<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN>
<h1> ESSAYS, SECOND SERIES </h1>
<h2> By Ralph Waldo Emerson </h2>
<p><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><br/></p>
<p>THE POET.<br/>
<br/>
A moody child and wildly wise<br/>
Pursued the game with joyful eyes,<br/>
Which chose, like meteors, their way,<br/>
And rived the dark with private ray:<br/>
They overleapt the horizon's edge,<br/>
Searched with Apollo's privilege;<br/>
Through man, and woman, and sea, and star<br/>
Saw the dance of nature forward far;<br/>
Through worlds, and races, and terms, and times<br/>
Saw musical order, and pairing rhymes.<br/>
<br/>
Olympian bards who sung<br/>
Divine ideas below,<br/>
Which always find us young,<br/>
And always keep us so.<br/>
<br/>
<br/></p>
<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0001" id="link2H_4_0001"></SPAN></p>
<h2> I. THE POET. </h2>
<p>Those who are esteemed umpires of taste are often persons who have
acquired some knowledge of admired pictures or sculptures, and have an
inclination for whatever is elegant; but if you inquire whether they are
beautiful souls, and whether their own acts are like fair pictures, you
learn that they are selfish and sensual. Their cultivation is local, as if
you should rub a log of dry wood in one spot to produce fire, all the rest
remaining cold. Their knowledge of the fine arts is some study of rules
and particulars, or some limited judgment of color or form, which is
exercised for amusement or for show. It is a proof of the shallowness of
the doctrine of beauty as it lies in the minds of our amateurs, that men
seem to have lost the perception of the instant dependence of form upon
soul. There is no doctrine of forms in our philosophy. We were put into
our bodies, as fire is put into a pan to be carried about; but there is no
accurate adjustment between the spirit and the organ, much less is the
latter the germination of the former. So in regard to other forms, the
intellectual men do not believe in any essential dependence of the
material world on thought and volition. Theologians think it a pretty
air-castle to talk of the Spiritual meaning of a ship or a cloud, of a
city or a contract, but they prefer to come again to the solid ground of
historical evidence; and even the poets are contented with a civil and
conformed manner of living, and to write poems from the fancy, at a safe
distance from their own experience. But the highest minds of the world
have never ceased to explore the double meaning, or shall I say the
quadruple or the centuple or much more manifold meaning, of every sensuous
fact; Orpheus, Empedocles, Heraclitus, Plato, Plutarch, Dante, Swedenborg,
and the masters of sculpture, picture, and poetry. For we are not pans and
barrows, nor even porters of the fire and torch-bearers, but children of
the fire, made of it, and only the same divinity transmuted and at two or
three removes, when we know least about it. And this hidden truth, that
the fountains whence all this river of Time and its creatures floweth are
intrinsically ideal and beautiful, draws us to the consideration of the
nature and functions of the Poet, or the man of Beauty; to the means and
materials he uses, and to the general aspect of the art in the present
time.</p>
<p>The breadth of the problem is great, for the poet is representative. He
stands among partial men for the complete man, and apprises us not of his
wealth, but of the common wealth. The young man reveres men of genius,
because, to speak truly, they are more himself than he is. They receive of
the soul as he also receives, but they more. Nature enhances her beauty,
to the eye of loving men, from their belief that the poet is beholding her
shows at the same time. He is isolated among his contemporaries by truth
and by his art, but with this consolation in his pursuits, that they will
draw all men sooner or later. For all men live by truth and stand in need
of expression. In love, in art, in avarice, in politics, in labor, in
games, we study to utter our painful secret. The man is only half himself,
the other half is his expression.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding this necessity to be published, adequate expression is
rare. I know not how it is that we need an interpreter, but the great
majority of men seem to be minors, who have not yet come into possession
of their own, or mutes, who cannot report the conversation they have had
with nature. There is no man who does not anticipate a supersensual
utility in the sun and stars, earth and water. These stand and wait to
render him a peculiar service. But there is some obstruction or some
excess of phlegm in our constitution, which does not suffer them to yield
the due effect. Too feeble fall the impressions of nature on us to make us
artists. Every touch should thrill. Every man should be so much an artist
that he could report in conversation what had befallen him. Yet, in our
experience, the rays or appulses have sufficient force to arrive at the
senses, but not enough to reach the quick and compel the reproduction of
themselves in speech. The poet is the person in whom these powers are in
balance, the man without impediment, who sees and handles that which
others dream of, traverses the whole scale of experience, and is
representative of man, in virtue of being the largest power to receive and
to impart.</p>
<p>For the Universe has three children, born at one time, which reappear
under different names in every system of thought, whether they be called
cause, operation, and effect; or, more poetically, Jove, Pluto, Neptune;
or, theologically, the Father, the Spirit, and the Son; but which we will
call here the Knower, the Doer, and the Sayer. These stand respectively
for the love of truth, for the love of good, and for the love of beauty.
These three are equal. Each is that which he is essentially, so that he
cannot be surmounted or analyzed, and each of these three has the power of
the others latent in him, and his own, patent.</p>
<p>The poet is the sayer, the namer, and represents beauty. He is a
sovereign, and stands on the centre. For the world is not painted or
adorned, but is from the beginning beautiful; and God has not made some
beautiful things, but Beauty is the creator of the universe. Therefore the
poet is not any permissive potentate, but is emperor in his own right.
Criticism is infested with a cant of materialism, which assumes that
manual skill and activity is the first merit of all men, and disparages
such as say and do not, overlooking the fact that some men, namely poets,
are natural sayers, sent into the world to the end of expression, and
confounds them with those whose province is action but who quit it to
imitate the sayers. But Homer's words are as costly and admirable to Homer
as Agamemnon's victories are to Agamemnon. The poet does not wait for the
hero or the sage, but, as they act and think primarily, so he writes
primarily what will and must be spoken, reckoning the others, though
primaries also, yet, in respect to him, secondaries and servants; as
sitters or models in the studio of a painter, or as assistants who bring
building materials to an architect.</p>
<p>For poetry was all written before time was, and whenever we are so finely
organized that we can penetrate into that region where the air is music,
we hear those primal warblings and attempt to write them down, but we lose
ever and anon a word or a verse and substitute something of our own, and
thus miswrite the poem. The men of more delicate ear write down these
cadences more faithfully, and these transcripts, though imperfect, become
the songs of the nations. For nature is as truly beautiful as it is good,
or as it is reasonable, and must as much appear as it must be done, or be
known. Words and deeds are quite indifferent modes of the divine energy.
Words are also actions, and actions are a kind of words.</p>
<p>The sign and credentials of the poet are that he announces that which no
man foretold. He is the true and only doctor; he knows and tells; he is
the only teller of news, for he was present and privy to the appearance
which he describes. He is a beholder of ideas and an utterer of the
necessary and causal. For we do not speak now of men of poetical talents,
or of industry and skill in metre, but of the true poet. I took part in a
conversation the other day concerning a recent writer of lyrics, a man of
subtle mind, whose head appeared to be a music-box of delicate tunes and
rhythms, and whose skill and command of language, we could not
sufficiently praise. But when the question arose whether he was not only a
lyrist but a poet, we were obliged to confess that he is plainly a
contemporary, not an eternal man. He does not stand out of our low
limitations, like a Chimborazo under the line, running up from the torrid
Base through all the climates of the globe, with belts of the herbage of
every latitude on its high and mottled sides; but this genius is the
landscape-garden of a modern house, adorned with fountains and statues,
with well-bred men and women standing and sitting in the walks and
terraces. We hear, through all the varied music, the ground-tone of
conventional life. Our poets are men of talents who sing, and not the
children of music. The argument is secondary, the finish of the verses is
primary.</p>
<p>For it is not metres, but a metre-making argument that makes a poem,—a
thought so passionate and alive that like the spirit of a plant or an
animal it has an architecture of its own, and adorns nature with a new
thing. The thought and the form are equal in the order of time, but in the
order of genesis the thought is prior to the form. The poet has a new
thought; he has a whole new experience to unfold; he will tell us how it
was with him, and all men will be the richer in his fortune. For the
experience of each new age requires a new confession, and the world seems
always waiting for its poet. I remember when I was young how much I was
moved one morning by tidings that genius had appeared in a youth who sat
near me at table. He had left his work and gone rambling none knew
whither, and had written hundreds of lines, but could not tell whether
that which was in him was therein told; he could tell nothing but that all
was changed,—man, beast, heaven, earth and sea. How gladly we
listened! how credulous! Society seemed to be compromised. We sat in the
aurora of a sunrise which was to put out all the stars. Boston seemed to
be at twice the distance it had the night before, or was much farther than
that. Rome,—what was Rome? Plutarch and Shakspeare were in the
yellow leaf, and Homer no more should be heard of. It is much to know that
poetry has been written this very day, under this very roof, by your side.
What! that wonderful spirit has not expired! These stony moments are still
sparkling and animated! I had fancied that the oracles were all silent,
and nature had spent her fires; and behold! all night, from every pore,
these fine auroras have been streaming. Every one has some interest in the
advent of the poet, and no one knows how much it may concern him. We know
that the secret of the world is profound, but who or what shall be our
interpreter, we know not. A mountain ramble, a new style of face, a new
person, may put the key into our hands. Of course the value of genius to
us is in the veracity of its report. Talent may frolic and juggle; genius
realizes and adds. Mankind in good earnest have availed so far in
understanding themselves and their work, that the foremost watchman on the
peak announces his news. It is the truest word ever spoken, and the phrase
will be the fittest, most musical, and the unerring voice of the world for
that time.</p>
<p>All that we call sacred history attests that the birth of a poet is the
principal event in chronology. Man, never so often deceived, still watches
for the arrival of a brother who can hold him steady to a truth until he
has made it his own. With what joy I begin to read a poem which I confide
in as an inspiration! And now my chains are to be broken; I shall mount
above these clouds and opaque airs in which I live,—opaque, though
they seem transparent,—and from the heaven of truth I shall see and
comprehend my relations. That will reconcile me to life and renovate
nature, to see trifles animated by a tendency, and to know what I am
doing. Life will no more be a noise; now I shall see men and women, and
know the signs by which they may be discerned from fools and satans. This
day shall be better than my birthday: then I became an animal; now I am
invited into the science of the real. Such is the hope, but the fruition
is postponed. Oftener it falls that this winged man, who will carry me
into the heaven, whirls me into mists, then leaps and frisks about with me
as it were from cloud to cloud, still affirming that he is bound
heavenward; and I, being myself a novice, am slow in perceiving that he
does not know the way into the heavens, and is merely bent that I should
admire his skill to rise like a fowl or a flying fish, a little way from
the ground or the water; but the all-piercing, all-feeding, and ocular air
of heaven that man shall never inhabit. I tumble down again soon into my
old nooks, and lead the life of exaggerations as before, and have lost my
faith in the possibility of any guide who can lead me thither where I
would be.</p>
<p>But, leaving these victims of vanity, let us, with new hope, observe how
nature, by worthier impulses, has ensured the poet's fidelity to his
office of announcement and affirming, namely by the beauty of things,
which becomes a new and higher beauty when expressed. Nature offers all
her creatures to him as a picture-language. Being used as a type, a second
wonderful value appears in the object, far better than its old value; as
the carpenter's stretched cord, if you hold your ear close enough, is
musical in the breeze. "Things more excellent than every image," says
Jamblichus, "are expressed through images." Things admit of being used as
symbols because nature is a symbol, in the whole, and in every part. Every
line we can draw in the sand has expression; and there is no body without
its spirit or genius. All form is an effect of character; all condition,
of the quality of the life; all harmony, of health; and for this reason a
perception of beauty should be sympathetic, or proper only to the good.
The beautiful rests on the foundations of the necessary. The soul makes
the body, as the wise Spenser teaches:—</p>
<p>"So every spirit, as it is most pure,<br/>
And hath in it the more of heavenly light,<br/>
So it the fairer body doth procure<br/>
To habit in, and it more fairly dight,<br/>
With cheerful grace and amiable sight.<br/>
For, of the soul, the body form doth take,<br/>
For soul is form, and doth the body make."<br/></p>
<p>Here we find ourselves suddenly not in a critical speculation but in a
holy place, and should go very warily and reverently. We stand before the
secret of the world, there where Being passes into Appearance and Unity
into Variety.</p>
<p>The Universe is the externization of the soul. Wherever the life is, that
bursts into appearance around it. Our science is sensual, and therefore
superficial. The earth and the heavenly bodies, physics, and chemistry, we
sensually treat, as if they were self-existent; but these are the retinue
of that Being we have. "The mighty heaven," said Proclus, "exhibits, in
its transfigurations, clear images of the splendor of intellectual
perceptions; being moved in conjunction with the unapparent periods of
intellectual natures." Therefore science always goes abreast with the just
elevation of the man, keeping step with religion and metaphysics; or the
state of science is an index of our self-knowledge. Since everything in
nature answers to a moral power, if any phenomenon remains brute and dark
it is that the corresponding faculty in the observer is not yet active.</p>
<p>No wonder then, if these waters be so deep, that we hover over them with a
religious regard. The beauty of the fable proves the importance of the
sense; to the poet, and to all others; or, if you please, every man is so
far a poet as to be susceptible of these enchantments of nature; for all
men have the thoughts whereof the universe is the celebration. I find that
the fascination resides in the symbol. Who loves nature? Who does not? Is
it only poets, and men of leisure and cultivation, who live with her? No;
but also hunters, farmers, grooms, and butchers, though they express their
affection in their choice of life and not in their choice of words. The
writer wonders what the coachman or the hunter values in riding, in horses
and dogs. It is not superficial qualities. When you talk with him he holds
these at as slight a rate as you. His worship is sympathetic; he has no
definitions, but he is commanded in nature, by the living power which he
feels to be there present. No imitation or playing of these things would
content him; he loves the earnest of the north wind, of rain, of stone,
and wood, and iron. A beauty not explicable is dearer than a beauty which
we can see to the end of. It is nature the symbol, nature certifying the
supernatural, body overflowed by life which he worships with coarse but
sincere rites.</p>
<p>The inwardness and mystery of this attachment drives men of every class to
the use of emblems. The schools of poets and philosophers are not more
intoxicated with their symbols than the populace with theirs. In our
political parties, compute the power of badges and emblems. See the great
ball which they roll from Baltimore to Bunker hill! In the political
processions, Lowell goes in a loom, and Lynn in a shoe, and Salem in a
ship. Witness the cider-barrel, the log-cabin, the hickory-stick, the
palmetto, and all the cognizances of party. See the power of national
emblems. Some stars, lilies, leopards, a crescent, a lion, an eagle, or
other figure which came into credit God knows how, on an old rag of
bunting, blowing in the wind on a fort at the ends of the earth, shall
make the blood tingle under the rudest or the most conventional exterior.
The people fancy they hate poetry, and they are all poets and mystics!</p>
<p>Beyond this universality of the symbolic language, we are apprised of the
divineness of this superior use of things, whereby the world is a temple
whose walls are covered with emblems, pictures, and commandments of the
Deity,—in this, that there is no fact in nature which does not carry
the whole sense of nature; and the distinctions which we make in events
and in affairs, of low and high, honest and base, disappear when nature is
used as a symbol. Thought makes everything fit for use. The vocabulary of
an omniscient man would embrace words and images excluded from polite
conversation. What would be base, or even obscene, to the obscene, becomes
illustrious, spoken in a new connexion of thought. The piety of the Hebrew
prophets purges their grossness. The circumcision is an example of the
power of poetry to raise the low and offensive. Small and mean things
serve as well as great symbols. The meaner the type by which a law is
expressed, the more pungent it is, and the more lasting in the memories of
men: just as we choose the smallest box or case in which any needful
utensil can be carried. Bare lists of words are found suggestive to an
imaginative and excited mind; as it is related of Lord Chatham that he was
accustomed to read in Bailey's Dictionary when he was preparing to speak
in Parliament. The poorest experience is rich enough for all the purposes
of expressing thought. Why covet a knowledge of new facts? Day and night,
house and garden, a few books, a few actions, serve us as well as would
all trades and all spectacles. We are far from having exhausted the
significance of the few symbols we use. We can come to use them yet with a
terrible simplicity. It does not need that a poem should be long. Every
word was once a poem. Every new relation is a new word. Also we use
defects and deformities to a sacred purpose, so expressing our sense that
the evils of the world are such only to the evil eye. In the old
mythology, mythologists observe, defects are ascribed to divine natures,
as lameness to Vulcan, blindness to Cupid, and the like,—to signify
exuberances.</p>
<p>For as it is dislocation and detachment from the life of God that makes
things ugly, the poet, who re-attaches things to nature and the Whole,—re-attaching
even artificial things and violations of nature, to nature, by a deeper
insight,—disposes very easily of the most disagreeable facts.
Readers of poetry see the factory-village and the railway, and fancy that
the poetry of the landscape is broken up by these; for these works of art
are not yet consecrated in their reading; but the poet sees them fall
within the great Order not less than the beehive or the spider's
geometrical web. Nature adopts them very fast into her vital circles, and
the gliding train of cars she loves like her own. Besides, in a centred
mind, it signifies nothing how many mechanical inventions you exhibit.
Though you add millions, and never so surprising, the fact of mechanics
has not gained a grain's weight. The spiritual fact remains unalterable,
by many or by few particulars; as no mountain is of any appreciable height
to break the curve of the sphere. A shrewd country-boy goes to the city
for the first time, and the complacent citizen is not satisfied with his
little wonder. It is not that he does not see all the fine houses and know
that he never saw such before, but he disposes of them as easily as the
poet finds place for the railway. The chief value of the new fact is to
enhance the great and constant fact of Life, which can dwarf any and every
circumstance, and to which the belt of wampum and the commerce of America
are alike.</p>
<p>The world being thus put under the mind for verb and noun, the poet is he
who can articulate it. For though life is great, and fascinates, and
absorbs; and though all men are intelligent of the symbols through which
it is named; yet they cannot originally use them. We are symbols and
inhabit symbols; workmen, work, and tools, words and things, birth and
death, all are emblems; but we sympathize with the symbols, and being
infatuated with the economical uses of things, we do not know that they
are thoughts. The poet, by an ulterior intellectual perception, gives them
a power which makes their old use forgotten, and puts eyes and a tongue
into every dumb and inanimate object. He perceives the independence of the
thought on the symbol, the stability of the thought, the accidency and
fugacity of the symbol. As the eyes of Lyncaeus were said to see through
the earth, so the poet turns the world to glass, and shows us all things
in their right series and procession. For through that better perception
he stands one step nearer to things, and sees the flowing or
metamorphosis; perceives that thought is multiform; that within the form
of every creature is a force impelling it to ascend into a higher form;
and following with his eyes the life, uses the forms which express that
life, and so his speech flows with the flowing of nature. All the facts of
the animal economy, sex, nutriment, gestation, birth, growth, are symbols
of the passage of the world into the soul of man, to suffer there a change
and reappear a new and higher fact. He uses forms according to the life,
and not according to the form. This is true science. The poet alone knows
astronomy, chemistry, vegetation and animation, for he does not stop at
these facts, but employs them as signs. He knows why the plain or meadow
of space was strewn with these flowers we call suns and moons and stars;
why the great deep is adorned with animals, with men, and gods; for in
every word he speaks he rides on them as the horses of thought.</p>
<p>By virtue of this science the poet is the Namer or Language-maker, naming
things sometimes after their appearance, sometimes after their essence,
and giving to every one its own name and not another's, thereby rejoicing
the intellect, which delights in detachment or boundary. The poets made
all the words, and therefore language is the archives of history, and, if
we must say it, a sort of tomb of the muses. For though the origin of most
of our words is forgotten, each word was at first a stroke of genius, and
obtained currency because for the moment it symbolized the world to the
first speaker and to the hearer. The etymologist finds the deadest word to
have been once a brilliant picture. Language is fossil poetry. As the
limestone of the continent consists of infinite masses of the shells of
animalcules, so language is made up of images or tropes, which now, in
their secondary use, have long ceased to remind us of their poetic origin.
But the poet names the thing because he sees it, or comes one step nearer
to it than any other. This expression or naming is not art, but a second
nature, grown out of the first, as a leaf out of a tree. What we call
nature is a certain self-regulated motion or change; and nature does all
things by her own hands, and does not leave another to baptize her but
baptizes herself; and this through the metamorphosis again. I remember
that a certain poet described it to me thus:</p>
<p>Genius is the activity which repairs the decays of things, whether wholly
or partly of a material and finite kind. Nature, through all her kingdoms,
insures herself. Nobody cares for planting the poor fungus; so she shakes
down from the gills of one agaric countless spores, any one of which,
being preserved, transmits new billions of spores to-morrow or next day.
The new agaric of this hour has a chance which the old one had not. This
atom of seed is thrown into a new place, not subject to the accidents
which destroyed its parent two rods off. She makes a man; and having
brought him to ripe age, she will no longer run the risk of losing this
wonder at a blow, but she detaches from him a new self, that the kind may
be safe from accidents to which the individual is exposed. So when the
soul of the poet has come to ripeness of thought, she detaches and sends
away from it its poems or songs,—a fearless, sleepless, deathless
progeny, which is not exposed to the accidents of the weary kingdom of
time; a fearless, vivacious offspring, clad with wings (such was the
virtue of the soul out of which they came) which carry them fast and far,
and infix them irrecoverably into the hearts of men. These wings are the
beauty of the poet's soul. The songs, thus flying immortal from their
mortal parent, are pursued by clamorous flights of censures, which swarm
in far greater numbers and threaten to devour them; but these last are not
winged. At the end of a very short leap they fall plump down and rot,
having received from the souls out of which they came no beautiful wings.
But the melodies of the poet ascend and leap and pierce into the deeps of
infinite time.</p>
<p>So far the bard taught me, using his freer speech. But nature has a higher
end, in the production of New individuals, than security, namely
ascension, or the passage of the soul into higher forms. I knew in my
younger days the sculptor who made the statue of the youth which stands in
the public garden. He was, as I remember, unable to tell directly, what
made him happy or unhappy, but by wonderful indirections he could tell. He
rose one day, according to his habit, before the dawn, and saw the morning
break, grand as the eternity out of which it came, and for many days
after, he strove to express this tranquillity, and lo! his chisel had
fashioned out of marble the form of a beautiful youth, Phosphorus, whose
aspect is such that it is said all persons who look on it become silent.
The poet also resigns himself to his mood, and that thought which agitated
him is expressed, but alter idem, in a manner totally new. The expression
is organic, or the new type which things themselves take when liberated.
As, in the sun, objects paint their images on the retina of the eye, so
they, sharing the aspiration of the whole universe, tend to paint a far
more delicate copy of their essence in his mind. Like the metamorphosis of
things into higher organic forms is their change into melodies. Over
everything stands its daemon or soul, and, as the form of the thing is
reflected by the eye, so the soul of the thing is reflected by a melody.
The sea, the mountain-ridge, Niagara, and every flower-bed, pre-exist, or
super-exist, in pre-cantations, which sail like odors in the air, and when
any man goes by with an ear sufficiently fine, he overhears them and
endeavors to write down the notes without diluting or depraving them. And
herein is the legitimation of criticism, in the mind's faith that the
poems are a corrupt version of some text in nature with which they ought
to be made to tally. A rhyme in one of our sonnets should not be less
pleasing than the iterated nodes of a sea-shell, or the resembling
difference of a group of flowers. The pairing of the birds is an idyl, not
tedious as our idyls are; a tempest is a rough ode, without falsehood or
rant; a summer, with its harvest sown, reaped, and stored, is an epic
song, subordinating how many admirably executed parts. Why should not the
symmetry and truth that modulate these, glide into our spirits, and we
participate the invention of nature?</p>
<p>This insight, which expresses itself by what is called Imagination, is a
very high sort of seeing, which does not come by study, but by the
intellect being where and what it sees; by sharing the path or circuit of
things through forms, and so making them translucid to others. The path of
things is silent. Will they suffer a speaker to go with them? A spy they
will not suffer; a lover, a poet, is the transcendency of their own
nature,—him they will suffer. The condition of true naming, on the
poet's part, is his resigning himself to the divine aura which breathes
through forms, and accompanying that.</p>
<p>It is a secret which every intellectual man quickly learns, that, beyond
the energy of his possessed and conscious intellect he is capable of a new
energy (as of an intellect doubled on itself), by abandonment to the
nature of things; that beside his privacy of power as an individual man,
there is a great public power on which he can draw, by unlocking, at all
risks, his human doors, and suffering the ethereal tides to roll and
circulate through him; then he is caught up into the life of the Universe,
his speech is thunder, his thought is law, and his words are universally
intelligible as the plants and animals. The poet knows that he speaks
adequately then only when he speaks somewhat wildly, or, "with the flower
of the mind;" not with the intellect used as an organ, but with the
intellect released from all service and suffered to take its direction
from its celestial life; or as the ancients were wont to express
themselves, not with intellect alone but with the intellect inebriated by
nectar. As the traveller who has lost his way throws his reins on his
horse's neck and trusts to the instinct of the animal to find his road, so
must we do with the divine animal who carries us through this world. For
if in any manner we can stimulate this instinct, new passages are opened
for us into nature; the mind flows into and through things hardest and
highest, and the metamorphosis is possible.</p>
<p>This is the reason why bards love wine, mead, narcotics, coffee, tea,
opium, the fumes of sandal-wood and tobacco, or whatever other procurers
of animal exhilaration. All men avail themselves of such means as they
can, to add this extraordinary power to their normal powers; and to this
end they prize conversation, music, pictures, sculpture, dancing,
theatres, travelling, war, mobs, fires, gaming, politics, or love, or
science, or animal intoxication,—which are several coarser or finer
quasi-mechanical substitutes for the true nectar, which is the ravishment
of the intellect by coming nearer to the fact. These are auxiliaries to
the centrifugal tendency of a man, to his passage out into free space, and
they help him to escape the custody of that body in which he is pent up,
and of that jail-yard of individual relations in which he is enclosed.
Hence a great number of such as were professionally expressers of Beauty,
as painters, poets, musicians, and actors, have been more than others wont
to lead a life of pleasure and indulgence; all but the few who received
the true nectar; and, as it was a spurious mode of attaining freedom, as
it was an emancipation not into the heavens but into the freedom of baser
places, they were punished for that advantage they won, by a dissipation
and deterioration. But never can any advantage be taken of nature by a
trick. The spirit of the world, the great calm presence of the Creator,
comes not forth to the sorceries of opium or of wine. The sublime vision
comes to the pure and simple soul in a clean and chaste body. That is not
an inspiration, which we owe to narcotics, but some counterfeit excitement
and fury. Milton says that the lyric poet may drink wine and live
generously, but the epic poet, he who shall sing of the gods and their
descent unto men, must drink water out of a wooden bowl. For poetry is not
'Devil's wine,' but God's wine. It is with this as it is with toys. We
fill the hands and nurseries of our children with all manner of dolls,
drums, and horses; withdrawing their eyes from the plain face and
sufficing objects of nature, the sun, and moon, the animals, the water,
and stones, which should be their toys. So the poet's habit of living
should be set on a key so low that the common influences should delight
him. His cheerfulness should be the gift of the sunlight; the air should
suffice for his inspiration, and he should be tipsy with water. That
spirit which suffices quiet hearts, which seems to come forth to such from
every dry knoll of sere grass, from every pine-stump and half-imbedded
stone on which the dull March sun shines, comes forth to the poor and
hungry, and such as are of simple taste. If thou fill thy brain with
Boston and New York, with fashion and covetousness, and wilt stimulate thy
jaded senses with wine and French coffee, thou shalt find no radiance of
wisdom in the lonely waste of the pinewoods.</p>
<p>If the imagination intoxicates the poet, it is not inactive in other men.
The metamorphosis excites in the beholder an emotion of joy. The use of
symbols has a certain power of emancipation and exhilaration for all men.
We seem to be touched by a wand which makes us dance and run about
happily, like children. We are like persons who come out of a cave or
cellar into the open air. This is the effect on us of tropes, fables,
oracles, and all poetic forms. Poets are thus liberating gods. Men have
really got a new sense, and found within their world another world, or
nest of worlds; for, the metamorphosis once seen, we divine that it does
not stop. I will not now consider how much this makes the charm of algebra
and the mathematics, which also have their tropes, but it is felt in every
definition; as when Aristotle defines space to be an immovable vessel in
which things are contained;—or when Plato defines a line to be a
flowing point; or figure to be a bound of solid; and many the like. What a
joyful sense of freedom we have when Vitruvius announces the old opinion
of artists that no architect can build any house well who does not know
something of anatomy. When Socrates, in Charmides, tells us that the soul
is cured of its maladies by certain incantations, and that these
incantations are beautiful reasons, from which temperance is generated in
souls; when Plato calls the world an animal; and Timaeus affirms that the
plants also are animals; or affirms a man to be a heavenly tree, growing
with his root, which is his head, upward; and, as George Chapman,
following him, writes,—</p>
<p>"So in our tree of man, whose nervie root<br/>
Springs in his top;"—<br/></p>
<p>when Orpheus speaks of hoariness as "that white flower which marks extreme
old age;" when Proclus calls the universe the statue of the intellect;
when Chaucer, in his praise of 'Gentilesse,' compares good blood in mean
condition to fire, which, though carried to the darkest house betwixt this
and the mount of Caucasus, will yet hold its natural office and burn as
bright as if twenty thousand men did it behold; when John saw, in the
Apocalypse, the ruin of the world through evil, and the stars fall from
heaven as the figtree casteth her untimely fruit; when Aesop reports the
whole catalogue of common daily relations through the masquerade of birds
and beasts;—we take the cheerful hint of the immortality of our
essence and its versatile habit and escapes, as when the gypsies say "it
is in vain to hang them, they cannot die."</p>
<p>The poets are thus liberating gods. The ancient British bards had for the
title of their order, "Those Who are free throughout the world." They are
free, and they make free. An imaginative book renders us much more service
at first, by stimulating us through its tropes, than afterward when we
arrive at the precise sense of the author. I think nothing is of any value
in books excepting the transcendental and extraordinary. If a man is
inflamed and carried away by his thought, to that degree that he forgets
the authors and the public and heeds only this one dream which holds him
like an insanity, let me read his paper, and you may have all the
arguments and histories and criticism. All the value which attaches to
Pythagoras, Paracelsus, Cornelius Agrippa, Cardan, Kepler, Swedenborg,
Schelling, Oken, or any other who introduces questionable facts into his
cosmogony, as angels, devils, magic, astrology, palmistry, mesmerism, and
so on, is the certificate we have of departure from routine, and that here
is a new witness. That also is the best success in conversation, the magic
of liberty, which puts the world like a ball in our hands. How cheap even
the liberty then seems; how mean to study, when an emotion communicates to
the intellect the power to sap and upheave nature; how great the
perspective! nations, times, systems, enter and disappear like threads in
tapestry of large figure and many colors; dream delivers us to dream, and
while the drunkenness lasts we will sell our bed, our philosophy, our
religion, in our opulence.</p>
<p>There is good reason why we should prize this liberation. The fate of the
poor shepherd, who, blinded and lost in the snow-storm, perishes in a
drift within a few feet of his cottage door, is an emblem of the state of
man. On the brink of the waters of life and truth, we are miserably dying.
The inaccessibleness of every thought but that we are in, is wonderful.
What if you come near to it; you are as remote when you are nearest as
when you are farthest. Every thought is also a prison; every heaven is
also a prison. Therefore we love the poet, the inventor, who in any form,
whether in an ode or in an action or in looks and behavior has yielded us
a new thought. He unlocks our chains and admits us to a new scene.</p>
<p>This emancipation is dear to all men, and the power to impart it, as it
must come from greater depth and scope of thought, is a measure of
intellect. Therefore all books of the imagination endure, all which ascend
to that truth that the writer sees nature beneath him, and uses it as his
exponent. Every verse or sentence possessing this virtue will take care of
its own immortality. The religions of the world are the ejaculations of a
few imaginative men.</p>
<p>But the quality of the imagination is to flow, and not to freeze. The poet
did not stop at the color or the form, but read their meaning; neither may
he rest in this meaning, but he makes the same objects exponents of his
new thought. Here is the difference betwixt the poet and the mystic, that
the last nails a symbol to one sense, which was a true sense for a moment,
but soon becomes old and false. For all symbols are fluxional; all
language is vehicular and transitive, and is good, as ferries and horses
are, for conveyance, not as farms and houses are, for homestead. Mysticism
consists in the mistake of an accidental and individual symbol for an
universal one. The morning-redness happens to be the favorite meteor to
the eyes of Jacob Behmen, and comes to stand to him for truth and faith;
and, he believes, should stand for the same realities to every reader. But
the first reader prefers as naturally the symbol of a mother and child, or
a gardener and his bulb, or a jeweller polishing a gem. Either of these,
or of a myriad more, are equally good to the person to whom they are
significant. Only they must be held lightly, and be very willingly
translated into the equivalent terms which others use. And the mystic must
be steadily told,—All that you say is just as true without the
tedious use of that symbol as with it. Let us have a little algebra,
instead of this trite rhetoric,—universal signs, instead of these
village symbols,—and we shall both be gainers. The history of
hierarchies seems to show that all religious error consisted in making the
symbol too stark and solid, and was at last nothing but an excess of the
organ of language.</p>
<p>Swedenborg, of all men in the recent ages, stands eminently for the
translator of nature into thought. I do not know the man in history to
whom things stood so uniformly for words. Before him the metamorphosis
continually plays. Everything on which his eye rests, obeys the impulses
of moral nature. The figs become grapes whilst he eats them. When some of
his angels affirmed a truth, the laurel twig which they held blossomed in
their hands. The noise which at a distance appeared like gnashing and
thumping, on coming nearer was found to be the voice of disputants. The
men in one of his visions, seen in heavenly light, appeared like dragons,
and seemed in darkness; but to each other they appeared as men, and when
the light from heaven shone into their cabin, they complained of the
darkness, and were compelled to shut the window that they might see.</p>
<p>There was this perception in him which makes the poet or seer an object of
awe and terror, namely that the same man or society of men may wear one
aspect to themselves and their companions, and a different aspect to
higher intelligences. Certain priests, whom he describes as conversing
very learnedly together, appeared to the children who were at some
distance, like dead horses; and many the like misappearances. And
instantly the mind inquires whether these fishes under the bridge, yonder
oxen in the pasture, those dogs in the yard, are immutably fishes, oxen,
and dogs, or only so appear to me, and perchance to themselves appear
upright men; and whether I appear as a man to all eyes. The Bramins and
Pythagoras propounded the same question, and if any poet has witnessed the
transformation he doubtless found it in harmony with various experiences.
We have all seen changes as considerable in wheat and caterpillars. He is
the poet and shall draw us with love and terror, who sees through the
flowing vest the firm nature, and can declare it.</p>
<p>I look in vain for the poet whom I describe. We do not with sufficient
plainness or sufficient profoundness address ourselves to life, nor dare
we chaunt our own times and social circumstance. If we filled the day with
bravery, we should not shrink from celebrating it. Time and nature yield
us many gifts, but not yet the timely man, the new religion, the
reconciler, whom all things await. Dante's praise is that he dared to
write his autobiography in colossal cipher, or into universality. We have
yet had no genius in America, with tyrannous eye, which knew the value of
our incomparable materials, and saw, in the barbarism and materialism of
the times, another carnival of the same gods whose picture he so much
admires in Homer; then in the Middle Age; then in Calvinism. Banks and
tariffs, the newspaper and caucus, Methodism and Unitarianism, are flat
and dull to dull people, but rest on the same foundations of wonder as the
town of Troy and the temple of Delphi, and are as swiftly passing away.
Our logrolling, our stumps and their politics, our fisheries, our Negroes
and Indians, our boats and our repudiations, the wrath of rogues and the
pusillanimity of honest men, the northern trade, the southern planting,
the western clearing, Oregon and Texas, are yet unsung. Yet America is a
poem in our eyes; its ample geography dazzles the imagination, and it will
not wait long for metres. If I have not found that excellent combination
of gifts in my countrymen which I seek, neither could I aid myself to fix
the idea of the poet by reading now and then in Chalmers's collection of
five centuries of English poets. These are wits more than poets, though
there have been poets among them. But when we adhere to the ideal of the
poet, we have our difficulties even with Milton and Homer. Milton is too
literary, and Homer too literal and historical.</p>
<p>But I am not wise enough for a national criticism, and must use the old
largeness a little longer, to discharge my errand from the muse to the
poet concerning his art.</p>
<p>Art is the path of the creator to his work. The paths or methods are ideal
and eternal, though few men ever see them; not the artist himself for
years, or for a lifetime, unless he come into the conditions. The painter,
the sculptor, the composer, the epic rhapsodist, the orator, all partake
one desire, namely to express themselves symmetrically and abundantly, not
dwarfishly and fragmentarily. They found or put themselves in certain
conditions, as, the painter and sculptor before some impressive human
figures; the orator, into the assembly of the people; and the others in
such scenes as each has found exciting to his intellect; and each
presently feels the new desire. He hears a voice, he sees a beckoning.
Then he is apprised, with wonder, what herds of daemons hem him in. He can
no more rest; he says, with the old painter, "By God, it is in me and must
go forth of me." He pursues a beauty, half seen, which flies before him.
The poet pours out verses in every solitude. Most of the things he says
are conventional, no doubt; but by and by he says something which is
original and beautiful. That charms him. He would say nothing else but
such things. In our way of talking we say 'That is yours, this is mine;'
but the poet knows well that it is not his; that it is as strange and
beautiful to him as to you; he would fain hear the like eloquence at
length. Once having tasted this immortal ichor, he cannot have enough of
it, and as an admirable creative power exists in these intellections, it
is of the last importance that these things get spoken. What a little of
all we know is said! What drops of all the sea of our science are baled
up! and by what accident it is that these are exposed, when so many
secrets sleep in nature! Hence the necessity of speech and song; hence
these throbs and heart-beatings in the orator, at the door of the
assembly, to the end namely that thought may be ejaculated as Logos, or
Word.</p>
<p>Doubt not, O poet, but persist. Say 'It is in me, and shall out.' Stand
there, balked and dumb, stuttering and stammering, hissed and hooted,
stand and strive, until at last rage draw out of thee that dream-power
which every night shows thee is thine own; a power transcending all limit
and privacy, and by virtue of which a man is the conductor of the whole
river of electricity. Nothing walks, or creeps, or grows, or exists, which
must not in turn arise and walk before him as exponent of his meaning.
Comes he to that power, his genius is no longer exhaustible. All the
creatures by pairs and by tribes pour into his mind as into a Noah's ark,
to come forth again to people a new world. This is like the stock of air
for our respiration or for the combustion of our fireplace; not a measure
of gallons, but the entire atmosphere if wanted. And therefore the rich
poets, as Homer, Chaucer, Shakspeare, and Raphael, have obviously no
limits to their works except the limits of their lifetime, and resemble a
mirror carried through the street, ready to render an image of every
created thing.</p>
<p>O poet! a new nobility is conferred in groves and pastures, and not in
castles or by the sword-blade any longer. The conditions are hard, but
equal. Thou shalt leave the world, and know the muse only. Thou shalt not
know any longer the times, customs, graces, politics, or opinions of men,
but shalt take all from the muse. For the time of towns is tolled from the
world by funereal chimes, but in nature the universal hours are counted by
succeeding tribes of animals and plants, and by growth of joy on joy. God
wills also that thou abdicate a manifold and duplex life, and that thou be
content that others speak for thee. Others shall be thy gentlemen and
shall represent all courtesy and worldly life for thee; others shall do
the great and resounding actions also. Thou shalt lie close hid with
nature, and canst not be afforded to the Capitol or the Exchange. The
world is full of renunciations and apprenticeships, and this is thine:
thou must pass for a fool and a churl for a long season. This is the
screen and sheath in which Pan has protected his well-beloved flower, and
thou shalt be known only to thine own, and they shall console thee with
tenderest love. And thou shalt not be able to rehearse the names of thy
friends in thy verse, for an old shame before the holy ideal. And this is
the reward; that the ideal shall be real to thee, and the impressions of
the actual world shall fall like summer rain, copious, but not
troublesome, to thy invulnerable essence. Thou shalt have the whole land
for thy park and manor, the sea for thy bath and navigation, without tax
and without envy; the woods and the rivers thou shalt own; and thou shalt
possess that wherein others are only tenants and boarders. Thou true
land-lord! sea-lord! air-lord! Wherever snow falls or water flows or birds
fly, wherever day and night meet in twilight, wherever the blue heaven is
hung by clouds or sown with stars, wherever are forms with transparent
boundaries, wherever are outlets into celestial space, wherever is danger,
and awe, and love,—there is Beauty, plenteous as rain, shed for
thee, and though thou shouldest walk the world over, thou shalt not be
able to find a condition inopportune or ignoble.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><br/><br/><br/></p>
<p>EXPERIENCE.<br/>
<br/>
THE lords of life, the lords of life,—<br/>
I saw them pass,<br/>
In their own guise,<br/>
Like and unlike,<br/>
Portly and grim,<br/>
Use and Surprise,<br/>
Surface and Dream,<br/>
Succession swift, and spectral Wrong,<br/>
Temperament without a tongue,<br/>
And the inventor of the game<br/>
Omnipresent without name;—<br/>
Some to see, some to be guessed,<br/>
They marched from east to west:<br/>
Little man, least of all,<br/>
Among the legs of his guardians tall,<br/>
Walked about with puzzled look:—<br/>
Him by the hand dear Nature took;<br/>
Dearest Nature, strong and kind,<br/>
Whispered, 'Darling, never mind!<br/>
Tomorrow they will wear another face,<br/>
The founder thou! these are thy race!'<br/></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />