<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0011" id="link2H_4_0011"></SPAN></p>
<h2> BOOK III </h2>
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0009" id="link2HCH0009"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER IX </h2>
<h3> <i>Fourth and Fifth Years of the War—Revolt of Mitylene</i> </h3>
<p>The next summer, just as the corn was getting ripe, the Peloponnesians and
their allies invaded Attica under the command of Archidamus, son of
Zeuxidamus, king of the Lacedaemonians, and sat down and ravaged the land;
the Athenian horse as usual attacking them, wherever it was practicable,
and preventing the mass of the light troops from advancing from their camp
and wasting the parts near the city. After staying the time for which they
had taken provisions, the invaders retired and dispersed to their several
cities.</p>
<p>Immediately after the invasion of the Peloponnesians all Lesbos, except
Methymna, revolted from the Athenians. The Lesbians had wished to revolt
even before the war, but the Lacedaemonians would not receive them; and
yet now when they did revolt, they were compelled to do so sooner than
they had intended. While they were waiting until the moles for their
harbours and the ships and walls that they had in building should be
finished, and for the arrival of archers and corn and other things that
they were engaged in fetching from the Pontus, the Tenedians, with whom
they were at enmity, and the Methymnians, and some factious persons in
Mitylene itself, who were proxeni of Athens, informed the Athenians that
the Mitylenians were forcibly uniting the island under their sovereignty,
and that the preparations about which they were so active, were all
concerted with the Boeotians their kindred and the Lacedaemonians with a
view to a revolt, and that, unless they were immediately prevented, Athens
would lose Lesbos.</p>
<p>However, the Athenians, distressed by the plague, and by the war that had
recently broken out and was now raging, thought it a serious matter to add
Lesbos with its fleet and untouched resources to the list of their
enemies; and at first would not believe the charge, giving too much weight
to their wish that it might not be true. But when an embassy which they
sent had failed to persuade the Mitylenians to give up the union and
preparations complained of, they became alarmed, and resolved to strike
the first blow. They accordingly suddenly sent off forty ships that had
been got ready to sail round Peloponnese, under the command of Cleippides,
son of Deinias, and two others; word having been brought them of a
festival in honour of the Malean Apollo outside the town, which is kept by
the whole people of Mitylene, and at which, if haste were made, they might
hope to take them by surprise. If this plan succeeded, well and good; if
not, they were to order the Mitylenians to deliver up their ships and to
pull down their walls, and if they did not obey, to declare war. The ships
accordingly set out; the ten galleys, forming the contingent of the
Mitylenians present with the fleet according to the terms of the alliance,
being detained by the Athenians, and their crews placed in custody.
However, the Mitylenians were informed of the expedition by a man who
crossed from Athens to Euboea, and going overland to Geraestus, sailed
from thence by a merchantman which he found on the point of putting to
sea, and so arrived at Mitylene the third day after leaving Athens. The
Mitylenians accordingly refrained from going out to the temple at Malea,
and moreover barricaded and kept guard round the half-finished parts of
their walls and harbours.</p>
<p>When the Athenians sailed in not long after and saw how things stood, the
generals delivered their orders, and upon the Mitylenians refusing to
obey, commenced hostilities. The Mitylenians, thus compelled to go to war
without notice and unprepared, at first sailed out with their fleet and
made some show of fighting, a little in front of the harbour; but being
driven back by the Athenian ships, immediately offered to treat with the
commanders, wishing, if possible, to get the ships away for the present
upon any tolerable terms. The Athenian commanders accepted their offers,
being themselves fearful that they might not be able to cope with the
whole of Lesbos; and an armistice having been concluded, the Mitylenians
sent to Athens one of the informers, already repentant of his conduct, and
others with him, to try to persuade the Athenians of the innocence of
their intentions and to get the fleet recalled. In the meantime, having no
great hope of a favourable answer from Athens, they also sent off a galley
with envoys to Lacedaemon, unobserved by the Athenian fleet which was
anchored at Malea to the north of the town.</p>
<p>While these envoys, reaching Lacedaemon after a difficult journey across
the open sea, were negotiating for succours being sent them, the
ambassadors from Athens returned without having effected anything; and
hostilities were at once begun by the Mitylenians and the rest of Lesbos,
with the exception of the Methymnians, who came to the aid of the
Athenians with the Imbrians and Lemnians and some few of the other allies.
The Mitylenians made a sortie with all their forces against the Athenian
camp; and a battle ensued, in which they gained some slight advantage, but
retired notwithstanding, not feeling sufficient confidence in themselves
to spend the night upon the field. After this they kept quiet, wishing to
wait for the chance of reinforcements arriving from Peloponnese before
making a second venture, being encouraged by the arrival of Meleas, a
Laconian, and Hermaeondas, a Theban, who had been sent off before the
insurrection but had been unable to reach Lesbos before the Athenian
expedition, and who now stole in in a galley after the battle, and advised
them to send another galley and envoys back with them, which the
Mitylenians accordingly did.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Athenians, greatly encouraged by the inaction of the
Mitylenians, summoned allies to their aid, who came in all the quicker
from seeing so little vigour displayed by the Lesbians, and bringing round
their ships to a new station to the south of the town, fortified two
camps, one on each side of the city, and instituted a blockade of both the
harbours. The sea was thus closed against the Mitylenians, who, however,
commanded the whole country, with the rest of the Lesbians who had now
joined them; the Athenians only holding a limited area round their camps,
and using Malea more as the station for their ships and their market.</p>
<p>While the war went on in this way at Mitylene, the Athenians, about the
same time in this summer, also sent thirty ships to Peloponnese under
Asopius, son of Phormio; the Acarnanians insisting that the commander sent
should be some son or relative of Phormio. As the ships coasted along
shore they ravaged the seaboard of Laconia; after which Asopius sent most
of the fleet home, and himself went on with twelve vessels to Naupactus,
and afterwards raising the whole Acarnanian population made an expedition
against Oeniadae, the fleet sailing along the Achelous, while the army
laid waste the country. The inhabitants, however, showing no signs of
submitting, he dismissed the land forces and himself sailed to Leucas, and
making a descent upon Nericus was cut off during his retreat, and most of
his troops with him, by the people in those parts aided by some
coastguards; after which the Athenians sailed away, recovering their dead
from the Leucadians under truce.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the envoys of the Mitylenians sent out in the first ship were
told by the Lacedaemonians to come to Olympia, in order that the rest of
the allies might hear them and decide upon their matter, and so they
journeyed thither. It was the Olympiad in which the Rhodian Dorieus gained
his second victory, and the envoys having been introduced to make their
speech after the festival, spoke as follows:</p>
<p>"Lacedaemonians and allies, the rule established among the Hellenes is not
unknown to us. Those who revolt in war and forsake their former
confederacy are favourably regarded by those who receive them, in so far
as they are of use to them, but otherwise are thought less well of,
through being considered traitors to their former friends. Nor is this an
unfair way of judging, where the rebels and the power from whom they
secede are at one in policy and sympathy, and a match for each other in
resources and power, and where no reasonable ground exists for the
rebellion. But with us and the Athenians this was not the case; and no one
need think the worse of us for revolting from them in danger, after having
been honoured by them in time of peace.</p>
<p>"Justice and honesty will be the first topics of our speech, especially as
we are asking for alliance; because we know that there can never be any
solid friendship between individuals, or union between communities that is
worth the name, unless the parties be persuaded of each other's honesty,
and be generally congenial the one to the other; since from difference in
feeling springs also difference in conduct. Between ourselves and the
Athenians alliance began, when you withdrew from the Median War and they
remained to finish the business. But we did not become allies of the
Athenians for the subjugation of the Hellenes, but allies of the Hellenes
for their liberation from the Mede; and as long as the Athenians led us
fairly we followed them loyally; but when we saw them relax their
hostility to the Mede, to try to compass the subjection of the allies,
then our apprehensions began. Unable, however, to unite and defend
themselves, on account of the number of confederates that had votes, all
the allies were enslaved, except ourselves and the Chians, who continued
to send our contingents as independent and nominally free. Trust in Athens
as a leader, however, we could no longer feel, judging by the examples
already given; it being unlikely that she would reduce our fellow
confederates, and not do the same by us who were left, if ever she had the
power.</p>
<p>"Had we all been still independent, we could have had more faith in their
not attempting any change; but the greater number being their subjects,
while they were treating us as equals, they would naturally chafe under
this solitary instance of independence as contrasted with the submission
of the majority; particularly as they daily grew more powerful, and we
more destitute. Now the only sure basis of an alliance is for each party
to be equally afraid of the other; he who would like to encroach is then
deterred by the reflection that he will not have odds in his favour.
Again, if we were left independent, it was only because they thought they
saw their way to empire more clearly by specious language and by the paths
of policy than by those of force. Not only were we useful as evidence that
powers who had votes, like themselves, would not, surely, join them in
their expeditions, against their will, without the party attacked being in
the wrong; but the same system also enabled them to lead the stronger
states against the weaker first, and so to leave the former to the last,
stripped of their natural allies, and less capable of resistance. But if
they had begun with us, while all the states still had their resources
under their own control, and there was a centre to rally round, the work
of subjugation would have been found less easy. Besides this, our navy
gave them some apprehension: it was always possible that it might unite
with you or with some other power, and become dangerous to Athens. The
court which we paid to their commons and its leaders for the time being
also helped us to maintain our independence. However, we did not expect to
be able to do so much longer, if this war had not broken out, from the
examples that we had had of their conduct to the rest.</p>
<p>"How then could we put our trust in such friendship or freedom as we had
here? We accepted each other against our inclination; fear made them court
us in war, and us them in peace; sympathy, the ordinary basis of
confidence, had its place supplied by terror, fear having more share than
friendship in detaining us in the alliance; and the first party that
should be encouraged by the hope of impunity was certain to break faith
with the other. So that to condemn us for being the first to break off,
because they delay the blow that we dread, instead of ourselves delaying
to know for certain whether it will be dealt or not, is to take a false
view of the case. For if we were equally able with them to meet their
plots and imitate their delay, we should be their equals and should be
under no necessity of being their subjects; but the liberty of offence
being always theirs, that of defence ought clearly to be ours.</p>
<p>"Such, Lacedaemonians and allies, are the grounds and the reasons of our
revolt; clear enough to convince our hearers of the fairness of our
conduct, and sufficient to alarm ourselves, and to make us turn to some
means of safety. This we wished to do long ago, when we sent to you on the
subject while the peace yet lasted, but were balked by your refusing to
receive us; and now, upon the Boeotians inviting us, we at once responded
to the call, and decided upon a twofold revolt, from the Hellenes and from
the Athenians, not to aid the latter in harming the former, but to join in
their liberation, and not to allow the Athenians in the end to destroy us,
but to act in time against them. Our revolt, however, has taken place
prematurely and without preparation—a fact which makes it all the
more incumbent on you to receive us into alliance and to send us speedy
relief, in order to show that you support your friends, and at the same
time do harm to your enemies. You have an opportunity such as you never
had before. Disease and expenditure have wasted the Athenians: their ships
are either cruising round your coasts, or engaged in blockading us; and it
is not probable that they will have any to spare, if you invade them a
second time this summer by sea and land; but they will either offer no
resistance to your vessels, or withdraw from both our shores. Nor must it
be thought that this is a case of putting yourselves into danger for a
country which is not yours. Lesbos may appear far off, but when help is
wanted she will be found near enough. It is not in Attica that the war
will be decided, as some imagine, but in the countries by which Attica is
supported; and the Athenian revenue is drawn from the allies, and will
become still larger if they reduce us; as not only will no other state
revolt, but our resources will be added to theirs, and we shall be treated
worse than those that were enslaved before. But if you will frankly
support us, you will add to your side a state that has a large navy, which
is your great want; you will smooth the way to the overthrow of the
Athenians by depriving them of their allies, who will be greatly
encouraged to come over; and you will free yourselves from the imputation
made against you, of not supporting insurrection. In short, only show
yourselves as liberators, and you may count upon having the advantage in
the war.</p>
<p>"Respect, therefore, the hopes placed in you by the Hellenes, and that
Olympian Zeus, in whose temple we stand as very suppliants; become the
allies and defenders of the Mitylenians, and do not sacrifice us, who put
our lives upon the hazard, in a cause in which general good will result to
all from our success, and still more general harm if we fail through your
refusing to help us; but be the men that the Hellenes think you, and our
fears desire."</p>
<p>Such were the words of the Mitylenians. After hearing them out, the
Lacedaemonians and confederates granted what they urged, and took the
Lesbians into alliance, and deciding in favour of the invasion of Attica,
told the allies present to march as quickly as possible to the Isthmus
with two-thirds of their forces; and arriving there first themselves, got
ready hauling machines to carry their ships across from Corinth to the sea
on the side of Athens, in order to make their attack by sea and land at
once. However, the zeal which they displayed was not imitated by the rest
of the confederates, who came in but slowly, being engaged in harvesting
their corn and sick of making expeditions.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Athenians, aware that the preparations of the enemy were due
to his conviction of their weakness, and wishing to show him that he was
mistaken, and that they were able, without moving the Lesbian fleet, to
repel with ease that with which they were menaced from Peloponnese, manned
a hundred ships by embarking the citizens of Athens, except the knights
and Pentacosiomedimni, and the resident aliens; and putting out to the
Isthmus, displayed their power, and made descents upon Peloponnese
wherever they pleased. A disappointment so signal made the Lacedaemonians
think that the Lesbians had not spoken the truth; and embarrassed by the
non-appearance of the confederates, coupled with the news that the thirty
ships round Peloponnese were ravaging the lands near Sparta, they went
back home. Afterwards, however, they got ready a fleet to send to Lesbos,
and ordering a total of forty ships from the different cities in the
league, appointed Alcidas to command the expedition in his capacity of
high admiral. Meanwhile the Athenians in the hundred ships, upon seeing
the Lacedaemonians go home, went home likewise.</p>
<p>If, at the time that this fleet was at sea, Athens had almost the largest
number of first-rate ships in commission that she ever possessed at any
one moment, she had as many or even more when the war began. At that time
one hundred guarded Attica, Euboea, and Salamis; a hundred more were
cruising round Peloponnese, besides those employed at Potidaea and in
other places; making a grand total of two hundred and fifty vessels
employed on active service in a single summer. It was this, with Potidaea,
that most exhausted her revenues—Potidaea being blockaded by a force
of heavy infantry (each drawing two drachmae a day, one for himself and
another for his servant), which amounted to three thousand at first, and
was kept at this number down to the end of the siege; besides sixteen
hundred with Phormio who went away before it was over; and the ships being
all paid at the same rate. In this way her money was wasted at first; and
this was the largest number of ships ever manned by her.</p>
<p>About the same time that the Lacedaemonians were at the Isthmus, the
Mitylenians marched by land with their mercenaries against Methymna, which
they thought to gain by treachery. After assaulting the town, and not
meeting with the success that they anticipated, they withdrew to Antissa,
Pyrrha, and Eresus; and taking measures for the better security of these
towns and strengthening their walls, hastily returned home. After their
departure the Methymnians marched against Antissa, but were defeated in a
sortie by the Antissians and their mercenaries, and retreated in haste
after losing many of their number. Word of this reaching Athens, and the
Athenians learning that the Mitylenians were masters of the country and
their own soldiers unable to hold them in check, they sent out about the
beginning of autumn Paches, son of Epicurus, to take the command, and a
thousand Athenian heavy infantry; who worked their own passage and,
arriving at Mitylene, built a single wall all round it, forts being
erected at some of the strongest points. Mitylene was thus blockaded
strictly on both sides, by land and by sea; and winter now drew near.</p>
<p>The Athenians needing money for the siege, although they had for the first
time raised a contribution of two hundred talents from their own citizens,
now sent out twelve ships to levy subsidies from their allies, with
Lysicles and four others in command. After cruising to different places
and laying them under contribution, Lysicles went up the country from
Myus, in Caria, across the plain of the Meander, as far as the hill of
Sandius; and being attacked by the Carians and the people of Anaia, was
slain with many of his soldiers.</p>
<p>The same winter the Plataeans, who were still being besieged by the
Peloponnesians and Boeotians, distressed by the failure of their
provisions, and seeing no hope of relief from Athens, nor any other means
of safety, formed a scheme with the Athenians besieged with them for
escaping, if possible, by forcing their way over the enemy's walls; the
attempt having been suggested by Theaenetus, son of Tolmides, a
soothsayer, and Eupompides, son of Daimachus, one of their generals. At
first all were to join: afterwards, half hung back, thinking the risk
great; about two hundred and twenty, however, voluntarily persevered in
the attempt, which was carried out in the following way. Ladders were made
to match the height of the enemy's wall, which they measured by the layers
of bricks, the side turned towards them not being thoroughly whitewashed.
These were counted by many persons at once; and though some might miss the
right calculation, most would hit upon it, particularly as they counted
over and over again, and were no great way from the wall, but could see it
easily enough for their purpose. The length required for the ladders was
thus obtained, being calculated from the breadth of the brick.</p>
<p>Now the wall of the Peloponnesians was constructed as follows. It
consisted of two lines drawn round the place, one against the Plataeans,
the other against any attack on the outside from Athens, about sixteen
feet apart. The intermediate space of sixteen feet was occupied by huts
portioned out among the soldiers on guard, and built in one block, so as
to give the appearance of a single thick wall with battlements on either
side. At intervals of every ten battlements were towers of considerable
size, and the same breadth as the wall, reaching right across from its
inner to its outer face, with no means of passing except through the
middle. Accordingly on stormy and wet nights the battlements were
deserted, and guard kept from the towers, which were not far apart and
roofed in above.</p>
<p>Such being the structure of the wall by which the Plataeans were
blockaded, when their preparations were completed, they waited for a
stormy night of wind and rain and without any moon, and then set out,
guided by the authors of the enterprise. Crossing first the ditch that ran
round the town, they next gained the wall of the enemy unperceived by the
sentinels, who did not see them in the darkness, or hear them, as the wind
drowned with its roar the noise of their approach; besides which they kept
a good way off from each other, that they might not be betrayed by the
clash of their weapons. They were also lightly equipped, and had only the
left foot shod to preserve them from slipping in the mire. They came up to
the battlements at one of the intermediate spaces where they knew them to
be unguarded: those who carried the ladders went first and planted them;
next twelve light-armed soldiers with only a dagger and a breastplate
mounted, led by Ammias, son of Coroebus, who was the first on the wall;
his followers getting up after him and going six to each of the towers.
After these came another party of light troops armed with spears, whose
shields, that they might advance the easier, were carried by men behind,
who were to hand them to them when they found themselves in presence of
the enemy. After a good many had mounted they were discovered by the
sentinels in the towers, by the noise made by a tile which was knocked
down by one of the Plataeans as he was laying hold of the battlements. The
alarm was instantly given, and the troops rushed to the wall, not knowing
the nature of the danger, owing to the dark night and stormy weather; the
Plataeans in the town having also chosen that moment to make a sortie
against the wall of the Peloponnesians upon the side opposite to that on
which their men were getting over, in order to divert the attention of the
besiegers. Accordingly they remained distracted at their several posts,
without any venturing to stir to give help from his own station, and at a
loss to guess what was going on. Meanwhile the three hundred set aside for
service on emergencies went outside the wall in the direction of the
alarm. Fire-signals of an attack were also raised towards Thebes; but the
Plataeans in the town at once displayed a number of others, prepared
beforehand for this very purpose, in order to render the enemy's signals
unintelligible, and to prevent his friends getting a true idea of what was
passing and coming to his aid before their comrades who had gone out
should have made good their escape and be in safety.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the first of the scaling party that had got up, after carrying
both the towers and putting the sentinels to the sword, posted themselves
inside to prevent any one coming through against them; and rearing ladders
from the wall, sent several men up on the towers, and from their summit
and base kept in check all of the enemy that came up, with their missiles,
while their main body planted a number of ladders against the wall, and
knocking down the battlements, passed over between the towers; each as
soon as he had got over taking up his station at the edge of the ditch,
and plying from thence with arrows and darts any who came along the wall
to stop the passage of his comrades. When all were over, the party on the
towers came down, the last of them not without difficulty, and proceeded
to the ditch, just as the three hundred came up carrying torches. The
Plataeans, standing on the edge of the ditch in the dark, had a good view
of their opponents, and discharged their arrows and darts upon the unarmed
parts of their bodies, while they themselves could not be so well seen in
the obscurity for the torches; and thus even the last of them got over the
ditch, though not without effort and difficulty; as ice had formed in it,
not strong enough to walk upon, but of that watery kind which generally
comes with a wind more east than north, and the snow which this wind had
caused to fall during the night had made the water in the ditch rise, so
that they could scarcely breast it as they crossed. However, it was mainly
the violence of the storm that enabled them to effect their escape at all.</p>
<p>Starting from the ditch, the Plataeans went all together along the road
leading to Thebes, keeping the chapel of the hero Androcrates upon their
right; considering that the last road which the Peloponnesians would
suspect them of having taken would be that towards their enemies' country.
Indeed they could see them pursuing with torches upon the Athens road
towards Cithaeron and Druoskephalai or Oakheads. After going for rather
more than half a mile upon the road to Thebes, the Plataeans turned off
and took that leading to the mountain, to Erythrae and Hysiae, and
reaching the hills, made good their escape to Athens, two hundred and
twelve men in all; some of their number having turned back into the town
before getting over the wall, and one archer having been taken prisoner at
the outer ditch. Meanwhile the Peloponnesians gave up the pursuit and
returned to their posts; and the Plataeans in the town, knowing nothing of
what had passed, and informed by those who had turned back that not a man
had escaped, sent out a herald as soon as it was day to make a truce for
the recovery of the dead bodies, and then, learning the truth, desisted.
In this way the Plataean party got over and were saved.</p>
<p>Towards the close of the same winter, Salaethus, a Lacedaemonian, was sent
out in a galley from Lacedaemon to Mitylene. Going by sea to Pyrrha, and
from thence overland, he passed along the bed of a torrent, where the line
of circumvallation was passable, and thus entering unperceived into
Mitylene told the magistrates that Attica would certainly be invaded, and
the forty ships destined to relieve them arrive, and that he had been sent
on to announce this and to superintend matters generally. The Mitylenians
upon this took courage, and laid aside the idea of treating with the
Athenians; and now this winter ended, and with it ended the fourth year of
the war of which Thucydides was the historian.</p>
<p>The next summer the Peloponnesians sent off the forty-two ships for
Mitylene, under Alcidas, their high admiral, and themselves and their
allies invaded Attica, their object being to distract the Athenians by a
double movement, and thus to make it less easy for them to act against the
fleet sailing to Mitylene. The commander in this invasion was Cleomenes,
in the place of King Pausanias, son of Pleistoanax, his nephew, who was
still a minor. Not content with laying waste whatever had shot up in the
parts which they had before devastated, the invaders now extended their
ravages to lands passed over in their previous incursions; so that this
invasion was more severely felt by the Athenians than any except the
second; the enemy staying on and on until they had overrun most of the
country, in the expectation of hearing from Lesbos of something having
been achieved by their fleet, which they thought must now have got over.
However, as they did not obtain any of the results expected, and their
provisions began to run short, they retreated and dispersed to their
different cities.</p>
<p>In the meantime the Mitylenians, finding their provisions failing, while
the fleet from Peloponnese was loitering on the way instead of appearing
at Mitylene, were compelled to come to terms with the Athenians in the
following manner. Salaethus having himself ceased to expect the fleet to
arrive, now armed the commons with heavy armour, which they had not before
possessed, with the intention of making a sortie against the Athenians.
The commons, however, no sooner found themselves possessed of arms than
they refused any longer to obey their officers; and forming in knots
together, told the authorities to bring out in public the provisions and
divide them amongst them all, or they would themselves come to terms with
the Athenians and deliver up the city.</p>
<p>The government, aware of their inability to prevent this, and of the
danger they would be in, if left out of the capitulation, publicly agreed
with Paches and the army to surrender Mitylene at discretion and to admit
the troops into the town; upon the understanding that the Mitylenians
should be allowed to send an embassy to Athens to plead their cause, and
that Paches should not imprison, make slaves of, or put to death any of
the citizens until its return. Such were the terms of the capitulation; in
spite of which the chief authors of the negotiation with Lacedaemon were
so completely overcome by terror when the army entered that they went and
seated themselves by the altars, from which they were raised up by Paches
under promise that he would do them no wrong, and lodged by him in
Tenedos, until he should learn the pleasure of the Athenians concerning
them. Paches also sent some galleys and seized Antissa, and took such
other military measures as he thought advisable.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Peloponnesians in the forty ships, who ought to have made
all haste to relieve Mitylene, lost time in coming round Peloponnese
itself, and proceeding leisurely on the remainder of the voyage, made
Delos without having been seen by the Athenians at Athens, and from thence
arriving at Icarus and Myconus, there first heard of the fall of Mitylene.
Wishing to know the truth, they put into Embatum, in the Erythraeid, about
seven days after the capture of the town. Here they learned the truth, and
began to consider what they were to do; and Teutiaplus, an Elean,
addressed them as follows:</p>
<p>"Alcidas and Peloponnesians who share with me the command of this
armament, my advice is to sail just as we are to Mitylene, before we have
been heard of. We may expect to find the Athenians as much off their guard
as men generally are who have just taken a city: this will certainly be so
by sea, where they have no idea of any enemy attacking them, and where our
strength, as it happens, mainly lies; while even their land forces are
probably scattered about the houses in the carelessness of victory. If
therefore we were to fall upon them suddenly and in the night, I have
hopes, with the help of the well-wishers that we may have left inside the
town, that we shall become masters of the place. Let us not shrink from
the risk, but let us remember that this is just the occasion for one of
the baseless panics common in war: and that to be able to guard against
these in one's own case, and to detect the moment when an attack will find
an enemy at this disadvantage, is what makes a successful general."</p>
<p>These words of Teutiaplus failing to move Alcidas, some of the Ionian
exiles and the Lesbians with the expedition began to urge him, since this
seemed too dangerous, to seize one of the Ionian cities or the Aeolic town
of Cyme, to use as a base for effecting the revolt of Ionia. This was by
no means a hopeless enterprise, as their coming was welcome everywhere;
their object would be by this move to deprive Athens of her chief source
of revenue, and at the same time to saddle her with expense, if she chose
to blockade them; and they would probably induce Pissuthnes to join them
in the war. However, Alcidas gave this proposal as bad a reception as the
other, being eager, since he had come too late for Mitylene, to find
himself back in Peloponnese as soon as possible.</p>
<p>Accordingly he put out from Embatum and proceeded along shore; and
touching at the Teian town, Myonnesus, there butchered most of the
prisoners that he had taken on his passage. Upon his coming to anchor at
Ephesus, envoys came to him from the Samians at Anaia, and told him that
he was not going the right way to free Hellas in massacring men who had
never raised a hand against him, and who were not enemies of his, but
allies of Athens against their will, and that if he did not stop he would
turn many more friends into enemies than enemies into friends. Alcidas
agreed to this, and let go all the Chians still in his hands and some of
the others that he had taken; the inhabitants, instead of flying at the
sight of his vessels, rather coming up to them, taking them for Athenian,
having no sort of expectation that while the Athenians commanded the sea
Peloponnesian ships would venture over to Ionia.</p>
<p>From Ephesus Alcidas set sail in haste and fled. He had been seen by the
Salaminian and Paralian galleys, which happened to be sailing from Athens,
while still at anchor off Clarus; and fearing pursuit he now made across
the open sea, fully determined to touch nowhere, if he could help it,
until he got to Peloponnese. Meanwhile news of him had come in to Paches
from the Erythraeid, and indeed from all quarters. As Ionia was
unfortified, great fears were felt that the Peloponnesians coasting along
shore, even if they did not intend to stay, might make descents in passing
and plunder the towns; and now the Paralian and Salaminian, having seen
him at Clarus, themselves brought intelligence of the fact. Paches
accordingly gave hot chase, and continued the pursuit as far as the isle
of Patmos, and then finding that Alcidas had got on too far to be
overtaken, came back again. Meanwhile he thought it fortunate that, as he
had not fallen in with them out at sea, he had not overtaken them anywhere
where they would have been forced to encamp, and so give him the trouble
of blockading them.</p>
<p>On his return along shore he touched, among other places, at Notium, the
port of Colophon, where the Colophonians had settled after the capture of
the upper town by Itamenes and the barbarians, who had been called in by
certain individuals in a party quarrel. The capture of the town took place
about the time of the second Peloponnesian invasion of Attica. However,
the refugees, after settling at Notium, again split up into factions, one
of which called in Arcadian and barbarian mercenaries from Pissuthnes and,
entrenching these in a quarter apart, formed a new community with the
Median party of the Colophonians who joined them from the upper town.
Their opponents had retired into exile, and now called in Paches, who
invited Hippias, the commander of the Arcadians in the fortified quarter,
to a parley, upon condition that, if they could not agree, he was to be
put back safe and sound in the fortification. However, upon his coming out
to him, he put him into custody, though not in chains, and attacked
suddenly and took by surprise the fortification, and putting the Arcadians
and the barbarians found in it to the sword, afterwards took Hippias into
it as he had promised, and, as soon as he was inside, seized him and shot
him down. Paches then gave up Notium to the Colophonians not of the Median
party; and settlers were afterwards sent out from Athens, and the place
colonized according to Athenian laws, after collecting all the
Colophonians found in any of the cities.</p>
<p>Arrived at Mitylene, Paches reduced Pyrrha and Eresus; and finding the
Lacedaemonian, Salaethus, in hiding in the town, sent him off to Athens,
together with the Mitylenians that he had placed in Tenedos, and any other
persons that he thought concerned in the revolt. He also sent back the
greater part of his forces, remaining with the rest to settle Mitylene and
the rest of Lesbos as he thought best.</p>
<p>Upon the arrival of the prisoners with Salaethus, the Athenians at once
put the latter to death, although he offered, among other things, to
procure the withdrawal of the Peloponnesians from Plataea, which was still
under siege; and after deliberating as to what they should do with the
former, in the fury of the moment determined to put to death not only the
prisoners at Athens, but the whole adult male population of Mitylene, and
to make slaves of the women and children. It was remarked that Mitylene
had revolted without being, like the rest, subjected to the empire; and
what above all swelled the wrath of the Athenians was the fact of the
Peloponnesian fleet having ventured over to Ionia to her support, a fact
which was held to argue a long meditated rebellion. They accordingly sent
a galley to communicate the decree to Paches, commanding him to lose no
time in dispatching the Mitylenians. The morrow brought repentance with it
and reflection on the horrid cruelty of a decree, which condemned a whole
city to the fate merited only by the guilty. This was no sooner perceived
by the Mitylenian ambassadors at Athens and their Athenian supporters,
than they moved the authorities to put the question again to the vote;
which they the more easily consented to do, as they themselves plainly saw
that most of the citizens wished some one to give them an opportunity for
reconsidering the matter. An assembly was therefore at once called, and
after much expression of opinion upon both sides, Cleon, son of
Cleaenetus, the same who had carried the former motion of putting the
Mitylenians to death, the most violent man at Athens, and at that time by
far the most powerful with the commons, came forward again and spoke as
follows:</p>
<p>"I have often before now been convinced that a democracy is incapable of
empire, and never more so than by your present change of mind in the
matter of Mitylene. Fears or plots being unknown to you in your daily
relations with each other, you feel just the same with regard to your
allies, and never reflect that the mistakes into which you may be led by
listening to their appeals, or by giving way to your own compassion, are
full of danger to yourselves, and bring you no thanks for your weakness
from your allies; entirely forgetting that your empire is a despotism and
your subjects disaffected conspirators, whose obedience is ensured not by
your suicidal concessions, but by the superiority given you by your own
strength and not their loyalty. The most alarming feature in the case is
the constant change of measures with which we appear to be threatened, and
our seeming ignorance of the fact that bad laws which are never changed
are better for a city than good ones that have no authority; that
unlearned loyalty is more serviceable than quick-witted insubordination;
and that ordinary men usually manage public affairs better than their more
gifted fellows. The latter are always wanting to appear wiser than the
laws, and to overrule every proposition brought forward, thinking that
they cannot show their wit in more important matters, and by such
behaviour too often ruin their country; while those who mistrust their own
cleverness are content to be less learned than the laws, and less able to
pick holes in the speech of a good speaker; and being fair judges rather
than rival athletes, generally conduct affairs successfully. These we
ought to imitate, instead of being led on by cleverness and intellectual
rivalry to advise your people against our real opinions.</p>
<p>"For myself, I adhere to my former opinion, and wonder at those who have
proposed to reopen the case of the Mitylenians, and who are thus causing a
delay which is all in favour of the guilty, by making the sufferer proceed
against the offender with the edge of his anger blunted; although where
vengeance follows most closely upon the wrong, it best equals it and most
amply requites it. I wonder also who will be the man who will maintain the
contrary, and will pretend to show that the crimes of the Mitylenians are
of service to us, and our misfortunes injurious to the allies. Such a man
must plainly either have such confidence in his rhetoric as to adventure
to prove that what has been once for all decided is still undetermined, or
be bribed to try to delude us by elaborate sophisms. In such contests the
state gives the rewards to others, and takes the dangers for herself. The
persons to blame are you who are so foolish as to institute these
contests; who go to see an oration as you would to see a sight, take your
facts on hearsay, judge of the practicability of a project by the wit of
its advocates, and trust for the truth as to past events not to the fact
which you saw more than to the clever strictures which you heard; the easy
victims of new-fangled arguments, unwilling to follow received
conclusions; slaves to every new paradox, despisers of the commonplace;
the first wish of every man being that he could speak himself, the next to
rival those who can speak by seeming to be quite up with their ideas by
applauding every hit almost before it is made, and by being as quick in
catching an argument as you are slow in foreseeing its consequences;
asking, if I may so say, for something different from the conditions under
which we live, and yet comprehending inadequately those very conditions;
very slaves to the pleasure of the ear, and more like the audience of a
rhetorician than the council of a city.</p>
<p>"In order to keep you from this, I proceed to show that no one state has
ever injured you as much as Mitylene. I can make allowance for those who
revolt because they cannot bear our empire, or who have been forced to do
so by the enemy. But for those who possessed an island with
fortifications; who could fear our enemies only by sea, and there had
their own force of galleys to protect them; who were independent and held
in the highest honour by you—to act as these have done, this is not
revolt—revolt implies oppression; it is deliberate and wanton
aggression; an attempt to ruin us by siding with our bitterest enemies; a
worse offence than a war undertaken on their own account in the
acquisition of power. The fate of those of their neighbours who had
already rebelled and had been subdued was no lesson to them; their own
prosperity could not dissuade them from affronting danger; but blindly
confident in the future, and full of hopes beyond their power though not
beyond their ambition, they declared war and made their decision to prefer
might to right, their attack being determined not by provocation but by
the moment which seemed propitious. The truth is that great good fortune
coming suddenly and unexpectedly tends to make a people insolent; in most
cases it is safer for mankind to have success in reason than out of
reason; and it is easier for them, one may say, to stave off adversity
than to preserve prosperity. Our mistake has been to distinguish the
Mitylenians as we have done: had they been long ago treated like the rest,
they never would have so far forgotten themselves, human nature being as
surely made arrogant by consideration as it is awed by firmness. Let them
now therefore be punished as their crime requires, and do not, while you
condemn the aristocracy, absolve the people. This is certain, that all
attacked you without distinction, although they might have come over to us
and been now again in possession of their city. But no, they thought it
safer to throw in their lot with the aristocracy and so joined their
rebellion! Consider therefore: if you subject to the same punishment the
ally who is forced to rebel by the enemy, and him who does so by his own
free choice, which of them, think you, is there that will not rebel upon
the slightest pretext; when the reward of success is freedom, and the
penalty of failure nothing so very terrible? We meanwhile shall have to
risk our money and our lives against one state after another; and if
successful, shall receive a ruined town from which we can no longer draw
the revenue upon which our strength depends; while if unsuccessful, we
shall have an enemy the more upon our hands, and shall spend the time that
might be employed in combating our existing foes in warring with our own
allies.</p>
<p>"No hope, therefore, that rhetoric may instil or money purchase, of the
mercy due to human infirmity must be held out to the Mitylenians. Their
offence was not involuntary, but of malice and deliberate; and mercy is
only for unwilling offenders. I therefore, now as before, persist against
your reversing your first decision, or giving way to the three failings
most fatal to empire—pity, sentiment, and indulgence. Compassion is
due to those who can reciprocate the feeling, not to those who will never
pity us in return, but are our natural and necessary foes: the orators who
charm us with sentiment may find other less important arenas for their
talents, in the place of one where the city pays a heavy penalty for a
momentary pleasure, themselves receiving fine acknowledgments for their
fine phrases; while indulgence should be shown towards those who will be
our friends in future, instead of towards men who will remain just what
they were, and as much our enemies as before. To sum up shortly, I say
that if you follow my advice you will do what is just towards the
Mitylenians, and at the same time expedient; while by a different decision
you will not oblige them so much as pass sentence upon yourselves. For if
they were right in rebelling, you must be wrong in ruling. However, if,
right or wrong, you determine to rule, you must carry out your principle
and punish the Mitylenians as your interest requires; or else you must
give up your empire and cultivate honesty without danger. Make up your
minds, therefore, to give them like for like; and do not let the victims
who escaped the plot be more insensible than the conspirators who hatched
it; but reflect what they would have done if victorious over you,
especially they were the aggressors. It is they who wrong their neighbour
without a cause, that pursue their victim to the death, on account of the
danger which they foresee in letting their enemy survive; since the object
of a wanton wrong is more dangerous, if he escape, than an enemy who has
not this to complain of. Do not, therefore, be traitors to yourselves, but
recall as nearly as possible the moment of suffering and the supreme
importance which you then attached to their reduction; and now pay them
back in their turn, without yielding to present weakness or forgetting the
peril that once hung over you. Punish them as they deserve, and teach your
other allies by a striking example that the penalty of rebellion is death.
Let them once understand this and you will not have so often to neglect
your enemies while you are fighting with your own confederates."</p>
<p>Such were the words of Cleon. After him Diodotus, son of Eucrates, who had
also in the previous assembly spoken most strongly against putting the
Mitylenians to death, came forward and spoke as follows:</p>
<p>"I do not blame the persons who have reopened the case of the Mitylenians,
nor do I approve the protests which we have heard against important
questions being frequently debated. I think the two things most opposed to
good counsel are haste and passion; haste usually goes hand in hand with
folly, passion with coarseness and narrowness of mind. As for the argument
that speech ought not to be the exponent of action, the man who uses it
must be either senseless or interested: senseless if he believes it
possible to treat of the uncertain future through any other medium;
interested if, wishing to carry a disgraceful measure and doubting his
ability to speak well in a bad cause, he thinks to frighten opponents and
hearers by well-aimed calumny. What is still more intolerable is to accuse
a speaker of making a display in order to be paid for it. If ignorance
only were imputed, an unsuccessful speaker might retire with a reputation
for honesty, if not for wisdom; while the charge of dishonesty makes him
suspected, if successful, and thought, if defeated, not only a fool but a
rogue. The city is no gainer by such a system, since fear deprives it of
its advisers; although in truth, if our speakers are to make such
assertions, it would be better for the country if they could not speak at
all, as we should then make fewer blunders. The good citizen ought to
triumph not by frightening his opponents but by beating them fairly in
argument; and a wise city, without over-distinguishing its best advisers,
will nevertheless not deprive them of their due, and, far from punishing
an unlucky counsellor, will not even regard him as disgraced. In this way
successful orators would be least tempted to sacrifice their convictions
to popularity, in the hope of still higher honours, and unsuccessful
speakers to resort to the same popular arts in order to win over the
multitude.</p>
<p>"This is not our way; and, besides, the moment that a man is suspected of
giving advice, however good, from corrupt motives, we feel such a grudge
against him for the gain which after all we are not certain he will
receive, that we deprive the city of its certain benefit. Plain good
advice has thus come to be no less suspected than bad; and the advocate of
the most monstrous measures is not more obliged to use deceit to gain the
people, than the best counsellor is to lie in order to be believed. The
city and the city only, owing to these refinements, can never be served
openly and without disguise; he who does serve it openly being always
suspected of serving himself in some secret way in return. Still,
considering the magnitude of the interests involved, and the position of
affairs, we orators must make it our business to look a little farther
than you who judge offhand; especially as we, your advisers, are
responsible, while you, our audience, are not so. For if those who gave
the advice, and those who took it, suffered equally, you would judge more
calmly; as it is, you visit the disasters into which the whim of the
moment may have led you upon the single person of your adviser, not upon
yourselves, his numerous companions in error.</p>
<p>"However, I have not come forward either to oppose or to accuse in the
matter of Mitylene; indeed, the question before us as sensible men is not
their guilt, but our interests. Though I prove them ever so guilty, I
shall not, therefore, advise their death, unless it be expedient; nor
though they should have claims to indulgence, shall I recommend it, unless
it be dearly for the good of the country. I consider that we are
deliberating for the future more than for the present; and where Cleon is
so positive as to the useful deterrent effects that will follow from
making rebellion capital, I, who consider the interests of the future
quite as much as he, as positively maintain the contrary. And I require
you not to reject my useful considerations for his specious ones: his
speech may have the attraction of seeming the more just in your present
temper against Mitylene; but we are not in a court of justice, but in a
political assembly; and the question is not justice, but how to make the
Mitylenians useful to Athens.</p>
<p>"Now of course communities have enacted the penalty of death for many
offences far lighter than this: still hope leads men to venture, and no
one ever yet put himself in peril without the inward conviction that he
would succeed in his design. Again, was there ever city rebelling that did
not believe that it possessed either in itself or in its alliances
resources adequate to the enterprise? All, states and individuals, are
alike prone to err, and there is no law that will prevent them; or why
should men have exhausted the list of punishments in search of enactments
to protect them from evildoers? It is probable that in early times the
penalties for the greatest offences were less severe, and that, as these
were disregarded, the penalty of death has been by degrees in most cases
arrived at, which is itself disregarded in like manner. Either then some
means of terror more terrible than this must be discovered, or it must be
owned that this restraint is useless; and that as long as poverty gives
men the courage of necessity, or plenty fills them with the ambition which
belongs to insolence and pride, and the other conditions of life remain
each under the thraldom of some fatal and master passion, so long will the
impulse never be wanting to drive men into danger. Hope also and cupidity,
the one leading and the other following, the one conceiving the attempt,
the other suggesting the facility of succeeding, cause the widest ruin,
and, although invisible agents, are far stronger than the dangers that are
seen. Fortune, too, powerfully helps the delusion and, by the unexpected
aid that she sometimes lends, tempts men to venture with inferior means;
and this is especially the case with communities, because the stakes
played for are the highest, freedom or empire, and, when all are acting
together, each man irrationally magnifies his own capacity. In fine, it is
impossible to prevent, and only great simplicity can hope to prevent,
human nature doing what it has once set its mind upon, by force of law or
by any other deterrent force whatsoever.</p>
<p>"We must not, therefore, commit ourselves to a false policy through a
belief in the efficacy of the punishment of death, or exclude rebels from
the hope of repentance and an early atonement of their error. Consider a
moment. At present, if a city that has already revolted perceive that it
cannot succeed, it will come to terms while it is still able to refund
expenses, and pay tribute afterwards. In the other case, what city, think
you, would not prepare better than is now done, and hold out to the last
against its besiegers, if it is all one whether it surrender late or soon?
And how can it be otherwise than hurtful to us to be put to the expense of
a siege, because surrender is out of the question; and if we take the
city, to receive a ruined town from which we can no longer draw the
revenue which forms our real strength against the enemy? We must not,
therefore, sit as strict judges of the offenders to our own prejudice, but
rather see how by moderate chastisements we may be enabled to benefit in
future by the revenue-producing powers of our dependencies; and we must
make up our minds to look for our protection not to legal terrors but to
careful administration. At present we do exactly the opposite. When a free
community, held in subjection by force, rises, as is only natural, and
asserts its independence, it is no sooner reduced than we fancy ourselves
obliged to punish it severely; although the right course with freemen is
not to chastise them rigorously when they do rise, but rigorously to watch
them before they rise, and to prevent their ever entertaining the idea,
and, the insurrection suppressed, to make as few responsible for it as
possible.</p>
<p>"Only consider what a blunder you would commit in doing as Cleon
recommends. As things are at present, in all the cities the people is your
friend, and either does not revolt with the oligarchy, or, if forced to do
so, becomes at once the enemy of the insurgents; so that in the war with
the hostile city you have the masses on your side. But if you butcher the
people of Mitylene, who had nothing to do with the revolt, and who, as
soon as they got arms, of their own motion surrendered the town, first you
will commit the crime of killing your benefactors; and next you will play
directly into the hands of the higher classes, who when they induce their
cities to rise, will immediately have the people on their side, through
your having announced in advance the same punishment for those who are
guilty and for those who are not. On the contrary, even if they were
guilty, you ought to seem not to notice it, in order to avoid alienating
the only class still friendly to us. In short, I consider it far more
useful for the preservation of our empire voluntarily to put up with
injustice, than to put to death, however justly, those whom it is our
interest to keep alive. As for Cleon's idea that in punishment the claims
of justice and expediency can both be satisfied, facts do not confirm the
possibility of such a combination.</p>
<p>"Confess, therefore, that this is the wisest course, and without conceding
too much either to pity or to indulgence, by neither of which motives do I
any more than Cleon wish you to be influenced, upon the plain merits of
the case before you, be persuaded by me to try calmly those of the
Mitylenians whom Paches sent off as guilty, and to leave the rest
undisturbed. This is at once best for the future, and most terrible to
your enemies at the present moment; inasmuch as good policy against an
adversary is superior to the blind attacks of brute force."</p>
<p>Such were the words of Diodotus. The two opinions thus expressed were the
ones that most directly contradicted each other; and the Athenians,
notwithstanding their change of feeling, now proceeded to a division, in
which the show of hands was almost equal, although the motion of Diodotus
carried the day. Another galley was at once sent off in haste, for fear
that the first might reach Lesbos in the interval, and the city be found
destroyed; the first ship having about a day and a night's start. Wine and
barley-cakes were provided for the vessel by the Mitylenian ambassadors,
and great promises made if they arrived in time; which caused the men to
use such diligence upon the voyage that they took their meals of
barley-cakes kneaded with oil and wine as they rowed, and only slept by
turns while the others were at the oar. Luckily they met with no contrary
wind, and the first ship making no haste upon so horrid an errand, while
the second pressed on in the manner described, the first arrived so little
before them, that Paches had only just had time to read the decree, and to
prepare to execute the sentence, when the second put into port and
prevented the massacre. The danger of Mitylene had indeed been great.</p>
<p>The other party whom Paches had sent off as the prime movers in the
rebellion, were upon Cleon's motion put to death by the Athenians, the
number being rather more than a thousand. The Athenians also demolished
the walls of the Mitylenians, and took possession of their ships.
Afterwards tribute was not imposed upon the Lesbians; but all their land,
except that of the Methymnians, was divided into three thousand
allotments, three hundred of which were reserved as sacred for the gods,
and the rest assigned by lot to Athenian shareholders, who were sent out
to the island. With these the Lesbians agreed to pay a rent of two minae a
year for each allotment, and cultivated the land themselves. The Athenians
also took possession of the towns on the continent belonging to the
Mitylenians, which thus became for the future subject to Athens. Such were
the events that took place at Lesbos.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />