<p>But a rich man's son can never know that. He takes his bride into a finer
mansion, it may be, but he is obliged to go all the way through it and say
to his wife, "My mother gave me that, my mother gave me that, and my
mother gave me this," until his wife wishes she had married his mother. I
pity the rich man's son.</p>
<p>The statistics of Massachusetts showed that not one rich man's son out of
seventeen ever dies rich. I pity the rich man's sons unless they have the
good sense of the elder Vanderbilt, which sometimes happens. He went to
his father and said, "Did you earn all your money?" "I did, my son. I
began to work on a ferry-boat for twenty-five cents a day." "Then," said
his son, "I will have none of your money," and he, too, tried to get
employment on a ferry-boat that Saturday night. He could not get one
there, but he did get a place for three dollars a week. Of course, if a
rich man's son will do that, he will get the discipline of a poor boy that
is worth more than a university education to any man. He would then be
able to take care of the millions of his father. But as a rule the rich
men will not let their sons do the very thing that made them great. As a
rule, the rich man will not allow his son to work—and his mother!
Why, she would think it was a social disgrace if her poor, weak, little
lily-fingered, sissy sort of a boy had to earn his living with honest
toil. I have no pity for such rich men's sons.</p>
<p>I remember one at Niagara Falls. I think I remember one a great deal
nearer. I think there are gentlemen present who were at a great banquet,
and I beg pardon of his friends. At a banquet here in Philadelphia there
sat beside me a kind-hearted young man, and he said, "Mr. Conwell, you
have been sick for two or three years. When you go out, take my limousine,
and it will take you up to your house on Broad Street." I thanked him very
much, and perhaps I ought not to mention the incident in this way, but I
follow the facts. I got on to the seat with the driver of that limousine,
outside, and when we were going up I asked the driver, "How much did this
limousine cost?" "Six thousand eight hundred, and he had to pay the duty
on it." "Well," I said, "does the owner of this machine ever drive it
himself?" At that the chauffeur laughed so heartily that he lost control
of his machine. He was so surprised at the question that he ran up on the
sidewalk, and around a corner lamp-post out into the street again. And
when he got out into the street he laughed till the whole machine
trembled. He said: "He drive this machine! Oh, he would be lucky if he
knew enough to get out when we get there."</p>
<p>I must tell you about a rich man's son at Niagara Falls. I came in from
the lecture to the hotel, and as I approached the desk of the clerk there
stood a millionaire's son from New York. He was an indescribable specimen
of anthropologic potency. He had a skull-cap on one side of his head, with
a gold tassel in the top of it, and a gold-headed cane under his arm with
more in it than in his head. It is a very difficult thing to describe that
young man. He wore an eye-glass that he could not see through,
patent-leather boots that he could not walk in, and pants that he could
not sit down in—dressed like a grasshopper. This human cricket came
up to the clerk's desk just as I entered, adjusted his unseeing eye-glass,
and spake in this wise to the clerk. You see, he thought it was "Hinglish,
you know," to lisp. "Thir, will you have the kindness to supply me with
thome papah and enwelophs!" The hotel clerk measured that man quick, and
he pulled the envelopes and paper out of a drawer, threw them across the
counter toward the young man, and then turned away to his books. You
should have seen that young man when those envelopes came across that
counter. He swelled up like a gobbler turkey, adjusted his unseeing
eye-glass, and yelled: "Come right back here. Now thir, will you order a
thervant to take that papah and enwelophs to yondah dethk." Oh, the poor,
miserable, contemptible American monkey! He could not carry paper and
envelopes twenty feet. I suppose he could not get his arms down to do it.
I have no pity for such travesties upon human nature. If you have not
capital, young man, I am glad of it. What you need is common sense, not
copper cents.</p>
<p>The best thing I can do is to illustrate by actual facts well-known to you
all. A. T. Stewart, a poor boy in New York, had $1.50 to begin life on. He
lost 87 1/2 cents of that on the very first venture. How fortunate that
young man who loses the first time he gambles. That boy said, "I will
never gamble again in business," and he never did. How came he to lose 87
1/2 cents? You probably all know the story how he lost it—because he
bought some needles, threads, and buttons to sell which people did not
want, and had them left on his hands, a dead loss. Said the boy, "I will
not lose any more money in that way." Then he went around first to the
doors and asked the people what they did want. Then when he had found out
what they wanted he invested his 62 1/2 cents to supply a known demand.
Study it wherever you choose—in business, in your profession, in
your housekeeping, whatever your life, that one thing is the secret of
success. You must first know the demand. You must first know what people
need, and then invest yourself where you are most needed. A. T. Stewart
went on that principle until he was worth what amounted afterward to forty
millions of dollars, owning the very store in which Mr. Wanamaker carries
on his great work in New York. His fortune was made by his losing
something, which taught him the great lesson that he must only invest
himself or his money in something that people need. When will you salesmen
learn it? When will you manufacturers learn that you must know the
changing needs of humanity if you would succeed in life? Apply yourselves,
all you Christian people, as manufacturers or merchants or workmen to
supply that human need. It is a great principle as broad as humanity and
as deep as the Scripture itself.</p>
<p>The best illustration I ever heard was of John Jacob Astor. You know that
he made the money of the Astor family when he lived in New York. He came
across the sea in debt for his fare. But that poor boy with nothing in his
pocket made the fortune of the Astor family on one principle. Some young
man here to-night will say, "Well they could make those fortunes over in
New York but they could not do it in Philadelphia!" My friends, did you
ever read that wonderful book of Riis (his memory is sweet to us because
of his recent death), wherein is given his statistical account of the
records taken in 1889 of 107 millionaires of New York. If you read the
account you will see that out of the 107 millionaires only seven made
their money in New York. Out of the 107 millionaires worth ten million
dollars in real estate then, 67 of them made their money in towns of less
than 3,500 inhabitants. The richest man in this country to-day, if you
read the real-estate values, has never moved away from a town of 3,500
inhabitants. It makes not so much difference where you are as who you are.
But if you cannot get rich in Philadelphia you certainly cannot do it in
New York.</p>
<p>Now John Jacob Astor illustrated what can be done anywhere. He had a
mortgage once on a millinery-store, and they could not sell bonnets enough
to pay the interest on his money. So he foreclosed that mortgage, took
possession of the store, and went into partnership with the very same
people, in the same store, with the same capital. He did not give them a
dollar of capital. They had to sell goods to get any money. Then he left
them alone in the store just as they had been before, and he went out and
sat down on a bench in the park in the shade. What was John Jacob Astor
doing out there, and in partnership with people who had failed on his own
hands? He had the most important and, to my mind, the most pleasant part
of that partnership on his hands. For as John Jacob Astor sat on that
bench he was watching the ladies as they went by; and where is the man who
would not get rich at that business? As he sat on the bench if a lady
passed him with her shoulders back and head up, and looked straight to the
front, as if she did not care if all the world did gaze on her, then he
studied her bonnet, and by the time it was out of sight he knew the shape
of the frame, the color of the trimmings, and the crinklings in the
feather. I sometimes try to describe a bonnet, but not always. I would not
try to describe a modern bonnet. Where is the man that could describe one?
This aggregation of all sorts of driftwood stuck on the back of the head,
or the side of the neck, like a rooster with only one tail feather left.
But in John Jacob Astor's day there was some art about the millinery
business, and he went to the millinery-store and said to them: "Now put
into the show-window just such a bonnet as I describe to you, because I
have already seen a lady who likes such a bonnet. Don't make up any more
until I come back." Then he went out and sat down again, and another lady
passed him of a different form, of different complexion, with a different
shape and color of bonnet. "Now," said he, "put such a bonnet as that in
the show window." He did not fill his show-window up town with a lot of
hats and bonnets to drive people away, and then sit on the back stairs and
bawl because people went to Wanamaker's to trade. He did not have a hat or
a bonnet in that show-window but what some lady liked before it was made
up. The tide of custom began immediately to turn in, and that has been the
foundation of the greatest store in New York in that line, and still
exists as one of three stores. Its fortune was made by John Jacob Astor
after they had failed in business, not by giving them any more money, but
by finding out what the ladies liked for bonnets before they wasted any
material in making them up. I tell you if a man could foresee the
millinery business he could foresee anything under heaven!</p>
<p>Suppose I were to go through this audience to-night and ask you in this
great manufacturing city if there are not opportunities to get rich in
manufacturing. "Oh yes," some young man says, "there are opportunities
here still if you build with some trust and if you have two or three
millions of dollars to begin with as capital." Young man, the history of
the breaking up of the trusts by that attack upon "big business" is only
illustrating what is now the opportunity of the smaller man. The time
never came in the history of the world when you could get rich so quickly
manufacturing without capital as you can now.</p>
<p>But you will say, "You cannot do anything of the kind. You cannot start
without capital." Young man, let me illustrate for a moment. I must do it.
It is my duty to every young man and woman, because we are all going into
business very soon on the same plan. Young man, remember if you know what
people need you have gotten more knowledge of a fortune than any amount of
capital can give you.</p>
<p>There was a poor man out of work living in Hingham, Massachusetts. He
lounged around the house until one day his wife told him to get out and
work, and, as he lived in Massachusetts, he obeyed his wife. He went out
and sat down on the shore of the bay, and whittled a soaked shingle into a
wooden chain. His children that evening quarreled over it, and he whittled
a second one to keep peace. While he was whittling the second one a
neighbor came in and said: "Why don't you whittle toys and sell them? You
could make money at that." "Oh," he said, "I would not know what to make."
"Why don't you ask your own children right here in your own house what to
make?" "What is the use of trying that?" said the carpenter. "My children
are different from other people's children." (I used to see people like
that when I taught school.) But he acted upon the hint, and the next
morning when Mary came down the stairway, he asked, "What do you want for
a toy?" She began to tell him she would like a doll's bed, a doll's
washstand, a doll's carriage, a little doll's umbrella, and went on with a
list of things that would take him a lifetime to supply. So, consulting
his own children, in his own house, he took the firewood, for he had no
money to buy lumber, and whittled those strong, unpainted Hingham toys
that were for so many years known all over the world. That man began to
make those toys for his own children, and then made copies and sold them
through the boot-and-shoe store next door. He began to make a little
money, and then a little more, and Mr. Lawson, in his <i>Frenzied Finance</i>
says that man is the richest man in old Massachusetts, and I think it is
the truth. And that man is worth a hundred millions of dollars to-day, and
has been only thirty-four years making it on that one principle—that
one must judge that what his own children like at home other people's
children would like in their homes, too; to judge the human heart by
oneself, by one's wife or by one's children. It is the royal road to
success in manufacturing. "Oh," but you say, "didn't he have any capital?"
Yes, a penknife, but I don't know that he had paid for that.</p>
<p>I spoke thus to an audience in New Britain, Connecticut, and a lady four
seats back went home and tried to take off her collar, and the
collar-button stuck in the buttonhole. She threw it out and said, "I am
going to get up something better than that to put on collars." Her husband
said: "After what Conwell said to-night, you see there is a need of an
improved collar-fastener that is easier to handle. There is a human need;
there is a great fortune. Now, then, get up a collar-button and get rich."
He made fun of her, and consequently made fun of me, and that is one of
the saddest things which comes over me like a deep cloud of midnight
sometimes—although I have worked so hard for more than half a
century, yet how little I have ever really done. Notwithstanding the
greatness and the handsomeness of your compliment to-night, I do not
believe there is one in ten of you that is going to make a million of
dollars because you are here to-night; but it is not my fault, it is
yours. I say that sincerely. What is the use of my talking if people never
do what I advise them to do? When her husband ridiculed her, she made up
her mind she would make a better collar-button, and when a woman makes up
her mind "she will," and does not say anything about it, she does it. It
was that New England woman who invented the snap button which you can find
anywhere now. It was first a collar-button with a spring cap attached to
the outer side. Any of you who wear modern waterproofs know the button
that simply pushes together, and when you unbutton it you simply pull it
apart. That is the button to which I refer, and which she invented. She
afterward invented several other buttons, and then invested in more, and
then was taken into partnership with great factories. Now that woman goes
over the sea every summer in her private steamship—yes, and takes
her husband with her! If her husband were to die, she would have money
enough left now to buy a foreign duke or count or some such title as that
at the latest quotations.</p>
<p>Now what is my lesson in that incident? It is this: I told her then,
though I did not know her, what I now say to you, "Your wealth is too near
to you. You are looking right over it"; and she had to look over it
because it was right under her chin.</p>
<p>I have read in the newspaper that a woman never invented anything. Well,
that newspaper ought to begin again. Of course, I do not refer to gossip—I
refer to machines—and if I did I might better include the men. That
newspaper could never appear if women had not invented something. Friends,
think. Ye women, think! You say you cannot make a fortune because you are
in some laundry, or running a sewing-machine, it may be, or walking before
some loom, and yet you can be a millionaire if you will but follow this
almost infallible direction.</p>
<p>When you say a woman doesn't invent anything, I ask, Who invented the
Jacquard loom that wove every stitch you wear? Mrs. Jacquard. The
printer's roller, the printing-press, were invented by farmers' wives. Who
invented the cotton-gin of the South that enriched our country so
amazingly? Mrs. General Greene invented the cotton-gin and showed the idea
to Mr. Whitney, and he, like a man, seized it. Who was it that invented
the sewing-machine? If I would go to school to-morrow and ask your
children they would say, "Elias Howe."</p>
<p>He was in the Civil War with me, and often in my tent, and I often heard
him say that he worked fourteen years to get up that sewing-machine. But
his wife made up her mind one day that they would starve to death if there
wasn't something or other invented pretty soon, and so in two hours she
invented the sewing-machine. Of course he took out the patent in his name.
Men always do that. Who was it that invented the mower and the reaper?
According to Mr. McCormick's confidential communication, so recently
published, it was a West Virginia woman, who, after his father and he had
failed altogether in making a reaper and gave it up, took a lot of shears
and nailed them together on the edge of a board, with one shaft of each
pair loose, and then wired them so that when she pulled the wire one way
it closed them, and when she pulled the wire the other way it opened them,
and there she had the principle of the mowing-machine. If you look at a
mowing-machine, you will see it is nothing but a lot of shears. If a woman
can invent a mowing-machine, if a woman can invent a Jacquard loom, if a
woman can invent a cotton-gin, if a woman can invent a trolley switch—as
she did and made the trolleys possible; if a woman can invent, as Mr.
Carnegie said, the great iron squeezers that laid the foundation of all
the steel millions of the United States, "we men" can invent anything
under the stars! I say that for the encouragement of the men.</p>
<p>Who are the great inventors of the world? Again this lesson comes before
us. The great inventor sits next to you, or you are the person yourself.
"Oh," but you will say, "I have never invented anything in my life."
Neither did the great inventors until they discovered one great secret. Do
you think it is a man with a head like a bushel measure or a man like a
stroke of lightning? It is neither. The really great man is a plain,
straightforward, every-day, common-sense man. You would not dream that he
was a great inventor if you did not see something he had actually done.
His neighbors do not regard him so great. You never see anything great
over your back fence. You say there is no greatness among your neighbors.
It is all away off somewhere else. Their greatness is ever so simple, so
plain, so earnest, so practical, that the neighbors and friends never
recognize it.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />