<SPAN name="chap14"></SPAN>
<h3> XIV. CHOPIN THE CONQUEROR </h3>
<p>The Scherzi of Chopin are of his own creation; the type as illustrated
by Beethoven and Mendelssohn had no meaning for him. Whether in earnest
or serious jest, Chopin pitched on a title that is widely misleading
when the content is considered. The Beethoven Scherzo is full of a
robust sort of humor. In it he is seldom poetical, frequently given to
gossip, and at times he hints at the mystery of life. The demoniacal
element, the fierce jollity that mocks itself, the almost titanic anger
of Chopin would not have been regarded by the composer of the Eroica
Symphony as adapted to the form. The Pole practically built up a new
musical structure, boldly called it a Scherzo, and, as in the case of
the Ballades, poured into its elastic mould most disturbing and
incomparable music.</p>
<p>Chopin seldom compasses sublimity. His arrows are tipped with fire, yet
they do not fly far. But in some of his music he skirts the regions
where abide the gods. In at least one Scherzo, in one Ballade, in the F
minor Fantaisie, in the first two movements of the B flat minor Sonata,
in several of the Eludes, and in one of the Preludes, he compasses
grandeur. Individuality of utterance, beauty of utterance, and the
eloquence we call divine are his; criticism then bows its questioning
brows before this anointed one. In the Scherzi Chopin is often prophet
as well as poet. He fumes and frets, but upon his countenance is the
precious fury of the sibyls. We see the soul that suffers from secret
convulsions, but forgive the writhing for the music made. These four
Scherzi are psychical records, confessions committed to paper of
outpourings that never could have passed the lips. From these alone we
may almost reconstruct the real Chopin, the inner Chopin, whose
conventional exterior so ill prepared the world for the tragic issues
of his music.</p>
<p>The first Scherzo is a fair model. There are a few bars of
introduction—the porch, as Niecks would call it—a principal subject,
a trio, a short working-out section, a skilful return to the opening
theme, and an elaborate coda. This edifice, not architecturally
flawless, is better adapted to the florid beauties of Byzantine
treatment than to the severe Hellenic line. Yet Chopin gave it dignity,
largeness and a classic massiveness. The interior is romantic, is
modern, personal, but the facade shows gleaming minarets, the strangely
builded shapes of the Orient. This B minor Scherzo has the acid note of
sorrow and revolt, yet the complex figuration never wavers. The walls
stand firm despite the hurricane blowing through and around them.
Ehlert finds this Scherzo tornadic. It is gusty, and the hurry and
over-emphasis do not endear it to the pianist. The first pages are
filled with wrathful sounds, there is much tossing of hands and cries
to heaven, calling down its fire and brimstone. A climax mounts to a
fine frenzy until the lyric intermezzo in B is reached. Here love
chants with honeyed tongues. The widely dispersed figure of the melody
has an entrancing tenderness. But peace does not long prevail against
the powers of Eblis, and infernal is the Wilde Jagd of the finale.
After shrillest of dissonances, a chromatic uproar pilots the doomed
one across this desperate Styx.</p>
<p>What Chopin's programme was we can but guess. He may have outlined the
composition in a moment of great ebullition, a time of soul laceration
arising from a cat scratch or a quarrel with Maurice Sand in the garden
over the possession of the goat cart.</p>
<p>The Klindworth edition is preferable. Kullak follows his example in
using the double note stems in the B major part. He gives the A sharp
in the bass six bars before the return of the first motif. Klindworth,
and other editions, prescribe A natural, which is not so effective.
This Scherzo might profit by being played without the repeats. The
chromatic interlocked octaves at the close are very striking.</p>
<p>I find at times—as my mood changes—something almost repellant in the
B minor Scherzo. It does not present the frank physiognomy of the
second Scherzo, op. 31, in B flat minor. Ehlert cries that it was
composed in a blessed hour, although de Lenz quotes Chopin as saying of
the opening, "It must be a charnel house." The defiant challenge of the
beginning has no savor of the scorn and drastic mockery of its
fore-runner. We are conscious that tragedy impends, that after the
prologue may follow fast catastrophe. Yet it is not feared with all the
portentous thunder of its index. Nor are we deceived. A melody of
winning distinction unrolls before us. It has a noble tone, is of a
noble type. Without relaxing pace it passes and drops like a
thunderbolt into the bowels of the earth. Again the story is told, and
tarrying not at all we are led to a most delectable spot in the key of
A major. This trio is marked by genius. Can anything be more bewitching
than the episode in C sharp minor merging into E major, with the
overflow at the close? The fantasy is notable for variety of tonality,
freedom in rhythmical incidents and genuine power. The coda is dizzy
and overwhelming. For Schumann this Scherzo is Byronic in tenderness
and boldness. Karasowski speaks of its Shakespearian humor, and indeed
it is a very human and lovable piece of art. It holds richer, warmer,
redder blood than the other three and like the A flat Ballade, is
beloved of the public. But then it is easier to understand.</p>
<p>Opus 39, the third Scherzo in C sharp minor, was composed or finished
at Majorca and is the most dramatic of the set. I confess to see no
littleness in the polished phrases, though irony lurks in its bars and
there is fever in its glance—a glance full of enigmatic and luring
scorn. I heartily agree with Hadow, who finds the work clear cut and of
exact balance. And noting that Chopin founded whole paragraphs "either
on a single phrase repeated in similar shapes or on two phrases in
alternation"—a primitive practice in Polish folksongs—he asserts that
"Beethoven does not attain the lucidity of his style by such
parallelism of phraseology," but admits that Chopin's methods made for
"clearness and precision...may be regarded as characteristic of the
national manner." A thoroughly personal characteristic too.</p>
<p>There is virile clangor in the firmly struck octaves of the opening
pages. No hesitating, morbid view of life, but rank, harsh
assertiveness, not untinged with splenetic anger. The chorale of the
trio is admirably devised and carried out. Its piety is a bit of
liturgical make-believe. The contrasts here are most artistic—sonorous
harmonies set off by broken chords that deliciously tinkle. There is a
coda of frenetic movement and the end is in major, a surprising
conclusion when considering all that has gone before. Never to become
the property of the profane, the C sharp minor Scherzo, notwithstanding
its marked asperities and agitated moments, is a great work of art.
Without the inner freedom of its predecessor, it is more sober and
self-contained than the B minor Scherzo.</p>
<p>The fourth Scherzo, op. 54, is in the key of E. Built up by a series of
cunning touches and climaxes and without the mood depth or variety of
its brethren, it is more truly a Scherzo than any of them. It has
tripping lightness and there is sunshine imprisoned behind its open
bars. Of it Schumann could not ask, "How is gravity to clothe itself if
jest goes about in dark veils?" Here, then, is intellectual refinement
and jesting of a superior sort. Niecks thinks it fragmentary. I find
the fairy-like measures delightful after the doleful mutterings of some
of the other Scherzi. There is the same "spirit of opposition," but of
arrogance none. The C sharp minor theme is of lyric beauty, the coda
with its scales, brilliant. It seems to be banned by classicists and
Chopin worshippers alike. The agnostic attitude is not yet dead in the
piano playing world.</p>
<p>Rubinstein most admired the first two Scherzi. The B minor has been
criticised for being too much in the etude vein. But with all their
shortcomings these compositions are without peer in the literature of
the piano.</p>
<p>They were published and dedicated as follows: Op. 20, February, 1835,
to M. T. Albrecht; op. 31, December, 1837, Comtesse de Furstenstein;
op. 39, October, 1840, Adolph Gutmann, and op. 54, December, 1843,
Mile, de Caraman. De Lenz relates that Chopin dedicated the C sharp
minor Scherzo to his pupil Gutmann, because this giant, with a prize
fighter's fist, could "knock a hole in the table" with a certain chord
for the left hand—sixth measure from the beginning—and adds quite
naively: "Nothing more was ever heard of this Gutmann—he was a
discovery of Chopin's." Chopin died in this same Gutmann's arms, and,
despite de Lenz, Gutmann was in evidence until his death as a "favorite
pupil."</p>
<p>And now we have reached the grandest—oh, banal and abused word—of
Chopin's compositions, the Fantaisie in F minor, op. 49. Robert
Schumann, after remarking that the cosmopolitan must "sacrifice the
small interests of the soil on which he was born," notices that
Chopin's later works "begin to lose something of their especial
Sarmatian physiognomy, to approach partly more nearly the universal
ideal cultivated by the divine Greeks which we find again in Mozart."
The F minor Fantaisie has hardly the Mozartian serenity, but parades a
formal beauty—not disfigured by an excess of violence, either personal
or patriotic, and its melodies, if restless by melancholy, are of
surprising nobility and dramatic grandeur. Without including the
Beethoven Sonatas, not strictly born of the instrument, I do not fear
to maintain that this Fantaisie is one of the greatest of piano pieces.
Never properly appreciated by pianists, critics, or public, it is,
after more than a half century of neglect, being understood at last. It
was published November, 1843, and probably composed at Nohant, as a
letter of the composer indicates. The dedication is to Princesse C. de
Souzzo—these interminable countesses and princesses of Chopin! For
Niecks, who could not at first discern its worth, it suggests a Titan
in commotion. It is Titanic; the torso of some Faust-like dream, it is
Chopin's Faust. A macabre march, containing some dangerous dissonances,
gravely ushers us to ascending staircases of triplets, only to
precipitate us to the very abysses of the piano. That first subject, is
it not almost as ethically puissant and passionate as Beethoven in his
F minor Sonata? Chopin's lack of tenaciousness is visible here.
Beethoven would have built a cathedral on such a foundational scheme,
but Chopin, ever prodigal in his melody making, dashes impetuously to
the A flat episode, that heroic love chant, erroneously marked dolce
and played with the effeminacies of a salon. Three times does it
resound in this strange Hall of Glancing Mirrors, yet not once should
it be caressed. The bronze fingers of a Tausig are needed. Now are
arching the triplets to the great, thrilling song, beginning in C
minor, and then the octaves, in contrary motion, split wide asunder the
very earth. After terrific chordal reverberations there is the rapid
retreat of vague armies, and once again is begun the ascent of the
rolling triplets to inaccessible heights, and the first theme sounds in
C minor. The modulation lifts to G flat, only to drop to abysmal
depths. What mighty, desperate cause is being espoused? When peace is
presaged in the key of B, is this the prize for which strive these
agonized hosts? Is some forlorn princess locked behind these solemn,
inaccessible bars? For a few moments there is contentment beyond all
price. Then the warring tribe of triplets recommence, after clamorous G
flat octaves reeling from the stars to the sea of the first theme.
Another rush into D flat ensues, the song of C minor reappears in F
minor, and the miracle is repeated. Oracular octaves quake the
cellarage of the palace, the warriors hurry by, their measured tramp is
audible after they vanish, and the triplets obscure their retreat with
chromatic vapors. Then an adagio in this fantastic old world tale—the
curtain prepares to descend—a faint, sweet voice sings a short,
appealing cadenza, and after billowing A flat arpeggios, soft, great
hummocks of tone, two giant chords are sounded, and the Ballade of Love
and War is over. Who conquers? Is the Lady with the Green Eyes and Moon
White Face rescued? Or is all this a De Quincey's Dream Fugue
translated into tone—a sonorous, awesome vision? Like De Quincey, it
suggests the apparition of the empire of fear, the fear that is
secretly felt with dreams, wherein the spirit expands to the drummings
of infinite space.</p>
<p>Alas! for the validity of subjective criticism. Franz Liszt told
Vladimir de Pachmann the programme of the Fantaisie, as related to him
by Chopin. At the close of one desperate, immemorial day, the pianist
was crooning at the piano, his spirits vastly depressed. Suddenly came
a knocking at his door, a Poe-like, sinister tapping, which he at once
rhythmically echoed upon the keyboard, his phono-motor centre being
unusually sensitive. The first two bars of the Fantaisie describe these
rappings, just as the third and fourth stand for Chopin's musical
invitation, entrez, entrez! This is all repeated until the doors wide
open swinging admit Liszt, George Sand, Madame Camille Pleyel nee Mock,
and others. To the solemn measures of the march they enter, and range
themselves about Chopin, who after the agitated triplets begins his
complaint in the mysterious song in F minor. But Sand, with whom he has
quarrelled, falls before him on her knees and pleads for pardon.
Straightway the chant merges into the appealing A flat section—this
sends skyward my theory of its interpretation—and from C minor the
current becomes more tempestuous until the climax is reached and to the
second march the intruders rapidly vanish. The remainder of the work,
with the exception of the Lento Sostenuto in B—where it is to be hoped
Chopin's perturbed soul finds momentary peace—is largely repetition
and development. This far from ideal reading is an authoritative one,
coming as it does from Chopin by way of Liszt. I console myself for its
rather commonplace character with the notion that perhaps in the
re-telling the story has caught some personal cadenzas of the two
historians. In any case I shall cling to my own version.</p>
<p>The F minor Fantaisie will mean many things to many people. Chopin has
never before maintained so artistically, so free from delirium, such a
level of strong passion, mental power and exalted euphony. It is his
largest canvas, and though there are no long-breathed periods such as
in the B flat minor Scherzo, the phraseology is amply broad, without
padding of paragraphs. The rapt interest is not relaxed until the final
bar. This transcendental work more nearly approaches Beethoven in its
unity, its formal rectitude and its brave economy of thematic material.</p>
<p>While few men have dared to unlock their hearts thus, Chopin is not so
intimate here as in the mazurkas. But the pulse beats ardently in the
tissues of this composition. As art for art, it is less perfect; the
gain is on the human side. Nearing his end Chopin discerned, with ever
widening, ever brighter vision, the great heart throb of the universe.
Master of his material, if not of his mortal tenement, he passionately
strove to shape his dreams into abiding sounds. He did not always
succeed, but his victories are the precious prizes of mankind. One is
loath to believe that the echo of Chopin's magic music can ever fall
upon unheeding ears. He may become old-fashioned, but, like Mozart, he
will remain eternally beautiful.</p>
<br/><br/><br/>
<SPAN name="biblio"></SPAN>
<h3> BIBLIOGRAPHY </h3>
<p>
Frederic Chopin as a Man and Musician, by Frederick Niecks.
London, Novello, Ewer & Co.</p>
<p>
Frederic Chopin, by Franz Liszt. London, W. Reeves.</p>
<p>
Life and Letters of Frederic Chopin, by Moritz Karasowski,
translated from the Russian by Emily Hill. London, W. Reeves.</p>
<p>
Chopin and Other Musical Essays, by Henry T. Finck. New York,
Charles Scribner's Sons.</p>
<p>
The Works of Frederic Chopin and their Proper Interpretation,
by Jean Kleczynski, translated by A. Whittingham. London, W.
Reeves.</p>
<p>
Chopin's Greater Works, by Jean Kleczynski, translated with
additions by Natalie Janotha. New York, Charles Scribner's
Sons.</p>
<p>
Frederic Francois Chopin, by Charles Willeby. London, Sampson
Low, Marston & Co.</p>
<p>
Frederic Chopin, by Joseph Bennett. Novello, Ewer & Co.</p>
<p>
F. Chopin, la Tradicion de su Musica, por Eduardo Gariel. City
of Mexico, 1894.</p>
<p>
Frederic Chopin, sa Vie et ses OEuvres, par Madame A. Audley.
Paris, E. Plon et Cie.</p>
<p>
F. Chopin, Essai de Critique musicale, par H. Barbedette.
Friedrich Chopin und seine Werke, von Dr. J. Schucht. Leipzig,
C. F. Kahnt.</p>
<p>
Friedrich Chopin's Leben und Werke, von A. Niggli. Leipzig,
Breitkopf & Hartel.</p>
<p>
Chopin, by Francis Hueffer, in Musical Studies. Edinburgh, A.
& C. Black.</p>
<p>
Frederic Chopin, by W. H. Hadow, in Studies in Modern Music.
New York, Macmillan Co.</p>
<p>
Frederic Chopin, by Louis Ehlert, in From the Tone World,
translated by Helen D. Tretbar. New York.</p>
<p>
Chopin, by W. de Lenz, from The Great Piano Virtuosos of our
Time, translated by Madeleine R. Baker. New York, G. Schirmer.</p>
<p>
Chopin, in Robert Schumann's Music and Musicians, translated
by Fanny Raymond Ritter. New York, Schuberth & Co.</p>
<p>
Chopin, in Anton Rubinstein's Conversation on Music,
translated by Mrs. John P. Morgan. Steinway Hall: Charles F.
Tretbar, publisher.</p>
<p>
Les Musiciens Polonais, par Albert Sowinski. Paris, Le Clerc.</p>
<p>
Les Trois Romans de Frederic Chopin, par le Comte Wodinski.
Paris, Calman Levy.</p>
<p>
Une Contemporaine, par M. Brault.</p>
<p>
Histoire de ma Vie et Correspondance, par George Sand. Paris,
Calman Levy.</p>
<p>
George Sand, by Henry James in French Poets and Novelists. New
York, Macmillan Co.</p>
<p>
G. Sand, par Stefane-Pol, from Trois Grandes Figures, preface
by D'Armand Silvestre. Paris, Ernest Flammarian.</p>
<p>
George Sand, sa Vie et ses OEuvres, par Wladimir Kardnine.
Paris, Ollendorf.</p>
<p>
Deux Eleves de Chopin, par Adolphe Brisson.</p>
<p>
The Beautiful in Music, by Dr. Eduard Hanslick. Translated by
Gustave Cohen. Novello, Ewer & Co., London and New York.</p>
<p>
How Music Developed, by W. J. Henderson. New York, Frederick
A. Stokes Co.</p>
<p>
Wagner and His Works, by Henry T. Finck. New York, Charles
Scribner's Sons.</p>
<p>
By the Way, by William F. Apthorp. Boston, Copeland & Day.</p>
<p>
A Study of Wagner, by Ernest Newman. New York, G. P. Putnam's
Sons.</p>
<p>
Folk-Music Studies, by H. E. Krehbiel. New York Tribune,
August, 1899.</p>
<p>
Analytical Notes to Schlesinger Edition, by Theodor Kullak.</p>
<p>
The New Spirit, by Havelock Ellis. London, Walter Scott, Ltd.</p>
<p>
Flaubert, par Emile Faguet. Paris, Hachette et Cie.</p>
<p>
Reisebilder, by Heinrich Heine.</p>
<p>
Affirmations, by Havelock Ellis. London, Walter Scott.</p>
<p>
The Psychology of the Emotions, by Th. Ribot. New York,
Charles Scribner's Sons.</p>
<p>
The Man of Genius, by Cesare Lombroso. New York, Charles
Scribner's Sons.</p>
<p>
The Musical Courier, New York. Files from 1889 to 1900.</p>
<p>
Chopin's Works, by Rutland Boughton, in London Musical
Standard.</p>
<p>
Chopin, by Stanislas Count Tarnowski. Translated from the
Polish by Natalie Janotha. 1899.</p>
<p>
The School of Giorgione, An Essay by Walter Pater.</p>
<p>
Chopin and the Sick Men, by John F. Runciman, in London
Saturday Review, September 9, 1899.</p>
<p>
Frederick Chopin, by Edward Dannreuther from Famous Composers
and their Works. Boston, J. B. Millet Company.</p>
<p>
Primitive Music, by Wallaschek.</p>
<p>
Zur Psychologie des Individuums, Chopin und Nietzsche, by
Stanislaw Przybyszewski. Berlin, W. Fontaine & Co., 1892.</p>
<p>
Musical Interpretation, by Adolph Carpe. Leipzig, London and
Paris, Bosworth & Co., Boston, B. F. Wood Music Co.</p>
<p>
Pianistes Celebres, par Francois Marmontel.</p>
<p>
Frederyka Chopina, in Echo Musicale, Warsaw, Poland, October
15, 1899.</p>
<p>
OEuvres Poetiques Completes de Adam Mickiewicz, Traduction du
Polonais par Christien Ostrowski. Paris, Firmin Didot Freres,
Fils et Cie, 1859.</p>
<p>
The World as Will and Idea, by Arthur Schopenhauer.</p>
<p>
The Case of Richard Wagner, by Friedrich Nietzsche. New York,
Macmillan Co.</p>
<p>
With the Immortals, by Marion Crawford. References to Chopin.</p>
<p>
Preface to Isidor Philipp's Exercises Quotidiens tires des
OEuvres de Chopin, by Georges Mathias. Paris, J. Hamelle.</p>
<p>
Pianoforte Study, by Alexander McArthur.</p>
<p>
Chopin Ein Gedenkblatt, by August Spanuth, New York Staats-Zeitung,
October 15, 1899.</p>
<p>
The Pianoforte Sonata, by J. B. Shedlock, London, Methuen &
Co.</p>
<p>
A History of Pianoforte Playing and Pianoforte Literature, by
C. F. Weitzmann, translated by Dr. Th. Baker. New York, G.
Schirmer.</p>
<p>
Der Letze Virtuoso, by C. F. Weitzmann. Leipzig, Kahnt.</p>
<p>
Chopin—and Some Others, in London Musical News, October 14,
1899.</p>
<p>
Chopin, in A History of the Pianoforte and Pianoforte Players,
by Oscar Bie. New York, E. P. Dutton & Co.</p>
<p>
Chopin, in Rubinstein's Die Meister des Klaviers. New York,
Schuberth.</p>
<p>
Chopin, in Berliner Tageblatt, by Dr. Leopold Schmidt.</p>
<p>
Chopin Juzgada por Schumann, in Gaceta Musical, City of
Mexico.</p>
<p>
The Chopin Rubato and so-called Chopin Fingering, by John
Kautz, in The Musical Record, Boston, 1898.</p>
<p>
Franz Liszt, by Lina Ramann. Breitkopf & Hartel.</p>
<p>
Preface to Mikuli Edition by Carl Mikuli.</p>
<p>
The AEsthetics of Pianoforte Playing, by Adolf Kullak. New
York, G. Schirmer.</p>
<p>
Chopin und die Frauen, by Eugen Isolani. Berliner Courier,
October 17, 1899.</p>
<p>
Chopin, by W. J. Henderson in The New York Times, October 29,
1899.</p>
<p>
A Note on Chopin, by L. A. Corbeille, and Chopin, An
Irresponsibility, by "Israfel," in The Dome, October, 1899,
London, Unicorn Press.</p>
<p>
Chopin and the Romantics, by John F. Runciman in The Saturday
Review (London), February 10,1900.</p>
<p>
Chopiniana: in the February, 1900, issue of the London Monthly
Musical Record, including some new letters of Chopin's.</p>
<p>
La maladie de Chopin (d'apres des documents inedits), par
Cabanes. Chronique medicale, Paris, 1899, vi., No. 21, 673-685.</p>
<p>
Also recollections in letters and diaries of Moscheles,
Hiller, Mendelssohn, Berlioz, Henselt, Schumann, Rubinstein,
Mathias, Legouve, Tarnowski, Grenier and others.</p>
<p>
The author begs to acknowledge the kind suggestions and
assistance of Rafael Joseffy, Vladimir de Pachmann, Moriz
Rosenthal, Jaraslow de Zielinski, Edwin W. Morse, Edward E.
Ziegler and Ignace Jan Paderewski.</p>
<br/><br/><br/>
<SPAN name="books"></SPAN>
<h3> BOOKS BY JAMES HUNEKER </h3>
<p>
What Maeterlinck wrote:</p>
<p>
Maurice Maeterlinck wrote thus of James Huneker: "Do you know
that 'Iconoclasts' is the only book of high and universal
critical worth that we have had for years—to be precise,
since Georg Brandes. It is at once strong and fine, supple and
firm, indulgent and sure."</p>
<p>
The Evening Post of June 10, 1915, wrote of Mr. Huneker's "The New
Cosmopolis":</p>
<p>
"The region of Bohemia, Mr. James Huneker found long ago, is
within us. At twenty, he says, he discovered that there is no
such enchanted spot as the Latin Quarter, but that every
generation sets back the mythical land into the golden age of
the Commune, or of 1848, or the days of 'Hernani.' It is the
same with New York's East Side, 'the fabulous East Side,' as
Mr. Huneker calls it in his collection of international urban
studies, 'The New Cosmopolis.' If one judged externals by
grime, by poverty, by sanded back-rooms, with long-haired
visionaries assailing the social order, then the East Side of
the early eighties has gone down before the mad rush of
settlement workers, impertinent reformers, sociological
cranks, self-advertising politicians, billionaire socialists,
and the reporters. To-day the sentimental traveller 'feels a
heart-pang to see the order, the cleanliness, the wide
streets, the playgrounds, the big boulevards, the absence of
indigence that have spoiled the most interesting part of New
York City.' But apparently this is only a first impression;
for Mr. Huneker had no trouble in discovering in one cafe a
patriarchal figure quite of the type beloved of the local-color
hunters of twenty years ago, a prophet, though speaking
a modern language and concerned with things of the day. So
that we owe to Mr. Huneker the discovery of a notable truth,
namely, that Bohemia is not only a creation of the sentimental
memory, but, being psychological, may be located in clean and
prosperous quarters. The tendency has always been to place it
in a golden age, but a tattered and unswept age. Bohemia is
now shown to exist amidst model tenements and sanitary
drinking-cups."</p>
<br/>
<p>
IVORY APES AND PEACOCKS With frontispiece portrait of Dostoievsky 12mo.
$1.50 net</p>
<br/>
<p>
NEW COSMOPOLIS 12mo. $1.50 net</p>
<br/>
<p>
THE PATHOS of DISTANCE A Book of a Thousand and One Moments 12mo. $2.00
net</p>
<br/>
<p>
PROMENADES of an IMPRESSIONIST 12mo. $1.50 net</p>
<p>
"We like best such sober essays as those which analyze for us
the technical contributions of Cezanne and Rodin. Here Mr.
Huneker is a real interpreter, and here his long experience of
men and ways in art counts for much. Charming, in the lighter
vein, are such appreciations as the Monticelli, and Chardin."</p>
<p>
—FRANK JEWETT MATHER, JR., in New York Nation and Evening
Post.</p>
<br/>
<p>
EGOISTS A Book of Supermen STENDHAL, BAUDELAIRE, FLAUBERT, ANATOLE
FRANCE, HUYSMANS, BARRES, HELLO, BLAKE, NIETZSCHE, IBSEN, AND MAX
STIRNER With Portrait and Facsimile Reproductions 12mo. $1.50 net</p>
<br/>
<p>
ICONOCLASTS: A Book of Dramatists 12mo. $1.50 net</p>
<p>
CONTENTS: Henrik Ibsen—August Strindberg—Henry Becque—
Gerhart Hauptmann—Paul Hervieu—The Quintessence of Shaw—
Maxim Gorky's Nachtasyl—Hermann Sudermann—Princess
Mathilde's Play—Duse and D'Annunzio—Villiers de l'Isle
Adam—Maurice Maeterlinck.</p>
<p>
"His style is a little jerky, but it is one of those rare
styles in which we are led to expect some significance, if not
wit, in every sentence."</p>
<p>
—G. K. CHESTERTON, in London Daily News.</p>
<br/>
<p>
OVERTONES: A Book of Temperaments WITH FRONTISPIECE PORTRAIT Of RICHARD
STRAUSS 12mo. $1.50 net</p>
<p>
"In some respects Mr. Huneker must be reckoned the most
brilliant of all living writers on matters musical."</p>
<p>
—Academy, London.</p>
<br/>
<p>
MEZZOTINTS IN MODERN MUSIC BRAHMS, TSCHAIKOWSKY, CHOPIN. RICHARD
STRAUSS, LISZT, AND WAGNER 12mo. $1.50 net</p>
<p>
"Mr. Huneker is, in the best sense, a critic; he listens to
the music and gives you his impressions as rapidly and in as
few words as possible; or he sketches the composers in fine,
broad, sweeping strokes with a magnificent disregard for
unimportant details. ... A distinctly original and very
valuable contribution to the world's tiny musical literature."</p>
<p>
—J. F. RUNCIMAN, in London Saturday Review.</p>
<br/>
<p>
FRANZ LISZT WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS 12mo. $2.00 net</p>
<br/>
<p>
CHOPIN: The Man and His Music WITH ETCHED PORTRAIT 12mo. $2.00 net</p>
<br/>
<p>
VISIONARIES 12 mo. $1.50 net</p>
<p>
CONTENTS: A Master of Cobwebs—The Eighth Deadly Sin—The
Puree of Aholibah—Rebels of the Moon—The Spiral Road—A Mock
Sun—Antichrist—The Eternal Duel—The Enchanted Yodler—The
Third Kingdom—The Haunted Harpsichord—The Tragic Wall—A
Sentimental Rebellion—Hall of the Missing Footsteps—The
Cursory Light—An Iron Fan—The Woman Who Loved Chopin—The
Tune of Time—Nada—Pan.</p>
<p>
"In 'The Spiral Road' and in some of the other stories both
fantasy and narrative may be compared with Hawthorne in his
most unearthly moods. The younger man has read his Nietzsche
and has cast off his heritage of simple morals. Hawthorne's
Puritanism finds no echo in these modern souls, all sceptical,
wavering and unblessed. But Hawthorne's splendor of vision and
his power of sympathy with a tormented mind do live again in
the best of Mr. Huneker's stories."</p>
<p>
—London Academy (Feb. 3, 1906).</p>
<br/>
<p>
MELOMANIACS 12mo. $1.50 net</p>
<p>
"It would be difficult to sum up 'Melomaniacs' in a phrase.
Never did a book, in my opinion at any rate, exhibit greater
contrasts, not, perhaps, of strength and weakness, but of
clearness and obscurity."</p>
<p>
—HAROLD E. GORST, in London Saturday Review.</p>
<br/><br/><br/><br/>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />