<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_129" id="Page_129"></SPAN></span></p>
<h2>X</h2>
<h3>ANALOGIES IN SENSE PERCEPTION</h3>
<div class='cap'>I HAVE not touched the outline of a
star nor the glory of the moon, but
I believe that God has set two lights in
mind, the greater to rule by day and
the lesser by night, and by them I know
that I am able to navigate my life-bark,
as certain of reaching the haven as he
who steers by the North Star. Perhaps
my sun shines not as yours. The colours
that glorify my world, the blue of the
sky, the green of the fields, may not correspond
exactly with those you delight
in; but they are none the less colour to
me. The sun does not shine for my<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_130" id="Page_130"></SPAN></span>
physical eyes, nor does the lightning
flash, nor do the trees turn green in the
spring; but they have not therefore
ceased to exist, any more than the landscape
is annihilated when you turn your
back on it.</div>
<p>I understand how scarlet can differ
from crimson because I know that the
smell of an orange is not the smell of
a grape-fruit. I can also conceive that
colours have shades, and guess what
shades are. In smell and taste there are
varieties not broad enough to be fundamental;
so I call them shades. There
are half a dozen roses near me. They
all have the unmistakable rose scent; yet
my nose tells me that they are not the
same. The American Beauty is distinct
from the Jacqueminot and La
France. Odours in certain grasses fade<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_131" id="Page_131"></SPAN></span>
as really to my sense as certain colours do
to yours in the sun. The freshness of a
flower in my hand is analogous to the
freshness I taste in an apple newly
picked. I make use of analogies like
these to enlarge my conceptions of
colours. Some analogies which I draw
between qualities in surface and vibration,
taste and smell, are drawn by
others between sight, hearing, and touch.
This fact encourages me to persevere,
to try and bridge the gap between the
eye and the hand.</p>
<p>Certainly I get far enough to sympathize
with the delight that my kind feel
in beauty they see and harmony they
hear. This bond between humanity and
me is worth keeping, even if the idea on
which I base it prove erroneous.</p>
<p>Sweet, beautiful vibrations exist for<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_132" id="Page_132"></SPAN></span>
my touch, even though they travel
through other substances than air to
reach me. So I imagine sweet, delightful
sounds, and the artistic arrangement
of them which is called music, and I remember
that they travel through the air
to the ear, conveying impressions somewhat
like mine. I also know what tones
are, since they are perceptible tactually
in a voice. Now, heat varies greatly in
the sun, in the fire, in hands, and in the
fur of animals; indeed, there is such a
thing for me as a cold sun. So I think
of the varieties of light that touch the
eye, cold and warm, vivid and dim, soft
and glaring, but always light, and I
imagine their passage through the air
to an extensive sense, instead of to a
narrow one like touch. From the experience
I have had with voices I guess<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_133" id="Page_133"></SPAN></span>
how the eye distinguishes shades in the
midst of light. While I read the lips of
a woman whose voice is soprano, I note
a low tone or a glad tone in the midst of
a high, flowing voice. When I feel my
cheeks hot, I know that I am red. I
have talked so much and read so much
about colours that through no will of my
own I attach meanings to them, just as
all people attach certain meanings to
abstract terms like hope, idealism, monotheism,
intellect, which cannot be represented
truly by visible objects, but
which are understood from analogies between
immaterial concepts and the
ideas they awaken of external things.
The force of association drives me to
say that white is exalted and pure, green
is exuberant, red suggests love or shame
or strength. Without the colour or its<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_134" id="Page_134"></SPAN></span>
equivalent, life to me would be dark,
barren, a vast blackness.</p>
<p>Thus through an inner law of completeness
my thoughts are not permitted
to remain colourless. It strains my mind
to separate colour and sound from objects.
Since my education began I have
always had things described to me with
their colours and sounds by one with keen
senses and a fine feeling for the significant.
Therefore I habitually think of
things as coloured and resonant. Habit
accounts for part. The soul sense accounts
for another part. The brain with
its five-sensed construction asserts its
right and accounts for the rest. Inclusive
of all, the unity of the world demands
that colour be kept in it, whether I
have cognizance of it or not. Rather
than be shut out, I take part in it by discussing<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_135" id="Page_135"></SPAN></span>
it, imagining it, happy in the
happiness of those near me who gaze at
the lovely hues of the sunset or the rainbow.</p>
<p>My hand has its share in this multiple
knowledge, but it must never be forgotten
that with the fingers I see only a
very small portion of a surface, and that
I must pass my hand continually over it
before my touch grasps the whole. It
is still more important, however, to remember
that my imagination is not
tethered to certain points, locations, and
distances. It puts all the parts together
simultaneously as if it saw or knew instead
of feeling them. Though I feel
only a small part of my horse at a time,—my
horse is nervous and does not submit
to manual explorations,—yet, because
I have many times felt hock, nose,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_136" id="Page_136"></SPAN></span>
hoof and mane, I can see the steeds of
Phœbus Apollo coursing the heavens.</p>
<p>With such a power active it is impossible
that my thought should be vague,
indistinct. It must needs be potent,
definite. This is really a corollary of
the philosophical truth that the real
world exists only for the mind. That is
to say, I can never touch the world in its
entirety; indeed, I touch less of it than
the portion that others see or hear. But
all creatures, all objects, pass into my
brain entire, and occupy the same extent
there that they do in material space. I
declare that for me branched thoughts,
instead of pines, wave, sway, rustle,
make musical the ridges of mountains
rising summit upon summit. Mention
a rose too far away for me to smell it.
Straightway a scent steals into my nostril,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_137" id="Page_137"></SPAN></span>
a form presses against my palm in
all its dilating softness, with rounded
petals, slightly curled edges, curving
stem, leaves drooping. When I would
fain view the world as a whole, it rushes
into vision—man, beast, bird, reptile,
fly, sky, ocean, mountains, plain, rock,
pebble. The warmth of life, the reality
of creation is over all—the throb of
human hands, glossiness of fur, lithe
windings of long bodies, poignant buzzing
of insects, the ruggedness of the
steeps as I climb them, the liquid mobility
and boom of waves upon the rocks.
Strange to say, try as I may, I cannot
force my touch to pervade this universe
in all directions. The moment I try, the
whole vanishes; only small objects or
narrow portions of a surface, mere
touch-signs, a chaos of things scattered<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_138" id="Page_138"></SPAN></span>
at random, remain. No thrill, no delight
is excited thereby. Restore to the
artistic, comprehensive internal sense its
rightful domain, and you give me joy
which best proves the reality.</p>
<h2>BEFORE THE SOUL DAWN</h2><p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_139" id="Page_139"></SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />