<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0003" id="link2HCH0003"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER III </h2>
<h3> <i>Congress of the Peloponnesian Confederacy at Lacedaemon</i> </h3>
<p>The Athenians and Peloponnesians had these antecedent grounds of complaint
against each other: the complaint of Corinth was that her colony of
Potidaea, and Corinthian and Peloponnesian citizens within it, were being
besieged; that of Athens against the Peloponnesians that they had incited
a town of hers, a member of her alliance and a contributor to her revenue,
to revolt, and had come and were openly fighting against her on the side
of the Potidaeans. For all this, war had not yet broken out: there was
still truce for a while; for this was a private enterprise on the part of
Corinth.</p>
<p>But the siege of Potidaea put an end to her inaction; she had men inside
it: besides, she feared for the place. Immediately summoning the allies to
Lacedaemon, she came and loudly accused Athens of breach of the treaty and
aggression on the rights of Peloponnese. With her, the Aeginetans,
formally unrepresented from fear of Athens, in secret proved not the least
urgent of the advocates for war, asserting that they had not the
independence guaranteed to them by the treaty. After extending the summons
to any of their allies and others who might have complaints to make of
Athenian aggression, the Lacedaemonians held their ordinary assembly, and
invited them to speak. There were many who came forward and made their
several accusations; among them the Megarians, in a long list of
grievances, called special attention to the fact of their exclusion from
the ports of the Athenian empire and the market of Athens, in defiance of
the treaty. Last of all the Corinthians came forward, and having let those
who preceded them inflame the Lacedaemonians, now followed with a speech
to this effect:</p>
<p>"Lacedaemonians! the confidence which you feel in your constitution and
social order, inclines you to receive any reflections of ours on other
powers with a certain scepticism. Hence springs your moderation, but hence
also the rather limited knowledge which you betray in dealing with foreign
politics. Time after time was our voice raised to warn you of the blows
about to be dealt us by Athens, and time after time, instead of taking the
trouble to ascertain the worth of our communications, you contented
yourselves with suspecting the speakers of being inspired by private
interest. And so, instead of calling these allies together before the blow
fell, you have delayed to do so till we are smarting under it; allies
among whom we have not the worst title to speak, as having the greatest
complaints to make, complaints of Athenian outrage and Lacedaemonian
neglect. Now if these assaults on the rights of Hellas had been made in
the dark, you might be unacquainted with the facts, and it would be our
duty to enlighten you. As it is, long speeches are not needed where you
see servitude accomplished for some of us, meditated for others—in
particular for our allies—and prolonged preparations in the
aggressor against the hour of war. Or what, pray, is the meaning of their
reception of Corcyra by fraud, and their holding it against us by force?
what of the siege of Potidaea?—places one of which lies most
conveniently for any action against the Thracian towns; while the other
would have contributed a very large navy to the Peloponnesians?</p>
<p>"For all this you are responsible. You it was who first allowed them to
fortify their city after the Median war, and afterwards to erect the long
walls—you who, then and now, are always depriving of freedom not
only those whom they have enslaved, but also those who have as yet been
your allies. For the true author of the subjugation of a people is not so
much the immediate agent, as the power which permits it having the means
to prevent it; particularly if that power aspires to the glory of being
the liberator of Hellas. We are at last assembled. It has not been easy to
assemble, nor even now are our objects defined. We ought not to be still
inquiring into the fact of our wrongs, but into the means of our defence.
For the aggressors with matured plans to oppose to our indecision have
cast threats aside and betaken themselves to action. And we know what are
the paths by which Athenian aggression travels, and how insidious is its
progress. A degree of confidence she may feel from the idea that your
bluntness of perception prevents your noticing her; but it is nothing to
the impulse which her advance will receive from the knowledge that you
see, but do not care to interfere. You, Lacedaemonians, of all the
Hellenes are alone inactive, and defend yourselves not by doing anything
but by looking as if you would do something; you alone wait till the power
of an enemy is becoming twice its original size, instead of crushing it in
its infancy. And yet the world used to say that you were to be depended
upon; but in your case, we fear, it said more than the truth. The Mede, we
ourselves know, had time to come from the ends of the earth to
Peloponnese, without any force of yours worthy of the name advancing to
meet him. But this was a distant enemy. Well, Athens at all events is a
near neighbour, and yet Athens you utterly disregard; against Athens you
prefer to act on the defensive instead of on the offensive, and to make it
an affair of chances by deferring the struggle till she has grown far
stronger than at first. And yet you know that on the whole the rock on
which the barbarian was wrecked was himself, and that if our present enemy
Athens has not again and again annihilated us, we owe it more to her
blunders than to your protection; Indeed, expectations from you have
before now been the ruin of some, whose faith induced them to omit
preparation.</p>
<p>"We hope that none of you will consider these words of remonstrance to be
rather words of hostility; men remonstrate with friends who are in error,
accusations they reserve for enemies who have wronged them. Besides, we
consider that we have as good a right as any one to point out a
neighbour's faults, particularly when we contemplate the great contrast
between the two national characters; a contrast of which, as far as we can
see, you have little perception, having never yet considered what sort of
antagonists you will encounter in the Athenians, how widely, how
absolutely different from yourselves. The Athenians are addicted to
innovation, and their designs are characterized by swiftness alike in
conception and execution; you have a genius for keeping what you have got,
accompanied by a total want of invention, and when forced to act you never
go far enough. Again, they are adventurous beyond their power, and daring
beyond their judgment, and in danger they are sanguine; your wont is to
attempt less than is justified by your power, to mistrust even what is
sanctioned by your judgment, and to fancy that from danger there is no
release. Further, there is promptitude on their side against
procrastination on yours; they are never at home, you are never from it:
for they hope by their absence to extend their acquisitions, you fear by
your advance to endanger what you have left behind. They are swift to
follow up a success, and slow to recoil from a reverse. Their bodies they
spend ungrudgingly in their country's cause; their intellect they
jealously husband to be employed in her service. A scheme unexecuted is
with them a positive loss, a successful enterprise a comparative failure.
The deficiency created by the miscarriage of an undertaking is soon filled
up by fresh hopes; for they alone are enabled to call a thing hoped for a
thing got, by the speed with which they act upon their resolutions. Thus
they toil on in trouble and danger all the days of their life, with little
opportunity for enjoying, being ever engaged in getting: their only idea
of a holiday is to do what the occasion demands, and to them laborious
occupation is less of a misfortune than the peace of a quiet life. To
describe their character in a word, one might truly say that they were
born into the world to take no rest themselves and to give none to others.</p>
<p>"Such is Athens, your antagonist. And yet, Lacedaemonians, you still
delay, and fail to see that peace stays longest with those, who are not
more careful to use their power justly than to show their determination
not to submit to injustice. On the contrary, your ideal of fair dealing is
based on the principle that, if you do not injure others, you need not
risk your own fortunes in preventing others from injuring you. Now you
could scarcely have succeeded in such a policy even with a neighbour like
yourselves; but in the present instance, as we have just shown, your
habits are old-fashioned as compared with theirs. It is the law as in art,
so in politics, that improvements ever prevail; and though fixed usages
may be best for undisturbed communities, constant necessities of action
must be accompanied by the constant improvement of methods. Thus it
happens that the vast experience of Athens has carried her further than
you on the path of innovation.</p>
<p>"Here, at least, let your procrastination end. For the present, assist
your allies and Potidaea in particular, as you promised, by a speedy
invasion of Attica, and do not sacrifice friends and kindred to their
bitterest enemies, and drive the rest of us in despair to some other
alliance. Such a step would not be condemned either by the Gods who
received our oaths, or by the men who witnessed them. The breach of a
treaty cannot be laid to the people whom desertion compels to seek new
relations, but to the power that fails to assist its confederate. But if
you will only act, we will stand by you; it would be unnatural for us to
change, and never should we meet with such a congenial ally. For these
reasons choose the right course, and endeavour not to let Peloponnese
under your supremacy degenerate from the prestige that it enjoyed under
that of your ancestors."</p>
<p>Such were the words of the Corinthians. There happened to be Athenian
envoys present at Lacedaemon on other business. On hearing the speeches
they thought themselves called upon to come before the Lacedaemonians.
Their intention was not to offer a defence on any of the charges which the
cities brought against them, but to show on a comprehensive view that it
was not a matter to be hastily decided on, but one that demanded further
consideration. There was also a wish to call attention to the great power
of Athens, and to refresh the memory of the old and enlighten the
ignorance of the young, from a notion that their words might have the
effect of inducing them to prefer tranquillity to war. So they came to the
Lacedaemonians and said that they too, if there was no objection, wished
to speak to their assembly. They replied by inviting them to come forward.
The Athenians advanced, and spoke as follows:</p>
<p>"The object of our mission here was not to argue with your allies, but to
attend to the matters on which our state dispatched us. However, the
vehemence of the outcry that we hear against us has prevailed on us to
come forward. It is not to combat the accusations of the cities (indeed
you are not the judges before whom either we or they can plead), but to
prevent your taking the wrong course on matters of great importance by
yielding too readily to the persuasions of your allies. We also wish to
show on a review of the whole indictment that we have a fair title to our
possessions, and that our country has claims to consideration. We need not
refer to remote antiquity: there we could appeal to the voice of
tradition, but not to the experience of our audience. But to the Median
War and contemporary history we must refer, although we are rather tired
of continually bringing this subject forward. In our action during that
war we ran great risk to obtain certain advantages: you had your share in
the solid results, do not try to rob us of all share in the good that the
glory may do us. However, the story shall be told not so much to deprecate
hostility as to testify against it, and to show, if you are so ill advised
as to enter into a struggle with Athens, what sort of an antagonist she is
likely to prove. We assert that at Marathon we were at the front, and
faced the barbarian single-handed. That when he came the second time,
unable to cope with him by land we went on board our ships with all our
people, and joined in the action at Salamis. This prevented his taking the
Peloponnesian states in detail, and ravaging them with his fleet; when the
multitude of his vessels would have made any combination for self-defence
impossible. The best proof of this was furnished by the invader himself.
Defeated at sea, he considered his power to be no longer what it had been,
and retired as speedily as possible with the greater part of his army.</p>
<p>"Such, then, was the result of the matter, and it was clearly proved that
it was on the fleet of Hellas that her cause depended. Well, to this
result we contributed three very useful elements, viz., the largest number
of ships, the ablest commander, and the most unhesitating patriotism. Our
contingent of ships was little less than two-thirds of the whole four
hundred; the commander was Themistocles, through whom chiefly it was that
the battle took place in the straits, the acknowledged salvation of our
cause. Indeed, this was the reason of your receiving him with honours such
as had never been accorded to any foreign visitor. While for daring
patriotism we had no competitors. Receiving no reinforcements from behind,
seeing everything in front of us already subjugated, we had the spirit,
after abandoning our city, after sacrificing our property (instead of
deserting the remainder of the league or depriving them of our services by
dispersing), to throw ourselves into our ships and meet the danger,
without a thought of resenting your neglect to assist us. We assert,
therefore, that we conferred on you quite as much as we received. For you
had a stake to fight for; the cities which you had left were still filled
with your homes, and you had the prospect of enjoying them again; and your
coming was prompted quite as much by fear for yourselves as for us; at all
events, you never appeared till we had nothing left to lose. But we left
behind us a city that was a city no longer, and staked our lives for a
city that had an existence only in desperate hope, and so bore our full
share in your deliverance and in ours. But if we had copied others, and
allowed fears for our territory to make us give in our adhesion to the
Mede before you came, or if we had suffered our ruin to break our spirit
and prevent us embarking in our ships, your naval inferiority would have
made a sea-fight unnecessary, and his objects would have been peaceably
attained.</p>
<p>"Surely, Lacedaemonians, neither by the patriotism that we displayed at
that crisis, nor by the wisdom of our counsels, do we merit our extreme
unpopularity with the Hellenes, not at least unpopularity for our empire.
That empire we acquired by no violent means, but because you were
unwilling to prosecute to its conclusion the war against the barbarian,
and because the allies attached themselves to us and spontaneously asked
us to assume the command. And the nature of the case first compelled us to
advance our empire to its present height; fear being our principal motive,
though honour and interest afterwards came in. And at last, when almost
all hated us, when some had already revolted and had been subdued, when
you had ceased to be the friends that you once were, and had become
objects of suspicion and dislike, it appeared no longer safe to give up
our empire; especially as all who left us would fall to you. And no one
can quarrel with a people for making, in matters of tremendous risk, the
best provision that it can for its interest.</p>
<p>"You, at all events, Lacedaemonians, have used your supremacy to settle
the states in Peloponnese as is agreeable to you. And if at the period of
which we were speaking you had persevered to the end of the matter, and
had incurred hatred in your command, we are sure that you would have made
yourselves just as galling to the allies, and would have been forced to
choose between a strong government and danger to yourselves. It follows
that it was not a very wonderful action, or contrary to the common
practice of mankind, if we did accept an empire that was offered to us,
and refused to give it up under the pressure of three of the strongest
motives, fear, honour, and interest. And it was not we who set the
example, for it has always been law that the weaker should be subject to
the stronger. Besides, we believed ourselves to be worthy of our position,
and so you thought us till now, when calculations of interest have made
you take up the cry of justice—a consideration which no one ever yet
brought forward to hinder his ambition when he had a chance of gaining
anything by might. And praise is due to all who, if not so superior to
human nature as to refuse dominion, yet respect justice more than their
position compels them to do.</p>
<p>"We imagine that our moderation would be best demonstrated by the conduct
of others who should be placed in our position; but even our equity has
very unreasonably subjected us to condemnation instead of approval. Our
abatement of our rights in the contract trials with our allies, and our
causing them to be decided by impartial laws at Athens, have gained us the
character of being litigious. And none care to inquire why this reproach
is not brought against other imperial powers, who treat their subjects
with less moderation than we do; the secret being that where force can be
used, law is not needed. But our subjects are so habituated to associate
with us as equals that any defeat whatever that clashes with their notions
of justice, whether it proceeds from a legal judgment or from the power
which our empire gives us, makes them forget to be grateful for being
allowed to retain most of their possessions, and more vexed at a part
being taken, than if we had from the first cast law aside and openly
gratified our covetousness. If we had done so, not even would they have
disputed that the weaker must give way to the stronger. Men's indignation,
it seems, is more excited by legal wrong than by violent wrong; the first
looks like being cheated by an equal, the second like being compelled by a
superior. At all events they contrived to put up with much worse treatment
than this from the Mede, yet they think our rule severe, and this is to be
expected, for the present always weighs heavy on the conquered. This at
least is certain. If you were to succeed in overthrowing us and in taking
our place, you would speedily lose the popularity with which fear of us
has invested you, if your policy of to-day is at all to tally with the
sample that you gave of it during the brief period of your command against
the Mede. Not only is your life at home regulated by rules and
institutions incompatible with those of others, but your citizens abroad
act neither on these rules nor on those which are recognized by the rest
of Hellas.</p>
<p>"Take time then in forming your resolution, as the matter is of great
importance; and do not be persuaded by the opinions and complaints of
others to bring trouble on yourselves, but consider the vast influence of
accident in war, before you are engaged in it. As it continues, it
generally becomes an affair of chances, chances from which neither of us
is exempt, and whose event we must risk in the dark. It is a common
mistake in going to war to begin at the wrong end, to act first, and wait
for disaster to discuss the matter. But we are not yet by any means so
misguided, nor, so far as we can see, are you; accordingly, while it is
still open to us both to choose aright, we bid you not to dissolve the
treaty, or to break your oaths, but to have our differences settled by
arbitration according to our agreement. Or else we take the gods who heard
the oaths to witness, and if you begin hostilities, whatever line of
action you choose, we will try not to be behindhand in repelling you."</p>
<p>Such were the words of the Athenians. After the Lacedaemonians had heard
the complaints of the allies against the Athenians, and the observations
of the latter, they made all withdraw, and consulted by themselves on the
question before them. The opinions of the majority all led to the same
conclusion; the Athenians were open aggressors, and war must be declared
at once. But Archidamus, the Lacedaemonian king, came forward, who had the
reputation of being at once a wise and a moderate man, and made the
following speech:</p>
<p>"I have not lived so long, Lacedaemonians, without having had the
experience of many wars, and I see those among you of the same age as
myself, who will not fall into the common misfortune of longing for war
from inexperience or from a belief in its advantage and its safety. This,
the war on which you are now debating, would be one of the greatest
magnitude, on a sober consideration of the matter. In a struggle with
Peloponnesians and neighbours our strength is of the same character, and
it is possible to move swiftly on the different points. But a struggle
with a people who live in a distant land, who have also an extraordinary
familiarity with the sea, and who are in the highest state of preparation
in every other department; with wealth private and public, with ships, and
horses, and heavy infantry, and a population such as no one other Hellenic
place can equal, and lastly a number of tributary allies—what can
justify us in rashly beginning such a struggle? wherein is our trust that
we should rush on it unprepared? Is it in our ships? There we are
inferior; while if we are to practise and become a match for them, time
must intervene. Is it in our money? There we have a far greater
deficiency. We neither have it in our treasury, nor are we ready to
contribute it from our private funds. Confidence might possibly be felt in
our superiority in heavy infantry and population, which will enable us to
invade and devastate their lands. But the Athenians have plenty of other
land in their empire, and can import what they want by sea. Again, if we
are to attempt an insurrection of their allies, these will have to be
supported with a fleet, most of them being islanders. What then is to be
our war? For unless we can either beat them at sea, or deprive them of the
revenues which feed their navy, we shall meet with little but disaster.
Meanwhile our honour will be pledged to keeping on, particularly if it be
the opinion that we began the quarrel. For let us never be elated by the
fatal hope of the war being quickly ended by the devastation of their
lands. I fear rather that we may leave it as a legacy to our children; so
improbable is it that the Athenian spirit will be the slave of their land,
or Athenian experience be cowed by war.</p>
<p>"Not that I would bid you be so unfeeling as to suffer them to injure your
allies, and to refrain from unmasking their intrigues; but I do bid you
not to take up arms at once, but to send and remonstrate with them in a
tone not too suggestive of war, nor again too suggestive of submission,
and to employ the interval in perfecting our own preparations. The means
will be, first, the acquisition of allies, Hellenic or barbarian it
matters not, so long as they are an accession to our strength naval or
pecuniary—I say Hellenic or barbarian, because the odium of such an
accession to all who like us are the objects of the designs of the
Athenians is taken away by the law of self-preservation—and secondly
the development of our home resources. If they listen to our embassy, so
much the better; but if not, after the lapse of two or three years our
position will have become materially strengthened, and we can then attack
them if we think proper. Perhaps by that time the sight of our
preparations, backed by language equally significant, will have disposed
them to submission, while their land is still untouched, and while their
counsels may be directed to the retention of advantages as yet
undestroyed. For the only light in which you can view their land is that
of a hostage in your hands, a hostage the more valuable the better it is
cultivated. This you ought to spare as long as possible, and not make them
desperate, and so increase the difficulty of dealing with them. For if
while still unprepared, hurried away by the complaints of our allies, we
are induced to lay it waste, have a care that we do not bring deep
disgrace and deep perplexity upon Peloponnese. Complaints, whether of
communities or individuals, it is possible to adjust; but war undertaken
by a coalition for sectional interests, whose progress there is no means
of foreseeing, does not easily admit of creditable settlement.</p>
<p>"And none need think it cowardice for a number of confederates to pause
before they attack a single city. The Athenians have allies as numerous as
our own, and allies that pay tribute, and war is a matter not so much of
arms as of money, which makes arms of use. And this is more than ever true
in a struggle between a continental and a maritime power. First, then, let
us provide money, and not allow ourselves to be carried away by the talk
of our allies before we have done so: as we shall have the largest share
of responsibility for the consequences be they good or bad, we have also a
right to a tranquil inquiry respecting them.</p>
<p>"And the slowness and procrastination, the parts of our character that are
most assailed by their criticism, need not make you blush. If we undertake
the war without preparation, we should by hastening its commencement only
delay its conclusion: further, a free and a famous city has through all
time been ours. The quality which they condemn is really nothing but a
wise moderation; thanks to its possession, we alone do not become insolent
in success and give way less than others in misfortune; we are not carried
away by the pleasure of hearing ourselves cheered on to risks which our
judgment condemns; nor, if annoyed, are we any the more convinced by
attempts to exasperate us by accusation. We are both warlike and wise, and
it is our sense of order that makes us so. We are warlike, because
self-control contains honour as a chief constituent, and honour bravery.
And we are wise, because we are educated with too little learning to
despise the laws, and with too severe a self-control to disobey them, and
are brought up not to be too knowing in useless matters—such as the
knowledge which can give a specious criticism of an enemy's plans in
theory, but fails to assail them with equal success in practice—but
are taught to consider that the schemes of our enemies are not dissimilar
to our own, and that the freaks of chance are not determinable by
calculation. In practice we always base our preparations against an enemy
on the assumption that his plans are good; indeed, it is right to rest our
hopes not on a belief in his blunders, but on the soundness of our
provisions. Nor ought we to believe that there is much difference between
man and man, but to think that the superiority lies with him who is reared
in the severest school. These practices, then, which our ancestors have
delivered to us, and by whose maintenance we have always profited, must
not be given up. And we must not be hurried into deciding in a day's brief
space a question which concerns many lives and fortunes and many cities,
and in which honour is deeply involved—but we must decide calmly.
This our strength peculiarly enables us to do. As for the Athenians, send
to them on the matter of Potidaea, send on the matter of the alleged
wrongs of the allies, particularly as they are prepared with legal
satisfaction; and to proceed against one who offers arbitration as against
a wrongdoer, law forbids. Meanwhile do not omit preparation for war. This
decision will be the best for yourselves, the most terrible to your
opponents."</p>
<p>Such were the words of Archidamus. Last came forward Sthenelaidas, one of
the ephors for that year, and spoke to the Lacedaemonians as follows:</p>
<p>"The long speech of the Athenians I do not pretend to understand. They
said a good deal in praise of themselves, but nowhere denied that they are
injuring our allies and Peloponnese. And yet if they behaved well against
the Mede then, but ill towards us now, they deserve double punishment for
having ceased to be good and for having become bad. We meanwhile are the
same then and now, and shall not, if we are wise, disregard the wrongs of
our allies, or put off till to-morrow the duty of assisting those who must
suffer to-day. Others have much money and ships and horses, but we have
good allies whom we must not give up to the Athenians, nor by lawsuits and
words decide the matter, as it is anything but in word that we are harmed,
but render instant and powerful help. And let us not be told that it is
fitting for us to deliberate under injustice; long deliberation is rather
fitting for those who have injustice in contemplation. Vote therefore,
Lacedaemonians, for war, as the honour of Sparta demands, and neither
allow the further aggrandizement of Athens, nor betray our allies to ruin,
but with the gods let us advance against the aggressors."</p>
<p>With these words he, as ephor, himself put the question to the assembly of
the Lacedaemonians. He said that he could not determine which was the
loudest acclamation (their mode of decision is by acclamation not by
voting); the fact being that he wished to make them declare their opinion
openly and thus to increase their ardour for war. Accordingly he said:
"All Lacedaemonians who are of opinion that the treaty has been broken,
and that Athens is guilty, leave your seats and go there," pointing out a
certain place; "all who are of the opposite opinion, there." They
accordingly stood up and divided; and those who held that the treaty had
been broken were in a decided majority. Summoning the allies, they told
them that their opinion was that Athens had been guilty of injustice, but
that they wished to convoke all the allies and put it to the vote; in
order that they might make war, if they decided to do so, on a common
resolution. Having thus gained their point, the delegates returned home at
once; the Athenian envoys a little later, when they had dispatched the
objects of their mission. This decision of the assembly, judging that the
treaty had been broken, was made in the fourteenth year of the thirty
years' truce, which was entered into after the affair of Euboea.</p>
<p>The Lacedaemonians voted that the treaty had been broken, and that the war
must be declared, not so much because they were persuaded by the arguments
of the allies, as because they feared the growth of the power of the
Athenians, seeing most of Hellas already subject to them.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />