<h3> CHAPTER XI <br/><br/> WENDELL PHILLIPS—GOVERNOR ANDREW—PHILLIPS'S CONVERSION </h3>
<p>There was one clear reason for the deadly
hatred of the pro-slavery faction in Boston
to Phillips. He was the real leader of the
Anti-Slavery Party. If he could be silenced, the voices
of the rest mattered little. During twenty years
Garrison's influence had been declining, and
Phillips had come steadily to the front. For the last
ten years he had stood alone. It was his voice
which rang through the land. His were the
counsels which governed the Abolitionist band.
His speeches were something more than eloquent;
they were full of knowledge, of hard thinking; and
the rhetorical splendour only lighted up a closely
reasoned argument. What Emerson said of
speeches and writings in general was absolutely
true of Phillips's oratory; the effect of it was
mathematically measurable by the depth of
thought. He spoke all over the North. The
Conservatives had no match for him; therefore
he was to be put down by other means.</p>
<p>Passions ran, I think, higher in Boston during
those winter months of 1860-1, and the early
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P105"></SPAN>105}</span>
spring, than before or since. Thanks to the
pro-slavery faction on one side and the Abolitionists
on the other, Massachusetts was within measurable
distance of civil war within her own borders. After
Fort Sumter and Baltimore, these passions found
an outlet elsewhere. For a time, the two Northern
factions merged into one people. But during all
the years that have passed since I have known
nothing quite like the state of feeling which
prevailed that winter. The solid men of Boston
thought they saw the fabric of society dissolving
and their business and wealth and authority
perishing with it. The solid world was to exist no
more. Naturally, they fought for their lives and
all the rest of it, and fought hard. Their hatreds
were savage. Their methods were savage. We
seemed to be getting back to the primitive days
when men stood face to face, and the issue of battle
became a personal combat. The Lawrences and
their friends were generally a little stout for the
business of battle, but the allies whom they brought
with them to Tremont Temple and the Music
Hall and the streets were good fighting material.
During all this time the Abolitionists were, as they
had been, a minority and on the defensive.</p>
<p>But this was the state of things which Governor
Andrew had in mind when he challenged Phillips
to show him the statute. He did not want to
make the State of Massachusetts a party to this
conflict within itself. If to keep order in the
streets or to keep a platform open to Phillips he
were obliged to move, he meant to have the law
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P106"></SPAN>106}</span>
with him. No refinements, no Judge-made law, no
generalizations—for the common law after an
Atlantic voyage and a hundred years' sleep is
nothing—but a statute, printed, legible,
peremptory, binding alike upon Governor and citizens.
There was no such statute. If anybody had
happened to think of it, no doubt there would have
been, but there was not.</p>
<p>Therefore the Governor sat still. He was of
such a bulk that it seemed as if, while he sat still,
nothing could move. He was, in size and build,
not wholly unlike Gambetta, though he had two
eyes, both blue, as against the one black, fiery orb
of the Genoese; and curling light brown hair instead
of the black lion's mane which floated to Gambetta's
shoulders; and a face in which sweetness
counted for as much as strength. Like Gambetta,
he was well served by those about him. He knew
accurately what was going on, and all that was
going on. He told me afterward he did not know
on what information we acted, but he was
astonished we knew so much about what the enemy
intended. When I reminded him that my
associations were mostly with the other side, he
reflected a moment and said: "Yes, that explains a
good deal." I did not think it necessary to add
that, after Tremont Temple, we were on good
terms with the police also; since Phillips's appeal
to Andrew had been based on the alliance between
the police and the Lawrence mob; an alliance which
had in truth existed, at that time.</p>
<p>But the winter wore on. Twice after the
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P107"></SPAN>107}</span>
discourse on Mobs and Education, Phillips spoke in
the Music Hall—January 20th, 1861, on Disunion,
and February 17th, on Progress. Both times the
mob supplied part of his audience inside and part
of his escort outside. No violence was attempted.
The police were too strong, and the example of
Deputy Chief Ham had proved they were in
earnest. If there was any violence, it was in
Phillips's speeches and language. He was never
more provocative. His forecast of the situation
was influenced by his wishes and theories. All
his life he had been preaching disunion as the one
remedy for the slave. Disunion seemed now at
last within reach, and at all costs he would do
what he could to promote it. Indeed, he thought
it already accomplished. Within six weeks after
Lincoln's election South Carolina had replied by
an ordinance of secession. Mississippi, Alabama,
Georgia had followed, and all over the South
United States forts and arsenals had been seized
by State troops. What was Phillips's comment?</p>
<p>"The Lord reigneth; let the earth rejoice. The
covenant with death is annulled; the agreement
with hell is broken in pieces. The chain which
has held the slave system since 1787 is parted."</p>
<p>He pronounced a eulogy on the Southern State
which had led the way:</p>
<p>"South Carolina, bankrupt, alone, with a hundred
thousand more slaves than whites, four blacks
to three whites within her borders, flings her
gauntlet at the feet of twenty-four millions of
people—in defence of an idea."</p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P108"></SPAN>108}</span></p>
<p>A month later he was in the same mood. It was
a trait of Phillips—not a good one—that he
attacked most mercilessly the men who hated slavery
as much as he did, but could not go as far as he
did. In this February speech there is a long
lampoon on Dana; counsel for the slave in all the
fugitive slave cases, but never denying—what
lawyer ever did deny?—that there was a constitutional
obligation to return fugitives. It is human
nature, but not the best side of it.</p>
<p>Such a reproach came ill from a man who denounced
the Constitution as a covenant with death
because of the compromises with slavery imbedded
in the great instrument of 1787. Of these
compromises the rendition of fugitive slaves was one.
Phillips himself could not deny it. The difference
between him and Dana was that Dana would bow
to the law and Phillips would not. Dana would
do what he could by legal means to rescue the
fugitive. He defended him in the courts.
Phillips would have defended him in the streets. Both
men were needful to the time. The Abolitionists
were very far from disdaining the use of legal
weapons. When Theodore Parker had been
indicted and the Court, at the instance of his
counsel, quashed the indictment on purely technical
grounds, Parker exulted. "It is a triumph for the
right. We have broken their sword."</p>
<p>There came, however, the moment when Phillips
had to cast in his lot, for good or evil, with either
North or South. He hesitated long. He thought
and thought. He talked with his friends, with the
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P109"></SPAN>109}</span>
man in the street, with the men who had lately
mobbed him. One morning he came into my
office. His sunny face was clouded. He looked
anxious, almost ill. He had to make the most
momentous decision of his life; and he could not
yet make up his mind. He said:</p>
<p>"I came to talk to you because I know you are
against me. What I have said to you before makes
no impression. You still think I ought to renounce
my past, thirty years of it, belie my pledges,
disown every profession of faith, bless those whom I
have cursed, start afresh with a new set of political
principles, and admit my life has been a mistake."</p>
<p>"Certainly not the last," I said, "and as for
the others, are you not taking a rhetorical view,
a platform view? But I will go further. I don't
think it matters much what you sacrifice—consistency,
principles, or anything. They belong to
the past. They have nothing to do with to-day.
The war is upon us. You must either support it or
oppose it. If you oppose it, you fling away your
position and all your influence. You will never
be listened to again."</p>
<p>And so on. He sat silent, unmoved. Nothing
I could say, nothing anybody could say, would
move him. All his life long he had thought for
himself; in a minority of one. It had to be so
now. We talked on. Finally, I said: "I will tell
you what I once heard a negro say: 'When my
massa and somebody else quarrel I'm on the
somebody else's side.' Don't you think the negro
knows? Do you really doubt that a war between
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P110"></SPAN>110}</span>
the Slave Power and the North, be the result what
it may, must end in Freedom?" I am not sure
that I ever did hear a negro say that, but I hoped
that Phillips would open his mind to the negro if
not to me. And I think he did. I trust this little
artifice of debate was not very wrong. I had to
urge what I could, but I knew Phillips would
decide for himself. He left saying, "I will see you
again to-night." I went to his house. When I
opened the door of the parlour, there lay Phillips
on the sofa, asleep. Ten minutes later he awoke;
lay silent for another minute, then said:</p>
<p>"We shall not have to discuss these things any
more. I am going to speak next Sunday at the
Music Hall for the War and the Union."</p>
<p>And he began at once to consider how he should
announce his conversion. Having gone over, he
took his whole heart with him. No compromise,
no transition, not one word to retract, not a hint
of apology or explanation. Yesterday an Abolitionist
to whom the Constitution was a covenant
with death and an agreement with hell. To-day
a soldier for the Union. Presently he said:</p>
<p>"It will be the most important speech of my life.
I don't often write, as you know, but I shall write
this and will read it to you when it is finished."</p>
<p>Two days later he sent for me again and these
were the first sentences I heard:</p>
<p>"Many times this winter, here and elsewhere,
I have counselled peace—urged as well as I knew
how the expediency of acknowledging a Southern
Confederacy and the peaceful separation of these
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P111"></SPAN>111}</span>
thirty-four States. One of the journals announces
to you that I come here this morning to retract
those opinions. No not one of them."</p>
<p>I said: "Mr. Phillips, you will never get
beyond that. They will not listen."</p>
<p>"Then they will be the last sentences I shall ever
utter in public. But do you listen."</p>
<p>And he went on, in his finest platform manner
and voice:</p>
<p>"No, not one of them. I need them all; every
word I have spoken this winter; every act of
twenty-five years of my life, to make the welcome
I give this War hearty and hot."</p>
<p>He knew what he was about. When it became
known he was to speak for the Union, Charles
Pollen came to me and asked whether I thought
Phillips would like the Music Hall platform hung
with the American flag. "Yes," said Phillips,
"deck the altar for the victim." And decked it
was—a forest of flags; and the flags told the story,
long before Phillips opened his mouth. There was
not a note of remonstrance as he announced his
refusal to retract. And again he went on:</p>
<p>"Civil war is a momentous evil. It needs the
soundest, most solemn justification. I rejoice
before God to-day for every word I have spoken
counselling peace, but I rejoice also, and still more
deeply, that now, for the first time in my
Anti-Slavery life, I speak beneath the Stars and Stripes,
and welcome the tread of Massachusetts men
marshalled for war."</p>
<p>I never saw such a scene. The audience sprang
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P112"></SPAN>112}</span>
up and cheered and cheered and cheered. The
hall was a furnace seven times heated. The only
unmoved man was Phillips. He waited and once
more went on:</p>
<p>"No matter what the past has been or said,
to-day the slave asks God for a sight of this banner
and counts it the pledge of his redemption.
Hitherto it may have meant what you thought or what
I thought: to-day it represents sovereignty and
justice. Massachusetts has been sleeping on her
arms since '83. The first cannon shot brings her
to her feet with the war-cry of the Revolution on
her lips."</p>
<p>And so on to the end. It was a nobler speech
even than in the printed report, for that came from
his manuscript and often he put his manuscript
aside and let himself go. The inspiration of the
moment was more than any written words. When
it was over there was again a mob outside; a mob
that would have carried the orator shoulder-high
to Essex Street. The honest, strong face of the
Deputy Chief of Police wore a broad smile. He
had done his duty. His responsibilities were
ended. He, too, had fought his fight. Phillips
took it all coolly. It was such a triumph as comes
to a man once in his career, and once only—the
finest hour in Phillips's life. He never reached a
greater height of oratory, nor an equal height of
devotion. For his triumph was over himself.</p>
<p><br/><br/><br/></p>
<p><SPAN id="chap12"></SPAN></p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P113"></SPAN>113}</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />