<h3> CHAPTER XXXV <br/><br/> LORD GLENESK AND "THE MORNING POST" </h3>
<p>The owning or leasing of several houses is an
English habit which is no longer confined
to great landowners who have inherited their
possessions. Many men whose success in life
is their own adopt the custom. Among many
instances I will take one, for other reasons than
house-owning, the late Lord Glenesk, who had
at one time a lease of Invercauld, the fine place
belonging to the Farquharson family. There, as
later at Glenmuich, he liked to gather friends
about him and there was each year a succession
of parties. In the beginning Mr. Borthwick, he
became successively Sir Algernon Borthwick and
Lord Glenesk. His name and his wife's connect
themselves with many social memories in Scotland,
in London, where the house in Piccadilly was
long a brilliant centre, and in Cannes where they
occupied in winter the Chateau St. Michel at the
Californie end of the town in beautiful grounds
touching on the sea. They had also for some
years that square red brick house in Hampstead
on the edge of the heath, with a little land and a
brick wall about it, and there they entertained of
a Sunday during part of the season. Both had the
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P335"></SPAN>335}</span>
art of hospitality and the secret of social life,
by which I mean the secret of translating mere
hospitality into happiness for others.</p>
<p>Mr. Borthwick acquired <i>The Morning Post</i> in
1876. It was then a threepenny paper—six cents
on each of six days of the week. No Englishman
had ever then thought of a Sunday edition of a
daily paper; nor has since. There are Sunday
papers in London, of which one, <i>The Observer</i>, is a
supremely able journal, but they are published
one and all on Sundays only. When <i>The Morning
Post</i> passed into the hands of its late proprietor
the penny paper had already made its appearance,
though not the halfpenny. The future, it was
thought, belonged to the penny, but <i>The Morning
Post</i> like <i>The Times</i> was supposed to appeal to a
special class. It was the organ of the fashionable
world. You went to it for all that fashionable
intelligence now supplied, more or less completely
by all papers. It was the one newspaper which
lay on the table of every drawing-room in
Mayfair and Belgravia and in every country house
throughout the kingdom. Till Borthwick became
editor it was respectable, decorous, conventional,
and dull. It had little news except what came
to it through Reuter and other news agencies.
There were flashes of vivacity when young
Borthwick went to Paris, a city he understood, and
sent home sparkling letters which were the most
readable things in the paper and always seemed
a little out of place. It was an organ of
Conservatism, but the kind of Conservatism expounded
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P336"></SPAN>336}</span>
in its editorial columns was more orthodox than
inspiring. It had a moderate circulation and its
net yearly profits were not far from thirty
thousand dollars.</p>
<p>When Mr. Borthwick came into control of this
property—not at first, but not very long after—he
conceived the notion of turning it into a penny
paper. It was he who told me the story. He had
originality and he had courage but he was also
a man who sought advice in great enterprises
and he talked this scheme over with many men of
experience far greater than his own. He said to
me later:</p>
<p>"One and all they advised me against it. One
and all they thought it spelled ruin; or, if not ruin,
a great risk to a valuable though not great
property and the certainty of loss. They told me I
should inevitably forfeit the support of the classes
to whom <i>The Post</i> had always appealed and that I
should not gain new subscribers from other classes
in numbers sufficient to make good these losses.
I should lose not only readers but advertisers, for
the advertisers in <i>The Post</i> were largely the West
End tradespeople who desired to reach their West
End patrons. I should lose the political authority
which was based on the support of the privileged
classes. In short, a penny <i>Morning Post</i>
was inconceivable and unthinkable from any
point of view whatever."</p>
<p>To all of which Borthwick listened. He considered
every argument and objection and protest
laid before him. But he was one of those men who
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P337"></SPAN>337}</span>
regarded the opinions of other men not as authoritative
but as the material for forming his own
opinion, and he summed the whole story up in a
sentence:</p>
<p>"Every journalist and every man of business
whom I consulted was opposed to the change and
I finally took my decision to make <i>The Morning
Post</i> a penny paper in the face of a unanimous
remonstrance by friends and experts of all kinds."</p>
<p>When Borthwick told me this some years had
passed since the change had been made. He said:</p>
<p>"In the first year the profits of the paper
doubled. In the second they reached £20,000.
By the fifth the amount was £30,000."</p>
<p>And so it went on until the annual net income
of <i>The Morning Post</i> was £60,000—ten times what
it had been at the price of threepence. It continued
to be the organ of the classes; not, however,
refusing to accept that Tory Democracy of which
Lord Randolph Churchill was the inventor, upon
which Toryism, Conservatism, and Unionism have
ever since thriven. Neither Mayfair nor
Belgravia nor the country houses ever tried to do
without it. The advertisers continued to advertise.
It became, moreover, the organ of the better class
of servants; butlers, ladies' maids, footmen, and
the multitude of menials who sought places in
the best houses.</p>
<p>In other respects also the paper was
revolutionized. It became a newspaper. The day of
the humdrum was over. It had special news
services and capable men to conduct them.
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P338"></SPAN>338}</span>
Borthwick was a patient man impatient of dulness.
He gathered about him good journalists and good
writers; not always the same thing. You now
began to read the news and letters and leaders
from some other motive than a sense of duty.
They were readable. The hand of the master
left its mark on every column.</p>
<p>Nor did the demands of journalism exhaust Sir
Algernon Borthwick's energies. He went into
politics and into Parliament, sitting for a vast
constituency in South Kensington. Lady Borthwick's
help in this political and election business
was invaluable. That very accomplished lady
brought to bear upon the voters of South Kensington
a kind of influence to which they had been
unaccustomed, a social influence. Their wives
took part in the game, neither having nor desiring
votes but able to affect the course of events as
much as if the ballot had been theirs, and more.
Lady Borthwick had 2500 names on her visiting
list, and they were more than names. Each name
stood for an individual whom Lady Borthwick
knew, and whose value she knew. The beautiful
white drawing-room at No. 139 Piccadilly was in
those days a little more thronged of an afternoon
or evening than it had been, but was never
crowded. Some of the best music in London was
to be heard there at tea-time. The dinners were
carefully studied. Dances and evening parties
had a slightly political flavour but were none
the less successful. There is, I suppose, no
place where more than in London their gentle
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P339"></SPAN>339}</span>
influences have a more soothing effect upon an
electorate.</p>
<p>If any reader reflects on the true nature of the
exploit which Borthwick accomplished he will
perhaps agree that the man capable of it must have
had a high order of genius. If it was not creative
in the sense that Lord Northcliffe's is creative, it
was perfectly adapted to the circumstances and the
time. It has not perhaps been quite adequately
recognized. Lord Glenesk was so much a figure
in society that when his name was mentioned
men who knew only the surface of things saw
in him the ornament of a ballroom. He was
that, and he was so very much more that this
ballroom part of his life is hardly even incidental.
He would dance night after night. In the day-time
his mind applied itself to some of the stiffest
problems of a very difficult profession. He told
me one morning he had not been in bed for three
nights. The only answer I could make was that
I did not know he ever went to bed. But I knew
that after sleepless nights he spent days of
necessary hard work at the office, and that he brought
to each matter he dealt with the freshness of a
fresh mind. It was late in life before he began to
know the meaning of the word tired.</p>
<p>Take him for all in all, I should name Lord
Glenesk as one of the three great men I have
known in English journalism. And whether in or
out of journalism he had a kindliness, a charm, a
sweet authority in the affairs of life which do not
belong to all successful men.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P340"></SPAN>340}</span></p>
<p>By and by there appeared in Lady Borthwick's
drawing-rooms a fresh flower of a girl whose
presence at her mother's afternoon concerts and
then at evening parties was a little in advance of
her coming out. Miss Lilias Borthwick is now
the Countess Bathurst and I believe has, when
she chooses to exercise it, full control over <i>The
Morning Post</i>; of which Mr. Fabian Ware is the
present editor, a young journalist who has made
himself a name in his profession. Lady Bathurst
is, like her mother, one of those women who possess
better means of making their wishes and character
felt than by clamouring for votes. There are cases
where womanly charm may be the companion of
settled opinions and convictions and clear purposes,
to which <i>The Morning Post</i> of to-day is a
witness.</p>
<p>One factor in the success of the paper was Oliver
Borthwick, the son of Lord Glenesk. Journalism
attracted him; he entered his father's office early;
his aptitudes for the business showed themselves
at once, and before many years he was managing
editor. He had an inquiring, inventive mind.
He kept his Conservatism for politics, and applied
to the conduct of <i>The Morning Post</i> the most
original and even radical and sometimes daring
methods. He understood details and thought no
detail beneath the notice of a manager. He liked
to do things which the old hands in the office
pronounced impossible, among them that paged
index to the contents of the paper which he first
believed and then proved to be practicable. All
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P341"></SPAN>341}</span>
this did not stand in the way of broad conceptions
and great schemes for which his father gave him a
free hand. Lord Glenesk asked me one day if
Oliver had told me of his newest plan. I said no.
"Well, you had better ask him about it. I shall
not interfere, though it is going to cost a lot of
money"; and he named a sum which ran into many
figures. Those were the relations which existed
between father and son. But there came a day
when they existed no longer. Oliver Borthwick's
joy in his work was such that he never spared
himself and he died at thirty-two, his father still
living. The only gift he lacked was the gift of
adapting his work to his strength. He overworked
recklessly; he could not do otherwise. He would
spare everybody but himself. And so to-day,
instead of being an ornament of his profession
and of social life, Oliver Borthwick is only a
memory and a lasting regret.</p>
<p>Since the foregoing was written Mr. Reginald
Lucas has published his <i>Lord Glenesk and The
Morning Post</i>, an agreeable and informing book.
This is not the place to comment on it but I should
like to add to what I have said above of Lord
Glenesk a passage from a signed review by me
in <i>The Morning Post</i>:</p>
<p><br/></p>
<p>"As I think of the man whom I knew, the importance
of the things he did, great and brilliant
as they were, seems to me less than the importance
of the man himself. If I could, I should
like to describe not what he did but what he was.
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P342"></SPAN>342}</span>
I should say that his friendships, to which I have
already referred, were part not only of his life but
of himself. The range of them would show that.
Political friendships came to him in his position
as a matter of course. But friendships non-political
were more numerous and more remarkable still.
The late Queen's regard for him was a strong one.
Early in life he was the friend of that astonishing
Frenchwoman, Elizabeth Rachel Felix, more
commonly known as Rachel, perhaps the greatest
tragedian of all time, in almost the full flower
of her genius at seventeen. Later in life he was
the friend, the very helpful and trusted friend,
of Madame Sarah Bernhardt. He early conceived
and retained to the end an affection for the French
Emperor. I need not go on with the catalogue
but there are many friends, not to be named, who
were under obligations to him for kindnesses and
whom he seems to have liked because he had helped
them. All through life that was true. He gave
freely, generously, delicately. <i>Nihil humani</i> was
his motto or one of his mottoes. There must have
been many. A life so varied as his does not
move to the music of a single air on a single
string.</p>
<p>"Not the briefest, and not even the most public,
notice of Lord Glenesk can omit all reference to
the happiness of his private life. Even the few
lines above may show what part his wife had in
his happiness, and he in hers. Of his daughter,
Lady Bathurst, Mr. Lucas has told us something
with due reserve; enough to give his readers at
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P343"></SPAN>343}</span>
least a hint of the affection between her and her
father and why it was on both sides so deep, and is
on hers so abiding. Oliver was to all the world a
beloved and brilliant figure, and when the time
came his father's right hand; then finally relieving
him of his executive cares. Then at thirty-two
came the end, and then the father at seventy-five
takes up the burden once more, but not for long.</p>
<p>"Mr. Lucas tells us that President Roosevelt's
'manner of receiving Oliver was particularly
flattering.' I hope it may interest his friends if
I enlarge that a little. Oliver told me when he
came to Washington that he had the usual
introduction from the British Ambassador, which is
indispensable, and asked me what he had better
do. He wished something more than a formal
interview as one of the many whom it was the
President's habit to receive in line, bestowing
a few cordial but conventional words on each.
I saw the President that afternoon, told him
something of Oliver's position and of Oliver
himself. He answered, 'Bring him to lunch
to-morrow.' At lunch the President put him next
to himself and the two talked together during and
after this meal. Then Oliver and I walked away.
He said, 'The President is a great natural force,'
a phrase which recalls Lord Morley's later remark
that the two greatest natural phenomena he had
seen in the United States were Niagara and
President Roosevelt. The day following I again saw
the President, who perhaps will for once allow
himself to be quoted. He said: 'Your friend
<span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P344"></SPAN>344}</span>
Oliver Borthwick is a very young man, but a
man.' Then a pause; then, 'And what charm he
has. It is long since I have met any newcomer
whom I have liked better.'"</p>
<p><br/><br/><br/></p>
<p><SPAN id="chap36"></SPAN></p>
<p><span class="pagenum">{<SPAN id="P345"></SPAN>345}</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />