<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0005" id="link2HCH0005"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER V </h2>
<p><i>Second Congress at Lacedaemon—Preparations for War and Diplomatic
Skirmishes—Cylon—Pausanias—Themistocles</i></p>
<p>After this, though not many years later, we at length come to what has
been already related, the affairs of Corcyra and Potidaea, and the events
that served as a pretext for the present war. All these actions of the
Hellenes against each other and the barbarian occurred in the fifty years'
interval between the retreat of Xerxes and the beginning of the present
war. During this interval the Athenians succeeded in placing their empire
on a firmer basis, and advanced their own home power to a very great
height. The Lacedaemonians, though fully aware of it, opposed it only for
a little while, but remained inactive during most of the period, being of
old slow to go to war except under the pressure of necessity, and in the
present instance being hampered by wars at home; until the growth of the
Athenian power could be no longer ignored, and their own confederacy
became the object of its encroachments. They then felt that they could
endure it no longer, but that the time had come for them to throw
themselves heart and soul upon the hostile power, and break it, if they
could, by commencing the present war. And though the Lacedaemonians had
made up their own minds on the fact of the breach of the treaty and the
guilt of the Athenians, yet they sent to Delphi and inquired of the God
whether it would be well with them if they went to war; and, as it is
reported, received from him the answer that if they put their whole
strength into the war, victory would be theirs, and the promise that he
himself would be with them, whether invoked or uninvoked. Still they
wished to summon their allies again, and to take their vote on the
propriety of making war. After the ambassadors from the confederates had
arrived and a congress had been convened, they all spoke their minds, most
of them denouncing the Athenians and demanding that the war should begin.
In particular the Corinthians. They had before on their own account
canvassed the cities in detail to induce them to vote for the war, in the
fear that it might come too late to save Potidaea; they were present also
on this occasion, and came forward the last, and made the following
speech:</p>
<p>"Fellow allies, we can no longer accuse the Lacedaemonians of having
failed in their duty: they have not only voted for war themselves, but
have assembled us here for that purpose. We say their duty, for supremacy
has its duties. Besides equitably administering private interests, leaders
are required to show a special care for the common welfare in return for
the special honours accorded to them by all in other ways. For ourselves,
all who have already had dealings with the Athenians require no warning to
be on their guard against them. The states more inland and out of the
highway of communication should understand that, if they omit to support
the coast powers, the result will be to injure the transit of their
produce for exportation and the reception in exchange of their imports
from the sea; and they must not be careless judges of what is now said, as
if it had nothing to do with them, but must expect that the sacrifice of
the powers on the coast will one day be followed by the extension of the
danger to the interior, and must recognize that their own interests are
deeply involved in this discussion. For these reasons they should not
hesitate to exchange peace for war. If wise men remain quiet, while they
are not injured, brave men abandon peace for war when they are injured,
returning to an understanding on a favourable opportunity: in fact, they
are neither intoxicated by their success in war, nor disposed to take an
injury for the sake of the delightful tranquillity of peace. Indeed, to
falter for the sake of such delights is, if you remain inactive, the
quickest way of losing the sweets of repose to which you cling; while to
conceive extravagant pretensions from success in war is to forget how
hollow is the confidence by which you are elated. For if many
ill-conceived plans have succeeded through the still greater fatuity of an
opponent, many more, apparently well laid, have on the contrary ended in
disgrace. The confidence with which we form our schemes is never
completely justified in their execution; speculation is carried on in
safety, but, when it comes to action, fear causes failure.</p>
<p>"To apply these rules to ourselves, if we are now kindling war it is under
the pressure of injury, with adequate grounds of complaint; and after we
have chastised the Athenians we will in season desist. We have many
reasons to expect success—first, superiority in numbers and in
military experience, and secondly our general and unvarying obedience in
the execution of orders. The naval strength which they possess shall be
raised by us from our respective antecedent resources, and from the moneys
at Olympia and Delphi. A loan from these enables us to seduce their
foreign sailors by the offer of higher pay. For the power of Athens is
more mercenary than national; while ours will not be exposed to the same
risk, as its strength lies more in men than in money. A single defeat at
sea is in all likelihood their ruin: should they hold out, in that case
there will be the more time for us to exercise ourselves in naval matters;
and as soon as we have arrived at an equality in science, we need scarcely
ask whether we shall be their superiors in courage. For the advantages
that we have by nature they cannot acquire by education; while their
superiority in science must be removed by our practice. The money required
for these objects shall be provided by our contributions: nothing indeed
could be more monstrous than the suggestion that, while their allies never
tire of contributing for their own servitude, we should refuse to spend
for vengeance and self-preservation the treasure which by such refusal we
shall forfeit to Athenian rapacity and see employed for our own ruin.</p>
<p>"We have also other ways of carrying on the war, such as revolt of their
allies, the surest method of depriving them of their revenues, which are
the source of their strength, and establishment of fortified positions in
their country, and various operations which cannot be foreseen at present.
For war of all things proceeds least upon definite rules, but draws
principally upon itself for contrivances to meet an emergency; and in such
cases the party who faces the struggle and keeps his temper best meets
with most security, and he who loses his temper about it with
correspondent disaster. Let us also reflect that if it was merely a number
of disputes of territory between rival neighbours, it might be borne; but
here we have an enemy in Athens that is a match for our whole coalition,
and more than a match for any of its members; so that unless as a body and
as individual nationalities and individual cities we make an unanimous
stand against her, she will easily conquer us divided and in detail. That
conquest, terrible as it may sound, would, it must be known, have no other
end than slavery pure and simple; a word which Peloponnese cannot even
hear whispered without disgrace, or without disgrace see so many states
abused by one. Meanwhile the opinion would be either that we were justly
so used, or that we put up with it from cowardice, and were proving
degenerate sons in not even securing for ourselves the freedom which our
fathers gave to Hellas; and in allowing the establishment in Hellas of a
tyrant state, though in individual states we think it our duty to put down
sole rulers. And we do not know how this conduct can be held free from
three of the gravest failings, want of sense, of courage, or of vigilance.
For we do not suppose that you have taken refuge in that contempt of an
enemy which has proved so fatal in so many instances—a feeling which
from the numbers that it has ruined has come to be called not contemptuous
but contemptible.</p>
<p>"There is, however, no advantage in reflections on the past further than
may be of service to the present. For the future we must provide by
maintaining what the present gives us and redoubling our efforts; it is
hereditary to us to win virtue as the fruit of labour, and you must not
change the habit, even though you should have a slight advantage in wealth
and resources; for it is not right that what was won in want should be
lost in plenty; no, we must boldly advance to the war for many reasons;
the god has commanded it and promised to be with us, and the rest of
Hellas will all join in the struggle, part from fear, part from interest.
You will be the first to break a treaty which the god, in advising us to
go to war, judges to be violated already, but rather to support a treaty
that has been outraged: indeed, treaties are broken not by resistance but
by aggression.</p>
<p>"Your position, therefore, from whatever quarter you may view it, will
amply justify you in going to war; and this step we recommend in the
interests of all, bearing in mind that identity of interest is the surest
of bonds, whether between states or individuals. Delay not, therefore, to
assist Potidaea, a Dorian city besieged by Ionians, which is quite a
reversal of the order of things; nor to assert the freedom of the rest. It
is impossible for us to wait any longer when waiting can only mean
immediate disaster for some of us, and, if it comes to be known that we
have conferred but do not venture to protect ourselves, like disaster in
the near future for the rest. Delay not, fellow allies, but, convinced of
the necessity of the crisis and the wisdom of this counsel, vote for the
war, undeterred by its immediate terrors, but looking beyond to the
lasting peace by which it will be succeeded. Out of war peace gains fresh
stability, but to refuse to abandon repose for war is not so sure a method
of avoiding danger. We must believe that the tyrant city that has been
established in Hellas has been established against all alike, with a
programme of universal empire, part fulfilled, part in contemplation; let
us then attack and reduce it, and win future security for ourselves and
freedom for the Hellenes who are now enslaved."</p>
<p>Such were the words of the Corinthians. The Lacedaemonians, having now
heard all, give their opinion, took the vote of all the allied states
present in order, great and small alike; and the majority voted for war.
This decided, it was still impossible for them to commence at once, from
their want of preparation; but it was resolved that the means requisite
were to be procured by the different states, and that there was to be no
delay. And indeed, in spite of the time occupied with the necessary
arrangements, less than a year elapsed before Attica was invaded, and the
war openly begun.</p>
<p>This interval was spent in sending embassies to Athens charged with
complaints, in order to obtain as good a pretext for war as possible, in
the event of her paying no attention to them. The first Lacedaemonian
embassy was to order the Athenians to drive out the curse of the goddess;
the history of which is as follows. In former generations there was an
Athenian of the name of Cylon, a victor at the Olympic games, of good
birth and powerful position, who had married a daughter of Theagenes, a
Megarian, at that time tyrant of Megara. Now this Cylon was inquiring at
Delphi; when he was told by the god to seize the Acropolis of Athens on
the grand festival of Zeus. Accordingly, procuring a force from Theagenes
and persuading his friends to join him, when the Olympic festival in
Peloponnese came, he seized the Acropolis, with the intention of making
himself tyrant, thinking that this was the grand festival of Zeus, and
also an occasion appropriate for a victor at the Olympic games. Whether
the grand festival that was meant was in Attica or elsewhere was a
question which he never thought of, and which the oracle did not offer to
solve. For the Athenians also have a festival which is called the grand
festival of Zeus Meilichios or Gracious, viz., the Diasia. It is
celebrated outside the city, and the whole people sacrifice not real
victims but a number of bloodless offerings peculiar to the country.
However, fancying he had chosen the right time, he made the attempt. As
soon as the Athenians perceived it, they flocked in, one and all, from the
country, and sat down, and laid siege to the citadel. But as time went on,
weary of the labour of blockade, most of them departed; the responsibility
of keeping guard being left to the nine archons, with plenary powers to
arrange everything according to their good judgment. It must be known that
at that time most political functions were discharged by the nine archons.
Meanwhile Cylon and his besieged companions were distressed for want of
food and water. Accordingly Cylon and his brother made their escape; but
the rest being hard pressed, and some even dying of famine, seated
themselves as suppliants at the altar in the Acropolis. The Athenians who
were charged with the duty of keeping guard, when they saw them at the
point of death in the temple, raised them up on the understanding that no
harm should be done to them, led them out, and slew them. Some who as they
passed by took refuge at the altars of the awful goddesses were dispatched
on the spot. From this deed the men who killed them were called accursed
and guilty against the goddess, they and their descendants. Accordingly
these cursed ones were driven out by the Athenians, driven out again by
Cleomenes of Lacedaemon and an Athenian faction; the living were driven
out, and the bones of the dead were taken up; thus they were cast out. For
all that, they came back afterwards, and their descendants are still in
the city.</p>
<p>This, then was the curse that the Lacedaemonians ordered them to drive
out. They were actuated primarily, as they pretended, by a care for the
honour of the gods; but they also know that Pericles, son of Xanthippus,
was connected with the curse on his mother's side, and they thought that
his banishment would materially advance their designs on Athens. Not that
they really hoped to succeed in procuring this; they rather thought to
create a prejudice against him in the eyes of his countrymen from the
feeling that the war would be partly caused by his misfortune. For being
the most powerful man of his time, and the leading Athenian statesman, he
opposed the Lacedaemonians in everything, and would have no concessions,
but ever urged the Athenians on to war.</p>
<p>The Athenians retorted by ordering the Lacedaemonians to drive out the
curse of Taenarus. The Lacedaemonians had once raised up some Helot
suppliants from the temple of Poseidon at Taenarus, led them away and
slain them; for which they believe the great earthquake at Sparta to have
been a retribution. The Athenians also ordered them to drive out the curse
of the goddess of the Brazen House; the history of which is as follows.
After Pausanias the Lacedaemonian had been recalled by the Spartans from
his command in the Hellespont (this is his first recall), and had been
tried by them and acquitted, not being again sent out in a public
capacity, he took a galley of Hermione on his own responsibility, without
the authority of the Lacedaemonians, and arrived as a private person in
the Hellespont. He came ostensibly for the Hellenic war, really to carry
on his intrigues with the King, which he had begun before his recall,
being ambitious of reigning over Hellas. The circumstance which first
enabled him to lay the King under an obligation, and to make a beginning
of the whole design, was this. Some connections and kinsmen of the King
had been taken in Byzantium, on its capture from the Medes, when he was
first there, after the return from Cyprus. These captives he sent off to
the King without the knowledge of the rest of the allies, the account
being that they had escaped from him. He managed this with the help of
Gongylus, an Eretrian, whom he had placed in charge of Byzantium and the
prisoners. He also gave Gongylus a letter for the King, the contents of
which were as follows, as was afterwards discovered: "Pausanias, the
general of Sparta, anxious to do you a favour, sends you these his
prisoners of war. I propose also, with your approval, to marry your
daughter, and to make Sparta and the rest of Hellas subject to you. I may
say that I think I am able to do this, with your co-operation. Accordingly
if any of this please you, send a safe man to the sea through whom we may
in future conduct our correspondence."</p>
<p>This was all that was revealed in the writing, and Xerxes was pleased with
the letter. He sent off Artabazus, son of Pharnaces, to the sea with
orders to supersede Megabates, the previous governor in the satrapy of
Daskylion, and to send over as quickly as possible to Pausanias at
Byzantium a letter which he entrusted to him; to show him the royal
signet, and to execute any commission which he might receive from
Pausanias on the King's matters with all care and fidelity. Artabazus on
his arrival carried the King's orders into effect, and sent over the
letter, which contained the following answer: "Thus saith King Xerxes to
Pausanias. For the men whom you have saved for me across sea from
Byzantium, an obligation is laid up for you in our house, recorded for
ever; and with your proposals I am well pleased. Let neither night nor day
stop you from diligently performing any of your promises to me; neither
for cost of gold nor of silver let them be hindered, nor yet for number of
troops, wherever it may be that their presence is needed; but with
Artabazus, an honourable man whom I send you, boldly advance my objects
and yours, as may be most for the honour and interest of us both."</p>
<p>Before held in high honour by the Hellenes as the hero of Plataea,
Pausanias, after the receipt of this letter, became prouder than ever, and
could no longer live in the usual style, but went out of Byzantium in a
Median dress, was attended on his march through Thrace by a bodyguard of
Medes and Egyptians, kept a Persian table, and was quite unable to contain
his intentions, but betrayed by his conduct in trifles what his ambition
looked one day to enact on a grander scale. He also made himself difficult
of access, and displayed so violent a temper to every one without
exception that no one could come near him. Indeed, this was the principal
reason why the confederacy went over to the Athenians.</p>
<p>The above-mentioned conduct, coming to the ears of the Lacedaemonians,
occasioned his first recall. And after his second voyage out in the ship
of Hermione, without their orders, he gave proofs of similar behaviour.
Besieged and expelled from Byzantium by the Athenians, he did not return
to Sparta; but news came that he had settled at Colonae in the Troad, and
was intriguing with the barbarians, and that his stay there was for no
good purpose; and the ephors, now no longer hesitating, sent him a herald
and a scytale with orders to accompany the herald or be declared a public
enemy. Anxious above everything to avoid suspicion, and confident that he
could quash the charge by means of money, he returned a second time to
Sparta. At first thrown into prison by the ephors (whose powers enable
them to do this to the King), soon compromised the matter and came out
again, and offered himself for trial to any who wished to institute an
inquiry concerning him.</p>
<p>Now the Spartans had no tangible proof against him—neither his
enemies nor the nation—of that indubitable kind required for the
punishment of a member of the royal family, and at that moment in high
office; he being regent for his first cousin King Pleistarchus, Leonidas's
son, who was still a minor. But by his contempt of the laws and imitation
of the barbarians, he gave grounds for much suspicion of his being
discontented with things established; all the occasions on which he had in
any way departed from the regular customs were passed in review, and it
was remembered that he had taken upon himself to have inscribed on the
tripod at Delphi, which was dedicated by the Hellenes as the first-fruits
of the spoil of the Medes, the following couplet:</p>
<p>The Mede defeated, great Pausanias raised<br/>
This monument, that Phoebus might be praised.<br/></p>
<p>At the time the Lacedaemonians had at once erased the couplet, and
inscribed the names of the cities that had aided in the overthrow of the
barbarian and dedicated the offering. Yet it was considered that Pausanias
had here been guilty of a grave offence, which, interpreted by the light
of the attitude which he had since assumed, gained a new significance, and
seemed to be quite in keeping with his present schemes. Besides, they were
informed that he was even intriguing with the Helots; and such indeed was
the fact, for he promised them freedom and citizenship if they would join
him in insurrection and would help him to carry out his plans to the end.
Even now, mistrusting the evidence even of the Helots themselves, the
ephors would not consent to take any decided step against him; in
accordance with their regular custom towards themselves, namely, to be
slow in taking any irrevocable resolve in the matter of a Spartan citizen
without indisputable proof. At last, it is said, the person who was going
to carry to Artabazus the last letter for the King, a man of Argilus, once
the favourite and most trusty servant of Pausanias, turned informer.
Alarmed by the reflection that none of the previous messengers had ever
returned, having counterfeited the seal, in order that, if he found
himself mistaken in his surmises, or if Pausanias should ask to make some
correction, he might not be discovered, he undid the letter, and found the
postscript that he had suspected, viz. an order to put him to death.</p>
<p>On being shown the letter, the ephors now felt more certain. Still, they
wished to hear Pausanias commit himself with their own ears. Accordingly
the man went by appointment to Taenarus as a suppliant, and there built
himself a hut divided into two by a partition; within which he concealed
some of the ephors and let them hear the whole matter plainly. For
Pausanias came to him and asked him the reason of his suppliant position;
and the man reproached him with the order that he had written concerning
him, and one by one declared all the rest of the circumstances, how he who
had never yet brought him into any danger, while employed as agent between
him and the King, was yet just like the mass of his servants to be
rewarded with death. Admitting all this, and telling him not to be angry
about the matter, Pausanias gave him the pledge of raising him up from the
temple, and begged him to set off as quickly as possible, and not to
hinder the business in hand.</p>
<p>The ephors listened carefully, and then departed, taking no action for the
moment, but, having at last attained to certainty, were preparing to
arrest him in the city. It is reported that, as he was about to be
arrested in the street, he saw from the face of one of the ephors what he
was coming for; another, too, made him a secret signal, and betrayed it to
him from kindness. Setting off with a run for the temple of the goddess of
the Brazen House, the enclosure of which was near at hand, he succeeded in
taking sanctuary before they took him, and entering into a small chamber,
which formed part of the temple, to avoid being exposed to the weather,
lay still there. The ephors, for the moment distanced in the pursuit,
afterwards took off the roof of the chamber, and having made sure that he
was inside, shut him in, barricaded the doors, and staying before the
place, reduced him by starvation. When they found that he was on the point
of expiring, just as he was, in the chamber, they brought him out of the
temple, while the breath was still in him, and as soon as he was brought
out he died. They were going to throw him into the Kaiadas, where they
cast criminals, but finally decided to inter him somewhere near. But the
god at Delphi afterwards ordered the Lacedaemonians to remove the tomb to
the place of his death—where he now lies in the consecrated ground,
as an inscription on a monument declares—and, as what had been done
was a curse to them, to give back two bodies instead of one to the goddess
of the Brazen House. So they had two brazen statues made, and dedicated
them as a substitute for Pausanias. The Athenians retorted by telling the
Lacedaemonians to drive out what the god himself had pronounced to be a
curse.</p>
<p>To return to the Medism of Pausanias. Matter was found in the course of
the inquiry to implicate Themistocles; and the Lacedaemonians accordingly
sent envoys to the Athenians and required them to punish him as they had
punished Pausanias. The Athenians consented to do so. But he had, as it
happened, been ostracized, and, with a residence at Argos, was in the
habit of visiting other parts of Peloponnese. So they sent with the
Lacedaemonians, who were ready to join in the pursuit, persons with
instructions to take him wherever they found him. But Themistocles got
scent of their intentions, and fled from Peloponnese to Corcyra, which was
under obligations towards him. But the Corcyraeans alleged that they could
not venture to shelter him at the cost of offending Athens and Lacedaemon,
and they conveyed him over to the continent opposite. Pursued by the
officers who hung on the report of his movements, at a loss where to turn,
he was compelled to stop at the house of Admetus, the Molossian king,
though they were not on friendly terms. Admetus happened not to be
indoors, but his wife, to whom he made himself a suppliant, instructed him
to take their child in his arms and sit down by the hearth. Soon
afterwards Admetus came in, and Themistocles told him who he was, and
begged him not to revenge on Themistocles in exile any opposition which
his requests might have experienced from Themistocles at Athens. Indeed,
he was now far too low for his revenge; retaliation was only honourable
between equals. Besides, his opposition to the king had only affected the
success of a request, not the safety of his person; if the king were to
give him up to the pursuers that he mentioned, and the fate which they
intended for him, he would just be consigning him to certain death.</p>
<p>The King listened to him and raised him up with his son, as he was sitting
with him in his arms after the most effectual method of supplication, and
on the arrival of the Lacedaemonians not long afterwards, refused to give
him up for anything they could say, but sent him off by land to the other
sea to Pydna in Alexander's dominions, as he wished to go to the Persian
king. There he met with a merchantman on the point of starting for Ionia.
Going on board, he was carried by a storm to the Athenian squadron which
was blockading Naxos. In his alarm—he was luckily unknown to the
people in the vessel—he told the master who he was and what he was
flying for, and said that, if he refused to save him, he would declare
that he was taking him for a bribe. Meanwhile their safety consisted in
letting no one leave the ship until a favourable time for sailing should
arise. If he complied with his wishes, he promised him a proper
recompense. The master acted as he desired, and, after lying to for a day
and a night out of reach of the squadron, at length arrived at Ephesus.</p>
<p>After having rewarded him with a present of money, as soon as he received
some from his friends at Athens and from his secret hoards at Argos,
Themistocles started inland with one of the coast Persians, and sent a
letter to King Artaxerxes, Xerxes's son, who had just come to the throne.
Its contents were as follows: "I, Themistocles, am come to you, who did
your house more harm than any of the Hellenes, when I was compelled to
defend myself against your father's invasion—harm, however, far
surpassed by the good that I did him during his retreat, which brought no
danger for me but much for him. For the past, you are a good turn in my
debt"—here he mentioned the warning sent to Xerxes from Salamis to
retreat, as well as his finding the bridges unbroken, which, as he falsely
pretended, was due to him—"for the present, able to do you great
service, I am here, pursued by the Hellenes for my friendship for you.
However, I desire a year's grace, when I shall be able to declare in
person the objects of my coming."</p>
<p>It is said that the King approved his intention, and told him to do as he
said. He employed the interval in making what progress he could in the
study of the Persian tongue, and of the customs of the country. Arrived at
court at the end of the year, he attained to very high consideration
there, such as no Hellene has ever possessed before or since; partly from
his splendid antecedents, partly from the hopes which he held out of
effecting for him the subjugation of Hellas, but principally by the proof
which experience daily gave of his capacity. For Themistocles was a man
who exhibited the most indubitable signs of genius; indeed, in this
particular he has a claim on our admiration quite extraordinary and
unparalleled. By his own native capacity, alike unformed and
unsupplemented by study, he was at once the best judge in those sudden
crises which admit of little or of no deliberation, and the best prophet
of the future, even to its most distant possibilities. An able theoretical
expositor of all that came within the sphere of his practice, he was not
without the power of passing an adequate judgment in matters in which he
had no experience. He could also excellently divine the good and evil
which lay hid in the unseen future. In fine, whether we consider the
extent of his natural powers, or the slightness of his application, this
extraordinary man must be allowed to have surpassed all others in the
faculty of intuitively meeting an emergency. Disease was the real cause of
his death; though there is a story of his having ended his life by poison,
on finding himself unable to fulfil his promises to the king. However this
may be, there is a monument to him in the marketplace of Asiatic Magnesia.
He was governor of the district, the King having given him Magnesia, which
brought in fifty talents a year, for bread, Lampsacus, which was
considered to be the richest wine country, for wine, and Myos for other
provisions. His bones, it is said, were conveyed home by his relatives in
accordance with his wishes, and interred in Attic ground. This was done
without the knowledge of the Athenians; as it is against the law to bury
in Attica an outlaw for treason. So ends the history of Pausanias and
Themistocles, the Lacedaemonian and the Athenian, the most famous men of
their time in Hellas.</p>
<p>To return to the Lacedaemonians. The history of their first embassy, the
injunctions which it conveyed, and the rejoinder which it provoked,
concerning the expulsion of the accursed persons, have been related
already. It was followed by a second, which ordered Athens to raise the
siege of Potidaea, and to respect the independence of Aegina. Above all,
it gave her most distinctly to understand that war might be prevented by
the revocation of the Megara decree, excluding the Megarians from the use
of Athenian harbours and of the market of Athens. But Athens was not
inclined either to revoke the decree, or to entertain their other
proposals; she accused the Megarians of pushing their cultivation into the
consecrated ground and the unenclosed land on the border, and of
harbouring her runaway slaves. At last an embassy arrived with the
Lacedaemonian ultimatum. The ambassadors were Ramphias, Melesippus, and
Agesander. Not a word was said on any of the old subjects; there was
simply this: "Lacedaemon wishes the peace to continue, and there is no
reason why it should not, if you would leave the Hellenes independent."
Upon this the Athenians held an assembly, and laid the matter before their
consideration. It was resolved to deliberate once for all on all their
demands, and to give them an answer. There were many speakers who came
forward and gave their support to one side or the other, urging the
necessity of war, or the revocation of the decree and the folly of
allowing it to stand in the way of peace. Among them came forward
Pericles, son of Xanthippus, the first man of his time at Athens, ablest
alike in counsel and in action, and gave the following advice:</p>
<p>"There is one principle, Athenians, which I hold to through everything,
and that is the principle of no concession to the Peloponnesians. I know
that the spirit which inspires men while they are being persuaded to make
war is not always retained in action; that as circumstances change,
resolutions change. Yet I see that now as before the same, almost
literally the same, counsel is demanded of me; and I put it to those of
you who are allowing yourselves to be persuaded, to support the national
resolves even in the case of reverses, or to forfeit all credit for their
wisdom in the event of success. For sometimes the course of things is as
arbitrary as the plans of man; indeed this is why we usually blame chance
for whatever does not happen as we expected. Now it was clear before that
Lacedaemon entertained designs against us; it is still more clear now. The
treaty provides that we shall mutually submit our differences to legal
settlement, and that we shall meanwhile each keep what we have. Yet the
Lacedaemonians never yet made us any such offer, never yet would accept
from us any such offer; on the contrary, they wish complaints to be
settled by war instead of by negotiation; and in the end we find them here
dropping the tone of expostulation and adopting that of command. They
order us to raise the siege of Potidaea, to let Aegina be independent, to
revoke the Megara decree; and they conclude with an ultimatum warning us
to leave the Hellenes independent. I hope that you will none of you think
that we shall be going to war for a trifle if we refuse to revoke the
Megara decree, which appears in front of their complaints, and the
revocation of which is to save us from war, or let any feeling of
self-reproach linger in your minds, as if you went to war for slight
cause. Why, this trifle contains the whole seal and trial of your
resolution. If you give way, you will instantly have to meet some greater
demand, as having been frightened into obedience in the first instance;
while a firm refusal will make them clearly understand that they must
treat you more as equals. Make your decision therefore at once, either to
submit before you are harmed, or if we are to go to war, as I for one
think we ought, to do so without caring whether the ostensible cause be
great or small, resolved against making concessions or consenting to a
precarious tenure of our possessions. For all claims from an equal, urged
upon a neighbour as commands before any attempt at legal settlement, be
they great or be they small, have only one meaning, and that is slavery.</p>
<p>"As to the war and the resources of either party, a detailed comparison
will not show you the inferiority of Athens. Personally engaged in the
cultivation of their land, without funds either private or public, the
Peloponnesians are also without experience in long wars across sea, from
the strict limit which poverty imposes on their attacks upon each other.
Powers of this description are quite incapable of often manning a fleet or
often sending out an army: they cannot afford the absence from their
homes, the expenditure from their own funds; and besides, they have not
command of the sea. Capital, it must be remembered, maintains a war more
than forced contributions. Farmers are a class of men that are always more
ready to serve in person than in purse. Confident that the former will
survive the dangers, they are by no means so sure that the latter will not
be prematurely exhausted, especially if the war last longer than they
expect, which it very likely will. In a single battle the Peloponnesians
and their allies may be able to defy all Hellas, but they are
incapacitated from carrying on a war against a power different in
character from their own, by the want of the single council-chamber
requisite to prompt and vigorous action, and the substitution of a diet
composed of various races, in which every state possesses an equal vote,
and each presses its own ends, a condition of things which generally
results in no action at all. The great wish of some is to avenge
themselves on some particular enemy, the great wish of others to save
their own pocket. Slow in assembling, they devote a very small fraction of
the time to the consideration of any public object, most of it to the
prosecution of their own objects. Meanwhile each fancies that no harm will
come of his neglect, that it is the business of somebody else to look
after this or that for him; and so, by the same notion being entertained
by all separately, the common cause imperceptibly decays.</p>
<p>"But the principal point is the hindrance that they will experience from
want of money. The slowness with which it comes in will cause delay; but
the opportunities of war wait for no man. Again, we need not be alarmed
either at the possibility of their raising fortifications in Attica, or at
their navy. It would be difficult for any system of fortifications to
establish a rival city, even in time of peace, much more, surely, in an
enemy's country, with Athens just as much fortified against it as it
against Athens; while a mere post might be able to do some harm to the
country by incursions and by the facilities which it would afford for
desertion, but can never prevent our sailing into their country and
raising fortifications there, and making reprisals with our powerful
fleet. For our naval skill is of more use to us for service on land, than
their military skill for service at sea. Familiarity with the sea they
will not find an easy acquisition. If you who have been practising at it
ever since the Median invasion have not yet brought it to perfection, is
there any chance of anything considerable being effected by an
agricultural, unseafaring population, who will besides be prevented from
practising by the constant presence of strong squadrons of observation
from Athens? With a small squadron they might hazard an engagement,
encouraging their ignorance by numbers; but the restraint of a strong
force will prevent their moving, and through want of practice they will
grow more clumsy, and consequently more timid. It must be kept in mind
that seamanship, just like anything else, is a matter of art, and will not
admit of being taken up occasionally as an occupation for times of
leisure; on the contrary, it is so exacting as to leave leisure for
nothing else.</p>
<p>"Even if they were to touch the moneys at Olympia or Delphi, and try to
seduce our foreign sailors by the temptation of higher pay, that would
only be a serious danger if we could not still be a match for them by
embarking our own citizens and the aliens resident among us. But in fact
by this means we are always a match for them; and, best of all, we have a
larger and higher class of native coxswains and sailors among our own
citizens than all the rest of Hellas. And to say nothing of the danger of
such a step, none of our foreign sailors would consent to become an outlaw
from his country, and to take service with them and their hopes, for the
sake of a few days' high pay.</p>
<p>"This, I think, is a tolerably fair account of the position of the
Peloponnesians; that of Athens is free from the defects that I have
criticized in them, and has other advantages of its own, which they can
show nothing to equal. If they march against our country we will sail
against theirs, and it will then be found that the desolation of the whole
of Attica is not the same as that of even a fraction of Peloponnese; for
they will not be able to supply the deficiency except by a battle, while
we have plenty of land both on the islands and the continent. The rule of
the sea is indeed a great matter. Consider for a moment. Suppose that we
were islanders; can you conceive a more impregnable position? Well, this
in future should, as far as possible, be our conception of our position.
Dismissing all thought of our land and houses, we must vigilantly guard
the sea and the city. No irritation that we may feel for the former must
provoke us to a battle with the numerical superiority of the
Peloponnesians. A victory would only be succeeded by another battle
against the same superiority: a reverse involves the loss of our allies,
the source of our strength, who will not remain quiet a day after we
become unable to march against them. We must cry not over the loss of
houses and land but of men's lives; since houses and land do not gain men,
but men them. And if I had thought that I could persuade you, I would have
bid you go out and lay them waste with your own hands, and show the
Peloponnesians that this at any rate will not make you submit.</p>
<p>"I have many other reasons to hope for a favourable issue, if you can
consent not to combine schemes of fresh conquest with the conduct of the
war, and will abstain from wilfully involving yourselves in other dangers;
indeed, I am more afraid of our own blunders than of the enemy's devices.
But these matters shall be explained in another speech, as events require;
for the present dismiss these men with the answer that we will allow
Megara the use of our market and harbours, when the Lacedaemonians suspend
their alien acts in favour of us and our allies, there being nothing in
the treaty to prevent either one or the other: that we will leave the
cities independent, if independent we found them when we made the treaty,
and when the Lacedaemonians grant to their cities an independence not
involving subservience to Lacedaemonian interests, but such as each
severally may desire: that we are willing to give the legal satisfaction
which our agreements specify, and that we shall not commence hostilities,
but shall resist those who do commence them. This is an answer agreeable
at once to the rights and the dignity of Athens. It must be thoroughly
understood that war is a necessity; but that the more readily we accept
it, the less will be the ardour of our opponents, and that out of the
greatest dangers communities and individuals acquire the greatest glory.
Did not our fathers resist the Medes not only with resources far different
from ours, but even when those resources had been abandoned; and more by
wisdom than by fortune, more by daring than by strength, did not they beat
off the barbarian and advance their affairs to their present height? We
must not fall behind them, but must resist our enemies in any way and in
every way, and attempt to hand down our power to our posterity
unimpaired."</p>
<p>Such were the words of Pericles. The Athenians, persuaded of the wisdom of
his advice, voted as he desired, and answered the Lacedaemonians as he
recommended, both on the separate points and in the general; they would do
nothing on dictation, but were ready to have the complaints settled in a
fair and impartial manner by the legal method, which the terms of the
truce prescribed. So the envoys departed home and did not return again.</p>
<p>These were the charges and differences existing between the rival powers
before the war, arising immediately from the affair at Epidamnus and
Corcyra. Still intercourse continued in spite of them, and mutual
communication. It was carried on without heralds, but not without
suspicion, as events were occurring which were equivalent to a breach of
the treaty and matter for war.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />