<h2><SPAN name="page255"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>THE OVERSIGHT</h2>
<p>“It’s like a Chinese puzzle,” said Lady
Prowche resentfully, staring at a scribbled list of names that
spread over two or three loose sheets of notepaper on her
writing-table. Most of the names had a pencil mark running
through them.</p>
<p>“What is like a Chinese puzzle?” asked Lena
Luddleford briskly; she rather prided herself on being able to
grapple with the minor problems of life.</p>
<p>“Getting people suitably sorted together. Sir
Richard likes me to have a house party about this time of year,
and gives me a free hand as to whom I should invite; all he asks
is that it should be a peaceable party, with no friction or
unpleasantness.”</p>
<p>“That seems reasonable enough,” said Lena.</p>
<p>“Not only reasonable, my dear, but necessary. Sir
Richard has his literary work to think of; you can’t expect
a man to concentrate on the tribal disputes of Central Asian
clansmen when he’s got social feuds blazing under his own
roof.”</p>
<p>“But why should they blaze? Why should there be
feuds at all within the compass of a house party?”</p>
<p>“Exactly; why should they blaze or why should they
exist?” echoed Lady Prowche; “the point is that they
always do. We have been unlucky; persistently unlucky, now
that I come to look back on things. We have always got
people of violently opposed views under one roof, and the result
has been not merely unpleasantness but explosion.”</p>
<p>“Do you mean people who disagree on matters of political
opinion and religious views?” asked Lena.</p>
<p>“No, not that. The broader lines of political or
religious difference don’t matter. You can have
Church of England and Unitarian and Buddhist under the same roof
without courting disaster; the only Buddhist I ever had down here
quarrelled with everybody, but that was on account of his
naturally squabblesome temperament; it had nothing to do with his
religion. And I’ve always found that people can
differ profoundly about politics and meet on perfectly good terms
at breakfast. Now, Miss Larbor Jones, who was staying here
last year, worships Lloyd George as a sort of wingless angel,
while Mrs. Walters, who was down here at the same time, privately
considers him to be—an antelope, let us say.”</p>
<p>“An antelope?”</p>
<p>“Well, not an antelope exactly, but something with horns
and hoofs and tail.”</p>
<p>“Oh, I see.”</p>
<p>“Still, that didn’t prevent them from being the
chummiest of mortals on the tennis court and in the
billiard-room. They did quarrel finally, about a lead in a
doubled hand of no-trumps, but that of course is a thing that no
account of judicious guest-grouping could prevent. Mrs.
Walters had got king, knave, ten, and seven of
clubs—”</p>
<p>“You were saying that there were other lines of
demarcation that caused the bother,” interrupted Lena.</p>
<p>“Exactly. It is the minor differences and
side-issues that give so much trouble,” said Lady Prowche;
“not to my dying day shall I forget last year’s
upheaval over the Suffragette question. Laura Henniseed
left the house in a state of speechless indignation, but before
she had reached that state she had used language that would not
have been tolerated in the Austrian Reichsrath. Intensive
bear-gardening was Sir Richard’s description of the whole
affair, and I don’t think he exaggerated.”</p>
<p>“Of course the Suffragette question is a burning one,
and lets loose the most dreadful ill-feeling,” said Lena;
“but one can generally find out beforehand what
people’s opinions—”</p>
<p>“My dear, the year before it was worse. It was
Christian Science. Selina Goobie is a sort of High
Priestess of the Cult, and she put down all opposition with a
high hand. Then one evening, after dinner, Clovis Sangrail
put a wasp down her back, to see if her theory about the
non-existence of pain could be depended on in an emergency.
The wasp was small, but very efficient, and it had been soured in
temper by being kept in a paper cage all the afternoon.
Wasps don’t stand confinement well, at least this one
didn’t. I don’t think I ever realised till that
moment what the word ‘invective’ could be made to
mean. I sometimes wake in the night and think I still hear
Selina describing Clovis’s conduct and general
character. That was the year that Sir Richard was writing
his volume on ‘Domestic Life in Tartary.’ The
critics all blamed it for a lack of concentration.”</p>
<p>“He’s engaged on a very important work this year,
isn’t he?” asked Lena.</p>
<p>“‘Land-tenure in Turkestan,’” said
Lady Prowche; “he is just at work on the final chapters and
they require all the concentration he can give them. That
is why I am so very anxious not to have any unfortunate
disturbance this year. I have taken every precaution I can
think of to bring non-conflicting and harmonious elements
together; the only two people I am not quite easy about are the
Atkinson man and Marcus Popham. They are the two who will
be down here longest together, and if they are going to fall foul
of one another about any burning question, well, there will be
more unpleasantness.”</p>
<p>“Can’t you find out anything about them?
About their opinions, I mean.”</p>
<p>“Anything? My dear Lena, there’s scarcely
anything that I haven’t found out about them.
They’re both of them moderate Liberal, Evangelical, mildly
opposed to female suffrage, they approve of the Falconer Report,
and the Stewards’ decision about Craganour. Thank
goodness in this country we don’t fly into violent passions
about Wagner and Brahms and things of that sort. There is
only one thorny subject that I haven’t been able to make
sure about, the only stone that I have left unturned. Are
they unanimously anti-vivisectionist or do they both uphold the
necessity for scientific experiment? There has been a lot
of correspondence on the subject in our local newspapers of late,
and the vicar is certain to preach a sermon about it; vicars are
dreadfully provocative at times. Now, if you could only
find out for me whether these two men are divergently for or
against—”</p>
<p>“I!” exclaimed Lena; “how am I to find
out? I don’t know either of them to speak
to.”</p>
<p>“Still you might discover, in some roundabout way.
Write to them, under as assumed name of course, for subscriptions
to one or other cause—or, better still, send a stamped
type-written reply postcard, with a request for a declaration for
or against vivisection; people who would hesitate to commit
themselves to a subscription will cheerfully write Yes or No on a
prepaid postcard. If you can’t manage it that way,
try and meet them at some one’s house and get into argument
on the subject. I think Milly occasionally has one or other
of them at her at-homes; you might have the luck to meet both of
them there the same evening. Only it must be done
soon. My invitations ought to go out by Wednesday or
Thursday at the latest, and to-day is Friday.</p>
<p>“Milly’s at-homes are not very amusing, as a
rule,” said Lena, “and one never gets a chance of
talking uninterruptedly to any one for a couple of minutes at a
time; Milly is one of those restless hostesses who always seem to
be trying to see how you look in different parts of the room, in
fresh grouping effects. Even if I got to speak to Popham or
Atkinson I couldn’t plunge into a topic like vivisection
straight away. No, I think the postcard scheme would be
more hopeful and decidedly less tiresome. How would it be
best to word them?”</p>
<p>“Oh, something like this: ‘Are you in favour of
experiments on living animals for the purpose of scientific
research—Yes or No?’ That is quite simple and
unmistakable. If they don’t answer it will at least
be an indication that they are indifferent about the subject, and
that is all I want to know.”</p>
<p>“All right,” said Lena, “I’ll get my
brother-in-law to let me have them addressed to his office, and
he can telephone the result of the plebiscite direct to
you.”</p>
<p>“Thank you ever so much,” said Lady Prowche
gratefully, “and be sure to get the cards sent off as soon
as possible.”</p>
<p>On the following Tuesday the voice of an office clerk,
speaking through the telephone, informed Lady Prowche that the
postcard poll showed unanimous hostility to experiments on living
animals.</p>
<p>Lady Prowche thanked the office clerk, and in a louder and
more fervent voice she thanked Heaven. The two invitations,
already sealed and addressed, were immediately dispatched; in due
course they were both accepted. The house party of the
halcyon hours, as the prospective hostess called it, was
auspiciously launched.</p>
<p>Lena Luddleford was not included among the guests, having
previously committed herself to another invitation. At the
opening day of a cricket festival, however, she ran across Lady
Prowche, who had motored over from the other side of the
county. She wore the air of one who is not interested in
cricket and not particularly interested in life. She shook
hands limply with Lena, and remarked that it was a beastly
day.</p>
<p>“The party, how has it gone off?” asked Lena
quickly.</p>
<p>“Don’t speak of it!” was the tragical
answer; “why do I always have such rotten luck?”</p>
<p>“But what has happened?”</p>
<p>“It has been awful. Hyænas could not have
behaved with greater savagery. Sir Richard said so, and he
has been in countries where hyænas live, so he ought to
know. They actually came to blows!”</p>
<p>“Blows?”</p>
<p>“Blows and curses. It really might have been a
scene from one of Hogarth’s pictures. I never felt so
humiliated in my life. What the servants must have
thought!”</p>
<p>“But who were the offenders?”</p>
<p>“Oh, naturally the very two that we took all the trouble
about.”</p>
<p>“I thought they agreed on every subject that one could
violently disagree about—religion, politics, vivisection,
the Derby decision, the Falconer Report; what else was there left
to quarrel about?”</p>
<p>“My dear, we were fools not to have thought of it.
One of them was Pro-Greek and the other Pro-Bulgar.”</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />