<h2><SPAN name="III"></SPAN>III</h2>
<h3>A CENTURY OF COLONIAL HISTORY, 1660-1760</h3>
<h4>Books for Study and Reading</h4>
<p><b>References</b>.--Fiske's <i>United States for Schools</i>
133-180; McMaster's <i>School History</i>, 93-108 (life in 1763);
<i>Source-Book</i>, ch. vii; Fisher's <i>Colonial Era</i>; Earle's
<i>Child Life</i>.</p>
<p><b>Home Readings</b>.--Parkman's <i>Montcalm and Wolfe</i>;
Franklin's <i>Autobiography</i>; Brooks's <i>In Leisler's
Times</i>; Coffin's <i>Old Times in the Colonies</i>; Cooper's
<i>Last of the Mohicans</i>; Scudder's <i>Men and Manners One
Hundred Years Ago</i>.</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<hr style="width: 35%;">
<br/>
<br/>
<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_8"></SPAN>CHAPTER 8</h2>
<h3>THE COLONIES UNDER CHARLES II</h3>
<p class="side">The Puritan in England. Higginson and Channing,
<i>English History for Americans</i>, 182-195.<br/>
The Colonies, 1649-60.</p>
<p><b>65. The Puritans and the Colonists, 1649-60.</b>--In 1649
Charles I was executed, and for eleven years the Puritans were
supreme in England. During this time the New England colonists
governed themselves, and paid little heed to the wishes and orders
of England's rulers. After some hesitation, the Virginians accepted
the authority of Cromwell and the Puritans. In return they were
allowed to govern themselves. In Maryland the Puritans overturned
Baltimore's governor and ruled the province for some years.</p>
<p class="side">The Restoration, 1660. <i>English History for
Americans</i>, 196.<br/>
The Navigation Laws.</p>
<p><b>66. Colonial Policy of Charles II.</b>--In 1660 Charles II
became king of England or was "restored" to the throne, as people
said at the time. Almost at once there was a great revival of
interest in colonization, and the new government interfered
vigorously in colonial affairs. In 1651 the Puritans had begun the
system of giving the English trade only to English merchants and
shipowners. This system was now extended, and the more important
colonial products could be carried only to English ports.</p>
<p class="side">Charles II and Massachusetts.<br/>
Massachusetts and the Quakers. <i>Higginson</i>, 80-81.</p>
<p><b>67. Attacks on Massachusetts.</b>--The new government was
especially displeased by the independent spirit shown by
Massachusetts. Only good Puritans could vote in that colony, and
members of the Church of England could not even worship as they
wished. The Massachusetts people paid no heed whatever to the
navigation laws and asserted that acts of Parliament had no force
in the colony. It chanced that at this time Massachusetts had
placed herself clearly in the wrong by hanging four persons for no
other reason than that they were Quakers. The English government
thought that now the time had come to assert its power. It ordered
the Massachusetts rulers to send other Quakers to England for
trial. But, when this order reached Massachusetts, there were no
Quakers in prison awaiting trial, and none were ever sent to
England.</p>
<p class="side">Charters of Connecticut and Rhode Island,
1662-63.<br/>
New Haven absorbed by Connecticut.</p>
<p><b>68. Connecticut and Rhode Island.</b>--While the English
government was attacking Massachusetts it was giving most liberal
charters to Connecticut and to Rhode Island. Indeed, these charters
were so liberal that they remained the constitutions of the states
of Connecticut and Rhode Island until long after the American
Revolution. The Connecticut charter included New Haven within the
limits of the larger colony and thus put an end to the separate
existence of New Haven.</p>
<br/>
<p class="ctr"><ANTIMG src="images/063.jpg" width-obs="60%" alt=""><br/>
<b>THE OLDEST CHURCH SOUTH OF THE POTOMAC.</b></p>
<br/>
<p class="side">The English conquest of New Netherland, 1664.
<i>Higginson</i>. 97-98.</p>
<p><b>69. Conquest of New Netherland, 1664.</b>--The English
government now determined to conquer New Netherland. An English
fleet sailed to New Amsterdam. Stuyvesant thumped up and down on
his wooden leg. But he was almost the only man in New Amsterdam who
wanted to fight. He soon surrendered, and New Netherland became an
English colony. The Dutch later recaptured it and held it for a
time; but in 1674 they finally handed it over to England.</p>
<p class="side">New Netherland given to the Duke of York and
Albany.</p>
<p><b>70. New York.</b>--Even before the colony was seized in 1664,
Charles II gave it away to his brother James, Duke of York and
Albany, who afterward became king as James II. The name of New
Netherland was therefore changed to New York, and the principal
towns were also named in his honor, New York and Albany. Little
else was changed in the colony. The Dutch were allowed to live very
nearly as they had lived before, and soon became even happier and
more contented than they had been under Dutch rule. Many English
settlers now came in. The colony became rich and prosperous, but
the people had little to do with their own government.</p>
<p class="side">Origin of New Jersey, 1664.<br/>
Settlement of New Jersey.</p>
<p><b>71. New Jersey.</b>--No sooner had James received New
Netherland from his brother than he hastened to give some of the
best portions of it to two faithful friends, Sir George Carteret
and Lord Berkeley. Their territory extended from New York harbor to
the Delaware River, and was named New Jersey in honor of Carteret's
defense of the island of Jersey against the Puritans. Colonists at
once began coming to the new province and settled at
Elizabethtown.</p>
<p class="side">East and West Jersey.<br/>
Prosperity.</p>
<p><b>72. Later New Jersey.</b>--Soon New Jersey was divided into
two parts, East Jersey and West Jersey. West Jersey belonged to
Lord Berkeley and he sold it to the Quakers. Not very many years
later the Quakers also bought East Jersey. The New Jersey colonists
were always getting into disputes with one another, so they asked
Queen Anne to take charge of the government of the province. This
she did by telling the governor of New York to govern New Jersey
also. This was not what the Jersey people had expected. But they
had their own legislature. In time also they secured a governor all
to themselves and became a royal province entirely separate from
New York. Pennsylvania and New York protected the Jersey people
from the French and the Indians, and provided markets for the
products of the Jersey farms. The colonists were industrious and
their soil was fertile. They were very religious and paid great
attention to education. New Jersey became very prosperous and so
continued until the Revolution.</p>
<p class="side">Founding of Carolina, 1663. <i>Higginson</i>,
124-127.</p>
<p><b>73. The Founding of Carolina.</b>--The planting of New Jersey
was not the only colonial venture of Carteret and Berkeley. With
Lord Chancellor Clarendon and other noblemen they obtained from
Charles land in southern Virginia extending southward into Spanish
Florida. This great territory was named Carolina.</p>
<p class="side">Northern Carolina.<br/>
Southern Carolina.</p>
<p><b>74. The Carolina Colonists.</b>--In 1663, when the Carolina
charter was granted, there were a few settlers living in the
northern part of the colony. Other colonists came from outside
mainly from the Barbadoes and settled on the Cape Fear River. In
this way was formed a colony in northern Carolina. But the most
important settlement was in the southern part of the province at
Charleston. Southern Carolina at once became prosperous. This was
due to the fact that the soil and climate of that region were well
suited to the cultivation of rice. The rice swamps brought riches
to the planters, they also compelled the employment of large
numbers of negro slaves. Before long, indeed, there were more
negroes than whites in southern Carolina. In this way there grew up
two distinct centers of colonial life in the province.</p>
<p>[Illustration: Southern Carolina.]</p>
<p class="side">Indian war.<br/>
Bacon's Rebellion, 1676.</p>
<p><b>75. Bacon's Rebellion, 1676.</b>--By this time the Virginians
had become very discontented. There had been no election to the
colonial assembly since 1660 and Governor Berkeley was very
tyrannical. The Virginians also wanted more churches and more
schools. To add to these causes of discontent the Indians now
attacked the settlers, and Berkeley seemed to take very little
interest in protecting the Virginians. Led by Nathaniel Bacon the
colonists marched to Jamestown and demanded authority to go against
the Indians. Berkeley gave Bacon a commission. But, as soon as
Bacon left Jamestown on his expedition, Berkeley declared that he
was a rebel. Bacon returned, and Berkeley fled. Bacon marched
against the Indians again, and Berkeley came back, and so the
rebellion went on until Bacon died. Berkeley then captured the
other leaders one after another and hanged them. But when he
returned to England, Charles II turned his back to him, saying,
"The old fool has killed more men in Virginia than I for the murder
of my father."</p>
<p>[Illustration: THE HOUSE IN WHICH NATHANIEL BACON DIED. From an
original sketch.]</p>
<p class="side">Greedy Governors.<br/>
Founding of William and Mary College, 1691.</p>
<p><b>76. Virginia after Bacon's Rebellion.</b>--The Virginians
were now handed over to a set of greedy governors. Some of them
came to America to make their fortunes. But some of them were
governors whom the people of other colonies would not have. The
only event of importance in the history of the colony during the
next twenty-five years was the founding of William and Mary College
(1691) at Williamsburg. It was the second oldest college in the
English colonies.</p>
<p>[Illustration: THE OPENING LINES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CHARTER
SHOWING ORNAMENTAL BORDER AND PORTRAIT OF CHARLES II.]</p>
<p class="side">King Philip's War, 1675-76. <i>Higginson</i>,
137-138; <i>Eggleston</i>, 81-89.</p>
<p><b>77. King Philip's War, 1675-76.</b>--It was not only in
Virginia and Maryland that the Indians were restless at this time.
In New England also they attacked the whites. They were led by
Massasoit's son, King Philip, an able and far-seeing man. He saw
with dismay how rapidly the whites were driving the Indians away
from their hunting-grounds. The Indians burned the English villages
on the frontier and killed hundreds of the settlers. The strongest
chief to join Philip was Canonchet of the Narragansetts. The
colonial soldiers stormed his fort and killed a thousand Indian
warriors. Before long King Philip himself was killed, and the war
slowly came to an end.</p>
<p class="side">William Penn.<br/>
The Pennsylvania Charter, 1681.</p>
<p><b>78. William Penn.</b>--Among the greatest Englishmen of that
time was William Penn. He was a Quaker and was also a friend of
Charles II and James, Duke of York. He wished to found a colony in
which he and the Quakers could work out their ideas in religious
and civil matters. It chanced that Charles owed Penn a large sum of
money. As Charles seldom had any money, he was very glad to give
Penn instead a large tract of land in America. In this way Penn
obtained Pennsylvania. James, for his part, gave him Delaware.</p>
<p class="side">Settlement of Pennsylvania, 1682. <i>Higginson</i>,
101-105; <i>Eggleston</i>, 57-60; <i>Source-Book</i>, 67-69.</p>
<p><b>79. Founding of Pennsylvania, 1682.</b>--William Penn had a
great reputation for honesty and fair dealing among the English
Quakers and among the Quakers on the continent of Europe as well.
As soon as it was known that he was to found a colony, great
numbers of persons came to Pennsylvania from England and from
Germany. In a very short time the colony became strong and
prosperous. In the first place, the soil of Pennsylvania was rich
and productive while its climate was well suited to the growth of
grain. In the second place, Penn was very liberal to his colonists.
He gave them a large share in the government of the province and he
allowed no religious persecution. He also insisted on fair and
honest dealing with the Indians.</p>
<p class="side">Mason and Dixon's line.<br/>
Its importance in history.</p>
<p><b>80. Mason and Dixon's Line.</b>--In the seventeenth century
the geography of America was very little understood in Europe--and
the persons who drew up colonial charters understood it least of
all. Charter lines frequently overlapped and were often very
indistinct. This was particularly true of the Maryland and
Pennsylvania boundaries. Penn and Baltimore tried to come to an
agreement; but they never could agree. Years afterward, when they
were both dead, their heirs agreed to have a line drawn without
much regard to the charters. This line was finally surveyed by two
English engineers, Mason and Dixon, and is always called after
their names. It is the present boundary line between Pennsylvania
and Maryland. In colonial days it separated the colonies where
slavery was the rule from those where labor was generally free. In
the first half of the nineteenth century it separated the free
states from the slave states. Mason and Dixon's line, therefore,
has been a famous line in the history of the United States.</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<hr style="width: 35%;">
<br/>
<br/>
<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_9"></SPAN>CHAPTER 9</h2>
<h3>COLONIAL DEVELOPMENT, 1688-1760</h3>
<p class="side">New policy of the Stuarts.<br/>
Reasons for the new policy.</p>
<p><b>81. The Stuart Tyranny.</b>--Instead of admiring the growth
of the colonies in strength and in liberty, Charles and James saw
it with dismay. The colonies were becoming too strong and too free.
They determined to reduce all the colonies to royal provinces, like
Virginia--with the exception of Pennsylvania which belonged to
their friend, William Penn. There was a good deal to be said in
favor of this plan, for the colonists were so jealous of each other
that they would not unite against the French or the Indians. If the
governments were all in the hands of the king, the whole strength
of the British colonies could be used against any enemy of
England.</p>
<p class="side">End of the Massachusetts Company, 1684.<br/>
Governor Andros of New England, 1688.</p>
<p><b>82. The Stuart Tyranny in New England.</b>--The Massachusetts
charter was now taken away, and Sir Edmund Andros was sent over to
govern the colony. He was ordered to make laws and to tax the
people without asking their consent. He did as he was ordered to
do. He set up the Church of England. He taxed the people. He even
took their lands from them, on the ground that the grants from the
old Massachusetts government were of no value. When one man pointed
to the magistrates' signatures to his grant, Andros told him that
their names were worth no more than a scratch with a bear's paw. He
also enforced the navigation laws and took possession of
Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Plymouth. At the same time he
was also governor of New Hampshire and of New York.</p>
<p>[Illustration: A PROCLAMATION OF 1690 FORBIDDING THE PRINTING OF
NEWSPAPERS WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE GOVERNMENT.]</p>
<p class="side">Flight of James II.<br/>
Rebellion against Andros, 1689.</p>
<p><b>83. The "Glorious Revolution" in America, 1689.</b>--By this
time Charles was dead, and James was King of England. The English
people did not like James any better than the New Englanders liked
Andros. In 1688 they rebelled and made William of Orange and his
wife Mary, James's eldest daughter, King and Queen of England. On
their part, the Massachusetts colonists seized Andros and his
followers and shut them up in prison (April 18, 1689). The people
of Connecticut and Rhode Island turned out Andros's agents and set
up their old governments. In New York also Andros's deputy governor
was expelled, and the people took control of affairs until the king
and queen should send out a governor. Indeed, all the colonies,
except Maryland, declared for William and Mary.</p>
<p class="side">Policy of William and Mary.<br/>
The Massachusetts Province charter, 1691.</p>
<p><b>84. The New Arrangements.</b>--For a year or two William was
very busy in Ireland and on the continent. At length he had time to
attend to colonial affairs. He appointed royal governors for both
Pennsylvania and Maryland. William Penn soon had his colony given
back to him; but the Baltimores had to wait many years before they
recovered Maryland. In New York there was a dreadful tragedy. For
the new governor, Slaughter, was persuaded to order the execution
of the leaders in the rising against Andros. Massachusetts did not
get her old charter back, but she got another charter. This
provided that the king should appoint the governor, but the people
should elect a House of Representatives. The most important result
of this new arrangement was a series of disputes between the king's
governor and the people's representatives. Maine and New Plymouth
were included in Massachusetts under the new charter. But New
Hampshire remained a royal province.</p>
<p class="side">Prosperity of the colonies, 1700-60.</p>
<p><b>85. The Colonies, 1700-60.</b>--During these years immigrants
thronged to America, and the colonies became constantly stronger.
Commerce everywhere developed, and many manufactures were
established. Throughout the colonies the people everywhere gained
power, and had it not been for the French and Indian wars they
would have been happy. Aside from these wars the most important
events of these years were the overthrow of the Carolina
proprietors and the founding of Georgia.</p>
<p>[Illustration: Carolina Rice Fields.]</p>
<p class="side">Bad government of the Carolina proprietors.<br/>
Rebellion in Carolina, 1719.<br/>
North and South Carolina.</p>
<p><b>86. North and South Carolina.</b>--The Carolina proprietors
and their colonists had never got on well together. They now got on
worse than ever. The greater part of the colonists were not members
of the Established Church; but the proprietors tried to take away
the right to vote from all persons who were not of that faith. They
also interfered in elections, and tried to prevent the formation of
a true representative assembly. They could not protect the people
against the pirates who blockaded Charleston for weeks at a time.
In 1719 the people of Charleston rebelled. The king then
interfered, and appointed a royal governor. Later he bought out the
rights of the proprietors. In this way Carolina became a royal
province. It was soon divided into two provinces, North Carolina
and South Carolina. But there had always been two separate colonies
in Carolina (p. 52).</p>
<p class="side">General Oglethorpe.<br/>
Grant of Georgia, 1732.</p>
<p><b>87. Founding of Georgia, 1732.</b>--In those days it was the
custom in England to send persons who could not pay their debts to
prison. Of course many of these poor debtors were really
industrious persons whom misfortune or sickness had driven into
debt. General Oglethorpe, a member of Parliament, looked into the
prison management. He was greatly affected by the sad fate of these
poor debtors, and determined to do something for them. With a
number of charitable persons he obtained a part of South Carolina
for a colony, and named it Georgia for George II, who gave the
land. Parliament also gave money. For the government thought it
very desirable to have a colony between the rich plantations of
Carolina and the Spanish settlements in Florida.</p>
<p class="side">Settlement of Georgia, 1733. <i>Higginson</i>,
127-130; <i>Eggleston</i>, 62-65; <i>Source-Book</i>, 71-73.<br/>
Progress of the colony.</p>
<p><b>88. Georgia, 1733-52.</b>--Naturally Oglethorpe had no
difficulty in getting colonists. For the poor debtors and other
oppressed persons were very glad to have a new start in life.
Savannah was founded in 1733. The Spaniards, however, were not at
all glad to have an English colony planted so near Florida. They
attacked the Georgians, and Oglethorpe spent years in fighting
them. The Georgia colonists found it very difficult to compete with
the Carolina planters. For the Carolinians had slaves to work for
them, and the proprietors of Georgia would not let the Georgians
own slaves. Finally they gave way and permitted the colonists to
own slaves. But this so disheartened the Georgia proprietors that
they gave up the enterprise and handed the colony over to the king.
In this way Georgia became a royal province.</p>
<br/>
<br/>
<hr style="width: 35%;">
<br/>
<br/>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />