<h2><SPAN name="No_II" id="No_II"></SPAN>No. II.</h2>
<h3>BREWING BEER—(<i>continued.</i>)</h3>
<p>38. As to using <i>barley</i> in the making of beer, I have given it a full and
fair trial twice over, and I would recommend it to neither rich nor poor.
The barley produces <i>strength</i>, though nothing like the malt; but<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_24" id="Page_24"></SPAN></span> the
beer is <i>flat</i>, even though you use half malt and half barley; and flat
beer lies heavy on the stomach, and of course, besides the bad taste, is
unwholesome. To pay 4<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> tax upon every bushel of our own barley,
turned into malt, when the barley itself is not worth 3<i>s.</i> a bushel, is a
horrid thing; but, as long as the owners of the land shall be so dastardly
as to suffer themselves to be thus deprived of the use of their estates to
favour the slave-drivers and plunderers of the East and West Indies, we
must submit to the thing, incomprehensible to foreigners, and even to
ourselves, as the submission may be.</p>
<p>39. With regard to <i>hops</i>, the quality is very various. At times when some
sell for 5<i>s.</i> a pound, others sell for <i>sixpence</i>. Provided the purchaser
understand the article, the quality is, of course, in proportion to the
price. There are two things to be considered in hops: the <i>power of
preserving beer</i>, and that of giving it a <i>pleasant flavour</i>. Hops may be
<i>strong</i>; and yet not <i>good</i>. They should be <i>bright</i>, have no <i>leaves</i> or
bits of branches amongst them. The hop is the <i>husk</i>, or <i>seed-pod</i>, of
the hop-vine, as the <i>cone</i> is that of the fir-tree; and the <i>seeds</i>
themselves are deposited, like those of the fir, round a little soft
stalk, enveloped by the several folds of this pod, or cone. If, in the
gathering, leaves of the vine or bits of the branches are mixed with the
hops, these not only help to make up the <i>weight</i>, but they give a <i>bad
taste</i> to the beer; and indeed, if they abound much, they spoil the beer.
Great attention is therefore necessary in this respect. There are, too,
numerous <i>sorts</i> of hops, varying in size, form, and quality, quite as
much as <i>apples</i>. However, when they are in a state to be used in brewing,
the marks of goodness are an absence of <i>brown colour</i>, (for that
indicates perished hops;) a colour <i>between green</i> and <i>yellow</i>; a great
<i>quantity of the yellow farina</i>; seeds <i>not too large nor too hard</i>; a
<i>clammy feel</i> when rubbed between the fingers; and a <i>lively</i>, pleasant
smell. As to the <i>age</i> of hops, they retain for twenty years, probably,
their <i>power of preserving beer</i>; but not of giving it a pleasant flavour.
I have<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_25" id="Page_25"></SPAN></span> used them at <i>ten years old</i>, and should have no fear of using
them at twenty. They lose none of their <i>bitterness</i>; none of their power
of preserving beer; but they lose the other quality; and therefore, in the
making of fine ale, or beer, new hops are to be preferred. As to the
<i>quantity</i> of hops, it is clear, from what has been said, that that must,
in some degree depend upon their <i>quality</i>; but, supposing them to be good
in quality, a pound of hops to a bushel of malt is about the quantity. A
good deal, however, depends upon the length of time that the beer is
intended to be kept, and upon the season of the year in which it is
brewed. Beer intended to be kept a long while should have the full pound,
also beer brewed in warmer weather, though for present use: half the
quantity may do under an opposite state of circumstances.</p>
<p>40. The <i>water</i> should be soft by all means. That of brooks, or rivers, is
best. That of a <i>pond</i>, fed by a rivulet, or spring, will do very well.
<i>Rain-water</i>, if just fallen, may do; but stale rain-water, or stagnant
pond-water, makes the beer <i>flat</i> and difficult to keep; and <i>hard water</i>,
from wells, is very bad; it does not get the sweetness out of the malt,
nor the bitterness out of the hops, like soft water; and the wort of it
does not ferment well, which is a certain proof of its unfitness for the
purpose.</p>
<p>41. There are two descriptions of persons whom I am desirous to see
brewing their own beer; namely, <i>tradesmen</i>, and <i>labourers</i> and
<i>journeymen</i>. There must, therefore, be two <i>distinct scales</i> treated of.
In the former editions of this work, I spoke of a <i>machine</i> for brewing,
and stated the advantages of using it in a family of any considerable
consumption of beer; but, while, from my desire to promote <i>private
brewing</i>, I strongly recommended the <i>machine</i>, I stated that, “if any of
my readers could point out any method by which we should be more likely to
restore the practice of private brewing, and especially to the <i>cottage</i>,
I should be greatly obliged to them to communicate it to me.” Such
communications have been made, and I am very happy to be able, in this new
edition of my<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_26" id="Page_26"></SPAN></span> little work, to avail myself of them. There was, in the
<i>Patent Machine</i>, always, an objection on account of the <i>expense</i>; for,
even the machine for <i>one bushel of malt</i> cost, at the reduced price,
<i>eight pounds</i>; a sum far above the reach of <i>a cottager</i>, and even above
that of a small tradesman. Its <i>convenience</i>, especially in <i>towns</i>, where
room <ins class="correction" title="original: it">is</ins> so valuable, was an object of great importance; but there were
<i>disadvantages</i> attending it which, until after some experience, I did not
ascertain. It will be remembered that the method by the brewing machine
requires the malt to be put into <i>the cold water</i>, and for the water to
make the malt <i>swim</i>, or, at least, to be in such proportion as to prevent
the fire beneath from burning the malt. We found that our beer was <i>flat</i>,
and that it did <i>not keep</i>. And this arose, I have every reason to
believe, from this process. The malt should be put <i>into hot water</i>, and
the water, at first, should be but just sufficient in quantity to <i>stir
the malt in</i>, and <i>separate it well</i>. Nevertheless, when it is merely to
make <i>small beer</i>; beer <i>not wanted to keep</i>; in such cases the brewing
machine may be of use; and, as will be seen by-and-by, a moveable <i>boiler</i>
(which has nothing to do with the <i>patent</i>) may, in many cases, be of
great convenience and utility.</p>
<p>42. The two <i>scales</i> of which I have spoken above, are now to be spoken
of; and, that I may explain my meaning the more clearly, I shall suppose,
that, for the tradesman’s family, it will be requisite to brew eighteen
gallons of ale and thirty-six of small beer, to fill three casks of
eighteen gallons each. It will be observed, of course, that, for larger
quantities, larger utensils of all sorts will be wanted. I take this
quantity as the one to give directions on. The utensils wanted here will
be, <span class="smcap">First</span>, a <i>copper</i> that will contain <i>forty gallons</i>, at least; for,
though there be to be but thirty-six gallons of small beer, there must be
space for the hops, and for the liquor that goes off in steam. <span class="smcap">Second</span>, a
<i>mashing-tub</i> to contain sixty gallons; for the malt is to be in this
along with the water. <span class="smcap">Third</span>, an <i>underbuck</i>, or shallow tub to go under
the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_27" id="Page_27"></SPAN></span> mash-tub, for the wort to run into when drawn from the grains.
<span class="smcap">Fourth</span>, a <i>tun-tub</i>, that will contain thirty gallons, to put the ale into
to work, the mash-tub, as we shall see, serving as a tun-tub for the small
beer. Besides these, a couple of <i>coolers</i>, shallow tubs, which may be the
heads of wine buts, or some such things, about a foot deep; or if you have
<i>four</i> it may be as well, in order to effect the cooling more quickly.</p>
<p>43. You begin by filling the copper with water, and next by making the
water <i>boil</i>. You then put into the mashing-tub water sufficient <i>to stir
and separate the malt in</i>. But now let me say more particularly what this
mashing-tub is. It is, you know, to contain <i>sixty gallons</i>. It is to be a
little broader at top than at bottom, and not quite so deep as it is wide
across the bottom. Into the middle of the bottom there is a hole about two
inches over, to draw the wort off through. In this hole goes a stick, a
foot or two longer than the tub is high. This stick is to be about two
inches through, and <i>tapered</i> for about eight inches upwards at the end
that goes into the hole, which at last it fills up closely as a cork. Upon
the hole, before any thing else be put into the tub, you lay a little
bundle of <i>fine birch</i>, (heath or straw <i>may</i> do,) about half the bulk of
a birch broom, and well tied at both ends. This being laid over the hole
(to keep back the grains as the wort goes out,) you put the tapered end of
the stick down through into the hole, and thus <i>cork</i> the hole up. You
must then have something of weight sufficient to keep the birch steady at
the bottom of the tub, with a hole through it to slip down the stick;
otherwise when the stick is raised it will be apt to raise the birch with
it, and when you are stirring the mash you would move it from its place.
The best thing for this purpose will be a <i>leaden collar</i> for the stick,
with the hole in the collar plenty large enough, and it should weigh three
or four pounds. The thing they use in some farm-houses is the iron box of
a wheel. Any thing will do that will slide down the stick, and lie with
weight enough on the birch to keep it from moving. Now, then, you are
ready<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_28" id="Page_28"></SPAN></span> to begin brewing. I allow <i>two bushels</i> of malt for the brewing I
have supposed. You must now put into the mashing-tub as much boiling water
as will be sufficient to <i>stir the malt in</i> and <i>separate it well</i>. But
here occur some of the nicest points of all; namely, the <i>degree of heat</i>
that the water is to be at, before you put in the malt. This heat is <i>one
hundred and seventy degrees</i> by the thermometer. If you have a
thermometer, this is ascertained easily; but, without one, take this rule,
by which so much good beer has been made in England for hundreds of years:
when you can, by looking down into the tub, <i>see your face clearly in the
water</i>, the water is become cool enough; and you must not put the malt in
before. Now put in the malt and <i>stir it well in the water</i>. To perform
this stirring, which is very necessary, you have a stick, somewhat bigger
than a broom-stick, with two or three smaller sticks, eight or ten inches
long, put through the lower end of it at about three or four inches
asunder, and sticking out on each side of the long stick. These small
cross sticks serve to search the malt and separate it well in the stirring
or <i>mashing</i>. Thus, then, the <i>malt is in</i>; and in this state it should
continue for about a quarter of an hour. In the mean while you will have
filled up your copper, and made it <i>boil</i>; and now (at the end of the
quarter of an hour) you put in boiling water sufficient to give you your
eighteen gallons of <i>ale</i>. But, perhaps, you must have thirty gallons of
water in the whole; for the grains will retain at least ten gallons of
water; and it is better to have rather too much wort than too little. When
your proper quantity of water is in, stir the malt again well. Cover the
mashing-tub over with <i>sacks</i>, or something that will answer the same
purpose; and there let the mash stand for <i>two hours</i>. When it has stood
the two hours, you draw off the wort. And now, mind, the mashing-tub is
placed on a <i>couple of stools</i>, or on something, that will enable you to
put the <i>underbuck</i> under it, so as to receive the wort as it comes out of
the hole before-mentioned. When you have put the underbuck in its place,
you let out the wort by pulling<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_29" id="Page_29"></SPAN></span> up the stick that corks the whole. But,
observe, this stick (which goes six or eight inches through the hole) must
be raised by degrees, and the wort must be let out <i>slowly</i>, in order to
keep back the <i>sediment</i>. So that it is necessary to have something to
<i>keep the stick up</i> at the point where you are to raise it, and wish to
fix it at for the time. To do this, the simplest, cheapest and best thing
in the world is a <i>cleft stick</i>. Take a <i>rod</i> of ash, hazel, birch, or
almost any wood; let it be a foot or two longer than your mashing-tub is
wide over the top; <i>split</i> it, as if for making hoops; tie it round with a
string at each end; lay it across your mashing-tub; pull it open in the
middle, and let the upper part of the wort-stick through it, and when you
raise that stick, by degrees as before directed, the cleft stick <i>will
hold it up</i> at whatever height you please.</p>
<p>44. When you have drawn off the <i>ale-wort</i>, you proceed to put into the
mashing tub water for the <i>small beer</i>. But, I shall go on with my
directions about the <i>ale</i> till I have got it into the <i>cask</i> and
<i>cellar</i>; and shall then return to the small-beer.</p>
<p>45. As you draw off the ale-wort into the underbuck, you must lade it out
of that into the tun-tub, for which work, as well as for various other
purposes in the brewing, you must have a <i>bowl-dish</i> with a handle to it.
The underbuck will not hold the whole of the wort. It is, as before
described, a shallow tub, to go <i>under</i> the mashing-tub to draw off the
wort into. Out of this underbuck you must lade the ale-wort into the
<i>tun-tub</i>; and there it must remain till your <i>copper</i> be emptied and
ready to receive it.</p>
<p>46. The copper being empty, you put the wort into it, and put in after the
wort, or before it, <i>a pound and a half of good hops</i>, well rubbed and
separated as you put them in. You now make the copper boil, and keep it,
with the lid off, at a good <i>brisk</i> boil, for a <i>full hour</i>, and if it be
an hour and a half it is none the worse.</p>
<p>47. When the boiling is done, put out your fire, and put the liquor into
the <i>coolers</i>. But it must be put into the coolers <i>without the hops</i>.
Therefore, in<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_30" id="Page_30"></SPAN></span> order to get the hops out of the liquor, you must have a
<i>strainer</i>. The best for your purpose is a small <i>clothes-basket</i>, or any
other wicker-basket. You set your coolers in the most convenient place. It
may be in-doors or out of doors, as most convenient. You lay a couple of
sticks across one of the coolers, and put the basket upon them. Put your
liquor, hops and all, into the basket, which will <i>keep back the hops</i>.
When you have got liquor enough in one cooler, you go to another with your
sticks and basket, till you have got all your liquor out. If you find your
liquor deeper in one cooler than the other, you can make an alteration in
that respect, till you have the liquor so distributed as to cool equally
fast in both, or all, the coolers.</p>
<p>48. The next stage of the liquor is in the <i>tun-tub</i>, where it is <i>set to
work</i>. Now, a very great point is, the <i>degree of heat</i> that the liquor is
to be at when it is set to working. The proper heat is seventy degrees; so
that a thermometer makes this matter sure. In the country they determine
the degree of heat by merely putting a finger into the liquor. Seventy
degrees is but <i>just warm</i>, a gentle <i>luke-warmth</i>. Nothing like <i>heat</i>. A
little experience makes perfectness in such a matter. When at the proper
heat, or nearly, (for the liquor will cool a little in being removed,) put
it into the <i>tun-tub</i>. And now, before I speak of the act of setting the
beer to work, I must describe this <i>tun-tub</i>, which I first mentioned in
Paragraph 42. It is to hold <i>thirty gallons</i>, as you have seen; and
nothing is better than an old <i>cask</i> of that size, or somewhat larger,
with the head taken out, or cut off. But, indeed, any tub of sufficient
dimensions, and of about the same depth proportioned to the width as a
cask or barrel has, will do for the purpose. Having put the liquor into
the tun-tub, you put in the <i>yeast</i>. About <i>half a pint</i> of good yeast is
sufficient. This should first be put into a thing of some sort that will
hold about a gallon of your liquor; the thing should then be nearly filled
with liquor, and with a stick or spoon you should mix the yeast well with
the liquor in this bowl, or other thing, and stir in along<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_31" id="Page_31"></SPAN></span> with the yeast
a handful of <i>wheat or rye flour</i>. This mixture is then to be poured out
clean into the tun-tub, and the whole mass of the liquor is then to be
agitated well by lading up and pouring down again with your bowl-dish,
till the yeast be well mixed with the liquor. Some people do the thing in
another manner. They mix up the yeast and flour with some liquor (as just
mentioned) taken out of the coolers; and then they set the little vessel
that contains this mixture down <i>on the bottom of the tun-tub</i>; and,
leaving it there, put the liquor out of the coolers into the tun-tub.
Being placed at the bottom, and having the liquor poured on it, the
mixture is, perhaps, more perfectly effected in this way than in any way.
The <i>flour</i> may not be necessary; but, as the country people use it, it
is, doubtless, of some use; for their hereditary experience has not been
for nothing. When your liquor is thus properly put into the tun-tub and
set a working, cover over the top of the tub by laying across it a sack or
two, or something that will answer the purpose.</p>
<p>49. We now come to the <i>last stage</i>; the <i>cask</i> or <i>barrel</i>. But I must
first speak of the place for the tun-tub to stand in. The place should be
such as to avoid too much warmth or cold. The air should, if possible, be
at about 55 degrees. Any cool place in summer and any <i>warmish</i> place in
winter. If the weather be <i>very cold</i>, some cloths or sacks should be put
round the tun-tub while the beer is working. In about six or eight hours,
a <i>frothy</i> head will rise upon the liquor; and it will keep rising, more
or less slowly, for about forty-eight hours. But, the <i>length of time</i>
required for the working depends on various circumstances; so that no
precise time can be fixed. The best way is, to take off the froth (which
is indeed <i>yeast</i>) at the end of about twenty-four hours, with a common
skimmer, and put it into a pan or vessel of some sort; then, in twelve
hours’ time, take it off again in the same way; and so on till the liquor
has <i>done working</i>, and sends up no more yeast. Then it is <i>beer</i>; and
when it is <i>quite cold</i> (for <i>ale</i> or<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_32" id="Page_32"></SPAN></span> <i>strong beer</i>) put it into the
<i>cask</i> by means of a <i>funnel</i>. It must be cold before you do this, or it
will be what the country-people call <i>foxed</i>; that is to say, have a rank
and disagreeable taste. Now, as to the <i>cask</i>, it must be <i>sound</i> and
<i>sweet</i>. I thought, when writing the former edition of this work, that the
<i>bell-shaped</i> were the best casks. I am now convinced that that was an
error. The bell-shaped, by contracting the width of the top of the beer,
as that top descends, in consequence of the draft for use, certainly
prevents the <i>head</i> (which always gathers on beer as soon as you begin to
draw it off) from breaking and mixing in amongst the beer. This is an
advantage in the bell-shape; but then the bell-shape, which places the
widest end of the cask uppermost, exposes the cask to the admission of
<i>external air</i> much more than the other shape. This danger approaches from
the <i>ends</i> of the cask; and, in the bell-shape, you have the <i>broadest</i>
end wholly exposed the moment you have drawn out the first gallon of beer,
which is not the case with the casks of the common shape. Directions are
given, in the case of the bell-casks, to put <i>damp sand</i> on the top to
keep out the air. But, it is very difficult to make this effectual; and
yet, if you do not keep out the air, your beer will be <i>flat</i>; and when
flat, it really is good for nothing but the pigs. It is very difficult to
<i>fill</i> the bell-cask, which you will easily see if you consider its shape.
It must be placed on the <i>level</i> with the greatest possible <i>truth</i>, or
there will be a space left; and to place it with such truth is, perhaps,
as difficult a thing as a mason or bricklayer ever had to perform. And
yet, if this be not done, there will be an <i>empty space</i> in the cask,
though it may, at the same time, run over. With the common casks there are
none of these difficulties. A common eye will see when it is well placed;
and, at any rate, any little vacant space that may be left is not at an
<i>end</i> of the cask, and will, without great carelessness, be so small as to
be of no consequence. We now come to the act of putting in the beer. The
cask should be placed on a stand<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_33" id="Page_33"></SPAN></span> with legs about a foot long. The cask,
being round, must have a little wedge, or block, on each side to keep it
steady. <i>Bricks</i> do very well. Bring your beer down into the cellar in
buckets, and pour it in through the funnel, until the cask be full. The
cask should <i>lean a little on one side</i>, when you fill it; because the
beer will <i>work again</i> here, and send more yeast out of the bung-hole;
and, if the cask were not a little on one side, the yeast would flow over
both sides of the cask, and would not descend in <i>one stream</i> into a pan,
put underneath to receive it. Here the bell-cask is extremely
inconvenient; for the yeast works up all <i>over the head</i>, and <i>cannot run
off</i>, and makes a very nasty affair. This <i>alone</i>, to say nothing of the
other disadvantages, would decide the question against the bell-casks.
Something will <i>go off in this working</i>, which may continue for two or
three days. When you put the beer in the cask, you should have a <i>gallon
or two left</i>, to keep filling up with as the working produces emptiness.
At last, when the working is completely over, <i>right</i> the cask. That is to
say, block it up to its level. Put in a handful of <i>fresh hops</i>. Fill the
cask quite full. Put in the bung, with a bit of <i>coarse linen</i> stuff round
it; hammer it down tight; and, if you like, fill a coarse bag with sand,
and lay it, well pressed down, over the bung.</p>
<p>50. As to the length of time that you are to keep the beer before you
begin to use it, that must, in some measure, depend on taste. <i>Such beer</i>
as this <i>ale</i> will keep almost any length of time. As to the mode of
<i>tapping</i>, that is as easy almost as <i>drinking</i>. When the cask is <i>empty</i>,
great care must be taken to cork it <i>tightly up</i>, so that no air get in;
for, if it do, the cask is <i>moulded</i>, and when once moulded, it is
<i>spoiled for ever</i>. It is never again fit to be used about beer. Before
the cask be used again, the grounds must be poured out, and the cask
cleaned by several times scalding; by putting in <i>stones</i> (or a <i>chain</i>,)
and rolling and shaking about till it be quite clean. Here again the round
casks have the decided<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_34" id="Page_34"></SPAN></span> advantage; it being almost impossible to make the
bell-casks thoroughly clean, without <i>taking the head out</i>, which is both
troublesome and expensive; as it cannot be well done by any one but a
<i>cooper</i>, who is not always at hand, and who, when he is, must be <i>paid</i>.</p>
<p>51. I have now done with the <i>ale</i>, and it remains for me to speak of the
<i>small beer</i>. In Paragraph 47 (which now see) I left you drawing off the
<i>ale-wort</i>, and with your copper full of boiling water. Thirty-six gallons
of that boiling water are, as soon as you have got your ale-wort out, and
have put down your mash-tub stick to close up the hole at the bottom; as
soon as you have done this, thirty-six gallons of the boiling water are to
go into the mashing-tub; the grains are to be well stirred up, as before;
the mashing-tub is to be covered over again, as mentioned in Paragraph 43;
and the mash is to stand in that state for <i>an hour</i>, and not two hours,
as for the ale-wort.</p>
<p>52. When the small beer mash has stood its hour, draw it off as in
Paragraph 47, and put it into the tun-tub as you did the ale-wort.</p>
<p>53. By this time your copper will be <i>empty</i> again, by putting your
ale-liquor to cool, as mentioned in Paragraph 47. And you now put the
small beer wort <i>into the copper</i>, with the hops that you used before, and
with <i>half a pound of fresh hops</i> added to them; and this liquor you boil
briskly for <i>an hour</i>.</p>
<p>54. By this time you will have taken the grains and the sediment clean out
of the mashing-tub, and taken out the bunch of birch twigs, and made all
clean. Now put in the birch twigs again, and put down your stick as
before. Lay your two or three sticks across the mashing-tub, put your
basket on them, and take your liquor from the copper (putting the fire out
first) and pour it into the mashing-tub through the basket. Take the
basket away, throw the hops to the dunghill, and leave the small beer
liquid <i>to cool in the mashing-tub</i>.</p>
<p>55. Here it is to remain to be <i>set to working</i> as<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_35" id="Page_35"></SPAN></span> mentioned for the ale,
in Paragraph 48; only, in this case, you will want <i>more yeast in
proportion</i>; and should have for your thirty-six gallons of small beer,
three half pints of good yeast.</p>
<p>56. Proceed, as to all the rest of the business, as with the ale, only, in
the case of the small beer, it should be put into the cask, not <i>quite
cold</i>, but a <i>little warm</i>; or else it will not work at all in the barrel,
which it ought to do. It will not work so strongly or so long as the ale;
and may be put in the barrel much sooner; in general the next day after it
is brewed.</p>
<p>57. All the utensils should be well cleaned and put away as soon as they
are done with; the <i>little</i> things as well as the great things; for it is
<i>loss of time</i> to make new ones. And, now, let us see the <i>expense</i> of
these utensils. The copper, <i>new</i>, 5<i>l.</i>; the mashing-tub, <i>new</i>, 30<i>s.</i>;
the tun-tub, not new, 5<i>s.</i>; the underbuck and three coolers, not new,
20<i>s.</i> The whole cost is 7<i>l.</i> 10<i>s.</i> which is ten shillings less than the
<i>one bushel machine</i>. I am now in a farm-house, where the <i>same set</i> of
utensils has been used for <i>forty years</i>; and the owner tells me, that,
with the same use, they may last for <i>forty years longer</i>. The machine
will not, I think, last <i>four years</i>, if in any thing like regular use. It
is of sheet-iron, <i>tinned on the inside</i>, and this tin <i>rusts</i>
exceedingly, and is not to be kept clean without such <i>rubbing</i> as must
soon take off the tin. The great advantage of the machine is, that it can
be <i>removed</i>. You can brew without a <i>brew-house</i>.—You can set the boiler
up against any fire-place, or any window. You can brew under a cart-shed,
and even out of doors. But all this may be done with <i>these utensils</i>, if
your <i>copper</i> be moveable. Make the boiler of <i>copper</i>, and not of
sheet-iron, and fix it on a stand with a fire-place and stove-pipe; and
then you have the whole to brew out of doors with as well as in-doors,
which is a very great convenience.</p>
<p>58. Now with regard to the <i>other</i> scale of brewing, little need be said;
because, all the principles being the same, the utensils only are to be
proportioned to<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_36" id="Page_36"></SPAN></span> the <i>quantity</i>. If only one sort of beer be to be brewed
at a time, all the difference is, that, in order to extract the whole of
the goodness of the malt, the mashing ought to be at <i>twice</i>. The two
worts are then put together, and then you boil them together with the
hops.</p>
<p>59. A Correspondent at <i>Morpeth</i> says, the whole of the utensils used by
him are a twenty-gallon <i>pot</i>, a mashing-tub, that also answers for a
tun-tub, and a shallow tub for a cooler; and that these are plenty for a
person who is any thing of a contriver. This is very true; and these
things will cost no more, perhaps, than <i>forty shillings</i>. A nine gallon
cask of beer can be brewed very well with such utensils. Indeed, it is
what used to be done by almost every labouring man in the kingdom, until
the high price of malt and comparatively low price of wages rendered the
people too poor and miserable to be able to brew at all. A Correspondent
at Bristol has obligingly sent me the model of utensils for <i>brewing on a
small scale</i>; but as they consist chiefly of <i>brittle ware</i>, I am of
opinion that they would not so well answer the purpose.</p>
<p>60. Indeed, as to the country labourers, all they want is the ability to
<i>get the malt</i>. Mr. <span class="smcap">Ellman</span>, in his evidence before the Agricultural
Committee, said, that, when he began farming, forty-five years ago, there
was not a labourer’s family in the parish that did not brew their own beer
and enjoy it by their own fire-sides; and that, <i>now, not one single
family did it, from want of ability to get the malt</i>. It is the <i>tax</i> that
prevents their getting the malt; for, the barley is cheap enough. The tax
causes a monopoly in the hands of the maltsters, who, when the tax is
<i>two</i> and <i>sixpence</i>, make the malt, cost 7<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>, though the barley
cost but 2<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>; and though the malt, tax and all, ought to cost him
about 5<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i> If the tax were taken off, this <i>pernicious monopoly</i>
would be destroyed.</p>
<p>61. The reader will easily see, that, in proportion to the quantity wanted
to be brewed must be the size of the utensils; but, I may observe here,
that the above utensils are sufficient for three, or even four, bushels of
malt, if stronger beer be wanted.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_37" id="Page_37"></SPAN></span>62. When it is necessary, in case of falling short in the quantity wanted
to fill up the ale cask, some may be taken from the small beer. But, upon
the <i>whole brewing</i>, there ought to be no falling short; because, if the
casks be not <i>filled up</i>, the beer will not be good, and certainly will
not <i>keep</i>. Great care should be taken as to the <i>cleansing</i> of the
<i>casks</i>. They should be made perfectly <i>sweet</i>; or it is impossible to
have good beer.</p>
<p>63. The cellar, for beer to keep any length of time, should be cool. Under
<i>a hill</i> is the best place for a cellar; but, at any rate, a cellar of
good depth, and <i>dry</i>. At certain times of the year, beer that is kept
long will ferment. The vent-pegs must, in such cases, be loosened a
little, and afterwards fastened.</p>
<p>64. Small beer may be tapped almost directly. It is a sort of joke that it
should <i>see a Sunday</i>; but, that it may do before it be two days old. In
short, any beer is better than water; but it should have some strength and
some <i>weeks</i> of age at any rate.</p>
<p>65. I cannot conclude this Essay without expressing my pleasure, that a
law has been recently passed to authorize the general retail of beer. This
really seems necessary to prevent the King’s subjects from being
<i>poisoned</i>. The brewers and porter quacks have carried their tricks to
such an extent, that there is <i>no safety</i> for those who drink brewer’s
beer.</p>
<p>66. The best and most effectual thing is, however, for people to <i>brew
their own beer</i>, to enable them and induce them to do which, I have done
all that lies in my power. A longer treatise on the subject would have
been of no use. These few plain directions will suffice for those who have
a disposition to do the thing, and those who have not would remain unmoved
by any thing that I could say.</p>
<p>67. There seems to be a <i>great number of things to do</i> in brewing, but the
greater part of them require only about a <i>minute</i> each. A brewing, such
as I have given the detail of above, may be completed in <i>a day</i>; but, by
the word <i>day</i>, I mean to include the <i>morning</i>, beginning at four
o’clock.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_38" id="Page_38"></SPAN></span>68. The putting of the beer into barrel is not more than an hour’s work
for a servant woman, or a tradesman’s or a farmer’s wife. There is no
<i>heavy</i> work, no work too heavy for a woman in any part of the business,
otherwise I would not recommend it to be performed by the women, who,
though so amiable in themselves, are never quite so amiable as when they
are <i>useful</i>; and as to beauty, though men may fall in love with girls at
<i>play</i>, there is nothing to make them stand to their love like seeing them
at <i>work</i>. In conclusion of these remarks on beer brewing, I once more
express my most anxious desire to see abolished for ever the accursed tax
on <i>malt</i>, which, I verily believe, has done more harm to the people of
England than was ever done to any people by plague, pestilence, famine,
and civil war.</p>
<p>69. In Paragraph 76, in Paragraph 108, and perhaps in another place or two
(of the last edition,) I spoke of the <i>machine</i> for brewing. The work
being <i>stereotyped</i>, it would have been troublesome to alter those
paragraphs; but, of course, the public, in reading them, will bear in mind
what has been <i>now</i> said relative to the <i>machine</i>. The inventor of that
machine deserves great praise for his efforts to promote private brewing;
and, as I said before, in certain confined situations, and where the beer
is to be merely <i>small beer</i>, and for <i>immediate use</i>, and where <i>time</i>
and <i>room</i> are of such importance as to make the <i>cost</i> of the machine
comparatively of trifling consideration, the machine may possibly be found
to be an useful utensil.</p>
<p>70. Having stated the inducements to the brewing of beer, and given the
plainest directions that I was able to give for the doing of the thing, I
shall, next, proceed to the subject of <i>bread</i>. But this subject is too
large and of too much moment to be treated with brevity, and must,
therefore, be put off till my next Number. I cannot, in the mean while,
dismiss the subject of <i>brewing beer</i> without once more adverting to its
many advantages, as set forth in the foregoing Number of this work.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_39" id="Page_39"></SPAN></span>71. The following instructions for the making of <i>porter</i>, will clearly
show what sort of stuff is sold at <i>public-houses</i> in London; and we may
pretty fairly suppose that the public-house beer in the country is not
superior to it in quality, “A quarter of malt, with these ingredients,
will make <i>five barrels of good porter</i>. Take one quarter of high-coloured
malt, eight pounds of hops, nine pounds of <i>treacle</i>, eight pounds of
<i>colour</i>, eight pounds of sliced <i>liquorice-root</i>, two drams of <i>salt of
tartar</i>, two ounces of <i>Spanish-liquorice</i>, and half an ounce of
<i>capsicum</i>.” The author says, that he merely gives the ingredients, as
<i>used by many persons</i>.</p>
<p>72. This extract is taken from a <i>book on brewing</i>, recently published in
London. What a curious composition! What a mess of drugs! But, if the
brewers <i>openly avow</i> this, what have we to expect from the <i>secret
practices</i> of them, and the <i>retailers</i> of the article! When we know, that
<i>beer-doctor</i> and <i>brewers’-druggist</i> are professions, practised as openly
as those of <i>bug-man</i> and <i>rat-killer</i>, are we simple enough to suppose
that the above-named are the <i>only</i> drugs that people swallow in those
potions, which they call <i>pots of beer</i>? Indeed, we know the contrary; for
scarcely a week passes without witnessing the detection of some greedy
wretch, who has used, in making or in <i>doctoring</i> his beer, drugs,
forbidden by the law. And, it is not many weeks since one of these was
convicted, in the Court of Excise, for using potent and dangerous drugs,
by the means of which, and a suitable quantity of water, he made <i>two buts
of beer into three</i>. Upon this occasion, it appeared that no less than
<i>ninety</i> of these worthies were in the habit of pursuing the same
practices. The drugs are not unpleasant to the taste; they sting the
palate: they give a present relish: they communicate a momentary
exhilaration: but, they give no force to the body, which, on the contrary,
they enfeeble, and, in many instances, with time, destroy; producing
diseases from which the drinker would otherwise have been free to the end
of his days.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_40" id="Page_40"></SPAN></span>73. But, look again at the receipt for making porter. Here are <i>eight</i>
bushels of malt to 180 gallons of beer; that is to say, twenty-fire
gallons from the bushel. Now the malt is eight shillings a bushel, and
eight pounds of the very <i>best hops</i> will cost but a shilling a pound. The
malt and hops, then, for the 180 gallons, cost but <i>seventy-two
shillings</i>; that is to say, only a little more than <i>fourpence three
farthings a gallon</i>, for stuff which is now retailed for <i>sixteen pence a
gallon</i>! If this be not an abomination, I should be glad to know what is.
Even if the treacle, colour, and the drugs, be included, the cost is not
<i>fivepence a gallon</i>; and yet, not content with this enormous extortion,
there are wretches who resort to the use of other and pernicious drugs, in
order to increase their gains!</p>
<p>74. To provide against this dreadful evil there is, and there can be, no
<i>law</i>; for, it is <i>created by the law</i>. The <i>law</i> it is that imposes the
enormous tax on the <i>malt</i> and <i>hops</i>; the <i>law</i> it is that imposes the
<i>license tax</i>, and places the power of granting the license at the
discretion of persons appointed by the government; the <i>law</i> it is that
checks, in this way, the private brewing, and that prevents <i>free and fair
competition</i> in the selling of beer, and as long as the <i>law</i> does these,
it will in vain endeavour to prevent the people from being destroyed by
slow poison.</p>
<p>75. Innumerable are the benefits that would arise from a repeal of the
taxes on malt and on hops. Tippling-houses might then be shut up with
justice and propriety. The labourer, the artisan, the tradesman, the
landlord, all would instantly feel the benefit. But the <i>landlord</i> more,
perhaps, in this case, than any other member of the community. The four or
five pounds a year which the day-labourer now drizzles away in tea-messes,
he would divide with the farmer, if he had untaxed beer. His wages would
<i>fall</i>, and fall to his <i>advantage</i> too. The fall of wages would be not
less than 40<i>l.</i> upon a hundred acres. Thus 40<i>l.</i> would go, in the end, a
fourth, perhaps to the farmer, and three-fourths to the landlord. This is
the kind of work to<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_41" id="Page_41"></SPAN></span> <i>reduce poor-rates</i>, and to restore <i>husbandry to
prosperity</i>. Undertaken this work <i>must</i> be, and <i>performed too</i>; but
whether we shall see this until the estates have passed away from the
<i>present race</i> of landlords, is a question which must be referred to
<i>time</i>.</p>
<p>76. Surely we may hope, that, when the American farmers shall see this
little Essay, they will begin seriously to think of leaving off the use of
the liver-burning and palsy-producing <i>spirits</i>. Their <i>climate</i>, indeed,
is something: <i>extremely hot</i> in one part of the year, and <i>extremely
cold</i> in the other part of it. Nevertheless, they may have, and do have,
very good beer if they will. <i>Negligence</i> is the greatest impediment in
their way. I like the Americans very much; and that, if there were no
other, would be a reason for my not hiding their faults.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<hr style="width: 50%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />