<h2> <SPAN name="ch61" id="ch61"></SPAN>CHAPTER LXI. </h2>
<p>In this place I will print an article which I wrote for the New York
Herald the night we arrived. I do it partly because my contract with my
publishers makes it compulsory; partly because it is a proper, tolerably
accurate, and exhaustive summing up of the cruise of the ship and the
performances of the pilgrims in foreign lands; and partly because some of
the passengers have abused me for writing it, and I wish the public to see
how thankless a task it is to put one's self to trouble to glorify
unappreciative people. I was charged with "rushing into print" with these
compliments. I did not rush. I had written news letters to the Herald
sometimes, but yet when I visited the office that day I did not say any
thing about writing a valedictory. I did go to the Tribune office to see
if such an article was wanted, because I belonged on the regular staff of
that paper and it was simply a duty to do it. The managing editor was
absent, and so I thought no more about it. At night when the Herald's
request came for an article, I did not "rush." In fact, I demurred for a
while, because I did not feel like writing compliments then, and therefore
was afraid to speak of the cruise lest I might be betrayed into using
other than complimentary language. However, I reflected that it would be a
just and righteous thing to go down and write a kind word for the Hadjis—Hadjis
are people who have made the pilgrimage—because parties not
interested could not do it so feelingly as I, a fellow-Hadji, and so I
penned the valedictory. I have read it, and read it again; and if there is
a sentence in it that is not fulsomely complimentary to captain, ship and
passengers, I can not find it. If it is not a chapter that any company
might be proud to have a body write about them, my judgment is fit for
nothing. With these remarks I confidently submit it to the unprejudiced
judgment of the reader:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>RETURN OF THE HOLY LAND EXCURSIONISTS—THE STORY OF THE CRUISE.</p>
<p>TO THE EDITOR OF THE HERALD:</p>
<p>The steamer Quaker City has accomplished at last her extraordinary
voyage and returned to her old pier at the foot of Wall street. The
expedition was a success in some respects, in some it was not.
Originally it was advertised as a "pleasure excursion." Well, perhaps,
it was a pleasure excursion, but certainly it did not look like one;
certainly it did not act like one. Any body's and every body's notion of
a pleasure excursion is that the parties to it will of a necessity be
young and giddy and somewhat boisterous. They will dance a good deal,
sing a good deal, make love, but sermonize very little. Any body's and
every body's notion of a well conducted funeral is that there must be a
hearse and a corpse, and chief mourners and mourners by courtesy, many
old people, much solemnity, no levity, and a prayer and a sermon withal.
Three-fourths of the Quaker City's passengers were between forty and
seventy years of age! There was a picnic crowd for you! It may be
supposed that the other fourth was composed of young girls. But it was
not. It was chiefly composed of rusty old bachelors and a child of six
years. Let us average the ages of the Quaker City's pilgrims and set the
figure down as fifty years. Is any man insane enough to imagine that
this picnic of patriarchs sang, made love, danced, laughed, told
anecdotes, dealt in ungodly levity? In my experience they sinned little
in these matters. No doubt it was presumed here at home that these
frolicsome veterans laughed and sang and romped all day, and day after
day, and kept up a noisy excitement from one end of the ship to the
other; and that they played blind-man's buff or danced quadrilles and
waltzes on moonlight evenings on the quarter-deck; and that at odd
moments of unoccupied time they jotted a laconic item or two in the
journals they opened on such an elaborate plan when they left home, and
then skurried off to their whist and euchre labors under the cabin
lamps. If these things were presumed, the presumption was at fault. The
venerable excursionists were not gay and frisky. They played no
blind-man's buff; they dealt not in whist; they shirked not the irksome
journal, for alas! most of them were even writing books. They never
romped, they talked but little, they never sang, save in the nightly
prayer-meeting. The pleasure ship was a synagogue, and the pleasure trip
was a funeral excursion without a corpse. (There is nothing exhilarating
about a funeral excursion without a corpse.) A free, hearty laugh was a
sound that was not heard oftener than once in seven days about those
decks or in those cabins, and when it was heard it met with precious
little sympathy. The excursionists danced, on three separate evenings,
long, long ago, (it seems an age.) quadrilles, of a single set, made up
of three ladies and five gentlemen, (the latter with handkerchiefs
around their arms to signify their sex.) who timed their feet to the
solemn wheezing of a melodeon; but even this melancholy orgie was voted
to be sinful, and dancing was discontinued.</p>
<p>The pilgrims played dominoes when too much Josephus or Robinson's Holy
Land Researches, or book-writing, made recreation necessary—for
dominoes is about as mild and sinless a game as any in the world,
perhaps, excepting always the ineffably insipid diversion they call
croquet, which is a game where you don't pocket any balls and don't
carom on any thing of any consequence, and when you are done nobody has
to pay, and there are no refreshments to saw off, and, consequently,
there isn't any satisfaction whatever about it—they played
dominoes till they were rested, and then they blackguarded each other
privately till prayer-time. When they were not seasick they were
uncommonly prompt when the dinner-gong sounded. Such was our daily life
on board the ship—solemnity, decorum, dinner, dominoes, devotions,
slander. It was not lively enough for a pleasure trip; but if we had
only had a corpse it would have made a noble funeral excursion. It is
all over now; but when I look back, the idea of these venerable fossils
skipping forth on a six months' picnic, seems exquisitely refreshing.
The advertised title of the expedition—"The Grand Holy Land
Pleasure Excursion"—was a misnomer. "The Grand Holy Land Funeral
Procession" would have been better—much better.</p>
<p>Wherever we went, in Europe, Asia, or Africa, we made a sensation, and,
I suppose I may add, created a famine. None of us had ever been any
where before; we all hailed from the interior; travel was a wild novelty
to us, and we conducted ourselves in accordance with the natural
instincts that were in us, and trammeled ourselves with no ceremonies,
no conventionalities. We always took care to make it understood that we
were Americans—Americans! When we found that a good many
foreigners had hardly ever heard of America, and that a good many more
knew it only as a barbarous province away off somewhere, that had lately
been at war with somebody, we pitied the ignorance of the Old World, but
abated no jot of our importance. Many and many a simple community in the
Eastern hemisphere will remember for years the incursion of the strange
horde in the year of our Lord 1867, that called themselves Americans,
and seemed to imagine in some unaccountable way that they had a right to
be proud of it. We generally created a famine, partly because the coffee
on the Quaker City was unendurable, and sometimes the more substantial
fare was not strictly first class; and partly because one naturally
tires of sitting long at the same board and eating from the same dishes.</p>
<p>The people of those foreign countries are very, very ignorant. They
looked curiously at the costumes we had brought from the wilds of
America. They observed that we talked loudly at table sometimes. They
noticed that we looked out for expenses, and got what we conveniently
could out of a franc, and wondered where in the mischief we came from.
In Paris they just simply opened their eyes and stared when we spoke to
them in French! We never did succeed in making those idiots understand
their own language. One of our passengers said to a shopkeeper, in
reference to a proposed return to buy a pair of gloves, "Allong restay
trankeel—may be ve coom Moonday;" and would you believe it, that
shopkeeper, a born Frenchman, had to ask what it was that had been said.
Sometimes it seems to me, somehow, that there must be a difference
between Parisian French and Quaker City French.</p>
<p>The people stared at us every where, and we stared at them. We generally
made them feel rather small, too, before we got done with them, because
we bore down on them with America's greatness until we crushed them. And
yet we took kindly to the manners and customs, and especially to the
fashions of the various people we visited. When we left the Azores, we
wore awful capotes and used fine tooth combs—successfully. When we
came back from Tangier, in Africa, we were topped with fezzes of the
bloodiest hue, hung with tassels like an Indian's scalp-lock. In France
and Spain we attracted some attention in these costumes. In Italy they
naturally took us for distempered Garibaldians, and set a gunboat to
look for any thing significant in our changes of uniform. We made Rome
howl. We could have made any place howl when we had all our clothes on.
We got no fresh raiment in Greece—they had but little there of any
kind. But at Constantinople, how we turned out! Turbans, scimetars,
fezzes, horse-pistols, tunics, sashes, baggy trowsers, yellow slippers—Oh,
we were gorgeous! The illustrious dogs of Constantinople barked their
under jaws off, and even then failed to do us justice. They are all dead
by this time. They could not go through such a run of business as we
gave them and survive.</p>
<p>And then we went to see the Emperor of Russia. We just called on him as
comfortably as if we had known him a century or so, and when we had
finished our visit we variegated ourselves with selections from Russian
costumes and sailed away again more picturesque than ever. In Smyrna we
picked up camel's hair shawls and other dressy things from Persia; but
in Palestine—ah, in Palestine—our splendid career ended.
They didn't wear any clothes there to speak of. We were satisfied, and
stopped. We made no experiments. We did not try their costume. But we
astonished the natives of that country. We astonished them with such
eccentricities of dress as we could muster. We prowled through the Holy
Land, from Cesarea Philippi to Jerusalem and the Dead Sea, a weird
procession of pilgrims, gotten up regardless of expense, solemn,
gorgeous, green-spectacled, drowsing under blue umbrellas, and astride
of a sorrier lot of horses, camels and asses than those that came out of
Noah's ark, after eleven months of seasickness and short rations. If
ever those children of Israel in Palestine forget when Gideon's Band
went through there from America, they ought to be cursed once more and
finished. It was the rarest spectacle that ever astounded mortal eyes,
perhaps.</p>
<p>Well, we were at home in Palestine. It was easy to see that that was the
grand feature of the expedition. We had cared nothing much about Europe.
We galloped through the Louvre, the Pitti, the Ufizzi, the Vatican—all
the galleries—and through the pictured and frescoed churches of
Venice, Naples, and the cathedrals of Spain; some of us said that
certain of the great works of the old masters were glorious creations of
genius, (we found it out in the guide-book, though we got hold of the
wrong picture sometimes,) and the others said they were disgraceful old
daubs. We examined modern and ancient statuary with a critical eye in
Florence, Rome, or any where we found it, and praised it if we saw fit,
and if we didn't we said we preferred the wooden Indians in front of the
cigar stores of America. But the Holy Land brought out all our
enthusiasm. We fell into raptures by the barren shores of Galilee; we
pondered at Tabor and at Nazareth; we exploded into poetry over the
questionable loveliness of Esdraelon; we meditated at Jezreel and
Samaria over the missionary zeal of Jehu; we rioted—fairly rioted
among the holy places of Jerusalem; we bathed in Jordan and the Dead
Sea, reckless whether our accident-insurance policies were
extra-hazardous or not, and brought away so many jugs of precious water
from both places that all the country from Jericho to the mountains of
Moab will suffer from drouth this year, I think. Yet, the pilgrimage
part of the excursion was its pet feature—there is no question
about that. After dismal, smileless Palestine, beautiful Egypt had few
charms for us. We merely glanced at it and were ready for home.</p>
<p>They wouldn't let us land at Malta—quarantine; they would not let
us land in Sardinia; nor at Algiers, Africa; nor at Malaga, Spain, nor
Cadiz, nor at the Madeira islands. So we got offended at all foreigners
and turned our backs upon them and came home. I suppose we only stopped
at the Bermudas because they were in the programme. We did not care any
thing about any place at all. We wanted to go home. Homesickness was
abroad in the ship—it was epidemic. If the authorities of New York
had known how badly we had it, they would have quarantined us here.</p>
<p>The grand pilgrimage is over. Good-bye to it, and a pleasant memory to
it, I am able to say in all kindness. I bear no malice, no ill-will
toward any individual that was connected with it, either as passenger or
officer. Things I did not like at all yesterday I like very well to-day,
now that I am at home, and always hereafter I shall be able to poke fun
at the whole gang if the spirit so moves me to do, without ever saying a
malicious word. The expedition accomplished all that its programme
promised that it should accomplish, and we ought all to be satisfied
with the management of the matter, certainly. Bye-bye!</p>
<p>MARK TWAIN.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I call that complimentary. It is complimentary; and yet I never have
received a word of thanks for it from the Hadjis; on the contrary I speak
nothing but the serious truth when I say that many of them even took
exceptions to the article. In endeavoring to please them I slaved over
that sketch for two hours, and had my labor for my pains. I never will do
a generous deed again.<br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<h2> <SPAN name="CONCLUSION" id="CONCLUSION"></SPAN>CONCLUSION </h2>
<p>Nearly one year has flown since this notable pilgrimage was ended; and as
I sit here at home in San Francisco thinking, I am moved to confess that
day by day the mass of my memories of the excursion have grown more and
more pleasant as the disagreeable incidents of travel which encumbered
them flitted one by one out of my mind—and now, if the Quaker City
were weighing her anchor to sail away on the very same cruise again,
nothing could gratify me more than to be a passenger. With the same
captain and even the same pilgrims, the same sinners. I was on excellent
terms with eight or nine of the excursionists (they are my staunch friends
yet,) and was even on speaking terms with the rest of the sixty-five. I
have been at sea quite enough to know that that was a very good average.
Because a long sea-voyage not only brings out all the mean traits one has,
and exaggerates them, but raises up others which he never suspected he
possessed, and even creates new ones. A twelve months' voyage at sea would
make of an ordinary man a very miracle of meanness. On the other hand, if
a man has good qualities, the spirit seldom moves him to exhibit them on
shipboard, at least with any sort of emphasis. Now I am satisfied that our
pilgrims are pleasant old people on shore; I am also satisfied that at sea
on a second voyage they would be pleasanter, somewhat, than they were on
our grand excursion, and so I say without hesitation that I would be glad
enough to sail with them again. I could at least enjoy life with my
handful of old friends. They could enjoy life with their cliques as well—passengers
invariably divide up into cliques, on all ships.</p>
<p>And I will say, here, that I would rather travel with an excursion party
of Methuselahs than have to be changing ships and comrades constantly, as
people do who travel in the ordinary way. Those latter are always grieving
over some other ship they have known and lost, and over other comrades
whom diverging routes have separated from them. They learn to love a ship
just in time to change it for another, and they become attached to a
pleasant traveling companion only to lose him. They have that most dismal
experience of being in a strange vessel, among strange people who care
nothing about them, and of undergoing the customary bullying by strange
officers and the insolence of strange servants, repeated over and over
again within the compass of every month. They have also that other misery
of packing and unpacking trunks—of running the distressing gauntlet
of custom-houses—of the anxieties attendant upon getting a mass of
baggage from point to point on land in safety. I had rasher sail with a
whole brigade of patriarchs than suffer so. We never packed our trunks but
twice—when we sailed from New York, and when we returned to it.
Whenever we made a land journey, we estimated how many days we should be
gone and what amount of clothing we should need, figured it down to a
mathematical nicety, packed a valise or two accordingly, and left the
trunks on board. We chose our comrades from among our old, tried friends,
and started. We were never dependent upon strangers for companionship. We
often had occasion to pity Americans whom we found traveling drearily
among strangers with no friends to exchange pains and pleasures with.
Whenever we were coming back from a land journey, our eyes sought one
thing in the distance first—the ship—and when we saw it riding
at anchor with the flag apeak, we felt as a returning wanderer feels when
he sees his home. When we stepped on board, our cares vanished, our
troubles were at an end—for the ship was home to us. We always had
the same familiar old state-room to go to, and feel safe and at peace and
comfortable again.</p>
<p>I have no fault to find with the manner in which our excursion was
conducted. Its programme was faithfully carried out—a thing which
surprised me, for great enterprises usually promise vastly more than they
perform. It would be well if such an excursion could be gotten up every
year and the system regularly inaugurated. Travel is fatal to prejudice,
bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on
these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things can
not be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the earth all one's
lifetime.</p>
<p>The Excursion is ended, and has passed to its place among the things that
were. But its varied scenes and its manifold incidents will linger
pleasantly in our memories for many a year to come. Always on the wing, as
we were, and merely pausing a moment to catch fitful glimpses of the
wonders of half a world, we could not hope to receive or retain vivid
impressions of all it was our fortune to see. Yet our holyday flight has
not been in vain—for above the confusion of vague recollections,
certain of its best prized pictures lift themselves and will still
continue perfect in tint and outline after their surroundings shall have
faded away.</p>
<p>We shall remember something of pleasant France; and something also of
Paris, though it flashed upon us a splendid meteor, and was gone again, we
hardly knew how or where. We shall remember, always, how we saw majestic
Gibraltar glorified with the rich coloring of a Spanish sunset and
swimming in a sea of rainbows. In fancy we shall see Milan again, and her
stately Cathedral with its marble wilderness of graceful spires. And Padua—Verona—Como,
jeweled with stars; and patrician Venice, afloat on her stagnant flood—silent,
desolate, haughty—scornful of her humbled state—wrapping
herself in memories of her lost fleets, of battle and triumph, and all the
pageantry of a glory that is departed.</p>
<p>We can not forget Florence—Naples—nor the foretaste of heaven
that is in the delicious atmosphere of Greece—and surely not Athens
and the broken temples of the Acropolis. Surely not venerable Rome—nor
the green plain that compasses her round about, contrasting its brightness
with her gray decay—nor the ruined arches that stand apart in the
plain and clothe their looped and windowed raggedness with vines. We shall
remember St. Peter's: not as one sees it when he walks the streets of Rome
and fancies all her domes are just alike, but as he sees it leagues away,
when every meaner edifice has faded out of sight and that one dome looms
superbly up in the flush of sunset, full of dignity and grace, strongly
outlined as a mountain.</p>
<p>We shall remember Constantinople and the Bosporus—the colossal
magnificence of Baalbec—the Pyramids of Egypt—the prodigious
form, the benignant countenance of the Sphynx—Oriental Smyrna—sacred
Jerusalem—Damascus, the "Pearl of the East," the pride of Syria, the
fabled Garden of Eden, the home of princes and genii of the Arabian
Nights, the oldest metropolis on earth, the one city in all the world that
has kept its name and held its place and looked serenely on while the
Kingdoms and Empires of four thousand years have risen to life, enjoyed
their little season of pride and pomp, and then vanished and been
forgotten!<br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<p><SPAN name="p651" id="p651"></SPAN></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG alt="p651.jpg (7K)" src="images/p651.jpg" width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<p><br/></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />