<h3> CHAPTER XXX <br/><br/> TWO GOVERNORS-GENERAL—LORD MINTO AND LORD GREY </h3>
<p>Lord Minto has now passed from the great
post of Governor-General of the Dominion
to the still greater Viceroyalty of India. But I
apprehend it will be long before his reign in Canada
is forgotten. Possibly the Canadians might not
use, and may not like, the word reign. They are
a susceptible as well as a great people. They are
jealous of their liberties, which are in no danger,
and of the word American, to which they have
some claim, over-shadowed though it be by their
greater neighbour on the South. I have seen
more instances than one of Canadian sensitiveness,
of which I will take the simplest. Having
to pay for a purchase in an Ottawa shop I asked
the shopkeeper whether he would take an American
banknote. He answered with a flushed face:</p>
<p>"We consider our money as much American as
yours. We have the same right as you to the
name American."</p>
<p>"By all means. But what do you call our
money?"</p>
<p>"United States bills."</p>
<p>"And what do you call me?"</p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P285"></SPAN>285}</span></p>
<p>But to that simple question he had no answer
ready. And I rather imagine the time has come,
or is coming, when the Canadian may be as proud
of the name which identifies him with the northern
half of the continent as we are of the adjective
we have to share, more or less, with others. I
never heard of a Mexican calling himself an
American, but I believe the Latin races to the South
do; and forget sometimes to put South before it.
Lord Minto was Governor-General while
Mr. Chamberlain was Colonial Secretary, a period of
transition, of Imperial transition, to which
Mr. Chamberlain led the way. Nobody has ever
forgotten his adjuration to all Englishmen to
think imperially. As I remember Canada during
several visits, she was at that time more inclined
to think independently. Not that any party
in the Dominion meditated a secession from the
Empire, but there was a pretty distinct notion,
and claim, of colonial autonomy. Canada came
first, as Canada, and not as a part of the Empire.
The moment when Imperial considerations first
became dominant in the Canadian mind was
moment of the Boer War.</p>
<p>There it is that Lord Minto's name becomes
indissolubly allied with the Dominion. His share
in that great transaction of the Canadian contingent
to South Africa has never, I think, been fully
understood by the British public. Nor would it
ever be if the matter were left to him. He was
never a man to advertise himself or his deeds.
I dare say he will not like my telling the story,
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P286"></SPAN>286}</span>
though I shall tell it only as it was told to me, and
the teller had nothing to do with Government
House.</p>
<p>It was for a while doubtful whether Canada
would send troops. There was, I am told, an
uncertain feeling about the militia organization,
then on a different footing from the present. There
were awkward stories of corruption and inefficiency.
It was doubted whether a force officered
and equipped in conditions then existing would
do credit to the Dominion. There were hesitations
on other grounds. But when finally a levy
was voted, Lord Minto, who had taken no part
in the discussion and could take none, availed
himself of his authority as Governor-General and
of his experience as a soldier, and gave his personal
attention to the organization of the contingent.
It was stated to me much more strongly than that,
and my informant seemed to doubt whether Lord
Minto did not exceed, or at least strain, his
prerogatives as representative of the Crown. If he
did, so much the better. The English have ever
liked a servant in high place who was not afraid of
responsibilities. But for my purpose it is enough
to say that Lord Minto took an active part in
these momentous preparations. I think no officer
was appointed without his sanction, no contract
for supplies entered into which he did not approve,
no arrangement of any kind made but upon his
initiative or with his express consent.</p>
<p>The result was that the Canadian forces reached
Africa a body of soldiers fit for the field,
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P287"></SPAN>287}</span>
not as a mere aggregation of men food for powder.
England knows, and all the world knows, what
service they did. There were no better troops
of the kind, perhaps not many of any kind better
adapted for the work they had to do and for coping
with such an enemy as the Boers. They did
more than their contract called for in the field.
They builded better than they knew. They made
it plain to all men that the country which had
sent such troops as these many thousands of miles
beyond the seas to the relief of the Imperial forces
of Great Britain was itself an integral and
indispensable part of the Empire.</p>
<p>Whereas, if they had failed or only half
succeeded, they would have done little good to the
British arms in South Africa and none at all to
the Imperialism of which Canada to-day is a
bulwark. And if this is a true account, as I believe
it to be, of the way in which these two great results
were brought about, the credit of them belongs
more to Lord Minto than to any other man.</p>
<p>I do not offer this as an explanation of the regard
in which Lord Minto was held. It could not be an
explanation, because it was not generally known.
There were other reasons, at the top of which I
should put his common sense, his sincerity, and,
of course, that devotion to duty which every
Governor-General is presumed to possess, which
in him was conspicuous. Everybody liked him,
nobody doubted him. He made the interests of
Canada his own. He traversed that vast territory
from end to end again and again. He held a
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P288"></SPAN>288}</span>
Court not in Ottawa only, but in Quebec, in
Halifax, in Toronto, and in that Far North where
Canada touches Alaska and the chief harvest of
the soil is gold. His five years' term came to an
end but the Colonial Office and Parliament House
and the people of Canada wished him to stay on,
and so the five years became six. A period on
which to look back with pride.</p>
<p>Canada is again fortunate in her Governor-General,
and in his relations with those who mould
public opinion on the American side of the border.
I imagine it may not be known in England how he
first conquered the respect and good-will of the
Americans. It was at a dinner of some five
hundred or six hundred people at the Waldorf Hotel
in New York. In the course of his short speech
Lord Grey referred, with a plainness unusual in
those exalted regions, to what had been said in
times past about the possible absorption of
Canada by the United States.</p>
<p>"But now," observed the Governor-General,
"there is no more reason for discussing the
annexation of Canada by the United States than for
discussing the annexation of the United States
by Canada."</p>
<p>It was a straight hit from the shoulder, but the
audience rose to it and cheered him as I had
heard no Englishman cheered in New York before
that time. He became in a moment a great figure,
filling the public eye. He delivered his tremendous
sentence with simplicity and good humour.
There was nothing like defiance or menace.
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P289"></SPAN>289}</span>
Everybody saw that he felt himself on a level
with his hearers. He spoke as Governor-General
of the Dominion to the people of the United States,
<i>d'égal à égal</i>. He spoke as an Englishman to
Americans. Mr. Price Collier may say, if he
chooses, that English and Americans do not like
each other, but I will ask him what other two
nationalities have the same, or anything like the
same, points of contact and of sympathy? There
stood Lord Grey, just an Englishman, holding out
his hand to his American cousins. If the hand
happened for that moment to be clenched it was
none the less a greeting, and was understood as
such. You could not look into his face without
seeing in it the spirit of kinship and of friendship.
Lord Grey is pre-eminently one of those men who
think the best relations between men or between
communities must spring from frankness. He
wanted to clear the ground, and he did clear it.
If he had asked anybody's advice he would
certainly have been advised not to say what he did.
He preferred to trust to his own instincts, and they
proved to be true instincts. The danger was that
a freedom of speech which would be accepted
from his lips might be resented when read in cold
print. But it was not.</p>
<p>No American will have forgotten Lord Grey's
gift of his portrait of Franklin to Philadelphia.
That endeared him to us still further. It was a
prize of war which he surrendered, taken in the
War of the Revolution by General Sir Charles
Grey. It used to hang near the ceiling in one of
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P290"></SPAN>290}</span>
the reception rooms of Howick House, Northumberland.
I saw it there some time before the gift
and Lord Grey told me its history, but did not tell
me he meant to give it back to America. I
believe he did ask whether I thought Philadelphia
would care to have it again, a question to which
I could not but say yes. Yet it might almost be
thought of the family, with a good deal more than
a hundred years of possession behind it. But in
this country a hundred years do not count so
much as elsewhere. The English have long since
got into the habit of reckoning by centuries.</p>
<p>When Lord Grey went to Washington the
President asked me to bring him to the White
House. Mrs. Roosevelt had a reception that
evening and I said with her permission I would
bring him then. "Very good," said the President,
"and mind you bring him to me as soon as
you come." I did as I was told. The President
greeted him, as he did everybody, warmly, but in
a way that made Lord Grey understand he was
welcome. Within thirty seconds they were deep
in political economy, a matter of which Lord Grey
had made a profounder study than the President.
For the Englishman had not, like Bacon and
Mr. Roosevelt, taken all knowledge to be his province,
and was able to master his subjects. More than
once I had occasion to see something of his familiarity
with difficult subjects—once at dinner when
the late Mr. Beit, the South African magnate, sat
on his right, and the two discussed financial and
political questions. Mr. Beit had made a great
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P291"></SPAN>291}</span>
fortune in South Africa, and Lord Grey had not.
The Chartered Company had not then proved a
mine of wealth to its administrator. But the
minds of the two were at one. The knowledge of
each was immense. The power of grappling with
great subjects was common to both. Perhaps
Lord Grey sometimes took an imaginative view,
but the feet of the capitalist were planted on the
solid earth.</p>
<p>The President and the Governor-General became
friends at once, neither of the two being the
kind of man to whom friendship requires length
of years to come into being. It is, of course, for
the interests of both Canada and the United
States that relations of sympathetic good-will
should exist between the rulers of each. A few
hours before their meeting the President knew
nothing about Lord Grey. Even to Mr. Roosevelt's
omniscience there are limits. But he desired
to know, and when he had heard a little of
Lord Grey's history, said joyfully: "All right;
we have subjects in common and ideas too." So
the doors of the White House opened wide to the
Governor-General, and Lord Grey was the President's
guest, and the impression in Canada was a
good impression.</p>
<p><br/><br/><br/></p>
<p><SPAN id="chap31"></SPAN></p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P292"></SPAN>292}</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />