<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0176" id="link2HCH0176"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER IX </h2>
<p>Prince Andrew reached the general headquarters of the army at the end of
June. The first army, with which was the Emperor, occupied the fortified
camp at Drissa; the second army was retreating, trying to effect a
junction with the first one from which it was said to be cut off by large
French forces. Everyone was dissatisfied with the general course of
affairs in the Russian army, but no one anticipated any danger of invasion
of the Russian provinces, and no one thought the war would extend farther
than the western, the Polish, provinces.</p>
<p>Prince Andrew found Barclay de Tolly, to whom he had been assigned, on the
bank of the Drissa. As there was not a single town or large village in the
vicinity of the camp, the immense number of generals and courtiers
accompanying the army were living in the best houses of the villages on
both sides of the river, over a radius of six miles. Barclay de Tolly was
quartered nearly three miles from the Emperor. He received Bolkonski
stiffly and coldly and told him in his foreign accent that he would
mention him to the Emperor for a decision as to his employment, but asked
him meanwhile to remain on his staff. Anatole Kuragin, whom Prince Andrew
had hoped to find with the army, was not there. He had gone to Petersburg,
but Prince Andrew was glad to hear this. His mind was occupied by the
interests of the center that was conducting a gigantic war, and he was
glad to be free for a while from the distraction caused by the thought of
Kuragin. During the first four days, while no duties were required of him,
Prince Andrew rode round the whole fortified camp and, by the aid of his
own knowledge and by talks with experts, tried to form a definite opinion
about it. But the question whether the camp was advantageous or
disadvantageous remained for him undecided. Already from his military
experience and what he had seen in the Austrian campaign, he had come to
the conclusion that in war the most deeply considered plans have no
significance and that all depends on the way unexpected movements of the
enemy—that cannot be foreseen—are met, and on how and by whom
the whole matter is handled. To clear up this last point for himself,
Prince Andrew, utilizing his position and acquaintances, tried to fathom
the character of the control of the army and of the men and parties
engaged in it, and he deduced for himself the following of the state of
affairs.</p>
<p>While the Emperor had still been at Vilna, the forces had been divided
into three armies. First, the army under Barclay de Tolly, secondly, the
army under Bagration, and thirdly, the one commanded by Tormasov. The
Emperor was with the first army, but not as commander in chief. In the
orders issued it was stated, not that the Emperor would take command, but
only that he would be with the army. The Emperor, moreover, had with him
not a commander in chief's staff but the imperial headquarters staff. In
attendance on him was the head of the imperial staff, Quartermaster
General Prince Volkonski, as well as generals, imperial aides-de-camp,
diplomatic officials, and a large number of foreigners, but not the army
staff. Besides these, there were in attendance on the Emperor without any
definite appointments: Arakcheev, the ex-Minister of War; Count Bennigsen,
the senior general in rank; the Grand Duke Tsarevich Constantine
Pavlovich; Count Rumyantsev, the Chancellor; Stein, a former Prussian
minister; Armfeldt, a Swedish general; Pfuel, the chief author of the plan
of campaign; Paulucci, an adjutant general and Sardinian emigre; Wolzogen—and
many others. Though these men had no military appointment in the army,
their position gave them influence, and often a corps commander, or even
the commander in chief, did not know in what capacity he was questioned by
Bennigsen, the Grand Duke, Arakcheev, or Prince Volkonski, or was given
this or that advice and did not know whether a certain order received in
the form of advice emanated from the man who gave it or from the Emperor
and whether it had to be executed or not. But this was only the external
condition; the essential significance of the presence of the Emperor and
of all these people, from a courtier's point of view (and in an Emperor's
vicinity all became courtiers), was clear to everyone. It was this: the
Emperor did not assume the title of commander in chief, but disposed of
all the armies; the men around him were his assistants. Arakcheev was a
faithful custodian to enforce order and acted as the sovereign's
bodyguard. Bennigsen was a landlord in the Vilna province who appeared to
be doing the honors of the district, but was in reality a good general,
useful as an adviser and ready at hand to replace Barclay. The Grand Duke
was there because it suited him to be. The ex-Minister Stein was there
because his advice was useful and the Emperor Alexander held him in high
esteem personally. Armfeldt virulently hated Napoleon and was a general
full of self-confidence, a quality that always influenced Alexander.
Paulucci was there because he was bold and decided in speech. The
adjutants general were there because they always accompanied the Emperor,
and lastly and chiefly Pfuel was there because he had drawn up the plan of
campaign against Napoleon and, having induced Alexander to believe in the
efficacy of that plan, was directing the whole business of the war. With
Pfuel was Wolzogen, who expressed Pfuel's thoughts in a more
comprehensible way than Pfuel himself (who was a harsh, bookish theorist,
self-confident to the point of despising everyone else) was able to do.</p>
<p>Besides these Russians and foreigners who propounded new and unexpected
ideas every day—especially the foreigners, who did so with a
boldness characteristic of people employed in a country not their own—there
were many secondary personages accompanying the army because their
principals were there.</p>
<p>Among the opinions and voices in this immense, restless, brilliant, and
proud sphere, Prince Andrew noticed the following sharply defined
subdivisions of tendencies and parties:</p>
<p>The first party consisted of Pfuel and his adherents—military
theorists who believed in a science of war with immutable laws—laws
of oblique movements, outflankings, and so forth. Pfuel and his adherents
demanded a retirement into the depths of the country in accordance with
precise laws defined by a pseudo-theory of war, and they saw only
barbarism, ignorance, or evil intention in every deviation from that
theory. To this party belonged the foreign nobles, Wolzogen,
Wintzingerode, and others, chiefly Germans.</p>
<p>The second party was directly opposed to the first; one extreme, as always
happens, was met by representatives of the other. The members of this
party were those who had demanded an advance from Vilna into Poland and
freedom from all prearranged plans. Besides being advocates of bold
action, this section also represented nationalism, which made them still
more one-sided in the dispute. They were Russians: Bagration, Ermolov (who
was beginning to come to the front), and others. At that time a famous
joke of Ermolov's was being circulated, that as a great favor he had
petitioned the Emperor to make him a German. The men of that party,
remembering Suvorov, said that what one had to do was not to reason, or
stick pins into maps, but to fight, beat the enemy, keep him out of
Russia, and not let the army get discouraged.</p>
<p>To the third party—in which the Emperor had most confidence—belonged
the courtiers who tried to arrange compromises between the other two. The
members of this party, chiefly civilians and to whom Arakcheev belonged,
thought and said what men who have no convictions but wish to seem to have
some generally say. They said that undoubtedly war, particularly against
such a genius as Bonaparte (they called him Bonaparte now), needs most
deeply devised plans and profound scientific knowledge and in that respect
Pfuel was a genius, but at the same time it had to be acknowledged that
the theorists are often one sided, and therefore one should not trust them
absolutely, but should also listen to what Pfuel's opponents and practical
men of experience in warfare had to say, and then choose a middle course.
They insisted on the retention of the camp at Drissa, according to Pfuel's
plan, but on changing the movements of the other armies. Though, by this
course, neither one aim nor the other could be attained, yet it seemed
best to the adherents of this third party.</p>
<p>Of a fourth opinion the most conspicuous representative was the Tsarevich,
who could not forget his disillusionment at Austerlitz, where he had
ridden out at the head of the Guards, in his casque and cavalry uniform as
to a review, expecting to crush the French gallantly; but unexpectedly
finding himself in the front line had narrowly escaped amid the general
confusion. The men of this party had both the quality and the defect of
frankness in their opinions. They feared Napoleon, recognized his strength
and their own weakness, and frankly said so. They said: "Nothing but
sorrow, shame, and ruin will come of all this! We have abandoned Vilna and
Vitebsk and shall abandon Drissa. The only reasonable thing left to do is
to conclude peace as soon as possible, before we are turned out of
Petersburg."</p>
<p>This view was very general in the upper army circles and found support
also in Petersburg and from the chancellor, Rumyantsev, who, for other
reasons of state, was in favor of peace.</p>
<p>The fifth party consisted of those who were adherents of Barclay de Tolly,
not so much as a man but as minister of war and commander in chief. "Be he
what he may" (they always began like that), "he is an honest, practical
man and we have nobody better. Give him real power, for war cannot be
conducted successfully without unity of command, and he will show what he
can do, as he did in Finland. If our army is well organized and strong and
has withdrawn to Drissa without suffering any defeats, we owe this
entirely to Barclay. If Barclay is now to be superseded by Bennigsen all
will be lost, for Bennigsen showed his incapacity already in 1807."</p>
<p>The sixth party, the Bennigsenites, said, on the contrary, that at any
rate there was no one more active and experienced than Bennigsen: "and
twist about as you may, you will have to come to Bennigsen eventually. Let
the others make mistakes now!" said they, arguing that our retirement to
Drissa was a most shameful reverse and an unbroken series of blunders.
"The more mistakes that are made the better. It will at any rate be
understood all the sooner that things cannot go on like this. What is
wanted is not some Barclay or other, but a man like Bennigsen, who made
his mark in 1807, and to whom Napoleon himself did justice—a man
whose authority would be willingly recognized, and Bennigsen is the only
such man."</p>
<p>The seventh party consisted of the sort of people who are always to be
found, especially around young sovereigns, and of whom there were
particularly many round Alexander—generals and imperial
aides-de-camp passionately devoted to the Emperor, not merely as a monarch
but as a man, adoring him sincerely and disinterestedly, as Rostov had
done in 1805, and who saw in him not only all the virtues but all human
capabilities as well. These men, though enchanted with the sovereign for
refusing the command of the army, yet blamed him for such excessive
modesty, and only desired and insisted that their adored sovereign should
abandon his diffidence and openly announce that he would place himself at
the head of the army, gather round him a commander in chief's staff, and,
consulting experienced theoreticians and practical men where necessary,
would himself lead the troops, whose spirits would thereby be raised to
the highest pitch.</p>
<p>The eighth and largest group, which in its enormous numbers was to the
others as ninety-nine to one, consisted of men who desired neither peace
nor war, neither an advance nor a defensive camp at the Drissa or anywhere
else, neither Barclay nor the Emperor, neither Pfuel nor Bennigsen, but
only the one most essential thing—as much advantage and pleasure for
themselves as possible. In the troubled waters of conflicting and
intersecting intrigues that eddied about the Emperor's headquarters, it
was possible to succeed in many ways unthinkable at other times. A man who
simply wished to retain his lucrative post would today agree with Pfuel,
tomorrow with his opponent, and the day after, merely to avoid
responsibility or to please the Emperor, would declare that he had no
opinion at all on the matter. Another who wished to gain some advantage
would attract the Emperor's attention by loudly advocating the very thing
the Emperor had hinted at the day before, and would dispute and shout at
the council, beating his breast and challenging those who did not agree
with him to duels, thereby proving that he was prepared to sacrifice
himself for the common good. A third, in the absence of opponents, between
two councils would simply solicit a special gratuity for his faithful
services, well knowing that at that moment people would be too busy to
refuse him. A fourth while seemingly overwhelmed with work would often
come accidentally under the Emperor's eye. A fifth, to achieve his
long-cherished aim of dining with the Emperor, would stubbornly insist on
the correctness or falsity of some newly emerging opinion and for this
object would produce arguments more or less forcible and correct.</p>
<p>All the men of this party were fishing for rubles, decorations, and
promotions, and in this pursuit watched only the weathercock of imperial
favor, and directly they noticed it turning in any direction, this whole
drone population of the army began blowing hard that way, so that it was
all the harder for the Emperor to turn it elsewhere. Amid the
uncertainties of the position, with the menace of serious danger giving a
peculiarly threatening character to everything, amid this vortex of
intrigue, egotism, conflict of views and feelings, and the diversity of
race among these people—this eighth and largest party of those
preoccupied with personal interests imparted great confusion and obscurity
to the common task. Whatever question arose, a swarm of these drones,
without having finished their buzzing on a previous theme, flew over to
the new one and by their hum drowned and obscured the voices of those who
were disputing honestly.</p>
<p>From among all these parties, just at the time Prince Andrew reached the
army, another, a ninth party, was being formed and was beginning to raise
its voice. This was the party of the elders, reasonable men experienced
and capable in state affairs, who, without sharing any of those
conflicting opinions, were able to take a detached view of what was going
on at the staff at headquarters and to consider means of escape from this
muddle, indecision, intricacy, and weakness.</p>
<p>The men of this party said and thought that what was wrong resulted
chiefly from the Emperor's presence in the army with his military court
and from the consequent presence there of an indefinite, conditional, and
unsteady fluctuation of relations, which is in place at court but harmful
in an army; that a sovereign should reign but not command the army, and
that the only way out of the position would be for the Emperor and his
court to leave the army; that the mere presence of the Emperor paralyzed
the action of fifty thousand men required to secure his personal safety,
and that the worst commander in chief if independent would be better than
the very best one trammeled by the presence and authority of the monarch.</p>
<p>Just at the time Prince Andrew was living unoccupied at Drissa, Shishkov,
the Secretary of State and one of the chief representatives of this party,
wrote a letter to the Emperor which Arakcheev and Balashev agreed to sign.
In this letter, availing himself of permission given him by the Emperor to
discuss the general course of affairs, he respectfully suggested—on
the plea that it was necessary for the sovereign to arouse a warlike
spirit in the people of the capital—that the Emperor should leave
the army.</p>
<p>That arousing of the people by their sovereign and his call to them to
defend their country—the very incitement which was the chief cause
of Russia's triumph in so far as it was produced by the Tsar's personal
presence in Moscow—was suggested to the Emperor, and accepted by
him, as a pretext for quitting the army.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />