<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[138]</SPAN></span></p>
<h2>LESSON XXVI</h2>
<h3>TRAINING NEW LEADERS</h3>
<p>The emphasis which the Pastoral Epistles lay upon sound instruction
and upon orderly government is sometimes looked upon
with distaste. Orthodoxy and organization are thought to be destructive
of religious fervor. In the New Testament, however, the
two aspects of the Church's life appear side by side. In the New
Testament, enthusiasm and sanity are united. And the New
Testament is right. Religion is a concern of every individual soul—the
final decision must be made by every man in the immediate
presence of his God—but normally no man can do without association
with his fellows. The Church is a great permanent community.
It is not merely an aggregation, but an institution. To break away
from its restraints may be attractive, it may produce a certain
temporary impression of zeal and new life; but in the long run the
old way is usually best.</p>
<p>The Pastoral Epistles, however, are sometimes thought to indicate
an unfortunate change in Paul himself as well as in the Church.
Some students would prefer to know only the Paul of Galatians and
Corinthians and Romans. This judgment is one-sided. The
Pastorals do not contradict, but supplement, the earlier letters.
The earlier period, no doubt, is the more inspiring; there is nothing
in the Pastoral Epistles like the first few chapters of First Corinthians,
or the fifth chapter of Second Corinthians, or the eighth chapter
of Romans. These passages are overpowering in the intensity
of their eloquence; the later letters are soberer, graver, more
matter-of-fact. These latter qualities, however, are much needed
in the Church. The Church needs enthusiasm; but she also needs
gravity and sanity. Her function is not merely evangelistic; it
is also conservative and educational. In both functions Paul was a
leader. The quiet gravity of the Pastoral Epistles supplements the
glories of Galatians and Romans. Only when these last epistles are
added to the others can the many-sided greatness of Paul be fully
appreciated. Exaggerations, moreover, should be avoided. The
soberness of the Pastorals is not commonplace. Back of the details
of organization, back of the concern for sound instruction, there can<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[139]</SPAN></span>
be detected throughout the glow of the Pauline gospel. The Pastoral
Epistles, like the other letters of Paul, are a perennial fountain
of Christian life.</p>
<p>The Second Epistle to Timothy was clearly the last of the extant
epistles of Paul; but the order of First Timothy and Titus cannot be
certainly determined. The difficulty of reconstructing the history
implied by the Pastoral Epistles reveals anew the supreme value
of The Acts. After the conclusion of the Lucan narrative the
historian is almost helpless. From about A. D. 63 on into the second
century, the history of the Church is shrouded in profound darkness,
with gleams of light only here and there.</p>
<h4>1. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO TIMOTHY</h4>
<p>At the time when First Timothy was written, Paul had recently
made a journey to Macedonia. I Tim. 1:3. Perhaps he had gone
thither from Ephesus, though the words do not make that perfectly
clear. At any rate, he had directed Timothy to remain in Ephesus,
where he hoped to join him before long. In case of delay, however,
he writes the epistle. Chs. 3:14,15; 4:13.</p>
<p>On a previous occasion, perhaps by word of mouth when he had
been in Ephesus, he had warned Timothy to put a stop to certain
false teaching in the Church, and the warning is now reiterated in
the epistle. The exact nature of this teaching is somewhat difficult
to determine. Apparently it had been concerned with the Jewish
law. Ch. 1:7-11. Compare Titus 1:10,14. Like the false
teaching at Colossæ, it seems not to have been directly subversive
of the truth of the gospel. At least, however, it diverted attention
from the great things of the faith to useless questionings. I Tim.
6:4. The myths and endless genealogies, ch. 1:4, compare 4:7,
were perhaps elaborations of the Old Testament history. Whether
the ascetic tendency which is combated in ch. 4:3,8, is connected
with this same teaching, is not certain, but is on the whole perhaps
probable.</p>
<p>The first reference to the false teaching, ch. 1:3-10, leads Paul to
speak of the norm by which it could be combated. Vs. 11-20. That
norm was the gospel with which he had been intrusted. The
bestowal of the gospel had changed him from a blasphemer and
persecutor into an apostle. The gospel had been bestowed purely
by the free grace of Christ, and its content was the salvation which
Christ offers. A doxology to God, v. 17, is natural whenever that
gospel is mentioned. That gospel will overcome all error, and if<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[140]</SPAN></span>
attended to diligently will prevent disasters like that which has
befallen Hymenæus and Alexander.</p>
<p>In the second chapter, Paul insists upon gravity and order in the
public worship of the Church. In the prayers which are to be
offered, the civil authority is not to be forgotten, even though it be
non-Christian. The sympathies of the Christian must be broad.
God desires all men to come to a knowledge of the truth.</p>
<p>The highest regular officers of the Church are in the third chapter
called "bishops." It is abundantly evident, however—especially
from Titus 1:5,7—that "bishop" is only another name for "presbyter"
or "elder." At a later time the term "bishop" was applied to
an officer who had the supreme oversight over a church and to
whom the elders were subject. These conditions did not prevail
at the time of the Pastoral Epistles. At first sight, indeed, it
might seem as though Timothy and Titus themselves were "bishops"
in the later sense of the word. But this also is false. Timothy and
Titus do not appear at all as officers of individual congregations.
They had oversight over a plurality of churches, and evidently
their authority was special and temporary. They did not fill an
office which was intended to become permanent in the Church, but
were simply special representatives of the apostle. As the apostles
had no successors, so no man after the apostolic age had a right to
assume the functions of Timothy and Titus.</p>
<p>The fourth chapter calls attention to the revelation of the Holy
Spirit, probably through the lips of Christian prophets, that in the
future there would appear apostates from the faith. The errorists
who are combated in vs. 7-10 are apparently to be regarded as forerunners,
still within the Church, of the more open apostasy which is
one day to follow.</p>
<p>The institution of the "widows," which is discussed in the fifth
chapter, is to us somewhat obscure. Evidently those who were
accounted "widows," being helpless, were entitled to support by the
church. The necessity of sound teaching, with emphasis upon the
really fundamental things of the faith, is again insisted upon; and
certain false teachers are accused of practicing or inculcating piety
as a means of worldly gain. Ch. 6:3-10. The last warning of the
epistle characteristically concerns vain babblings and oppositions
of a so-called knowledge. Probably these errors are connected in
some way with those which are combated in the first section of the
epistle. In the final words, "Grace be with you," the "you" in the
Greek, according to the best attestation, is plural; and in the corresponding<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[141]</SPAN></span>
passages at the end of Titus and of Second Timothy, it
is certainly plural. This may furnish an indication—to be added
to more general considerations—that the Pastoral Epistles were
intended not merely for those to whom they are formally addressed,
but also to the churches under their care.</p>
<h4>2. THE EPISTLE TO TITUS</h4>
<p>The address of the Epistle to Titus is noteworthy for the long
addition to the title of the author, which is to be compared with the
similar addition in Romans.</p>
<p>At the time when the epistle was written, Paul had recently been
with Titus in Crete. Paul had not labored on that island before the
first Roman imprisonment. His journeys in the east between the
two imprisonments therefore involved something more than the
revisitation of former fields. The reason why Titus was left behind
in Crete was somewhat similar to the reason why Timothy, according
to First Timothy, was told to remain in Ephesus. Titus was to
give attention to organization, and to the maintenance of sound
instruction.</p>
<p>Like Timothy, Titus is given the power of establishing presbyters,
and of establishing them not merely in one church but in various
churches. The function of the presbyter was that of "bishop" or
"overseer." Titus 1:5-7. In vs. 9-16, the close connection of
organization with sound doctrine becomes particularly apparent.
One important function of the presbyters was to counteract the
errors which were springing up. The account of the errorists in
Crete is perhaps in some respects clearer than that which is given
of the related phenomenon in Ephesus. The false teachers were
animated by a love of gain. V. 11. Some of them were Jews or
proselytes. V. 10. They had a fondness for Jewish fables. Apparently,
also, they tried to atone for a lack of real inward purity
by an outward asceticism. Vs. 15, 16. They were concerned with
vain questionings and genealogies and legal disputes. These last
are perhaps to be regarded as casuistic discussions like those which
play such a large part in Jewish tradition.</p>
<p>The Epistle to Titus is somewhat richer than First Timothy in
personal details. After Titus has been relieved in Crete by Artemas
or Tychicus, who may soon be sent, he is to join Paul in Nicopolis.
Tychicus, it will be remembered, had served as Paul's messenger
during the first imprisonment. He was the bearer of Colossians
and Ephesians. The Nicopolis where Paul is intending to pass the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[142]</SPAN></span>
approaching winter, is probably the chief of the many cities of that
name, the Nicopolis in Epirus. Zenas, a lawyer otherwise unknown,
and the well-known Apollos, who appears so prominently in The
Acts and in First Corinthians, are to be furnished in Crete with
everything that they need for their further journey.</p>
<h4>3. THE SECOND EPISTLE TO TIMOTHY</h4>
<p>The First Epistle to Timothy and the Epistle to Titus are in
many respects strikingly similar. A certain strong family resemblance
extends also to Second Timothy. Evidently all three of the
Pastoral Epistles belong to the same general period of Paul's life,
and were intended to subserve similar purposes. Second Timothy,
however, as compared with the other two, exhibits some marked
peculiarities.</p>
<p>The personal element, in particular, is in this letter much more
prominent. Second Timothy contains a wealth of interesting
biographical details about Timothy, about Paul, and about a very
considerable number of other persons. Some of these last are known
only from this epistle; others have been brought to our attention
again and again.</p>
<p>In Second Timothy Paul appears as a prisoner, no doubt at Rome.
This time there seems to be little hope of his release. Apparently
his imprisonment is not of long standing. Only recently he has
been at Corinth and at Miletus. II Tim. 4:20. He speaks in one
place of his first defense. V. 16. Some suppose that this is a
reminiscence of the trial which had taken place years before, during
the first imprisonment. More probably it refers to some preliminary
hearing which had only recently been held. Paul is
oppressed with a sense of loneliness, even more than during the
first imprisonment. There was no one to stand by him at his first
hearing. For one reason or another, his intimate associates have
been scattered—some of them, no doubt, for good and sufficient
reasons, but Demas, at any rate, out of an unworthy love of the
world. Luke, fortunately, is still with him; and Timothy, with
Mark, is urged to come before the winter. Vs. 11, 21. Mark
seems to have changed since he turned back from the work at Perga.
At the beginning he was rebuked for desertion; but now at the end
he is one of the few faithful ones.</p>
<p>It is not quite clear where Timothy was when the letter was
addressed to him. The greeting to Priscilla and Aquila might
seem to point to Ephesus. They had lived there before; perhaps<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[143]</SPAN></span>
they returned thither after a residence in Rome. Rom. 16:3.
If Timothy was in Ephesus, then Tychicus, who was sent thither,
II Tim. 4:12, was probably expected to linger by the way; otherwise
his sending would be no news to the reader of the letter.
Something is to be said, perhaps, for the view that Timothy was
not at Ephesus, but perhaps at Lystra, his original home.</p>
<p>The Second Epistle to Timothy contains warnings against false
teaching similar to those which appear in First Timothy and Titus.
But the characteristic feature of the letter is to be found in the
references to the apostle's own life. Even the warnings and admonitions
are brought into relation to these. Paul does not
hesitate to point to himself as an example for his beloved followers.
He does so, without a touch of vain glory, in the simple consciousness
of a divine commission. Second Timothy is a letter of farewell, in
which reminiscence and exhortation are characteristically blended.
It is a farewell from the apostle, primarily for Timothy, though he
is expecting to see Timothy again, but also for all of the Pauline
churches. The letter has taken deep hold of every generation in
the history of the Church. The fitting end of a life of true service,
the calm facing of death, the certainty of heavenly communion
with the Lord—these are the things above all others that have
been learned from the last of the epistles of Paul.</p>
<hr class="tb" />
<p><span class="smcap">In the Library.</span>—Purves, "Christianity in the Apostolic Age,"
pp. 252-261. Davis, "Dictionary of the Bible": Purves, articles on
"Timothy" and "Titus." M'Clymont, "The New Testament and Its
Writers," pp. 104-115. Lewin, "The Life and Epistles of St. Paul,"
vol. ii, chs. vii, viii, ix, x and xi. Conybeare and Howson, "The Life
and Epistles of St. Paul," ch. xxvii. Stalker, "The Life of St. Paul,"
pp. 133-136. Warfield, "Acts, Timothy, Titus and Philemon," in "The
Temple Bible," pp. xxvii-xliii. Ellicott, "A New Testament Commentary
for English Readers," vol. iii, pp. 171-264: Spence, "The Pastoral Epistles
of St. Paul." "The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges": Humphreys,
"The Epistles to Timothy and Titus." Zahn, "Introduction
to the New Testament," vol. ii, pp. 1-133. The last named work is
intended primarily for those who have some knowledge of Greek, but
can also be used by others.</p>
<hr class="chap" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_144" id="Page_144"> </SPAN><br/><SPAN name="Page_145" id="Page_145"> </SPAN></span></p>
<h2>PART III:</h2>
<p class="center">The Presentation and Defense of<br/>
Christianity</p>
<hr class="chap" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />