<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0010" id="link2HCH0010"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER X </h2>
<p><i>Fifth Year of the War—Trial and Execution of the Plataeans—
Corcyraean Revolution</i></p>
<p>During the same summer, after the reduction of Lesbos, the Athenians under
Nicias, son of Niceratus, made an expedition against the island of Minoa,
which lies off Megara and was used as a fortified post by the Megarians,
who had built a tower upon it. Nicias wished to enable the Athenians to
maintain their blockade from this nearer station instead of from Budorum
and Salamis; to stop the Peloponnesian galleys and privateers sailing out
unobserved from the island, as they had been in the habit of doing; and at
the same time prevent anything from coming into Megara. Accordingly, after
taking two towers projecting on the side of Nisaea, by engines from the
sea, and clearing the entrance into the channel between the island and the
shore, he next proceeded to cut off all communication by building a wall
on the mainland at the point where a bridge across a morass enabled
succours to be thrown into the island, which was not far off from the
continent. A few days sufficing to accomplish this, he afterwards raised
some works in the island also, and leaving a garrison there, departed with
his forces.</p>
<p>About the same time in this summer, the Plataeans, being now without
provisions and unable to support the siege, surrendered to the
Peloponnesians in the following manner. An assault had been made upon the
wall, which the Plataeans were unable to repel. The Lacedaemonian
commander, perceiving their weakness, wished to avoid taking the place by
storm; his instructions from Lacedaemon having been so conceived, in order
that if at any future time peace should be made with Athens, and they
should agree each to restore the places that they had taken in the war,
Plataea might be held to have come over voluntarily, and not be included
in the list. He accordingly sent a herald to them to ask if they were
willing voluntarily to surrender the town to the Lacedaemonians, and
accept them as their judges, upon the understanding that the guilty should
be punished, but no one without form of law. The Plataeans were now in the
last state of weakness, and the herald had no sooner delivered his message
than they surrendered the town. The Peloponnesians fed them for some days
until the judges from Lacedaemon, who were five in number, arrived. Upon
their arrival no charge was preferred; they simply called up the
Plataeans, and asked them whether they had done the Lacedaemonians and
allies any service in the war then raging. The Plataeans asked leave to
speak at greater length, and deputed two of their number to represent
them: Astymachus, son of Asopolaus, and Lacon, son of Aeimnestus, proxenus
of the Lacedaemonians, who came forward and spoke as follows:</p>
<p>"Lacedaemonians, when we surrendered our city we trusted in you, and
looked forward to a trial more agreeable to the forms of law than the
present, to which we had no idea of being subjected; the judges also in
whose hands we consented to place ourselves were you, and you only (from
whom we thought we were most likely to obtain justice), and not other
persons, as is now the case. As matters stand, we are afraid that we have
been doubly deceived. We have good reason to suspect, not only that the
issue to be tried is the most terrible of all, but that you will not prove
impartial; if we may argue from the fact that no accusation was first
brought forward for us to answer, but we had ourselves to ask leave to
speak, and from the question being put so shortly, that a true answer to
it tells against us, while a false one can be contradicted. In this
dilemma, our safest, and indeed our only course, seems to be to say
something at all risks: placed as we are, we could scarcely be silent
without being tormented by the damning thought that speaking might have
saved us. Another difficulty that we have to encounter is the difficulty
of convincing you. Were we unknown to each other we might profit by
bringing forward new matter with which you were unacquainted: as it is, we
can tell you nothing that you do not know already, and we fear, not that
you have condemned us in your own minds of having failed in our duty
towards you, and make this our crime, but that to please a third party we
have to submit to a trial the result of which is already decided.
Nevertheless, we will place before you what we can justly urge, not only
on the question of the quarrel which the Thebans have against us, but also
as addressing you and the rest of the Hellenes; and we will remind you of
our good services, and endeavour to prevail with you.</p>
<p>"To your short question, whether we have done the Lacedaemonians and
allies any service in this war, we say, if you ask us as enemies, that to
refrain from serving you was not to do you injury; if as friends, that you
are more in fault for having marched against us. During the peace, and
against the Mede, we acted well: we have not now been the first to break
the peace, and we were the only Boeotians who then joined in defending
against the Mede the liberty of Hellas. Although an inland people, we were
present at the action at Artemisium; in the battle that took place in our
territory we fought by the side of yourselves and Pausanias; and in all
the other Hellenic exploits of the time we took a part quite out of
proportion to our strength. Besides, you, as Lacedaemonians, ought not to
forget that at the time of the great panic at Sparta, after the
earthquake, caused by the secession of the Helots to Ithome, we sent the
third part of our citizens to assist you.</p>
<p>"On these great and historical occasions such was the part that we chose,
although afterwards we became your enemies. For this you were to blame.
When we asked for your alliance against our Theban oppressors, you
rejected our petition, and told us to go to the Athenians who were our
neighbours, as you lived too far off. In the war we never have done to
you, and never should have done to you, anything unreasonable. If we
refused to desert the Athenians when you asked us, we did no wrong; they
had helped us against the Thebans when you drew back, and we could no
longer give them up with honour; especially as we had obtained their
alliance and had been admitted to their citizenship at our own request,
and after receiving benefits at their hands; but it was plainly our duty
loyally to obey their orders. Besides, the faults that either of you may
commit in your supremacy must be laid, not upon the followers, but on the
chiefs that lead them astray.</p>
<p>"With regard to the Thebans, they have wronged us repeatedly, and their
last aggression, which has been the means of bringing us into our present
position, is within your own knowledge. In seizing our city in time of
peace, and what is more at a holy time in the month, they justly
encountered our vengeance, in accordance with the universal law which
sanctions resistance to an invader; and it cannot now be right that we
should suffer on their account. By taking your own immediate interest and
their animosity as the test of justice, you will prove yourselves to be
rather waiters on expediency than judges of right; although if they seem
useful to you now, we and the rest of the Hellenes gave you much more
valuable help at a time of greater need. Now you are the assailants, and
others fear you; but at the crisis to which we allude, when the barbarian
threatened all with slavery, the Thebans were on his side. It is just,
therefore, to put our patriotism then against our error now, if error
there has been; and you will find the merit outweighing the fault, and
displayed at a juncture when there were few Hellenes who would set their
valour against the strength of Xerxes, and when greater praise was theirs
who preferred the dangerous path of honour to the safe course of
consulting their own interest with respect to the invasion. To these few
we belonged, and highly were we honoured for it; and yet we now fear to
perish by having again acted on the same principles, and chosen to act
well with Athens sooner than wisely with Sparta. Yet in justice the same
cases should be decided in the same way, and policy should not mean
anything else than lasting gratitude for the service of good ally combined
with a proper attention to one's own immediate interest.</p>
<p>"Consider also that at present the Hellenes generally regard you as a
pattern of worth and honour; and if you pass an unjust sentence upon us in
this which is no obscure cause, but one in which you, the judges, are as
illustrious as we, the prisoners, are blameless, take care that
displeasure be not felt at an unworthy decision in the matter of
honourable men made by men yet more honourable than they, and at the
consecration in the national temples of spoils taken from the Plataeans,
the benefactors of Hellas. Shocking indeed will it seem for Lacedaemonians
to destroy Plataea, and for the city whose name your fathers inscribed
upon the tripod at Delphi for its good service, to be by you blotted out
from the map of Hellas, to please the Thebans. To such a depth of
misfortune have we fallen that, while the Medes' success had been our
ruin, Thebans now supplant us in your once fond regards; and we have been
subjected to two dangers, the greatest of any—that of dying of
starvation then, if we had not surrendered our town, and now of being
tried for our lives. So that we Plataeans, after exertions beyond our
power in the cause of the Hellenes, are rejected by all, forsaken and
unassisted; helped by none of our allies, and reduced to doubt the
stability of our only hope, yourselves.</p>
<p>"Still, in the name of the gods who once presided over our confederacy,
and of our own good service in the Hellenic cause, we adjure you to
relent; to recall the decision which we fear that the Thebans may have
obtained from you; to ask back the gift that you have given them, that
they disgrace not you by slaying us; to gain a pure instead of a guilty
gratitude, and not to gratify others to be yourselves rewarded with shame.
Our lives may be quickly taken, but it will be a heavy task to wipe away
the infamy of the deed; as we are no enemies whom you might justly punish,
but friends forced into taking arms against you. To grant us our lives
would be, therefore, a righteous judgment; if you consider also that we
are prisoners who surrendered of their own accord, stretching out our
hands for quarter, whose slaughter Hellenic law forbids, and who besides
were always your benefactors. Look at the sepulchres of your fathers,
slain by the Medes and buried in our country, whom year by year we
honoured with garments and all other dues, and the first-fruits of all
that our land produced in their season, as friends from a friendly country
and allies to our old companions in arms. Should you not decide aright,
your conduct would be the very opposite to ours. Consider only: Pausanias
buried them thinking that he was laying them in friendly ground and among
men as friendly; but you, if you kill us and make the Plataean territory
Theban, will leave your fathers and kinsmen in a hostile soil and among
their murderers, deprived of the honours which they now enjoy. What is
more, you will enslave the land in which the freedom of the Hellenes was
won, make desolate the temples of the gods to whom they prayed before they
overcame the Medes, and take away your ancestral sacrifices from those who
founded and instituted them.</p>
<p>"It were not to your glory, Lacedaemonians, either to offend in this way
against the common law of the Hellenes and against your own ancestors, or
to kill us your benefactors to gratify another's hatred without having
been wronged yourselves: it were more so to spare us and to yield to the
impressions of a reasonable compassion; reflecting not merely on the awful
fate in store for us, but also on the character of the sufferers, and on
the impossibility of predicting how soon misfortune may fall even upon
those who deserve it not. We, as we have a right to do and as our need
impels us, entreat you, calling aloud upon the gods at whose common altar
all the Hellenes worship, to hear our request, to be not unmindful of the
oaths which your fathers swore, and which we now plead—we supplicate
you by the tombs of your fathers, and appeal to those that are gone to
save us from falling into the hands of the Thebans and their dearest
friends from being given up to their most detested foes. We also remind
you of that day on which we did the most glorious deeds, by your fathers'
sides, we who now on this are like to suffer the most dreadful fate.
Finally, to do what is necessary and yet most difficult for men in our
situation—that is, to make an end of speaking, since with that
ending the peril of our lives draws near—in conclusion we say that
we did not surrender our city to the Thebans (to that we would have
preferred inglorious starvation), but trusted in and capitulated to you;
and it would be just, if we fail to persuade you, to put us back in the
same position and let us take the chance that falls to us. And at the same
time we adjure you not to give us up—your suppliants,
Lacedaemonians, out of your hands and faith, Plataeans foremost of the
Hellenic patriots, to Thebans, our most hated enemies—but to be our
saviours, and not, while you free the rest of the Hellenes, to bring us to
destruction."</p>
<p>Such were the words of the Plataeans. The Thebans, afraid that the
Lacedaemonians might be moved by what they had heard, came forward and
said that they too desired to address them, since the Plataeans had,
against their wish, been allowed to speak at length instead of being
confined to a simple answer to the question. Leave being granted, the
Thebans spoke as follows:</p>
<p>"We should never have asked to make this speech if the Plataeans on their
side had contented themselves with shortly answering the question, and had
not turned round and made charges against us, coupled with a long defence
of themselves upon matters outside the present inquiry and not even the
subject of accusation, and with praise of what no one finds fault with.
However, since they have done so, we must answer their charges and refute
their self-praise, in order that neither our bad name nor their good may
help them, but that you may hear the real truth on both points, and so
decide.</p>
<p>"The origin of our quarrel was this. We settled Plataea some time after
the rest of Boeotia, together with other places out of which we had driven
the mixed population. The Plataeans not choosing to recognize our
supremacy, as had been first arranged, but separating themselves from the
rest of the Boeotians, and proving traitors to their nationality, we used
compulsion; upon which they went over to the Athenians, and with them did
as much harm, for which we retaliated.</p>
<p>"Next, when the barbarian invaded Hellas, they say that they were the only
Boeotians who did not Medize; and this is where they most glorify
themselves and abuse us. We say that if they did not Medize, it was
because the Athenians did not do so either; just as afterwards when the
Athenians attacked the Hellenes they, the Plataeans, were again the only
Boeotians who Atticized. And yet consider the forms of our respective
governments when we so acted. Our city at that juncture had neither an
oligarchical constitution in which all the nobles enjoyed equal rights,
nor a democracy, but that which is most opposed to law and good government
and nearest a tyranny—the rule of a close cabal. These, hoping to
strengthen their individual power by the success of the Mede, kept down by
force the people, and brought him into the town. The city as a whole was
not its own mistress when it so acted, and ought not to be reproached for
the errors that it committed while deprived of its constitution. Examine
only how we acted after the departure of the Mede and the recovery of the
constitution; when the Athenians attacked the rest of Hellas and
endeavoured to subjugate our country, of the greater part of which faction
had already made them masters. Did not we fight and conquer at Coronea and
liberate Boeotia, and do we not now actively contribute to the liberation
of the rest, providing horses to the cause and a force unequalled by that
of any other state in the confederacy?</p>
<p>"Let this suffice to excuse us for our Medism. We will now endeavour to
show that you have injured the Hellenes more than we, and are more
deserving of condign punishment. It was in defence against us, say you,
that you became allies and citizens of Athens. If so, you ought only to
have called in the Athenians against us, instead of joining them in
attacking others: it was open to you to do this if you ever felt that they
were leading you where you did not wish to follow, as Lacedaemon was
already your ally against the Mede, as you so much insist; and this was
surely sufficient to keep us off, and above all to allow you to deliberate
in security. Nevertheless, of your own choice and without compulsion you
chose to throw your lot in with Athens. And you say that it had been base
for you to betray your benefactors; but it was surely far baser and more
iniquitous to sacrifice the whole body of the Hellenes, your fellow
confederates, who were liberating Hellas, than the Athenians only, who
were enslaving it. The return that you made them was therefore neither
equal nor honourable, since you called them in, as you say, because you
were being oppressed yourselves, and then became their accomplices in
oppressing others; although baseness rather consists in not returning like
for like than in not returning what is justly due but must be unjustly
paid.</p>
<p>"Meanwhile, after thus plainly showing that it was not for the sake of the
Hellenes that you alone then did not Medize, but because the Athenians did
not do so either, and you wished to side with them and to be against the
rest; you now claim the benefit of good deeds done to please your
neighbours. This cannot be admitted: you chose the Athenians, and with
them you must stand or fall. Nor can you plead the league then made and
claim that it should now protect you. You abandoned that league, and
offended against it by helping instead of hindering the subjugation of the
Aeginetans and others of its members, and that not under compulsion, but
while in enjoyment of the same institutions that you enjoy to the present
hour, and no one forcing you as in our case. Lastly, an invitation was
addressed to you before you were blockaded to be neutral and join neither
party: this you did not accept. Who then merit the detestation of the
Hellenes more justly than you, you who sought their ruin under the mask of
honour? The former virtues that you allege you now show not to be proper
to your character; the real bent of your nature has been at length
damningly proved: when the Athenians took the path of injustice you
followed them.</p>
<p>"Of our unwilling Medism and your wilful Atticizing this then is our
explanation. The last wrong wrong of which you complain consists in our
having, as you say, lawlessly invaded your town in time of peace and
festival. Here again we cannot think that we were more in fault than
yourselves. If of our own proper motion we made an armed attack upon your
city and ravaged your territory, we are guilty; but if the first men among
you in estate and family, wishing to put an end to the foreign connection
and to restore you to the common Boeotian country, of their own free will
invited us, wherein is our crime? Where wrong is done, those who lead, as
you say, are more to blame than those who follow. Not that, in our
judgment, wrong was done either by them or by us. Citizens like
yourselves, and with more at stake than you, they opened their own walls
and introduced us into their own city, not as foes but as friends, to
prevent the bad among you from becoming worse; to give honest men their
due; to reform principles without attacking persons, since you were not to
be banished from your city, but brought home to your kindred, nor to be
made enemies to any, but friends alike to all.</p>
<p>"That our intention was not hostile is proved by our behaviour. We did no
harm to any one, but publicly invited those who wished to live under a
national, Boeotian government to come over to us; which as first you
gladly did, and made an agreement with us and remained tranquil, until you
became aware of the smallness of our numbers. Now it is possible that
there may have been something not quite fair in our entering without the
consent of your commons. At any rate you did not repay us in kind. Instead
of refraining, as we had done, from violence, and inducing us to retire by
negotiation, you fell upon us in violation of your agreement, and slew
some of us in fight, of which we do not so much complain, for in that
there was a certain justice; but others who held out their hands and
received quarter, and whose lives you subsequently promised us, you
lawlessly butchered. If this was not abominable, what is? And after these
three crimes committed one after the other—the violation of your
agreement, the murder of the men afterwards, and the lying breach of your
promise not to kill them, if we refrained from injuring your property in
the country—you still affirm that we are the criminals and
yourselves pretend to escape justice. Not so, if these your judges decide
aright, but you will be punished for all together.</p>
<p>"Such, Lacedaemonians, are the facts. We have gone into them at some
length both on your account and on our own, that you may fed that you will
justly condemn the prisoners, and we, that we have given an additional
sanction to our vengeance. We would also prevent you from being melted by
hearing of their past virtues, if any such they had: these may be fairly
appealed to by the victims of injustice, but only aggravate the guilt of
criminals, since they offend against their better nature. Nor let them
gain anything by crying and wailing, by calling upon your fathers' tombs
and their own desolate condition. Against this we point to the far more
dreadful fate of our youth, butchered at their hands; the fathers of whom
either fell at Coronea, bringing Boeotia over to you, or seated, forlorn
old men by desolate hearths, with far more reason implore your justice
upon the prisoners. The pity which they appeal to is rather due to men who
suffer unworthily; those who suffer justly as they do are on the contrary
subjects for triumph. For their present desolate condition they have
themselves to blame, since they wilfully rejected the better alliance.
Their lawless act was not provoked by any action of ours: hate, not
justice, inspired their decision; and even now the satisfaction which they
afford us is not adequate; they will suffer by a legal sentence, not as
they pretend as suppliants asking for quarter in battle, but as prisoners
who have surrendered upon agreement to take their trial. Vindicate,
therefore, Lacedaemonians, the Hellenic law which they have broken; and to
us, the victims of its violation, grant the reward merited by our zeal.
Nor let us be supplanted in your favour by their harangues, but offer an
example to the Hellenes, that the contests to which you invite them are of
deeds, not words: good deeds can be shortly stated, but where wrong is
done a wealth of language is needed to veil its deformity. However, if
leading powers were to do what you are now doing, and putting one short
question to all alike were to decide accordingly, men would be less
tempted to seek fine phrases to cover bad actions."</p>
<p>Such were the words of the Thebans. The Lacedaemonian judges decided that
the question whether they had received any service from the Plataeans in
the war, was a fair one for them to put; as they had always invited them
to be neutral, agreeably to the original covenant of Pausanias after the
defeat of the Mede, and had again definitely offered them the same
conditions before the blockade. This offer having been refused, they were
now, they conceived, by the loyalty of their intention released from their
covenant; and having, as they considered, suffered evil at the hands of
the Plataeans, they brought them in again one by one and asked each of
them the same question, that is to say, whether they had done the
Lacedaemonians and allies any service in the war; and upon their saying
that they had not, took them out and slew them, all without exception. The
number of Plataeans thus massacred was not less than two hundred, with
twenty-five Athenians who had shared in the siege. The women were taken as
slaves. The city the Thebans gave for about a year to some political
emigrants from Megara and to the surviving Plataeans of their own party to
inhabit, and afterwards razed it to the ground from the very foundations,
and built on to the precinct of Hera an inn two hundred feet square, with
rooms all round above and below, making use for this purpose of the roofs
and doors of the Plataeans: of the rest of the materials in the wall, the
brass and the iron, they made couches which they dedicated to Hera, for
whom they also built a stone chapel of a hundred feet square. The land
they confiscated and let out on a ten years' lease to Theban occupiers.
The adverse attitude of the Lacedaemonians in the whole Plataean affair
was mainly adopted to please the Thebans, who were thought to be useful in
the war at that moment raging. Such was the end of Plataea, in the
ninety-third year after she became the ally of Athens.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the forty ships of the Peloponnesians that had gone to the
relief of the Lesbians, and which we left flying across the open sea,
pursued by the Athenians, were caught in a storm off Crete, and scattering
from thence made their way to Peloponnese, where they found at Cyllene
thirteen Leucadian and Ambraciot galleys, with Brasidas, son of Tellis,
lately arrived as counsellor to Alcidas; the Lacedaemonians, upon the
failure of the Lesbian expedition, having resolved to strengthen their
fleet and sail to Corcyra, where a revolution had broken out, so as to
arrive there before the twelve Athenian ships at Naupactus could be
reinforced from Athens. Brasidas and Alcidas began to prepare accordingly.</p>
<p>The Corcyraean revolution began with the return of the prisoners taken in
the sea-fights off Epidamnus. These the Corinthians had released,
nominally upon the security of eight hundred talents given by their
proxeni, but in reality upon their engagement to bring over Corcyra to
Corinth. These men proceeded to canvass each of the citizens, and to
intrigue with the view of detaching the city from Athens. Upon the arrival
of an Athenian and a Corinthian vessel, with envoys on board, a conference
was held in which the Corcyraeans voted to remain allies of the Athenians
according to their agreement, but to be friends of the Peloponnesians as
they had been formerly. Meanwhile, the returned prisoners brought
Peithias, a volunteer proxenus of the Athenians and leader of the commons,
to trial, upon the charge of enslaving Corcyra to Athens. He, being
acquitted, retorted by accusing five of the richest of their number of
cutting stakes in the ground sacred to Zeus and Alcinous; the legal
penalty being a stater for each stake. Upon their conviction, the amount
of the penalty being very large, they seated themselves as suppliants in
the temples to be allowed to pay it by instalments; but Peithias, who was
one of the senate, prevailed upon that body to enforce the law; upon which
the accused, rendered desperate by the law, and also learning that
Peithias had the intention, while still a member of the senate, to
persuade the people to conclude a defensive and offensive alliance with
Athens, banded together armed with daggers, and suddenly bursting into the
senate killed Peithias and sixty others, senators and private persons;
some few only of the party of Peithias taking refuge in the Athenian
galley, which had not yet departed.</p>
<p>After this outrage, the conspirators summoned the Corcyraeans to an
assembly, and said that this would turn out for the best, and would save
them from being enslaved by Athens: for the future, they moved to receive
neither party unless they came peacefully in a single ship, treating any
larger number as enemies. This motion made, they compelled it to be
adopted, and instantly sent off envoys to Athens to justify what had been
done and to dissuade the refugees there from any hostile proceedings which
might lead to a reaction.</p>
<p>Upon the arrival of the embassy, the Athenians arrested the envoys and all
who listened to them, as revolutionists, and lodged them in Aegina.
Meanwhile a Corinthian galley arriving in the island with Lacedaemonian
envoys, the dominant Corcyraean party attacked the commons and defeated
them in battle. Night coming on, the commons took refuge in the Acropolis
and the higher parts of the city, and concentrated themselves there,
having also possession of the Hyllaic harbour; their adversaries occupying
the market-place, where most of them lived, and the harbour adjoining,
looking towards the mainland.</p>
<p>The next day passed in skirmishes of little importance, each party sending
into the country to offer freedom to the slaves and to invite them to join
them. The mass of the slaves answered the appeal of the commons; their
antagonists being reinforced by eight hundred mercenaries from the
continent.</p>
<p>After a day's interval hostilities recommenced, victory remaining with the
commons, who had the advantage in numbers and position, the women also
valiantly assisting them, pelting with tiles from the houses, and
supporting the melee with a fortitude beyond their sex. Towards dusk, the
oligarchs in full rout, fearing that the victorious commons might assault
and carry the arsenal and put them to the sword, fired the houses round
the marketplace and the lodging-houses, in order to bar their advance;
sparing neither their own, nor those of their neighbours; by which much
stuff of the merchants was consumed and the city risked total destruction,
if a wind had come to help the flame by blowing on it. Hostilities now
ceasing, both sides kept quiet, passing the night on guard, while the
Corinthian ship stole out to sea upon the victory of the commons, and most
of the mercenaries passed over secretly to the continent.</p>
<p>The next day the Athenian general, Nicostratus, son of Diitrephes, came up
from Naupactus with twelve ships and five hundred Messenian heavy
infantry. He at once endeavoured to bring about a settlement, and
persuaded the two parties to agree together to bring to trial ten of the
ringleaders, who presently fled, while the rest were to live in peace,
making terms with each other, and entering into a defensive and offensive
alliance with the Athenians. This arranged, he was about to sail away,
when the leaders of the commons induced him to leave them five of his
ships to make their adversaries less disposed to move, while they manned
and sent with him an equal number of their own. He had no sooner
consented, than they began to enroll their enemies for the ships; and
these, fearing that they might be sent off to Athens, seated themselves as
suppliants in the temple of the Dioscuri. An attempt on the part of
Nicostratus to reassure them and to persuade them to rise proving
unsuccessful, the commons armed upon this pretext, alleging the refusal of
their adversaries to sail with them as a proof of the hollowness of their
intentions, and took their arms out of their houses, and would have
dispatched some whom they fell in with, if Nicostratus had not prevented
it. The rest of the party, seeing what was going on, seated themselves as
suppliants in the temple of Hera, being not less than four hundred in
number; until the commons, fearing that they might adopt some desperate
resolution, induced them to rise, and conveyed them over to the island in
front of the temple, where provisions were sent across to them.</p>
<p>At this stage in the revolution, on the fourth or fifth day after the
removal of the men to the island, the Peloponnesian ships arrived from
Cyllene where they had been stationed since their return from Ionia,
fifty-three in number, still under the command of Alcidas, but with
Brasidas also on board as his adviser; and dropping anchor at Sybota, a
harbour on the mainland, at daybreak made sail for Corcyra.</p>
<p>The Corcyraeans in great confusion and alarm at the state of things in the
city and at the approach of the invader, at once proceeded to equip sixty
vessels, which they sent out, as fast as they were manned, against the
enemy, in spite of the Athenians recommending them to let them sail out
first, and to follow themselves afterwards with all their ships together.
Upon their vessels coming up to the enemy in this straggling fashion, two
immediately deserted: in others the crews were fighting among themselves,
and there was no order in anything that was done; so that the
Peloponnesians, seeing their confusion, placed twenty ships to oppose the
Corcyraeans, and ranged the rest against the twelve Athenian ships,
amongst which were the two vessels Salaminia and Paralus.</p>
<p>While the Corcyraeans, attacking without judgment and in small
detachments, were already crippled by their own misconduct, the Athenians,
afraid of the numbers of the enemy and of being surrounded, did not
venture to attack the main body or even the centre of the division opposed
to them, but fell upon its wing and sank one vessel; after which the
Peloponnesians formed in a circle, and the Athenians rowed round them and
tried to throw them into disorder. Perceiving this, the division opposed
to the Corcyraeans, fearing a repetition of the disaster of Naupactus,
came to support their friends, and the whole fleet now bore down, united,
upon the Athenians, who retired before it, backing water, retiring as
leisurely as possible in order to give the Corcyraeans time to escape,
while the enemy was thus kept occupied. Such was the character of this
sea-fight, which lasted until sunset.</p>
<p>The Corcyraeans now feared that the enemy would follow up their victory
and sail against the town and rescue the men in the island, or strike some
other blow equally decisive, and accordingly carried the men over again to
the temple of Hera, and kept guard over the city. The Peloponnesians,
however, although victorious in the sea-fight, did not venture to attack
the town, but took the thirteen Corcyraean vessels which they had
captured, and with them sailed back to the continent from whence they had
put out. The next day equally they refrained from attacking the city,
although the disorder and panic were at their height, and though Brasidas,
it is said, urged Alcidas, his superior officer, to do so, but they landed
upon the promontory of Leukimme and laid waste the country.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the commons in Corcyra, being still in great fear of the fleet
attacking them, came to a parley with the suppliants and their friends, in
order to save the town; and prevailed upon some of them to go on board the
ships, of which they still manned thirty, against the expected attack. But
the Peloponnesians after ravaging the country until midday sailed away,
and towards nightfall were informed by beacon signals of the approach of
sixty Athenian vessels from Leucas, under the command of Eurymedon, son of
Thucles; which had been sent off by the Athenians upon the news of the
revolution and of the fleet with Alcidas being about to sail for Corcyra.</p>
<p>The Peloponnesians accordingly at once set off in haste by night for home,
coasting along shore; and hauling their ships across the Isthmus of
Leucas, in order not to be seen doubling it, so departed. The Corcyraeans,
made aware of the approach of the Athenian fleet and of the departure of
the enemy, brought the Messenians from outside the walls into the town,
and ordered the fleet which they had manned to sail round into the Hyllaic
harbour; and while it was so doing, slew such of their enemies as they
laid hands on, dispatching afterwards, as they landed them, those whom
they had persuaded to go on board the ships. Next they went to the
sanctuary of Hera and persuaded about fifty men to take their trial, and
condemned them all to death. The mass of the suppliants who had refused to
do so, on seeing what was taking place, slew each other there in the
consecrated ground; while some hanged themselves upon the trees, and
others destroyed themselves as they were severally able. During seven days
that Eurymedon stayed with his sixty ships, the Corcyraeans were engaged
in butchering those of their fellow citizens whom they regarded as their
enemies: and although the crime imputed was that of attempting to put down
the democracy, some were slain also for private hatred, others by their
debtors because of the moneys owed to them. Death thus raged in every
shape; and, as usually happens at such times, there was no length to which
violence did not go; sons were killed by their fathers, and suppliants
dragged from the altar or slain upon it; while some were even walled up in
the temple of Dionysus and died there.</p>
<p>So bloody was the march of the revolution, and the impression which it
made was the greater as it was one of the first to occur. Later on, one
may say, the whole Hellenic world was convulsed; struggles being every,
where made by the popular chiefs to bring in the Athenians, and by the
oligarchs to introduce the Lacedaemonians. In peace there would have been
neither the pretext nor the wish to make such an invitation; but in war,
with an alliance always at the command of either faction for the hurt of
their adversaries and their own corresponding advantage, opportunities for
bringing in the foreigner were never wanting to the revolutionary parties.
The sufferings which revolution entailed upon the cities were many and
terrible, such as have occurred and always will occur, as long as the
nature of mankind remains the same; though in a severer or milder form,
and varying in their symptoms, according to the variety of the particular
cases. In peace and prosperity, states and individuals have better
sentiments, because they do not find themselves suddenly confronted with
imperious necessities; but war takes away the easy supply of daily wants,
and so proves a rough master, that brings most men's characters to a level
with their fortunes. Revolution thus ran its course from city to city, and
the places which it arrived at last, from having heard what had been done
before, carried to a still greater excess the refinement of their
inventions, as manifested in the cunning of their enterprises and the
atrocity of their reprisals. Words had to change their ordinary meaning
and to take that which was now given them. Reckless audacity came to be
considered the courage of a loyal ally; prudent hesitation, specious
cowardice; moderation was held to be a cloak for unmanliness; ability to
see all sides of a question, inaptness to act on any. Frantic violence
became the attribute of manliness; cautious plotting, a justifiable means
of self-defence. The advocate of extreme measures was always trustworthy;
his opponent a man to be suspected. To succeed in a plot was to have a
shrewd head, to divine a plot a still shrewder; but to try to provide
against having to do either was to break up your party and to be afraid of
your adversaries. In fine, to forestall an intending criminal, or to
suggest the idea of a crime where it was wanting, was equally commended
until even blood became a weaker tie than party, from the superior
readiness of those united by the latter to dare everything without
reserve; for such associations had not in view the blessings derivable
from established institutions but were formed by ambition for their
overthrow; and the confidence of their members in each other rested less
on any religious sanction than upon complicity in crime. The fair
proposals of an adversary were met with jealous precautions by the
stronger of the two, and not with a generous confidence. Revenge also was
held of more account than self-preservation. Oaths of reconciliation,
being only proffered on either side to meet an immediate difficulty, only
held good so long as no other weapon was at hand; but when opportunity
offered, he who first ventured to seize it and to take his enemy off his
guard, thought this perfidious vengeance sweeter than an open one, since,
considerations of safety apart, success by treachery won him the palm of
superior intelligence. Indeed it is generally the case that men are
readier to call rogues clever than simpletons honest, and are as ashamed
of being the second as they are proud of being the first. The cause of all
these evils was the lust for power arising from greed and ambition; and
from these passions proceeded the violence of parties once engaged in
contention. The leaders in the cities, each provided with the fairest
professions, on the one side with the cry of political equality of the
people, on the other of a moderate aristocracy, sought prizes for
themselves in those public interests which they pretended to cherish, and,
recoiling from no means in their struggles for ascendancy engaged in the
direst excesses; in their acts of vengeance they went to even greater
lengths, not stopping at what justice or the good of the state demanded,
but making the party caprice of the moment their only standard, and
invoking with equal readiness the condemnation of an unjust verdict or the
authority of the strong arm to glut the animosities of the hour. Thus
religion was in honour with neither party; but the use of fair phrases to
arrive at guilty ends was in high reputation. Meanwhile the moderate part
of the citizens perished between the two, either for not joining in the
quarrel, or because envy would not suffer them to escape.</p>
<p>Thus every form of iniquity took root in the Hellenic countries by reason
of the troubles. The ancient simplicity into which honour so largely
entered was laughed down and disappeared; and society became divided into
camps in which no man trusted his fellow. To put an end to this, there was
neither promise to be depended upon, nor oath that could command respect;
but all parties dwelling rather in their calculation upon the hopelessness
of a permanent state of things, were more intent upon self-defence than
capable of confidence. In this contest the blunter wits were most
successful. Apprehensive of their own deficiencies and of the cleverness
of their antagonists, they feared to be worsted in debate and to be
surprised by the combinations of their more versatile opponents, and so at
once boldly had recourse to action: while their adversaries, arrogantly
thinking that they should know in time, and that it was unnecessary to
secure by action what policy afforded, often fell victims to their want of
precaution.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Corcyra gave the first example of most of the crimes alluded to;
of the reprisals exacted by the governed who had never experienced
equitable treatment or indeed aught but insolence from their rulers—when
their hour came; of the iniquitous resolves of those who desired to get
rid of their accustomed poverty, and ardently coveted their neighbours'
goods; and lastly, of the savage and pitiless excesses into which men who
had begun the struggle, not in a class but in a party spirit, were hurried
by their ungovernable passions. In the confusion into which life was now
thrown in the cities, human nature, always rebelling against the law and
now its master, gladly showed itself ungoverned in passion, above respect
for justice, and the enemy of all superiority; since revenge would not
have been set above religion, and gain above justice, had it not been for
the fatal power of envy. Indeed men too often take upon themselves in the
prosecution of their revenge to set the example of doing away with those
general laws to which all alike can look for salvation in adversity,
instead of allowing them to subsist against the day of danger when their
aid may be required.</p>
<p>While the revolutionary passions thus for the first time displayed
themselves in the factions of Corcyra, Eurymedon and the Athenian fleet
sailed away; after which some five hundred Corcyraean exiles who had
succeeded in escaping, took some forts on the mainland, and becoming
masters of the Corcyraean territory over the water, made this their base
to Plunder their countrymen in the island, and did so much damage as to
cause a severe famine in the town. They also sent envoys to Lacedaemon and
Corinth to negotiate their restoration; but meeting with no success,
afterwards got together boats and mercenaries and crossed over to the
island, being about six hundred in all; and burning their boats so as to
have no hope except in becoming masters of the country, went up to Mount
Istone, and fortifying themselves there, began to annoy those in the city
and obtained command of the country.</p>
<p>At the close of the same summer the Athenians sent twenty ships under the
command of Laches, son of Melanopus, and Charoeades, son of Euphiletus, to
Sicily, where the Syracusans and Leontines were at war. The Syracusans had
for allies all the Dorian cities except Camarina—these had been
included in the Lacedaemonian confederacy from the commencement of the
war, though they had not taken any active part in it—the Leontines
had Camarina and the Chalcidian cities. In Italy the Locrians were for the
Syracusans, the Rhegians for their Leontine kinsmen. The allies of the
Leontines now sent to Athens and appealed to their ancient alliance and to
their Ionian origin, to persuade the Athenians to send them a fleet, as
the Syracusans were blockading them by land and sea. The Athenians sent it
upon the plea of their common descent, but in reality to prevent the
exportation of Sicilian corn to Peloponnese and to test the possibility of
bringing Sicily into subjection. Accordingly they established themselves
at Rhegium in Italy, and from thence carried on the war in concert with
their allies.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />