<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0002" id="link2H_4_0002"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> II. The Schools of Tea. </h2>
<p>Tea is a work of art and needs a master hand to bring out its noblest
qualities. We have good and bad tea, as we have good and bad paintings—generally
the latter. There is no single recipe for making the perfect tea, as there
are no rules for producing a Titian or a Sesson. Each preparation of the
leaves has its individuality, its special affinity with water and heat,
its own method of telling a story. The truly beautiful must always be in
it. How much do we not suffer through the constant failure of society to
recognise this simple and fundamental law of art and life; Lichilai, a
Sung poet, has sadly remarked that there were three most deplorable things
in the world: the spoiling of fine youths through false education, the
degradation of fine art through vulgar admiration, and the utter waste of
fine tea through incompetent manipulation.</p>
<p>Like Art, Tea has its periods and its schools. Its evolution may be
roughly divided into three main stages: the Boiled Tea, the Whipped Tea,
and the Steeped Tea. We moderns belong to the last school. These several
methods of appreciating the beverage are indicative of the spirit of the
age in which they prevailed. For life is an expression, our unconscious
actions the constant betrayal of our innermost thought. Confucius said
that "man hideth not." Perhaps we reveal ourselves too much in small
things because we have so little of the great to conceal. The tiny
incidents of daily routine are as much a commentary of racial ideals as
the highest flight of philosophy or poetry. Even as the difference in
favorite vintage marks the separate idiosyncrasies of different periods
and nationalities of Europe, so the Tea-ideals characterise the various
moods of Oriental culture. The Cake-tea which was boiled, the Powdered-tea
which was whipped, the Leaf-tea which was steeped, mark the distinct
emotional impulses of the Tang, the Sung, and the Ming dynasties of China.
If we were inclined to borrow the much-abused terminology of
art-classification, we might designate them respectively, the Classic, the
Romantic, and the Naturalistic schools of Tea.</p>
<p>The tea-plant, a native of southern China, was known from very early times
to Chinese botany and medicine. It is alluded to in the classics under the
various names of Tou, Tseh, Chung, Kha, and Ming, and was highly prized
for possessing the virtues of relieving fatigue, delighting the soul,
strengthening the will, and repairing the eyesight. It was not only
administered as an internal dose, but often applied externally in form of
paste to alleviate rheumatic pains. The Taoists claimed it as an important
ingredient of the elixir of immortality. The Buddhists used it extensively
to prevent drowsiness during their long hours of meditation.</p>
<p>By the fourth and fifth centuries Tea became a favourite beverage among
the inhabitants of the Yangtse-Kiang valley. It was about this time that
modern ideograph Cha was coined, evidently a corruption of the classic
Tou. The poets of the southern dynasties have left some fragments of their
fervent adoration of the "froth of the liquid jade." Then emperors used to
bestow some rare preparation of the leaves on their high ministers as a
reward for eminent services. Yet the method of drinking tea at this stage
was primitive in the extreme. The leaves were steamed, crushed in a
mortar, made into a cake, and boiled together with rice, ginger, salt,
orange peel, spices, milk, and sometimes with onions! The custom obtains
at the present day among the Thibetans and various Mongolian tribes, who
make a curious syrup of these ingredients. The use of lemon slices by the
Russians, who learned to take tea from the Chinese caravansaries, points
to the survival of the ancient method.</p>
<p>It needed the genius of the Tang dynasty to emancipate Tea from its crude
state and lead to its final idealization. With Luwuh in the middle of the
eighth century we have our first apostle of tea. He was born in an age
when Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism were seeking mutual synthesis. The
pantheistic symbolism of the time was urging one to mirror the Universal
in the Particular. Luwuh, a poet, saw in the Tea-service the same harmony
and order which reigned through all things. In his celebrated work, the
"Chaking" (The Holy Scripture of Tea) he formulated the Code of Tea. He
has since been worshipped as the tutelary god of the Chinese tea
merchants.</p>
<p>The "Chaking" consists of three volumes and ten chapters. In the first
chapter Luwuh treats of the nature of the tea-plant, in the second of the
implements for gathering the leaves, in the third of the selection of the
leaves. According to him the best quality of the leaves must have "creases
like the leathern boot of Tartar horsemen, curl like the dewlap of a
mighty bullock, unfold like a mist rising out of a ravine, gleam like a
lake touched by a zephyr, and be wet and soft like fine earth newly swept
by rain."</p>
<p>The fourth chapter is devoted to the enumeration and description of the
twenty-four members of the tea-equipage, beginning with the tripod brazier
and ending with the bamboo cabinet for containing all these utensils. Here
we notice Luwuh's predilection for Taoist symbolism. Also it is
interesting to observe in this connection the influence of tea on Chinese
ceramics. The Celestial porcelain, as is well known, had its origin in an
attempt to reproduce the exquisite shade of jade, resulting, in the Tang
dynasty, in the blue glaze of the south, and the white glaze of the north.
Luwuh considered the blue as the ideal colour for the tea-cup, as it lent
additional greenness to the beverage, whereas the white made it look
pinkish and distasteful. It was because he used cake-tea. Later on, when
the tea masters of Sung took to the powdered tea, they preferred heavy
bowls of blue-black and dark brown. The Mings, with their steeped tea,
rejoiced in light ware of white porcelain.</p>
<p>In the fifth chapter Luwuh describes the method of making tea. He
eliminates all ingredients except salt. He dwells also on the
much-discussed question of the choice of water and the degree of boiling
it. According to him, the mountain spring is the best, the river water and
the spring water come next in the order of excellence. There are three
stages of boiling: the first boil is when the little bubbles like the eye
of fishes swim on the surface; the second boil is when the bubbles are
like crystal beads rolling in a fountain; the third boil is when the
billows surge wildly in the kettle. The Cake-tea is roasted before the
fire until it becomes soft like a baby's arm and is shredded into powder
between pieces of fine paper. Salt is put in the first boil, the tea in
the second. At the third boil, a dipperful of cold water is poured into
the kettle to settle the tea and revive the "youth of the water." Then the
beverage was poured into cups and drunk. O nectar! The filmy leaflet hung
like scaly clouds in a serene sky or floated like waterlilies on emerald
streams. It was of such a beverage that Lotung, a Tang poet, wrote: "The
first cup moistens my lips and throat, the second cup breaks my
loneliness, the third cup searches my barren entrail but to find therein
some five thousand volumes of odd ideographs. The fourth cup raises a
slight perspiration,—all the wrong of life passes away through my
pores. At the fifth cup I am purified; the sixth cup calls me to the
realms of the immortals. The seventh cup—ah, but I could take no
more! I only feel the breath of cool wind that rises in my sleeves. Where
is Horaisan? Let me ride on this sweet breeze and waft away thither."</p>
<p>The remaining chapters of the "Chaking" treat of the vulgarity of the
ordinary methods of tea-drinking, a historical summary of illustrious
tea-drinkers, the famous tea plantations of China, the possible variations
of the tea-service and illustrations of the tea-utensils. The last is
unfortunately lost.</p>
<p>The appearance of the "Chaking" must have created considerable sensation
at the time. Luwuh was befriended by the Emperor Taisung (763-779), and
his fame attracted many followers. Some exquisites were said to have been
able to detect the tea made by Luwuh from that of his disciples. One
mandarin has his name immortalised by his failure to appreciate the tea of
this great master.</p>
<p>In the Sung dynasty the whipped tea came into fashion and created the
second school of Tea. The leaves were ground to fine powder in a small
stone mill, and the preparation was whipped in hot water by a delicate
whisk made of split bamboo. The new process led to some change in the
tea-equipage of Luwuh, as well as in the choice of leaves. Salt was
discarded forever. The enthusiasm of the Sung people for tea knew no
bounds. Epicures vied with each other in discovering new varieties, and
regular tournaments were held to decide their superiority. The Emperor
Kiasung (1101-1124), who was too great an artist to be a well-behaved
monarch, lavished his treasures on the attainment of rare species. He
himself wrote a dissertation on the twenty kinds of tea, among which he
prizes the "white tea" as of the rarest and finest quality.</p>
<p>The tea-ideal of the Sungs differed from the Tangs even as their notion of
life differed. They sought to actualize what their predecessors tried to
symbolise. To the Neo-Confucian mind the cosmic law was not reflected in
the phenomenal world, but the phenomenal world was the cosmic law itself.
Aeons were but moments—Nirvana always within grasp. The Taoist
conception that immortality lay in the eternal change permeated all their
modes of thought. It was the process, not the deed, which was interesting.
It was the completing, not the completion, which was really vital. Man
came thus at once face to face with nature. A new meaning grew into the
art of life. The tea began to be not a poetical pastime, but one of the
methods of self-realisation. Wangyucheng eulogised tea as "flooding his
soul like a direct appeal, that its delicate bitterness reminded him of
the aftertaste of a good counsel." Sotumpa wrote of the strength of the
immaculate purity in tea which defied corruption as a truly virtuous man.
Among the Buddhists, the southern Zen sect, which incorporated so much of
Taoist doctrines, formulated an elaborate ritual of tea. The monks
gathered before the image of Bodhi Dharma and drank tea out of a single
bowl with the profound formality of a holy sacrament. It was this Zen
ritual which finally developed into the Tea-ceremony of Japan in the
fifteenth century.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the sudden outburst of the Mongol tribes in the thirteenth
century which resulted in the devastation and conquest of China under the
barbaric rule of the Yuen Emperors, destroyed all the fruits of Sung
culture. The native dynasty of the Mings which attempted
re-nationalisation in the middle of the fifteenth century was harassed by
internal troubles, and China again fell under the alien rule of the
Manchus in the seventeenth century. Manners and customs changed to leave
no vestige of the former times. The powdered tea is entirely forgotten. We
find a Ming commentator at loss to recall the shape of the tea whisk
mentioned in one of the Sung classics. Tea is now taken by steeping the
leaves in hot water in a bowl or cup. The reason why the Western world is
innocent of the older method of drinking tea is explained by the fact that
Europe knew it only at the close of the Ming dynasty.</p>
<p>To the latter-day Chinese tea is a delicious beverage, but not an ideal.
The long woes of his country have robbed him of the zest for the meaning
of life. He has become modern, that is to say, old and disenchanted. He
has lost that sublime faith in illusions which constitutes the eternal
youth and vigour of the poets and ancients. He is an eclectic and politely
accepts the traditions of the universe. He toys with Nature, but does not
condescend to conquer or worship her. His Leaf-tea is often wonderful with
its flower-like aroma, but the romance of the Tang and Sung ceremonials
are not to be found in his cup.</p>
<p>Japan, which followed closely on the footsteps of Chinese civilisation,
has known the tea in all its three stages. As early as the year 729 we
read of the Emperor Shomu giving tea to one hundred monks at his palace in
Nara. The leaves were probably imported by our ambassadors to the Tang
Court and prepared in the way then in fashion. In 801 the monk Saicho
brought back some seeds and planted them in Yeisan. Many tea-gardens are
heard of in succeeding centuries, as well as the delight of the
aristocracy and priesthood in the beverage. The Sung tea reached us in
1191 with the return of Yeisai-zenji, who went there to study the southern
Zen school. The new seeds which he carried home were successfully planted
in three places, one of which, the Uji district near Kioto, bears still
the name of producing the best tea in the world. The southern Zen spread
with marvelous rapidity, and with it the tea-ritual and the tea-ideal of
the Sung. By the fifteenth century, under the patronage of the Shogun,
Ashikaga-Voshinasa, the tea ceremony is fully constituted and made into an
independent and secular performance. Since then Teaism is fully
established in Japan. The use of the steeped tea of the later China is
comparatively recent among us, being only known since the middle of the
seventeenth century. It has replaced the powdered tea in ordinary
consumption, though the latter still continues to hold its place as the
tea of teas.</p>
<p>It is in the Japanese tea ceremony that we see the culmination of
tea-ideals. Our successful resistance of the Mongol invasion in 1281 had
enabled us to carry on the Sung movement so disastrously cut off in China
itself through the nomadic inroad. Tea with us became more than an
idealisation of the form of drinking; it is a religion of the art of life.
The beverage grew to be an excuse for the worship of purity and
refinement, a sacred function at which the host and guest joined to
produce for that occasion the utmost beatitude of the mundane. The
tea-room was an oasis in the dreary waste of existence where weary
travellers could meet to drink from the common spring of art-appreciation.
The ceremony was an improvised drama whose plot was woven about the tea,
the flowers, and the paintings. Not a colour to disturb the tone of the
room, not a sound to mar the rhythm of things, not a gesture to obtrude on
the harmony, not a word to break the unity of the surroundings, all
movements to be performed simply and naturally—such were the aims of
the tea-ceremony. And strangely enough it was often successful. A subtle
philosophy lay behind it all. Teaism was Taoism in disguise.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />