<h2><SPAN name="XXX" id="XXX"></SPAN>XXX</h2>
<br/>
<p><i>Military Governors—Lincoln's Theory of
Reconstruction—Congressional Election in
Louisiana—Letter to Military Governors—Letter to
Shepley—Amnesty Proclamation, December 8,
1863—Instructions to Banks—Banks's Action in
Louisiana—Louisiana Abolishes Slavery—Arkansas
Abolishes Slavery—Reconstruction in Tennessee—Missouri
Emancipation—Lincoln's Letter to Drake—Missouri
Abolishes Slavery—Emancipation in Maryland—Maryland
Abolishes Slavery</i></p>
<br/>
<br/>
<p>To subdue the Confederate armies and establish order under
martial law was not the only task before President Lincoln. As
rapidly as rebel States or portions of States were occupied by
Federal troops, it became necessary to displace usurping
Confederate officials and appoint in their stead loyal State,
county, and subordinate officers to restore the administration of
local civil law under the authority of the United States. In
western Virginia the people had spontaneously effected this reform,
first by repudiating the Richmond secession ordinance and
organizing a provisional State government, and, second, by adopting
a new constitution and obtaining admission to the Union as the new
State of West Virginia. In Missouri the State convention which
refused to pass a secession ordinance effected the same object by
establishing a provisional State government. In both these States
the whole process of what in subsequent years was comprehensively
designated "reconstruction" was carried <SPAN name="page419" id="page419"></SPAN>on by
popular local action, without any Federal initiative or
interference other than prompt Federal recognition and substantial
military support and protection.</p>
<p>But in other seceded States there was no such groundwork of
loyal popular authority upon which to rebuild the structure of
civil government. Therefore, when portions of Tennessee, Louisiana,
Arkansas, and North Carolina came under Federal control, President
Lincoln, during the first half of 1862, appointed military
governors to begin the work of temporary civil administration. He
had a clear and consistent constitutional theory under which this
could be done. In his first inaugural he announced the doctrine
that "the union of these States is perpetual" and "unbroken." His
special message to Congress on July 4, 1861, added the
supplementary declaration that "the States have their status in the
Union, and they have no other legal status." The same message
contained the further definition:</p>
<p>"The people of Virginia have thus allowed this giant
insurrection to make its nest within her borders; and this
government has no choice left but to deal with it where it finds
it. And it has the less regret, as the loyal citizens have, in due
form, claimed its protection. Those loyal citizens this government
is bound to recognize and protect, as being Virginia."</p>
<p>The action of Congress entirely conformed to this theory. That
body admitted to seats senators and representatives from the
provisional State governments of West Virginia and Missouri; and
also allowed Senator Andrew Johnson of Tennessee to retain his
seat, and admitted Horace Maynard and Andrew J. Clements as
representatives from the same State, though since their election
Tennessee had undergone the usual <SPAN name="page420" id="page420"></SPAN>secession usurpation, and
had as yet organized no loyal provisional government.</p>
<p>The progress of the Union armies was so far checked during the
second half of 1862, that Military Governor Phelps, appointed for
Arkansas, did not assume his functions; and Military Governor
Stanley wielded but slight authority in North Carolina. Senator
Andrew Johnson, appointed military governor of Tennessee,
established himself at Nashville, the capital, and, though Union
control of Tennessee fluctuated greatly, he was able, by appointing
loyal State and county officers, to control the administration of
civil government in considerable districts, under substantial
Federal jurisdiction.</p>
<p>In the State of Louisiana the process of restoring Federal
authority was carried on a step farther, owing largely to the fact
that the territory occupied by the Union army, though quite
limited, comprising only the city of New Orleans and a few adjacent
parishes, was more securely held, and its hostile frontier less
disturbed. It soon became evident that considerable Union sentiment
yet existed in the captured city and surrounding districts, and
when some of the loyal citizens began to manifest impatience at the
restraints of martial law, President Lincoln in a frank letter
pointed the way to a remedy:</p>
<p>"The people of Louisiana," he wrote under date of July 28, 1862,
"who wish protection to person and property, have but to reach
forth their hands and take it. Let them in good faith reinaugurate
the national authority and set up a State government conforming
thereto under the Constitution. They know how to do it, and can
have the protection of the army while doing it. The army will be
withdrawn so soon as such State government can dispense with its
presence, and <SPAN name="page421" id="page421"></SPAN>the people of the State can then, upon
the old constitutional terms, govern themselves to their own
liking."</p>
<p>At about this date there occurred the serious military crisis in
Virginia; and the battles of the Peninsula, of the second Bull Run,
and of Antietam necessarily compelled the postponement of minor
questions. But during this period the President's policy on the
slavery question reached its development and solution, and when, on
September 22, he issued his preliminary proclamation of
emancipation, it also paved the way for a further defining of his
policy of reconstruction.</p>
<p>That proclamation announced the penalty of military emancipation
against all States in rebellion on the succeeding first day of
January; but also provided that if the people thereof were
represented in Congress by properly elected members, they should be
deemed not in rebellion, and thereby escape the penalty. Wishing
now to prove the sincerity of what he said in the Greeley letter,
that his paramount object was to save the Union, and not either to
save or destroy slavery, he wrote a circular letter to the military
governors and commanders in Louisiana, Tennessee, and Arkansas,
instructing them to permit and aid the people within the districts
held by them to hold elections for members of Congress, and perhaps
a legislature, State officers, and United States senators.</p>
<p>"In all available ways," he wrote, "give the people a chance to
express their wishes at these elections. Follow forms of law as far
as convenient, but at all events get the expression of the largest
number of the people possible. All see how such action will connect
with and affect the proclamation of September 22. Of course the men
elected should be gentlemen of character, willing to swear support
to the Constitution as of <SPAN name="page422" id="page422"></SPAN>old, and known to be above reasonable
suspicion of duplicity."</p>
<p>But the President wished this to be a real and not a sham
proceeding, as he explained a month later in a letter to Governor
Shepley:</p>
<p>"We do not particularly need members of Congress from there to
enable us to get along with legislation here. What we do want is
the conclusive evidence that respectable citizens of Louisiana are
willing to be members of Congress and to swear support to the
Constitution, and that other respectable citizens there are willing
to vote for them and send them. To send a parcel of Northern men
here as representatives, elected, as would be understood (and
perhaps really so), at the point of the bayonet, would be
disgraceful and outrageous; and were I a member of Congress here, I
would vote against admitting any such man to a seat."</p>
<p>Thus instructed, Governor Shepley caused an election to be held
in the first and second congressional districts of Louisiana on
December 3, 1862, at which members of Congress were chosen. No
Federal office-holder was a candidate, and about one half the usual
vote was polled. The House of Representatives admitted them to
seats after full scrutiny, the chairman of the committee declaring
this "had every essential of a regular election in a time of most
profound peace, with the exception of the fact that the
proclamation was issued by the military instead of the civil
governor of Louisiana."</p>
<p>Military affairs were of such importance and absorbed so much
attention during the year 1863, both at Washington and at the
headquarters of the various armies, that the subject of
reconstruction was of necessity somewhat neglected. The military
governor of Louisiana indeed ordered a registration of loyal
voters, <SPAN name="page423" id="page423"></SPAN>about the middle of June, for the
purpose of organizing a loyal State government; but its only result
was to develop an inevitable antagonism and contest between
conservatives who desired that the old constitution of Louisiana
prior to the rebellion should be revived, by which the institution
of slavery as then existing would be maintained, and the free-State
party which demanded that an entirely new constitution be framed
and adopted, in which slavery should be summarily abolished. The
conservatives asked President Lincoln to adopt their plan. While
the President refused this, he in a letter to General Banks dated
August 5, 1863, suggested the middle course of gradual
emancipation.</p>
<p>"For my own part," he wrote, "I think I shall not, in any event,
retract the emancipation proclamation; nor, as Executive, ever
return to slavery any person who is freed by the terms of that
proclamation, or by any of the acts of Congress. If Louisiana shall
send members to Congress, their admission to seats will depend, as
you know, upon the respective houses and not upon the
President."</p>
<p>"I would be glad for her to make a new constitution recognizing
the emancipation proclamation and adopting emancipation in those
parts of the State to which the proclamation does not apply. And
while she is at it, I think it would not be objectionable for her
to adopt some practical system by which the two races could
gradually live themselves out of their old relation to each other,
and both come out better prepared for the new. Education for young
blacks should be included in the plan. After all, the power or
element of 'contract' may be sufficient for this probationary
period, and by its simplicity and flexibility may be the
better."</p>
<p>During the autumn months the President's mind <SPAN name="page424" id="page424"></SPAN>dwelt
more and more on the subject of reconstruction, and he matured a
general plan which he laid before Congress in his annual message to
that body on December 8, 1863. He issued on the same day a
proclamation of amnesty, on certain conditions, to all persons in
rebellion except certain specified classes, who should take a
prescribed oath of allegiance. The proclamation further provided
that whenever a number of persons so amnestied in any rebel State,
equal to one tenth the vote cast at the presidential election of
1860, should "reëstablish a State government which shall be
republican, and in no wise contravening said oath," such would be
recognized as the true government of the State. The annual message
discussed and advocated the plan at length, but also added: "Saying
that reconstruction will be accepted if presented in a specified
way, it is not said it will never be accepted in any other
way."</p>
<p>This plan of reconstructing what came to be called "ten percent
States," met much opposition in Congress, and that body, reversing
its action in former instances, long refused admission to members
and senators from States similarly organized; but the point needs
no further mention here.</p>
<p>A month before the amnesty proclamation the President had
written to General Banks, expressing his great disappointment that
the reconstruction in Louisiana had been permitted to fall in
abeyance by the leading Union officials there, civil and
military.</p>
<p>"I do, however," he wrote, "urge both you and them to lose no
more time. Governor Shepley has special instructions from the War
Department. I wish him—these gentlemen and others
coöperating—without waiting for more territory, to go to
work and give me a tangible nucleus which the remainder of the
State may <SPAN name="page425" id="page425"></SPAN>rally around as fast as it can, and
which I can at once recognize and sustain as the true State
government."</p>
<p>He urged that such reconstruction should have in view a new
free-State constitution, for, said he:</p>
<p>"If a few professedly loyal men shall draw the disloyal about
them, and colorably set up a State government repudiating the
emancipation proclamation and reëstablishing slavery, I cannot
recognize or sustain their work.... I have said, and say again,
that if a new State government, acting in harmony with this
government and consistently with general freedom, shall think best
to adopt a reasonable temporary arrangement in relation to the
landless and houseless freed people, I do not object; but my word
is out to be for and not against them on the question of their
permanent freedom."</p>
<p>General Banks in reply excused his inaction by explaining that
the military governor and others had given him to understand that
they were exclusively charged with the work of reconstruction in
Louisiana. To this the President rejoined under date of December
24, 1863:</p>
<p>"I have all the while intended you to be master, as well in
regard to reorganizing a State government for Louisiana as in
regard to the military matters of the department, and hence my
letters on reconstruction have nearly, if not quite, all been
addressed to you. My error has been that it did not occur to me
that Governor Shepley or any one else would set up a claim to act
independently of you.... I now distinctly tell you that you are
master of all, and that I wish you to take the case as you find it,
and give us a free-State reorganization of Louisiana in the
shortest possible time."</p>
<p>Under this explicit direction of the President, and <SPAN name="page426" id="page426"></SPAN>basing
his action on martial law as the fundamental law of the State, the
general caused a governor and State officials to be elected on
February 22, 1864. To override the jealousy and quarrels of both
the conservative and free-State parties, he set out in his
proclamation that the officials to be chosen should—</p>
<p>"Until others are appointed by competent authority, constitute
the civil government of the State, under the constitution and laws
of Louisiana, except so much of the said constitution and laws as
recognize, regulate, or relate to slavery; which, being
inconsistent with the present condition of public affairs, and
plainly inapplicable to any class of persons now existing within
its limits, must be suspended, and they are therefore and hereby
declared to be inoperative and void."</p>
<p>The newly elected governor was inaugurated on March 4, with
imposing public ceremonies, and the President also invested him
"with the powers exercised hitherto by the military governor of
Louisiana." General Banks further caused delegates to a State
convention to be chosen, who, in a session extending from April 6
to July 25, perfected and adopted a new constitution, which was
again adopted by popular vote on September 5 following. General
Banks reported the constitution to be "one of the best ever
penned.... It abolishes slavery in the State, and forbids the
legislature to enact any law recognizing property in man. The
emancipation is instantaneous and absolute, without condition or
compensation, and nearly unanimous."</p>
<p>The State of Arkansas had been forced into rebellion by military
terrorism, and remained under Confederate domination only because
the Union armies could afford the latent loyal sentiment of the
State no effective support until the fall of Vicksburg and the
opening of the Mississippi. After that decisive victory,
General<SPAN name="page427" id="page427"></SPAN> Steele marched a Union column of about
thirteen thousand from Helena to Little Rock, the capital, which
surrendered to him on the evening of September 10, 1863. By
December, eight regiments of Arkansas citizens had been formed for
service in the Union army; and, following the amnesty proclamation
of December 8, the reorganization of a loyal State government was
speedily brought about, mainly by spontaneous popular action, of
course under the direction and with the assistance of General
Steele.</p>
<p>In response to a petition, President Lincoln sent General Steele
on January 20, 1864, a letter repeating substantially the
instructions he had given General Banks for Louisiana. Before these
could be carried out, popular action had assembled at Little Rock
on January 8, 1864, a formal delegate convention, composed of
forty-four delegates who claimed to represent twenty-two out of the
fifty-four counties of the State. On January 22 this convention
adopted an amended constitution which declared the act of secession
null and void, abolished slavery immediately and unconditionally,
and wholly repudiated the Confederate debt. The convention
appointed a provisional State government, and under its schedule an
election was held on March 14, 1864. During the three days on which
the polls were kept open, under the orders of General Steele, who
by the President's suggestion adopted the convention program, a
total vote of 12,179 was cast for the constitution, and only 226
against it; while the provisional governor was also elected for a
new term, together with members of Congress and a legislature which
in due time chose United States senators. By this time Congress had
manifested its opposition to the President's plan, but Mr. Lincoln
stood firm, and on June 29 wrote to General Steele:<SPAN name="page428" id="page428"></SPAN></p>
<p>"I understand that Congress declines to admit to seats the
persons sent as senators and representatives from Arkansas. These
persons apprehend that in consequence you may not support the new
State government there as you otherwise would. My wish is that you
give that government and the people there the same support and
protection that you would if the members had been admitted, because
in no event, nor in any view of the case, can this do any harm,
while it will be the best you can do toward suppressing the
rebellion."</p>
<p>While Military Governor Andrew Johnson had been the earliest to
begin the restoration of loyal Federal authority in the State of
Tennessee, the course of campaign and battle in that State delayed
its completion to a later period than in the others. The invasion
of Tennessee by the Confederate General Bragg in the summer of
1862, and the long delay of the Union General Rosecrans to begin an
active campaign against him during the summer of 1863, kept civil
reorganization in a very uncertain and chaotic condition. When at
length Rosecrans advanced and occupied Chattanooga, President
Lincoln deemed it a propitious time to vigorously begin
reorganization, and under date of September 11, 1863, he wrote the
military governor emphatic suggestions that:</p>
<p>"The reinauguration must not be such as to give control of the
State and its representation in Congress to the enemies of the
Union, driving its friends there into political exile.... You must
have it otherwise. Let the reconstruction be the work of such men
only as can be trusted for the Union. Exclude all others; and trust
that your government so organized will be recognized here as being
the one of republican form to be guaranteed to the State, and to be
protected against invasion and domestic violence. It is
<SPAN name="page429" id="page429"></SPAN>something on the question of time to
remember that it cannot be known who is next to occupy the position
I now hold, nor what he will do. I see that you have declared in
favor of emancipation in Tennessee, for which, may God bless you.
Get emancipation into your new State
government—constitution—and there will be no such word
as fail for your case."</p>
<p>In another letter of September 19, the President sent the
governor specific authority to execute the scheme outlined in his
letter of advice; but no substantial success had yet been reached
in the process of reconstruction in Tennessee during the year 1864,
when the Confederate army under Hood turned northward from Atlanta
to begin its third and final invasion of the State. This once more
delayed all work of reconstruction until the Confederate army was
routed and dispersed by the battle of Nashville on December 15,
1864. Previous popular action had called a State convention, which,
taking immediate advantage of the expulsion of the enemy, met in
Nashville on January 9, 1865, in which fifty-eight counties and
some regiments were represented by about four hundred and
sixty-seven delegates. After six days of deliberation the
convention adopted a series of amendments to the constitution, the
main ordinance of which provided:</p>
<p>"That slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, are
hereby forever abolished and prohibited throughout the State."</p>
<p>These amendments were duly adopted at a popular election held on
February 22, and the complete organization of a loyal State
government under them followed in due course.</p>
<p>The State of Missouri needed no reconstruction. It has already
been said that her local affairs were <SPAN name="page430" id="page430"></SPAN>
administered by a provisional State government instituted by the
State convention chosen by popular election before rebellion broke
out. In this State, therefore, the institution of slavery was
suppressed by the direct action of the people, but not without a
long and bitter conflict of party factions and military strife.
There existed here two hostile currents of public opinion, one, the
intolerant pro-slavery prejudices of its rural population; the
other, the progressive and liberal spirit dominant in the city of
St. Louis, with its heavy German population, which, as far back as
1856, had elected to Congress a candidate who boldly advocated
gradual emancipation: St. Louis, with outlying cities and towns,
supplying during the whole rebellion the dominating influence that
held the State in the Union, and at length transformed her from a
slave to a free State.</p>
<p>Missouri suffered severely in the war, but not through important
campaigns or great battles. Persistent secession conspiracy, the
Kansas episodes of border strife, and secret orders of Confederate
agents from Arkansas instigating unlawful warfare, made Missouri a
hotbed of guerrilla uprisings and of relentless neighborhood feuds,
in which armed partizan conflict often degenerated into shocking
barbarity, and the pretense of war into the malicious execution of
private vengeance. President Lincoln drew a vivid picture of the
chronic disorders in Missouri in reply to complaints demanding the
removal of General Schofield from local military command:</p>
<p>"We are in civil war. In such cases there always is a main
question; but in this case that question is a perplexing
compound—Union and slavery. It thus becomes a question not of
two sides merely, but of at least four sides, even among those who
are for the<SPAN name="page431" id="page431"></SPAN> Union, saying nothing of those who are
against it. Thus, those who are for the Union <i>with</i>, but not
<i>without</i>, slavery—those for it <i>without</i>, but not
<i>with</i>—those for it <i>with</i> or <i>without</i>, but
prefer it <i>with</i>—and those for it <i>with or
without</i>, but prefer it <i>without</i>. Among these again is a
subdivision of those who are for <i>gradual</i> but not for
<i>immediate</i>, and those who are for <i>immediate</i>, but not
for <i>gradual</i> extinction of slavery. It is easy to conceive
that all these shades of opinion, and even more, may be sincerely
entertained by honest and truthful men. Yet, all being for the
Union, by reason of these differences each will prefer a different
way of sustaining the Union. At once sincerity is questioned, and
motives are assailed. Actual war coming, blood grows hot, and blood
is spilled. Thought is forced from old channels into confusion.
Deception breeds and thrives. Confidence dies and universal
suspicion reigns. Each man feels an impulse to kill his neighbor,
lest he be first killed by him. Revenge and retaliation follow. And
all this, as before said, may be among honest men only. But this is
not all. Every foul bird comes abroad and every dirty reptile rises
up. These add crime to confusion. Strong measures deemed
indispensable, but harsh at best, such men make worse by
maladministration. Murders for old grudges, and murders for pelf,
proceed under any cloak that will best cover for the occasion.
These causes amply account for what has occurred in Missouri,
without ascribing it to the weakness or wickedness of any general.
The newspaper files, those chroniclers of current events, will show
that the evils now complained of were quite as prevalent under
Frémont, Hunter, Halleck, and Curtis, as under
Schofield.... I do not feel justified to enter upon the broad field
you present in regard to the political differences between
<SPAN name="page432" id="page432"></SPAN> radicals and conservatives. From time to
time I have done and said what appeared to me proper to do and say.
The public knows it all. It obliges nobody to follow me, and I
trust it obliges me to follow nobody. The radicals and
conservatives each agree with me in some things and disagree in
others. I could wish both to agree with me in all things; for then
they would agree with each other, and would be too strong for any
foe from any quarter. They, however, choose to do otherwise, and I
do not question their right. I, too, shall do what seems to be my
duty. I hold whoever commands in Missouri, or elsewhere,
responsible to me, and not to either radicals or conservatives. It
is my duty to hear all; but at last I must, within my sphere, judge
what to do and what to forbear."</p>
<p>It is some consolation to history, that out of this blood and
travail grew the political regeneration of the State. Slavery and
emancipation never gave each other a moment's truce. The issue was
raised to an acute stage by Frémont's proclamation in
August, 1861. Though that ill-advised measure was revoked by
President Lincoln, the friction and irritation of war kept it
alive, and in the following year a member of the Missouri State
convention offered a bill to accept and apply President Lincoln's
plan of compensated abolishment. Further effort was made in this
direction in Congress, where in January, 1863, the House passed a
bill appropriating ten million dollars, and in February, the Senate
another bill appropriating fifteen million dollars to aid
compensated abolishment in Missouri. But the stubborn opposition of
three pro-slavery Missouri members of the House prevented action on
the latter bill or any compromise.</p>
<p>The question, however, continually grew among the people of
Missouri, and made such advance that parties, <SPAN name="page433" id="page433"></SPAN>accepting
the main point as already practically decided at length only
divided upon the mode of procedure The conservatives wanted the
work to be done by the old State convention, the radicals desired
to submit it to a new convention fresh from the people. Legislative
agreement having failed, the provisional governor called the old
State convention together. The convention leaders who controlled
that body inquired of the President whether he would sustain their
action. To this he made answer in a letter to Schofield dated June
22, 1863:</p>
<p>"Your despatch, asking in substance whether, in case Missouri
shall adopt gradual emancipation, the general government will
protect slave-owners in that species of property during the short
time it shall be permitted by the State to exist within it, has
been received. Desirous as I am that emancipation shall be adopted
by Missouri, and believing as I do that gradual can be made better
than immediate for both black and white, except when military
necessity changes the case, my impulse is to say that such
protection would be given. I cannot know exactly what shape an act
of emancipation may take. If the period from the initiation to the
final end should be comparatively short, and the act should prevent
persons being sold during that period into more lasting slavery,
the whole would be easier. I do not wish to pledge the general
government to the affirmative support of even temporary slavery
beyond what can be fairly claimed under the Constitution. I
suppose, however, this is not desired, but that it is desired for
the military force of the United States, while in Missouri, to not
be used in subverting the temporarily reserved legal rights in
slaves during the progress of emancipation. This I would desire
also."<SPAN name="page434" id="page434"></SPAN></p>
<p>Proceeding with its work, the old State convention, which had
hitherto made a most honorable record, neglected a great
opportunity. It indeed adopted an ordinance of gradual emancipation
on July 1, 1863, but of such an uncertain and dilatory character,
that public opinion in the State promptly rejected it. By the death
of the provisional governor on January 31, 1864, the conservative
party of Missouri lost its most trusted leader, and thereafter the
radicals succeeded to the political power of the State. At the
presidential election of 1864, that party chose a new State
convention, which met in St. Louis on January 6, 1865, and on the
sixth day of its session (January 11) formally adopted an ordinance
of immediate emancipation.</p>
<p>Maryland, like Missouri, had no need of reconstruction. Except
for the Baltimore riot and the arrest of her secession legislature
during the first year of the war, her State government continued
its regular functions. But a strong popular undercurrent of
virulent secession sympathy among a considerable minority of her
inhabitants was only held in check by the military power of the
Union, and for two years emancipation found no favor in the public
opinion of the State. Her representatives, like those of most other
border States, coldly refused President Lincoln's earnest plea to
accept compensated abolishment; and a bill in Congress to give
Maryland ten million dollars for that object was at once blighted
by the declaration of one of her leading representatives that
Maryland did not ask for it. Nevertheless, the subject could no
more be ignored there than in other States; and after the
President's emancipation proclamation an emancipation party
developed itself in Maryland.</p>
<p>There was no longer any evading the practical issue, when, by
the President's direction, the Secretary of<SPAN name="page435" id="page435"></SPAN> War
issued a military order, early in October, 1863, regulating the
raising of colored troops in certain border States, which decreed
that slaves might be enlisted without consent of their owners, but
provided compensation in such cases. At the November election of
that year the emancipation party of Maryland elected its ticket by
an overwhelming majority, and a legislature that enacted laws under
which a State convention was chosen to amend the constitution. Of
the delegates elected on April 6, 1864, sixty-one were
emancipationists, and only thirty-five opposed.</p>
<p>After two months' debate this convention by nearly two thirds
adopted an article:</p>
<p>"That hereafter in this State there shall be neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude except in punishment of crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted; and all persons held to
service or labor as slaves are hereby declared free."</p>
<p>The decisive test of a popular vote accepting the amended
constitution as a whole, remained, however, yet to be undergone.
President Lincoln willingly complied with a request to throw his
official voice and influence in favor of the measure, and wrote, on
October 10, 1864:</p>
<p>"A convention of Maryland has framed a new constitution for the
State; a public meeting is called for this evening at Baltimore to
aid in securing its ratification by the people; and you ask a word
from me for the occasion. I presume the only feature of the
instrument about which there is serious controversy is that which
provides for the extinction of slavery. It needs not to be a
secret, and I presume it is no secret, that I wish success to this
provision. I desire it on every consideration. I wish all men to be
free. I wish the material prosperity of the already free, which I
feel <SPAN name="page436" id="page436"></SPAN>sure the extinction of slavery would
bring. I wish to see in process of disappearing that only thing
which ever could bring this nation to civil war. I attempt no
argument. Argument upon the question is already exhausted by the
abler, better informed, and more immediately interested sons of
Maryland herself. I only add that I shall be gratified exceedingly
if the good people of the State shall, by their votes, ratify the
new constitution."</p>
<p>At the election which was held on October 12 and 13, stubborn
Maryland conservatism, whose roots reached far back to the colonial
days, made its last desperate stand, and the constitution was
ratified by a majority of only three hundred and seventy-five votes
out of a total of nearly sixty thousand. But the result was
accepted as decisive, and in due time the governor issued his
proclamation, declaring the new constitution legally adopted.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<SPAN name="page437" id="page437"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />