenger, he can
only cry "thus saith the Lord," and bid you believe or be damned. To such
a haughty prophet one might well reply, "My dear sir, what you say may be
true, but it is very strange. Return to the being who sent you and ask him
to give you better credentials. His word may be proof to you, but yours is
no proof to me; and it seems reasonable to suppose that, if God had
anything to tell to me, he could communicate personally to me as well as
to you."</p>
<p>In ancient times the prophets who were thus accosted worked miracles in
attestation of their mission; but our modern prophets have no such power,
and therefore they can scarcely claim our belief. If they ask us why we
reject what they tell us on the authority of the ancient prophets who
possessed greater powers, we reply that what is a miracle to those who see
it is only a story to those who hear it, and that we prefer to see the
miracle ourselves. Telling us that a man rose from the dead is no reason
why we should believe that three times one are one; it is only proving one
wonder by another, and making a fresh draft on our credulity at every step
in the demonstration.</p>
<p>There are men who tell us that we should live by faith. But that is
impossible for all of us. The clergy live by faith, yet how could they do
so if there were not others to support them? Knaves cannot exist without
dupes, nor the Church without subscribers.</p>
<p>Living <i>by</i> faith is an easy profession. Living <i>on</i> faith,
however, is more arduous and precarious. Elijah is said to have subsisted
on food which was brought him by inspired ravens, but there are few of
God's ministers willing to follow his example. They ask God to give them
their daily bread, yet they would all shrink with horror from depending on
what he sends them.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />