<h2>CHAPTER IX<br/> <span class="small">THE KING'S DIVORCE<br/> 1527-1529</span></h2>
<p class="nodent"><span class="smcap">If</span>
Wolsey hoped that the peace with France, which he
had so successfully concluded in the beginning of 1527,
would enable him to reassert England's influence on the
Continent, and would give him an opportunity for the
work of domestic reform, he was sorely disappointed. A
new matter arose, not entirely unexpected, but which
widened into unexpected issues, and consumed Wolsey's
energies till it led to his fall. The project of the king's
divorce was suddenly mooted; and this personal matter,
before it was ripe for settlement, gradually drew into its
sphere all the questions concerning England's foreign
and domestic policy which Wolsey's statesmanship had
been trying to solve by wise and well-considered means.
Wolsey had been gathering into his hands the threads of
a complicated policy, each one of which required dexterous
handling, in accordance with a great design. He
found himself suddenly called upon to act precipitately
for the accomplishment of a small matter, which brought
all the difficulties of his position prominently forward,
and gave him no time for that skilful diplomacy in
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_151" id="Page_151">{151}</SPAN></span>
which he excelled. Moreover, when the project was
started neither Henry nor Wolsey could have foreseen
the complications which would arise; still less could
Wolsey have known the obstinacy which the faintest
opposition to the royal will would develop in the king,
or the extent to which he could persuade himself that
the satisfaction of the royal pleasure was the sole purpose
of the existence of the power of the State. At first
Henry had sympathised with Wolsey's far-reaching
schemes. Latterly he had at all events been willing to
allow Wolsey to have his own way on the whole. The
time came when he showed himself a hard taskmaster,
and demanded that Wolsey should at all costs satisfy his
personal desires in a matter which he persuaded himself
was all-important to the nation at large.</p>
<p>Viewed according to the general notions of the time,
there was nothing very surprising in the fact that Henry
VIII. should wish for a divorce. Royal marriages were
made and unmade from motives of expediency; it was
only a question of obtaining a decent plea. The sons
of Katharine had died in infancy, and Mary was the only
heir of the English throne; it was a matter of importance
to the future of England that the succession to the
throne should be clearly established. If Henry had
remained attached to his wife this consideration would
not have been put forward; but Henry was never famed
for constancy. He was in the prime of life, while
Katharine was over forty. He had developed in character,
not for the better, while she remained true to the
narrow traditions of her early training. She was an
excellent housewife, conscientious, decorous, and capable;
but she was devoted to the political interests of Spain,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_152" id="Page_152">{152}</SPAN></span>
and admired her nephew Charles. While the imperial
alliance was warmly pursued by Henry she was
happy; when Henry's zeal for Charles began to
fade she felt offended, and was not judicious in the
display of her political bias. Henry was more and more
annoyed by his wife's discontent, and the breach between
them rapidly widened. When Henry broke with
Charles and allied himself with France he seems to
have felt that his domestic peace was at an end, and he
was not the man to shrink from the effort to re-establish
it upon another basis.</p>
<p>Perhaps none of these considerations would have
moved Henry to take prompt action if his desires
had not been kindled by a new object of his affection.
He had not been a faithful husband, and Katharine seems
to have been indulgent to his infidelities. In the course
of 1526 he was captivated by the charms of Anne Boleyn,
as he had formerly been captivated by her sister Mary.
But Anne had learned that the king was fickle, and she
resolved that she would not be so easily won as to be
lightly abandoned. She skilfully managed to make herself
agreeable to the king till his passion for her became
so violent that he was prepared to accept her terms and
make her his lawful wife.</p>
<p>Wolsey was not in favour of this plan; but he was
not opposed to getting rid of the political influence
of Katharine, and he believed that the king's fancy
for Anne Boleyn would rapidly pass away. Whatever
his own personal opinion might be, he did not venture
to gainsay the king in a matter on which he was resolved,
and he lent himself to be an instrument in a matter
which involved him in measures which became more and
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_153" id="Page_153">{153}</SPAN></span>
more discreditable. The first idea of the king was to
declare his marriage with Katharine unlawful, on the
ground that she had previously been his brother's wife;
but he was cognisant of that when he married her and
had applied for a papal dispensation to remedy that
source of invalidity. Doubtless some plea might be
discovered to enable the Pope to set aside the dispensation
granted by his predecessor. But whatever technical
grounds might be used to justify the Pope's decision in
the king's favour, the Pope could not be expected to act
in such a manner as to offend the Powers of Europe and
shock the moral sense of Englishmen. Wolsey did not
hide from himself that there were three hindrances in
the way of legalising the king's divorce. The opinion
of England was not in its favour; Charles V. was likely
to resent the affront which it would put upon his aunt,
and the Pope could not afford to alienate one who was
becoming all-powerful in Italy that he might win the
distant friendship of the English king; Francis I. had
just made a treaty with Henry VIII., by which the hand
of Mary had been promised to his son, and he was not
likely to wish to see Mary declared to be illegitimate.
These were serious elements of opposition, which it
would require considerable skill to overcome.</p>
<p>The first measure which suggested itself to Henry and
Wolsey was to put the king's plea into shape, and endorse
it with the authority of the English Church. For this
purpose a suit was secretly instituted against the king
in Wolsey's legatine court. Henry was solemnly informed
that a complaint had been made to Wolsey, as
censor of public morals, that he had cohabited for
eighteen years with his brother's wife. Henry consented
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_154" id="Page_154">{154}</SPAN></span>
that Archbishop Warham should be joined with Wolsey
as assessor, and named a proctor who should plead his
cause. Three sessions of this court were held with the
profoundest secrecy in May; but in spite of all the
attempts at secrecy the imperial ambassador discovered
what was going on. The object of this procedure seems
to have been to produce a sentence from the legate's
court in England which should be confirmed by the
Pope without right of appeal. If the Pope had been
a free agent he might conceivably have adopted this
course; but the news soon reached England that Rome
had been sacked by Bourbon, and that the Pope was
trembling before Charles V. In this turn of affairs it
was useless to proceed farther on the supposition that
he would unhesitatingly comply with the wishes of
Henry and Wolsey. A court sitting in secret would
have no influence on English opinion, and Wolsey proposed
that its sittings should be suspended, and the
opinions of the English bishops be taken as a means of
educating public opinion.</p>
<p>But Katharine had been informed of the king's intentions
concerning her, and showed a purpose of defending
her rights. It would be very awkward if she were the
first to make the matter public, and were to appeal to
the Pope or her kinsman Charles. The question would
then become a political question, and Henry was not
prepared with allies. So on 22d June the king broached
his difficulties to Katharine. He told her of his scruples,
and of his intentions of submitting them to the decision
of canonists and theologians; meanwhile they had
better live apart. Katharine burst into tears, and the
king vaguely tried to assure her that all was being done
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_155" id="Page_155">{155}</SPAN></span>
for the best, and begged her to keep the matter secret.
His only object was to prevent her from taking any
open steps till he had assured himself of the countenance
of the French king to his plans. For this purpose
Wolsey was sent on an embassy, ostensibly to settle
some questions raised by the French treaty, really to
concert with Francis I. a scheme for bringing to bear
upon the Pope a pressure which should be strong enough
to counteract the influence of Charles V. So, on 3d July,
Wolsey left London on his last diplomatic mission. Men
who saw Wolsey set out with more than his accustomed
state, escorted by nine hundred horsemen, thought, doubtless,
that the cardinal's greatness was as high as ever;
but those who watched more closely saw him in the
splendid ceremonial of the Church of Canterbury "weep
very tenderly," for his mind was ill at ease. He must
have felt that he was going to use his talents for a bad
end, and that all patriotism and nobility had vanished
from his aim. On his way to Dover he had a conference
with Archbishop Warham, whom he instructed about
the conduct to be observed towards the queen. Then
at Rochester he sounded Bishop Fisher, the most holy
and upright of the English bishops, who had already
been asked by Katharine to give her counsel, though
she had not ventured to tell him what was the subject
on which she wished for his advice. So Wolsey told
his own story; that the king's conscience was disquiet,
and that he wished to have his scruples set at
rest by the opinions of learned men. He represented
that Katharine by her hastiness was throwing difficulties
in the way of the king's considerate procedure, and
threatened to publish the matter, and so create an open
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_156" id="Page_156">{156}</SPAN></span>
scandal. Fisher believed Wolsey's tale, and was beguiled
into a belief of the king's good intentions, which
the queen could not understand. About the validity of
Henry's marriage Wolsey could not get from Fisher an
opinion contrary to the authority of a papal dispensation;
but he contrived to alienate Fisher from sympathy
with Katharine, and so left the queen without a
friend while he proceeded to machinate against her in
France.</p>
<p>We have from one of Wolsey's attendants, George
Cavendish, his gentleman-usher, a full account of
Wolsey's journey in France. On one point he gives
us valuable insight into Wolsey's character where
Wolsey has been much misrepresented. He tells us
how at Calais he summoned his attendants and addressed
them about their behaviour. He explained
that the services which he required from them were not
personal but official, and his words were those of a
statesman who understood, but did not over-estimate, the
value of external things. "Ye shall understand," he
said, "that the king's majesty, upon certain weighty
considerations, hath for the more advancement of his
royal dignity assigned me in this journey to be his
lieutenant-general, and what reverence belongeth to the
same I will tell you. That for my part I must, by
virtue of my commission of lieutenantship, assume and
take upon me, in all honours and degrees, to have all
such service and reverence as to his highness's presence
is meet and due, and nothing thereof to be neglected or
omitted by me that to his royal estate is appurtenant.
And for my part, ye shall see me that I will not omit
one jot thereof." Then he added some wise advice
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_157" id="Page_157">{157}</SPAN></span>
about the courtesies to be observed in their intercourse
with the French.</p>
<p>When matters of etiquette had thus been arranged,
Wolsey rode out of Calais on 22d July, and pursued his
journey to Abbeville, where he awaited the arrival of
Francis I. at Amiens. On 4th August he entered Amiens,
and was received with royal honours. His interviews
with Francis and the queen-mother were most satisfactory
on matters of general policy: the English
alliance was firmly accepted, and all questions between
the two Crowns were in a fair way towards settlement.
Wolsey waited till the political alliance was firmly established
before he broached the personal matter of the
divorce. Meanwhile he meditated on the schemes which
might be pursued by the allied kings to satisfy
Henry's desires. He proposed that they should join in
demanding from Charles V. that he should restore the
Pope's independence, in the hope that the Pope when
freed from constraint would be willing to show his
gratitude by complying with Henry's demands. If
they failed in procuring the Pope's release, they should
declare the papal power to be in abeyance, and summon
the cardinals to meet at Avignon, where, under Wolsey's
presidency, they should transact such business as the
Pope in his captivity was unable to discharge.</p>
<p>Either of these methods was technically decorous;
but they did not much commend themselves to Henry
VIII., whose passion for Anne Boleyn daily increased,
and who was impatient of any procedure that involved
delay. So Henry listened coldly to Wolsey's proposals
for a "sure, honourable, and safe" termination of the
"king's matter," as the divorce was now called: he
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_158" id="Page_158">{158}</SPAN></span>
wished for a "good and brief conclusion," and gave ear
to the advice of Anne Boleyn and her friends. It was
easy for them to point out that Wolsey was an old-fashioned
statesman, full of prejudice where the Church
was concerned. They urged that the king could do
better for himself, and could deal more expeditiously
with the Pope than could a churchman who was bound
to adopt a humble attitude towards his ecclesiastical
superior. So Henry determined to take the matter
into his own hands, and send his secretary Knight to
negotiate with the Pope without Wolsey's intervention.</p>
<p>Wolsey, meanwhile, in ignorance of the King's intentions,
but distressed at the difficulties which he foresaw,
followed the French Court to Compiegne, where he
divided his time between diplomatic conflicts, festivities,
and the despatch of business. One morning, Cavendish
tells us, "He rose early about four of the clock, sitting
down to write letters into England unto the king, commanding
one of his chaplains to prepare him to mass,
insomuch that the said chaplain stood revested until
four of the clock at afternoon; all which season my
lord never rose once even to eat any meat, but continually
wrote his letters, with his own hands, having all
that time his nightcap and kerchief on his head. And
about the hour of four of the clock, at afternoon, he
made an end of writing, and commanded one Christopher
Gunner, the king's servant, to prepare him without
delay to ride empost into England with his letters,
whom he despatched away or ever he drank. And that
done he went to mass, and said his other divine service
with his chaplain, as he was accustomed to do; and then
went straight into a garden; and after he had walked
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_159" id="Page_159">{159}</SPAN></span>
the space of an hour or more, and said his evensong, he
went to dinner and supper all at once; and making a
small repast, he went to his bed, to take his rest for the
night."</p>
<p>While Wolsey was thus labouring in this thorny
matter, he received a visit from Knight on his way to
Rome. Knight's instructions were to demand from the
Pope a dispensation for Henry to marry again before
the divorce from Katharine had been pronounced; failing
this, to marry immediately after his marriage with
Katharine was declared invalid. Further, he was to
ask the Pope to issue a bull delegating his spiritual
authority to Cardinal Wolsey during his captivity. No
doubt this was an expeditious way to cut existing difficulties;
but it was too expeditious to suit the traditions
of the Papal Court. Its obvious clumsiness showed that
it was not the work of Wolsey's hand; and it was
unwise for the king to inform the Pope that he was
trying to act without Wolsey's knowledge.</p>
<p>Though Wolsey was left in ignorance of the nature
of Knight's instructions, he could not but suspect that
the king was acting without his full knowledge. He
finished his work at Compiegne and returned to England
at the end of September. He at once repaired to the
Court at Richmond, and sent to tell the king of his
arrival. Hitherto the king had always retired to a
private room when he received the cardinal alone.
Now Anne Boleyn was with the king in the great
hall, and scarcely had Wolsey's message been delivered
than she broke in, "Where else should the cardinal
come than here where the king is?" The king confirmed
her command, and Wolsey found himself ushered
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_160" id="Page_160">{160}</SPAN></span>
into the hall, where Henry sat amusing himself with
Anne and his favourites. Serious talk was out of the
question. Wolsey was no longer first in the king's
confidence. He went away feeling that Anne Boleyn
was his political rival, whom he could only overcome by
serving better than she could serve herself. Henceforth
he had two masters instead of one, and he did not deceive
himself that the continuance of his power depended
solely on his usefulness in the matter of the divorce.</p>
<p>As Wolsey showed himself compliant, Anne Boleyn
treated him graciously while she waited to hear the
result of Knight's mission to Rome. It was not easy
for him to enter the city, which was in possession of the
Spaniards, and when he entered it he could not hold
any personal communication with Clement VII., who was
shut up in the Castle of St. Angelo. On 9th December
Clement escaped to Orvieto, where Knight soon joined
him, and showed his incapacity for the work which had
been confided to him by revealing to the papal officials
the whole details of the matter, which he ought to
have kept secret. Clement saw at once the value of
Henry's conscientious scruples, and learned that he was
moved solely by a desire to marry Anne Boleyn, a
connection which could not be excused by any paramount
reasons of political expediency. However anxious the
Pope might be to oblige the English king, there were
limits to his complacency, and Knight had not the wits
to cast a fair appearance over a disgraceful matter. Yet
Clement did not wish to offend Henry by refusing
his request at once. The demand for a dispensation
empowering the king to marry at once had already
been dropped at Wolsey's instance. Knight carried
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_161" id="Page_161">{161}</SPAN></span>
with him a form of dispensation allowing Henry to
marry as soon as his marriage with Katharine was dissolved.
This form was amended by one of the cardinals,
and was signed by the Pope. Knight started
back to England, convinced that he had done his business
excellently, and was bearing to the king the permission
which he desired.</p>
<p>When the documents were placed in Wolsey's hands
he saw at once that they were worthless. What Henry
wanted was permission for Wolsey to decide the question
in the Pope's behalf, and permission for himself to
act at once as soon as Wolsey's decision was pronounced.
The documents which he received did not bar Katharine's
right of appeal; consequently Wolsey's decision
would be of no effect, and the king could not lawfully
marry again pending the appeal. In fact, the Pope
reserved the entire decision of the matter in his own
hand.</p>
<p>It was a small matter for Wolsey to triumph over a
man like Knight; but Knight's failure showed Henry
and Anne Boleyn that they must put their confidence in
Wolsey after all. So in February 1528 Wolsey had to
begin again from the beginning, and had to undo the
mischief which Knight's bungling had made. He chose
as his agents his secretary, Stephen Gardiner, and
Edward Foxe, one of the king's chaplains. They were
instructed to ask that the Pope would join with Wolsey
some special legate, and give them power to pronounce a
final judgment. For this purpose they were to plead
Henry's cause with all earnestness, and say that the king
was moved only by the scruples of his conscience; at the
same time they were to praise the virtues of Anne
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_162" id="Page_162">{162}</SPAN></span>
Boleyn, and say that the king was solely moved by considerations
of his duty to his country in his desire to
marry her. Further, they were to insist on the dishonour
which would be done to the Holy See if the
Pope, through fear of Charles V., were to refuse to do
justice. If the king could not obtain justice from the
Pope he would be compelled to seek it elsewhere, and
live outside the laws of Holy Church; and however reluctant,
he would be driven to this for the quiet of his
conscience.</p>
<p>Truly these pleas were sorely contradictory. Henry
was ready to acknowledge to the fullest extent the papal
power of granting dispensations, and was ready to submit
to the justice of the Pope as the highest justice upon
earth. But this was solely on condition that the Pope
gave decision according to his wishes. He regarded the
Papacy as an excellent institution so long as it was on
his own side. If it refused to see the justice of his
pleas, then he fell back as strenuously as did Luther on
the necessity of satisfying his own conscience, and to do
so he was ready, if need were, to break with the Church.
Truly the movement in Germany had affected public
opinion more than was supposed when Wolsey could
hold such language to the Pope. He did not know what
a terrible reality that curious conscience of Henry would
become. His words were a truer prophecy than he
dreamed.</p>
<p>However, this line of argument was stubbornly pursued
by Gardiner even in the Pope's presence. Clement
at Orvieto was not surrounded by the pomp and
splendour customary to his office. The English envoys
found him in a little room, seated on a wooden bench
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_163" id="Page_163">{163}</SPAN></span>
which was covered with "an old coverlet not worth
twenty pence." But he did not see his way to a restoration
of his dignity by an unhesitating compliance with
the demands of the English king; on the other hand,
the mere fact that his fortunes had sunk so low demanded
greater circumspection. He was not likely to
escape from dependence on Charles V. by making himself
the tool of Francis I. and Henry VIII.; such a proceeding
would only lead to the entire destruction of the
papal authority. Its restoration must be achieved by
holding the balance between the opposing Powers of
Europe, and Henry VIII.'s desire for a divorce gave the
Pope an opportunity of showing that he was still a personage
of some importance. Dynastic questions still
depended on his decree, and he could use Henry's
application as a means of showing Charles that he
had something to fear from the Papacy, and that it
was his policy to make the Papacy friendly to himself.
So Clement resolved to adopt a congenial course of
temporising, in the hope that he might see his advantage
in some turn of affairs. No doubt he thought that
Henry's matter would soon settle itself; either his passion
for Anne Boleyn would pass away, or he would make
her his mistress. The stubbornness of Henry, his strange
hold upon formal morality while pursuing an immoral
course of conduct, his imperious selfwill, which grew by
opposition—these were incalculable elements which might
have upset the plans of wiser men than Clement VII.</p>
<p>So the Pope acted the part of the good simple man
who wishes to do what is right. He lamented his own
ignorance, and proposed to consult those who were more
learned in canon law than himself. When Gardiner
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_164" id="Page_164">{164}</SPAN></span>
said that England asked nothing but justice, and if it
were refused would be driven to think that God had taken
away from the Holy See the key of knowledge, and
would begin to adopt the opinion of those who thought
that pontifical laws, which were not clear to the
Pope himself, might well be committed to the flames,
Clement sighed, and suggested a compromise. Then he
added, with a smile, that though canonists said "the
Pope has all laws in the cabinet of his breast," yet God
had not given him the key to open that cabinet; he
could only consult his cardinals.</p>
<p>Gardiner's outspoken remonstrances were useless
against one who pleaded an amiable incompetence.
Against the churnings of Henry's conscience Clement
set up the churnings of his own conscience, and no
one could gainsay the Pope's right to a conscience as
much as the English king. After pursuing this course
during the month of March the Pope at length with
sighs and tears devised a compromise, in which he feared
that he had outstepped the bounds of discretion. He
accepted one of the documents which the English envoys
had brought, the permission for the king to marry whom
he would as soon as his marriage with Katharine had
been dissolved. He altered the terms of the other
document, which provided for the appointment of a commission
with plenary powers to pronounce on the validity
of the king's marriage; he granted the commission, but
did not give it plenary power; at the same time he chose
as the commissioner who was to sit with Wolsey Cardinal
Campeggio, who was the protector of England in the
Papal Court, and who was rewarded for his services by
holding the bishopric of Hereford. In this way he
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_165" id="Page_165">{165}</SPAN></span>
showed every mark of goodwill to Henry short of acquiescing
entirely in the procedure which he proposed;
but he kept the final decision of the matter in his own
hands.</p>
<p>Gardiner was not wholly pleased with this result of
his skill and firmness: after all his efforts to obtain a
definite solution the Pope had managed to escape from
giving any binding promise. Still, Foxe put a good
face on Gardiner's exploits when he returned to England
in the end of April. Henry and Anne Boleyn were
delighted, and Wolsey, though he was more dissatisfied
than Gardiner, thought it best to be hopeful. He tried
to bind the Pope more firmly, and instructed Gardiner
to press that the law relating to Henry's case should be
laid down in a papal decretal, so that the legates should
only have to determine the question of fact; this decretal
he promised to keep entirely secret; besides this, he urged
that there should be no delay in sending Campeggio.</p>
<p>During these months of expectancy Wolsey condescended
to ingratiate himself with Anne Boleyn, who had
become a political personage of the first importance.
Anne was sure of Wolsey's devotion to her interests so
long as they were also the king's, and could not dispense
with Wolsey's skill. So she was kindly, and wrote
friendly letters to Wolsey, and asked for little gifts of
tunny-fish and shrimps. The English Court again
resembled an amiable family party, whose members
were all of one mind. In the course of the summer
they were all thrown into terror by an outbreak
of the "Sweating Sickness," which devastated the
country. Anne Boleyn was attacked, though not
severely; and Henry showed that his devotion to her
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_166" id="Page_166">{166}</SPAN></span>
did not proceed to the length of risking his own precious
life for her sake. He fled to Waltham, and Anne was
left with her father; Henry protested by letter his unalterable
affection, but kept out of harm's way till all
risk of infection was past. At the same time he showed
great solicitude for Wolsey's health, as did also Anne
Boleyn. It seemed as though Wolsey were never more
useful or more highly esteemed.</p>
<p>Yet, strangely enough, this outbreak of the plague
drew upon Wolsey the most significant lesson which he
had yet received of his own real position and of Henry's
resoluteness to brook no check upon his royal will.
Amongst others who perished in the sickness was the
Abbess of Wilton, and Anne Boleyn wished that the
vacant office should be given to one of the nuns of the
abbey, Eleanor Carey, sister of William Carey, who had
married Anne's sister Mary. Wolsey was informed of
the wishes of Anne and of the king on this point; but
on examination found that Eleanor's life and character
were not such as to fit her for the office. He therefore
proposed to confer it on the prioress, Isabella Jordan.
It would seem, however, that Eleanor's friends were
determined to efface in some degree the scandal which
their unwise haste had occasioned, and they retaliated
by spreading reports injurious to the character of the
prioress. Wolsey did not believe these reports; but
Anne Boleyn and the king agreed that if their nominee
was to be set aside, the cardinal's nominee should be set
aside likewise, and Wolsey was informed of the king's
decision. Perhaps Wolsey failed to understand the
secret motives which were at work; perhaps he had so
far committed himself before receiving the king's message
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_167" id="Page_167">{167}</SPAN></span>
that he could not well go back; perhaps he conscientiously
did what he thought right. Anyhow, he
appointed Isabella Jordan, and sent her appointment to
the king for confirmation; further, he gave as his excuse
that he had not understood the king's will in the matter.</p>
<p>To his extreme surprise and mortification the king
took the opportunity thus afforded of reading him a
lecture on his presumption, and reminding him that he
was expected to render implicit obedience. Matters
were no longer arranged between Henry and Wolsey
alone; Anne Boleyn was a third party, and the king's
pride was engaged in showing her that his word was
law. When Henry took his pen in hand he assumed
the mantle of royal dignity, and he now gave Wolsey a
sample of the royal way of putting things which was so
effectual in his later dealings with his Parliament. He
began by assuring Wolsey that the great love he bore
him led him to apply the maxim, "Whom I love I
chasten;" he spoke therefore not in displeasure but for
Wolsey's good. He could not but be displeased that
Wolsey had acted contrary to his orders; he was the
more displeased that Wolsey had pleaded ignorance as
an excuse for his disobedience. He overwhelmed him
with quotations from his letters on the subject, and went
on, "Ah, my lord, it is a double offence both to do ill
and colour it too; but with men that have wit it cannot be
accepted so. Wherefore, good my lord, use no more that
way with me, for there is no man living that more hateth
it." He then went on to tell Wolsey that there were many
rumours current about the means which he was employing
to raise money from religious houses for the foundation
of his new colleges; he told him this because "I
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_168" id="Page_168">{168}</SPAN></span>
dare be bolder with you than many that mumble it
abroad." He showed that he had not forgotten the
refusal of the monasteries to help in the Amicable
Grant: why should they now give money to Wolsey unless
they had some interested motive in doing so? He
advised Wolsey to look closely into the matter, and
ended, "I pray you, my lord, think not that it is upon
any displeasure that I write this unto you. For surely
it is for my discharge afore God, being in the room that
I am in; and secondly, for the great zeal I bear unto
you, not undeserved on your behalf. Wherefore, I
pray you, take it so; and I assure you, your fault
acknowledged, there shall remain in me no spark of displeasure;
trusting hereafter you shall recompense that
with a thing much more acceptable to me."</p>
<p>This letter came upon Wolsey as a sudden revelation
of his true position. It showed him the reality of all the
vague doubts and fears which he had for some time been
striving to put from him. He was crushed into abjectness,
which he did not even strive to conceal from others.
He took the immediate matters of complaint seriously
to heart, and wished to annul the appointment of Isabella
Jordan, which the king ruled to be unnecessary;
on that point he was satisfied with having asserted a
principle. But he advised Wolsey to receive no more
gifts for his colleges from religious houses, and Wolsey
promised not to do so. "Thereby I trust, nor by any
other thing hereafter unlawfully taken, your poor
cardinal's conscience shall not be spotted, encumbered,
or entangled; purposing, with God's help and your
gracious favour, so to order the rest of my poor life that
it shall appear to your Highness that I love and dread
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_169" id="Page_169">{169}</SPAN></span>
God and also your Majesty." This was a lamentable
prostration of the moral authority of the chief churchman
in England before the king, and showed Wolsey's weakness.
He knew that he had not demeaned himself as
befitted his priestly office; and though he may have felt
that no man in England had less right than the king to
reprove his conduct on moral grounds, still he could not
plead that he was above reproach. In the particular
matter of which he was accused—extorting money from
the religious houses in return for immunities granted in
virtue of his legatine power—there is no evidence that
Wolsey was guilty. But he could not say that he had a
conscience void of offence; he had acted throughout his
career as a statesman and a man of the world. If the
king chose to hold him up to moral reprobation he
had no valid defence to offer. He had disregarded the
criticisms of others that he might serve the king more
faithfully; but if the king took upon himself the office
of critic he had nothing to urge. It was because Henry
had taken the measure of churchmen such as Wolsey
that he ventured in later times to hold such lofty language
in addressing the clergy. Henry was always superior
to the weakness of imagining that his own conduct
needed any defence, or his own motives any justification.</p>
<p>Wolsey, though forgiven with royal graciousness,
was profoundly depressed, and could not recover his
sense of security. The future was to him big with
menaces, and perhaps he looked most sadly upon his
designs which yet remained unrealised. He saw that his
activity must henceforth work in a smaller sphere, and
that he must make haste to finish what he had on hand.
The ugly business of the divorce looked to him still uglier.
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_170" id="Page_170">{170}</SPAN></span>
Either he would fail in his efforts to move the Pope,
in which case he lost his hold upon the king at once, or,
if he succeeded, he saw that the reign of Anne Boleyn
meant the end of his own uncontested influence. The
king's letter was at least significant of that: he would
never have raised a question about so trivial a matter if
he had not wished to justify his absolute power in the
eyes of one who was to him all-important.</p>
<p>So Wolsey faced the future; he put his aspirations
on a lower level, and wished only to garner certainly
some of the fruits of his life-long labour. He told the
French ambassador, Du Bellay, "that if God permitted
him to see the hatred of these two nations (France and
England) extinguished, and firm amity established, as
he hopes it will shortly be, with a reform of the laws
and customs of the country, such as he would effect if
peace were made, and the succession of the kingdom
assured, especially if this marriage took place, and an
heir male were born of it, he would at once retire, and
serve God for the rest of his life; and that, without any
doubt, on the first honourable occasion he could find, he
would give up politics." Doubtless Wolsey was genuine
in these utterances, and felt that he was resigning much
when he reduced his designs within the limits which he
here set forth. But limited as they were, they still contained
an entire scheme for the reconstruction of English
politics. Wolsey's plans remained complete, however
much he might be willing to reduce them; he was incapable
of being a mere attendant upon chance.</p>
<p>For the present he was awaiting with growing anxiety
the coming of Cardinal Campeggio, which was delayed,
according to the Pope's policy of procrastination. First
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_171" id="Page_171">{171}</SPAN></span>
the cardinal had to contend against the difficulties created
by the disorderly state of Italy; then he was delayed by
an attack of the gout, which made his movements slow;
and he did not reach London till 8th October. When
he came he was not prepared to act at once, nor did he
treat Wolsey as an equal but rather as a subordinate in
the work of the commission. In fact, Campeggio behaved
as judge, and Wolsey as the king's advocate. Campeggio's
instructions were first to try and persuade the
king to lay aside his purpose of a divorce. He soon saw
that this was useless, and Wolsey plainly warned him
with prophetic instinct. "Most reverend lord, beware
lest, in like manner as the greater part of Germany,
owing to the harshness and severity of a certain cardinal,
has become estranged from the Apostolic See and the
faith, it should be said that another cardinal has given
the same occasion to England, with the same result."</p>
<p>Failing to shake the king's determination, the next
course which Campeggio was ordered to pursue was to
persuade the queen to comply with the king's wishes.
Katharine was still treated with outward respect, but was
cut off from all friends and advisers, and subjected to a
secret and galling persecution. Still she maintained a
resolute spirit, and withstood the pleadings of Wolsey
and Campeggio, who urged her to give way and withdraw
to a monastery, for the quieting of the king's
conscience. Katharine replied that there was nothing of
which his conscience need be afraid, and that she intended
"to live and die in the estate of matrimony to
which God had called her." The obstinacy of Katharine
was as invincible as the obstinacy of Henry; and Katharine
had right on her side.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_172" id="Page_172">{172}</SPAN></span>
Nothing remained save for the legates to proceed to
the trial of the case; and in the trial Campeggio's
instructions bade him procrastinate to the utmost in
hopes the king might give way before the long delay.
Wolsey had foreseen this possibility when he demanded
that Campeggio should bring with him a decretal defining
the law as applicable to the case. This decretal
Campeggio was instructed to show the king, but keep in
his own hands, so that it was useless for Wolsey's purpose.
His first object was to get hold of this decretal,
and he wrote urgently to the Pope asking that it should
be delivered into the king's hands, and shown to the
Privy Council. "Without the Pope's compliance," he
sadly wrote, "I cannot bear up against this storm." But
Clement VII. felt that he was more dependent on Charles
V. than on Henry VIII., and declared that he had granted
the decretal merely to be shown to the king and then
burned; he had never consented that it be shown to the
king's counsellors. When he was further pressed he
tossed his arms and said, with great agitation, "I do
consider the ruin that hangs over me; I repent what I
have done. If heresies arise, is it my fault? My conscience
acquits me. None of you have any reason to
complain. I have performed my promise, and the king
and the cardinal have never asked anything in my power
which I have not granted with the utmost readiness; but
I will do no violence to my conscience. Let them, if
they like, send the legate back again, on the pretext that
he will not proceed in the cause, and then do as they
please, provided they do not make me responsible for
injustice."</p>
<p>Here the Pope touched upon a noticeable feature of
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_173" id="Page_173">{173}</SPAN></span>
the case. Henry was bound upon a course which
was neither legally nor morally right, though national
interests might to some degree be pleaded in its behalf.
He was, however, resolved to be legally and morally
justified in his own eyes and in the eyes of others. He
would not content himself with setting aside the law,
and leaving it to others to prove him in the wrong. The
Papal Court was slow to justify him; it would have
been slower to condemn him. Most men would have
been satisfied with this knowledge, and would have
acted upon it. But Henry was not only minded to do
what he wished, but was resolved that what he wished
should be declared absolutely right. He was determined
that there should be no doubt about the legitimacy of
his children by Anne Boleyn; and some recognition is
due to him for not allowing his desires to overcome his
patriotism, and leave to England the deplorable legacy
of a disputed succession. As a man, Henry did not
strive to subject his desires to the law of right; as a
king, he was bent upon justifying his own caprice so
that it should not do hurt to his royal office, or offend
his duty to his kingdom. Henry sinned, but he was
bent on sinning royally, and believed that so he could
extenuate his sin.</p>
<p>Not only was Campeggio ordered not to part with
the decretal, but he was bidden to destroy it. Meanwhile
a new feature of the case emerged. It became
known that, besides the bull of dispensation granted to
Henry VII., an ampler brief had been issued in confirmation
of it to Ferdinand of Spain, of which the
original was contained in the Spanish archives. Henry
VIII. insisted on its production, in the hopes of destroying
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_174" id="Page_174">{174}</SPAN></span>
it or casting doubts on its authenticity, and new
negotiations were begun about this brief, which had the
effect of wasting time and deferring the trial of the
case. Further, on Clement VII.'s return to Rome in
May he was attacked by illness, and his death was
reported. Nothing could be done by the legates till
they were assured of his recovery.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Henry was growing more and more impatient,
and made it clear to Wolsey that if the proceedings
did not lead to his divorce all the blame would
be laid at Wolsey's door. Anne Boleyn also began to
suspect Wolsey's good intentions towards herself, and
thought that he was responsible for these repeated delays.
Wolsey could no longer doubt that his all was staked on
the issue of the trial, which at length began at Blackfriars
on 18th June 1529. Katharine appeared, and protested
against the jurisdiction of the court. For the purpose of
deciding this point it was necessary that both parties
should appear in person; and on 21st June Henry and
Katharine both were present. The king demanded
instant judgment for the easing of his conscience;
Katharine first knelt before the king and asked for pity,
then she appealed to Rome, where only the cause could
be decided without partiality or suspicion. The legates
overruled her appeal, and on her non-appearance declared
her contumacious.</p>
<p>The summoning of the king and queen was merely a
formal incident in the procedure of the court, but it
strangely impressed itself upon men's minds. The king,
whom they regarded as the fountain of law, was called
to plead before one of his own subjects and a foreign
priest. Apart from any thought of the question at issue,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_175" id="Page_175">{175}</SPAN></span>
or its rights and wrongs, Englishmen marvelled at this
indignity, and felt that ecclesiastical law was some foreign
thing which they could not fathom. No doubt the impression
then wrought upon their minds accounts in some
measure for the acceptance of the royal supremacy, as
being at least more intelligible than the actual working
of the outworn theory of the supremacy of the Pope.</p>
<p>Moreover, the suppliant attitude of Katharine
awakened a strong feeling of compassion, which on
28th June found expression from the upright Bishop of
Rochester, John Fisher, who appeared to plead Katharine's
cause, and declared himself ready to follow the
example of John the Baptist and lay down his life, if
need be, to maintain the sanctity of matrimony. Others
followed his example, and the signs of some dislike to
the king's proceedings amongst Englishmen encouraged
Campeggio to fall back upon his policy of procrastination,
which the impetuous zeal of Wolsey was striving
to overcome.</p>
<p>Henry grew more and more angry at the signs of
opposition to his will which met him on every side, and
Wolsey had to bear the brunt of the royal wrath.
Cavendish tells how one day Wolsey left the king's
presence and took his barge. The Bishop of Carlisle,
who was with him, remarked that the day was hot.
"Yea," quoth my lord cardinal, "if ye had been as well
chafed as I have been within this hour ye would say it
was very hot." He went home "to his naked bed,"
where in two hours' time he was found by Lord Wiltshire,
who brought a message from the king, bidding
him and Campeggio "repair unto the queen at Bridewell,
into her chamber, to persuade her by their wisdoms,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_176" id="Page_176">{176}</SPAN></span>
advising her to surrender the whole matter unto the
king's hands by her own will and consent, which should
be much better to her honour than to stand to the trial
of law and be condemned, which would seem much to
her slander and defamation." Wolsey vainly complained
of the folly of the lords of the Council in putting such
fancies into the king's head: he was bound to rise and
obey. Sadly he sought Campeggio, and with a sense of
deep humiliation the two judges set out to make another
attempt to browbeat an accused who had already refused
to submit to their judicial authority.</p>
<p>On 23d July it was expected that the court would give
its decision. The king was present in a gallery, and
after the reading of the pleas his counsel demanded
judgment. Campeggio rose and declared that as the
vacation of the Roman courts began at the end of July
and lasted till October, he must follow that custom, and
adjourn the sittings of the court for two months. On
this the Duke of Suffolk slapped the table and exclaimed,
"It was never merry in England whilst we had cardinals
among us." Wolsey was not the man to brook an
insult, especially from one whom he had greatly benefited.
"Sir," he said, "of all men within this realm ye have
least cause to dispraise or be offended at cardinals: for
if I, a simple cardinal, had not been, you should have
had at this present no head upon your shoulders,
wherein you should have a tongue to make any such
report of us, who intend you no manner of displeasure."</p>
<p>But though Wolsey could still wear a bold face when
attacked, he knew that the future was hopeless. His
enemies were daily gaining ground. His place, as the
king's trusted counsellor, was taken by Stephen Gardiner,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_177" id="Page_177">{177}</SPAN></span>
whom he had trained, and who was now the
king's secretary and Anne Boleyn's chief agent. The
old nobles, headed by the Duke of Norfolk, had made
common cause with the relations of Anne Boleyn, and
saw their opportunity of avenging themselves for all the
slights which Wolsey had put upon them. Henry was
unwilling to abandon all hopes of his divorce through
the legatine court, and spared Wolsey for a time; but
Wolsey knew that the ground was slipping from under
him. The Pope resolved to revoke the cause to Rome,
and recall the powers granted to the legates; it required
all Wolsey's efforts to prevent the issue of a citation to
Henry to appear before the Roman court.</p>
<p>Moreover, Wolsey had the additional pang of seeing
all the fruits of his diplomatic activity abandoned before
the absorbing interest of this miserable matter of the
king's domestic life. If there was one object which was
dear to Wolsey's heart, it was to secure England's power
in Europe by a close alliance with France. For this
purpose he had made great sacrifices, and he thought
that he had some claim on Francis I.'s gratitude. Yet
Francis was negotiating for peace with Charles V., and
a conference was being held at Cambrai between his
mother Louise and Charles's aunt Margaret. Wolsey
sorely longed to be present at that conference and protect
the interests of England; but Henry VIII. had no
interest in such matters, and only regarded Wolsey's
wish as a sign that he was lukewarm in his efforts for
the divorce. Moreover, Francis I. defamed him to the
English envoy, the Duke of Suffolk, and did his best to
foster the king's suspicion of Wolsey's zeal in "the
great matter." He knew that to deprive Henry of his
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_178" id="Page_178">{178}</SPAN></span>
acute adviser was the readiest means of hiding his own
proceedings. The conference at Cambrai was an abandonment
of the methods of diplomacy and a return to
the old usages of the days of chivalry. Two women
took counsel together about family affairs, and their
object was to remove domestic difficulties. Really
Francis I. was weary of a profitless warfare, and agreed
to abandon Italy to Charles V. Henry VIII. was appeased
by a transference of the debt of Charles V. to
the shoulders of Francis I., and this promise of more
money seems to have satisfied the English king. Early
in August the peace was signed, and Henry was included
in its provisions. If a testimony were needed
that entirely English diplomacy depended upon Wolsey,
it would be found in Henry's short-sightedness at
this time. He did not try to influence the proceedings
at Cambrai, but allowed himself to be hoodwinked
by Francis I., even in the point about which he was
most interested. The peace of Cambrai left Charles V.
supreme in Italy, and restored in name the authority of
the Pope, which the two sovereigns declared themselves
resolved to maintain. Its practical result was to make
the Pope more anxious to please Charles, who was
now most closely connected with his political interests,
and to free him from the dread of an alliance between
Henry and Francis, which might have brought pressure
to bear upon his action in the divorce. Clement
had now no special motive for trying to conciliate the
English king, and it was clear to all Europe that Wolsey
no longer guided England's policy.</p>
<p>It was not only that Wolsey had failed in the matter
of the divorce, but his failure had brought to light the
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_179" id="Page_179">{179}</SPAN></span>
true nature of the policy which he was pursuing, and
had shown that it was not adapted to the turn which
affairs were taking under the influence of the king's
personal desires. Wolsey had planned a conservative
reform, to be carried out gradually. England, respected
on the Continent, and holding the balance between
France and the Empire, was gradually to assert its
power and independence by setting up a strong monarchy
which should overawe the Papacy, and without
any formal breach with past traditions, should remodel
its ecclesiastical institutions, and put its relations to the
Papacy on a new footing. Henry VIII. had so far
entered into the spirit of this plan as to regard the
existing state of things as of little moment, and his
wishes led him to try and anticipate the future. This
was the most disastrous thing that could have befallen
Wolsey: it is the danger which besets all attempts at
conservative reform. It is hard to train men in the
ideas of future change, and expect them to submit
patiently to present fetters. Henry brusquely demanded
too much from the Pope, and the Pope in his
alarm offered too little. Wolsey tried to mediate, but
he was too closely allied with Henry for the Pope to
trust him, and when his object was clearly seen in a
small matter he was deprived of the means by which he
hoped to win. His method was framed for large operations
on a large field; it was not suited for the petty
task which was suddenly imposed upon him. Yet if it
failed there it was sure to be condemned altogether, and
the future would belong to the more revolutionary forces
which he had been trying to hold in check.</p>
<p>So in proportion as Wolsey failed about the divorce,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_180" id="Page_180">{180}</SPAN></span>
the threads of his different but converging schemes fell
from his hands. What was the profit to Henry of
Wolsey's intricate foreign policy if it did not allow him
to get a divorce when he pleased? Why should he
deal tenderly with the papal authority when it threw
such obstacles in his way? Why should he spare the
Church when its bishops protested against him? Why
should he permit the slow transformation of the monasteries
when with a little trouble their spoil would fall
into his hands? Why should he trust to Wolsey, who
had already failed him in his need, when he had men
like Gardiner, with clear heads about matters of details,
to serve him at his need? Above all, why should
Wolsey's fine-drawn plans stand between him and his
people's affections, and lead him to do what Englishmen
neither understood nor approved? These were the
questions with which Henry was plied. Wolsey had
been only too successful and too consistent. If his
policy was abandoned in aught, it must be abandoned
in all. When Henry let fall Wolsey's foreign policy,
and made no effort to influence the peace of Cambrai,
there was no further need of Wolsey in England's
councils, and his rule was practically at an end.</p>
<p>Still Wolsey was permitted to retain his offices.
Campeggio had not yet departed; something might
still be done. The king had for some time avoided
seeing Wolsey, and was engaged in wandering from
place to place in the company of Anne Boleyn. At
last, in the middle of September, Campeggio prepared
to return to Rome, and accompanied by Wolsey went
to take leave of the king, who was then at Grafton in
Northamptonshire. There they arrived on 19th September,
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_181" id="Page_181">{181}</SPAN></span>
and Campeggio was shown to his room, but Wolsey
was informed that there was no room provided for him.
He was relieved from his astonishment by a groom of
the stole, who said, "I assure you, sir, here is very
little room in this house, scantly sufficient for the king.
However, I beseech your grace to accept mine for a
season." When Wolsey and Campeggio were ushered
into the king's presence they found the lords of the
Council eagerly watching the king's behaviour. If they
expected any signs of the royal displeasure they were
disappointed, as Henry received Wolsey most graciously,
and drew him aside into a window, where he talked
with him privately.</p>
<p>The king dined privately with Anne Boleyn, and
Wolsey dined with the lords of the Council. In course
of conversation he hinted at his own intentions for the
future by saying, "It were well done if the king
would send his chaplains and bishops to their cures and
benefices." The Duke of Norfolk eagerly assented, and
Wolsey went on to say that he would gladly go to his
bishopric of Winchester. Then Norfolk showed his
fears by saying, "Nay, to your see of York, whence
comes both your greatest honour and charge." Already
Wolsey's foes were scheming to remove him as far as
possible from the royal presence.</p>
<p>Every one was eagerly watching and listening for the
smallest indications of the royal pleasure; and Cavendish
was told that Anne Boleyn at dinner with the
king showed her dissatisfaction at Wolsey's kindly reception.
She denounced the cardinal in no measured
terms, but without any immediate result, as after dinner
the king called Wolsey into his private room and talked
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_182" id="Page_182">{182}</SPAN></span>
with him for some time; "the which blanked his
enemies very sore, and made them to stir the coals,
being in doubt what this matter would grow into,
having now none other refuge to trust to but Mistress
Anne, in whom was all their whole and firm trust and
affiance." Wolsey rode off to "Master Empson's house,
called Euston, three miles from Grafton," where he
spent the night, and received a visit from Gardiner,
who was thought to come as a spy; but Wolsey talked
to him about indifferent subjects, and showed that his
sense of personal dignity was still strong.</p>
<p>Next morning he rode early to the Court, and saw
the king for a short time; but Anne Boleyn had prepared
a picnic at Hatwell Park, and carried off Henry with
her, that Wolsey might not have much opportunity for
private talk. The king bade a hurried farewell to
Wolsey and Campeggio, and then rode away with Anne,
while the legates returned to London. Campeggio did
not reach Dover till 8th October, and before he was
allowed to embark his luggage was ransacked by the
king's officials.</p>
<p>This extraordinary violation of the privileges of an
ambassador was characteristic of the unscrupulous meanness
to which Henry was now ready to descend. He
hoped to find amongst Campeggio's papers the Pope's
decretal about the law of the divorce. If he had found
it Wolsey might still have been useful. He might have
been compelled to continue the proceedings of the
legatine court, and give judgment in Henry's favour,
sheltering himself under the terms of the commission,
and applying the interpretation of the decretal. In this
way the first measures wrung out of the Pope when he
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_183" id="Page_183">{183}</SPAN></span>
wished to be conciliating might have been used in a
high-handed fashion against the conclusions of his settled
policy. But Campeggio had already been instructed by
the Pope to burn the decretal. Nothing was found as
the result of the search, which only revealed the cardinal's
poverty. He had come to England ill provided, and had
gained nothing from the royal bounty.</p>
<p>This unworthy device seems to have been of Henry's
own devising; and as soon as he heard of its failure
Wolsey's doom was sealed. The king had treated him
graciously, to the dismay even of Anne Boleyn, a few
days before; now he abandoned him to his enemies,
who had their weapons of attack in readiness. On 9th
October the king's attorney sued for a writ of <i>præmunire</i>
against Wolsey, on the ground that his acts done as
legate were contrary to the statute. After this Wolsey's
ruin was a foregone conclusion.</p>
<div class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_184" id="Page_184">{184}</SPAN></div>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />