<h2>CHAPTER X.</h2>
<p>Seen in the Connecticut Prison by Sheriff Bates He Denies That
He is Henry More Smith—After His Release from Prison He
Robbed a Passenger in the Boston Coach—Visits Upper
Canada as a Smuggler—Turns up as a Preacher in the
Southern States—Is Arrested in Maryland for Theft—Possibly
Finished His Career in Toronto.</p>
<div class='c008'>
<ANTIMG class='drop-capi' src='images/ch10-capa.jpg' width-obs='100' alt='' /></div>
<p class='drop-capi_8'>
After I arrived in New Haven, where I was
put in possession of these particulars concerning
him, no person was known in the
United States who could identify him to be the noted
Henry More Smith but myself. I was consequently
requested, for the gratification of the public, to go to
Simsbury Mines to see him. I had the curiosity to
see how he conducted himself at Newgate, and proceeded
to Simsbury, about fifty miles, for the purpose.
On my arrival at Simsbury, I enquired of Capt.
Washburn, the keeper of the prison, how Newman
conducted himself. He answered that he behaved
very well; that he heard that he was a very bad
fellow, but he had so many that were worse he did
not think anything bad in Newman. I further
enquired of the keeper what account Newman gave
of himself, and what he acknowledged to have been
his occupation. His answer to these enquiries
were, that he professed to be a tailor, if anything,
but he had not been accustomed to much hard
work, as he had always been subject to fits; that
his fits were frightful, and that in his agony and
distress he would turn round on his head and
shoulders like a top, and he was so bruised and
chafed with his irons in his convulsive agonies, that
he had taken the shackles off his legs, so that now
he had only one on one leg. This was as convincing
to me as possible that he was my old friend Smith.</p>
<p>The captain asked me if I had a wish to liberate
him. I replied, my object was to ascertain whether
he were a prisoner I had in my custody more than
twelve months, and that if he were, he would know
me immediately, but would not profess to know me.
Accordingly, when he was brought into my presence
in the captain’s room, he maintained a perfect
indifference, and took no notice of me whatever. I
said to him, “Newman, what have you been doing
that has brought you here?” “Nothing,” said he,
“I had an ear-ring with me that belonged to my
wife, and a young lady claimed it and swore it
belonged to her, and I had no friend to speak in
favor of me, and they sent me to prison.” I then
asked him whether he had ever seen me before. He
looked earnestly upon me and said, “I do not know
but I have seen you at New Haven, there were
many men at court.” “Where did you come from?”
His reply was, “I came from Canada.” “What
countryman are you?” “A Frenchman, born in
France.” He had been in London and Liverpool,
but never at Brighton. “Was you ever at Kingston,
New Brunswick?” He answered, “No, he did
not know where that was,” with a countenance as
unmoved as if he had spoken in all the confidence
of truth.</p>
<p>He appeared rather more fleshy than when at
Kingston; but still remained the same subtle,
mysterious being. I understood that he was the
first that had ever effected an exemption from labor
in that prison by or on any pretence whatever. He
kept himself clean and decent, and among the
wretched victims who were daily brought from the
horrid pit in chains and fetters to their daily labor
of making nails, William Newman appeared quite
a distinguished character. So obtuse was he that
he could not be taught to make a nail, and yet so
ingenious was he, that he made a jew’s harp to the
greatest perfection, without being discovered at
work and without its being known until he was
playing on it.</p>
<p>It was in the city of New Haven that the
author published the first edition of these Memoirs,
being aware that here, where his character
and unprecedented actions were perfectly known
throughout the country, the publication of his
doings at Kingston, and his career throughout
the Provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia
would not only be desirable and acceptable, but
would also be received with less scrupulousness,
when brought, as it were, in contact with facts of a
similar nature publicly known and believed.</p>
<p>While these papers were being prepared for the
press, a gentleman from Washington, Major
McDaniel, on his return from Boston, boarded some
time in the same house with me, that of Mr. Joseph
Nichols, and having heard some details from me of
his unprecedented character and actions in New
Brunswick, and having also become acquainted
with the facts relating to his imprisonment and
escape, etc., in that place, could not repress his
curiosity in going to see him, and requested me to
accompany him at his own expense. He observed
that it would be a high gratification to him, on his
return to Washington, that he would not only have
one of my books with him, but would also be able
to say that he had personally seen the sheriff from
New Brunswick that had written the book, and had
seen the remarkable character in the prison of
Newgate that had constituted the subject of the
book, and also the prison of New Haven from which
he escaped.</p>
<p>Accordingly we set out from Newgate, and my
friend had the satisfaction of seeing the noted
Henry More Smith, now William Newman. On
our leaving him, I said to him, “Now, Smith, if
you have anything you wish to communicate to
your wife, I will let her know it.” He looked at
me and said, “Sir, are you going to the Jerseys?”
“Why do you think your wife is there?” “I hope
so; I left her there,” was his reply, and that with
as much firmness and seeming earnestness as if he
had never before seen my face. After I had left
him and returned to New Haven, and furnished the
printer with this additional sketch, and had the
Memoirs completed, one of the books was shown to
him, which he perused with much attention and
replied with seeming indifference that there never
was such a character in existence, but that some
gentleman travelling in the United States had run
short of money, and had invented that book to
defray his expenses!</p>
<p>Immediately after he had read the Memoirs of his
own unparalleled life and actions, and pronounced
the whole a fiction, as if to outdo anything before
recited of him, or attributed to him, he added the
following remarkable feat to the list, already so full
of his singular and unprecedented actions. In the
presence of a number of young persons, and when
there was a fine fire burning on the hearth, he
affected to be suddenly seized with a violent
convulsive fit, falling down on the floor and
bounding and writhing about as if in the most
agonizing suffering. And what constituted the
wonder of this masterpiece of affectation was, that
in his spasmodic contortions his feet came in contact
with the fire, and were literally beginning to be
roasted, without his appearing to feel any pain from
the burning. This circumstance confirmed the
belief in the bystanders that the fit was a reality;
and he did not miss his aim in showing off his
spasmodic attack, which was indeed done to the
life. He was consequently exempted from hard
labor, and was permitted to employ himself in any
trifling occupation he chose, or in making jew’s
harps, pen-knives, knives of various descriptions,
and rings, in the mechanism of which he displayed
much original talent and characteristic ingenuity.
Many persons, from mere curiosity, purchased
among the rest may be instanced the case of two
young men, who very much admired his small
pen-knives, and proposed purchasing two of them
on condition of his engraving his name on the
handles of them. He immediately engraved, with
perfect neatness, “Henry More Smith,” on one side
of one of them, “William Newman,” on the other
side, and on the other knife he engraved,
“Mysterious Stranger.” These knives were kept
by their owners as curiosities, and many persons
were much gratified by seeing them. One of them
was sometime after brought to Kingston, and I
myself had the gratification of seeing the name of
my old domestic engraved on the handle.</p>
<p>Under the indulgent treatment he received in
Newgate, he became perfectly reconciled to his
situation, manifesting no desire to leave it.
“Contentment” he said, “is the brightest jewel in
this life, and I was never more contented in my
life.” Consequently he never attempted any means
of escape.</p>
<p>After the period of his imprisonment was up,
and he had received his discharge, he left with the
keeper of the prison a highly finished pocket-knife,
of moderate size, the handle of which contained a
watch, complete in all its parts, keeping time
regularly. And what excited much wonder in
reference to this ingenious and singularly curious
piece of mechanism, was the fact that he had never
been found at work on any part of the watch or
knife, and yet there was no doubt in the minds of
those who saw it that it was in reality the production
of his own genius, and the work of his own hands.
For this information I was indebted to a gentleman
named Osborne, who resided in the neighbourhood,
and who stated that he had seen the watch and
knife himself, and that it was regarded by all as a
most wonderful piece of ingenuity.</p>
<p>He left Simsbury decently apparelled, and with
some money in his pocket, and in possession of
some articles of his own handiwork. He directed
his course eastward, and was seen in Boston; but
for some time nothing particular or striking was
heard of him. The first thing concerning him, that
arrested public attention, was published in the
Boston Bulletin, and which came under my own
eye:</p>
<p class='c013'><span class='sc'>Beware of Pickpockets!</span>—As the stage coach,
full of passengers, was on its way to this city a few
evenings since, one of the passengers rang the bell,
and cried out to the driver to stop his horses, as his
pockets had been picked of a large sum of money
since he entered the coach; and at the same time
requested the driver would not let any of the
passengers get out of the coach; it being dark, until
he, the aforesaid passenger, should bring a light
in order to have a general search. This caused a
general feeling of pockets among the passengers,
when another passenger cried out that his pocket-book
had also been stolen. The driver did as
directed until the gentleman who first spoke should
have time to have procured a lamp, but whether he
found it or not remained quite uncertain. But no
doubt he found the light he intended should answer
his purpose, as he did not make his appearance in
any other light. However the passenger who really
lost his pocket-book, which, although it did not
contain but a small amount of money, thinks he
shall hereafter understand what is meant when a
man in a stage coach calls out thief, and that he will
prefer darkness rather than light, if ever such an
evil joke is offered to be played with him again.</p>
<p>As he was continually changing his name, as well
as his place, it was impossible always to identify
his person, especially as few persons in the United
States were personally acquainted with him. The
difficulty of recognizing him was not a little
increased also by the circumstances of his continually
changing his external appearance; and the
iniquitous means by which he could obtain money
and change of apparel, always afforded him a
perfect facility of assuming a different appearance.
In addition to these circumstances also, as a
feature of character which no less contributed
to the difficulty of identifying him, must be taken
into account his unequalled and inimitable ease
in affecting different and various characters, and
his perfect and unembarrassed composure in the
most difficult and perplexing circumstances. To
the identity and eccentricity, therefore, of his
actions, rather than to our knowledge of the
identity of his person and name, we must depend,
in our future attempts to trace his footsteps and mark
their characteristic points.</p>
<p>On this ground, therefore, there is not the shadow
of a doubt that the robbery committed in the stage
coach, and that the originality of the means by
which he carried off his booty pointed with unhesitating
certainty to the noted character of our
narrative. After this depredation in the coach,
with which he came off successful, it would appear
that he bended his course in disguise through the
States of Connecticut and New York, assuming
different characters and committing many robberies
undiscovered and even unsuspected for a length of
time, and afterwards made his appearance in Upper
Canada in the character of a gentleman merchant
from New Brunswick with a large quantity of
smuggled goods from New York, which he said was
coming on after him in wagons. These, he said,
he intended to dispose of on very moderate terms,
so as to suit purchasers.</p>
<p>Here he called upon my brother, Augustus Bates,
Deputy Postmaster, at Wellington Square, head of
Lake Ontario, and informed the family that he was
well acquainted with Sheriff Bates at Kingston, and
that he called to let them know that he and his
family were well. He regretted very much that he
had not found Mr. Bates at home, and stated that
he was upon urgent and important business and
could not tarry with them for the night, but would
leave a letter for him. This he accordingly did,
properly addressed, and in good handwriting; but
when it was opened, and its contents examined, no
one in the place could make out the name of the
writer, or read any part of the letter! It appeared
to have been written in the characters of some
foreign language, but it could not be decyphered.
This was another of his characteristic eccentricities,
but his intention in it could not be well understood.</p>
<p>He did not appear to make himself particularly
known to the family, nor to cultivate any further
acquaintance with them, but proceeded thence to
the principal boarding house in the town and
engaged entertainments for himself and thirteen
other persons, who, he said, were engaged in
bringing on his wagons, loaded with his smuggled
goods. Having thus fixed upon a residence for
himself and his gang of wagoners, he then called
upon all the principal merchants in the town, on
pretence of entering into contracts for storing large
packages of goods, and promising to give great
bargains to purchasers on their arrival, and in
some instances actually received money as earnest
on some packages of saleable goods, for the sale of
which he entered into contracts. It may be
remarked, by the way, that he wrote also in an
unknown and unintelligible hand to the celebrated
Captain Brant, the same as he had written to
Mr. Bates, but with what view was equally
mysterious and unaccountable.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding his genteel and respectable
appearance, there was a singularity in his manner
and conduct which, with all his tact and experience,
he could not altogether conceal, and hence arose
some suspicions as to the reality of his pretensions.
These suspicions received confirmation, and were
soon matured into the reality of his being a genteel
imposter, from the fact that the time for the arrival
of his wagons was now elapsed, and that they
were not making an appearance. At this juncture,
when public attention and observation were directed
to the stranger to observe which way the balance
would turn, an individual named Brown, who had
formerly resided in New Brunswick, and moved
with his family to Canada, coming into contact
with the gentleman, recognized him from a certain
mark he carried on his face to be the far-famed
Henry More Smith, whom he had seen and known
when in gaol at Kingston.</p>
<p>This report passing immediately into circulation,
gave the imposter a timely signal to depart, without
waiting for the arrival of his wagons and
baggage, and without loss of time he took his
departure from Canada, by the way of Lake Erie,
through the Michigan Territory, and down the
Ohio to the Southern States. With his proceedings
during this course of his travels we are entirely
unacquainted; therefore the reader must be left
to his own reflections as to his probable adventures
as he travelled through this immense tract of
country. There is no reason for doubt, however,
that he had by this time, and even long before,
become so confirmed in his iniquitous courses that
he would let no occasion pass unimproved that
would afford him an opportunity of indulging in
the predominant propensity of mind which seemed
to glory in the prosecutions of robberies and
plunder, as well as in the variety of means by
which he effected his unheard of and unprecedented
escapes.</p>
<p>After his arrival in the Southern States, we are
again able to glean something of his life and
history. While he was yet in the gaol at King’s
county, it will be remembered that he said he had
been a preacher, and that he should preach again,
and would gain proselytes; and now his prediction
is brought about, for under a new name, that of
Henry Hopkins, he appeared in the character of a
preacher in the Southern States! And what
wonder? For Satan himself is transformed into
an angel of light. Here, even in this character he
was not without success, for he got many to follow
and admire him; yet deep as his hypocrisy was, he
seemed to be fully sensible of it, although his
conscience had become seared, and was proof
against any proper sense of wrong. He
acknowledged that he had been shocked to see so
many follow him to hear him preach, and even to
be affected under his preaching.</p>
<p>Our source of information does not furnish us
with any of the particulars which marked his
conduct while itinerating through the South in his
newly assumed character; yet general accounts
went on to say that he had, for a length of time, so
conducted himself that he gained much popularity
in his ministerial calling, and had a considerable
number of adherents. However, this may have
been the case for a length of time, yet as the
assumption of this new character could not be
attributable to any supernatural impulse, but was
merely another feature of a character already so
singularly diversified, intended as a cloak under
which he might, with less liability to suspicion,
indulge the prevailing and all controlling propensities
of his vitiated mind, it was not to be
expected, with all the ingenuity he was capable of
exercising, that he would long be able to conceal
his real character. Accordingly, some misdemeanor,
which we have not been able to trace, at length
disclosed the hypocrisy of his character, and placed
him before his deluded followers in his true light.</p>
<p>It would appear, whatever might have been the
nature of his crime, that legal means were adopted
for his apprehension, and that in order to expedite
his escape from the hands of justice, he had seized
upon a certain gentleman’s coach and horses and
was travelling in the character of a gentleman in
state, when he was overtaken and apprehended in
the State of Maryland. Here he was tried and
convicted, and sentenced to seven years imprisonment
in the state prison in Baltimore, which,
from the nature of the climate, was generally
believed would terminate his career. The particulars
of this adventure I received in the city of
New York in 1827, where I took much pains to
obtain all possible information concerning his
proceedings in the Southern States while passing
under the character of a preacher.</p>
<p>In 1833 it so happened that I had occasion to
visit the city of New York again, when I renewed
my enquiries concerning him, but to no effect; no
sources of information to which I had access yielded
any account of him, and the most rational conjecture
was that he either terminated his course in
the state prison at Baltimore, or that one day,
should he outlive the period of his confinement and
be again let loose upon the peace of society, some
fresh development of his character would point out
the scene of his renewed depredations.</p>
<p>In this painful state of obscurity I was reluctantly
obliged to leave the hero of our narrative on my
return from New York.</p>
<p>Another year had nearly elapsed before any
additional light was thrown upon his history; but
in an unexpected moment, when the supposition of
his having ended his career in the prison at
Baltimore was becoming fixed, I received, by the
politeness of a friend, a file of the <cite>New York
Times</cite>, one of the numbers of which contained
the following article, bringing our adventurer again
full into view in his usual characteristic style:</p>
<p class='c013'>“<span class='sc'>Police Office—robbery and Speedy Arrest</span>:
A French gentleman from the South, (so represented
by himself), who has for a few weeks past under
the name of Henry Bond, been running up a bill
and running down the fare, at the Francklin House,
was this afternoon arrested at the establishment on
the ungentlemanly charge of pillaging the trunks
of lodgers. Since his sojourn a variety of articles
had disappeared from the chambers of the hotel,
and amongst the rest about two hundred dollars
from the trunk of one gentleman. No one, however,
had thought of suspecting the French gentleman,
who was also a lodger, until this morning, when,
unfortunately for him, his face was recognized by a
gentleman who knew him to have been in the state
prison at Baltimore. However, on searching him,
which he readily complied with, not one cent of
the money could be found either upon his baggage
or his person; but in lieu thereof, they found him
possessed of a large number of small keys, through
which, no doubt, he found means of disposing of
any surplus of circulating medium, whereupon
his quarters were changed to Bridewell until the
ensuing term of General Sessions.”</p>
<p>Here he remained in confinement until the period
of his trial came round, when, for want of sufficient
evidence to commit him to the state prison, he was
thence discharged, and the next account we hear of
him brings him before our view under the name of
Henry Preston, arrested in the act of attempting to
rob the Northern Mail Coach, as will appear by the
following article extracted from the <cite>Times</cite>:</p>
<p class='c013'><span class='sc'>Police Office</span>, Monday, Feb. 22nd, 1835—Just
as this office was closing on Saturday evening, a
very gentlemanly looking man, decently dressed,
calling himself Henry Preston, was brought up in
the custody of the driver and guard of the Northern
mail stage who charged him with an attempt to
rob the mail. The accusers testified that within a
short distance of Peekskill they discovered the
prisoner about a hundred yards ahead of the stage,
and on approaching nearer they saw him jump over
a fence, evidently to avoid notice. This, of course,
excited their suspicion, and they kept an eye to the
mail which was deposited in the boot. In the course
of a short time the guard discovered the rat nibbling
at the bait, and desiring the driver not to stop the
speed of the horses, he quietly let himself down and
found the prisoner actively employed loosening the
strap which confines the mail-bag! He was
instantly arrested, placed in the carriage and carried
to town free of expense. Having nothing to offer
in extenuation of his offence, Mr. Henry Preston was
committed to Bridewell until Monday for further
investigation.</p>
<p class='c013'><span class='sc'>Police Office</span>, Monday morning—This morning,
Henry Preston, committed for attempting to rob the
Northern Mail, was brought up before the Sitting
Magistrates, when the High Sheriff of Orange
county appeared and demanded the prisoner,
whose real name was Henry Gibney, as a fugitive
from justice? He stated that the prisoner was to
have been tried for grand larceny, and was lodged
in the House of Detention at Newburgh, on
Thursday, under care of two persons—that in the
course of the night he eluded the vigilance
of his keepers, escaped from confinement, and
crossed the river on the ice, and had got down as
far as Peekskill where he says he attempted to get
on top of the stage that he might get into New York
as soon as possible.</p>
<p>By order of the judges the prisoner was delivered
up to the sheriff of Orange County, to be recognized
there for his trial for the offence with which he
was originally charged, at the next general session
of the Supreme Court. But before the time came
round he had, as on most former occasions, contrived
to make his escape, and directed his course towards
Upper Canada.</p>
<p>Of the particular manner of his escape, and his
adventures on his way through to Canada we can
state nothing with certainty; but like all his
previous movements, we may hazard the conjecture
that they were such as would do the usual honor to
his wretched profession. Yet, with all his tact, he
could not always escape the hands of justice; and
hence his course is not unfrequently interrupted,
and his progress impeded by the misfortunes of the
prison. It is owing to this circumstance that we
are enabled to keep pace with him in Upper Canada,
where we find him confined in the gaol of Toronto
under the charge of burglary.</p>
<p>For this information the writer is indebted to
his brother, Mr. Augustus Bates, residing in Upper
Canada. From his letter, dated 4th August, 1835,
we make the following extract, which will point
out the circumstances which have guided us in
endeavoring to follow up the history of the
Mysterious Stranger to the present time:</p>
<p class='c013'><span class='sc'>Dear Brother</span>—I now sit down to acknowledge
the receipt of a number of your letters, especially
your last by Mr. Samuel Nichols, in which you
mentioned that you were writing a new edition of
‘More Smith.’ I have to request that you will
suspend the publication until you hear from me
again. There is a man now confined in Toronto
gaol who bears the description of More Smith, and
is supposed to be the same. Many things are told
of him which no other person could perform. I
will not attempt to repeat them, as I cannot vouch
for their truth. From current reports I was induced
to write to the sheriff, who had him in charge,
requesting him to give me a correct account of him.
I have not heard from the sheriff since I wrote;
perhaps he is waiting to see in what manner he is
to be disposed of. Report says the man is
condemned to be executed for shop-breaking—he
wishes the sheriff to do his duty; that he had much
rather be hanged than sent to the penitentiary.
Many are the curious stories told of him, which, as
I said before, I will not vouch for. Should the
sheriff write to me, his information may be relied
on.</p>
<p>Several communications from Upper Canada
have reached us between the date of the letter from
which the above extract is made and the present
time, but none of them contained the desired
information as to the particular fate of the prisoner,
and the manner in which he was disposed of, until
the 8th of September last, 1836.</p>
<p>By a letter from Mr. Augustus Bates, bearing
this date, it would appear that the prisoner had not
been executed, but had been sentenced to one year’s
confinement in the penitentiary. We make the
following extract:</p>
<p class='c013'>“I give you all the information I can obtain
respecting the prisoner enquired after. The gaoler,
who is also the deputy sheriff, that had him in
charge, says he could learn nothing from him;
said he called his name Smith, that he was fifty-five
years old, but denies that he was ever in Kingston,
New Brunswick. The jailer had one of your books
and showed it to him, but he denied any knowledge
of it, and would not give any satisfaction to the
enquiries he made of him. The sheriff says he
believes the person to be the same mysterious
stranger; that he was condemned and sentenced to
the penitentiary for one year. His crime was
burglary.”</p>
<p>It would have afforded the writer of these Memoirs
great satisfaction, and, no doubt, an equal satisfaction
to the reader, had it been in his power to have
paid a visit to Upper Canada that he might be able
to state from his own certain and personal
knowledge of the prisoner at Toronto, that he was
indeed the self-same noted individual that was in
his custody twenty-two years ago, and whom he
had the gratification of seeing and recognizing
subsequently at the Simsbury Mines, where he
played off his affected fits with such art and
consequent advantage.</p>
<p>But although it is not in the writer’s power to
close up his Memoir with so important and valuable
a discovery—yet, keeping in view the characteristic
features of the man—his professed ignorance of
Kingston in New Brunswick—his denial of ever
having seen the first edition of the Memoirs, and
the care which he took to keep himself enveloped
in mystery, by utterly declining to give any satisfactory
information concerning himself; all these
circumstances united, form a combination of features
so marked as to carry conviction to the mind of the
reader who has traced him through this narrative,
that he is no other than the same mysterious Henry
More Smith.</p>
<p>There is another feature in the prisoner at Toronto
that seems strangely corroborative of what we are
desirous properly to establish, that is his age. He
acknowledges to be fifty-five years of age, and
although this would make him somewhat older than
his real age, yet it fixes this point—that the
prisoner at Toronto is well advanced in years, and
so must the subject of our Memoirs be also.</p>
<p>From information which we have obtained it
seems that he has undergone his trial, and was
committed to the penitentiary for a year’s confinement.
Whether he found any means of effecting
an exemption from labor in the penitentiary and
then reconciling himself to his confinement, or
whether he accomplished one of his ingenious
departures, we are unable to determine. One thing
however, is highly probable—that he is again
going up and down in the earth in the practice of
his hoary-headed villainy, except Power from on
High has directed the arrow of conviction to heart;
for no inferior impulse would be capable of giving
a new direction to the life and actions of a man whose
habits of iniquity have been ripened into maturity
and obtained an immovable ascendancy by the
practice of so many successive years.</p>
<p>It must be acknowledged that there is an unprecedented
degree of cleverness in all his adventures,
which casts a kind of illusive and momentary
covering over the real character of his actions, and
would seem to engage an interest in his favor, (and
this is an error to which the human mind seems
remarkable pre-disposed when vice presents itself
before us in all its cleverness), yet who can read
his miserable career without feeling pained at the
melancholy picture of depravity it presents? Who
would have supposed that after his condemnation
and sentence at Kingston, and his life, by an act of
human mercy, given into his hands again, he would
not have hastened to his sorrowing little wife, and
with tears of compunction, mingled with those of
joy, cast himself upon her neck and resolved by a
course of future rectitude and honesty, to make her
as happy as his previous disgraceful and sinful
career had made her miserable.</p>
<p>But ah! no. His release was followed by no such
effects. Rendered unsusceptible for every natural
and tender impression, and yet under the full
dominion of the god of this world, he abandoned
the intimate of his bosom, and set out single handed
in the fresh pursuit of crime.</p>
<p>There is, however, one redeeming feature which
stands out among the general deformities of his
character. In all the adventures which the history
of his course presents to our view, we are not called
upon to witness any acts of violence and blood; and
it is perhaps owing to the absence of this repulsive
trait of character that we do not behold him in a
more relentless light.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />