<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0012" id="link2HCH0012"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter 12. The Negro as a Soldier </h2>
<p>There was in our regiment a very young recruit, named Sam Roberts, of whom
Trowbridge used to tell this story. Early in the war Trowbridge had been
once sent to Amelia Island with a squad of men, under direction of
Commodore Goldsborough, to remove the negroes from the island. As the
officers stood on the beach, talking to some of the older freedmen, they
saw this urchin peeping at them from front and rear in a scrutinizing way,
for which his father at last called him to account, as thus:—</p>
<p>"Hi! Sammy, what you's doin', chile?"</p>
<p>"Daddy," said the inquisitive youth, "don't you know mas'r tell us Yankee
hab tail? I don't see no tail, daddy!"</p>
<p>There were many who went to Port Royal during the war, in civil or
military positions, whose previous impressions of the colored race were
about as intelligent as Sam's view of themselves. But, for once, I had
always had so much to do with fugitive slaves, and had studied the whole
subject with such interest, that I found not much to learn or unlearn as
to this one point. Their courage I had before seen tested; their docile
and lovable qualities I had known; and the only real surprise that
experience brought me was in finding them so little demoralized. I had not
allowed for the extreme remoteness and seclusion of their lives,
especially among the Sea Islands. Many of them had literally spent their
whole existence on some lonely island or remote plantation, where the
master never came, and the overseer only once or twice a week. With these
exceptions, such persons had never seen a white face, and of the
excitements or sins of larger communities they had not a conception. My
friend Colonel Hallo-well, of the Fifty-Fourth Massachusetts, told me that
he had among his men some of the worst reprobates of Northern cities.
While I had some men who were unprincipled and troublesome, there was not
one whom I could call a hardened villain. I was constantly expecting to
find male Topsies, with no notions of good and plenty of evil. But I never
found one. Among the most ignorant there was very often a childlike
absence of vices, which was rather to be classed as inexperience than as
innocence, but which had some of the advantages of both.</p>
<p>Apart from this, they were very much like other men. General Saxton,
examining with some impatience a long list of questions from some
philanthropic Commission at the North, respecting the traits and habits of
the freedmen, bade some staff-officer answer them all in two words,—"Intensely
human." We all admitted that it was a striking and comprehensive
description.</p>
<p>For instance, as to courage. So far as I have seen, the mass of men are
naturally courageous up to a certain point. A man seldom runs away from
danger which he ought to face, unless others run; each is apt to keep with
the mass, and colored soldiers have more than usual of this
gregariousness. In almost every regiment, black or white, there are a
score or two of men who are naturally daring, who really hunger after
dangerous adventures, and are happiest when allowed to seek them. Every
commander gradually finds out who these men are, and habitually uses them;
certainly I had such, and I remember with delight their bearing, their
coolness, and their dash. Some of them were negroes, some mulattoes. One
of them would have passed for white, with brown hair and blue eyes, while
others were so black you could hardly see their features. These picked men
varied in other respects too; some were neat and well-drilled soldiers,
while others were slovenly, heedless fellows,—the despair of their
officers at inspection, their pride on a raid. They were the natural
scouts and rangers of the regiment; they had the
two-o'clock-in-the-morning courage, which Napoleon thought so rare. The
mass of the regiment rose to the same level under excitement, and were
more excitable, I think, than whites, but neither more nor less
courageous.</p>
<p>Perhaps the best proof of a good average of courage among them was in the
readiness they always showed for any special enterprise. I do not remember
ever to have had the slightest difficulty in obtaining volunteers, but
rather in keeping down the number. The previous pages include many
illustrations of this, as well as of then: endurance of pain and
discomfort. For instance, one of my lieutenants, a very daring Irishman,
who had served for eight years as a sergeant of regular artillery in
Texas, Utah, and South Carolina, said he had never been engaged in
anything so risky as our raid up the St. Mary's. But in truth it seems to
me a mere absurdity to deliberately argue the question of courage, as
applied to men among whom I waked and slept, day and night, for so many
months together. As well might he who has been wandering for years upon
the desert, with a Bedouin escort, discuss the courage of the men whose
tents have been his shelter and whose spears his guard. We, their
officers, did not go there to teach lessons, but to receive them. There
were more than a hundred men in the ranks who had voluntarily met more
dangers in their escape from slavery than any of my young captains had
incurred in all their lives.</p>
<p>There was a family named Wilson, I remember, of which we had several
representatives. Three or four brothers had planned an escape from the
interior to our lines; they finally decided that the youngest should stay
and take care of the old mother; the rest, with their sister and her
children, came in a "dug-out" down one of the rivers. They were fired
upon, again and again, by the pickets along the banks, until finally every
man on board was wounded; and still they got safely through. When the
bullets began to fly about them, the woman shed tears, and her little girl
of nine said to her, "Don't cry, mother, Jesus will help you," and then
the child began praying as the wounded men still urged the boat along.
This the mother told me, but I had previously heard it from on officer who
was on the gunboat that picked them up,—a big, rough man, whose
voice fairly broke as he described their appearance. He said that the
mother and child had been hid for nine months in the woods before
attempting their escape, and the child would speak to no one,—indeed,
she hardly would when she came to our camp. She was almost white, and this
officer wished to adopt her, but the mother said, "I would do anything but
that for <i>oonah</i>," this being a sort of Indian formation of the
second-person-plural, such as they sometimes use. This same officer
afterwards saw a reward offered for this family in a Savannah paper.</p>
<p>I used to think that I should not care to read "Uncle Tom's Cabin" hi our
camp; it would have seemed tame. Any group of men in a tent would have had
more exciting tales to tell. I needed no fiction when I had Fanny Wright,
for instance, daily passing to and fro before my tent, with her shy little
girl clinging to her skirts. Fanny was a modest little mulatto woman, a
soldier's wife, and a company laundress. She had escaped from the
main-land in a boat, with that child and another. Her baby was shot dead
in her arms, and she reached our lines with one child safe on earth and
the other in heaven. I never found it needful to give any elementary
instructions in courage to Fanny's husband, you may be sure.</p>
<p>There was another family of brothers in the regiment named Miller. Their
grandmother, a fine-looking old woman, nearly seventy, I should think, but
erect as a pine-tree, used sometimes to come and visit them. She and her
husband had once tried to escape from a plantation near Savannah. They had
failed, and had been brought back; the husband had received five hundred
lashes, and while the white men on the plantation were viewing the
punishment, she was collecting her children and grandchildren, to the
number of twenty-two, in a neighboring marsh, preparatory to another
attempt that night. They found a flat-boat which had been rejected as
unseaworthy, got on board,—still under the old woman's orders,—and
drifted forty miles down the river to our lines. Trowbridge happened to be
on board the gunboat which picked them up, and he said that when the
"flat" touched the side of the vessel, the grandmother rose to her full
height, with her youngest grandchild in her arms, and said only, "My God!
are we free?" By one of those coincidences of which life is full, her
husband escaped also, after his punishment, and was taken up by the same
gunboat.</p>
<p>I hardly need point out that my young lieutenants did not have to teach
the principles of courage to this woman's grandchildren.</p>
<p>I often asked myself why it was that, with this capacity of daring and
endurance, they had not kept the land in a perpetual flame of
insurrection; why, especially since the opening of the war, they had kept
so still. The answer was to be found in the peculiar temperament of the
races, in their religious faith, and in the habit of patience that
centuries had fortified. The shrewder men all said substantially the same
thing. What was the use of insurrection, where everything was against
them? They had no knowledge, no money, no arms, no drill, no organization,—above
all, no mutual confidence. It was the tradition among them that all
insurrections were always betrayed by somebody. They had no mountain
passes to defend like the Maroons of Jamaica,—no unpenetrable
swamps, like the Maroons of Surinam. Where they had these, even on a small
scale, they had used them,—as in certain swamps round Savannah and
in the everglades of Florida, where they united with the Indians, and
would stand fire—so I was told by General Saxton, who had fought
them there—when the Indians would retreat.</p>
<p>It always seemed to me that, had I been a slave, my life would have been
one long scheme of insurrection. But I learned to respect the patient
self-control of those who had waited till the course of events should open
a better way. When it came they accepted it. Insurrection on their part
would at once have divided the Northern sentiment; and a large part of our
army would have joined with the Southern army to hunt them down. By their
waiting till we needed them, their freedom was secured.</p>
<p>Two things chiefly surprised me in their feeling toward their former
masters,—the absence of affection and the absence of revenge. I
expected to find a good deal of the patriarchal feeling. It always seemed
to me a very ill-applied emotion, as connected with the facts and laws of
American slavery,—still I expected to find it. I suppose that my men
and their families and visitors may have had as much of it as the mass of
freed slaves; but certainly they had not a particle. I never could cajole
one of them, in his most discontented moment, into regretting "ole mas'r
time" for a single instant. I never heard one speak of the masters except
as natural enemies. Yet they were perfectly discriminating as to
individuals; many of them claimed to have had kind owners, and some
expressed great gratitude to them for particular favors received. It was
not the individuals, but the ownership, of which they complained. That
they saw to be a wrong which no special kindnesses could right. On this,
as on all points connected with slavery, they understood the matter as
clearly as Garrison or Phillips; the wisest philosophy could teach them
nothing as to that, nor could any false philosophy befog them. After all,
personal experience is the best logician.</p>
<p>Certainly this indifference did not proceed from any want of personal
affection, for they were the most affectionate people among whom I had
ever lived. They attached themselves to every officer who deserved love,
and to some who did not; and if they failed to show it to their masters,
it proved the wrongfulness of the mastery. On the other hand, they rarely
showed one gleam of revenge, and I shall never forget the self-control
with which one of our best sergeants pointed out to me, at Jacksonville,
the very place where one of his brothers had been hanged by the whites for
leading a party of fugitive slaves. He spoke of it as a historic matter,
without any bearing on the present issue.</p>
<p>But side by side with this faculty of patience, there was a certain
tropical element in the men, a sort of fiery ecstasy when aroused, which
seemed to link them by blood with the French Turcos, and made them really
resemble their natural enemies, the Celts, far more than the Anglo-Saxon
temperament. To balance this there were great individual resources when
alone,—a sort of Indian wiliness and subtlety of resource. Their
gregariousness and love of drill made them more easy to keep in hand than
white American troops, who rather like to straggle or go in little squads,
looking out for themselves, without being bothered with officers. The
blacks prefer organization.</p>
<p>The point of inferiority that I always feared, though I never had occasion
to prove it, was that they might show less fibre, less tough and dogged
resistance, than whites, during a prolonged trial,—a long,
disastrous march, for instance, or the hopeless defence of a besieged
town. I should not be afraid of their mutinying or running away, but of
their drooping and dying. It might not turn out so; but I mention it for
the sake of fairness, and to avoid overstating the merits of these troops.
As to the simple general fact of courage and reliability I think no
officer in our camp ever thought of there being any difference between
black and white. And certainly the opinions of these officers, who for
years risked their lives every moment on the fidelity of their men, were
worth more than those of all the world beside.</p>
<p>No doubt there were reasons why this particular war was an especially
favorable test of the colored soldiers. They had more to fight for than
the whites. Besides the flag and the Union, they had home and wife and
child. They fought with ropes round their necks, and when orders were
issued that the officers of colored troops should be put to death on
capture, they took a grim satisfaction. It helped their <i>esprit de corps</i>
immensely. With us, at least, there was to be no play-soldier. Though they
had begun with a slight feeling of inferiority to the white troops, this
compliment substituted a peculiar sense of self-respect. And even when the
new colored regiments began to arrive from the North my men still pointed
out this difference,—that in case of ultimate defeat, the Northern
troops, black or white, would go home, while the First South Carolina must
fight it out or be re-enslaved. This was one thing that made the St.
John's River so attractive to them and even to me;—it was so much
nearer the everglades. I used seriously to ponder, during the darker
periods of the war, whether I might not end my days as an outlaw,—a
leader of Maroons.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I used to try to make some capital for the Northern troops, in
their estimate, by pointing out that it was a disinterested thing in these
men from the free States, to come down there and fight, that the slaves
might be free. But they were apt keenly to reply, that many of the white
soldiers disavowed this object, and said that that was not the object of
the war, nor even likely to be its end. Some of them even repeated Mr.
Seward's unfortunate words to Mr. Adams, which some general had been heard
to quote. So, on the whole, I took nothing by the motion, as was apt to be
the case with those who spoke a good word for our Government, in those
vacillating and half proslavery days.</p>
<p>At any rate, this ungenerous discouragement had this good effect, that it
touched their pride; they would deserve justice, even if they did not
obtain it. This pride was afterwards severely tested during the
disgraceful period when the party of repudiation in Congress temporarily
deprived them of their promised pay. In my regiment the men never
mutinied, nor even threatened mutiny; they seemed to make it a matter of
honor to do then: part, even if the Government proved a defaulter; but one
third of them, including the best men in the regiment, quietly refused to
take a dollar's pay, at the reduced price. "We'se gib our sogerin' to de
Guv'ment, Gunnel," they said, "but we won't 'spise ourselves so much for
take de seben dollar." They even made a contemptuous ballad, of which I
once caught a snatch.</p>
<p>"Ten dollar a month!<br/>
Tree ob dat for clothin'l<br/>
Go to Washington<br/>
Fight for Linkum's darter!"<br/></p>
<p>This "Lincoln's daughter" stood for the Goddess of Liberty, it would seem.
They would be true to her, but they would not take the half-pay. This was
contrary to my advice, and to that of other officers; but I now think it
was wise. Nothing less than this would have called the attention of the
American people to this outrageous fraud.*</p>
<p>* See Appendix.</p>
<p>The same slow forecast had often marked their action in other ways. One of
our ablest sergeants, Henry Mclntyre, who had earned two dollars and a
half per day as a master-carpenter in Florida, and paid one dollar and a
half to his master, told me that he had deliberately refrained from
learning to read, because that knowledge exposed the slaves to so much
more watching and suspicion. This man and a few others had built on
contract the greater part of the town of Micanopy in Florida, and was a
thriving man when his accustomed discretion failed for once, and he lost
all. He named his child William Lincoln, and it brought upon him such
suspicion that he had to make his escape.</p>
<p>I cannot conceive what people at the North mean by speaking of the negroes
as a bestial or brutal race. Except in some insensibility to animal pain,
I never knew of an act in my regiment which I should call brutal. In
reading Kay's "Condition of the English Peasantry" I was constantly struck
with the unlikeness of my men to those therein described. This could not
proceed from my prejudices as an abolitionist, for they would have led me
the other way, and indeed I had once written a little essay to show the
brutalizing influences of slavery. I learned to think that we
abolitionists had underrated the suffering produced by slavery among the
negroes, but had overrated the demoralization. Or rather, we did not know
how the religious temperament of the negroes had checked the
demoralization. Yet again, it must be admitted that this temperament, born
of sorrow and oppression, is far more marked in the slave than in the
native African.</p>
<p>Theorize as we may, there was certainly in our camp an average tone of
propriety which all visitors noticed, and which was not created, but only
preserved by discipline. I was always struck, not merely by the courtesy
of the men, but also by a certain sober decency of language. If a man had
to report to me any disagreeable fact, for instance, he was sure to do it
with gravity and decorum, and not blurt it out in an offensive way. And it
certainly was a significant fact that the ladies of our camp, when we were
so fortunate as to have such guests, the young wives, especially, of the
adjutant and quartermaster, used to go among the tents when the men were
off duty, in order to hear their big pupils read and spell, without the
slightest fear of annoyance. I do not mean direct annoyance or insult, for
no man who valued his life would have ventured that in presence of the
others, but I mean the annoyance of accidentally seeing or hearing
improprieties not intended for them. They both declared that they would
not have moved about with anything like the same freedom in any white camp
they had ever entered, and it always roused their indignation to hear the
negro race called brutal or depraved.</p>
<p>This came partly from natural good manners, partly from the habit of
deference, partly from ignorance of the refined and ingenious evil which
is learned in large towns; but a large part came from their strongly
religious temperament. Their comparative freedom from swearing, for
instance,—an abstinence which I fear military life did not
strengthen,—was partly a matter of principle. Once I heard one of
them say to another, in a transport of indignation, "Ha-a-a, boy, s'pose I
no be a Christian, I cuss you sol"—which was certainly drawing
pretty hard upon the bridle. "Cuss," however, was a generic term for all
manner of evil speaking; they would say, "He cuss me fool," or "He cuss me
coward," as if the essence of propriety were in harsh and angry speech,—which
I take to be good ethics. But certainly, if Uncle Toby could have
recruited his army in Flanders from our ranks, their swearing would have
ceased to be historic.</p>
<p>It used to seem to me that never, since Cromwell's time, had there been
soldiers in whom the religious element held such a place. "A religious
army," "a gospel army," were their frequent phrases. In their
prayer-meetings there was always a mingling, often quaint enough, of the
warlike and the pious. "If each one of us was a praying man," said
Corporal Thomas Long in a sermon, "it appears to me that we could fight as
well with prayers as with bullets,—for the Lord has said that if you
have faith even as a grain of mustard-seed cut into four parts, you can
say to the sycamore-tree, Arise, and it will come up." And though Corporal
Long may have got a little perplexed in his botany, his faith proved
itself by works, for he volunteered and went many miles on a solitary
scouting expedition into the enemy's country in Florida, and got back
safe, after I had given him up for lost.</p>
<p>The extremes of religious enthusiasm I did not venture to encourage, for I
could not do it honestly; neither did I discourage them, but simply
treated them with respect, and let them have their way, so long as they
did not interfere with discipline. In general they promoted it. The
mischievous little drummer-boys, whose scrapes and quarrels were the
torment of my existence, might be seen kneeling together in their tents to
say their prayers at night, and I could hope that their slumbers were
blessed by some spirit of peace, such as certainly did not rule over their
waking. The most reckless and daring fellows in the regiment were perfect
fatalists in theur confidence that God would watch over them, and that if
they died, it would be because theur time had come. This almost excessive
faith, and the love of freedom and of their families, all co-operated with
their pride as soldiers to make them do their duty. I could not have
spared any of these incentives. Those of our officers who were personally
the least influenced by such considerations, still saw the need of
encouraging them among the men.</p>
<p>I am bound to say that this strongly devotional turn was not always
accompanied by the practical virtues; but neither was it strikingly
divorced from them. A few men, I remember, who belonged to the ancient
order of hypocrites, but not many. Old Jim Cushman was our favorite
representative scamp. He used to vex his righteous soul over the admission
of the unregenerate to prayer-meetings, and went off once shaking his head
and muttering, "Too much goat shout wid de sheep." But he who objected to
this profane admixture used to get our mess-funds far more hopelessly
mixed with his own, when he went out to buy chickens. And I remember that,
on being asked by our Major, in that semi-Ethiopian dialect into which we
sometimes slid, "How much wife you got, Jim?" the veteran replied, with a
sort of penitence for lost opportunities, "On'y but four, Sah!"</p>
<p>Another man of somewhat similar quality went among us by the name of Henry
Ward Beecher, from a remarkable resemblance in face and figure to that
sturdy divine. I always felt a sort of admiration for this worthy, because
of the thoroughness with which he outwitted me, and the sublime impudence
in which he culminated. He got a series of passes from me, every week or
two, to go and see his wife on a neighboring plantation, and finally, when
this resource seemed exhausted, he came boldly for one more pass, that he
might go and be married.</p>
<p>We used to quote <i>him</i> a good deal, also, as a sample of a certain
Shakespearian boldness of personification in which the men sometimes
indulged. Once, I remember, his captain had given him a fowling-piece to
clean. Henry Ward had left it in the captain's tent, and the latter,
finding it, had transferred the job to some one else.</p>
<p>Then came a confession, in this precise form, with many dignified
gesticulations:—</p>
<p>"Cappen! I took dat gun, and I put bun in Cappen tent. Den I look, and de
gun not dar! Den Conscience say, Cappen mus' hab gib dat gun to somebody
else for clean. Den I say, Conscience, you reason correck."</p>
<p>Compare Lancelot Gobbo's soliloquy in the "Two Gentlemen of Verona"!</p>
<p>Still, I maintain that, as a whole, the men were remarkably free from
inconvenient vices. There was no more lying and stealing than in average
white regiments. The surgeon was not much troubled by shamming sickness,
and there were not a great many complaints of theft. There was less
quarrelling than among white soldiers, and scarcely ever an instance of
drunkenness. Perhaps the influence of their officers had something to do
with this; for not a ration of whiskey was ever issued to the men, nor did
I ever touch it, while in the army, nor approve a requisition for any of
the officers, without which it could not easily be obtained. In this
respect our surgeons fortunately agreed with me, and we never had reason
to regret it. I believe the use of ardent spirits to be as useless and
injurious in the army as on board ship, and among the colored troops,
especially, who had never been accustomed to it, I think that it did only
harm.</p>
<p>The point of greatest laxity in their moral habits—the want of a
high standard of chastity—was not one which affected their camp life
to any great extent, and it therefore came less under my observation. But
I found to my relief that, whatever their deficiency in this respect, it
was modified by the general quality of their temperament, and indicated
rather a softening and relaxation than a hardening and brutalizing of
their moral natures. Any insult or violence in this direction was a thing
unknown. I never heard of an instance. It was not uncommon for men to have
two or three wives in different plantations,—the second, or remoter,
partner being called a "'broad wife,"—i.e. wife abroad. But the
whole tendency was toward marriage, and this state of things was only
regarded as a bequest from "mas'r time."</p>
<p>I knew a great deal about their marriages, for they often consulted me,
and took my counsel as lovers are wont to do,—that is, when it
pleased their fancy. Sometimes they would consult their captains first,
and then come to me in despairing appeal. "Cap'n Scroby [Trowbridge] he
acvise me not for marry dis lady, 'cause she hab seben chil'en. What for
use? Cap'n Scroby can't lub for me. I mus' lub for myself, and I lub he."
I remember that on this occasion "he" stood by, a most unattractive woman,
jet black, with an old pink muslin dress, torn white cotton gloves, and a
very flowery bonnet, that must have descended through generations of
tawdry mistresses.</p>
<p>I felt myself compelled to reaffirm the decision of the inferior court.
The result was as usual. They were married the next day, and I believe
that she proved an excellent wife, though she had seven children, whose
father was also in the regiment. If she did not, I know many others who
did, and certainly I have never seen more faithful or more happy marriages
than among that people.</p>
<p>The question was often asked, whether the Southern slaves or the Northern
free blacks made the best soldiers. It was a compliment to both classes
that each officer usually preferred those whom he had personally
commanded. I preferred those who had been slaves, for their greater
docility and affectionateness, for the powerful stimulus which their new
freedom gave, and for the fact that they were fighting, in a manner, for
their own homes and firesides. Every one of these considerations afforded
a special aid to discipline, and cemented a peculiar tie of sympathy
between them and their officers. They seemed like clansmen, and had a more
confiding and filial relation to us than seemed to me to exist in the
Northern colored regiments.</p>
<p>So far as the mere habits of slavery went, they were a poor preparation
for military duty. Inexperienced officers often assumed that, because
these men had been slaves before enlistment, they would bear to be treated
as such afterwards. Experience proved the contrary. The more strongly we
marked the difference between the slave and the soldier, the better for
the regiment. One half of military duty lies in obedience, the other half
in self-respect. A soldier without self-respect is worthless. Consequently
there were no regiments in which it was so important to observe the
courtesies and proprieties of military life as in these. I had to caution
the officers to be more than usually particular in returning the
salutations of the men; to be very careful in their dealings with those on
picket or guard-duty; and on no account to omit the titles of the
non-commissioned officers. So, in dealing out punishments, we had
carefully to avoid all that was brutal and arbitrary, all that savored of
the overseer. Any such dealing found them as obstinate and contemptuous as
was Topsy when Miss Ophelia undertook to chastise her. A system of light
punishments, rigidly administered according to the prescribed military
forms, had more weight with them than any amount of angry severity. To
make them feel as remote as possible from the plantation, this was
essential. By adhering to this, and constantly appealing to their pride as
soldiers and their sense of duty, we were able to maintain a high standard
of discipline,—so, at least, the inspecting officers said,—and
to get rid, almost entirely, of the more degrading class of punishments,—standing
on barrels, tying up by the thumbs, and the ball and chain.</p>
<p>In all ways we had to educate their self-respect. For instance, at first
they disliked to obey their own non-commissioned officers. "I don't want
him to play de white man ober me," was a sincere objection. They had been
so impressed with a sense of inferiority that the distinction extended to
the very principles of honor. "I ain't got colored-man principles," said
Corporal London Simmons, indignantly defending himself from some charge
before me. "I'se got white-gemman principles. I'se do my best. If Cap'n
tell me to take a man, s'pose de man be as big as a house, I'll clam hold
on him till I die, inception [excepting] I'm sick."</p>
<p>But it was plain that this feeling was a bequest of slavery, which
military life would wear off. We impressed it upon them that they did not
obey their officers because they were white, but because they were their
officers, just as the Captain must obey me, and I the General; that we
were all subject to military law, and protected by it in turn. Then we
taught them to take pride in having good material for noncommissioned
officers among themselves, and in obeying them. On my arrival there was
one white first sergeant, and it was a question whether to appoint others.
This I prevented, but left that one, hoping the men themselves would at
last petition for his removal, which at length they did. He was at once
detailed on other duty. The picturesqueness of the regiment suffered, for
he was very tall and fair, and I liked to see him step forward in the
centre when the line of first sergeants came together at dress-parade. But
it was a help to discipline to eliminate the Saxon, for it recognized a
principle.</p>
<p>Afterwards I had excellent battalion-drills without a single white
officer, by way of experiment; putting each company under a sergeant, and
going through the most difficult movements, such as division-columns and
oblique-squares. And as to actual discipline, it is doing no injustice to
the line-officers of the regiment to say that none of them received from
the men more implicit obedience than Color-Sergeant Rivers. I should have
tried to obtain commissions for him and several others before I left the
regiment, had their literary education been sufficient; and such an
attempt was finally made by Lieutenant-Colonel Trowbridge, my successor in
immediate command, but it proved unsuccessful. It always seemed to me an
insult to those brave men to have novices put over their heads, on the
ground of color alone; and the men felt it the more keenly as they
remained longer in service. There were more than seven hundred enlisted
men in the regiment, when mustered out after more than three years'
service. The ranks had been kept full by enlistment, but there were only
fourteen line-officers instead of the full thirty. The men who should have
filled those vacancies were doing duty as sergeants in the ranks.</p>
<p>In what respect were the colored troops a source of disappointment? To me
in one respect only,—that of health. Their health improved, indeed,
as they grew more familiar with military life; but I think that neither
their physical nor moral temperament gave them that toughness, that
obstinate purpose of living, which sustains the more materialistic
Anglo-Saxon. They had not, to be sure, the same predominant diseases,
suffering in the pulmonary, not in the digestive organs; but they suffered
a good deal. They felt malaria less, but they were more easily choked by
dust and made ill by dampness. On the other hand, they submitted more
readily to sanitary measures than whites, and, with efficient officers,
were more easily kept clean. They were injured throughout the army by an
undue share of fatigue duty, which is not only exhausting but demoralizing
to a soldier; by the un-suitableness of the rations, which gave them salt
meat instead of rice and hominy; and by the lack of good medical
attendance. Their childlike constitutions peculiarly needed prompt and
efficient surgical care; but almost all the colored troops were enlisted
late in the war, when it was hard to get good surgeons for any regiments,
and especially for these. In this respect I had nothing to complain of,
since there were no surgeons in the army for whom I would have exchanged
my own.</p>
<p>And this late arrival on the scene affected not only the medical
supervision of the colored troops, but their opportunity for a career. It
is not my province to write their history, nor to vindicate them, nor to
follow them upon those larger fields compared with which the adventures of
my regiment appear but a partisan warfare. Yet this, at least, may be
said. The operations on the South Atlantic coast, which long seemed a
merely subordinate and incidental part of the great contest, proved to be
one of the final pivots on which it turned. All now admit that the fate of
the Confederacy was decided by Sherman's march to the sea. Port Royal was
the objective point to which he marched, and he found the Department of
the South, when he reached it, held almost exclusively by colored troops.
Next to the merit of those who made the march was that of those who held
open the door. That service will always remain among the laurels of the
black regiments.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />