<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI"></SPAN>CHAPTER VI</h2>
<h3>THE BALKAN STATES</h3>
<p><b>The Balkans.</b>—As we have learned in Chapter I,
the Balkan states are, with the exception of Montenegro,
the result of a series of revolutions which took place
during the last hundred years. These revolutions were
the result of two causes. First there was a growing
restlessness of the different groups of people in the
Balkan peninsula. This was due not only to centuries
of Turkish misrule, but also to the influence of the
republican movement which developed in northern and
western Europe as a result of the French Revolution.
The second cause of the Balkan revolutions was the
gradual growth among the oppressed races of the feeling
that they would better their condition by throwing off
the despotic Turkish rule and by organizing each separate
race into a separate nation. Thus it was that the revolutions
brought into existence a group of small states, each
populated chiefly by one of the races inhabiting the
Balkans.</p>
<div class="figcenter"> <SPAN href="images/060.png"><ANTIMG src="images/thumb_060.png" width-obs="400" height-obs="632" alt="THE BALKAN STATES 1913" title="" /></SPAN> <span class="caption">THE BALKAN STATES 1913</span></div>
<p><b>Races in the Balkans.</b>—There are more races represented
in the Balkans than in any similar sized territory
in Europe. Most of the Balkan states lie along what
was the northeastern fringe of the Roman Empire.
So we find inhabiting them not only ancient races like
the Greeks and Albanians, but also descendants of
<span class="pagenum">[Pg 60]<SPAN name="Page_60" id="Page_60"></SPAN></span>Roman colonists like the Roumanians, and other
racial groups like the Serbs and Bulgars, which represent
the survivals of the barbarian invasions of the Middle
Ages. While the larger groups of invaders passed on<span class="pagenum">[Pg 61]<SPAN name="Page_61" id="Page_61"></SPAN></span>
to the west, these dropped out and moved southward
into the Balkan peninsula, where their descendants still
remain. We must not think that these are pure races.
There has been much intermixture, and to-day all of the
groups contain a strong Slavic element, although some
are rather unwilling to admit it. There is besides a
Turkish element in the population, as the result of the
long period of Turkish rule, especially in those districts
where many of the original inhabitants accepted Mohammedanism,
as in Albania and Macedonia.</p>
<p><b>The Slavs.</b>—The Serbs, a Slavic race, form the chief
part of the population in Serbia and Montenegro, as
well as in Bosnia and other parts of southern Austria-Hungary.
Together with the Croats and Slovenes of
southern Austria-Hungary, the Serbs are called the
Jugo-Slavs (yoo´go-slavz) or South-Slavs (<i>jugo</i> means
"south") to distinguish them from the Czechs, Poles,
and Russians of the north. There is, however, a strong
feeling of relationship between these two great Slavic
groups.</p>
<p><b>The Bulgars.</b>—The Bulgars are descended from a
non-Slavic race allied to the Tatars and Finns. They
came into the Balkan region on the heels of some of the
early migrations and seized the land now called Bulgaria;
there, however, they mingled with the native Slavic
<span class="pagenum">[Pg 62]<SPAN name="Page_62" id="Page_62"></SPAN></span>people whom they conquered, and whose language they
adopted. There are, besides, many Bulgarians in
the Dobrud´ja—the district lying between the lower
Danube and the Black Sea. Likewise in the province
of Macedonia, the Bulgarians form the largest element
in the population.</p>
<p><b>The Roumanians.</b>—Roumania is the old Roman
province of Dacia, and the Roumanians claim to be
descendants of colonists which the Romans sent into
that province as an outpost against invasion. It is
certain that the language spoken by the Roumanians is
much like Latin, but, as a recent writer says, the language
is closer to Latin than the Roumanians are to Romans.</p>
<p><b>The Albanians.</b>—The Albanian people are descended
from the most ancient of all the races in the Balkan
peninsula; their language is the oldest language spoken
in Europe. For centuries they were nominally subject
to Turkey; but the Turks never really succeeded in
conquering them, though many of the Albanians became
Mohammedans.</p>
<p><b>The Greeks.</b>—Though the Greeks are descended in
part from the people who inhabited their country in
ancient times, and though they speak a modern form of
the old Greek language, it is certain that the present
inhabitants are a much mixed race. They are largely
Slav, but hold a strong feeling for the great past of their
country. This gives them an unusually strong national
rallying point. In many ways the Greeks are the most
progressive of the Balkan races.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum">[Pg 63]<SPAN name="Page_63" id="Page_63"></SPAN></span><b>Russia and Austria as Protectors of the Balkan
Countries.</b>—The struggle between the great powers as
to which of them should become the heirs of "the sick
man of Europe," as the Sultan of Turkey was long ago
called, dates back about a century. Austria on account
of her geographical position and her desire to expand
to the southward, and Russia on account of her desire
for Constantinople and the racial ties connecting her
with the Balkan states, each hoped to be preferred.
Both Austria and Russia, then, for more or less selfish
reasons, were anxious to bring about the break-up of the
Turkish Empire in Europe. Whenever a revolt against
Turkish rule would break out, the revolutionists could
almost always count on the help of one or the other of
these nations.</p>
<p>Since the Slavs and the Greeks hated each other, and
both hated the Bulgarians, there was sometimes a
tendency for the Bulgarians and the Greeks to look
to Austria or Germany for help, as a counterpoise to
Russia's influence on behalf of the Slavic states. At
one time, however, Russia gave great aid to Bulgaria.
In all the twists and turns of Balkan politics we find
Russia or Austria posing as protector of the rights of
one or another of the Balkan states.</p>
<p>On the other hand, when all the Balkan states bordering
Turkey put aside their rivalries and combined for
an attack on Turkey in 1912, Germany and Austria
gave what moral support they could to Turkey. Austria
had no desire to see a strong league of the Balkan states
<span class="pagenum">[Pg 64]<SPAN name="Page_64" id="Page_64"></SPAN></span>formed to the south of her, a league which would be
largely under the influence of Russia.</p>
<p>German leaders had already formulated their dream
of <i>Mittel-Europa</i> (Mid-Europe), a broad band of
German-controlled
territory extending to Turkey. With Turkey
itself Germany made treaties which practically assured
her control all the way to Bagdad. Germany had no
desire either for a Balkan league, which would block
her way, or for the defeat of Turkey, which might
interfere with the carrying out of the treaties.</p>
<p><b>The Balkan War of 1912.</b>—Turkish rule in Macedonia
had become increasingly bad. Situated in the
midst of three of the larger Balkan countries, it had
representatives of each among its population. These
countries put aside for the time being their jealousies of
each other. In 1912 Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, and
Montenegro formed an alliance and presented a demand
to Turkey that Macedonia should be made self-governing.
Most of Europe believed that the German-trained
army of the Turks would annihilate the armies of the
smaller nations. But in a little over a month Turkey
was beaten. Even Constantinople might have been
taken had Bulgaria pursued the advantage gained by
her troops. This time no nation protected Turkey, and
the treaty of peace left her with only a tiny bit of
European territory and the city of Constantinople. Incidentally,
Germany had lost much prestige, for Turkey
had fought the war with the help of German officers
and with German encouragement, and had lost.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum">[Pg 65]<SPAN name="Page_65" id="Page_65"></SPAN></span><b>The Second Balkan War.</b>—Unfortunately, the victors
soon quarreled over the spoils. Bulgaria had seized
Thrace and wanted most of Macedonia, including the
city of Saloni´ca, which had been captured by the Greeks.
Austria intervened to prevent Serbia from getting any
increase in territory on the southwest, toward the
Adriatic. Hence Serbia wanted a share of the lands to
the south, claimed by Bulgaria. Bulgaria, backed by
Austria and Germany, refused to make any concessions,
or to leave the dispute to arbitration. She began the
second Balkan war with a night attack on the Serbian
and Greek armies, but was unable to defeat them. On
the contrary Bulgaria was defeated within a month,
partly because Roumania and Turkey also entered the
struggle against her. Bulgaria had to give up much of
her conquests to her former allies. Roumania claimed a
slice off her northeastern corner, and a Turkish army
recaptured Adrianople and neighboring territory from
the hard-pressed Bulgarians.</p>
<p><b>Loss of Prestige by Germany and Austria.</b>—One of
the important results of these two wars was the loss of
prestige by Germany and Austria. These "Central
Powers," as they were called, had gone out of their way
to encourage first Turkey, and then Bulgaria, and both
these countries had been badly beaten. In any future
diplomacy the opinions and desires of the Central
Powers would have less weight and impressiveness than
formerly. To regain their lost influence it was practically
certain that these nations would, at the earliest
<span class="pagenum">[Pg 66]<SPAN name="Page_66" id="Page_66"></SPAN></span>opportunity, make an attempt to impose their will
upon the victorious Balkan states.</p>
<div class="blockquot"><p><b>Suggestions for Study.</b>—1. Locate Macedonia, the Dobrudja,
Nish, Sofia, Durazzo. 2. Define and explain Mittel-Europa;
"The sick man of Europe." 3. Which nations of the Balkan
peninsula border upon the Black Sea? Which border upon the
Adriatic? Which lie along the Danube? 4. On an outline map
of the Balkan peninsula indicate the races to which the populations
belong and their distribution. 5. We have read in this
chapter that the old Roman province of Dacia developed later
into modern Roumania; can you name the Roman provinces
which correspond to the modern nations of France, Spain, England,
Switzerland? 6. What do you know of the history of Constantinople
prior to its capture by the Turks? 7. Explain the
causes of the second Balkan war. How did the outcome of this
war affect the history of the great European powers?</p>
<p><b>References.</b>—<i>War Cyclopedia</i> (C.P.I.); <i>Study of the Great
War</i> (C.P.I.); Davis, <i>The Roots of the War</i>; Hazen, <i>Europe
since 1815</i>; and other general histories of recent Europe.</p>
</div>
<p><span class="pagenum">[Pg 67]<SPAN name="Page_67" id="Page_67"></SPAN></span></p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />