<h3> CHAPTER XXVII <br/><br/> "CIVIL WAR?"—INCIDENTS IN THE 'EIGHTIES—SIR<br/> GEORGE TREVELYAN—LORD BARRYMORE<br/> </h3>
<p>The streets of London were red one day in
November, 1909, with placards proclaiming:</p>
<p>"The Lords declare Civil War!"</p>
<p>I suppose the Radicals thought it paid to force
the note. Mr. Winston Churchill was their
bandmaster for the moment. There is no more
effective political rhetorician, provided you accept
that fallacy about the folly of the people against
which the warning of Mr. Lincoln passes unheeded.</p>
<p>But there was, at least on one side, a state of
feeling in the country comparable to nothing I
can remember except the feeling which prevailed
during the Home Rule crisis, and far stronger now
than then. In that crisis also the Lords came to
the rescue of the Kingdom, which they saved from
disintegration and ruin. Ruin for the moment it
would have been; only to be finally averted by
the reconquest of Ireland. Even to the spectator
those were stirring days. England and Ireland
from 1881 onward had become the Wild West.
The revolver was the real safeguard of personal
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P254"></SPAN>254}</span>
liberty. I don't think it will be quite like that
now, but it does seem as if the bitterness of
contention and the personalities of politics would go
further now than then; perhaps have already gone
further.</p>
<p>I was in Ireland for a fortnight during one of
the worst periods, but there were times when
London was as disturbed and distressful as Ireland
itself. Those were years of dynamite in England,
when, as Lord Randolph Churchill said, the railway
stations were flying about our ears, and when
London Bridge came near being blown up, and
when Englishmen in high place were targets.
From the Prime Minister down to his youngest
colleague, no man was safe without a guard of
detectives; and not then. Mr. Gladstone, whose
courage was high, shook off his escort whenever
he could. Other Ministers paid more respect to
a very real danger. Sir George Trevelyan, who
was appointed Chief Secretary for Ireland in 1882,
submitted sensibly to the precautions the Home
Office and Scotland Yard thought needful. One
afternoon I met Trevelyan in a Bond Street shop.
We left the shop together. Two quite
innocent-looking men were outside the door. "I hope you
don't mind," said Trevelyan. "I am obliged to
let them follow me." They were Scotland Yard
detectives. As we walked down the street they
were within earshot all the way, their vigilance
unrelaxing. Whether they thought their ward
in greater or less danger because I was with him
I cannot say. We parted at the corner of Piccadilly.
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P255"></SPAN>255}</span>
In both streets the throng on the sidewalk
was dense, but through it these men made
their way without violence, without haste, but
never for an instant allowing themselves to be
separated from the Chief Secretary by so much
as an arm's length. He walked in peril not only
real but imminent. Two days before his appointment
as Chief Secretary his predecessor, Lord
Frederick Cavendish, and Mr. Burke, permanent
Under Secretary, had been murdered. To accept
that inheritance of probable assassination was
a gallant act, quite characteristic of Sir George
Trevelyan. But I do not imagine that he or his
friends ever while he held that office forgot what
had happened in Phoenix Park.</p>
<p>Not many evenings later I met Sir George
Trevelyan at dinner. If he had not been famous
as a writer and Member of Parliament and Irish
Secretary and much else, he might well have been
famous as a diner-out. He had the art of conversation.
His uncle's influence had left him, in this
respect, untouched. Where Macaulay discoursed
and reeled off dreary pages of encyclopædic
knowledge, Trevelyan talked lightly and well; claiming
no monopoly, preaching no sermon, wearying no
company too well bred to show itself bored. He
had a felicity of allusion which was so wholly free
from pedantry as to seem almost accidental.
His voice, like Browning's, was strident and his
laugh sometimes boisterous; but this was in
moments of excitement.</p>
<p>On this particular evening there was something
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P256"></SPAN>256}</span>
besides his inspiriting talk which drew the
attention of the company. So long as the ladies were
at table he talked with his wonted energy. When
the dining-room door had closed on the last of
these departing angels Trevelyan sank into his
chair with a sigh, drew a revolver from the breast
pocket of his coat, laid it on the table and said to
his host:</p>
<p>"Pray forgive me, but if you knew how tired I
am of carrying this thing about!"</p>
<p>On Sir George Trevelyan as on others the Irish
Secretaryship left its mark. A year of office aged
him as if it were ten. He came out worn and
grey: not yet forty-five years old. The tragedy
was in one particular a tragi-comedy. Half his
moustache had turned white; the other half black
as before. And I suppose it shook his nerve more
or less and was perhaps responsible for that
fickleness of purpose or of view which led him first to
oppose and then to adopt Mr. Gladstone's policy
of Home Rule.</p>
<p>I saw one side of the Irish question during a
visit to Lord Barrymore, then Mr. Smith-Barry,
and his beautiful American wife, at Fota Island,
near Queenstown. Mr. William O'Brien had
launched shortly before this his New Tipperary
scheme, of which one main object was to ruin
Mr. Smith-Barry who owned the old Tipperary.
Assassination was then only a political incident or
instrument. Mr. Smith-Barry, moreover, was
hated not only as a landowner but for having
organized the one efficient defence against the
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P257"></SPAN>257}</span>
spoliation of the landlords which down to that
time had been discovered. He had formed a
company and raised a large sum of money among
his English friends, he himself being the largest
contributor. So he held the O'Brien cohorts at
bay; at what money cost and at what personal
risk few men knew. But I apprehend that but for
Mr. Smith-Barry the Plan of Campaign and New
Tipperary would have succeeded and the South of
Ireland been handed over to the Land League.</p>
<p>One night as I was on my way from my room
to the drawing-room, on the other side of the hall,
I saw by the front door a big man in a blue cavalry
cloak and cap, who had just entered. He was
laying aside his cloak as I passed, and took
out of their holsters first one and then another
navy revolver, both seven-shooters. I said, too
flippantly:</p>
<p>"You take good care of yourself."</p>
<p>He turned on me sharply, with a questioning
look of keen eyes under heavy eyebrows:</p>
<p>"Are you a friend of Smith-Barry?"</p>
<p>"I should hardly be staying in his house if I
were not."</p>
<p>"Then I will tell you how you can best prove
your friendship. Get him to carry what I carry."</p>
<p>"Is he in danger?"</p>
<p>"Danger? There's a detective at this moment
behind every tree about the house, and even so
we don't know what may happen. We hope he is
safe here at home, but he goes about unarmed,
and it is known he is unarmed, and no man who
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P258"></SPAN>258}</span>
does that can be sure of his life. We have tried
our best to make him take care of himself. He
will not. Now do you try."</p>
<p>This sudden outburst, this appeal, this flash of
light upon the scene were all impressive. The
big man, it turned out, was the Chief Constable
of the county. He knew whereof he spoke. I
promised to do what I could and I talked with
Mr. Smith-Barry.</p>
<p>He was a man equally remarkable for courage
and for coolness, but in matters affecting his
personal safety he did not use the judgment for which
in other matters he was distinguished. He could
not be persuaded that anybody would think it
worth while to kill him. He knew well enough
that the shooting of landlords had become a
popular pastime, but he could not, or would not,
understand why he himself should be shot.</p>
<p>"I am on good terms with my tenants; my
rents are fair rents; I evict nobody. What have
they to gain by shooting me?"</p>
<p>But it was not from his own tenants that trouble
was expected. It was not because Mr. Smith-Barry
was not a good landlord, but because he was
the leader of the landlords in the South of Ireland,
and the most formidable opponent of the League
that his life was threatened. "It may be so,"
he said: "but I think I will go on as I am." And
from that nobody could move him.</p>
<p>Now, as it happened, shortly before I left
London I had met one of the chief officials in the
Home Office who said to me:</p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P259"></SPAN>259}</span></p>
<p>"You are going to Ireland."</p>
<p>"Yes, but how do you know?"</p>
<p>"Never mind how I know. What I want to say
to you is, Take a revolver with you."</p>
<p>I was on the point of making a light answer,
but stopped. If you get a hint of that kind from
a man who rules over the Criminal Department of
the Home Office and the police generally, you
accept it and do as you are told. I had a revolver
with me, therefore, and when the time came to go
back to London I left it in its case on Mr. Smith-Barry's
writing-table, with a letter asking him to
accept it from me and once more begging him to
carry it if only that it might be known that he
carried it, or if only out of his friendship to me.
This prevailed. He wrote me that he still thought
we made a needless fuss about it, but he could not
refuse the gift and he could not refuse to carry it.
No letter ever pleased me more. I have never
again seen my friend the Chief Constable, but I
have never forgotten him, and I think of him
now as a fine impersonation of that authority of
the law which, in those turbulent days, he asserted
and successfully maintained against great odds.</p>
<p><br/><br/><br/></p>
<p><SPAN id="chap28"></SPAN></p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P260"></SPAN>260}</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />