<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0025" id="link2H_4_0025"></SPAN></p>
<h2> SECT. V. OF THE IMPRESSIONS OF THE SENSES AND MEMORY. </h2>
<p>In this kind of reasoning, then, from causation, we employ materials,
which are of a mixed and heterogeneous nature, and which, however
connected, are yet essentially different from each other. All our
arguments concerning causes and effects consist both of an impression of
the memory or, senses, and of the idea of that existence, which produces
the object of the impression, or is produced by it. Here therefore we have
three things to explain, viz. First, The original impression. Secondly,
The transition to the idea of the connected cause or effect. Thirdly, The
nature and qualities of that idea.</p>
<p>As to those impressions, which arise from the senses, their ultimate cause
is, in my opinion, perfectly inexplicable by human reason, and it will
always be impossible to decide with certainty, whether they arise
immediately from the object, or are produced by the creative power of the
mind, or are derived from the author of our being. Nor is such a question
any way material to our present purpose. We may draw inferences from the
coherence of our perceptions, whether they be true or false; whether they
represent nature justly, or be mere illusions of the senses.</p>
<p>When we search for the characteristic, which distinguishes the memory from
the imagination, we must immediately perceive, that it cannot lie in the
simple ideas it presents to us; since both these faculties borrow their
simple ideas from the impressions, and can never go beyond these original
perceptions. These faculties are as little distinguished from each other
by the arrangement of their complex ideas. For though it be a peculiar
property of the memory to preserve the original order and position of its
ideas, while the imagination transposes and changes them, as it pleases;
yet this difference is not sufficient to distinguish them in their
operation, or make us know the one from the other; it being impossible to
recal the past impressions, in order to compare them with our present
ideas, and see whether their arrangement be exactly similar. Since
therefore the memory, is known, neither by the order of its complex ideas,
nor the nature of its simple ones; it follows, that the difference betwixt
it and the imagination lies in its superior force and vivacity. A man may
indulge his fancy in feigning any past scene of adventures; nor would
there be any possibility of distinguishing this from a remembrance of a
like kind, were not the ideas of the imagination fainter and more obscure.</p>
<p>It frequently happens, that when two men have been engaged in any scene of
action, the one shall remember it much better than the other, and shall
have all the difficulty in the world to make his companion recollect it.
He runs over several circumstances in vain; mentions the time, the place,
the company, what was said, what was done on all sides; till at last he
hits on some lucky circumstance, that revives the whole, and gives his
friend a perfect memory of every thing. Here the person that forgets
receives at first all the ideas from the discourse of the other, with the
same circumstances of time and place; though he considers them as mere
fictions of the imagination. But as soon as the circumstance is mentioned,
that touches the memory, the very same ideas now appear in a new light,
and have, in a manner, a different feeling from what they had before.
Without any other alteration, beside that of the feeling, they become
immediately ideas of the memory, and are assented to.</p>
<p>Since, therefore, the imagination can represent all the same objects that
the memory can offer to us, and since those faculties are only
distinguished by the different feeling of the ideas they present, it may
be proper to consider what is the nature of that feeling. And here I
believe every one will readily agree with me, that the ideas of the memory
are more strong and lively than those of the fancy.</p>
<p>A painter, who intended to represent a passion or emotion of any kind,
would endeavour to get a sight of a person actuated by a like emotion, in
order to enliven his ideas, and give them a force and vivacity superior to
what is found in those, which are mere fictions of the imagination. The
more recent this memory is, the clearer is the idea; and when after a long
interval he would return to the contemplation of his object, he always
finds its idea to be much decayed, if not wholly obliterated. We are
frequently in doubt concerning the ideas of the memory, as they become
very weak and feeble; and are at a loss to determine whether any image
proceeds from the fancy or the memory, when it is not drawn in such lively
colours as distinguish that latter faculty. I think, I remember such an
event, says one; but am not sure. A long tract of time has almost worn it
out of my memory, and leaves me uncertain whether or not it be the pure
offspring of my fancy.</p>
<p>And as an idea of the memory, by losing its force and vivacity, may
degenerate to such a degree, as to be taken for an idea of the
imagination; so on the other hand an idea of the imagination may acquire
such a force and vivacity, as to pass for an idea of the memory, and
counterfeit its effects on the belief and judgment. This is noted in the
case of liars; who by the frequent repetition of their lies, come at last
to believe and remember them, as realities; custom and habit having in
this case, as in many others, the same influence on the mind as nature,
and infixing the idea with equal force and vigour.</p>
<p>Thus it appears, that the belief or assent, which always attends the
memory and senses, is nothing but the vivacity of those perceptions they
present; and that this alone distinguishes them from the imagination. To
believe is in this case to feel an immediate impression of the senses, or
a repetition of that impression in the memory. It is merely the force and
liveliness of the perception, which constitutes the first act of the
judgment, and lays the foundation of that reasoning, which we build upon
it, when we trace the relation of cause and effect.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />