<h3><SPAN name="NEGLECT" id="NEGLECT"></SPAN>NEGLECT.</h3>
<h4>Synonyms:</h4>
<table class="tbs" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>carelessness,</td><td>heedlessness,</td><td>negligence,</td><td>scorn,</td></tr>
<tr><td>default,</td><td>inadvertence,</td><td>omission,</td><td>slackness,</td></tr>
<tr><td>disregard,</td><td>inattention,</td><td>oversight,</td><td>slight,</td></tr>
<tr><td>disrespect,</td><td>indifference,</td><td rowspan="2">remissness,</td><td rowspan="2">thoughtlessness.</td></tr>
<tr><td>failure,</td><td>neglectfulness,</td></tr>
</table>
<p><i>Neglect</i> (L. <i>nec</i>, not, and <i>lego</i>, gather) is the failing to take such
care, show such attention, pay such courtesy, etc., as may be rightfully
or reasonably expected. <i>Negligence</i>, which is the same in
origin, may be used in almost the same sense, but with a slighter
force, as when Whittier speaks of "the <i>negligence</i> which friendship
loves;" but <i>negligence</i> is often used to denote the quality or
trait of character of which the act is a manifestation, or to denote
the habit of neglecting that which ought to be done. <i>Neglect</i> is
transitive, <i>negligence</i> is intransitive; we speak of <i>neglect</i> of his
books, friends, or duties, in which cases we could not use <i>negligence</i>;
<i>negligence</i> in dress implies want of care as to its arrangement,
tidiness, etc.; <i>neglect</i> of one's garments would imply leaving
them exposed to defacement or injury, as by dust, moths, etc.
<i>Neglect</i> has a passive sense which <i>negligence</i> has not; the child
was suffering from <i>neglect</i>, <i>i. e.</i>, from being neglected by others;
the child was suffering from <i>negligence</i> would imply that he himself<span class="pgn"><SPAN name="Page_252" id="Page_252"></SPAN></span>
was neglectful. The distinction sometimes made that <i>neglect</i>
denotes the act, and <i>negligence</i> the habit, is but partially true; one
may be guilty of habitual <i>neglect</i> of duty; the wife may suffer
from her husband's constant <i>neglect</i>, while the <i>negligence</i> which
causes a railroad accident may be that of a moment, and on the
part of one ordinarily careful and attentive; in such cases the law
provides punishment for criminal <i>negligence</i>.</p>
<h4>Antonyms:</h4>
<p>See synonyms for <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#CARE">CARE</SPAN></span>.</p>
<h4>Prepositions:</h4>
<p>Neglect <i>of</i> duty, <i>of</i> the child <i>by</i> the parent; there was neglect
<i>on the part of</i> the teacher.</p>
<hr />
<h3><SPAN name="NEW" id="NEW"></SPAN>NEW.</h3>
<h4>Synonyms:</h4>
<table class="tbs" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>fresh,</td><td>modern,</td><td>new-made,</td><td>upstart,</td></tr>
<tr><td>juvenile,</td><td>new-fangled,</td><td>novel,</td><td>young,</td></tr>
<tr><td>late,</td><td>new-fashioned,</td><td>recent,</td><td>youthful.</td></tr>
</table>
<p>That which is <i>new</i> has lately come into existence, possession,
or use; a <i>new</i> house is just built, or in a more general sense is one
that has just come into the possession of the present owner or
occupant. <i>Modern</i> denotes that which has begun to exist in the
present age, and is still existing; <i>recent</i> denotes that which has
come into existence within a comparatively brief period, and may
or may not be existing still. <i>Modern</i> history pertains to any period
since the middle ages; <i>modern</i> literature, <i>modern</i> architecture,
etc., are not strikingly remote from the styles and types prevalent
to-day. That which is <i>late</i> is somewhat removed from the present,
but not far enough to be called <i>old</i>. That which is <i>recent</i> is
not quite so sharply distinguished from the past as that which
is <i>new</i>; <i>recent</i> publications range over a longer time than
<i>new</i> books. That which is <i>novel</i> is either absolutely or relatively
unprecedented in kind; a <i>novel</i> contrivance is one that has
never before been known; a <i>novel</i> experience is one that has
never before occurred to the same person; that which is <i>new</i> may
be of a familiar or even of an ancient sort, as a <i>new</i> copy of an old
book. <i>Young</i> and <i>youthful</i> are applied to that which has life;
that which is <i>young</i> is possessed of a comparatively <i>new</i> existence
as a living thing, possessing actual youth; that which is <i>youthful</i>
manifests the attributes of youth. (Compare <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#YOUTHFUL">YOUTHFUL</SPAN></span>.)
<i>Fresh</i> applies to that which has the characteristics of newness or
youth, while capable of deterioration by lapse of time; that which<span class="pgn"><SPAN name="Page_253" id="Page_253"></SPAN></span>
is unworn, unspoiled, or unfaded; as, a <i>fresh</i> countenance, <i>fresh</i>
eggs, <i>fresh</i> flowers. <i>New</i> is opposed to <i>old</i>, <i>modern</i> to <i>ancient</i>,
<i>recent</i> to <i>remote</i>, <i>young</i> to <i>old</i>, <i>aged</i>, etc.</p>
<h4>Antonyms:</h4>
<p>See synonyms for <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#OLD">OLD</SPAN></span>.</p>
<hr />
<h3><SPAN name="NIMBLE" id="NIMBLE"></SPAN>NIMBLE.</h3>
<h4>Synonyms:</h4>
<table class="tbs" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>active,</td><td>alert,</td><td>bustling,</td><td>prompt,</td><td>speedy,</td><td>spry,</td></tr>
<tr><td>agile,</td><td>brisk,</td><td>lively,</td><td>quick,</td><td>sprightly,</td><td>swift.</td></tr>
</table>
<p><i>Nimble</i> refers to lightness, freedom, and quickness of motion
within a somewhat narrow range, with readiness to turn suddenly
to any point; <i>swift</i> applies commonly to more sustained motion
over greater distances; a pickpocket is <i>nimble</i>-fingered, a dancer
<i>nimble</i>-footed; an arrow, a race-horse, or an ocean steamer is
<i>swift</i>; Shakespeare's "<i>nimble</i> lightnings" is said of the visual appearance
in sudden zigzag flash across the sky. Figuratively, we
speak of <i>nimble</i> wit, <i>swift</i> intelligence, <i>swift</i> destruction. <i>Alert</i>,
which is strictly a synonym for <i>ready</i>, comes sometimes near the
meaning of <i>nimble</i> or <i>quick</i>, from the fact that the ready, wide-awake
person is likely to be <i>lively</i>, <i>quick</i>, <i>speedy</i>. Compare <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#ACTIVE">ACTIVE</SPAN></span>;
<span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#ALERT">ALERT</SPAN></span>.</p>
<h4>Antonyms:</h4>
<table class="tba" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>clumsy,</td><td>dilatory,</td><td>dull,</td><td>heavy,</td><td>inactive,</td><td>inert,</td><td>slow,</td><td>sluggish,</td><td>unready.</td></tr>
</table>
<hr />
<h3><SPAN name="NORMAL" id="NORMAL"></SPAN>NORMAL.</h3>
<h4>Synonyms:</h4>
<table class="tbs" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>common,</td><td>natural,</td><td>ordinary,</td><td>regular,</td><td>typical,</td><td>usual.</td></tr>
</table>
<p>That which is <i>natural</i> is according to nature; that which is
<i>normal</i> is according to the standard or rule which is observed or
claimed to prevail in nature; a deformity may be <i>natural</i>, symmetry
is <i>normal</i>; the <i>normal</i> color of the crow is black, while the
<i>normal</i> color of the sparrow is gray, but one is as <i>natural</i> as the
other. <i>Typical</i> refers to such an assemblage of qualities as makes
the specimen, genus, etc., a type of some more comprehensive
group, while <i>normal</i> is more commonly applied to the parts of a
single object; the specimen was <i>typical</i>; color, size, and other
characteristics, <i>normal</i>. The <i>regular</i> is etymologically that which
is according to rule, hence that which is steady and constant, as
opposed to that which is fitful and changeable; the <i>normal</i> action
of the heart is <i>regular</i>. That which is <i>common</i> is shared by a<span class="pgn"><SPAN name="Page_254" id="Page_254"></SPAN></span>
great number of persons or things; disease is <i>common</i>, a <i>normal</i>
state of health is rare. Compare <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#GENERAL">GENERAL</SPAN></span>; <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#USUAL">USUAL</SPAN></span>.</p>
<h4>Antonyms:</h4>
<table class="tba" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>abnormal,</td><td>irregular,</td><td>peculiar,</td><td>singular,</td><td>unprecedented,</td></tr>
<tr><td>exceptional,</td><td>monstrous,</td><td>rare,</td><td>uncommon,</td><td>unusual.</td></tr>
</table>
<hr />
<h3><SPAN name="NOTWITHSTANDING_conj" id="NOTWITHSTANDING_conj"></SPAN>NOTWITHSTANDING, <span class="nbi">conj.</span></h3>
<h4>Synonyms:</h4>
<table class="tbs" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>altho(ugh),</td><td>howbeit,</td><td>nevertheless,</td><td>tho(ugh),</td></tr>
<tr><td>but,</td><td>however,</td><td>still,</td><td>yet.</td></tr>
</table>
<p><i>However</i> simply waives discussion, and (like the archaic <i>howbeit</i>)
says "be that as it may, this is true;" <i>nevertheless</i> concedes
the truth of what precedes, but claims that what follows is none
the less true; <i>notwithstanding</i> marshals the two statements face
to face, admits the one and its seeming contradiction to the other,
while insisting that it can not, after all, withstand the other; as,
<i>notwithstanding</i> the force of the enemy is superior, we shall conquer.
<i>Yet</i> and <i>still</i> are weaker than <i>notwithstanding</i>, while
stronger than <i>but</i>. <i>Tho</i> and <i>altho</i> make as little as possible of
the concession, dropping it, as it were, incidentally; as, "<i>tho</i> we
are guilty, thou art good;" to say "we are guilty, <i>but</i> thou art
good," would make the concession of guilt more emphatic.
Compare <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#BUT">BUT</SPAN></span>; <span class="smcl"><SPAN href="#YET">YET</SPAN></span>.</p>
<hr />
<h3>NOTWITHSTANDING, <span class="nbi">prep.</span></h3>
<h4>Synonyms:</h4>
<table class="tbs" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary="">
<tr><td>despite,</td><td>in spite of.</td></tr>
</table>
<p><i>Notwithstanding</i> simply states that circumstances shall not be
or have not been allowed to withstand; <i>despite</i> and <i>in spite of</i> refer
primarily to personal and perhaps spiteful opposition; as, he failed
<i>notwithstanding</i> his good intentions; or, he persevered <i>in spite of</i>
the most bitter hostility. When <i>despite</i> and <i>in spite of</i> are applied
to inanimate things, it is with something of personification; "<i>in
spite of</i> the storm" is said as if the storm had a hostile purpose to
oppose the undertaking.</p>
<hr />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />