<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0007" id="link2HCH0007"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER VII </h2>
<p><i>Second Year of the War—The Plague of Athens—Position and
Policy of Pericles—Fall of Potidaea</i></p>
<p>Such was the funeral that took place during this winter, with which the
first year of the war came to an end. In the first days of summer the
Lacedaemonians and their allies, with two-thirds of their forces as
before, invaded Attica, under the command of Archidamus, son of
Zeuxidamus, King of Lacedaemon, and sat down and laid waste the country.
Not many days after their arrival in Attica the plague first began to show
itself among the Athenians. It was said that it had broken out in many
places previously in the neighbourhood of Lemnos and elsewhere; but a
pestilence of such extent and mortality was nowhere remembered. Neither
were the physicians at first of any service, ignorant as they were of the
proper way to treat it, but they died themselves the most thickly, as they
visited the sick most often; nor did any human art succeed any better.
Supplications in the temples, divinations, and so forth were found equally
futile, till the overwhelming nature of the disaster at last put a stop to
them altogether.</p>
<p>It first began, it is said, in the parts of Ethiopia above Egypt, and
thence descended into Egypt and Libya and into most of the King's country.
Suddenly falling upon Athens, it first attacked the population in Piraeus—which
was the occasion of their saying that the Peloponnesians had poisoned the
reservoirs, there being as yet no wells there—and afterwards
appeared in the upper city, when the deaths became much more frequent. All
speculation as to its origin and its causes, if causes can be found
adequate to produce so great a disturbance, I leave to other writers,
whether lay or professional; for myself, I shall simply set down its
nature, and explain the symptoms by which perhaps it may be recognized by
the student, if it should ever break out again. This I can the better do,
as I had the disease myself, and watched its operation in the case of
others.</p>
<p>That year then is admitted to have been otherwise unprecedentedly free
from sickness; and such few cases as occurred all determined in this. As a
rule, however, there was no ostensible cause; but people in good health
were all of a sudden attacked by violent heats in the head, and redness
and inflammation in the eyes, the inward parts, such as the throat or
tongue, becoming bloody and emitting an unnatural and fetid breath. These
symptoms were followed by sneezing and hoarseness, after which the pain
soon reached the chest, and produced a hard cough. When it fixed in the
stomach, it upset it; and discharges of bile of every kind named by
physicians ensued, accompanied by very great distress. In most cases also
an ineffectual retching followed, producing violent spasms, which in some
cases ceased soon after, in others much later. Externally the body was not
very hot to the touch, nor pale in its appearance, but reddish, livid, and
breaking out into small pustules and ulcers. But internally it burned so
that the patient could not bear to have on him clothing or linen even of
the very lightest description; or indeed to be otherwise than stark naked.
What they would have liked best would have been to throw themselves into
cold water; as indeed was done by some of the neglected sick, who plunged
into the rain-tanks in their agonies of unquenchable thirst; though it
made no difference whether they drank little or much. Besides this, the
miserable feeling of not being able to rest or sleep never ceased to
torment them. The body meanwhile did not waste away so long as the
distemper was at its height, but held out to a marvel against its ravages;
so that when they succumbed, as in most cases, on the seventh or eighth
day to the internal inflammation, they had still some strength in them.
But if they passed this stage, and the disease descended further into the
bowels, inducing a violent ulceration there accompanied by severe
diarrhoea, this brought on a weakness which was generally fatal. For the
disorder first settled in the head, ran its course from thence through the
whole of the body, and, even where it did not prove mortal, it still left
its mark on the extremities; for it settled in the privy parts, the
fingers and the toes, and many escaped with the loss of these, some too
with that of their eyes. Others again were seized with an entire loss of
memory on their first recovery, and did not know either themselves or
their friends.</p>
<p>But while the nature of the distemper was such as to baffle all
description, and its attacks almost too grievous for human nature to
endure, it was still in the following circumstance that its difference
from all ordinary disorders was most clearly shown. All the birds and
beasts that prey upon human bodies, either abstained from touching them
(though there were many lying unburied), or died after tasting them. In
proof of this, it was noticed that birds of this kind actually
disappeared; they were not about the bodies, or indeed to be seen at all.
But of course the effects which I have mentioned could best be studied in
a domestic animal like the dog.</p>
<p>Such then, if we pass over the varieties of particular cases which were
many and peculiar, were the general features of the distemper. Meanwhile
the town enjoyed an immunity from all the ordinary disorders; or if any
case occurred, it ended in this. Some died in neglect, others in the midst
of every attention. No remedy was found that could be used as a specific;
for what did good in one case, did harm in another. Strong and weak
constitutions proved equally incapable of resistance, all alike being
swept away, although dieted with the utmost precaution. By far the most
terrible feature in the malady was the dejection which ensued when any one
felt himself sickening, for the despair into which they instantly fell
took away their power of resistance, and left them a much easier prey to
the disorder; besides which, there was the awful spectacle of men dying
like sheep, through having caught the infection in nursing each other.
This caused the greatest mortality. On the one hand, if they were afraid
to visit each other, they perished from neglect; indeed many houses were
emptied of their inmates for want of a nurse: on the other, if they
ventured to do so, death was the consequence. This was especially the case
with such as made any pretensions to goodness: honour made them unsparing
of themselves in their attendance in their friends' houses, where even the
members of the family were at last worn out by the moans of the dying, and
succumbed to the force of the disaster. Yet it was with those who had
recovered from the disease that the sick and the dying found most
compassion. These knew what it was from experience, and had now no fear
for themselves; for the same man was never attacked twice—never at
least fatally. And such persons not only received the congratulations of
others, but themselves also, in the elation of the moment, half
entertained the vain hope that they were for the future safe from any
disease whatsoever.</p>
<p>An aggravation of the existing calamity was the influx from the country
into the city, and this was especially felt by the new arrivals. As there
were no houses to receive them, they had to be lodged at the hot season of
the year in stifling cabins, where the mortality raged without restraint.
The bodies of dying men lay one upon another, and half-dead creatures
reeled about the streets and gathered round all the fountains in their
longing for water. The sacred places also in which they had quartered
themselves were full of corpses of persons that had died there, just as
they were; for as the disaster passed all bounds, men, not knowing what
was to become of them, became utterly careless of everything, whether
sacred or profane. All the burial rites before in use were entirely upset,
and they buried the bodies as best they could. Many from want of the
proper appliances, through so many of their friends having died already,
had recourse to the most shameless sepultures: sometimes getting the start
of those who had raised a pile, they threw their own dead body upon the
stranger's pyre and ignited it; sometimes they tossed the corpse which
they were carrying on the top of another that was burning, and so went
off.</p>
<p>Nor was this the only form of lawless extravagance which owed its origin
to the plague. Men now coolly ventured on what they had formerly done in a
corner, and not just as they pleased, seeing the rapid transitions
produced by persons in prosperity suddenly dying and those who before had
nothing succeeding to their property. So they resolved to spend quickly
and enjoy themselves, regarding their lives and riches as alike things of
a day. Perseverance in what men called honour was popular with none, it
was so uncertain whether they would be spared to attain the object; but it
was settled that present enjoyment, and all that contributed to it, was
both honourable and useful. Fear of gods or law of man there was none to
restrain them. As for the first, they judged it to be just the same
whether they worshipped them or not, as they saw all alike perishing; and
for the last, no one expected to live to be brought to trial for his
offences, but each felt that a far severer sentence had been already
passed upon them all and hung ever over their heads, and before this fell
it was only reasonable to enjoy life a little.</p>
<p>Such was the nature of the calamity, and heavily did it weigh on the
Athenians; death raging within the city and devastation without. Among
other things which they remembered in their distress was, very naturally,
the following verse which the old men said had long ago been uttered:</p>
<p>A Dorian war shall come and with it death.<br/></p>
<p>So a dispute arose as to whether dearth and not death had not been the
word in the verse; but at the present juncture, it was of course decided
in favour of the latter; for the people made their recollection fit in
with their sufferings. I fancy, however, that if another Dorian war should
ever afterwards come upon us, and a dearth should happen to accompany it,
the verse will probably be read accordingly. The oracle also which had
been given to the Lacedaemonians was now remembered by those who knew of
it. When the god was asked whether they should go to war, he answered that
if they put their might into it, victory would be theirs, and that he
would himself be with them. With this oracle events were supposed to
tally. For the plague broke out as soon as the Peloponnesians invaded
Attica, and never entering Peloponnese (not at least to an extent worth
noticing), committed its worst ravages at Athens, and next to Athens, at
the most populous of the other towns. Such was the history of the plague.</p>
<p>After ravaging the plain, the Peloponnesians advanced into the Paralian
region as far as Laurium, where the Athenian silver mines are, and first
laid waste the side looking towards Peloponnese, next that which faces
Euboea and Andros. But Pericles, who was still general, held the same
opinion as in the former invasion, and would not let the Athenians march
out against them.</p>
<p>However, while they were still in the plain, and had not yet entered the
Paralian land, he had prepared an armament of a hundred ships for
Peloponnese, and when all was ready put out to sea. On board the ships he
took four thousand Athenian heavy infantry, and three hundred cavalry in
horse transports, and then for the first time made out of old galleys;
fifty Chian and Lesbian vessels also joining in the expedition. When this
Athenian armament put out to sea, they left the Peloponnesians in Attica
in the Paralian region. Arriving at Epidaurus in Peloponnese they ravaged
most of the territory, and even had hopes of taking the town by an
assault: in this however they were not successful. Putting out from
Epidaurus, they laid waste the territory of Troezen, Halieis, and
Hermione, all towns on the coast of Peloponnese, and thence sailing to
Prasiai, a maritime town in Laconia, ravaged part of its territory, and
took and sacked the place itself; after which they returned home, but
found the Peloponnesians gone and no longer in Attica.</p>
<p>During the whole time that the Peloponnesians were in Attica and the
Athenians on the expedition in their ships, men kept dying of the plague
both in the armament and in Athens. Indeed it was actually asserted that
the departure of the Peloponnesians was hastened by fear of the disorder;
as they heard from deserters that it was in the city, and also could see
the burials going on. Yet in this invasion they remained longer than in
any other, and ravaged the whole country, for they were about forty days
in Attica.</p>
<p>The same summer Hagnon, son of Nicias, and Cleopompus, son of Clinias, the
colleagues of Pericles, took the armament of which he had lately made use,
and went off upon an expedition against the Chalcidians in the direction
of Thrace and Potidaea, which was still under siege. As soon as they
arrived, they brought up their engines against Potidaea and tried every
means of taking it, but did not succeed either in capturing the city or in
doing anything else worthy of their preparations. For the plague attacked
them here also, and committed such havoc as to cripple them completely,
even the previously healthy soldiers of the former expedition catching the
infection from Hagnon's troops; while Phormio and the sixteen hundred men
whom he commanded only escaped by being no longer in the neighbourhood of
the Chalcidians. The end of it was that Hagnon returned with his ships to
Athens, having lost one thousand and fifty out of four thousand heavy
infantry in about forty days; though the soldiers stationed there before
remained in the country and carried on the siege of Potidaea.</p>
<p>After the second invasion of the Peloponnesians a change came over the
spirit of the Athenians. Their land had now been twice laid waste; and war
and pestilence at once pressed heavy upon them. They began to find fault
with Pericles, as the author of the war and the cause of all their
misfortunes, and became eager to come to terms with Lacedaemon, and
actually sent ambassadors thither, who did not however succeed in their
mission. Their despair was now complete and all vented itself upon
Pericles. When he saw them exasperated at the present turn of affairs and
acting exactly as he had anticipated, he called an assembly, being (it
must be remembered) still general, with the double object of restoring
confidence and of leading them from these angry feelings to a calmer and
more hopeful state of mind. He accordingly came forward and spoke as
follows:</p>
<p>"I was not unprepared for the indignation of which I have been the object,
as I know its causes; and I have called an assembly for the purpose of
reminding you upon certain points, and of protesting against your being
unreasonably irritated with me, or cowed by your sufferings. I am of
opinion that national greatness is more for the advantage of private
citizens, than any individual well-being coupled with public humiliation.
A man may be personally ever so well off, and yet if his country be ruined
he must be ruined with it; whereas a flourishing commonwealth always
affords chances of salvation to unfortunate individuals. Since then a
state can support the misfortunes of private citizens, while they cannot
support hers, it is surely the duty of every one to be forward in her
defence, and not like you to be so confounded with your domestic
afflictions as to give up all thoughts of the common safety, and to blame
me for having counselled war and yourselves for having voted it. And yet
if you are angry with me, it is with one who, as I believe, is second to
no man either in knowledge of the proper policy, or in the ability to
expound it, and who is moreover not only a patriot but an honest one. A
man possessing that knowledge without that faculty of exposition might as
well have no idea at all on the matter: if he had both these gifts, but no
love for his country, he would be but a cold advocate for her interests;
while were his patriotism not proof against bribery, everything would go
for a price. So that if you thought that I was even moderately
distinguished for these qualities when you took my advice and went to war,
there is certainly no reason now why I should be charged with having done
wrong.</p>
<p>"For those of course who have a free choice in the matter and whose
fortunes are not at stake, war is the greatest of follies. But if the only
choice was between submission with loss of independence, and danger with
the hope of preserving that independence, in such a case it is he who will
not accept the risk that deserves blame, not he who will. I am the same
man and do not alter, it is you who change, since in fact you took my
advice while unhurt, and waited for misfortune to repent of it; and the
apparent error of my policy lies in the infirmity of your resolution,
since the suffering that it entails is being felt by every one among you,
while its advantage is still remote and obscure to all, and a great and
sudden reverse having befallen you, your mind is too much depressed to
persevere in your resolves. For before what is sudden, unexpected, and
least within calculation, the spirit quails; and putting all else aside,
the plague has certainly been an emergency of this kind. Born, however, as
you are, citizens of a great state, and brought up, as you have been, with
habits equal to your birth, you should be ready to face the greatest
disasters and still to keep unimpaired the lustre of your name. For the
judgment of mankind is as relentless to the weakness that falls short of a
recognized renown, as it is jealous of the arrogance that aspires higher
than its due. Cease then to grieve for your private afflictions, and
address yourselves instead to the safety of the commonwealth.</p>
<p>"If you shrink before the exertions which the war makes necessary, and
fear that after all they may not have a happy result, you know the reasons
by which I have often demonstrated to you the groundlessness of your
apprehensions. If those are not enough, I will now reveal an advantage
arising from the greatness of your dominion, which I think has never yet
suggested itself to you, which I never mentioned in my previous speeches,
and which has so bold a sound that I should scarce adventure it now, were
it not for the unnatural depression which I see around me. You perhaps
think that your empire extends only over your allies; I will declare to
you the truth. The visible field of action has two parts, land and sea. In
the whole of one of these you are completely supreme, not merely as far as
you use it at present, but also to what further extent you may think fit:
in fine, your naval resources are such that your vessels may go where they
please, without the King or any other nation on earth being able to stop
them. So that although you may think it a great privation to lose the use
of your land and houses, still you must see that this power is something
widely different; and instead of fretting on their account, you should
really regard them in the light of the gardens and other accessories that
embellish a great fortune, and as, in comparison, of little moment. You
should know too that liberty preserved by your efforts will easily recover
for us what we have lost, while, the knee once bowed, even what you have
will pass from you. Your fathers receiving these possessions not from
others, but from themselves, did not let slip what their labour had
acquired, but delivered them safe to you; and in this respect at least you
must prove yourselves their equals, remembering that to lose what one has
got is more disgraceful than to be balked in getting, and you must
confront your enemies not merely with spirit but with disdain. Confidence
indeed a blissful ignorance can impart, ay, even to a coward's breast, but
disdain is the privilege of those who, like us, have been assured by
reflection of their superiority to their adversary. And where the chances
are the same, knowledge fortifies courage by the contempt which is its
consequence, its trust being placed, not in hope, which is the prop of the
desperate, but in a judgment grounded upon existing resources, whose
anticipations are more to be depended upon.</p>
<p>"Again, your country has a right to your services in sustaining the
glories of her position. These are a common source of pride to you all,
and you cannot decline the burdens of empire and still expect to share its
honours. You should remember also that what you are fighting against is
not merely slavery as an exchange for independence, but also loss of
empire and danger from the animosities incurred in its exercise. Besides,
to recede is no longer possible, if indeed any of you in the alarm of the
moment has become enamoured of the honesty of such an unambitious part.
For what you hold is, to speak somewhat plainly, a tyranny; to take it
perhaps was wrong, but to let it go is unsafe. And men of these retiring
views, making converts of others, would quickly ruin a state; indeed the
result would be the same if they could live independent by themselves; for
the retiring and unambitious are never secure without vigorous protectors
at their side; in fine, such qualities are useless to an imperial city,
though they may help a dependency to an unmolested servitude.</p>
<p>"But you must not be seduced by citizens like these or angry with me—who,
if I voted for war, only did as you did yourselves—in spite of the
enemy having invaded your country and done what you could be certain that
he would do, if you refused to comply with his demands; and although
besides what we counted for, the plague has come upon us—the only
point indeed at which our calculation has been at fault. It is this, I
know, that has had a large share in making me more unpopular than I should
otherwise have been—quite undeservedly, unless you are also prepared
to give me the credit of any success with which chance may present you.
Besides, the hand of heaven must be borne with resignation, that of the
enemy with fortitude; this was the old way at Athens, and do not you
prevent it being so still. Remember, too, that if your country has the
greatest name in all the world, it is because she never bent before
disaster; because she has expended more life and effort in war than any
other city, and has won for herself a power greater than any hitherto
known, the memory of which will descend to the latest posterity; even if
now, in obedience to the general law of decay, we should ever be forced to
yield, still it will be remembered that we held rule over more Hellenes
than any other Hellenic state, that we sustained the greatest wars against
their united or separate powers, and inhabited a city unrivalled by any
other in resources or magnitude. These glories may incur the censure of
the slow and unambitious; but in the breast of energy they will awake
emulation, and in those who must remain without them an envious regret.
Hatred and unpopularity at the moment have fallen to the lot of all who
have aspired to rule others; but where odium must be incurred, true wisdom
incurs it for the highest objects. Hatred also is short-lived; but that
which makes the splendour of the present and the glory of the future
remains for ever unforgotten. Make your decision, therefore, for glory
then and honour now, and attain both objects by instant and zealous
effort: do not send heralds to Lacedaemon, and do not betray any sign of
being oppressed by your present sufferings, since they whose minds are
least sensitive to calamity, and whose hands are most quick to meet it,
are the greatest men and the greatest communities."</p>
<p>Such were the arguments by which Pericles tried to cure the Athenians of
their anger against him and to divert their thoughts from their immediate
afflictions. As a community he succeeded in convincing them; they not only
gave up all idea of sending to Lacedaemon, but applied themselves with
increased energy to the war; still as private individuals they could not
help smarting under their sufferings, the common people having been
deprived of the little that they were possessed, while the higher orders
had lost fine properties with costly establishments and buildings in the
country, and, worst of all, had war instead of peace. In fact, the public
feeling against him did not subside until he had been fined. Not long
afterwards, however, according to the way of the multitude, they again
elected him general and committed all their affairs to his hands, having
now become less sensitive to their private and domestic afflictions, and
understanding that he was the best man of all for the public necessities.
For as long as he was at the head of the state during the peace, he
pursued a moderate and conservative policy; and in his time its greatness
was at its height. When the war broke out, here also he seems to have
rightly gauged the power of his country. He outlived its commencement two
years and six months, and the correctness of his previsions respecting it
became better known by his death. He told them to wait quietly, to pay
attention to their marine, to attempt no new conquests, and to expose the
city to no hazards during the war, and doing this, promised them a
favourable result. What they did was the very contrary, allowing private
ambitions and private interests, in matters apparently quite foreign to
the war, to lead them into projects unjust both to themselves and to their
allies—projects whose success would only conduce to the honour and
advantage of private persons, and whose failure entailed certain disaster
on the country in the war. The causes of this are not far to seek.
Pericles indeed, by his rank, ability, and known integrity, was enabled to
exercise an independent control over the multitude—in short, to lead
them instead of being led by them; for as he never sought power by
improper means, he was never compelled to flatter them, but, on the
contrary, enjoyed so high an estimation that he could afford to anger them
by contradiction. Whenever he saw them unseasonably and insolently elated,
he would with a word reduce them to alarm; on the other hand, if they fell
victims to a panic, he could at once restore them to confidence. In short,
what was nominally a democracy became in his hands government by the first
citizen. With his successors it was different. More on a level with one
another, and each grasping at supremacy, they ended by committing even the
conduct of state affairs to the whims of the multitude. This, as might
have been expected in a great and sovereign state, produced a host of
blunders, and amongst them the Sicilian expedition; though this failed not
so much through a miscalculation of the power of those against whom it was
sent, as through a fault in the senders in not taking the best measures
afterwards to assist those who had gone out, but choosing rather to occupy
themselves with private cabals for the leadership of the commons, by which
they not only paralysed operations in the field, but also first introduced
civil discord at home. Yet after losing most of their fleet besides other
forces in Sicily, and with faction already dominant in the city, they
could still for three years make head against their original adversaries,
joined not only by the Sicilians, but also by their own allies nearly all
in revolt, and at last by the King's son, Cyrus, who furnished the funds
for the Peloponnesian navy. Nor did they finally succumb till they fell
the victims of their own intestine disorders. So superfluously abundant
were the resources from which the genius of Pericles foresaw an easy
triumph in the war over the unaided forces of the Peloponnesians.</p>
<p>During the same summer the Lacedaemonians and their allies made an
expedition with a hundred ships against Zacynthus, an island lying off the
coast of Elis, peopled by a colony of Achaeans from Peloponnese, and in
alliance with Athens. There were a thousand Lacedaemonian heavy infantry
on board, and Cnemus, a Spartan, as admiral. They made a descent from
their ships, and ravaged most of the country; but as the inhabitants would
not submit, they sailed back home.</p>
<p>At the end of the same summer the Corinthian Aristeus, Aneristus,
Nicolaus, and Stratodemus, envoys from Lacedaemon, Timagoras, a Tegean,
and a private individual named Pollis from Argos, on their way to Asia to
persuade the King to supply funds and join in the war, came to Sitalces,
son of Teres in Thrace, with the idea of inducing him, if possible, to
forsake the alliance of Athens and to march on Potidaea then besieged by
an Athenian force, and also of getting conveyed by his means to their
destination across the Hellespont to Pharnabazus, who was to send them up
the country to the King. But there chanced to be with Sitalces some
Athenian ambassadors—Learchus, son of Callimachus, and Ameiniades,
son of Philemon—who persuaded Sitalces' son, Sadocus, the new
Athenian citizen, to put the men into their hands and thus prevent their
crossing over to the King and doing their part to injure the country of
his choice. He accordingly had them seized, as they were travelling
through Thrace to the vessel in which they were to cross the Hellespont,
by a party whom he had sent on with Learchus and Ameiniades, and gave
orders for their delivery to the Athenian ambassadors, by whom they were
brought to Athens. On their arrival, the Athenians, afraid that Aristeus,
who had been notably the prime mover in the previous affairs of Potidaea
and their Thracian possessions, might live to do them still more mischief
if he escaped, slew them all the same day, without giving them a trial or
hearing the defence which they wished to offer, and cast their bodies into
a pit; thinking themselves justified in using in retaliation the same mode
of warfare which the Lacedaemonians had begun, when they slew and cast
into pits all the Athenian and allied traders whom they caught on board
the merchantmen round Peloponnese. Indeed, at the outset of the war, the
Lacedaemonians butchered as enemies all whom they took on the sea, whether
allies of Athens or neutrals.</p>
<p>About the same time towards the close of the summer, the Ambraciot forces,
with a number of barbarians that they had raised, marched against the
Amphilochian Argos and the rest of that country. The origin of their
enmity against the Argives was this. This Argos and the rest of
Amphilochia were colonized by Amphilochus, son of Amphiaraus. Dissatisfied
with the state of affairs at home on his return thither after the Trojan
War, he built this city in the Ambracian Gulf, and named it Argos after
his own country. This was the largest town in Amphilochia, and its
inhabitants the most powerful. Under the pressure of misfortune many
generations afterwards, they called in the Ambraciots, their neighbours on
the Amphilochian border, to join their colony; and it was by this union
with the Ambraciots that they learnt their present Hellenic speech, the
rest of the Amphilochians being barbarians. After a time the Ambraciots
expelled the Argives and held the city themselves. Upon this the
Amphilochians gave themselves over to the Acarnanians; and the two
together called the Athenians, who sent them Phormio as general and thirty
ships; upon whose arrival they took Argos by storm, and made slaves of the
Ambraciots; and the Amphilochians and Acarnanians inhabited the town in
common. After this began the alliance between the Athenians and
Acarnanians. The enmity of the Ambraciots against the Argives thus
commenced with the enslavement of their citizens; and afterwards during
the war they collected this armament among themselves and the Chaonians,
and other of the neighbouring barbarians. Arrived before Argos, they
became masters of the country; but not being successful in their attacks
upon the town, returned home and dispersed among their different peoples.</p>
<p>Such were the events of the summer. The ensuing winter the Athenians sent
twenty ships round Peloponnese, under the command of Phormio, who
stationed himself at Naupactus and kept watch against any one sailing in
or out of Corinth and the Crissaean Gulf. Six others went to Caria and
Lycia under Melesander, to collect tribute in those parts, and also to
prevent the Peloponnesian privateers from taking up their station in those
waters and molesting the passage of the merchantmen from Phaselis and
Phoenicia and the adjoining continent. However, Melesander, going up the
country into Lycia with a force of Athenians from the ships and the
allies, was defeated and killed in battle, with the loss of a number of
his troops.</p>
<p>The same winter the Potidaeans at length found themselves no longer able
to hold out against their besiegers. The inroads of the Peloponnesians
into Attica had not had the desired effect of making the Athenians raise
the siege. Provisions there were none left; and so far had distress for
food gone in Potidaea that, besides a number of other horrors, instances
had even occurred of the people having eaten one another. In this
extremity they at last made proposals for capitulating to the Athenian
generals in command against them—Xenophon, son of Euripides,
Hestiodorus, son of Aristocleides, and Phanomachus, son of Callimachus.
The generals accepted their proposals, seeing the sufferings of the army
in so exposed a position; besides which the state had already spent two
thousand talents upon the siege. The terms of the capitulation were as
follows: a free passage out for themselves, their children, wives and
auxiliaries, with one garment apiece, the women with two, and a fixed sum
of money for their journey. Under this treaty they went out to Chalcidice
and other places, according as was their power. The Athenians, however,
blamed the generals for granting terms without instructions from home,
being of opinion that the place would have had to surrender at discretion.
They afterwards sent settlers of their own to Potidaea, and colonized it.
Such were the events of the winter, and so ended the second year of this
war of which Thucydides was the historian.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />