<p><span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_55" id="Page_55"></SPAN></span></p>
<h2>MAY: THE CUCKOO</h2>
<p class="cap"><span class="dcap">With</span> the single exception of the
nightingale, bird of lovers, no other
has been more written of in prose or verse
than the so-called "harbinger of spring."
This is a foolish name for a visitor that does
not reach our shores before, at any rate, the
middle of April. Even <i>Whitaker</i> allows us
to recognise the coming of spring nearly a
month earlier; and for myself, impatient if
only for the illusion of Nature's awakening,
I date my spring from the ending of the
shortest day. Once the days begin to
lengthen, it is time to glance at the elms for
the return of the rooks and to get out one's
fishing-tackle again. Yet the cuckoo comes
rarely before the third week of April, save in
the fervent imagination of premature heralds,
who, giving rein to a fancy winged by desire,
or honestly deceived by some village cuckoo
clock heard on their country rambles,
solemnly write to the papers announcing the
inevitable March cuckoo. They know better
in the Channel Islands, for in the second week<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_56" id="Page_56"></SPAN></span>
of April, and not before, there are cuckoos in
every bush—hundreds of exhausted travellers
pausing for strength to complete the rest of
their journey to Britain. Not on the return
migration in August do the wanderers assemble
in the islands, since, having but
lately set out, they are not yet weary enough
to need the rest. The only district of England
in which I have heard of similar gatherings
of cuckoos is East Anglia, where, about the
time of their arrival, they regularly collect in
the bushes and indulge in preliminary
gambols before flying north and west.</p>
<p>Cuckoos, then, reach these islands about
the third week of April, and they leave us
again at the end of the summer, the old birds
flying south in July, the younger generation
following three or four weeks later. Goodness
knows by what extraordinary instinct these
young ones know the way. But the young
cuckoo is a marvel altogether in the manner
of its education, since, when one comes to
think of it, it has no upbringing by its own
parents and cannot even learn how to cry
"Cuckoo!" by example or instruction. Its
foster-parents speak another language, and<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_57" id="Page_57"></SPAN></span>
its own folk have ceased from singing by the
time it is out of the nest. A good deal has
been written about the way in which the
note varies, chiefly in the direction of greater
harshness and a more staccato and less
sustained note, towards the end of the
cuckoo's stay. According to the rustic rhyme,
it changes its tune in June, which is probably
poetic licence rather than the fruits of actual
observation. It is, however, commonly agreed
that the cuckoo is less often heard as the
time of its departure draws near, and the
easiest explanation of its silence, once the
breeding season is ended, is that the note,
being the love-call of a polygamous bird, is
no longer needed.</p>
<p>In Australia the female cuckoo is handsomely
barred with white, whereas the male
is uniformly black; but with our bird it is
exceedingly difficult to distinguish one sex
from the other on the wing, and, were it not
for occasional evidence of females having been
shot when actually calling, we might still
believe that it is the male only that makes
this sound. The note is joyous only in the
poet's fancy, just as he has also read sadness<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_58" id="Page_58"></SPAN></span>
into the "sobbing" of the nightingale.
There is, indeed, when we consider its life,
something fantastic in the hypothesis that
the cuckoo can know no trouble in life,
merely because it escapes the rigours of our
winter. Eternal summer must be a delight,
but the cuckoo has to work hard for the
privilege, and it must at times be harried to
the verge of desperation by the small birds
that continually mob it in broad daylight.
This behaviour on the part of its pertinacious
little neighbours has been the occasion of
much futile speculation; but the one certain
result of such persecution is to make the
cuckoo, along with its fellow-sufferer, the
owls, preferably active in the sweet peace of
the gloaming, when its puny tyrants are
gone to roost. Much heated argument has
raged round the real or supposed sentiment
that inspires such demonstrations on the
part of linnets, sparrows, chaffinches, and
other determined hunters of the cuckoo.
It seems impossible, when we observe the
larger bird's unmistakable desire to win free
of them, to attribute friendly feelings to its
pursuers. Yet some writers have held the<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_59" id="Page_59"></SPAN></span>
curious belief that, with lingering memories
of the days when, a year ago, they devoted
themselves to the ugly foster-child, the little
birds still regard the stranger with affection.
If so, then they have an eccentric way of
showing it, and the cuckoo, driven by the
chattering little termagants from pillar to
post, may well pray to be saved from its
friends. On the other hand, even though convinced
of their hostility, it is not easy to
believe, as some folks tell us, that they mistake
the cuckoo for a hawk. Even the human
eye, though slower to take note of such differences,
can distinguish between the two, and
the cuckoo's note would still further undeceive
them. The most satisfactory explanation
of all perhaps is that the nest memories
do in truth survive, not, however, investing
the cuckoo with a halo of romance, but rather
branding it as an object of suspicion, an
interloper, to be driven out of the neighbourhood
at all costs ere it has time to billet its
offspring on the hard-working residents. All
of which is, needless to say, the merest guesswork,
since any attempt to interpret the
simplest actions of birds is likely to lead us<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_60" id="Page_60"></SPAN></span>
into erroneous conclusions. Yet, of the two, it
certainly seems more reasonable to regard
the smaller birds as resenting the parasitic
habit in the cuckoo than to admit that they
can actually welcome the murder of their own
offspring to make room in the nest for the
ugly changeling foisted on them by this
fly-by-night.</p>
<p>On the <i>lucus a non lucendo</i> principle, the
cuckoo is chiefly interesting as a parent. The
bare fact is that our British kind builds no
nest of its own, but puts its eggs out to hatch,
choosing for the purpose the nests of numerous
small birds which it knows to be suitable.
Further investigation of the habits of this
not very secretive bird, shows that she first
lays her egg on the ground and then carries
it in her bill to a neighbouring nest. Whether
she first chooses the nest and then lays the
egg destined to be hatched in it, or whether
she lays each egg when so moved and then
hunts about for a home for it, has never been
ascertained. The former method seems the
more practical of the two. On the other hand,
little nests of the right sort are so plentiful in
May that, with her mother-instinct to guide<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_61" id="Page_61"></SPAN></span>
her, she could always find one at a few
moments' notice. Some people, who are
never so happy as when making the wonders
of Nature seem still more wonderful than
they really are, have declared that the cuckoo
lays eggs to match those among which she
deposits them, or that, at any rate, she
chooses the nests of birds whose eggs approximately
resemble her own. I should have
liked to believe this, but am unfortunately
debarred by the memory of about forty
cuckoo's eggs that I took, seven-and-twenty
summers ago, in the woods round Dartford
Heath. The majority of these were found in
hedgesparrows' nests, and the absolute dissimilarity
between the great spotted egg of
the cuckoo and the little blue egg of its so-called
dupe would have impressed even a
colour-blind animal. Occasionally, I believe,
a blue cuckoo's egg has been found, but such
a freak could hardly be the result of design.
As a matter of fact, there is no need for any
such elaborate deception. Up to the moment
of hatching, the little foster-parents have in
all probability no suspicion of the trick that
has been played on them. Birds do not take<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_62" id="Page_62"></SPAN></span>
deliberate notice of the size or colour of their
own eggs. Kearton somewhere relates how
he once induced a blackbird to sit on the eggs
of a thrush, and a lapwing on those of a redshank.
So, too, farmyard hens will hatch the
eggs of ducks or game birds and wild birds
can even be persuaded to sit on eggs made of
painted wood. Why then, since they are so
careless of appearances, should the cuckoo
go to all manner of trouble to match the eggs
of hedgesparrow, robin or warbler? The bird
would not notice the difference, and, even if
she did, she would probably sit quite as close,
if only for the sake of the other eggs of her
own laying. Once the ugly nestling is hatched,
there comes swift awakening. Yet there is
no thought of reprisal or desertion. It looks
rather as if the little foster-parents are hypnotised
by the uncouth guest, for they see
their own young ones elbowed out of the home
and continue, with unflagging devotion, to
minister to the insatiable appetite of the
greedy little murderer. A bird so imbued as
the parasitic cuckoo with the <i>Wanderlust</i>
would make a very careless parent, and we
must therefore perhaps revise our unflattering<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_63" id="Page_63"></SPAN></span>
estimate of its attitude and admit that it
does the best it can by its offspring in putting
them out to nurse. This habit, unique among
British birds, is practised by many others
elsewhere, and in particular by the American
troupials, or cattle-starlings. One of these
indeed goes even farther, since it entrusts its
eggs to the care of a nest-building cousin.
There are also American cuckoos that build
their own nest and incubate their own eggs.</p>
<p>On the whole, our cuckoo is a friend to the
farmer, for it destroys vast quantities of
hairy caterpillars that no other bird, resident
or migratory, would touch. On the other
hand, no doubt, the numbers of other small
useful birds must suffer, not alone because
the cuckoo sucks their eggs, but also because,
as has been shown, the rearing of every young
cuckoo means the destruction of the legitimate
occupants of the nest. So far however
as the farmer is concerned, this is probably
balanced by the reflection that a single
young cuckoo is so rapacious as to need all
the insect food available.</p>
<p>The cuckoo, like the woodcock, is supposed
to have its forerunner. Just as the small<span class='pagenum'><SPAN name="Page_64" id="Page_64"></SPAN></span>
horned owl, which reaches our shores a little
in advance of the latter, is popularly known as
the "woodcock owl," so also the wryneck,
which comes to us about the same time as
the first of the cuckoos, goes by the name of
"cuckoo-leader." It is never a very conspicuous
bird, and appears to be rarer nowadays
than formerly. Schoolboys know it
best from its habit of hissing like a snake
and giving them a rare fright when they
cautiously insert a predatory hand in some
hollow tree in search of a possible nest. It is
in such situations that, along with titmice
and some other birds, the wryneck rears its
young; and it doubtless owes many an escape
to this habit of hissing, accompanied by a
vigorous twisting of its neck and the infliction
of a sufficient peck, easily mistaken in a moment
of panic for the bite of an angry adder.
Thus does Nature protect her weaklings.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />